ML20112J612

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Addl Info Re Licensing of Facility,Per Woolridge & Discusses 850305 Meeting Concerning Applicant Program for Responding to Technical Review Team Concerns on Qa/Qc Items.Related Correspondence
ML20112J612
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/1985
From: Roisman A
TRIAL LAWYERS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C.
To: Bloch P, Grossman H, Jordan W
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#285-380 OL-2, NUDOCS 8504050240
Download: ML20112J612 (2)


Text

TRIAL l AWYERS FOR PUBUC JUSTICE, RCo 8 COUN5EuCRS AT LAW SulTE 6fl . _

2000 P STREET. NORTHWLST ,

h,:[

ANTHONY L ROISMAN VASHINGTON. D.C. 20036 (202)463-8600 EXECUTNE DIRECTOR TAFF A EY EIMN HANNON j.

sotNcEArmsOR SANDRA 5HUARD

[C .' t  ; +. , i

,- u OmCE MANAGER March 29, 1985 l l

Peter Bloch, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Herbert Grossman Alternate Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, D.C. 20555 Walter H. Jordan, Member Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Ih the matter of Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unito 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445-2 and 50-446-2 Gentlemen:

In the spirit of Mr. Wooldridge's March 21, 1985 letter to keep the Board informed of matters relating to the licensing of Comanche Peak in Docket 2, the following additional information is provided:

1. On4 Tuesday March 5,1985 a meeting took place at Comanche Peak involving the NRC Staff, the Applicant's CPRT, and their consultant to discuss the outline of the Applicant's program plan for responding to the TRT concerns on QA/QC items. Several CASE representatives were in attendance and the meeting was transcribed.
2. M r. J.R. Wells of Duke Power Company, selected by Applicant to be the Director of Quality Assurance was the Corporate QA ma. nager for the Duke Power Company during a significant portion of the construction of the Catawba 8504050240 850329 5 DR ADOCK 0500

]

l

l.

9 ll Nuclear Station. Relevant findings regarding harassment and intimidation of safety inspectors and other QA/QC problems at that plant during construction are contained in the Partial Initial Decision In Re: DUKE POWER COMPANY, et al.

(Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), ASLBP No. 81-463-060L of June 22, 1984. (19 NRC 1418, see particularly pp.

1437-44, 1531-32)

We will make every effort to keep the Board apprised of related matters as they come to our attention in the future.

Sincerely, k an Anthon 2r'. Roisman d Executive Director cc: Service List .

l

- _ _ _