ML20111A955
ML20111A955 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hatch |
Issue date: | 05/07/1996 |
From: | SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20111A951 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9605140104 | |
Download: ML20111A955 (22) | |
Text
- . . .__ _ _ _ _ _ __
1 l
l l
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EDWIN L HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 CYCLE 17 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 I
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 l
t l
~
9605140104 960507 PDR ADOCK 05000321 p PDR
l Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report i i
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
Section 31tle East l 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Rod Block Monitor 1 3.0 APLHGR Limit 2 l
4.0 MCPR Limit ;
11 I
5.0 APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High '
18 Time Constant 6.0 References 18 1
l i Revision 0 l
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF FIGURES Figure No.
Iills P.agt 3-1 MAPLHGR Multiplier (MAPFACp ) Versus Core 3 Flow 3-2 MAPLHGR Multiplier (MAPFACp ) Versus Core 4 Power 3-3 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB330-10GZ-80M-150-T) 5 3-4 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB314-8G4.0-80M-150-T) 6 3-5 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB331-10GZ-80M-150-T) 7 3-6 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE13-P9HTB327-12GZ-100M-146-T-L UA-RECON) 8 3-7 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Expost.re (GE9B-P8DWB346-10GZ-80U-150-T) 9 3-8 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE12-P10HSB331-6G5.0/4G4.0-100T-150 '!) 10 4-1 MCPR Multiplier (Kp) Versus Core Power 14 4-2 MCPR Limits (MCPRs) Versus Core Flow 15 4-3 MCPR Limit Versus Average Scram Time 16 (with Turbine Bypass Yahes Operable andEOC-RPT System Operable) 4-4 MCPR Limit as Function of Average Scram Time 17 (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable andEOC-RPT SystemInoperable) ii Revision 0
i l
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Eage 4-1 Operating Flexibility Options Applicability 13 1
l l
l l
w h
iii Revision 0
l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report
1.0 INTRODUCTION
! (
. The Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 is prepared in !
accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification S.6.5. This document was l
also produced in accordance with the requirements of BWRCA procedure BCA 40-10 and is documented in a DRF under QA No. NFS-96-029. The core operating limits presented
- herein were developed using NRC-approved methods (References 1 and 2). Results from the fuel vendor's reload analyses for the fuel in Unit 1 Cycle 17 are documented in References 3 and 4.
The following cycle-specific core operating limits are included in this repon:
- a. Control Rod Block Instrumentation - Technical Specification 3.3.2.1
- b. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) - Technical Specification 2.1 I
- c. Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - Technical Specifications 3.2.2 and 3.3.2.1
- d. APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High - Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.1.14 2.0 ROD BLOCK MONITOR (Technical Specification 3.3.2.1)
Both Rod Block Monitor (RBM) channels shall be operable as specified in Technical Specification 3.3.2.1 and when:
- a. Thermal Power is 2 29% and < 90% of Rated Thermal Power, and MCPR is < l.70; or
- b. Thermal Power is 2 90% of Rated Thermal Power, and MCPR is < l.40.
1 Revision 0 l
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 3.0 APLHGR LIMIT (Technical Specification 3.2.1)
The APLHGR limit for each fuel type is given by the applicable rated-power, rated-flow APLHGR limit taken from Figures 3-3 through 3-8, multiplied by the smaller of either:
- a. The flow-dependent multiplier, MAPFACr, from Figure 3 1, or
- b. The power-dependent multiplier, MAPFACp, from Figure 3-2.
For the fuel types whose APLHGR limits are shown in Figures 3-3 through 3-8, the APLHGR limit shall be applied to each axial location in the fuel assembly.
As required by GESTAR (Reference 1), the hand-calculated APLHGR values for a multi-lattice fuel (i.e., GE9-330, GE9-331, GE13-LUA, GE9-346, and GE12-331) must be less than or equal to the APLHGR limits shown in Figures 3-3, 3-5, 3-6,3-7, and 3-8, respectively. When APLHGR values are determined by the process computer, the lattice-dependent APLHGR limits are used. Under these conditions, some axial locations may have APLHGR values exceeding the values shown in Figures 3-3,3-5,3-6,3-7, and 3-8.
l l
l 2 Revision 0
1 l
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report i i
~ ~
l
///A--
Ell ms \
0.se jl((f[
im W
l 020 s
! cArucc,.M,wAo Maruma g i _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
w I MAPPAC,a MBAK2d N. MAPtM.7,]
3 0.70 l <
l l MAPMULTr e1 A POR PLOW > 81% 1
- . = ,an Ptow s.m l Mparo, (r).MeeMtas [1.o,4+ s, p3 l 0.60
,, e a,u m cong a MAXNUM i cons rum l (Y. RATM As op 0.50 l 1er.s oAssi o.s7e4 l l 107.o cAs74 OA758 j i 112.0 04214 tLeso7 l 117A 0.3020 0.8806 1
, . ,1 M @ H N N N N
.2 CORE FLOW (% rated)
FIGURE 3-1 MAPLHGR MULTIPLIER (MAPFACr) VERSUS CORE FLOW 3 Revision 0
_ . _ . ~ _ __-
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 1.0 l
l 0.9 i 0.5 i ig
/
!, spe0LE LOOP oPsRAftcel(sto)
$ 0.75 - = - -
0.7 f t uP na " Mu"e"ru*an%n
- "u.*.*'
l g m , ,,, g w m m aggyggo k
I"'
s'P 4 30%:
$ I asAPPAc, = e.ses . esostad (P.30%)
- j Ponsso% consFLow l0 E
p, i j ...
c.. . v.=>
g' l T M # N oi 2'
p i .mc.. . 4=>
I = =srt=>= "c'*"
,/ \
% . m consnow l o.4 g
52 20 26 30 40 50 80 70 00 90 100 POWER (% rated)
FIGURE 3-2 MAPLHGR MULTIPLIER (MAPFACp) VERSUS CORE POWER 4 Revision 0
i 1
I l l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 i i Core Operating Limits Report l
l l
l l
~
M L u
- j q UNACCEPTABLE EXPOSURE OPERATION !
. COORDINATES
~
11 X Y E ROD 11.52 51 I5 k g'
a
- :' 1. ,1.
100 12.10
$.0 N 9
E00 12.52 g\
- "E ll" ACCEPTABLE J *= 1105 OPERATION
. l 100 1119 .
. ; 10.00 1130
. ; l 11s0 1138 1 7 _; 1s.00 1112
. 20.00 12.44 g
. 2s.00 11.n 3s.00 tais K
! GE9B-PSDWB33010GZ 80M 180 T
, a 4s.co a.7s
\
st.e4 s.70 l
e s in is 20 2s 30 as # # so AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWdM)
MOST UMTING LATTICE AS A FUNCTION OF AVERAGE PLANMt expom=
FIGURE 3-3 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB330-10GZ-80M-150-T) 5 Revision 0
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 1.
! Y e 3\
12
/ 3 UNACCEPTABLE BON
.j g)ga(g u e
-; e m unares m 11 X Y
~ , ECO 11A
$ M 11A 10 7 1.00 ilo 100 112 N
1 00 113 400 115 ,
5
. j E00 117 ACCEMABLE
- a .". '28 tu OPERAVON s 00 in 3 10.00 114
. ! 1130 115 7
d 1&00 132
. i 2tL00 115 h
- J.! 46.00 9.0 GE9BMDWB3144C404DM 180 T
- -- - \
6
-l S1AT 6A ll mm, , - - _ , ~ . - - - -
0 5 10 15 20 25 M 35 40 46 80 AVERAGE RRMR EXPOSUE(GWWet)
FIGURE 3-4 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB314-8G4.0-80M-150-T) 6 Revision 0
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report I
/WI
[ 1 in UNACCEPTABLE ceOsuRs OPERATION
" ~
COORDINATES
- k g
j ._
am iisT 1 N i
tL20 11.02 10 -! 1.00 11.T5 D .
1 00 11.96 }
f l 1 00 1117
- 4.00 1141 g* m! 5 00 iles
- g*o g l ACCEPTABLE
__; a m i122 OPERATION I , '
i O.00 1132 10.00 1125 1150 1113 y_ _i 15.00 1198
{ 20.00 1115 l as e.' "t GE98 P8DWB33110GZ40M.150.T
, _; 46.m s.it --
g 80.00 5.06 1 i
},
s a a eo % 20 25 30 34 40 44 NOTE: 80 Tus a THE APLHOR UANT FOR THE AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (OWd/st) I MOSY UnETING LATTICE AS A FUNCTION 0F AVERAGE PLANAR ExPoeuns l
1 I
FIGURE 3-5 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB331-10GZ-80M-150-T) 7 Revision 0
1 i
l ,
l . !
l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 i l Core Operating Lhnits Report !
l l
i 13
,, UNACCEPTABLE
% OPERATION t f: :: .1 10
-)
EXPOSURE COORDINATES q
H ; X Y X Y I ~
~
0,00 11M 12.5 11.70 9 (L30 11.14 15.0 11.70
~ 1 1.00 11.32 17.5 11.70 2.00 11.58 20.0 11.56 a
100 11.70 4m ti.70 25.0 10.56 m0 10.1.
- (
5.00 11.70 35.0 9.54 ACCEPTABLE
- a00 t i.70 40.0 as0 OPERATION
~ 7.00 11.70 45.0 8.25 7 1 00 11.70 50.0 7.57 l l 'l 1 00 11.70 55.0 6.08 l l
^
10.0 11.70 57.27 6.51 '
~
'_ , , , , GE13 P9HTB32712GZ 100M-146-T LUA RECON e a to il 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 SE NOTE: AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWd/st)
THISIS THE APLHOR UnsT FOR1E WOS7 UANTING LAT110E AS A FUN 0710N OF AWEl%QE PL# TAR ExFoeunE i
- FIGURE 3-6 l
AVERAGE " LANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE13-P9HTB327-12GZ-100M-146-T-LUA-RECON) 8 Revision 0
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 i Core Operating Limits Report 5:
A _.
~
2 f 5 UNACCEPTABLE EXPOSURE OPERATION
,1 -
""7s8 q s,!
0.00 11.07 N
g 10 -
0.30 11.73 1.00 11.e4 l
5=
!" ;i"
!" ll" N N
{
1" ;i" i= ;;;
ACCEPTABLE OPERATION
(\
. 10.00 12.70 12.50 12.06 7 _ 15.00 12.52
- 20.00 11.91
- 2500 112 h 35.00 e.se GE9B-PSDWB34610GZ-80U-150-T g - 4sm s.7s -
51.71 SM y, s
l AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSU (GWdleQ j uos uwmotArnes AS A i pu am or memos pwm i ex u uns I man. -
FIGURE 3-7 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB346-10GZ-80U-150-T) 9 Revision 0
1 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 ,
Core Operating Limits Report i i i i EXPOSURE la cooRomTES -
_ X Y X Y
. ECO R12 12A0 180 _
UNACCEPTABLE ** * '****"
im as" um am OPERATION .00 an ism aa
,, __ am am 17m aae _
4.00 EM 20.00 E0e 6.00 1 81 25.00 EST E00 RST 30.00 1 14 10 7.00 9.73 36.00 7.71 -
&OD 4000 7
, .m .Est M . m 30, 10.00 10.03 50.00 E43 g '
11.00 EM M21 106 -
t
- ACCEPTABLE q r OPERATION ,
i ....- -,4 .14 1 s ,
1 I I I I a = <a is 30 as 30 as e a ao NOTT.: AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWaput) wasonearmaR uns? PoRne MOST UmTING LA7710E AS A PUNF'M OF AVERedE PLANAR sxposunE j
l i
l l
1 FIGURE 3-8 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE l VERSUS i AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE l (Fuel Type: GE12-P10HSB331-6G5.0/4G4.0-100T-150-T) l 10 Revision 0
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 4.0 MCPR LIMIT (Technical Specification 3.2.2)
The MCPR operating limit (OLMCPR) is a function of core power, core flow, average i scram time, fuel type, number of operating recirculation loops, operability of the end-of-cycle recirculation pump trip (EOC-RPT) system, and operability of the turbine bypass l valves.
With both recirculation pumps in operation (TLO), the OLMCPR for each fuel type with various combinations of equipment operability, scram times, core flow and core power is I determined as follows: I
- a. For 25% s power < 30%, the OLMCPR is given in Figure 4-1.
- b. For power 2 30%, the OLMCPR is the greater of either:
- 1) The flow-dependent MCPR limit determined from the applicable mammum core
{
flow limit line ofFigure 4-2, '
or 1
- 2) The product of the values from Figure 4-1 and the applicable Figures 4-3 and 4-4 as determined by Table 4-1.
As stated in the note on Figures 4-3 and t-4, with one recirculation pump operating (SLO), the calculated OLMCPR determined above is increased by 0.01.
In Figures 4-3 and 4-4, Option A scram time MCPR limits correspond to t = 1.0, where t is determined from scram time measurements performed in accordance with Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirements 3.1.4.1 and 3.1.4.2. Option B values correspond to t = 0.0. For scram times between Option A and Option B, the MCPR limit for each fuel type corresponds to T. If t has not been determined, Option A limits are to be used. Refer to Table 4-1 to determine the applicable set of fuel-type dependent curves.
I1 Revision 0
l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report l The average scram time of the control rods, T, is defmed as:
1 Tm - TB t = 0,or , whichever is greater.
TA-Ts where: TA = 1.08 sec (Technical Specification 3.1.4, Table 3.1.4-1, scram time limit to notch 36).
1/2 Ni is = +1.65
- o * ,
[N,
,, ist ,
where: = 0.822 sec (mean scram time used in the transient analysis).
o = 0.018 sec (standard deviation of p).
fNit im = '"!
E, Ni where: n = number of surveillance tests performed to date in the cycle.
Ni = number of active control rods measured in the ith surveillance test.
ti = average scram time to notch 36 of all rods in the ith surveillance test.
Ni = total number of active rods measured in Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.1.4.1.
1 i
I 12 Revision 0 l
\
1 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report I
TABLE 4-1 l l
I OPERATING FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS APPLICABILITY WITH: USE: l EOC-RPT Turbine Bypass Valves -
Operable Operable Figure 4-3 Inoperable Operable Figure 4-4 Not licensed for this Operable Inoperable operating cycle Not licensed for this Inoperable Inoperable operating cycle NOTE: Operation within the licensed power / flow region with a single recirculation loop and intermittent operation with reduced feedwater temperature are included in the MCPR limits presented in Figures 4-3 and 4-4.
13 Revision 0
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 2.6
>50% FLOW 2.5 -
I
'/ CPERATpio U8ST 80CPR(P)e Kp
- OPERATING Utsff BICPR(100) l FOR P
- 25% NO THERMRL ulsTS 800NfTOR980 REQU4 RED 14 #
NO UtgrTS SPECIPIED j FOR 25% g P 4 P awaas (WHERE P ewaas e 30% POR HNP = 1,2) ~
i Ke n (Kaw + 0.8200% . P)) i OUACPR (100)
AND 2.3 - l Kan = 2.se PoR g se% CORE Plow i
8 -
t Kaw = 2A0 POR
- st% Cofts PLOW FOR 30% g P < 45%
E 12 !
N Ke = 1.2s + o.e134 (4s% . PI i FOR 43% g P 4 00W ~
ait 2 n.
kSO% FLOW Ke m ias
- o.coes7(so%.P) v$
- n. u.
2.1 - '
i FoR 60% 5 P:
K, = 1.o + e.oos7s (1oe%. P)
Vl * . I
$ 2.0 !
b
- u. 1.59 1.4 I
_ l k
\
1.3 -
l l
_ i i i
.2
\
1.1 - ,
i j
l
' lN li P ***i'i 1.0 , , , , , , , i i ,
N 6 i . i i 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 SO 90 100 POWER (% RATED)
FIGURE 4-1 MCPR MULTIPLIER (Kp) VERSUS CORE POWER 14 Revision 0
4 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 1.7
_ MAXs4UGd PLOW RATE a
~
117 %
~ POR Wc (% RATED CORE FLOW)
- 40%
112 %
( heCPRy n( AgW,i100 + By )'[1+0.0032 (40. W,)]
~
N 107%
FOR We (% RATED CORE FLOW)a 40%
ascPR pm asAx (12o, A,W, t too + s, )
1.5 ' * ' N 117A .eA32 1, sos
, 112A 4A02 1,747 197A . ease issy 1.4 102A eA71 14ss W
- N,KN '
1.3 NN i
1.2 1.1 i . . ... ....... ..... ..... 4 i i 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 CORE FLOW (% rated)
FIGURE 4-2 MCPR LIMITS (MCPRr) VERSUS CORE FLOW 15 Revision 0
l 1 ,
I 1 ,
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 1.42
" GE12 s s - "
5.as -
8 " -------
t,a "
GE13 k **
g [s #
8 1.32 E 12 b ----- 7 5
l'"_ __ f GE9B -#
i N
p.-
im
$.34 l 1.22 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0,4 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 TAU (t)
NOTE: For SLO, increase the MCPR Limit obtained from this figure by 0.01.
1 FIGURE 4-3 MCPR LIMIT VERSUS AVERAGE SCRAM TIME (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable andEOC-RPTSystem Operable) l l
i 16 Revision 0
l
\
l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report
{
l 1A2 ,
l 1.8 E42 q p-s
$ 1.=
d
" l
[ 1.44
~
g #~ GE13 ------
% p- 7 31A2 ~
2 #
h1A a s #' l
~
- GE9B 7 51.= \ w r s#
p 1.34 121 1.3 1.25 0 0.1 03 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.7 OJ 0.5 t TAU (t)
NOTE: For SLO, increase the MCPR Limit cbtained from this figure by 0.01.
~
FIGURE 4-4 MCPR LIMIT AS FUNCTION OF AVERAGE SCRAM TIME (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable andEOC-RPTSystem Inoperable) 17 Revision 0 J
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report 5.0 APRM FLOW BIASED SIMULATED THERMAL POWER - HIGH Time Constant (Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.1.14)
The allowable value for the APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power - High time constant is 5; 7.0 seconds.
6.0 REFERENCES
- 1. " General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel," NEDE-24011-P-A 111, November 1995.
- 2. Letter, L. P. Crocker (NRC) to W. G. Hairston (GPC), " Issuance of Amendment No.168 to Facility Operating License DPR-57 and Amendment No.106 to Facility Operating License NPF Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 (TAC Nos.
73614 and 73615)," December 29,1989.
- 3. " Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1, Reload 16, Cycle 17," General Electric Document 24A5353, Revision 0, March 19%.
- 4. "Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 SAFER /GESTR - LOCA Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis," NEDC-31376-P. December 1986.
l l
l l
18 Revision 0 l
- _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ __