ML20106E297
| ML20106E297 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1992 |
| From: | UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20106E281 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9211060315 | |
| Download: ML20106E297 (9) | |
Text
_.
ULNRC-2715
)
^
I ATTACHMENT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES I
9211060315 921030 Attachment'to OL1135.
PDR ADOCK 05000483
. P PDR
J 4
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.2 ORGANIZATION (Continued) l UNIT STAFF 6.2 2 The Unit organization shall be subject to the following:
e.
Each on duty shift shall be. composed of at least the minimum 51ft cre4 4.omposil. ion shown fa Table 6.2-1; b.
At least one itcensed Operator shall be in the control room when fuel is in the reactor.
In addition, while the unit is in MODE 1, 2, 3 or 4, at least one licensed Senior Operator shtll be in the control room; An individual from the Health Physics organization #, qualified in c.
radiation protection procedures, shall be on-site when fuel is in the reactor; d.
All CORE ALTERATIONS stall be observed and directly sucarvised by either a licensed Senior Operator or licensed Senior Operator Limited to Fuel Hu.dling who has '.1o ot;ier concurrent responsibil-ities during this operation; e.
A site Fice Brigade of at least five membersi shall be maintained onsite at all times.
The Fire Brigade shall not include the Shif t Supervisor, and the two cther memoers of thF minimum shif t crew necessary for safe shutdown of the unit and any personnel required for otner essential functions during a fire emergency; f.
Administrative procedures shall be developed and implemented to limit the working hours of unit staff who perform safety-related functions; e.g., licensed Senior Operators, lice,.ied operaters, health physics personnel, equipment operators, and key maintenance pe rs o nne'..
The a:nount of overtime worked 'y Unit staff members pe-fonning safety-related functions shall be limited in accordance with the NRC Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter No. 82-12);
l and g.
The Superintendent. Operations e th: ?,::i;t r.
Supe-4+e H.
-Opernic% Shif t Supervisors,I and Operating Supervisors shall hold a senior react.:r operator license. The-Unit Reactor Operator shall hold a reactor operator license or a senior reactor operator license.
- May be less than the minimum requirements for a period of time not to exceed l
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to -accommodate unexpected absence provided imediate action is taken to fill the required positions.
CALLAWAY - UNIT 1 6-2 Amendment No. 37
s F
i ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS f.2 QPGANIZATION (Continued)
_t)fil.T STAFF 6.2.2 The Unit organization shall be subject to the following a.
Each on duty shif t shall be composed of Lt least the minimum shif t crew composition shown in Table 6.2-1; b.
At least one licensed Operator shall be in the control room when fuel is in the reactor. In addition,- while the unit is in MODE 1, 2,3 or 4, at least one licensed Senior Operator shall be in the control room:
An individual fr,.m the Health Physics organization #, qualified in radiation c.
protection procedures, shall be on site when fuelis in the reactor; d.
All CORE ALTERATIONS shall be abserved and directly supervised by either a licensed Senior Operaar or licensed Senior Operator Limited to Fuel Handling who has no other concurrent responsibilities during this operation:
'e.
A site Fire Brigade of 4 least five members # shall be maintained onsite at dll timos. The Fire Brigade shall not include the Shif t Supervisor, and the l:
two other morn, rs of the minimum shift crew necessary for safe '
l shutdown of t.
unit and any personnel required for other essential L
functions during a fire emergency.
f.
Administrative procedures shall be developed and impleinented to limit the working hours of unit staff who perform safety-related functions; e.g.,
licensei Senior Operators, licensed Ooerators, health physics personnel, equipment operators, and key maintenance personnel.
The amount of overtime worked by Unit staff members performing safety-related functicns shall be limited in accordance with the NRC L
Policy Statement on working hours (Generic Letter No. 82-12); and i=
g.
The' Superintendent,- Operations, Shift Supervisors, and Operating-Supervisors shall hold a senior reactor operator license. The Unit Reactar Operator shall hold a reactor operator license or a unior reactor operator license.
I r
-# May be le_ss than the minimum requirements for a petiod of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to ' accommodate unexpected absence provided immediate action is taken to fill the required positions.-
CALLAWAY.-_ UNIT _1-2 Amendment No. 37 o
a..
m..
2
ULNRC-- 2 715
. j
- e
- 1 l
1 i
j ATTACHMENT 2 SAFETY EVALUATION l
I,-
e
':',h ',
s
+'
2 a
y.
y p
4 e
= --,
em y
--.. ~. -.,....
~
ULNRC-2715-
-Page 1 of 1
SAFETY EVALUkrION This amendment application' requests a revi>aan to Technical l
Specification 6.2.2.gLto delete'che phrase "or m_ Asr'1 tant Superintendent,-Operations."
The~ Assistant _Sup tntendent, Operations position has been eliminated.
l The proposed change has been evaluatad and determined to-
]
have no adverse impact on the ability of plant personne? to I
perform their responsibilities.
The proposed chance to Technical Specification Section 6-does not involve an unreviewed safety question because operation 3
of the Callaway Plant with this change would not:
1.
Increase the probability of occurrence or; consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment importan. to safety I
previously evalented in the safety analysis report.
The proposed change does not affect accident initiators _or assumptions.
The radiological-consequences of any_ accident previously evaluated renain unchanged.
4 1
2 Create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any previously evaluated in the safety analysis report.
The preoosed change does not create any new accident initiators nor involve any modifications or changes in.the splant.
d 3.
Reduce-the margin cf safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification.
H The proposed change does affect any_ safer.y imits or bounda7y or system performance-The proposed change does not reduce the overall-base of experience at the Callaway_ Plant nor the commitment to minimum' qualifications.
The duties, reporting relationships, and approval responsibilities are not altered.
Callaway Plant J
persennel will continue to have the training,-Lexperience,-and-expectise necessary to recognize, analyze, assess, evaluate, and effectively respond to plant transients.or other'abnorma' events.
Given the above discussions, as _well as ;those prm mted in.
l c
the Significant. Hazards Consideration, the proposed c ing-e does not adversely affect or endanger the health or safety of the-general public or involve-a significant safety-hazard.
p.
l L
. =.
.u
m-
~. _. ~ _ __. - - _. _ _ _ _. _. -.. _ _. _ _ - -
-_-_.. _ -3.;7_ _ _,__...___,
t
- ULNRC-2715 ;-
i S..'
.i 4
g u..-
I l:
_.+
3 f'
E ATTAClh:NT 3 i.
)
h SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION j.'
?
k j-i
'g.
9 e
l l
i '
s
-. h I
L 1
)
b l
~:
4
.l
+
W P""
- "*t**h.
eret +-w-14 w ww Mw v v e, we -vir,t m es,er
%.,,,,,-ir,w,we,w,%,,
,,....,y s,,,,a_.
,m...,,y,,,
,,.y,,.y
_m, g
.- -. - - -... - - ~
~ _ -
.~
c t
4 ULNRC47151
-1 i
LAttachmentE3:
-j Page 1 of - i
~;
- m. - t SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION
_ q This:r.mendment application requests a revision to Technical-
'SpecificationL6.2,2.g to delete the phrase "for the' Assistant.
Superintendent, Operations."
The Assistant 1 Superintendent, j
' Operations positivn has been~ eliminated
~
i The proposed change has been= evaluated-and determined to d
have no adverse impact on the ability of plan? personnel to
- perform their responsibilities.
The proposed change to Technical Specification Table 6.-2-1 6
does not involve a significant hazards consideration because operation of the Callaway Plant with this change'trould not:
1.
Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident praviously evaluated.
The change does-not affect accident initiators cr assumptions.
The radiological consequences of any accident previously evaluated remain unchanged.
2.
Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
The proposed change does not create-any new accident.
initiators nor involve any modifications or changes in.the plant.-
3.
Involve a significant reduction ir a margin of safety.
The proposed change will not affect.any-safetyL11mits-or boundary or system performance.
5 3
The proposed change does not reduce.the1overall base of experience at the Callaway_ Plant nor the commitment: to minimum qualifications.
.The-duties, reporting relationships, and-approval responsibilities are not altered.
Callaway Plant personnel will-continue to have the training,' experience, and.
expertise necessary to recognize, analyze, assess,feval'uate, and' effectively l respond to plant-transients or other abnormal. events.
As discussed above, the~ proposed change'does notuinvolveia significantgincrease in the probability ortconsequences of'an-accident previously-evaluatedW create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated,_or.
result in a1significant reduction in a margin:of1 safety.
Therefore, it has been determined that_the proposed change-does
- not. involve-a significant hazards. consideration.
T m._
e
/J y
f n--g
.p.
+ -. -
- r y-r.+,eg-g g.b*-'
I*NY a*~--
F T
t
+*4-
"*NTT-
"*MME
c
~.-
.7..
..,.~.
... l '
4;
..ULNRC-37151 4;
'r s
ATTACHMENT 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION a
-. [
+
F 1
j.
i i
.J_.
t kk
,,?
\\ :'
i
(_'
J a:
a
(.'.
it;
- =..
I N) y-y y
y-s,+-e e-,-n
(
w
,b...
..~a w
.c w-e e
y
... -.~.
~ ~ ~.. -. -... - - --~-
~.
4'
- ULNRC-2 715 L-AttachmentL4
-Page 1 of 1 4
B" ~RO.NM_ ENTAL CONSIDERATION-This amendment application requests a revision to Technical-
_ Specification 6.2.2 9 to delete the-phrase ~"or the Assistanti
' Superintendent, Operations."
The Assistent Superintendent, Operations position has'been eliminated.
The proposed amendment invo'ves a change to the administrative controls on plant personnel located within the
-i restricted area as defined in 10 CFR 20.
Union Electric has determined that the proposed amendment does not involve:
1)
A significant hazard consideration, as discussed in of this amendment application; 2)
A significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite; 3)
A significant increase in individual or. cumulative occupational' radiation exposure.
Accordingly the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion: set forth-in 10 CPR 51.22 (c) (9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22 (b) no environmental-impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
+
L l'
.