ML20101T217
| ML20101T217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1984 |
| From: | Morgan R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101T216 | List: |
| References | |
| RSEP-84-560, NUDOCS 8502060050 | |
| Download: ML20101T217 (2) | |
Text
r 1 p ; !...
G-Form 234 Casolina Power & Light Company H. B. ROBI$4N$$d5 E3@gIq 3LANT company correspondence POST OFFICE BOX 790 HARTSVILLE, SolfrH CAROLINA 29550 SEP 141984 Robinson File No:
13510E Serial:
RSEP/84-560 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Ceorgia 30323
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT 2 DOCKET No. 50-261 LICENSE NO. DPR-23 l
IE INSPECTION REPORT IER-84-26 Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) has received and reviewed the subject report and provides the following response.
Severity Level IV Violation (IER-84-26-02-SL4) 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion II, as implemented by Section 1 of the licensee's Corporate Quality Assurance Program, requires that activities af fecting the quality of safety-related systems and components be accom-p11shed under suitably controlled conditions.
Contrary to the above, as of July 21, 1984, suitable controls were not established during removal of containment sump debris screens in that protective measures were not established to prevent entry of foreign l
material into the suction piping of both Residual Heat Removal Pumps.
Response
1.
Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation CP&L acknowledges the alleged violation.
1 2.
Reason for the Violation l
A misunderstanding contributed to the violation.. A request by contract piping inspectors to remove the RHR debris screens was mis-understood to be the screens at the bottom of the polar crane wall.
h2 f0 0
g. 8,.
c.* Lethe t;t' Mr. J me3 P. O'R3111y Seiic13-RSEP/84-560 P ga 2
' Plant personnel, thinking the polar crane wall screens were involved, directed. the workers to go to containment and remove the screens for the piping inspector. They were also told to leave these screens of f
~ because they were to be replaced during the current outage. However, 1the piping inspectors directed the workers to remove the RHR suction debris screens.
Removal of the RHR suction debris screens should have required a Work Request form with reviews which would have ensured the appropriate controls while the RHR suction pipe was open. The screens were replaced when this was brought to the attention of ' Plant management.
3.
Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken The person responsible has been counseled on ensuring clear communications for work to be done on the appropriate use of Work Requests which would
~
have ensured that appropriate precautions were established.
4.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken The RHR containment sump suction piping will be checked for foreign material that may have entered while the screens were removed.
5.
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The check for foreign material will be performed prior to leaving cold shutdown following fuel loading.
If you have _any questions concerning this response, please contact my staff or me.
Yr19 R. E.'Mo an Gend'ral nager H. B. R n SBG Plant FMG/tk t
w-