ML20101S211

Proposed Revised Tech Specs Re Section 7 on Organizational Changes

ML20101S211
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	01/14/1985
From:	PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To:
Shared Package
ML20101S145	List: ML20101S141 ML20101S211
References
NUDOCS 8502050292
Download: ML20101S211 (7)

Text

T Proposed Changes 8502'50292 850114 PDR.. DOCK 05000267 PDR P

4 4

Fort St. Vrain #1 Technical Specifications Amendment Page 7.1-8 i

i and response and' analysis of the plant for transients and accidents. An initial training'and retraining program for the Technical ~ Advisors shall be maintained under the direction of the. Training Supervisor.

The' Technical Advisors shall also receive training in plant design and layout, including the capabilities of instrumentation and controls in the Control Room.

i Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC, Specification AC 7.1.2

' Administrative Controls The org iization, responsibilities, and atthority of the PORC shall be as foilows:

1.

Membership The Plant Operations Review' Committee shall be composed of the following:

Chairman: Station Manager Technical / Administrative Services Manager l

Support Services Manager Superintendent of Operations Superintendent of. Maintenance Superintendent of Nuclear Betterment Engineering-Health' Physics Supervisor

1

4

~

Fort St. Vrain #1>

Technical Specifications Amendment Page.7.1-13

'4 AC 7il.3 e)~ Instrumentation and' Control f) Radiological Safety g) Mechanical and Electrical Engineering h)- Quality Assurance Practices

.1) (Other. appropriata fields associated with the' unique characteristics of the nuclear power plant.)

2.

Membership The NFSC shall be composed af the following:

. Chairman: _Vice_ President,-ElectricLProduction l

Executive Staff Assistant, Electric Production Manager, Nuclear Production Division Manager, Nuclear Engineering Division i

Manager, Quality Assurance Division

-Manager, Risk Management

' Consultants,~as required and appointed by the Chairman s

3.

~ Alternates

'An~ alternate ~ chairman-and-alternate members, if-required,'shall

~-

be appointed;in writing by the

-e 9

FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ADMINISTRATIVE AND DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION CHART President and Chief Executrve Othcer I

Senior Vice President Operaims l

Vice President Electric NFSC Producten l

I I

I I

I Executwe Staff Manager Manager Manager Manager y'"'9"'

Manager Assistant Quality Nuclear Metro Regional Nuclear Production Electric Assurance Engineering Production Production Production Semices Dwison Product.on Dwrsion Dwrsion Division Dwision Dwisson l

I Technical /

Support Staten Mmmratwo Services Manager Services Manager Manager "

Fort St. Vrain Fort St. Vrain NFSC - Nuclear Facility Safety Committee PORC Plant Operations Review Committee

" Serves as the Radiation Protection Manager PORC ea$$

$# na FIGURE 7.1 - 1

[rn

-!Es a co or D

2 S

FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION CONOUCT OF OPERATIONS CHART Manager Nuclear Production i

I Staten Technscall Support Manager Adnunseteatrve Services Services Mw ' ~

SLO' Manager PORC 1

1 I

Supermtendent Superintendent Nuclear Supesintendent Operatens Betterment Maintenance SLO' Engmeeting I

I I

Results Stutt Technical Health Results SNI' S '

Tr %

IbC Supervisors Services E

SY' 3"P"""

S A

' ion SLO T anung

,so, S

I I

Reactor Equipment Operators _

Aussary Technical Operators LO

• Either the Station Manager or the Superintendent of Operations M possess a Senew License FIGURE 7.1 -2 e

i

" Serves as the Radiation Protection Manager

• s !I un PORC - Plant Operations Review Committee M "g f[

SLO - Senior Licensed Operator 7*35 LO - Licensed Operator t$22 =V

&3 Cg

?.

J

l Significant Hazards Considerations

'i

~

7;,

. - + -

E

~

s g

to P-85009

.Significant Hazards Considerations Since the proposed changes-to Section 7.1 of the Fort St. Vrain

- Technical Specifications are administrative in nature, no significant-safety hazar'ds considerations are involved.

Based on the above,' operation ofl Fort St. Vrain in accordance with the proposed changes will not 1)-involve =a significant' increase-Lin the probability or consequences of.an accident previously evaluated, 2) create the possibility of a.new or different kind of

. accidentifrom any accident previously evaluated, or 3) involve a

~ significant reduction in' a margin of safety.

. l e

b

~

^

~

.