ML20101F019
| ML20101F019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1984 |
| From: | Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101F012 | List: |
| References | |
| 82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8412260478 | |
| Download: ML20101F019 (1) | |
Text
-
21 December 1984 UNITED STATES OF AMEBICA m-w
'BN
. NUCLEAR BEGULATOBY COMMISSION
'34 F 24 A!0:19 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOABD.
Glenn O. Bright hP J2 G d ~sE W J Dr. James H. Carper.ter3W
- James L. Kelley, Chairman
))>
In the Matter of Docket-50-40 OL CAB 0 LINA POWER AND LIGHT CO. et al.
(Shearon Harris Nu: lear Power Plant, Unit 1)
ASLEP No. 82-468-01
)
CE' Wells Eddleman's Motion for Reconsideration of Ruling re Contention 41-E This contention was said to be rejected on the ground of being
" unduly broad" and a " lack (of) specificity" (Tr. 7381.
It was also said to appear to "be a restatement of what we understood 41 to be about*
Tr. 7381-82.
"It talks about pipe hangers, installation, inspection, which is exactly what we spent several days talking about.
Weisee that as, one, lacking in specificity, and two, pretty much of a retread of i
old 41."'
Tr. 7382.
However, proposed contention 41-E is about the non-welding problems with pipe hangers at the Harris plant.
There was considerable discussion in the Contention 41 hearing transcript concerning Staff's and Applicants 8 position that 41 was limited to pipe hanger welding etion of welds. The Board upheld that osition.Seee.g.Tr.Nf and inEo& efcj?D/4 7o2' 9094 '7Dfsg r)207-92">J j
9ool-i Thereare,however,non-weldindinspections(includingfitupand i
og woQ NE' all aspects other than welding) of hangers, performed by the construction l
a0
'E8 inspection (CI) group rather than the QA people who check hanger welds.
,%QjMso u% dassyl seeTe 02:4;yfQ Q*
g, see,e.g.,Tr.QOl$*,
i
$8 The aspects of hangers that are of concern appear to be spec ic
~fd in light of the above information and distinct from contention El as e
heard.
In light of this informat I ask the Board to reconsider cy and admit Contention 41-E.
Q l b~-
Wells Eddleman
. mn.o
~
.