ML20099D432
| ML20099D432 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun, Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/1972 |
| From: | Muller D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20099D115 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9208060014 | |
| Download: ML20099D432 (2) | |
Text
..
r
,-g i
~
o UNITc0 states
\\
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION d'
'j wu, w.cton. o c. rno fiovember 27, 1972 v d,\\
/qu, Gr/ironmental Projects Personnel M2M ADEP PROJECT 20STRUCTIOH~i26 w B 7
GE::ET:lc CO: 'E:17 T:E MD10ACT!YE RELEASES TO UATER FOR ACCIDE!!TS TIMC'! Oil CLnSS S Reference is nr.da to gancric corent l'2 (pages 10-11 of the "Cnoilation of CLncric Con:nts").
This cc u:nt stat as that we shoJ1d describe the environantal effects fro i accide. ital releases (through Citss S) of radioactive matyrials.to wat.r..
This Interior coment was handled in the ferm' FES, and similarly in several other FES, as follcus:
The doses calculated as consequen:es of the postulated A.
accidents are based on airborne transport of radicactive materials resulting in both a direct and an inhalatien dose.
Our evaluation of the accident doses assuries that the applicant's cavit enr.aatal monitoring pregram and appropriate additional r.onitoring (which could be initiated subsequent to an incident detected by in-plant
, monitoring) would detect the presence of radioactivity in the environr.cnt in a tirely manner sucn that remedial action could be taken if necessary to limit exposure frcn other potential pathuays to nan. The scall quantitics of dispersed radioactive material which might enter the food chain would not be significant in terms of endangering aquatic life."
The Fort Calhoun' FES contained the following additional paragraph:
B.
" Radioactive liquid wastes in the Fort Celhoun Station are contained within Class I structures.
Failure of equipnnt within these structures would not lead to a release of racioactive liquid to the environment.
The quantity of low-level liquid radioactive materials' outside Class I structures is very small and release of this mater :
would not affect substantially the envirenrental impact determined for routine operation of the plant."
Until furth;.c notice,' paragraph A above should be used as standard langurcc for DES.
Paragraph G suuld also be included in DES, if appropriate, but " Class I structures" shou!d be changed to read c]-')* Lo fM 920B060014 920716 PDR ORO NRRD PDR
,-n,-
---n--
.--m
.,~-,,,a-n p-
,n..
c o'.-
/*
1 Environ..e,tal Projects Personnel Category 1 structures".
Paragraph B"is appropriate only for pressurized wat?r reactors and may not be correct for all such reactors sin;c 3901icants are not "recuired" to provide Category 1.
structures for radioactive liquid wastes.
In cach case, the Environ =ntel Proja:t anager should establish throc-S the Safety Project lMnager whether liquid wastes are contained uithin Category 1 structures.
1J
,,,.y.. ) /
hhS 4'4 Daniel R. Muller, Assistant Director for Environmental Projects Directorate of Licensing cc:
A. Giambusso J. llendrie R. ledesco r'" " '
H. Denton
(-
V. Benaroya
- 11. Garnaill J. Kastner M. Ernst R. Bal}ard D. Grimes
,4 e
e e
I s-e
,