ML20097B223
| ML20097B223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 08/30/1984 |
| From: | Swartz E COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 83-08, 83-8, 9122N, NUDOCS 8409130518 | |
| Download: ML20097B223 (2) | |
Text
.
N
[
\\ Commonwealth Edison 9
/
) One First National Plaza. Chicago, litinoes
(
} Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 f
Chicago, Illinois 60690
\\
August 30, 1984 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Subject:
Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 10 CFR 50.55(e) Interim Report Duct Fitting Fabrication NRC Docket Nos. 50-456/457 References (a):
E. D. Swartz letter to J. G.
Keppler dated July 29, 1983.
(b):
E.
D. Swartz letter to J. G. Keppler dated October 20, 1983.
Dear Mr. Keppler:
On July 1, 1983, Commonwealth Edison Company notified Mr.
Julian M. Hinds of your office of a deficiency reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e) regarding febrication of Pullman Sheet Metal duct fittings without approved design documents at our Braidwood Station.
References (a) and (b) provided information concerning this matter to fulfill the thirty day reporting requirements and to provide an interim status report.
This deficiency was assigned l
Number 83-08 for your tracking purposes.
The purpose of this letter is to provide an updated status of the corrective actions required to resolve this deficiency.
STATUS OF RESOLUTION Reference (b) stated that the Pullman Sheet Metal Duct Brochure, Revision A, had been given interim approval for site use and was awaiting formal acceptance by Sargent anri Lundy.
Formal acceptance of Revisicn A was received on October 6, 1983.
Reference (b) also projected completion of the Pullman Sheet Metal as-built submittal by May 1, 1984, and that the subsequent reinspections following the Sargent and Lundy as-built review would be completed by Septamber 1, 1984.
The work scope of the' corrective action program has turned out to be much larger in magnitude than we initially anticipated.
We now expect that the-Pullman Sheet Metal as.-built submittals will be completed by mid-January, 1985.
The Sargent and Lundy review of these as-built submittals for conformance with design
[J'iWi"SEj'd SEP 4
f
~
- +. -
.s-T(:t 3
3Y, kh: N b.
Nv
~s ps-se should be complete approximately one renth later.
In parallel, Pullman > Sheet Metal will complete inspection requirements of 1
install'ed ouct and fittings utilizing approved design details.
Based on as-built submittals and reinspections conducted to
-date, it is anticipated that 5-10% of the duct fittings.will require modification to meet design requirements.
Pullman Sheet Metal duct modificationsaand subsequent inspections will be o'
completed commensurate with the Sargent & Lundy review of the as-builts.
All corrective action is being tracked 'tur the Commonwealth Edison Company NCR-540.s nan interim report updating the status of these activities wilh be prepared and submitted by November
- a (
-15, 1984.
}
s Please address any questions that you or your staff may have concerning this matter to this office.
Very truly yo E. Douglas rtz Nuclear Licensing Administrator
'cc:
NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood 1i Director of Inspection and Enforcement
?'
'U.S.
Nuclear-Regulatory Commission
,i Washington, D.C. 20555
.-t s
9122N
/
4
$s (N-t b
- b 9
'4%
w.,
n
,