ML20094R535
ML20094R535 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hatch ![]() |
Issue date: | 10/26/1995 |
From: | GEORGIA POWER CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20094R533 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9512050012 | |
Download: ML20094R535 (23) | |
Text
i I
l i
. 2 l
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EDWIN'I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 FUEL CYCLE 16 CORE OPERATING LLMITS REPORT REVISION 2 i
l 1
I 3
1 2
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201
< l 9512050012 951128 PDR ADOCK 05000321
__.P_.__ _ _.- . .. PDR ..
EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 FUEL CYCLE 16 i CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT EFFECTIVE PAGE LIST Unless noted otherwise, all pages are Revision 1.
4 Page Number Revision 16 2 1
l l
l l
1 1
l l
i i 10/26/95
EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT [
UNIT I FUEL CYCLE 16 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title fast 1
1.0 Introduction 2.0 Rod Block Monitor I 3.0 APLHGR Limit 2 MCPR Limit 11 4.0 APRM Simulated Thennal Power Monitor 18 5.0 ~
Time Constant (',
6.0 References 18 l
(
l ii Revision 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title _P_agg 3-1 MAPFACF 3 3-2 MAPFACp 4 3-3 APLHOR Versus Average Planar Exposure (BP8DRB284H) S 3-4 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB330-10GZ-80M-150-T) 6 3-5 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB315-8G4.0-80M-150-T) 7 3-6 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB314-8G4.0-80M-150-T) 8 3-7 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure (GE9B-P8DWB331-10GZ-80M-150-T) 9 '
3-8 APLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposme ;
(GE13-P9HTB327-12GZ-100M-146-T-RECON) 10 1
( 4-1 Power-Dependent MCPR Multiplier (Kp) 14 4-2 Flow-Dependent MCPR Limits (MCPRF) 15 4-3 MCPR Limit as Function of Average Scram Time 16 (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable and with either EOC-RPTSystem Operable or with EOC-RPT System inoperable up to EOC - 2,000 mwd /st) 4-4 MCPR Limit as Function of Average Scram Time 17 (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable and with EOC-RPT System inoperable during the last 2,000 mwd'st ofthe Operating Cycle) iii Revision 1
~ ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) ( ,
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Ijilg past 4-1 TABLE OF OPERATING FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS 13 APPLICABILITY
(
(
iv Revision I
1 -
EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT i UNIT 1 FUEL CYCLE 16 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
i The Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Plant Hatch Unit 1 Cycle 16 is I prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 5.6.5.
The core operating limits presented herein were developed using NRC-approved
~
methods (References 1 and 2). Results from the fuel vendor's reload analyses for the fuel in Unit 1 Cycle 16 are documented in References 3 and 4.
l The following cycle-specific core operating limits are included in this report:
} a. Control Rod Block Instrumentation - Technical Specification 3.3.2.1.
! b. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) -
Technical Specification 3.2.1.
f c. Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) - Technical Specification 4 3.2.2. and 3.3.2.1.
~
- d. APRM Flow Biased Simulated Thermal Power- High, time
, constant - Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement SR 3.3.1.1.14.
! 2.0 ROD BLOCK MONITOR (Technical Specification 3.3.2.1)
Both Rod Block Monitor (RBM) channels shall be operable as specified in
- Technical Specification 3.3.2.1 and when
i
. a. THERMAL POWER is 2 29% and < 90% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and the MCPR is < l.70.
- or
- b. THERMAL POWER is 2 90% of RATED THERMAL POWER and the MCPR is < l.40.
4 Revision 1
^
l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 .
l %re Operating Limits Report r,
3.0 APLHGR LIMIT (Technical Specification 3.2.1)
The APLHGR limit for each fuel type is given by the applicable rated-power, rated-flow APLIIGR limit taken from Figures 3-3 through 3-8, multiplied by the smaller of either:
- a. The flow dependent multiplier, MAPFAC, from Figure 3-1, or
- b. The power dependent multiplier, MAPFACp from Figure 3-2.
For the fuel types whose APLHGR limits are shown in Figures 3-3 through 3-8, the APLHGR limit shall be applied to each axial location in the fuel assembly.
As required by GESTAR (Reference 1), the hand-calculated APLHGR values for a multi-lattice (i.e., GE9-330, GE9-331, and GE13-LUA) fuel must be less than or equal to the APLHGR limits shown in Figures 3-4,3-7 and 3-8, (
respectively. When APLHGR values are determined by the process computer, the lattice-dependent APLHGR limits are used. Under these conditions, some axial locations may have APLHGR values exceeding the values shown in Figures 3-4,3-7, and 3-8.
(
2 Revision 1
b Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16
. Core Operating Limits Report 1
e e t
$ i I 1.00 l 137%
~
... - 7/ ,,e ,
I - o.es .- - - - - - -
t
[ u ,,
I I i o.s0 -
- mC , . m._ m l
- l. , .,, ,
_.._._..__T, l
l mAPeiyLT e t A POR PLOW > e1% i f e eAe POR PLOW 5 41%
i
! GAPRPD a (P) e RAletfUSA [1.e, A r + B p P )
P= PRACTIO8d 0F RATED ODIE PLOW
- i .
5 CORE PLOW l
(% ItATED) AP Se
- 0.s0 -
in.4 rm r- T wsr-l l 1er.e esets e.even nu esm e. sus ,
1 l ura e. nee eiew l 1 !
'i i 0.40 30 40 50 00! 70 to 90 100 l e1
-l CORE FLOW (% rated) 1
)
i}
. i FIGURE 3-1 ;
MAPFACy I
l 3 Revision 1 i
! 1 l
1 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 -
Core Operating Limits Report i
i l
1.0 i
i 0.9 l
s 0.0 I
l pk
/e SMGLE LOOP OPERATION (SLO) 0.75 .- -------' I s 60% comE PLOW asAPLHost p e taAPPAC p
- ABAPLHOR era g,7 j mAPLHOR sus e 5TANDARD MAPLHGR LatifS FoR 38% , P; NO THEntaAL LitNTS 800ftTORING REotARED (SLO. TLO) NO UteTS SPSCIPIED POR 20% 5 P a 30%:
ABAPPAC , e 0.585
- 9.008334 (P . 30%)
Pon s ses coat eLow l
10.5 ,
l N I
M4PFAC con Poa m s P:(TLo) o m coP= 0A.83 E rto
- 8A.05234 (P 30%)
I I0.s on con m s P < s3%:(Sto) l l mAmc . 54 * . uu iP . im
- 4 W'
, m co.E ,Lo.
con m 5 r: cSLo) mAme ,. ..n 0.4 l l l l l$ l l l 20 25 30 40 80 80 70 80 90 100 POWER (% rated)
FIGURE 3-2 MAPFACp
(
4 Revision I
Plant Hatch Unit i Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report t
,/
4
" i i i ..
~
UNACCEPTABLE ~I t
.< .r '- 9 OPERATION ;.
}
13 .s- ...;. a d_
~
a e .. :..'.y 4 2 y?"l r * ?w r -[,,Y&
j },, ,,l 12 f y
,s.e .;
2 -
f : .y -.*
- y . - . ,..c., .9 l g
,;)
g - Low exposune .
5 11 g coonoimies
- 8 X Y su - -
k - u so.e
- <a
- e. su ACCEPTABLE .J 2.8 112 \ I. - 9
~
4.o it.s OPERATION % ~"~s Si s.o ti.e . '"; j s.s is.s 9 10.0 12.3
. 12.s 12.4 ;;
- sesonsse4H(so un. CHANNELS) 8.s 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 AVERAGE PLANAR EXPO 6URE(GW@st)
FIGURE 3-3 ,
AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: BP8DRB284H) 5 Revision I
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 -
Core Operating Limits Report
[
i l I I 13 ' I
[ 58 '8 UNACCEPTABLE -
j 12 - OPERATION; '
t ~5!
- [ ,,,73 4
.,JN? .>
11! "" '
N
_ coonomates .r
- X Y 10 -. _ e.e it.s to.to k e 11.8e i e St \ ; 'I
.j
- s.o 12.to e.ro ] ;, ,
4.s ts.se
'4 8h ACCEPTABLE ]
- 74 124. OPERATION .,)
7 .. e.e ts.es ts.te $
e.e
\
[
tes ts.se 3, 12.s taas pygt ryPE: 8 fo onesMowes e 1eaz4ess tea-T p
- ste144
.'. .'. W#'t
~
5 t
j wayg. AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWWeQ ES!T ue"sE#$Nr"nYas'a e
F OF AVERAGE PLANAR FIGURE 3-4 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB330-10GZ-80M-150-T)
(
6 Revision 1
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report f
~
,3 L -
( ""
.. UNACCEPTABLE ,
.]
. OPERATION
- 1
- -
J .. $
. 11.79
~
t,0w EXPotufts ~6,3' .
coonomians ;
i - X Y -
. 10.44 =
eA HAs -
"s 10 -
- j 9 SJ 11.92 h ' *
~
12 13.03 . .
4 g', ,
2.0 11.17 ,
. 3.0 11.35 WI .; f l 4.0 13.se l 4
- 58 tus
- s. -
ACCEPTABLE -
.a ns.
- 7.o u.1s OPERATION 9 ',l [
' r. . es un 10A n.n 13.41 h
f 6- -- 12.6 13.80 -
_ FUEL TYPE: GEssMDws3164G4.840M.180-T g.as et
$1.6 4 I
. Owetet 6 8 !
.4 . 4 . . .........i '.i..'
. . . . .' i... .. i i . ...
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 80 AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWest) i a
J FIGURE 3-5 i AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB315-8G4.0-80M-150-T) 7 Revision 1 4
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 .
! Core Operating Limits Report
(
l d
53 h r s se UNACCEPTABLE 1 12 OPERATION 1
tim 9
NN s qq _
_ cmaam .
X Y .g
[5 10 - e.o 1E oJ 114. N s
~
1.o 13.01 .f' Ig >: -
=
sa
'=.
n.u ese '
- 4 44 g
s;_ si is.u is.n ACCEPTABLE es si.u 4
- fa n.s OPERATION f, I 7- . s.e 13.32 T
.4 su. l i.4 iu.
s: _ in n2.
,, g FUEL TYPE: DE95 PSDWBau4G4.0.aetA 180 7 ,, ,1,7 GWeWst 5 .',
, 4 ... ,,
AVERAGE PLANAR EXPO 6URE(GWdist)
FIGURE 3-6 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type: GE9B-P8DWB314-8G4.0-80M-150-T)
(
8 Revision 1
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report f
- p% l l -
-l h 13
_ g 12.se 4 UNACCEPTABLE '
12 12.is k OPERATION ',..
" [ .<. -
.f
(
ts.ss
~.
x
[ ":
t
.)
5 1e . e.2 11.s2 e.rr 1 .7 .;
g ' ~-
g_
5.e 2A it.rs 11.88
.g..)
4 -
3.0 12.17 i
~, 4A 12A1 e- - *A 12As ACCEPTABLE s.11 y -
8.0 12.s0
~_ ** tsA7 OPERATION
- s
- 7. ..- 8.0 13.22 j
{
sA toA 5:22 13.2s u
,,]
,g 4$
12.s 13.13 a
- Futt1YPE: cessssownsat.tecz.cou seo T ,, )
owest 5
l ' ' ' ' '
O 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 '
! NO11: AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GW@st) l@?uk*fn',#tEV"7'L' Lou OF AVERACE PLANAR EXPOSURE 1
FIGURE 3-7
, AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fwel Type: GE9B-P8DWB331-10GZ-80M-150-T) 9 Revision 1
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 , :
Core Operating Limits Report '
i (' t 4
}r.
1 J
- r; 13 ~ . /.! ' il UNACCEPTABLE'. _
sa f i t." OPERATION. 'm- ')
- :====; ~=
,,, .s .
7.m 11.N S *
,, *
- a*
- i'
- - - - ,. a .
4
. sur ... a SJ 11.14 .
N.- (^ i g ,: - -
- 0 :::
- 3. 11.70 4.0 11.70 8.08 M **[ '-;r-o . . . s,. ;
'j ll7,
'~
8:
ACCEPTABLE ,
- as it.n r.)st -' ,9 7-s.s 11.n OPERATION .A iu ii.n 12.s it.n 888 4 d
- S.51 AT
$' d PUEL TYPE: GE13LMA 57J7 m (
l oeimer.nr.im u.co.
s . ,
, g. ..g. .,g . .3 .g....g... g.... ....
....g ...,..
AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (GWest) wore:
Mr*u"."n.,#tM.V.."2.'f." =""
- =,o 4via ru FIGURE 3-8 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE (Fuel Type
- GE13-P9HTB327-12GZ-100M-146-T-RECON) t 10 Revision 1
- . _ . _ . . . .- . . . . _ -_ .-. _~
i
. 1 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Repon 4.0 . MCPR LIMIT (Technical Specification 3.2.2) !
The MCPR operating limit (OLMCPR) is a function of core power, core flow, average scram time, fuel type, number of operating recirculation loops, operability of end-of-cycle recirculation pump trip (EOC-RPT) system, and operability 'of turbine bypass valves.
With both recirculation pumps in operation (TLO), the OLMCPR for each fuel ,
type with various combinations of equipment operablity, scram times, core flow and core power is determined as follows: i For 25% 5 power < 30%, the OLMCPR is given in Figure 4-1.
For power 2 30%, the OLMCPR is the greater of either: ,
j A) The flow-dependent MCPR limit determined from the applicable maximum core flow limit line of Figure 4-2, or B) The product of the values from Figures 4-1 and the applicable Figure 4-3 through 4-4 as determined by Table 4-1.
As stated in the note on Figures 4-3 through 4-4, with one recirculation pump
- increased by 0.01.
In Figures 4-3 through 4-4, Option A scram time MCPR limits correspond to T = 1.0, where t is determined from scram time measurements performed in
< accordance with Technical Specification SR 3.1.4.1 and SR 3.1.4.2. Option B values correspond to t = 0.0. For scram times between Option A and Option B, the MCPR limit for each fuel type corresponds to t. If t has not been ,
determined, Option A limits are to be used. Refer to Table 4-1 to determine the applicable set of fuel-type dependent curves.
i i 11 Revision 1
~
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16
. Core Operating Limits Report 7
The average scram time of the control rods, t, is defined as:
Tave " TB t = 0, or , whichever is greater TA*TB where: T4 = 1.084 sec (Technical Specification 3.1.4, Table 3.1.4-1, scram time limit to notch 36) 1/2 ta = p + 1.65
- a + ,'
[ N'.
where: = 0.822 sec (mean scram time used in the transient analysis) o = 0.018 sec (standard deviation of p) I N
[ Nit, t . = '- '
EN' s.s where: n = number of surveillance tests performed to date in the cycle N i= number of active control rods measured in the ith surveillance test t i= average scram time to notch 36 of all rods in the ith surveillance test N i= total number of active rods measured in Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement SR 3.1.4.1.
k 12 Revision 1
4 Plant H:tch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report
/
l l
l l
TABLE 4-1 TABLE OF OPERATING FLEXIBILITY OPTIONS APPLICABILITY i
! WITH: .
-- USE: <
EOC RPT Turbine Bypass Valves Operable Operable Figure 4-3 ,
Inoperable, BOC to EOC - 2000 Operable Figure 4-3 Inoperable,
. EOC - 2000 Operable Figure 4-4 i to extended EOC Not licensed for this Operable Inoperable operating cycle.
! Not licensed for this Inoperable Inoperable operating cycle.
NOTE:
Operation within the licensed power / flow region with a single recirculation loop and intermittent operation with reduced feedwater temperature are included in the MCPR limits presented in Figures 4-3 through 4-4.
7
. 13 Revision 1 i
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report
['I l l
l 2.s
> 80% FLOW 2.5 -
- OPERAT#ee Literf teCPR(P)e Kp
- 0PERATING Liteff IscPit(see) '
l POR P e RSW 000 TNama4AL LaserTS ns0Nff0Ree0 R50UeREO
- NO LastTs sPEcm 2.4 ~
. POR 28% s P e P eveses (WNERE P owmee e Se% POR HNP .1. 2) l 4 = (Kew + e.ea(sen.P3) s OLascPR ties)
, ANO 2.3 - l mov,. t.se post s ses c0RE PLOW e Keve e IAs POR > 6e% CORE PLOW
~
j POR 30% s P e 46%-
' K,=1.se+e.e134less.P) 2.2 ~
N j POR 45% s P e sek e- K, 1.1s + e.seest (ses.P) k 00% FLOW POR s0% s P:
I1 - K, a 1.s + e.es375 (1e0%. P) w- - l Mb 2.0 I _
h u- 1.59 l f - ,i ,
1.4 g
- l
. .! h 1.3 - l ;
1.2 '
\
~
l . l ,
11- l l l l
_ : P .v j. j j 10 l l . . l , , l . . . . . .' ,
20 25 30 40 60 60 70 00 90 100 POWER (% RATED) l l
l i
FIGURE 4-1 .
't POWER-DEPENDENT MCPR MULTIPLIER (Kp)
I l
k 14 Revision 1 l
l_ _ __- - - _ ___ _ _______ _ - - _ __ _ _ _ ____ - -__ _ _ _-__ - ___ - _ - _ .
l l l
1 Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 i
Core Operating Limits Report l
i - l 4
~
i i i i i pon so.tuamsconsnaur)aaos 11fu nway)emAx(tanusee#sese og ,
~
113 %
1.6 L
,. main- u =
5 111A 4A.S
~
9 eggs 1200 1.5 / 113A ters 4A03 4As.
tJef '
g m taer
- . . 4.,, .
I u \
- \ \
~
u N N ;
1.2
, J Pon m funavsocons naut)em.m
\ x \ :
.c wisium, *=ii mi. n
- j u ;.
3 . . . g . . . g . . . , . , , 4 . . . g . . . ,,, ,
l cone FLowm ene P
FIGURE 4-2 ,
FLOW-DEPENDENT MCPR LIMITS, MCPR(F) 15 Revision 1
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report 1.42 l l l l l l l I l 1A0 GE13 LUA 1.38 ,
1.36 ,
1.34 l l l ! l 1.32 ,
g GE9B g j l l I I g 1.30 1.2s I I
(..
I X l ) l 1.24 l !
I' j i !' I I i 1.22 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 O.0 TAU ( t )
Note: For SLO, increase the MCPR Limit obtained from this figure by 0.01.
FIGURE 4-3 MCPR LIMIT AS FUNCTION OF AVERAGE SCRAM TIME (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable and with either EOC-RPT System Operable or with EOC-RPTSystem Inoperable up to EOC-2,000 mwd /st) ,
(
16 Revision 2
Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16.
- . Core Operating Limits Report r
- I l
4 us -
1A4 I' GetsLuA /
/
/ ,
i j w.
~=
! , /
I
- i. u0
\ @ U*
l E .1.x 5 /
, 5 sets d
y 1.u . \
/
\- 'l- #
,,, / i x / , , se,,
I I
! us 0.8 0.0 1.0
' O.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 OA 0.5 0.8 0.7 l TAU (t )
t L Note: For SLO, increase the MCPR Limit obtained from this figure by 0.01.
)
1 FIGURE 4-4
- MCPR LIMIT AS FUNCTION OF AVERAGE SCRAM TIME i (with Turbine Bypass Valves Operable and with EOC-RPTSystem Inoperable during the last 2,000 mwd /st of the Operating Cycle)
! 17 Revision 1
I
. l Plant Hatch Unit 1 Fuel Cycle 16 Core Operating Limits Report ;
[ l l
5.0 APRM SIMULATED THERMAL POWER MONITOR TIME CONSTANT (Surveillance Requirement SR 3.3.1.1.14)
The allowable value for the APRM Simulated Thermal Power Monitor Time Constant is s 7.0 seconds.
6.0 REFERENCES
- 1. " General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel," NFDE-240l l-
. P-A-10-US, March 1991.
- 2. Letter, L. P. Crocker (NRC) to W. G. Hairston (GPC), " Issuance of Amendment No.168 to Facility Operating License DPR-57 and Amendment No.106 % Facility Operating License NPF Edwin I.
Hatch Nuclear Plant Units I and 2 (TACS 73614 and 73615)," December 29,1989.
(
- 3. " Supplemental Reload Licensing ' Submittal for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1, Reload 15, Cycle 16," General Electric Document 24A5156. Revision 1, January 1995.
- 4. "Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 SAFER /GESTR - LOCA Loss-of Coolant Accident Analysis," NFDC-31376-P, December 1986.
- 5. " Safety Evaluation by the Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation Supporting Amendment Nos.151 and 89 to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5," dated January 22,1988.
k 18 Revision 1
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ . _