ML20094F507
| ML20094F507 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1984 |
| From: | Mangan C NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| (NMP21-114), (NMP2L-0114), (NMP2L-114), 55(E)-84-16, NUDOCS 8408100071 | |
| Download: ML20094F507 (2) | |
Text
-
> ;, ;V NUMOHAWK Y NIAGARA NOAGARA RAOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 July 30, 1984 (NMP2L 0114)
Mr. R. W. Starostecki, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Division of Project and Resident Programs 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410
Dear Mr. Starostecki:
Enclosed is a final report in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) for the problem concerning the swing check valve in the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) turbine exhaust. This problem was reported via telecon to Mr. S. Collins of your staff on April 27, 1984. An interim report was submitted via our letter dated May 23, 1984.
Very truly yours, M
C. V. Manga Vice President Nuclear Engineering & Licensing GG:Ja Enclosure xc: Director of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I
Washington, DC 20555 Project File (2) 8408100071 e40730 PDR ADOCK 05000410 S
PDR lg a st
,a NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET N0. 50-410 Final Report for the Problem Concerning Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Turbine Exhaust Check Valve (55(e)-84-16)
Description of the Problem I.E. Information Notice 82-26 identified concerns with the reactor core isolation cooling turbine exhaust check valves encountered in some operating boiling water reactors.
Correspondence with the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 supplier of the turbine exhaust check valves (Velan) has indicated that the standard swing check valve used at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 is not suitable for this application.
Analysis of Safety Implications Failure of the subject valve could have caused water from the suppression pool to flood the turbine or block the exhaust line. As a result, the safety-related reactor core isolation cooling system could have been rendered inoperative.
If this problem were to have remained uncorrected, it could have adversely affected the safety of operations of the plant.
However, assuming loss of the reactor core isolation cooling system and a single failure, the reactor could be safely shut down.
Corrective Action The problem will be corrected by replacing the standard swing check valve with a special design lift check valve. The replacement will be completed prior to preoperation testing.
.e a..?
5...,
< I L L.
_