ML20092N224
| ML20092N224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1992 |
| From: | UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092N222 | List: |
| References | |
| ULNRC-2566, NUDOCS 9203020026 | |
| Download: ML20092N224 (5) | |
Text
e ULNRC-2566 ATTACHMENT 4 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF 30 APPENDIX B PAGE MARK-UPS Table of Contents Page 2-1 Page 4-2 Page 4-3
- 883olB8?R8888$33 P
c ;.....,
J ss?.
i i
e 1
- ).
CALLAWAY PLANT UNIT 1
)
i ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) l TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pace 1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan......
1-1 2.0 Environmental-Protection Issues..............
2-1 2.1. - Aquatic Issues-2-1 2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2-1 2.3 Cultur:1 Rescur ::
3.0 Consistency Requirements 2-1 3-1 3.1. Plant Design and Operation 3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit and State Certification....................
3-2 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations.................
3-3 n).'
4.0 Environmental Conditions 4-1 j
4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events.........
4-1 i
4.2 Aerial Remote Sensing...................
4-1 4.3 Cu l tu r t', ncscurtt:
4-5.0 Administrative Procedures.................
5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5-1 5.2 Records Retention..........-...........
5-1 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan 5-1 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5-1
+
'h
' ^
,o t
2.0 Environmental Protection Issues In the FES-OL dated January, 1982, the staff considered the environmental impacts associated with the operation of Callaway Plant.
Certain environ-mental issues were identific$ which required study or license conditions to resolve environmental concerns and to assure adequate protection of the environment.
2.1 Aquatic Issues No specific aquatic issues were raised by the staff in the FES-OL.
2.2 Terrestrial Issues The specific terrestrial issue raised by the staff in the FES-OL 1s the need to undertake a limited-term terrestrial monitoring program by means of infrared aerial photography with accompanying ground truth aimed at monitor ing the impact of cooling tower drift on the local flora.
(FES-OL: Section 5.5.1.6) ra! Resources There is a need to. pro cultural resources sites-w are lochted in the area of potential environmen et r tenance of the plant and associa pte o the operation and main-
.tnd which have also been j
identified in the survey entially eligible o ational Register e
of Historic Plasts requirements with regard to the cu are specified'in Subsection 4.3 of Fls environmental protection plan.
sources
/
r
--r'
- ' ' ' ~ ~
.. l.... h b
ya m
~
\\ q Cultural Resources hq June 3,1983, the NRC received two reports related to the. cultur A.
re urces survey of the Callaway site. The reports are entitled, A Phas 1 Cultural Resources Survey and Assessment on Residual La> s at r
Union ctric Company's Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Calla fCounty, Missouri pril, 1983," and "A Cultural Resources Manageme lan for Residual L s at Union Electric Company, Callaway Nuclea ower Plant, Callaway Cou
, Missouri." The reports were prepared American Resources Group Ltd. and identified three cultural r ource sites wh;ch are potent y eligible for the National P.eg ter and are located in the area of pote ia? environmental impact rel.ed to the operation and maintenance of th lant and associated fac ities.
The NRC requires the lice 5 e to provide th/NRC with infomation neces-sary to initiate a determina ion of eligipility request for sites 23CY20, 23CY352 and 23CY359. The lice (ee will repare such infomation in con-sultation with the State Historit Pre rvation Officer (SHPO) and will obtain from the SHP0 an opinion re ding the potential eligibility of the three sites for inclusion in e "ational Register of Historic Places.
Upon receipt and review of t infomatio the NRC will f9rward the mate -
rials to the' Keeper of the tional Registe for action.
If the Keeper rules the sites are not gible, the finding ill be filed and this sec-tion of the EPP is full satisfied with no furt r action required.
If the Keeper rule hat any of the sites are eligi '
for the National Register, the NR requires the licensee to provide th
'RC with infor-mation necessar to comple;e a determination of effect w ich the operation and maintena e activities may have on the eligible sites.
The licensee will folic the steps outlined in 36 CFR 800.4 and 36 CFR 80 3 in developi the information.
Upon receipt of the infomation,, e NRC, in cone tation with the SHPO, will complete the determination o. effect proca s.
If-the detemination-results in a no effect finding as p vided in 6 CFR 800.4b,1, the documentation will be filed and this section f e EPP is fully satisfied with no further action required.
4-2
+
0
s 1.o,.
p.,
.; e' c
)
f the determination results in an effect finding, this conclusion will e
s orted by an analysis and adequate documentation.
An appropriate A. tion prog m, which the licensee has developed in consultation with the fiP0 and the NRC.(gon review of the program, the NRC will forward thin by the SH concur ocumentation to the Advis Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) for omment.
Af ter ACHP commen is received by the NRC, the program 111 be revised, if necessary, to incor rate coments received. The li. nsee shall then pro-ceed, in consultation pletionoftheprogram,(ath the SHP0, to implement e program.
Upon com-eport shall be submi+ sed to the NRC which will include a description of th results of the a ogram and the disposition of data recovered (if applicable Upon subm.tal of this report and acceptance by NRC, this section cf the EPP '
full Aiatisfied with no further action requi red.
S.
The NRC will provide the Interaa, cy Ar ological Service (IAS) of the U. S. Department of Inter',r two reporM (survey and management plan) identified in item A of thiytPP and the revtsy coments of the Missouri State Historic Preservatip11 Office and the lice ee's responses to the comments.
/
The IAS will be rr ted to review the information a resent the NRC with an opinio us to the findings and the proposed cour of~ action.
If the HRC is a ised by IAS that there are additional sites w *hin the area
)2 of poten environmental impact related to the operation an maintenance of the ant and associated facilities which are potentially eli 'ble for the icaal Register of Historic Places, the licensee will be requ' ed to rnish information for such sites as outlined in Item A of this s. -
- j
[1on of the EPP.
\\
l l
l a-3
]
1 l
.