ML20092M785
| ML20092M785 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1992 |
| From: | PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092M783 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9202280129 | |
| Download: ML20092M785 (6) | |
Text
__
PBAPS-6.5.1.6 ' Continued i.
Review of the Plant Security Plan, and shall submit recommended changes to the Plan to the Plant Manager and the Nuclear Review Board.
8 j.
Review of the Emergency Plan, and shall submit recommended changes to the Plan to the Plant Manager and the Nuclear Review Board.
k.
Review of every unplanned release reportable under 10CFR 50.72 and 50.73, of radioactive material to the environs; evaluate the event; specify remedial action to prevent recurrence; and document the event description, evaluation, and corrective action and the disposition of the corrective action in the 2
plant records.
Authority 6.5.1.7 The Plant Operations Review Committee shall:
Recommend in writing, to the Plant Manager, for his approval or a.-
disapproval of items considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (d) above.
i b.
Render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered ur. der 6.5.1.6(b) through (e) above l
constitutes an unreviewed safety que: Lion, as defined in 10 CFR t,
50.59.
4 c.
Provide immediate written..atification to the Vice President, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, or in his absence, the Senior Vice President - Nuclear and the Nuclear Review Board of l
disagreement between the PORC and the Plant Manager; however, the Plant Manager shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.
~
L I'-
-248-4-w u
l 9202280:29 920221
$DR ADOCK 05000277 PDR E
g__ __
PBAPS c.
Audit reports encompassed by-Section 6.5.2.8 above, shall be forwarded to the Senjor _Vice President-Nuclear, and to the management positions responsible fcr the l
areas audited within 30 days after completion of the audit.
6.5.3 Procedure Review and Accroul
-6.5.3.1 Each new procedure and procedure change shall be reviewed by a Station Qualified Reviewer (SQR) and then by a Superintendent designated as responsible _for the procedure. Administrativeprocedures(andchanges thereto) shall be reviewed by PORC prior to approval by the Plant Manager or
.his designated alternate in accordance with Specification 6.1.1 Tne SQR she.ll not be the individual who prepared the new procedure or procedure change, he may however be from-the same organization as the preparer. In addition to
. performing procedure reviews, the responsible Superintendents shall ensure that a sufficient complement of SQR's for their functional area is maintained.
PORC shall have the cption to review new procedures or procedure changes without the prior review and approval of the SQR and responsible Superintendent.
Procedures reviewed in this manner will be approved by the Plant Manager.
- 6. 5. 3. 2_
Unless Mreempted by PORC as described in 6.5.3.1, the SQR shall review each new proceNre or procedure change. The SQR shall render a determinaticn in writing of whether or not a cross-disciplinary review of the new procedure or procedure change is necessary.
If such a review is determined to be necessary, it shall be performed by the appropriate personnel. Upon completion of the SQR review, each new procedure or procedure change shall be reviewed by the Superintendent designated by Administrative procedures as the responsible Superintendent for that procedure. The Superintendent sht 1, as part of his review, decide whether or not a 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluation is required.
If a Saf ety Evaluation is not required, the new procedure or procedure change snail te approved by the responsible Superintendent er tne Plant Manager prior to implementation.
o.5.3.3 If the responsible Superintendent determines that a new procedure or procedure change requires a 10 CFR 50.59 Ssfety Evaluation, the responsible Superintendent shall render a determination in writing of whether or not the 1
new procedure or procedure change involves an Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ).. The responsible Superintendent shall then forward the new procedure or procedure change with the associated Safety Evaluation to PORC for review.
If-an USQ is involved, prior NRC approval is required per 10 CFR 50.59 before
-implamentation of the new procedure or procedure change.
i 6 5:3.4-Personnel recommended to perform tne function o' SQR shall be approved and designated as such by the PORC Chairman. The SQR shall be an individual from the responsible organization and knowledgeable in the functional area affected.
Tne individual shall meet the qualifications of ANSI /ANS-3.1-1951, Selection - Qualification and Traininc of Personnel for Nuclear Power Piants, Section 4, excluding subst.ctions 4.3.2 and 4.5.
Individuals who do not-
[
l possess the formal educational requirements specified shall not be L
automatically eliminated where other f actors provide sufficient demonstration of their abilities. These factors, as listed in subsection 4.1 of ANSI /ANS.
3.1, shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and approved anc documented by the PORC Chairman.
6.5.3.5 Temporary procedure changes shell be reviewed and approved in accordance with Specification 6.8.3.
6.5.3.6 Eecords) documenting the activities performed under Specification 6.5.3.1 through _6.5.3.5 shall be maintained in accordance with Specification 6.10.
-252a-
~
Unit P8APS e
6.8.2 Each procedure and administrative policy of Technical Specification 6.8.1 and changes thereto, and any other procedure or procedure. change
+
that the Plant Manager deteroines to affect nuc1 car safety shall be re<iewed and approved in accardance with Technical Specification
.5.3 (and 6.5.1.6.a and 6.5.1.7.h, if required) prior to implementatic,.
Each procedure of Technical Specification 6.8.1 shall also be reviewed periodically as set forth in Administrative procedures.
4 6.8.3 Temporary changes to procedures of Technical Specification 6.8.1 above-l may be made, provided:
a.
The-intent of the original procedure is not altered.,
b.
The change is approved by two members of the plant management staf f, at least one of whom holds t Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.
c.
Within 14 days of implementation, the change is documented, reviewed by an SQR in accordance with Technical Specification 6.5.3.1, and approved by either the Plant Mcnager (or his designated alternate in eccordance with Technical Specification 6.1.1) or the Superintendent designated by Administrative procedures as the responsible Superintendent for that procedure.
6.8.4 (Relocated into 6.8.1.c) 6.9 Reportino Reo;.tice:aents In addition to the applicable reporting requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following identified reports shall be submitted to the HRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4, " Written Communications".
1 a
-254-e i
~. -
_ ~ --
Unit 3 PBAPS 6.5.1.6 Continued
.i.
Review of the Plant Security Plan, and shall submit reconnended changes to the Plan to the Plant Manager and the Nuclear Review Board.
J.
Review of tne Emergency Plan, 'and shall submit recommended changes to the Plan to the Plant Manager and the Nuclear Review Board.
k.
Review of every unplanned release reportable under 10CFR 50 /2 and 50.73, of radioactive material to the environs; evalur.e the event; specify remedial action to prevent recurrence; and document tie event description, evaluation, and corrective action and uc disposition of the cnrrective action in the plant records.
t Authority 4
{
6.5.1.7 The Plant Operations Review Committee shall:
a.
P,ecornand in writing, to the Plant Manager, for his approval or disapproval of items considered under 6.6.1.6(a) through (d) t f
above.
i b.
Render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered under 6.5.1.6(b) through (e) above l
constitutes an unreviewed safety question, as defined in 10 CFR 50.59.
c.
Provide immediate written notification to the Vice President.
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, or in his absence, the i
Senior Vice President - Nuclear and the Nuclear Review Board of j
disagreement between the PORC and one Plant Manager; however, the Plant Manager _ shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.
b
)
-248-i w
l 4
bnit 3 PBAPS c.
Audit reports encompassed by Section 6.5.2.8 above, shall be forwarded to the Senior Vice President-tiuclear, and to the m>nagement positions responsible fcr the l
trees eudited within 30 days af ter completion of the audit.
6.5.3 Procedure Review and Accroval 6.5.3.1 Each new procedure and procedure change shall be reviewed by a Station Qualified Reviewer (SQR) and then by a Superintendent designated as responsible for the procedure. Administr ative procedures (and changes thereto) shall be reviewed by PORC prior to approval by the Plant Mrnager or his designated alternate in accordance with Specification 6.1.1 The SQR shall not be the individual who prepared the new procedure or procedure change, he may however be from the same organization as the preparer. In addition to performing procedure revieas, the responsible Superintendents shall ensure that a suf ficient complement of SQR's for their functional area is maintained.
PORC shall have the option to review new procedures or prccedura changes without the prior review and a; proval of the SQR and responsible Superintendent. Procedures reviewed in this manner will be approved by tne Plant Manager.
6.5.3.2 Unless preempted by FORL as described in 6.5.3.1, the SQR shall review each new procedure or procedure change. The SQR shall render a determination in writing of whether or not a cross-disciplinary review of the new procedere or procedure change is necessary.
If such a review is determined to be necessary, it shall be performed by the appropriate personnel Upon completion of the SQR review, each new procedure or prccedure change shall be reviewed by the Superintendent designated by Administrative procedures as the responsible Superintendent for that procedure. The Superintendent shall, as part of his review, decide whether or not a 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluation is y
required.
If a Safety Evaluation is not required, the new procedure or procedure change shall be approved by the responsible Superintendent or the Plant Manager prior to implementation.
6.5.3.3 If the responsible Superintendent determines that a new procedure or procedure change requires a 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluation, the responsSie Superintendent shall render a dekrmination in writing of whether or nct the new procedure or procedure change involves an Unreviesed Safety Question (USQ). The responsible Superintendent shall then forward the new procedure or procedure change with the associated Safety Evaluation to PORC for review.
If an USQ is involved, prior NRC approval is required per 10 CFR 50.59 tefore implementation of the new procedure or procedure change.
6.5.-3.4 Personnel recommended to perform the function of SQR shall be approved and designated as such by the PORC Chairman. The SQR shall be an individual frce the responsible orgcnization and knowledgeable in the functional area affected. The individual snall meet the qualifications of AN51/ANS-3.1-15El, Selection. Qualification and Traininc of Personnel for Nuclear Pc ser Plants, Section 4, excluding subsections 4.3.2 and 4.5.
Individuals who do not possess the formal educational requirements specified shall not be autnatically eliminated where other f actors provide sufficient demonstration g
of their abilities. These factors, as listed in subsection 4.1 of ANSI /ANS-3.1, shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and approved and documented by the PORC Chairman.
6.5.3.5 Temporary procedure changes shell te reviewed and ap;rcved in accordance with Specification 6.E.3.
6.5.3.6 f.etords bocumenting the ac:ivities performed under Specification 6.5.3.1 through 6.5.3.5 shall be maintained in accordance witn Specification 6.10.
-252a-
t ra. a a
L.
PBAPS 6.8.2 Each procedure and administrative policy of Technical Specification-6.8.1 and changes thereto, and any other procedure or procedure = change that the Plant Manager detern.ines to affect nuclear safety shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with Technical Specification 6.5.3 (and 6.5.1.6.a and 6.5.1.7.a. if required) prior to implementation.
Each procedure of Technical Specification 6.8.1 shall also be reviewed g
periodically as set forth in Administrative procedures.
6.8.3 Temporary changes to procedures of Technical Specification 6.8.1 above l
(-
may be made, provided:
!~
The intent of the original procedure is not altered.
a.
b.
The change is approved by two members of the plant management staff, at least one of whom holds a Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.
m Within 14 days of implementation, the change is occumented, c.
reviewed by an SQR in accordance with Technical Specification 6.5.3.1, and approved by either the Plant Manager (ce his j
designated alternate in accordance with Technical Specification 6.1.1) or the Superintendent designated by Administrative
~
procedures as the responsible Superintendent for that procedure.
i'
- 6. 8. 4-(Relocated into 6.8.1.c)
~
h 6.9 Reportino'Recuirements t
In addition to the tpplicable reporting requirements of Title 10, Cooe j-of Federal Regulations, the following identified reports shall be a
4 submitted to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4, " Written
(.}
Communications".
4
?y
.J-3 ~.=
Y
-5
}a d.
h e
=
-254-E l.
l e
en,r m-+---v---e
,re, w
e, r
e r>-