ML20091N175
| ML20091N175 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1992 |
| From: | Shipman W GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9201300105 | |
| Download: ML20091N175 (8) | |
Text
.
(~u*O! Qi> I\\W/Of C.UYi{ ne<iy w n ame w n.:n
. Wy, r q
- r. o G y 7ia ' GP. 'f1 kiepnane 4 34 ?,'.i t'L; 4 04 ' 64 9 -c.1 g
n Nudear Plant Vgue bCOlplij lIOWC[
o January 23, 1992 Simulator Facility certification Annual Update Log:
IJOT-02359 Ref:
Docket lios. 50-424 & 50-425 U.
S.
Iluclear Regulatory Commission ATT!1:
Document Control Desk Washington, D.
C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Attached is a summary of the annual certification testing exceptions for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 1 &
2.
Though these changes are minor in nature and are not required to be submitted, we are doing so to keep you aware of the status of our program.
Sincerely,
'l'V)Y mW W.
B.
Slipman General Manager WBS/RJB/gww Attachment xc:
R.
E.
Dorman 110RMS C.
K.
McCoy g3a
.sc m ;
i il 9201300105 920121 PDR ADOCK 05000424 R
ppg
_.- - _- - --~ -. - - - -.-
s The Vogtle Simulator Cortification Updato has boon completed for 1991. The results aret The exceptions have not changed from the 1990 report.
There are still two modifications that havo not boon completed within the timo allowed by the standard. They are DR 8809012 "Protous" Computer system simulation is not current DR 8809011 The simulated MCR lighting is controlled by only two relays & no dimmer switches.
Both projects are currently in progress.
Lighting The lighting upgrade is requiring extensive rowjring of the lighting fixtures in the simulator. It is currently approximately 50% complete. Wo expect completion of the project by 4/1/92. At that time the DR will be closed.
The training impact is very insignificant because tho l
lighting does go to backup supplies when power is lost to lighting bussos.
The only impact is
- that, in the simulator, all main lighting is lost on loss of power from either of two lighting transformers. In the plant i
the lights are split betwoon power supplion some of which aro 1E.
l Proteus l
Georgia Power Co. currently has a contract with the "ABB" corporation to replace the "Protous" computer system. Wo expect the "Protous" replacement to be available for training by the end of 1993. At that timo the DR will be closed.
The current simulation of "Protous" is limited and l
differs in some aspects of operation from the olant system. However, this has very little impact on tr, aing because the plant has two other computer systems that have more information in a
mare user-friendly environment. Plant operators normally uso the " Emergency Response Facility Computor", which has over 1000 analog l
points or the " Plant Safety Monitoring Systom" computer.
These computers have most of the points that "Protous" has in a much better format. Wo.do-use tho actual plant i
system to train the operators on the features of the system.
L
...,,r.-.-...
-.n..
,,___.-.,_,..~.,.,,-,,n.
The ;ollowing minor changes were made to the testing program.
Some were mado duo to plant changes, some to improve the testing, i
and some due to inconsistoncios betwoon the test guidos and the abstracts.
1.
Malf unction test #05-05, "LOCA: Small Break," was modified as follows:
a.
Verification of containment spray actuation was removed i
sinco containment pressure will not increase above the HI-3 containment pressure actpoint given the small LOCA specified in the test.
b.
Some paramotors from the critical paramotors workshoot woro either removed or modified because they were either redundant or incorrect.
c.
The malfunction sovority, as specified in the test i
- abstract, was changed to agree with the severity specified in the test proceduro.
I The following documents were updated:
a.
PERFORMA!1CE TEST ABSTRACT: 05-05 (FORM 05-02) b.-
MALFUllCTIOlt TEST 11 UMBER: 05-05 (FORM 05-03) c.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-05 (FORM: 09-01) 2.
Halfunction test /05-09,
" Loss of Emergency Power,H was modiflod to clarify the procedure stops.
In doing so, 05-09 was broken up into to sub-procedures05-09A and 05-09B.
The following documents were alther updated or added because of thin-chango:
f a.
PERFORMA11CE TEST ABSTRACT: 05-09 (FORM 05-02) b.
MALFUllCTIOli TEST liUMBER: 05-09 (FORM 05-03) c.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-09A (FORM 09-01) d.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-09B (FORM: 09-01) l 3.
Malfunction test #05-13, " Loss of Instrument DC Busses," was modified as follows:
l a.
Additional verifications woro added to tests #05-13A, l
- 05-13B,
- 05-13C and #05-13D to make the tests more complete.-
b.
Verification of loss of individual 1AY1A loads was removed from - test #05-13A since the loss of 1AY1A is checked in test #05-12.
c.
Soveral paramotors that are ovaluated in #05-13C woro changed to better verify loss of the associated power supply.
The following documents were updated:
a.
MALFUNCTION lEST NUMBER: 05-13 (FORM 05-03) b.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-13A (FORMS 09-01) c.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-13B (FORMS 09-01) d.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-13C (FORM 09-01) e.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-13D (FORMS 09-01) 4.
Malfunction test #05-17 sons of Component Cooling," was modified as follows:
a.
Soveral additional verifications were added to tosts #05-17A and #05-17C to make the tests more completo.
- b. -
Test #05-17B was completely rewritten because a now CCW model has boon installed since the last time this test was performed.
The change in the leak location betwoon the old and the now CCW models necessitated the chango in the test proceduro.
Although the leak location has boon i
changed between the old and new CCW models there is no significant dif forence betwoon the overall CCW system responso and the actions the operator would tako in responho to the Icak.
The following documents woro updated a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 05-17 (FORM: 05-02) b.
MALFUNCTION TEST NUMBER: 05-17 (FORMS 05-03) c.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-17A (FORM 09-01) d.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST: 05-17B (FORMS 09-01) o.
CRITICAL PARAMETERS LIST 05-17C (FORM: 09-01) 5.
Malfunction test
- 05-21,
" Fuel Cladding Failure,"
was modified as follows:
a.
The order and severitics of the malfunctions, as specified in the test abstract, woro changed to agree with the order and severities of the malfunctions specified in the test procedure.
The following document was updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 05-21 (FORM 05-02) 6.
Malfunction test #05-25,
" Main Steam Lino Break outsido Containment," was modified as follows:
l
_. _... ~,,,. -. - - _.. - -
.m
a v
a.
IC condition was changed from 49% EOL, EqXu to 48% BOL, EqXe for both test /05-2BA_ and #05-258.
This change was necessary since thoto is no 49% EOL, EqXO IC currently being maintained as a controlled IC.
b.
The malfunction savority, as specified in the test abstract for test #05-25B, was changed to agree with the soverity specified in the test proceduro, c.
Because the IC's for this test woro changed irom EOL to BOL, a larger chango in Tavg la expected.
Thorofore the reference to small or slight changes in Tavy woro removed in the test proceduro and the paramotor qualification workshoot.
The following documents Woro updatedI a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ADSTRACT: 05-09 (FORMt 05-02) b.
MALFUNCTION TEST NUMBERt 05-25 (FORMt 05-03) c.
-CRITICAL PARAMETER LISTt 05-25A (FORMt 09-01) 7.
Malfunction test /05-29," Process Instrument Failuros," was mod!fied as follows a.
Expected PRZR level responso for test 05-29E was modiflod to be consistent with the test proceduro.
-b.
Verification of a reactor trip duo to low SG 1evel was rornoved in #05-290 because the malfunction severities and timing specified will not cause a SG low lovel condition.
The following documents woro updated a.
MALFUNCTIOff TEST NUMDER: 05-29 (FORM 05-03) b.
CRITICAL PARAMETER-LISTt 05-29E 8.
Normal Operations test #06-01, " Plant Startup to Not Standby,"
was modified as follows:-
a.
Gonoral proceduro steps woro removed sinco they are covered by the governing Unit Operating Procedures and to avoid making revisions to the cert test procedure overy time there is a major update to the Unit Operating Procedures.
b.
Initial conditions Woro changed to 140
- F to.be consistent with the Unit Operating Proceduro.
-The following documents were updatedt a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT C6-01 (FORM 06-02) b.
NORMAL OPERATIONS TESTt 06-01 (FORM 06-03) i
-)
4 9.
Normal Operations test #06-G5, "Cooldown to Cold Shutdown conditions," was modified as follows:
a.
General proceduto stops were removed since they are covered by the governing Unit operating Procedures and to avoid making revisions to the cort tent proceduro every timo there is a major updato to the Unit Operating Proceduros.
b.
Final conditions were changed to 140 *F to be consistent with the Unit operating Proceduro.
The following documents were updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 06-05 (FORM 06-02) b.
NORMAL OPERATIONS TEST: 06-05 (FORM 06-03) 10.
Normal Operations test #06-09, " Steady Stato Test at 30%," was modified as follows:
a.
Test run time was changed to 60 minutos to make the test abstract and the test proceduro consistent.
l The following documents woro updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 06-09 (FORM 06-02) b.
NORMAL OPERATIONS TEST: 06-09 (FORM 06-09) 11.
Normal Operations test #06-10, " Steady Stato Test at 75%," was modified as fol)ows:
a.
Test run time was changed to 60 minutes to make the teet abstract and the test proceduro consistent.
i The following documents woro updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 06-10 (FORM 06-02) b.
NORMAL OPERATIONS TEST: 06-10 (FORM 06-09) 12.
Transient test #07-01, " Manual Reactor Trip," was modified as follows:
a.
Verification of the Pressurizer Low Level Deviation Annunciator was removed.
Prosaurizer program lovel is scaled to accommodato the Pressurizer lovel shrink following a reactor trip.
Thorofore assuming r.o other malfunctions and with the pressurizer level control systems in auto, s pressurizer low level deviation condition should not occur.
__ _.m._ _ __ _ _ _.~__ _ _.____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I The following document Wan updated:
a.
TRANSIENT TEST: 07-01 (FORM 07-03) 13.
Transient test #07-02, " Simultaneous Trip of All Foodwater Pumps," was modified as follows:
a.
Vorification that the MFWP suction flow decreases was changed to verification that the MFWP dischargo flow decreases.
The following document was updated:
a.
TRANSIENT TE3T: 07-02 (FORM 07-03) 14.
Transient test #07-04,
" Simultaneous Trip of All Reactor Coolant Pumps," was modified as follows:
a.
Because of a plant modification which removed the RCP undervoltago trip and the RCP undorfrequency (with an undervoltage condition) trip, verification that the RCP breakers trip _ and the RCP amber trouble lainpa light was
- removed, b.-
The malfunctions, as specified in the test abstract, were changed to agroo with the malfunctions specified in the tout proceduro.
The following documents Woro updated:
a.
1>dRFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 07-04 (FORM 07-02) a.
TRANSIENT TEST: 07-04 (FORM 07-03) 15.
Transient Test #07-05, " Single Reactor Coolant Pump Trip," was modified as follows:
l a._
The total exerciso time, as specified in the test abstract, was changed to agroo with the test proceduro.
The following document was updated:
l a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 07-05 (FORM 07-02) 16.
Transient Test #07-07, " Max Rato Power Ramp," was modified as' follows:
a.
The transient test title was incorrect.
l i
I
.._ - - --. ~
. -. ~.
i b.
The tino at which the return to full power is started was enanged in the test abstract to agroo with the test proceduro, t
The following documents woro updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 07-07 (FORM 07-02) b.
TRANSIENT TEST: 07-07 (FORM 07-03) 17.
Transient Test /07-09, "Unisolablo Main Steam Line Rapturo Insido containment," was modified as follows:
a.
The IC, as speciflod in the tout abstract, was changed to agroo with the test procedure.
1 The rollowing document was updated:
a.
PERFORMANCE TEST ABSTRACT: 07-09 (FORM 07-09) 18.
Transient Test /07-10,
" Slow Primary Deprosaurization to Saturated Condition w/ Stuck Safety Valvo," was modified as
- follows:
a.
Tho verification that lotdown isolation occurs was removed.
Saturated conditions occur in the RCS prior to Pressurizer level decreasing below 17% at which time Pressurizer level begins to increase.
l j
The following document was updated:
a.
TRANSIENT TEST: 07-10 (FORM 07-10) i 19.
" Simulator Real Timo Report," Form 08-03 was modified as follows:
a.
Valve HV9002 was replaced with valvo liv 8923A in the valve stroke timing test bocause valve HV9002 did not meet the
-minimum 15 second stroke timo required.
20.
" Exceptions Workshoot" Fo m _00-01, pagos 11-12 woro changed to reflect the current statu.s of work on the two DR's that are beyond the-time allotted by the standard.
l l
i
-w
..,,,n,_w,--.._,4.
.,.,,-.m
.mm...,n
..-%+
,4r
,,-%w
,-<es w
.._g
-,w,<.
,,.,-..-mm.--_ww.rw-,-+--.--
.y,wy,,
-,.,y,-w---,.
~-r,----
-