ML20090M604
| ML20090M604 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello, Nine Mile Point, Oyster Creek, Vermont Yankee |
| Issue date: | 11/02/1973 |
| From: | Stuart I GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Moore V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9105070368 | |
| Download: ML20090M604 (5) | |
Text
.....
AEC..STRIEUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET. TERI AL (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL Not 8016
/
VILE:
FROM:
DATE OP DOC DATE REC'D LTR MEMO RPT OTHER General Electric Company San Jose, California 93tg4 I. F. Stuart 11-2-73 11-5-73 X
TO:
SENT LOCAL PDR X
Mr. Moore i signed CLASS UNCLASS PROP INFO INPUT NO CiS REC'D DOCKET NO:
50-219/220h271 XXX 1
V DESCRIPTION:
ENCLOSURES:
Ltr trans the following:
Figures 4-25, 4-31 4 4-39 for maximum average planar linear heat generation rate which replace similarly, numbered figures DIST PER Ed. Gray in NEDM 10735 Supplement 6, 7, & 8.
( 1 cy ea enci rec'd)
{"
h PLANT NAME:
Dn ht Remoie FOR ACTION /INFORMATION 11-8-73 AB ZIEMANN(L)
REGAN(E)
BUTLER (L)
SCHWENCER(L) y / 2 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W
CLARK (L)
STOLZ(L)
DICKER (E)
W/ Copies i!/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies GOLLER(L)
VASSALLO(L)
KNIGHION(E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies KNIEL(L) v SCHEMEL(L)
YOUNGBLOOD(E)
W/ Copies W/ 2 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies INTEPSAL DISTRIBUTION Q FILE ( M TECH REVIEW DDITON A/T IND LIC ASST BRAI'IMAN
/ C FDR (4)
HENDRIE GRIMES
/ C, ROOM P-506A SCHROEDER CAMMILL DIGGS (L)
SALTZMAN MUNTZING/ STAFF MACCARY KASTNER GEARIN (L)
B. HURT CASE KNICHT BALLARD GOULBOURNE (L)
PLANS GIAMBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER LEE (L)
MCDONALD BOYD SHA0 MAIGRET (L)
DUBE M00RE (L)(B'4R) p.STELLO ENVIRO SERVICE (L) y DEYOUNG(L)(IVR)
HOUSTON MULLER SIEPPARD (E)
INFO SKOVHOLT (L)
NOVAK DICKER SMITH (L)
C. MILES P. COLLINS ROSS KNIGHTON TEETS (L)
/ D. EISENHUT IPPOLITO YOUNCBLOOD WADE (E) 7 0.E. GRAY REG OPR TEDESCO REGAN WILLIAMS (E)
FILE & REGION (3)
LONG PROJECT LDR WILSON (L)
MORRIS LAINAS 9105070368 731102 STEELE BENAROYA HARLESS PDR ADOCK 05000263 VOLIFER P
PDR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION 1LM k I - LOCAL PDR y e. q!vnr. M1 Oswego NY, Minneepolis, Minn., Brattleboro, Vt.
1 - DTIE(ABER'iATHY)
(1)(2k10)-NATIONAL LAB'S 1-PDR-SAN /LA/Nh, 1 - NSIC(BUCRUiAN) 1-ASLBP(E/W Bldt;,Rm 529) 1-GERALD LELLOUCIE 1 - ASLB(YORE /SAYRE/
1-W. PENNINGTON, Rm E-201 GT BROOKHAVEN NAT. LA WOODARD/"H" ST.
1-CONSULTANT' S 1-AGMED(Ruth Guss:
4,46. CYS ACRS FON'43 SENT TO LIC ASST.
NEW! ARK / BLLME/ACBABI AN EM-B-12 7, GT.
R. DIGCS ON 11-6-73 1-GERALD ULRIKSON...ORNL 1-RD.. MULLER..F-30
DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,175 CURTNER AVENUE, SAN JOSE, CALIFOANIA 95114 BWR PROJECTS DEPARTMENT i
l Phone (408) 297 3000, TWX NO. 910 338 0116
}
@ 1 t
50-219 50-8 November 2, 1973
$ @RO g4 4
50-271 g
i Mr. Voss A. Mnore h
rI2'
{
g (.
C.
l Assistant Director for
'9 k h b;
l Boiling Water Reactors
$ @ [' ai k U 1
Directorate of Licensing
's Of fice of Regulation U.S. Atomic Energy Commission P
j l
Washington, D.C.
20545 1
Dear Mr. Moore:
GUBJECT:
FUEL DENSIFICATION i
Reference:
Telecon Victor Stello (AEC Staff) and Ivan Stuart (GE),
October 18 curves for Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Enclosed' are new yd figures replace the similarly numbered figures in Rate.
The enclose l
NEDM 10735 Supplement 6, 7, and 8 composite.
The enclosed' figures are mar.ed_(Rev 11-5) to differentiate them from those which are presently in k
NEDM 10735.
Curves 'i-9A2, 4-9B1-4, and 4-9C2 were also checked and it was
- determined that no e.anges to those curves are necessary.
j As requested in the referenced telecon, these curves have computer calcu-lated points for 25,000 MWD /T exposure.
It is hoped this information will assist your review of fuel densification effects in GE 3WR's.
If we can be of any further assistance, please call.
Sincerely.
I a/
Vh
]f,y '
- 1. F. Stuart, Manager cy I
/
'D Licensing Subsection Mail Code 682, Ext. 2791 b
pog,p-i IFS:bjs s
NOV5 $ 7 5
Enclosures p g tATORT i
EM%
e o.
l l
Sois DE SURE TO INCLUDE MAIL CODE ON RETURN CORRESPONDENCE
__.._-__1
.. ~
9 i
18 PLANT A CURVEc - MAxidVM ALLONADLC 10 $f AY UILOW CunntNT
{
TECelt46C AL Sf'icit lCATION LIMIT ON I'C AK LHGn CURVE A MAXIMUfA ALLOWAOLE WITil y
CONS [nVATIVE A!.5UMPTIONS CUnyt 9 - lAAXIMUM ALLOWACLL WITH OUTER UOUND A$$ UMP 1 TONS i
i 167 l
4 O;
15 e
1 Eo 5
K<
k d
14 5
i s
4 3o 3
a E
13 t
<1 l
^
0 7
12 7
i enmus esami, muss enge,,,,,,
e,,,
11
~
l
~
i a
APPROXIf.iATE CunnENT MifJifAUM [XPO;URE l
\\
\\
O 5,000 10.000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30.0 2 AVEn AGE PL AN A'1 EXPOCURE (mWdhi
+
Figure 4-9A1 Haxietun A11cunble Average Planer LilGR Applicable to Fuel Type l
Reload 1 (Rev.11-5) 4-25
w
. - - ~ _.
e I
PLANT C '
(
e.
e 1Bi MAXI *Aut.1 ALLOWARLE TO ST AY !!L LOW Cult l1FNT TlCitNICAL SPLCiricATION LitAti ON PC AK LilGR I
CURVEo -
l CURVE #. MAXtfAutA ALLOW AtiLE WITH CONSLnVATIVE ASSUMPTIONS CURVE y MAXfMUM ALLOWAULE WITil OUTER t10VND i
I 17 -
1 4
ASSUMPTIONS
?
/
i 0
16 -
i 1
15
- l g
d.
Eo 5
- 4 4
Z 2
1.
0 N
f
(
2 32 R
13
<2 l
12~
=
- = = ~ ~
==..
y
.,W A APPROXIMATE CURRENT MINIMUM EXPOSURE 11 -
l l
l l
30,0C.)
25.000 15.000 20,000 10,000 5,000 AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE tmWJ/s) 0 Maximum A11ovabic Average Planar tilGR Applicabic to Figure 4-9C1 Reload 1 (Generic B) (Rev.11-5) 4-31
t
,.. e PLAf4T b '
j MAXtt.iVfA AL LOWAHL E TO ST AY Bf I OW CulinLNT i
CUHVL o T E C4HJIC AL CPECf t lC ATION LIMIT ON l'E AK LHCR 1
4 CURVE p - MAXtMUfA ALLOWADLE WITH CON $t0V ATIVE ASSUMPTIONS j
g MAXIMUfA ALLOWADLE WITH OUTEn DOUND i
CURVE 1 ASSUMP1 TONS e'
1 0
l
=
f 16 1
1 a
l N
l
=
g 15 d',
Eo 5
E
~
4 z
~
5 e.
14 g
4 a
m i
>(
h y
E 13 g
E i
I l
12 t
J l
l 7
i 11 A
i p#
h l
APPROXIMATE CURRENT MINIMUM EXFOSURE j
l 10 0
5,000 10,000 15,000 20.000 25.000 30,0C3 l
AVE R AGE PL AN AR EXPOSURE (mWdit)
Figurc 4-9G Maxitnum Allowable Average Planar LilGR Applicable to Fuel Type Initial Coro (Rev, 11-5) f l
4-39
~...
- -.. -