ML20090K697
| ML20090K697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/1984 |
| From: | Barker H, Barnes L, Llewellyn D, Mckenzie E, Rogers W, Rudasill L, Shropshire J, Kimberly Webber, Joshua Wilson DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| A-112, NUDOCS 8405240344 | |
| Download: ML20090K697 (24) | |
Text
, //[
U -.~
Exhibit 112 I ')
8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA M I ?'y{c
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
\\;
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSIN [BOARITC23
. d MAR 20 es4>
'l In the Matter of
)
Doc cs
/
\\
carnc=::n=:xm/
)
DUKE POWER COMPANY, et al. )
Docket Nos(4,5Qi[
)
N 0; y, '. l(s (Catawba Nuclear Station,
)
N Units 1 and 2)
)
TESTIMONY OF W. E. ROGERS, L. R. BARNES, L. W. RUDASILL, E. G. MCKENZIE, K. R. WEBBER, J. C. SHROPSHIRE, H. R. BARKER, D. H. LLEWELLYN AND J. R. WILSON REGARDING IN CAMERA WITNESS #2's ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING FOREMAN OVERRIDE 1
Q.
PLEASE STATE YOUR
- NAMES, BUSINESS ADDRESSES AND 2
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS.
3 Mr. Rogers:
My name is W.
E.
(Bill) Rogers.
My business 4
address is Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S. C.
5 29710.
My current position is Welding Superintendent.
I am 6
responsible for Welding at Catawba.
My department consists of 7
approximately 550 employees.
Prior assignments have included 8
Welding General Foreman, Welding Foreman, Welding Inspector, and 9
Welder with Duke Power.
A copy of my professional qualifications 10 is attached (Attachment A).
11 12 A.
Mr. Barnes:
My name is L. R. Barnes.
My business address is 13 Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S.
C.
29710.
14 My current position is Planning and Control Manager for 15 Construction of the Catawba Nuclear Station.
A copy of my 16 professional qualifications is attached to Applicants' testimony 17 addressing the Board's Question Concerning the Containment Spray Q
18 System.
8405240344 840130 PDR ADOCK 05000413 g
v O.
1 Mr. Rudasill:
My name is Larry W. Rudasill. My business address 2
is Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S. C.
29710.
3 My current position is Welding Supervisor in Reactor Building #2.
4 In the past, I have held positions as a Welding Inspector and 5
Welder for Duke at Catawba and McGuire Nuclear Station.
A copy 6
of my professional qualifications is attached (Attachment B).
7 8
Mr. McKenzie:
My name is Ed G. McKenzie.
My business address 9
is Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S. C.
29710.
10 I am a Pipe Supervisor at Catawba in Reactor Building #2 and have i
11 been at Catawba for 6 years.
A copy of my professional 12 qualifications is attached (Attachment C).
13 14 Mr. Webber:
My name is Kenneth R.
Webber.
My business O
'l 15 address is Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223 Clover, S. C.
l 16 29710.
My current position is Pipe Superintendent.
I am 17 responsible for pipe erection at Catawba.
Past responsibilities i
18 include Pipe and Pipe Restraint Superintendent, Welding 3
19 Superintendent, Welding - General Foreman, Welding Foreman and 20 Welder.
A copy of my professional qualifications is attached 21
( Attachment D).
22 23 Mr. Shropshire:
My name is J.
C.
Shropshire.
My business 24 address is Catawba Nuclear station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S. C.
25 29710.
My current position is Quality Assurance Engineer.
I am 26 responsible for the Mechanical, Welding, and NDE Quality Assurance 27 Group.
A copy of my professional qualifications is attached to _-
r.-a v
1 Applicants' ' testimony addressing the Board's Question Concerning 2
the Containment Spray System.
3 Mr. Wilson:
My name is J.
R. Wilson.
My business address is 4
Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S.
C.
29710.
5 My current position is Welding General Foreman.
I am in charge of 6
all the welding activities in Reactor Building #2, UHI Building #2 7
and #2 Dog House.
A copy of my professional qualifications is 8
attached (Attachment E).
9 10 Mr. Barker:
My name is H. R. Barker.
My business address is 11 Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, S. C.
29710.
12 My current position is Welding Supervisor in Reactor Building #1.
13 In the past, I have held positions as a Welding Inspector and 14 Welder for Duke.
A copy of my professional qualifications is O
15 attached (Attachment F).
16 17 Mr. Llewellyn:
My name is D. H. Llewellyn. My business address 18 is Catawba Nuclear Station, P. O. Box 223, Clover, SC 29710.
19 My present position is group leader of Technical Support - Welding.
20 A copy of my professional qualifications is attached (Attachment G).
21 22 Q.
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH IN CAMERA WITNESS #2's ALLEGATION 23 THAT UNACCEPTABLE WELDS RESULTED FROM FOREMAN 24 PRESSURE FOR HIGH PRODUCTIVITY AS OPPOSED TO HIGH 25 QUALITY?
.Y 1
A.
Yes.
We have reviewed his testimony.
As support for his V
2 allegation, the witness raises the following major concerns:
3 1.
He alleges that his foreman told him to finish his welds so 4
that they looked more uniform, despite the fact that the 5
witness did not believe that this had anything to do with 6
the adequacy of the weld.
l 7
2.
He alleges that Buck Henry told him that Henry's foreman 8
pressured him to finish one weld using a certain weld rod 9
that was inappropriate.
The witness alleges that Henry 10 further stated that the weld was rejected, Henry's stencil i
11 was pulled because of this rejection, and he was unjustly 12 forced to recertify.
13 3.
The witness alleges that Malcolm Young stated to him that i
14 Young was forced by his foreman to weld one Class G 15 weld despite the fact that the fit-up was unacceptable, 16 and because of the poor fit-up,
the one weld was i
]
17 rejected.
He alleges that Young told him that his stencil 18 was pulled because of this one rejected weld and Young 19 was unjustly forced to recertify.
I 20 4.
The witness alleges that M. D. Ray attempted to cover up 21 defects in a weld because he was afraid of foreman 22 pressure.
l 23 5.
The witness alleges that his foreman,
L.
- Rudasill, 24 attempted to pressure him to tack weld fit-ups on 2 inch l
25 schedule 80 stainless steel pipe for Ed McKenzie's crew in 26 the Reactor Building (Unit 2) without proper paperwork
]
27 present.
,,L
e f
1 6.
The witness alleges that welding; foremen inappropriately
,O.
2 approved welds on construction hangers (which he states 1.
3 are at times safety-related) in order to increase l
4 production.
5 6
Q.
HAVE YOU INVESTIGATED THE ALLEGATION?
7 A.
Yes.
This investigation consisted of a review of relevant portions j
S of documents regarding this issue, as well as discussions with 9
- welders, welder
- foremen, general
- foremen, the welding 10 superintendent, the piping superintendent, and pipe fitters.
i 11 12 Q.
WHAT WAS THE RESULT OF YOUR INVESTIGATION 7 I
13 A.
From the investigation, we determined that the witness' specific 4
j 14 allegations were not accurate.
Further, we could find no instance 15 where foremen sacrificed the quality of work for quantity. On the
}
16 cmstrary, foremen are very concerned about quality.
In any event, i
i 17 nuclear safety related welds, including any which might have 4
18 resulted from the alleged poor welder practices, would have been 1
19 subjected to a number of required inspections and nondestructive i
20 examinations to identify and, if necessary, repair unacceptable i
l 21 defects.
Accordingly, this allegation does not call into question the 22 safe construction of the plant.
Factors which tended to support i
I 23 this determination include those noted bel w.
l 24 -
1.
When a welder is certified and renews his certification
.i r
l 25 stamp, that certification is subject to removal if the 26 quality of. his welds so warrants.
Quality Assurance Q
27 Procedure I-1 paragraph 4.7 states 'that renewal of.
e J
1 qualification of a welder is required when the Authorized
-O 2
Nuclear Inspector, Construction Technical Support 3
Welding, or the Project Quality Assurance Engineer raises 4
valid questions regarding the welder's ability to make 5
welds that meet the specifications.
In short, when the 6
quality of a welder's work is called into question his 7
stamp may be pulled and he may be required to recertify.
8 Therefore, as the witness has himself stated, there is a 9
great deal of pressure on each certified welder to perform 10 quality welds so that his certification will not be pulled.
11 WER, JCS, DHL, LRB.
12 13 2.
A welder's certification may be pulled by QA/QC action at 14 the recommendation of supervision such as his foreman.
15 Contrary to the witness' position, there are occasions 16 where foremen have taken welders from production work 17 and required them to undergo additional training to 18 improve the quality of the welder's work.
During these 19 training periods, however, quantity of production is 1
1 20 decreased.
Indeed two out of three examples noted by 21 the witness in his testimony illustrates instances where 22 the foremen have required additional training to improve 23 quality at the expense of quantity. WER, JCS.
24 25 3.
With regard to the witness' allegations concerning Mr.
26 Young, Mr. Young's foreman, when questioned, stated l
27 that the incident alleged by the witness did not occur as -
I the witness had described.
Indeed, in our conversation 2
with the welder, he stated that he was not pressured by 3
his foreman to get the job done at the sacrifice of 4
quality.
However, reports show that on approximately 5
9-30-80, Mr. Young was required to receive additional 6
training and be retested regarding a specific weld 7
procedure.
The retest was conducted in October,1981.
8 Mr. Young passed the test.
Significantly, the basis for 4
9 the retest was failure of two welds, not one as alleged by 10 the witness.
Further, Mr. Young's certification was not 11 pulled as alleged.
In addition, the unacceptable welds, 12 by the witness' own admission, were not safety-related.
13 1
In short, despite the fact that Mr. Young was, and still 14 is, a competent welder at the Catawba site, in this 15 instance the foreman sacrificed quantity to assure that 16 quality was maintained, even on a non-safety system. In 17 this case, foreman pressure was to assure quality. WER, 18 HRB, DHL.
19 20 4.
With regard to the witness' allegations concerning Mr.
21 Henry, Mr. Henry's foreman states that the incident as 22 alleged did not occur as described.
Indeed, in our 23 conversation with the welder, he stated that he was not 24 pressured by his foreman to get the job done at the 25 sacrifice of quality.
An Employee Report dated 7-14-83 26 documents a reprimand given to Mr.
Henry by his O
27 U
supervisor Larry Rudas111 because of poor workmanship on
..c I
four welds on rupture restraints in the Unit I reactor 2
building.
General Foreman J. R. Wilson's memo to file i,
-3 dated 7-14-83 states that the poor workmanship was 4
discovered by welding supervision before Quality 5
Assurance became involved.
The Employee Report states 6
that Henry would be required to recertify on the welding 7
process by taking the L-154 test.
Welder Performance 8
Qualification Form I-1B records state that Mr. Henry 9
performed the test on 7/18 7/22/83.
However, he i'
10 failed the test due to a rejectable defect discovered
]
11 by radiography.
He retested from 8/2 - 8/5/83 and was l
12 recertified on 8-23-83.
Significantly, the basis for 13 pulling Mr. Henry's certification was his unacceptable 14 work on four partially completed welds, not one as alleged 15 by the witness.
In addition, welding craft management 4
l 16 (not QA) was responsible for identifying the need to i
j 17 retest to assure the welder's ability.
In short, despite t
j-18 the fact that Mr. Henry was, and still is, a certified 1
j 19 welder, craft supervision sacrificed quantity to assure 20 the quality of Mr. Henry's welds.
DHL, WER, LWR, 21 JRW.
}
22 4
)
23 5.
With regard to the witness' allegations concerning Mr.
l 24 Ray, the witness himself states that the foreman was 25 applying pressure to assure quality of the welds.
26 Indeed, in our conversation with the welder, he stated h
27 that he was not pressured by his foreman to get the job i i
4 I
done at the sacrifice of quality.
This is consistent with
. O 2
General Foreman J.
R.
Wilson's memo to file dated l
3 11-17-82 which states that he told M. D. Ray that the 4
quality of his work was unacceptable and that he would 5
be sent to the test shop for one day to evaluate his 6
ability.
M. D. Ray's performance was determined to be 7
acceptable and no formal recertification test was given.
8 This example again supports the position that foremen will 9
not sacrifice quality for quantity.
JRW, WER, DHL.
10 J
11 6.
With regard to the witness' allegations concerning 12 pressure by Mr. Rudasill to perform tack weld fit-ups on 13 pipe for Mr. McKenzie's crew without the paperwork, no 14 records could be located involving this incident, nor did 4
1 15 anyone involved have any recollection regarding any 16 direction to tack fit-ups without paperwork. However, it 17 should be noted that the only work in the Reactor 18 Building involving Mr. McKenzie's crew working with 2 i
19 inch schedule 80 stainless steel pipe where holdpoints for 4
20 QA signatures on fit-ups were not present (and thus the 21 only possible situation the witness could be referring to) 22 was prefabrication of a temporary bypass around the j
23 blowdown heat exchanger.
This temporary bypass was 24 required to flush the system without running water 25 through the heat exchanger.
After the flush, the 26 temporary bypass was discarded.
Prefabrication work on Q
27 the temporary bypass did not require any paperwork.
It,
I
i L
I should be noted that such situations were not uncommon
/D 2
in the plant. KRW, WER, EGM, JCS.
i 4
in addition, since much of the pipe in the plant is not i
5 nuclear safety related and requires no paperwork prior to 6
fitting and welding, a similar type of situation could have l
7 occurred in other areas of the plant.
It should be noted I
8 that as a practical matter it would be totally impractical if f
l 9
not virtually impossible for fit-ups on safety related 10 systems to proceed without appropriate paperwork.
To 11 explain, before we being to withdraw piping material from 12 storage to begin a project, piping craft a.ust have the i
13 required paperwork which includes the bill of material for 14 O
the work, the isometric drawings, and QA sign-off forms.
15 The issue clerks need the bill of materials before they l
16 will issue materials for the work so that they can sign off I
t 17 that the material has been issued. Further, a cleanliness 13 inspection and sign-off is required prior to fit-up, and 19 QA inspections personnel can not sign-off the cleanliness 20 inspection without the paperwork.
Indeed, the sign off 21 sheet M-4A which the QA inspector signs to signify he -
l 22 +
has completed the cleanliness inspection is part of the 23 paperwork package.
In short, It is virtually impossible 24 to begin work on safety-related systems (which requires 25 QA attention) without the paperwork package.
- KRW, 26 EGM, JCS, DHL.
a lO L
l 10-l 3-
i 1
7.
. With regard to the witness' allegations concerning foreman 2
approval of inadequate welds on construction hangers, it 3
should be noted that in no case are construction hangers 4
used in nuclear safety related applications at Catawba.
5 Thus, the welds described by in Camera Witness #2 are 6
not significant with respect to nuclear safety. Moreover, 7
for such non-safety-related welds, the welding foreman is 8
the individual who approves such welds.
In short, this 9
allegation raises no safety-related concerns.
KRW, JCS.
O O
_.m ___ _ -... _,. _ _
i
. RESUME a -..
i WILLIAM E R0GERS 1
ATTACHENT A i
[
PERSONAL:
Home Address:
161 Weatherwood Street Rock HI11, S C 29730 i
Telephone:
(803) 366-6877 (Home) i (803) 831-1512 (office)
~
FORMAL EDUCATION:
Keowee High School - 1958 ADDITIONAL j.
- TRAINING:
Leadership School - U S Navy
[
Supervisory Development - Duke Power i
Management Development - Duke Power Management Graduate Development - Duke Power l
Effective Management by Harbridge House i-Effective Writing Seminar - Duke Power i
Appraising Performance - Duke Power PROFES$10NAL j
INVOLVEMENT:
Member - AWS i
Member - Advisory Ber J for:
Spartanburg Tech College Tri County Tech College York Tech College Owoax t
1 EXPERIENCE:
I FROM 10, TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY 0
I 12-78 Present Welding Supe.Intendent Catawba' Nuclear Duke' Power Station Manage Welding craft to accomplish quality welding In accordance with ASME welding l
codes.
Duties include hiring, training, and testing of welders to ASME,Section IV.
j Managing human resources to produce skilled craftsmen, supervisors,~and managers.
Through training, development and advancement set.up an effective Welding organization.
l Also, responsible for all pre he'at and spot weld heat treating.
Responsible for i
purchasing aid scheduling of all equipment to accomplish all of the above. Manage 7 general foremen directly, 45 foreman and 500 craftsmen Indirectly.
8-77 12-78.
Welding General Foreman Catawba Nuclear Duke Power 3
Station j
I
+
Manage construction craf t welders in Unit 1 Auxillary Building and pipe fabricat!on shop to do quality welding to ASME, Section lit, AWS codes and all QA and Design-4 l
criteria. Duties included training and advincing craf tsmen and supervisors to i
poststfons capable of meeting all construction schedules, and upgrade Duke Power's i
automatic welding program.
Supervised 7 foremen directly.and 100 craftsmen Indirectly.
I i
-O 4
_sm...4....,
y,
,_.__,.____y..._.my_.-
..my__
,,,,,,,.,,__,,[,,,__
, RESUME William E Rogers' Page 2 WORK EXPERIENCE:
(continued)
FROM TC[
TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY 8-70 8-77' Welding Foreman McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Power Oconee Nuclear Station I
Supervised welding crews and stress relieving crew in all phases of nuclear power plant construction, such as containment plate, nuclear power piping, mainstream, j
and feedwater piping. Supervised stress relieving crew on coolant loop piping on Unit 2 Oconee Nuclear Station.
4 1-69 8-70 Welding Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Power 4
Work in all phases of welding Inspection, visual, MT, PT, RT 8-61 1-69 Welder / Fitter Duke Power 1
Daniel Const. Co.
Davis Mechanical Westinghouse i
1 8-58 8-61 SR/SRP 2/c U S Navy O
4 t
i i
G D
a
i RESUME ATTACilMENT B LARRY RUDASILL PERSONAL:
Home Address:
4155 Koala Circle Tega Cay, S C 29715 Telephone:
(803) 548-0527 (Home)
(803) 813-1512 (office)
FORMAL EDUCATION:
South Mecklenburg High School - 1965 Central Piedmont Community College - Welding, Shop Math, Shop Science, Blueprint Reading, Shop Manage-ment, Business Administration, Computer Science, and Mechanical Courses Related to Motorcycle Repair and Small Engine Service.
ADDITIONAL Effective Listening - Duke Power TRAINING:
Management Principles'- Duke Power i
Supervisory Development - Duke Power Alcohol & Drug Abuse - Duke Power Effective Supervisory Communications - Duke Power Appraising Performance - Duke Power Supervisor as a Classroom Instructor - Duke Power
+
OSHA Training - Duke Power Level 1 PT Training Course - Duke Power Q,C Welding Inspection Program - Duke Power Planning Workshop - Duke Power EXPERIENCE:
TO, TITLE PROGRAM COM1ANY O
FROM 8-1-73 Present Walde'r Foreman Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Power Supervise 10-14 w=1ders in Reactor #2 on carbon and stainless pipe requiring some x-ray, MT, PT, & UT.
Ice Condenser fabrication, electrical and mechanical hot and cold penetrations (heavy wall z-ray welding).
Supervised in the Auxiliary Building on ASME stainless & carbon steel piping work requiring x-ray, UT, MT, &
PT examinations and permanent hangers - Construction, alternate and rigorous and electrical cable tray supports in Auxillary 3ullding and Reactor.
June & July 1982, served on Duke quality Awareness Committee. One and one-half years as a Welding a
Instructor for Duke Power Company teaching L-200 and L-300 process.
1-29-76 8-1-78 Welding Inspector Catawba Nuclear' Station Duke Power Completed Welding inspector training on 2-25-76.
Performed duties as Welding Inspector in all areas of Catawba Nuclear Station. Completed training and was certlfled Level 1 PT NDE Inspector on 5-17-76.
12-29-75 1-29-76 Walder Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Power Very little work performed on permanent plant during this one month duration.
s
RESUME Larry Rudasill Page 2 V
WORK EXPERIENCE:
(Cont'd)
FROM T0, TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY 8-6-73 12-29-75 Welder McCulre Nuclear Station Duke Power While at McGuire, I welded numerous x-ray welds in Turbine and Generator Cooling Tubes, numerous 100% x-ray heavy wall x-ray hot welds, penetrations in Reactor Building #1 requiring x-ray.
While at McGuire, I was certified in L-300 process using E-7018,E-6010. E-308-16, with E-308-16 and E309-16 being in the limited position. Was also certified in the L-200 Process using E-705-2 open butt and consumable Inserts, ER308 and ER309 open butt and consumable Inserts and aluminum certifications.
1968 1973 Welder / Fabricator Various Reeves Sheet Metal Co.
While working at Reeves, I worked on numerous tanks, pipe, duct, smoke stacks, and hydraulle cycilnders using E7018, E6010. ER308. ER309 E308-16 E309-16, and mig gun on a wide vaeiety of fabrication and welding.
While with Reeves, I worked 4
at Duke Power Company's Marshall Steam Station for nine months welding aluminum and stainless steel.
I worked at Duke Power Company's River Bend Station on
/~\\]
the gas turbine units using E-7018 on plate and tanks.
I worked at Duke Power Company's Allen Steam Station for six months, and Duke Power Company's Buck Steam Station for nine months and American Cyanamld Co. for nine months welding cluminum.
1967 1968 Welder VarloJs Lockhardt Manufacturing Co.
Stick welding on UL approved stainless and carbon steel doors and door frames.
(
.t
o RESUME ATTAQlENT C NAME:
Ed McKenzle, Powerhouse Mechanic Supervisor WORK LOCATION:
Catawba Nuclear Station ADDRESS:
Route 3, Box 129-A York, South Carolina 29745 EDUCATION:
Lockhart Elementary School Lockhart High School GEO Received in United States Army York County Technical College - Hechanical Engineering - Old not graduate FROM TO i
W0kK EXPERIENCE:
Duke Power Company 9-21-77 Present Powerhouse Mechanic 9-21-77 10-78 Powerhouse Mechanic Supv 10-78 Present Powerhouse Mechanic Supervisurs' Responsibilities (At Catawba)
I) Responsible for coordinating and leading the work activltles for a group of Powerhoi:so Mechanic Learners, Helpers, and Mechanics daily.
- 2) Responsible for erecting approximately thirty safety and O
non-safety related systems in the RBS (Basement) of
\\v' Reactors Number One and Two.
3)
Responsible for Process Control, and Material allocation needed for meeting erection requirements.
- 4) Responsible for ensuring that the work erected under my supervision is per design requirements, safety requirements, and quality control requirements.
FROM TO i
Daniels Construction Company 1975 1977 Powerhouse Mechanic Supervisor 1975 (3 months)
Powerhouse Mechanic Gen. Foreman 1975 1977 Powerhouse Mechanic General Foreman's Responsibilities (Daniels)
- 1) While assigned to the V C Summer Nuclear Station In Columbia, South Carolina, I was responsible for the welding program in the Reactor Dullding and the Turbine Building.
- 2) Was loaned to another Daniels Construction Project for approximately twelve weeks.
I supervised the replacenent of damaged boller tubes at the Bowaters Construction site in Catawba, South Carolina.
3)
Served as one of the Weld 8ng Technical Advisors for the V C Summer Nuclear Project.
Page 2 Ed McKenzio Resume
['Nb WORK EXPERIENCE: (Cont)
FROM TO Yeargen Construction Company T97T 1375 Welder 1974 (3 months)
Quality Constrol Supervisor 1974 1975 (Amaco Project, Char'eston, $C) l Daniels Construction Company 1972 1974 Pipefitter and Welder AME Construction Company 1971 1972 Pipefitter and Welder United States Army 1969 1971 While in the Army I had formal Welder training (Tig Hig, Stick, Aluminum, and Oxygen and Acetylene).
Florida Steel and Er6ction 1969 (8 rnonths)
Helper in Pipe Fabrication $ hop O
V Myers and Chapman Construction 1967 1969 Steel Erector and welder l
l lNTERESTS AND l
ACTIVITIES:
Church, Nasonlc Lodge #32, $hrine Club, Hunting, and Reading.
PERSONAL:
Narried, two children.
l
RESUME KENNETH R WEBBER ATTA0lMENT D r
~, 'ERSONAL:
Home Address
- 1 Easy Street Belmont..N C 28012 Telephone:
(704) 825-5667 (Home)
(803) 831-1512 ext. 512 (office)
FORMAL EDUCATION:
Anderson Boy's High - 1955 ADDITIONAt.
TRAINING:
Advanced Management Training - Duke Power Effective Management Program by Harbridge House PROFE5510NAL INVOLVEMENT:
Member - AWS Member - Advisory Board fort Tri-County Tech College Spartanburg Tech College York Tech College Rowan County Tech College WORK EXPERIENCE:
FROM 3
TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY
(") 6-82 Present Powerhouse Me.chanic Catawba Nuclear Duke Power Superintendent - Pipe Station v
Manage the construction craft to plan, schedule, and erect all piping systems in accordance with ASME lil, to support plant start-up of Unit 1 with administrative responsibilities to Unit 2.
Duties include allocation of resources, adninistration of human resources, and management through commodity production curves, cost per-formance reports, and quality and trend analysis reports.
Manage 6 first line managers and 500 craft and supervisors.
1-78 6-82 Powerhouse Mechanic Catawba Nuclear Duke Power Superintendent Station Pipe t, Support / Restraints Dutles were same as 6 81 to present with the added responsibilities of support /
restraints.
Duties also included creating a seperate division of craft to erect supports, hiring and training of 300 employees to erect supports to ASME Section Ill. Managed 9 direct and 1000 Indirect.
6-75 1-78 Welding Superintendent Catawba Nuclear Duke Power Station Managed welding craft to accomplish quality welds in accordance with ASME 5ection lli and AWS welding codes.
Set up training program and test welders to ASME 5ection IX Modernize Duke's welding program through research and development of automatic p ' pro. cesses and applications.
Sucessfully built, cuallfled, and welded all containment buildirg welds automatically and showed great cost savings. Other duties included administratf or of human re-sources, allocation of resources, and cost performance. Managed 3 direct and 350 Indirect.
4 RtsbME Kenneth R Webber Page 2 j
l WORK
' EXPERIENCE:
(continued)
FROM TO TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY l
1-74 1-75 Welding General Foreman McGuire Nuclear Duke Power Station l
Manage construction craft welders In the Unit 1 Reactor Sullding.
Duties were to accomplish quellty welds 'hlgh production through safe work practices, and well tralned personnel. Managed 6 direct and 90 Indirect 8-70 1-74 Welding General Foreman Oconee Nuclear Duke Power Station i
Manage construction craft welders in Units 1,2, & 3 Reactor Sulldings.
Duties were to manage workforce to accomplish high quality work, high production through safe work practices, and well trained personnel. Managed 9 direct and 150 Indirect.
L 9-69 8-70 Welding Foreman Oconee Nuclear Duke Power
[
Station Supervised welding crew in Turbine Buildings 1,2,'s 3 Duties were welding pipe and structural components.
O i-58
$-'s w id r/rlei r e 6. ro r Daniel Const. Co.
Grinnel Co.
Bahnson Co.
l O
l
RESUME ATTAOIENT E p-)
J R WILSON
(_/
PERSONAL:
Home Address:
2226 Hands Mill Rd.
York. 5 c 29745 Telephone (803) 366-766)
(Home)
(80)) 831-1512 (Work)
FORMAL EDUCATION:
Oreer High School - 1960 Welding Course (Ewtectic) - 1960 ADDITIONAL TRAINING:
Management Principles - Duke eower Supervisory Development - Duke Power Effective Listening - Duke Power Alcoho' & Drug Abuse - Duke Power Effective Supervisory Communications - Duke Power Appraising Performance - Duke Power Supervisor as a Classroom Instructor - Duke Power 05HA Training - Duke Power Pfarning Workshop - Duke Power Hanaging Stress Duke Power WORK EXPERIENCE:
u FR0H T,0, TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY 0
l 1971 Present Welder General Foreman Catawba Nuclear &
Duke Power McGuire Nuclear Plan and manage all present welding activities for 10 supervisors (120 welders) for Reactor Building A2, Interior & Exterior Dog Houses, and Upper Head injection Bulld-Ing #2. Work consists of all piping systems, all miscellaneous steel, and all structural steel. Worked 3 years as Walder General Foreman at Oconee Nuclear Station and 7 years at McGuire Nuclear Station in this position.
l 1969 1971 Welder Foreman Oconee Nuclear Duke Power Supervised 10 15 welders in welding piping systems, containment plate, structural steel, and miscellaneous steel in Reactor Buildings, Unit I and 2.
1968 1969 Senior Walder Oconee Nuclear Duke Power Supervised 10 15 welders in the absence of foreman at Oconee Nuclear on piping systems, contalement plate, miscellaneous steel, and structural steel in Units 1 & 2.
1967 1968 Welder Oconee Nuclear Duke Power l
Welded containment plate, condensor cooling water system, structural steel, miscella=
q neous steel, and general piping systems at Oconee Plant.
NJ
v RESUME J R Wilson Page 2
(~b l
\\_/
l WORK l
EXPERitNCE:
(Cont'd)
FROM TO TITLE PROGRAM CONDANY 1963 1967 Welder & pipefitter Various Daniel Const. Co.
Wolded and fit piping systems in various piants in several states.
South Carolina. Georgia. & Tennessee).
l 1962 1963 Welder & pipefitter Lyman Printing M Lowenstein & Sons i
& Finishing Co.
1961 1962 Walder & mechanic Southern Worsted Mill i
O l
l l
1 l
,O Y_ '
.i REIDE ATTAOlMENT F HARRY BARKER q
N..)
PERSONAL:
Home Address:
Rt. I, Box 318 Rock Hill, S C 29730 Telephone (803) 328-0785 (Home)
(803) 831-1512 (Work)
FORMAL EDUCATION:
Landis High School = 10th Grade CED - U S Army Evans Business College - 1 year - General Business ADDITIONAL
, TRAINING:
Supervisor Development - Duke Power Ef fective Comunications - Duke Power Alcohol & Drug Abuse - Duke Power 05HA Hazard Recognitlon - Duke Power Effective Writing - Duke Power Strategies for Effective 1,lstening - Duke Power Fair Employment Practices - Duke Power Behavior Reliability - Duke Power QA Welding Inspection Program - Duke Power SLpervisor as a Classroom Instructor - Duke Power Appraising Performance - Duke Power WORK EXPERitNCE:
FROM 3
TITLE PROGRAM COMPANY 7-I 77 Present Walder Foreman Catawba Nuclear Duke Power Supervise and direct 9 welders to ensure quality and production is maintained.
Coordinate and assign manpower to approorlate areas according to their require-ments.
Ensure equipment is maintained in safe and good working condition, esta-bilth work priorities according to schedules, promote safety and quality through-out the Welding Craft, evaluate subordinates regularly, provide accurate and timely feedback to supervisor as to manoower needs and status and progression of assignments.
7177 11 17 75 Welding Inspector Catawba Nuclear Duke Power Welding inneectori inspacted all welds to A$ME, Sec. IX, ASHC, Sec. J. AN11 8 31.1 and AWS 01.1.
11 17 75 9 24 7)
Welder McCulre Nuclear Duke Power Welder in Pesetor Bullding #2 1 17 7) 5 $4 Welding & Fitting Cannon Hills Kannapolls, NC p
l $4 1 51 0 $ Army Airborne s.
1 50 1 51 Piperitter Grinnell Co.
Charlotto. NC e
1 4
4
DAVID HUGH LLEWELLYN ATTAOlhENT G (s
PERSONAL:
Business Address:
P. O. Box 223 Clover, SC 29710 Telephone:
(803) 831-1512 Ext. 369 (Office)
FORMAL EDUCATION:
Duke University:
BSCE 1977 Winthrop College:
Graduate work in MBA 1980 - Present ADDITIONAL TRAINING:
Advanced Welding Metallurgy - U. of Wisconsin Extension Engineer / Professional Training - Duke Power Company Management Development - Duke Power Company PROFESSIONAL INVOLVEMENT:
Registered Professional Engineer - N.C.
- 10,368 Member - AWS; Chairman, Charlotte Section WORK EXPERIENCE:
~
CONSTRUCTION FROM TO TITLE SITE
-COMPANY s
6/77 Present Associate Field Engineer /
Catawba Duke Power Welding Group Leader Progressed from an entry level engineering position to Welding Technical Group Leader.
Overall responsibility for technical support relating to welding.
The group acts as an-interface between Design / Craft /QA/QC assuring that site welding is performed in accordance with the applicable codes and Duke Power QA Program.
I possess a thorough knowledge of ASME B & PV (Sec. II, III, VIII, IX, and XI), ANSI B31.1, and AWS Dl.1 Codes.
Manage the group's resolution to welding related problems encountered during construction.
These include problems encountered with piping, structural steel, plate, and pipe hanger welding within the Reactor, Auxiliary, and Turbine Buildings.
Also responsible for the origination of welding process control to assure inspections and pertinent information are documented.
r i
a.
David Hugh Llewellyn Page 2
, Originate Construction Procedures to simplify and detail Design requirements.
Responsible for qualification of procedures and welders under ASME,Section IX requirements.
Act as the welding contact for audits conducted by USNRC, INPO, ASME, Duke QA, etc.;
with responsibility for resolving and responding to their findings.
Possess experience in developing reinspection programs using statistical sampling methods to evaluate adverse conditions.
Have 2
years of supervisory experience and currently supervise 13 technical personnel.
/'s
%)
l l
/h N,)
a Tb e
',~
.?
a 4
t k
e
//
i S// //
\\
- f4' /,/ /
/
, ' f }' / /
.. '.4 /
//
l O
f a n / / c ~ <.,.,/ n /
- g Cf,1-f ~y/
f
- f t/
, c'/ / /,/,
,/
"7 / /./ /,/ ; ; /
/
/,.
/
p'
/
g/
5 ! f / j'.'/ '/
9 4' s/. '/
/
y s
q 3'
p,/, /
v
/ (\\ y
.i,
4e y;?
- ,o.
?,-
6; n
')
3 sj '
s I
i 9
.