ML20090D696
| ML20090D696 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 06/15/1984 |
| From: | Morgan R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20090D683 | List: |
| References | |
| RSEP-84-422, NUDOCS 8407190140 | |
| Download: ML20090D696 (2) | |
Text
--
)
l CP&L Carolina Power & Light Compan4'4 JUM2l A 8
- 3 7 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT I
POST OFFICE BOX 790 HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 June 15, 1984 Robinson File No:
13510E Serial: RSEP/84-422 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30323 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET No. 50-261 LICENSE NO. DPR-23 IE INSPECTION REPORT IER-84-09
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) provides this supplemental response to an item in the subject inspection report as requested by the NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Mr. Steven P. Weise.
Violation 2 of the subject report identified that a commitment to enter information into an Operations Experience Feedback (OEF) Program was not met.
CP&L responded to this violation on May 25, 1984. However, in the body of the inspection report, the NRC inspector expressed an additional concern that a Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Report 84-55, issued March 30, 1984, did not identify that this commitment was not met.
CP&L did not respond to this additional concern in its response to the subject violation because a response was not requested in the Notice of Violation (Enclosure 1) nor in the inspection report cover letter. The following is a response to this additional concern as requested by the NRC Senior Resident Inspector.
From The NRC Inspection Report Additionally, Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Report 84-55, issued March 30, 1984, documented a review of IE Report responses for verification that commitments were met.
For this particular item, the QA inspector did not verify that the event was being tracked under the OEF program.
hf0 0 1
r-u-
a e
. LGttsr.to Mr. James P. O'Railly Stric1: RSEP/84-422 Page 2
RESPONSE
Reason During the QA surveillance of the 1983 fourth quarter Facility Automated Commitment Tracking System (FACTS), the QA/QC Specialist identified that the_ response to the violation stated that the On-site Nuclear Safety Section had been notified to enter an item into the OEF program.
However, he failed to verify that this notification resulted in the item being published in an OEF bulletin.
Corrective Action This item has been discussed with the QA/QC Specialist involved and with QA/QC Surveillance personnel emphasizing the importance of in-depth verification of source documents that form the basis for closing or resolving identified items. No further action is planned.
If you have any questions concerning this supplemental response, please 1
contact me or my staff.
Very truly yours,
^ ^ ^ ^
R. E. Mot an General Manager H. B. Robinson SEG Plant CLW/pam i
~
E