ML20090B984

Performance Indicators Rept,Jan 1992

ML20090B984
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	01/31/1992
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20090B977	List: ML20090B974 ML20090B984
References
NUDOCS 9203040183
Download: ML20090B984 (106)

Text

_ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _____

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS J ANUARY 1992 2 s

e s w -

M ]I! ?i } !y gi r f Ih

[

i

,1

'!1 i_ T-- -

2-G. IllEJ,N E

- m. 13t@*A* \"A

~- - . , ,,,-

s'

</ f _

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group

8R 2868i! 38888aes R .PDR

%swl of wx&na w wn, abb,...

d Onvok wis6m wnd sowndjud ganud...

d w a, q%, canwu %g,comuukad...

d w a, way, of qb,...d w do&ng, Ljet 9kl L jusi %, weuj, %. at w Onawv-duu&d, nel L wdl of wievnal puuwa, a w owv ow,n,4 wedb wh ws wa wnd L pik wnd salu/wk LL corns l win, 2nbng, L 9kl kd of pean,, djust on, da&ng, L aghl %p.

Jaans ). 6'%neu

l l

l l

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT l FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group JANUARY 1992

}

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The " Performance Indmators Program"is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perior-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some periormance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for companson or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guid alines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) - Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in -

future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test ano Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this repN be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data"

- NUMARO 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D,"EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

.O

Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGE IN9JSTRY M OffQ m Gpf.1 TH'S LONTH LAST LONTH IEffQ UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL. .. .17 . o .. ,0 .. .0. f .. .3 SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE:

HOH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTON SYSTEM., . 0 008. . 0 008 - .. o 005 .. .NA- .NA. .6 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM . ..o014. . 0 01 .00005. . NA . . NA . .7 EMERGENCY AC POWER S(STEM . . 0.017. .0 24 . .0. .NA. . N A .. .8 THERMAL PERFORMANCE . .99% 99 3 % 99 2% . .. N A . . . N A .. .10 UNIT Ct'PABILITY FACTOR . . . 73 3% . . 69 2 - . 100% .. . 100 % . l .. .12 UNPLANNC.D CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR , . 8 9% . . .45%. .0%. . NA , .. N A .. ~13 FUEL REllA0lLITY INDICATOR.-..._ 16. . 0 75. . 3 03. . 3 66 . ~ NMA.. .14 COLLECTIVE RADIATON EXPOSURE tcuusmia .-.277/YR. . 250/YR . . 3 97. .. N A .. ..NA.. .15 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE teut.c n)..-...._... . 4.060/YR .. . 3.000/YR . .0. . N A .. . . N A .. .16 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.. .. o 72 .. 0.3 , .0. , 0.37 .. . l .. 17 CHEMISTRY INDEX/ SECONDARY 1 SYSTEM CHEMISTRY . , , . 0.34 . . 0 45 .. . 0 464.. ~ 0 463 . . . N MA . . 44 l OPERATlONS EAGE PDJSTAY OPPD Qff,Q ME DlAN M TH!S LONTH LAST LONTH IBgfQ STATON NETGENERATON (10,000 Mwh). .. N A .. .. NA .. . 30 7. . 36 2.. . N A .. .1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE . .. N A . . 4 5% .. .7IL . 9.28% . .. NMA . .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRIT: CAL , .1,7 . ., 0 .0.. .0. . l .. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS . (INPO DEFINITION).. .0 .0. .0.. _0. .. l . . .4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS - (NRC DEFINITON).. .0. .0. .0.. -0. . . l .. .5 l- GROSS HEAT RATE ..-... , . NA . . N A .. . 10,117.. . 10.023.. . . l .. .9 '

I l EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR , .. N A .. N A .. . 83L .100% .. .. D . .11 L UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR . . 73 3% - . 69 2% . .,100% .100% . , l ., .12 I

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR , .89%. . 4.5% . . 0% .. .. N A .. .- N A ..

. .13 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR. . .16 0 75. . 3 03 . . 3 66 . .. NMA . 14

OPER ATIONS (cont'd) f1GE LNOUSTAY ,Qffg, QfgQ hEnas EgAL TH!S AONTH LAST AONTH ]pf(fQ

- DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT... . . . .. N A .. . . NA .. .. N A .. . . N A .. .. N A .. .18 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS . . . .. N A .. .02 .0. .. N A ._ .. l .. ,19 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, .. NA .. ~NA. .. NA .. .. N A .. .. N A .. . 20 DOCUMENT REVIEW . . . .. NA .. _NA. .. N A . .. NA .. . N A .. . 21 MAINTENANCE

{1GE INTSTRY ,QfED, QffD hEDIAN COLL THfS MSNTH LAST AONTH M EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY . . . ,, , . . N A .. .. NA ..

.. NA . .. NA .. . . N A . . 22 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) . , .. . .. NA , .e4, .. NA . . N A .. .. N A .. . 23 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY.. , , , .. NA .. . . NA .. .. N A . .. N A .. .. N A .. . 24 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . .. N A .. . NA . .. NA .. .. NA . ..A. . 25 MAINTENANCE WOPK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) . .. N A . .. N A .. . NA .. .. NA .. .. A . .. . 26 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE),, , , .. .. .. NA .. .. NA . . 44 8% .. . 32 3% , .. A . . 27 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-OUTAGE) . . .. N A .. .65%, . 67.0% . . 52 7% . .l. .28 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE.. .. . . . . . . . .. , .. N A . . 0.5% .. . 0 97% .. .,. 0.16% . ..NMA . 29 NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS . . . .. NA . .. < 13 .. . 24 . . 20 . ..NMA . . 30 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME ,, , . . .. N A .. .10%. . 7.9% >. .12.1% . .l. . 31 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) . .. , .. N A .. .. N A . . 0 .. .3. .. ) . . 32 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE MAINTENANCE).. .. N A .. .. NA . .. 261. .266. . . l ., . 33 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) .. .. .. NA .. . 80% .. .. N A . NA .. .. N A .. . 34 -

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT).... , ,, , .. N A .. . 80% . . . N A .. .. NA .. .. N A .. . 35 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE).. .. N A .. . 80% .. . . N A .. .. N A .. .. NA .; . 36 ii

MAINTENANCE toont'd)) PAGE W NSTRY ,QE2Q, QPfD kED:AN QQ&L TH!S 6.ONT4 LAST h4WTH ]f3$

PERCENT OF COMPLE1ED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) . . .. N A .. 80% - .. N A . .. N A . . ,. W A .. . 37 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) . . .. N A .. . 80% .. .. N A . .. N A .. ..NA., 38 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVE!LLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS . . .. N A . NA. .0. 0 ..l. . 39 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT REL! ABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES . .10/mo. NA .0. .0. .. NA .40 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES . . .. NA .. ,. NA .. .. N A . .. - . . . N A .. . . . . .. N A . . 41 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . . . N A .. , . N A .. . NA . .. NA . .. NA . . 42 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . .. .. NA . . 2 00E-6 . . 6 07E.7 . . 6.07E.7 . .. N A . . 43 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION fMGE m ,uSTnY ,Q2fQ, Q/f,Q krcaN QQal TH!9 9.OMTH LAST l.ONTH M COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).. .. . 277NR . . 250'NR .. . 3 97. .. NA .. .. NA .. .15 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE.. .

. 4,060/YR ... 3.000NR - .0. N A .. N A .. .16 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY.. . 0 34 . ..r 15 . . 0 464 .. . 0 463.. .. NMA . . 44 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . .. NA .. . 2% . . .0%. . 0% . .. l .. . 45 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS . . .. NA ,. . 2% . . 0 .. .0. .. l .. . 46 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS

- OUT-OF SERVICE . ... .. ..NA . . 5 .. . 15 .. .,17 . .. NMA . . 47 l . .

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED . .. N A .. .. NA . .0. .154 5.. .. l .. . 48 i MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem) .. .. N A ., .1.500NR . . 416. NA- .. N A ., . 49 t

1 - TOTAL SKIN AND l' CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS . , .. NA . .144. .5. .. NA . .. NA .. . 50 l DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA . ..~... .. . .. NA . .88%. . 87.8% . . 89 9% . .. D . . 51 iii -

CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION (contd) f1GE INOUSTRY pffQ, ,QffQ ME Di.AN QQ&L TH'S LONTH LAST LONTH TREND RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM . . , , .. NA . .. N A , .4 .2. .D. . 52 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS . .. N A ~ , 68 . 63 . .NMA. . 53 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (cunes).. .. N A . .340. . 358 5. .. N A . .. NMA . . 54 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.. .. N A . . 225,. .176. .. N A . ~ l .. . 55 SECURITY PAGE INDUST RY QPPfD QDfQ hrO!AN QQ&L TH'S LONTH t AST LONTH IPJQLQ LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) . . . . . N A ..

. .. N A . . 62 . .. NA .. .NA. . 56 SECURITY NON. SYSTEM FAILURES . . . - . . ..NA. _ NA ., .. NA . .. N A .. .. N A . . 57 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES. .. NA .. N A .. .. NA . . . N A .. .. N A . . 58 M ATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES PAGE INOUSTRY QEfD QPfQ M QQ6L TH!S LONTH LAST F.ONTH IfffQ AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE).. . .. N A . . 3 5% .. . 3 9% .= . 1.9% ,. ., N MA .. . 59 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ($ millon).. .. NA . .. N A .. .14. 2 .. .14.2 .. .. N A . .60 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands).. .. NA . .NA. .259. . .. . N A .. .. NA . . 60 INVENTORY ACCURACY. . .. . .. . .. NA .. . 98% .. .. M% . . 98.3% . .. l . . 61 STOCKOUT RATE. .. . ., .. NA .. .2%. . 3 8% .. . 2.4% .. .. NMA .. . 61 EXPEDITED PURCHASES.. . . . . . . ... NA . . 0.5% .. . 0.2% '.. .1%. .. I . . 62 INVOICE BREAKDOWN. .. .. . . .. N A .. .. N A .. .. NA . .. N A ., .. NA . . 63 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING., ..NA. NA .. .41%. . 38 9% . . ..D. .63 DESIGN ENGINEERING f1GE INOOST RY QPf,Q QP22 AFD!AN QQ&L TH's kr*N tAST LONTH M OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS., .. NA . .. N A .. . 251.. . 204 . .. NA .. . . 64 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS

- (EXCLUD'NG SCAFFOLDING) . .. N A . . 0 .. . 25 .. . 21 ..NMA . . 65 ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN . .. NA .

. .. NA . .143. .126. .. NA .66 iv

_r. . . , 4 a.-

l I

DES!GN ENGINEERING (cont'd)  !%GE ]

LNDUSTRY QPfD CffQ l MEDIAN QQAL TH!S LONTH LAET LONTH TREND ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS . .. NA . .. NA 156. .168. . NA. . 67 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN , ..NA. .. NA .. . NA . NA .. ..NA. . 68 INDUSTRI AL SAFETY iSQE innusTRY DfER Rff2 ME D.AN QQAL TH!S AONTH l Ati AONTH 1852C DlS ABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . ..o 72 -o3 ..o . ..o 37.. . , l .. .17 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . .. N A .. . 2 0.. . 2 37. -..3.32 .. NMA . . 69 HUMAN RESOURCES f%QE INDUSTRY QffQ QEEQ urDAN QQAL TH!9 ACNTH LAsT AcNrH inEND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs . . ... N A . NA. 1. .3. . . l .. .. 70 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN.. ., NA .. NA. .NA. .. N A .. ..NA, . 71 STAFFING LEVEL . . .. N A . NA .. _NA. , N A ..

NA, . 72 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE . .. NA .. . NA .. .. N A . .. NA . .. N A . . 72 l

TRAfNING AND QUALIFICATION fMGE EDJSTRY QffQ QfEQ grDAN QQAL TH'S LONTH LAST l.ONTH M LICENSED OPERATOR i REQUALIFICATION TRAINING.. , .. NA .. .NA. .. NA . .. N A -. -. N A .. . . 73 p

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS.. . .. NA . .. NA . .. N A . .. N A . mNA. . 74 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS. . . . .. NA ;. . NA . .. N A . .. NA .. .NA. . 75 l

l TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS . . . .. . , . , ,, N A . . .. NA . . 2.162. 42,044.. ..NA. .76 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING., .. N A .- . NA . . 9.674, . 10.180.. .. N A .. . ,,77 l

V l

REFUELING OUTAGE PAGE INSUSTAY QffD Qff2 M AJ QQf1 TH!S MSNTH 1 AMT MSNTH Ifffg EMERGENT MWO PLANNING STATUS . . NA ,. . . NA .

. ,163 .. .182. .. N A .. . 78 OUALITY ASSURA J.E EAGli tNnosTny affa can m coal Tws mNm t_AST WUH IRE.ND VOLATIONS PER 1000 lNSPECTION HOURS .. . . . N A .. , .1. 6 .. .,1.24 .. . 0 84 .. D . . 79 COMPARISON OF VIOLATONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS . .. , , , .. NA . .. NA .. . NA . .. N A .. . NA . . 80 CUMULA1,VE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) . .. NA . . NA . . 6/3. . 7/2.. .. N A . . 81 OUTSTANDING COARECTIVE ACTON REPORTS . . . ,, N A . . . NA , . 70 .. 71 . ..l. . 82 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS.. . .. .. N A .. .. NA .. .. Or7 . . . 2/12 .. l . . 83 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VOLATIONS ISSUED vs.

LERs REPORTED., , . , , .. N A .. .. NA ., .. NA . . N A .. .. N A . . 84 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS , . . 85 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX . .. . . . 92 REPORT DISTRIBUTON LIST.. . . . . . _ . , , . . . .. . 94

SUMMARY

SECTON POSITIVE TREND REPORT.. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . , . . .. . . . . . . . . , . 95 ADVERSE TREND REPORT... . ., , .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . 95 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT. . . 95 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES , . .. . . . . . . 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

TREND SYMBOLS A ADVERSE TREND

1. lMPROVED PERFORMANCE

. D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA = NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTON NA - NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE-vi

i

- Net Generation (10.000 Mw hours) 50 - i 40-36.17 34 61 35.05 -

- T ld &

,# GL n;s

,_ a dry 31.18 zitz jgj 30 c3

$30-I -',6 94 -

27.9 qq3

@dw [ ,

ff JG pr y 1 a

kkN 23 23

ye 21.93 y 1 Mar hff ,

hg[)

-7 m 23 ,3 p{ty{j j (gfff ggd;g ,aQ g

.o - w.n. _a w - ~ s -

qm o

fenN, easz*!- ym " '

,1 gq @yw& p a,

m5 .g'q;$

o ..

gla w Ki!  ;. f s y -

t 4 sv

% _ w l

,7 E;; @M @PR $ Wi$

gy .r +

3

?

1128 P FL

n. 1 -F F: ex a 4Gb gg 'e 5 y L' g@w$ I n4 #s2 10- pg ej  !

i l

l  ;;  ;; .

g y_ gp o~n e un: src

! E. @@d ye ~;i iPM

. . 1 5 .3 ma ea eiA 1 it b 1 -

11 y 6 yue M3 W RF N Q 1 8"4 M"9 "

WM i

"' # ~

0 -t i l l 4 i i l i I l i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92

.. STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the ne generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting i month. 1 During the month of January 1992, a net total of 306,777 MWH was generated by the L Fort Calhoun Station. The low net generation for the months of September and October 1991 is due to the following three forced outages: 1) the station batteries replacement

. outage from 9/12/91 at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> through 10/6/91 at 1114 hours0.0129 days <br />0.309 hours <br />0.00184 weeks <br />4.23877e-4 months <br />; 2) a steam leak on the drain line from a turbine control valve was repaired from 10/18/91 at 0307 hours0.00355 days <br />0.0853 hours <br />5.076058e-4 weeks <br />1.168135e-4 months <br /> to

- 10/19/91 at 1116 hours0.0129 days <br />0.31 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.24638e-4 months <br />; and 3) a steam leak repair on a test pipe on the high pressure turbine shell from 10/25/91 at 2204 to 10/26/91 at 0810.

Data Source: Station Generation Report

. Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 1

l l

Forced Outage Rate GOOD

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals V -O- 1991 Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

15%-

{ 93 10%-

k[ k  !

j 5%~

1.4

'89 l!-l!

-1 90 '91 i 0% #

C O O

O O

O O

O 04 N#

O O

O Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 O

O O FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 7.1% for the time period from 2/1/91 to 1/31/92.

A forced outage occurred during the months of September and October 1991 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6 /91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off line on October 25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tar un the high pressure turbine.

A forced outage occurred during the r.ionth of August 1991 to replace a failed potential l transformer (PT). This PT converted 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchroniza-l tion circuit.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for Forced Outage Rate is 4.5%. The 1991 goal was 2.4%.

l Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms l Accountability: Patterson

' Adverse Trend: None 2

3-P FCSReactorScrams

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

-a- 1995 INPO Industry Goal 2- -O- Industry MedianValue O O O O D--C O O O O O O I- A A A A A A A A A a a a 0 0 0 0 i i i i i 06 6

'88 '89 '90 '91 Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in January 1992. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1992 goal for unplanned automatic reactor mrams whle critical has been set at zero. The 1995 INPO industry goalis one per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> tritical.

The indust y median value is 1.7 scrams per 7,000 bcurs crnical.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licanue Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 3

3-O Safety System Actuations

-G-- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal

-G-- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2- GOOD V

1 1-I i , , ,O h-c , c , c , c , D- r 0 i 0 ioi 0 -C i i 0 i

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNPLANN.iD SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of January 1992.

The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operatinns Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 4

- 12 Month Running Total SSA

.-1000 e-. Critica! Hours

-90 O Safety System Actuations (SSA) 8- -800 7 -

D

(

T p

-700 5

f S

[ g 6- , -6CD $o E

\/ -500 5 t t B (j

e Q4-s f -400$

b d -300

1. /

ll 7 2

2- -, -

\ -200 f l$ [ -100 0

}it f a

?l V

, , , -, 0-%: -0 ,

'89'90'91 FMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJ 1990 1991 1992 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG 2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG-2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the cafety bus in either of these situations.

The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun. The l

1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of three.

o Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 5

-N- High Pressure Safety injection System Unavailabity Value

--O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (0.008)

-b- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.02) GOOD 0.025_.

-O- Industry Median value (0.008) y 0.02 - A A A A A A A A A A A A 0.015 -

0.01 -

O O C C C C C C C C C C 0.005 - M 0 , , , , , , , , , , , i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection System value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The High Pressure Safety injection System value for January 1992 was 0.005. There were 11,1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> of planned unavailability for surveillance tests and PMOs in January.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.008. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 0.02 and the industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 0.008.

Data Source: Jaworski/Schaffer Accountability: Jawo rski/Schaffe r Adverse Trend: None L

6 l

<-____-____m_m__

~

l

-N- Auxiliary Foodwater System Unavailability Vttue

--C- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

-b- !995 INPO Industry Goa!(0.025)

GOOD

-C}- Industry Median Value (0.014) 0.03-0.025- a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 02-0.015-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O 0.01- O- C O O O O O O -C O O O 0.005-0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 92 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater System value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Auxiliary Feedwater System Value for January 1992 was 0.0005.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.01. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 0.014.

Data Source: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Accountability: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Adverse Trend: None 7

-M- Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

Y

-A- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.025)

-C}- Industry Median Value (0.017) 0.03-b b b b b b b b b b b b 0.02-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.015 -

0.01 -

0.005-0 X , , 3 i i , , , , , , i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Periormance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Emergency AC Power System value for January 1992 is zero.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 0.017.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None a

13-O Monthly Gross Heat Rate

-A- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate h

N 12-

^

R GOOD 11- V 10520 103o4 10023

] :P#4 .A.

10-I 3

,. m,. ..- -.) ,

g ,,

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GH. for the repor1lng month, the year to-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,'.17 BTU /KWH during the month of January 1992.

The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,117 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Popek Adverse Trends: N0ne l

i-

l

- Thermal Performanco

--O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (98 2%)

- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (99.5%)

-O- Industry Median Value (99 0%)

100%-

9 8 % -.

E O---C eeeeeeeeeee O O- O -O O O O O O O 90%-

94%-

92%-

90%- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Thermal Performance value for the reporting month, the 1992 Fort Calhoun goal, the ' 395 INPO industry goal and the industry median value.

The thermal performance value for the reporting month is 99.2%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 99.3%. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 99.5% and the industry median value (for the one year period from 7/90 through 6/91) is 99.0%.

Data Source: Jaworski/Popek Accountability: Jaworski/Popek .

Adverse Trend: None 10

I 100 % - ,

0 Monthly EAF + Year to Date EAF B5 6 77 80% -

56 6 60% - A GOOD 40% -

20%-

J r

i i 0%- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'89 '0

, '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 l EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year to-dato EAF for 1992, and the EAF for the previous 3 years. The EAF for January 1992 was reported as 83% This reflects coastdown in preparation for the 1992 refueling outage.

The year to-date EAF was reported as 83%.

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 11

O unit capaninty Factor i

-O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (69.2%)

1995 INPO Industry Goat (80%)

-O- Industry Median ( 73.3% for a Three Year Average) 100 % - -

li 80%- d ^ ^ ^

' A---

^

A ^ ^ ^

A A h

b b b= b 0

40%- 5-20%-

ll 0% , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unit Capability (UCF) Factor and the 1995 INPO Industry goal.

'I he UCF was reported as 100% for the month of January 1992. As stated in !NPO's November 1991 publication " Detailed Descriptions of International Nuclear Power Plant Performance Indicators and Other Indicators", the energy losses associated with the fuel coastdown prior to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage are not considered when com-puting the UCF because they are considered to be under the control of plant manage-ment.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 80% and the industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 73.3%

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for Unit Capability Factor is 69.2%

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report I

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: Nona 12

40%-

- Monthly Unplanrod Capabikty Loss Factor 35%-

-O- 1992 Fort Caltcun Goal (4.5%)

30%- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (4 5%)

-O- Industry Median (8.9% for a Three Year Average) 20%-

15%-

~

C C C C C C C C C C C C 5%- g 3 3 3 g g 3 g 3 3 3 g 0% , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF) , the Fort Calhoun UCLF goal for 1992, and the 1995 INPO industry goal.

The UCLF was reported as 0% for the month of January 1992.

The 1995 INPO industry goal is 4.5% and the industry median valtie (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91)is 8.9%

The Fort Calhoun goal for Unplanned Capability Loss Factor is 4.5%.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson ,

Adverse Trend: None 13

_. ~ _ .-

e Pues Het6mbaltty anoscator -- gg t eon INPO Industry Goal (0.6 NanocurfewOtarri) g .O- inou. ,v u . oi- n v iu . o .. N . n<m u , ..,o .. , o a<. -

3 J

~

gm .a ,

" D - - Q -- O" -O- O- -Q- O g - n .. .....-% ..

.w - . g a 6 a .. g ...  %. - p., .. g Febei Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Den Jan92 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliabiiity Indicator (FRI) was repor1oc s 3.03 nanocuries/ gram for the month of January 1992.

The plant was in the *coastdowff mode for the end of full power life for the Cycle 13 core.

The January FRI was calculated using the data from January 1 through 17. In accordance with the INPO definition of steady state operation, the plant was at power levels above 85% during this time and the power levels did not vary more than + or 5% for at least 3 deys. Only the iodine concentration values f rom the days that meet this steady state enteria can be f actored into the INPO fuel reliability indicator.

increasing values for the FRI have been observed approaching the end of Cycle 13. A number of f actors contributed to the increase in magnitude of the FRI values.

First, it is normal for FRI values M 'v:rease over the lif e of a fuel cycle because of increasing reactor coolant activity levels. This has c abserved through past fuel cycles at FCS, and is an industry trend.

AnoWa* factor is administrative in nature, in that the required INPO method for calculating FRl changed.

Thirdly, tramp uranium,1134, is a product of past fuel f ailures (Cycles 7 through 9) that has plated on reactor coolant system and vesselintemals, and on the fuelitself. Frequent power maneuvering with operation from maximum power levels to rnuch lower power levels or shutdown increased the Iskelihood of releasing tramp uranium products in the coolant thus increasing activity levels normally associated with Iailed fuel. .

Also, th9 reported coolant activities, specifically the iodine values, are a direct factor into the FRt calcula, tion. Reactor coolant activity reporting is currently under review for uniformity to the methods used by other utilities.

The last detected fuel failure was dunng Cycle 10. The FRI values observed during Cycle 10 were in the 20 to 80 nanocurie/ gram range (without the density correction f actor which would make the FRl values larger). There may have been one observable iodine spike which occurred during shutdown and would be indicative of fuel f ailure during Cycle 13 operation. An investigation is in progress as to the mearkg of this spike.

A For'. Calhoun goal of 0.75 nanocuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fort Calhoun recognizes the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 0.5 nanocuries/ gram and will revise our FRI goal accordingly upon completion of the current FRI re evaluation by INPO and the issuance of a revised EPRI fuel raliability program.

The FRI will not be applicable while the plant is shutdown for the refueling outage in February, March and April, and will not be reported during these months.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Accountability: Patterson/Spilker Adverse Trend: None 14

.I

Personnel Cumulatve Radiation E rposure (Man.

Rem)

-G- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (250 Man-Rom)

-A- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (185 Man Rem)

-O- Cycle 14 Refueling Outago Goal (210 Man. Rem) 400- GOOD 300 -

2M

E O O ^

O O O O O O O O O

; 200- U U U

A A A A A A A A A A A--A M

I 52 100-f$/k 0 *

, '4 - , - - i

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During January 1992,3.975 man rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year to date exposure le 3.975 man rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1992 is 250 man rem. The total Cycle 14 refueling outage goalls 210 man rem. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 185 man rem.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Positive Trend SEP 54 15

~ _ - . . ~ _ . - - _ _ - . . - - ~ _ _ _ - - - - - . - . - - . . . . - . - . . - _ . . .

12000- D Cumulative Dry Active Wasto Sent For Processing (in cubic foot) j Booo~

400o -

o , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Gop Oct Nov Duc92 '

l Cumulativo Radioactive Wasto Buriod

-- O -- Fort Calhoun Goal For Wasto Bunod (3.000 cubic foot)

-&- 1995 INPO Incustry Goal (3804 cubic foot) 7500- --O - Industry Modian (4000 cubic foot) 6o00- C nadioactive Waste Buriod This Month (in cubic foot) e m  ;;;;: g--a -

a-e-a a-s a

a a--a-g-myg 1304 1500-WAA W ' o

'90 '91 Jan92 Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc 02

. Year.ond Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulativc volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of December 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive  ;

waste. ,

i Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 0.0 Volume of solid radoactive waste which was buried dunng the month of December (cubic feet)334.1 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1991(cubic feet) 1,334.5 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of January (cubic feet) 0.0 Cumulative volume of solid radoactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet) 0.0 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary s'orage (cubic f eet) 0.0 The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 3,000 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 110 cubic meters (3,884 cubic feet) per year. The industry median value is 115 cubic meters (4,060 cubic feet)-

per year.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP54 16

l

@ 1992 Disabbng Injury / Illness Frequency Rate 1.6 - X 1991 Disabhng injury / Illness Frequency Rate 1,4 - -H>- 5 Year Average Disabbng Injury /fllness Frequency Rate GOOD i2_ -O- Fort Calhoun Goal (0.3)

+

1- -A- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.5) 0.8 -

0 A A -

8 A l OA- .

C O . O O O O v 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 -

0 = 4 =i n i i i i i i i i i i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the 1992 monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate in column form. The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) of the corresponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rates are also shown.

There were no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in January 1992. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is zero. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.3. The 1995 INPO Industry goal is 0.50.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.

YSm Year End_Balgt 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 1991 0.4 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Richard Positive Trend SEP 25 & 26 17

_ _ . , _ _ ..__ _ . . ____ ~ _ . . . - , , _ __ _ - - - - -

i t

E Thermal Output

-O- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal

- Tech Spec 1500 MW Umit 1500-  !

1450-1400 - l 1350-

! E

• 1300 - i 1250- l 2 i

-1200-h J 31150-1100-  !

1050-1000-  ;

4 950-  ;

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 i DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during Decem-ber 1991, the 1500 thermal megtwatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

• The power level declined during January 1992 with End of Life power rundown prior to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, ,

1 Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch 1

Adverse Trend: None ,

18

'- - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _.,..,,.._,#w,e .m_,,__.~emr.. ._.,.3co...-.m.m,-.w,,,-g..,,,,.y .. p,

I Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.0 -

-O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (0.2) 1.6 -

~

1.4 - GOOD 1.2 -

1-0.0 -

0.53 o.6 -

0.s

! o.4 -

0,13  : 0.2 - C O O O O O O O O O O O n

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate per 1000 critical hours was zero for the month of January 1992. There were no equipment forced outages during January.

The most recent equipment forced outage was due to the station batteries being de-ciated inoperable and began in September and was carried into October 1991. In addi-tion, two forced outages occurred during the month of October 1991: on 10/18/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; on 10/25/91 the generator was taken off line due to t steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine.

One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The outage

- was required to replace a failed potential transformer (PT). This PT converted 345 KV to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit.

One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January 1991 due to the De-cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.2.

- Data Source: Monthly Operations Repor1 & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/ Jaworski Adverse Trend: None 19

1-Operations 1992 Budget ($ Mdlion) 80-0 1992 cumuiative Totai(s Manon) 60-40-20-0 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 80- amtencnce 1992 Budget ($ Mon) 60- 0 1992 cumuiat,ve Totai a5 uniion) 40-20-o Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

The budget year to date for Operations was 6,361,000 dollars for January 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through January totaled 5,434,188 dollars, The budget year to date for Maintenance was 1,008,700 dollars for January 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through January totsJed 1,079,674 dollars.

Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Scofield l

Adverse Trend: None t

l 20 o

1o00 -

Documents Scheduled f or Review

Documents Reviewod Boo-

-V- Overduo Documents Goo -

400 -

200-

\ % _

, _i Y '

h v --

o Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan92 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site ,

Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During January 1992 there were 201 document reviews completed while 96 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of January, there were 36 document reviews over-due.

During the month of January there were 90 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1994.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 21

_ - _ . _ _ - - _ - _ . . - - .- . . . - - . ~ - - - - - - . - - . - - - -

Q Number of Failuros/20 Demands 4-- Trigger Values for 20 Demands

.O Number of Fahores/50 Demands -- V - Trigger Values for So Demands O Number of Failures /1oo Demands - - Trigger Values for too Demands  !

8- ,

GOOD 6- V V Y Y -Y Y Y Y ---V f  ? Y Y Y 4 4 4 4 4 4 4- - . - -

7 "3 3 3 E - - - .

2-  ; -

d i

h b p

/s p

~

i bl L ,h: .

x kz f '

e 2

l f 4:

i 1 m

j

~ .x a a 7q o -

o _ o o 0 o fi ?q j M n j , $ 4 h

i

. . . i i i i i i , , i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. Thess trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1992 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the .

( respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes r.#1 valid and inadvertent starts, including all start only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteries. a load run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).- ,

l The demand failure which occurred during the month of August for DG 2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Tr6nd: None 22

i l

D DG 1 Failures /25 Demands j Q DG 2 Failures /25 Demands  ;

5- O Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal l l

L 4- C O O O ': O O O '; P O i 3-2 2 2 2 2 2 b 2- , q 7 - ,

n y

y y p" f Q f }

1- 1 y

H a

.;A 3

p ..

g a a

00 00 00 00 00 o 3

'ib O

f d O g k b 0 4 0 0

O h 0 f

I 4 i i I i i i i l i i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 DlESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of fai!ures experienced by each emergency diesel  !

generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands so the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will '

take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

Diesel Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

' Diesel Generator DG 2 'has experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air damper roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, and a seal failed on a jacket

-water pump in August 1991.

Data Sourcei Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski,Ronning AdverseTrend: None  :

23

O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavadabihty

@ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability O Estimated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavadability E Planned Hours of D.esel Generator No.1 Unavailabihty C Unplanned Hourt of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability

); 200 -

b '

150-j100- _

D 50-0 " - r4L T1 an i l i I I I i i l i I I Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 nu t, .i m.i.o uove. as on.e un .o.uo,ey erom mie s so so iroi O cumui.ov. Hou,. oe tx2.i un.ven.uany from prim so s erairst g3 cumui.ov. Hou,. or ex2.s un.v.s.uoar nom e e s ees to irration a comwi.uv. s.ue. oe to.i un.v.u.uiin y to, u.,,u.rv i e se ca cumvi.ov. sour. av en.e un.v.o.unar,o,s.no.,,ieur ro,i c.ihoun oo. io, e tivi io infairei is h

SO.

o

+ + E ,

N ,

a +

s noa

s. net oes now o.cos DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2 for sach month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for two time periods: from September through December 1991 and for January 1992.

There wero zero unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG-2 during the month of January 1992.

Fort Calhoun met the goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991. This goal is based on the 1990 INPO industry median value for diesel generator unavailable hours.

The 14.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of DG 1 unavailability and 18.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> of DG 2 unavailability for the l

month of October were attributable to planned maintenance activities.

- Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None L

24 i

400-D October 1991 Outstanding MW0s Noventer 1991 Outstanding MW0s O Decernber 1991 outstanding MWos 300- D January 1992 Outstanding MW0s k

200- h

$11 -

I

~

.I<

100-l O

I " IN I I I i i i i i 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba l Adverse Trend: Based on three cor.secutive months of increasing values for MWOs 3 -

6 months old and MWOs 9 - 12 months old, an adverso trend is indicated.

I 25

October 1901 400 -

November 1991 350 -

" December 1991 300 - - :'.

H ,$ i O January 1992 250 -

3 ',9 y y A >; M 200 -

y, 9 \

a_

z af ',# gC '{

150 - ig p' g' ! ,

4 'y' S -

100- -

) %.1 i

,T" . S' 7-  :

a  !

M 4,c l ;1 ~

%s -

U_;, :

w .z '

,, 9  : .<,-

7, y  ; .y9 y .

.p> -

m4 y J .

%e .

j y.g igi p  :,0 %

i i i i i TotalOpen MWOs Open MWOs>3 TotalOpen Safety Open Safety Open High Prionty months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

Th ndicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The number of open MWOs >3 months old is increasing because on line activities must be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: Based on increasing values for three consecutive months for Open MWOs >3 months old and Open Safety Related MWOs >3 months old, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 36 26

, + --w

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 60% -

GOOD V

40%-

20%-

0%

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE DACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reportirg month.

The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of January 1992 was reported as 44.8%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on increasing values for three consecutive months.

27

P.atio of Preventive to Total Ma:ntenance 90% - --O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals A

SO% -

GOOD 70%-

^

00% - C O O O O O O O O

_/

50% -

40% -

30% -

20%

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 67.8% in January 1992. The values for this indicator decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greater emphasis being placed on completion of MWO work (see p. 27 for the " Corrective Maintenance Backlog Greater Than 3 Months Old" indicator) during the battery outage.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 65%. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 28 l

~

--A-- Preventive Maintenance items Overdue GOOD 3%- -O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals V

2%-

1%- C O O O O O O O O Q b

0% i i a a a A i 1 .

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 PREVEt4TIVE M AINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-grams require.

During January 1992,1,754 PM items were completed.17 PM items (0.97% of the total 1,754) were not completed within the allowable grace period.

The percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue was higher in November because of a scheduling problem resulting in a delay in completing PM task paperwork.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 0.5% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 1% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue.

Data Source: Patterson/Unden (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trond: None SEP 41 29

@ Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable On Une Total Control Room Instruments Out of-Service 50- -O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals For Total Out-c'-Service Instruments 40-

~~~

. k. -

p- . . . - 4-

~~~~

} l_ , ' ' _ y ~

20= E 75 ~"'

! b 7/4 ff f .  %% 1, gf Q i --

'O- - - -

-

n g  :[/

5 10-

.% [

g gj gg i- r1 f

h, SS Q g 0

1 i 4 4 i i i i i i I Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicato; mows the number of out-of-service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operatiorn (on line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 24 out of-service control room instruments at the end of January 1992. A plant outage is required to repair 4 of these 24 control room instruments.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out-of-service control room instru-ments. The 1991 Fcrt Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out-of-service control room instruments.

Data Source: Patterson/Spilker (Manager / Source)

. Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 30 l

8W. -

Maintenance Ovenime 70% -

-X-- 12 Month Average

--C)- 1991&1992 Fon Calhoun "On-Line" Goals 60%-

GOOD-50%- ,

V 40%-

30%-

O C .C O C C C C C C 20%-

10%- .

- m v s, m - v s,

^

N __ 'I J

" ^ ^

0%

'Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun 'Jul .Aug _ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the abil_ity to perform the desired mainte- -

nance activities with the allotted r9 sources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reponed as 7.9%

during the . month of January 1992. The 12 month average percentage of ovenime hours

- with respect to normal hours was reponed as 7.8%. _

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours -

worked is 10%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba

. Adverse Trend:- None 31

._ . _ _ . . ~ . . _ , _.- . . - . .

l 15-0 Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O closed irs Related to the use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Procedural Noncomphance irs (Maintenance) 10-5 5- -

3 3 3 2 2 2 2 c..- _ _ _

1 1 1 11 0 -

k 0 0 000 000 000 0 0 000 O i 0 O < 000 0 , i , , , , , , , , , ,

Feb91 Mar Apr May 31 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance Incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related_to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes.

There were no procedura! noncompliance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of January 1992.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 32 .

800 -

o Open MWOs -O- 1991 Fon Calhoun Goal 600-

^

C C C C C C C C c C C 400-302 289 287 a u 281 ra 2ee 2e1 1.l,l,lv:l l l274 I i i I I i lls111 i i I i i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTEN ANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non-octage Maintenance Work Orders

.(MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting 00 nth.

The 1991 goal for this indicator was to have less than 450 corrective non-outage main-tenance work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 33

i Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

O Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C v 0 0 0 O O O O O V

O - }^

l60%

11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent nf the number of completed maintenance activities as

- compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical '

Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs,- MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations,-

and miscellaneous maintenance activities. ,

- The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is_805 Reoortino Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities

' Week 1. 84 %

Week 2 - 91 %

Week 3 91 %

Week 4 86 % .

Data Source

Patterson/bthmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountabilityi Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 34 u-. - .. .. .

- . - . .. ... ~ - - - - - - ~ - . _ - ~ - - - . . - . - . . . . . . ~ . . -

6 g- 5

. Cornpleted Scheduled Activities (PE) _;

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80%- O O O O O O -O "

60% -

40%

11/2 11/9 11/1611/2311/30 12R 12/1412/21 12/28 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of compl_eted maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure L Equipment Mairdenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs,

-calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

- The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Heoortina Month C'omoteted Scheduled Activities T Wee'K 1 97% -

Week 2' 86 %

Week 3 85% <

Week 4 69 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) .

' Accountability: Patterson/Bobb'a Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 -

i 35 g 4 rp +-- ---r -

,w - - - - .

4 y , - +i.

Completed St heduled Activities (GM)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal

(

100 % -

80% - C C C C ^

C C ^

C C 60% -

40%

11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 ud 1/12 1/19 1/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTEN ANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80% General Maintenance was unable to meet this goal for most of the time period graphed due to emergent work such as snow removal and additional maintenance support.

r Reoortino Month -Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 58%

Week 2 86 %

Week 3 '87%

l - Week 4 95%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba l Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 I 36 l

l

Completed Scheduled Activities (MM)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - O- O- C O O C ^ ^ ^ ^ / O 60%-

40%

11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 PERCENT OF COMPLET,5D SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 95%

Week 2 90 %

Week 3 - 80 %

Week 4 85%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend:- None SEP 33 37

Complete' Scheduled Activities (IC)

-O- Fort Calhcun Goal 100%q P

80% - C C -O-~ q C C C C C C 60% -

40%

11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12114 12/21 12/28 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) l l This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning 1 strumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activitiw includa MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

l l Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities l Week 1 92%

Week 2 97 %

Week 3 86 %

Week 4 85%

! Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

'8

3-l

@ Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2-1-

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

, , ,0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

93 '91 Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of January 1992, there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs.

The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

- Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 39

~O Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures Suspected NPRDS Component Failures 13

-A- Total NPRDS Component Failures s

s 10- ?x 8 8 J 7

7/ \7 7 Y

fy Eh

$ if Oh64 $ N yy>  % ..t 9 R"

?t g M 4/; @ & N 5- :n M m? T f 1 11 4 N $$ $ b $ s$ E Y 4

? 'l

?$ $  % $1 1 l, 'O T fii R i & M #  !? $ $ $

jjpl f g$

} h { f y 2 R $ 2

$IS I

sb

[

kW b d $

M kk

$s

?$ M

'e$ 1 b0 e-1 m 0 4 0 s 0 @ 0 @ 0 Y 0  % 0 W 0 $ 0 0 , _ ,_ , , , , , , , , , i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NFRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

L During January 1992, there were no confirmed NPRDS component failures.

l The industry average for confirmed NPRDS component failures is 10 per month.

l l Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

I 1

. Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None 1

40-

--5 , Greater Than One Failure 40- -+- Greater Than Two Failures 35- -e- Greater Than Five Failures o-

%. a 25-20-15-

• 0 10-N;  ; -t 5- 'W N 0- ,

0 -

i i i i i i 1

' Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 4 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES

- This indicator shows the number of multiple NPRDS reportable failures over the preced-ing eighteen months sorted by component manufacturer and model number. The indica tor is divided into three parts: manufacturer model numbers with more than one f ailure in eighteen months, manufacturer model numbers with more than two failures in eigh-l teen months, and manufacturer model numbers with more than five failures in eighteen months.-

During the past eighteen months, there were nineteen model types that had _more than -

one failure in eighteen months. Nine of these had more than two failures. Two compoa nent types, Gaulin P18 pumps and Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps, had more than five failures. The model types with more than two failures are: General Electric AK 2A-25--

circuit breakers (4 failucos), the OSPD3 (3 failures), Faulk Type Y couplings (3 failures),

Byron-Jackson 28RXL pumps (7 failures), Gaulin P18 pumps (13 failures), General Electric OR120 relays (3 failures), General Electric 12HEA61 relays (3 failures), Bettis -

CB-4155R valve operators (3 failures) and the pressurizer (5 failures).

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

A_ccountability Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None- .

41

--+- Components With More Than One Failure GOOD

--X-- Components With More Than Two Failures y 15- -i l

10-1 1

5- - -

v v v v> v v V / N/ (/

n n n n n n Feb91 Mar Apr - May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS 0 The Maintenance Effectiveness indicator was develooed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear _ Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tiona. Jata (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

. This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two tailures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should a_ ' indicate the c'factivenecs of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tomber 19" through January 1992 data. The data for February through August 1991 is.' .

based ' n a twelve month interval.)

During the last 18 reporting months there were 18 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 2 of the 18 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with'more than two failures are CH-1 A and CH-18.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

- Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None 42.

, , - ,e+ - - - , e ,_, _,

20-Ca!culated Check Va!ve Failure Rate per Million Component Hours

--6-- Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Componen, Hours 15-

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 10

- 10-0 GOOD w

5 V Oi 5-P 1

O O O O 0

i i

'89 '90 Feb91 Mar Apr May in Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 Check Va!ve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For October 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.07 E-7, while the ind, y reported an actual failure rate of 2.75 E-6. At the end of January 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of 6.07 E-7.

The 1392 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E-6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager /Sourca)

Accountability: Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 43

- . _ . . .- -~- - ~.-, __- - ~ . - - . _ _ ~ . _ _ . . . . - . - . . - . _ .

- secondary system CPI

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal (.45)

--A-- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.30) l Secondary system CPI Limit GOOD l

~

-C}- Industry upper Quartile 1- l l l l , l l l l l l l N

0 se o.34 0.5 -

.&. .. g g 3 g .. .. .. .. ,. .. .. ..

g s- i io , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'so So Jan9t Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec91 to%-

8%- X  % of Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guideline 5 l GOOD l 6%-

V 4%-

2%-

0%

n" -

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI), is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator. blowdown, and condensate pump discharge. dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the percent of total hours of 13 parameters exceed.

ing the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

- The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. - The INPO 1995 Industry _ goal is 0.30.

- The CPI was reported as 0.464 for the month of December 1991. The industry upper

. quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPI industry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

The percent of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as--0.60% for the month of December. The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for collection and evaluation of the station chemistry-data.

Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Schmidt

Adverse Trend:- None 44

i 10*/,l-

)

% -- Primary System Chemistry Percent of Heurs Out of Limit  ;

8%-

6%-

GOOD v

4%-

2%- O C C C C C C C C C C C 0% '

A m m n r

Jan91 t eb - Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry..- Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.

Typically, lithium is the parameter that is out of limit.100% equates to all six parameters

being out of limit for the month. Th;s indicator is one month behind the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%

~

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0% for the month of December 1991.

A plant outage in November and December 1990 resultod in a higher percentage of .

hours out of limit.

' Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) ~

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith Adverse Trend;L None 45-

10%-

-M-  % of Hours Auxi!iay System (CCW) Chemistry is Outside Station Umits 8%- -O- Industry Upper Quartile GOOD 6%- y 4%-

2%-

0 0 0*/

' .89 90.' Jan91 Fb Mar kr iby Jun Jul Aug Sep ' Oct Nov Dec91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water _ (CCW) system is outside the

- station chemistry limit; The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting

. month due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data.

for the station.

l The auxiliary system chemistry percent of hours outside station limits was reported as L

0% for the month of December 1991. The last out of station limits condition occurred in l

June and was due to a low nitrite level in CCW coolant.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 2%.

I I

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith

! - Adverse Trend: None 46

G Number of instruments Out-of SorAco

'O~

- O-- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goats 17 1

5 15 14- ,  ;

gg_ h 10- [ ] ,

f 8-  ! j 6-Q C O""~~ ~~~~O~  % &' ~

O ' , - -

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).

At the end of December there was a total of 17 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Of these 17 instruments,13 were from the Secondary System and 4 were from PASS.

The increase in the PASS instruments out of service is due to removal of the germa-nium detectors from service while construction is being done in the old chemistry lab.

The increase in Secondary instruments out of service is due to a new method of deter-mining if an instrument is out of service. As of this reporting period, the entire instrument channel is considered inoperative it: 1) the instrument is inoperative 2) the chart re- '

corder associated with the instrument is inoperative,3) the alarm function associated with the instrument is inoperative. This change is being made because if any of the functions named above are not operational, then the instrument is not performing its intended function.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 5. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None 47

'vr E Total Waste Produced (Kilograms)

- Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg)

=

800 -

~ 600-400 -

200 - 1 54.s 39.9 34.9 9.7 pg y 15 4,9 15- o o o o; [jj, o i i i i , , . .. i i i ,

Feb91 Mar Apr - ' May Jun Jul- Aug Sep Oct - Nov Dec Jcn92 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun-each month? This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazardous waste,

- halogenated hazardous waste, and other_ hazardous waste produced.

During the' month of January 1992,0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazerdous waste

- was produced,0.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 -

kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

The amount of halogen.ated hazardous waste increased in December bectae of a change in the rnethod of record keeping. Hazardous waste is no longer counted on a -

monthly basis, it is counted based upon a full drum of waste.

. Date Source:_ Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)-

. Accountability: Patterson/Henning -

- Adverse Trendi None?

ir

l O Highest Exposure for the Month (mRen.)

@ Highest Exposuta for the Quarter (mrem)

E Highest Exposure for the Year (mRom)

- O -- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal CPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-3000-2000 -

Q 1000-416 416 416 0 g January 1992 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During January 1992, an individual accumulated 416 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1992 was 416 mrem. .

The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 416 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiatica exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis 1,500 mrem / year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 49

- . - . . - . . .. - . .. .. .- - , - - - . - .. . - ..~... . - _ , - . . - . . .

i 250- E Monthly PersonnelContaminations ,

- Cumulative PersonnelContaminations 200- -O- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (144)

GOOD

, t V

150-C O O O O O O O O O O O 100-55 -~

50-1~

i1 ~ ~ i f

'90 - '91 i 0 5-Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun

'Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting

. month. . A total of 5 contaminations have occurred duririg 1992.

~ There was'a total of 55 skin and clothing contaminations in'1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is.144, Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) i 4..

Accountability!. Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: NoneJ SEP 15 & 54-4

-'50 -

e p-- e a'- -

y (

- 100%- Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area

-O- Fort Calhoun Gcal(noncutage months)

90%-

C O O O O O O O O O 80%-

h 70%-

GOOD 60%-

50 %

f Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oc4 Nov Dec Jan92 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA

- This indicator _ shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based -

on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontamhated RCA for n.on _ outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non-outage .

- months.

At the end of the reporting month,87.8% of the total square footage of the RCA was

decontaminated.

~ Date Source: Patterson/Gundal(Manage'/r Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett -

Adverse Trend: None SEP54 51 0

. . . . . - _ - - .- . . . - . - . . ~ .- . - . . - . _ -

10-

@ Number of identified PRWPs 8-6-

4-3 I,

2  : 2 2 l'1I 2- .

1 1 [

O.: ..i i a i i. . i i e i i Feb91 Mar Apr May . Jun Jul Aug- -Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radio _ logical Work Practices Program l'ndicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

! . The number of PRWPs which are identified each month showd indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological Tperformance.

During the month of January 1992, four PRWPs were identified. The PRWPs were all j -; personnel contaminations.

p

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l l -Accountability: Patterson/Lovett u  :

Adverse Trend: None 'SEP52 H i

l i

52.

l~  !

l l

@ TotalNumberof Hot Spots Nurnber of Additional Hot Spots identified 75-68 65 65 -

63 63 63 g

p x ,., .. .~ xg,

.% V 53 53 54 54 54 55 .

g' g g g g

.. . 2,  :  : ;

4: tz z- w #

50- W*

84  %: * '

• 9 E W

m

& E -

9

w '

w  : ;

,: .c

.A #

g-

' 4 T&

I Es a, i: s K j,' ,

._ ,  % ,  : _, M, /A , .', ,-s'

,v W

d.

us s s .ws //s s ,/s  :, ,s

$, $ h.m $ $ $ $y. $

25- 2 s

fW I'

)* !#

.m 3

? ^

j$

s

.'4:

,a f's s* k#

w :9 3

e"

. ,- # i  : g .

4  % /A .,

e &

E # 72 )' #  :, &  :

M -

Fj-

$ i '

$3 L-10 l

a L

w

yj

.y L:  !

$ i ?g; $ $ $ 3 0

0

.j 0 f

h 1, !_. O

'f

0 g ,,1,,,

f e 1

! 0

1. 1 g 1 n i

t i

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.

- A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the it3m or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

During January 1992 one hot spot was eliminated in an elbow in Room 59. Of the 68 total hot spots reported this month,42 are considered permanent, there are plans to -

remove 20, and 2 are under evaluation for removal.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to resolve one hot spot per month.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trends: None 53

@ Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800- Curnulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

--O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600- GOOD 465 Y

400-h* c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 164 n

l 200- f,(g i i i 0 ' " N5 '~ ' ' ^

i , ,_ i , i , , , i , ,

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct - Nov Dec91 G ASEOUS RADIOAC11VE WASTE BEING DISCH ARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the envirofiment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through December 31,1991. A total of 358.5 curies have been released to the environment during this time.

In September,238.236 curies of gaseous radioactive waste was released to the envi-ronmeri due to containment purges required during the unscheduled maintenance -

outage. Most of the radioactive waste was released in the form of Xenon-133.

- The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal ;or 1991 is 340 curies for this indica- 1

- tor. .

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six . months.

Date. Source:' Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch

' Adverse Trendt None 54

s -A ,

4 &

lo .

g '0 9f IMAGE EVAL.U ATION ///, f

\g %*%q,'( ' t([9 TEST TARGET (MT-3) .

[f%

gl9? , fg

\pf7p k  ? ((

+ 4v 10 ,.

- un

I

,. ~

L -

._ um__ a 1*1 i

@l 1.8 llk ==

l.25 1.4 l,__1.6 4 - 150rnm >

< 6"

• e >er .s 4 4S++<f -

s[s'apy, q q/ u, ,%r%7f .

.. - <ep ;x //gb ap 3 g Oy .

9, W <

s 49 N:, - t_;j ',

d 4

A ~ 16 IO y;,qvv, ,s%  :.

g IMAGE EVALUATION  %

v,AP

'k[ V'h*9t TEST TARGET (MT-3) </ [J.1.olY

// v '

4 #

4 kg

% k +/ )fr> e l I N! ]h25

==== E [y El

,_ r,

.n l,l ums.

!I l.8 li v+=

1.25 1.4  ! 1.6 iem 1 l

1 4 150mm > i I

4 6"

• v>% ss A

g yg ,,p/ p 4f ,

_ _ 44,+ g,o

<p, w_ \

Oy/  :

sy&v O% ;l,y .;;_ % + ,

/

9%

e.c>

, v b,y' /g/o 0

T i> h

//g// %} kh!#

IMAGE EVAL.UATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) [/ Ok p6 ,ly[ egg

~

N

'///ps'.h 4 <t,,gt+d 1

l.0  !! A!A E L y[ffEE I.I t t=

e lpe ll 1.8

l! mas 1.25 1.4 1.6 j

l __

1 I

4 150mm > l 4 6" >

a&u 44 <+

+ -z+s Y $);;{ f  ;% ,, 7 : -

s 4tg //fd' o$>77 <

t e

sc

.A '

- AM$w.-i-if$ ..-. _

O Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged

- Cumulative Rad:cactive Liquid Discharged GOOD -

-O- Cumulative Annual G0a!

300 , V 231 228 175 C O O O O O O O O O- O-O 200 -

e

's ..

U 100 -

28.2 #is,2 22.7 28 4 33 9 p;g- "4 B"8.3 2.3 84 91 q p 5.3 63

, , , , 0  ; 3- , , , , , , , , _9

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 40000-8 y 30000-

{C 20000-h 10000- /

9 2370 2910/ 3800 3360 3750 3010 3040 3910 2320 3090 2670 E

O m' i i I 4 I'~~l i i i F-~~1r**-~4 A 1420 rm Iz urm e i 6 6 i l I Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Des 91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGEC TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through December 31,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 176.1 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid rdioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid G radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totalec' 35.7 million gallons from January through De-cember 1991. The ligt,id radioactive waste that ,as released to the environment in-cludes liquid released from the steam generaturs due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being dis-charged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: FrancciKrist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Positive Trend 55

30-  : Non System Failures GOOD 25- i i

20- Y 15-10- ,

5-0 i , , , , i i 3 i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 l

80- -

System Failures GOOD 70- '

60- 9 50-40-30-20-10-0 i i , i i i i i , , , i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG ABL E/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

Tha Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is Epicted in two separate graphs. The first graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non system failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number cf loggable/ reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of January 1992, there were 82 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fied. System failures accounted for 74 (90%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 37 (45%) of these were environmental failures. The 8 loggable non-system related incidents involved 2 incidents where plant personnel failed to follow proper escort proce-dures and 6 lost / unattended security badges.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 l

56 i

16-O Number of Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System Failures) 12-GOOD 8- V 6

4-7 2 _

s ,s.

. O O O , i i i Badges Access Control Security Force Error Unsecured Doors SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non-system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Security Badges. Access Control and Authoriza-tion, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors.

Non Svstom Failures Number of incidents Jan'92 Dec. '91 Security E Jges 6 1 Access Control and Autnorization 2 2 Security Force Error 0 0*

Unsecured Doors Q Q* -

Total 8 3

• New Periormance Indicator - no statistics for 1991.

Data Sourc 9: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accouritab.lity: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 57

O Environmental G Failuto GOOD 25-21 20- 18 V 16 ,.

15-

%i

y:

10- Nf g f.

{ 6 .

5- . 3 s 2

_ 2 l O li 0 1 0 i i i i i Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equipment Doors SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and f ailures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Fail-ures will be compared on a monthly basis.

Se Number of Incidents Januarv '92 December 91 Environs Failures Environs Faltures Alarms 16 18 6 6 CCTV 21 2 24 2 Computer N/A 3 N/A 0 Search Equipment N/A 6 N/A 0 Lv>or Hardware N!% B N,3 d Totals 37 37 30 12 1991/1992 SYSTEM FA! LURES COMPARISON Jan 91/92 Feb 9182 Mar 9102 Aor 91S2 May 9iS2 Jun 91'92 82/74 61/0 77/0 84/0 58/0 70/0 Jul 91/92 Auo 91/92 Sec 91/92 Oct 91/92 Nov 91/92 Dec 91/92 63/0 67/0 53/0 53/0 56/0 42/0 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick/Petersen Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 58

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 9%- --O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 8%- GOOD 7%-

6%-

5%-

4%-

o o -

e o e o o o 6 3%-

2% - --

1%-

0%

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUVAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amourt of open, non-outage mainte-nance items.

There was a total of 515 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 20 (3 9%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 and 1992 Fort Laihoun Goals for this indicator are 3.5% of the total number of open, non-cutage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser AJverse Trend: None 59

20-

- Spare Parts Mventory Value ($ Million)

.15-10-5-

0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of January 1992 was reported as $14,204,757.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Arcountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None

- Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 500-400-300-200 -

100-0 , , , i , , , , , i i ,

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec Jan92 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during January 1992 totaled $259,002. The value of the spare parts issued for November and December 1991 was not available due to a printer problem.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 60

Inventory Accuracy

' -O- Fort Calhoun Goal (98%)

C C C D C - C C 95% -

90%

Feb91 Mar Apr May . Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan92 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

During January 1992,651 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 651 line items counted,13 items needed count adjustments. ! a inventory accuracy for the month of January was reported as 98%. The Fort Calhoun J1 goal for this indica-tor is 98%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None

% of Pick Tickets Generated When

, , , Parts are not

, Avsilable. etc.

5%- -O- Fort Calhoun Goal l 4%-

C C O- C C C - O c.; C O 0%

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec JanD2 STOCKOUT RATE This inoicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of parts requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

During January 1992, a total of 1675 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1675 Pick Tickets generated,64 Pick Tickets (3.8%) were generated when the amount of parts requested was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not available. The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 2% and the 1992 goalis 2.6%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 61

2% -

% of Total Purchases that are Expedited

-O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)

1%-

C O O O O O O O- -O 0% , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Feb91 Mar Apr May .un Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During January, there was a total of 408 purchase orders generated. Of the 408 pur-chase orders generated,1 (0.2%) was an expedited purchase.

The expedited purchase was for sighi bubblers for leak rate rigs.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 0.5%.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager /Snurce)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser-Adverse Trend: None 62 i

10(-

80-60 -

42 40+ >

- og g 20 - b 14 22?9/4% tp;

!' ---l l@l'4N$$552??l S b??$?b$lQ}Wb$;f 0 ---- - -- -- --- '--- -

i , 3 Service invoicos COE invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN Th:s indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of January 1992.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Matedal Requests for issue with 100*<'

the Request Date the sarne as tho Need Date 80%_ --O-- 1991 Fort Calhoun boal G0%- C ---C -C C C C C C C C 40%- .j-2G% -

0%

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issue for the reporting month. The 1991 goal of 60% is also shown.

During the month of January, a total of 1675 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 1675 total MRs received by the warehouse,683 MRs (41 % of the 1675) were for issue with their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None c3

i 600 -

Total Modification Packages Open 500 -

425 425

~

K 't

• • • ~

J . ,

i 337 i  !' _

300 -

,- , ', 200

'88 '89 DO Feb91 t'ar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Categorv Reoorting Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 18 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 72 Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 94 Construction Backlog /in Progress 44 Desian Erar. Uodate Backlog /In Progress 23 Total 251 At the end o) onuary,3 additional modification requests had been issued this year and 1 modification request had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) had completed 15 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 12 backlog modification request reviews this year.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Accountability' Scofield/Phelps Adverse Trend: None 64 l

- - Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal)

.- Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Remo vable on line)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 6-5-

4-3 3~

2 <

.//, ,-/s: //. 2 g 2 2 2-  : ',, ': ':/

um . j..y' Rm J/;////

97 7 m;&, 7 O; , .

1- W% '///Q% ,

'qwl'/7,;.,:.

G'/ '

0

?bkh%$0h:

m i YR:h?bh v i

'$fv hbhYl i November '91 December '91 Ja.1uary '92 >

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal anc' the number of temporary modifications removable on-line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these modifica-tions are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. These are: Al-198 power supply failure alarm, and pressure indication for RW/CCW HXs. In addition, at the end of January there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on-line. These were: handjack close of CCW/

RW valves, which is awaiting a system engineering evaluation of EAR 91-282; and

- potable water supply piping temporary repair, which will be made permanent by ECN 91-077, issued 10/21/91, and ECN 91-370, scheduled to be issued 2/28/92.

At the end of January, there was a total of 25 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.

15 of the 25 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 10 are removable on line.

In 1992 a total of 7 temporary modifications have been installed.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 65

I 60-I' e November '91 50-December '91 40-

~ January '92 20- 17 18 18 1 0 2 2 2 2 .

0-3 months 3-6 months >6 months System Engineering 60-2 November '91 52 50- --

40- 35 32 33 30- .

. . . . January '92 [

20-  ! 16 15 17 s

0 - --- -

$83 0-3 months 3-6 months >6 months Design Engineering ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response from engineering.

At the end of January 1992,5 EARS were in the initiation process and 23 EARS had been resolved and were going through the closecut process.

Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 18 Ears closed during the month 14 Total open EARS open at the end of the month 143 Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 66

ECNs Backloggec;in DEN ECNs Opened During the Month

-V-- ECNs Completed During the Month 200-150-100-Y Y 7 qJ &

3 u 4 0

Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineedng Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of January 1992, there was a total of 156 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 35 ECNs opened, and 61 ECNs completed during the month.

l Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 67

l O DEN Engineering not complete O System Engineering - Engineering complete, response under review O Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete O Maintenance MWO complete, awaiting closeout 50- 44 42 40- 35 30- 24 26 , g 20- 11 10 e g,'

10 5 4 1 o pgggg i O - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN FACILITY CHANGES OPEN I DEN Engineer 6ng not complete O System engineering - Engineering compiete, response undei review Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete O Maintenance - MWO complete, awaiting closeout E

40- 31 30- 19 16 ' ~~'"""

l :- 'l 3 4 o i

p .,

6 4 i

9

. Mf I O - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN SUBSTITUTE FIEPLACEMENT ITEMS OPEN w

5 DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering - Walkdown or confirmaton not cornolete 50 - 45 40-30-

. 20 - 14 16 18 O

~

hf$kkkN O IIkh hk 1 hk ,

O 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months

- ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN.

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement items Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manage r/ Source)

. Accountability Fhelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 68 i

Q 1992 Recordable injury /Iliness Frequency Rate GOOD 5- 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 4.5 - -A-- 5 Year Average Recordable injury /fliness Frequency Rate V 4- O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 3.5 -

3-2.5 - 2 37 ]

2- O- 0 1.s -

1-0.5 -

0 , , , , , , , , , , i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1992 monthly recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate in column form. The 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates are also shown.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

There was one recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of January 1992. The recordable injury / illness case occurred when an employee experienced a back injury while removing a rail from a platform. There has been a total of 1 recordable injury / illness case in 1992.

The 1992 goal for.this indicator is 2.0.

Year Recqtdable Cases Year-End Rate 1989 11 2.2 1990 11 2.1 1991 18- 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Richard Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,25 & 26 69

50 - i e Ucensee Eventleports 46 Personnel Errors Reponedin LERs g 40- - Cumulative Ucensee Event Reports

--+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 32 31 '

y 29 i ': 30-26 7 i

,  ! .i :j i' l.  !

!. 20-

! , i 14 12  :

i. 9_

l} ll 10-i  !. l3

' ~

I

.k i

i 6

i' 10 h i , , , , , , , , , , ,

'8B '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LENS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with report dates during January 1992, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the four previous years are also shown.

In January, there were three LERt reported. One of the LERs were attributable to per-sonnel error. The LER attributable to personnel error was LER 91-30 " Containment Purge without Radiation Monitors in Service."

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accounta5ility: Patterson Adverse Trend. None SEP 15 70

K 0 Inadequate Administrative Controls LERs m

O inappropriate Actions, Human Error LERs ,

5- @ Equipment Failure / Malfunction LERs

@ Design Deficiency LERs 4- E Acts of Nature, Cause Unknown LERs 3- -

2- = - - ,

1- -- -

pp; -- - , - - - -

q 8

9 .--

l 2 9;  :

?.  :

-cs

.?

,5 j 7, ,

I ~ ' '

0 I i i i l 4 i i i i 6 l Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by report date and Root Cause Code for the months from February 1991 through January 1992.

Data Gource: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None m

71

600 - 545 545 O Actual Division sianino 400-Am r sn taming

^

206 204 200- s 50 51 0 I I I Nuclear Operations Production Engineenng Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized ano actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24

--C}- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate

-a- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10%-

-O- Nuclear Services Drvision Turnover Rate 8%-

6% - S 4%-

2% - -O--C O O c %. __c O --C O O 0%-

S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 091 N91 D91 J92 (

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate NOD 3.5%

PED 3.9%

NSD 2.0%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approxirncl.ca 2.5%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None 72 l

- - _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ____J

O Total Requalification Training Hours D Simulator Training Hours 60- ,

Non Requalification Training Hours E Number of Exam Failures 41 40-36 36 4

30- -

28

-' 24 24

22 - -

20- 18 18 I .

37

- , .. 16 -

16

.- 14 X -

] -

,{  : , ,

10-

@12 8 8  : << 8 d ,

y ,,, , .

9 4 4 ,

' ;I E ;; . Ei 4 T '

6 0-~ i i i i i i i Cycle 911 Cycle 912 Cycle 91-3 Cycle 914 Cycle 91-5 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew duri;.g each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Divisic:1 Manager lunches, Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

Cycle 92-1 will not be completed until February 1992. Data for that cycle will be pro-vided in the February Fort Calhoun Performance indicators Report.

Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 73

i O SRO Exams Administered 50- 0 snO Exams Passeo  ;

E RO Exams Administered 40- .O RO Exams Passed I

30-

/

20-  : ~ -

5 [ ,

c ),

10-

- / '; '

[' '[

[' {

~

0 i i i i i i  ; i i i i i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS f

This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor' Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and FiO candidates' monthly

. progress.

During the month of January 1992, there were twelve internally administered SRO exams taken and all twelve of these exams were passed. There were no internally

- administered RO exams and no NRC administered exams given during January.

( Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

' Accountability: Gasper / Lazar

' Adverse Trend: None SEP58 l 74 L_

R O Hotlinesinitiated

! 35 -

O Hotlines Closed 30- @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks

@ Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25 -

~

20- _.

1 15- -

10 - 4

_ _ _ -_ l f

\

n - . . 3 5- ,

- - ; 1  ; g g -

,  : e .

' r: e i

t

~

. I- ',

.- 2  ! I E

! 3 E p q '_l q__. }  !

i i i i i i i i i i i i Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, ard overdue greater thar four weeks for the reporting month.

December 1991 Initiated Hotlines 14 Closed Hotlines 10 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 5 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks. 4 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 75

Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Trsining (1000 hrs.)

@ _ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs )-

6-Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

y @ Operations (1000 Hrs.)

.6 4 - . .

E Y g ....

l. ....

3 h{ rg g

~'"

m 22- .

E L. I.] ....

1-3 >

lI; - ~

" C-5 g -

,= -

c n ,

0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the month of December 1991.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 91 DECEMBER 91 Operations 433 431 Maintenance 681 544 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 224 477 Technical Suppoli 124 230 General Ernployee Training 462 435 Other 120 45 Total 2,044 2.162 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 76

O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

O Chernstry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs )

, 25 - 5 Operations (1000 Hrs.)

B g 20-S a

$15-O -

m 2

g 10- gg

.. , E g - --

g M

M gy __ . . . ....

8 3 =,,

5 5-d x L;. \ ..-

_ _m _

y - -

- - - - -. = -

~

0 3 3  ; , , , ,  ;  ; , -i 3 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING Tnis indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations Maintenance, Chemistry and Rad:ation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, anc Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 91 DECEMBER 91 Operations 2,068 1,526 Maintenance 2,819 2,512 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 497 1.041 Technical Support 426 1,082 General Ernployee Training 3,782 3,306 Other 588 207 Total 10.180 9,674 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 77

1. Total Emergent MWOs 180- < Emergent MWOs Ready to Work 160- g m. r g i Emergent MWOs Completed We waW 140- g fg +

> Emergent Outage MWR Backlog 120- M m li 1% Di %

100-

$e@hn s

med 7

W qidg o 80-  ;- Jg pw 60- fgg ns 3 44

~

k~n, U$$$$$$$ :l 28 20- Yh"5b$k a%n)fkon h!Iph'!!h'h[:!l;p:l.

ununu, l ~

0

1. ' ## N

January 1992 EMERGF.NT MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

Outage-related Maintenance Work Requests / Maintenance Work Orders (MWRs/MWOs) identified after the Outage (2/1/92) are identified as Emergent Work. This indicator shows the total number of Emergent MWOs that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number that are ready for work (parts staged, procedures approved, and paperwork ready for field use). Also included is the number of outage related Emergent MWRs which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Approximately 3000 Maintenance Work Orders were completed during each of the previoits two refueling outages.

At the end of the reporting month, there were 163 emergent outage MWOs with 44 of these Ready-to-Work and a backlog of 28 MWRs. 35 Emergent MWOs have been completed.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Johansen Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 j 78 i

l-

Violations per 1000 inspection Hours 9- + Fort Calhoun Goal l

1 GOOD

$6- y 5 a W E 8

- 3.7 9 7 B l 'f 2.6 g3-2

.I--

l g -

5 C O O O O C O O O O

S I ,.]

0 T, , , , , , , , , , , , ,_ , ,

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 VIOLATIONS PEh 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.24 for the twelve months from January 1,1991 through December 31,1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.

Data Source

• Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 79

I 5-

@ V:olations per 1000 Inspection Hours (12 month Period) u a

Io4 C

o 0

o aa o J-

_C O

2.14 2.02 s 2- - m%

17

& #@s 1.61 1.53 96M aw ;x C

o 1 ~24 Mtwwa n

f5 1 34 32n n:n?

af stg Him esw e Qj$NM

• "n

'%w L,JcM9 SEE wwi t.9 tiy3ttL

= p. - w?neta isp ecS; 4 "hqi g dyp] 7. , *g agg gu g

.9 . m- 0 73 < fen n ~~ Fi * -

F"~$ P M

> .N [

pu hI ea mu "ih I-a A m I e;,,, ki m %ve,, M ag#mn Na;w% nw m; gym;'. ngM; .t:t sm- Ne# a ppt; 1qag ne 't Am rm aan 0

em v:~y rg w ygx ggg ~;wn em 6 i i 4 i 4 i i Fort Cooper River Commanche Wolf Arkansas South Waterford Calhoun Bend Peak Creek One Texas COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides e comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period f rom January 1,1991 to December 31,1991.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 80

25-'

O Number of Wolations Dunng the Last 12 Months 0 - Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 20- ,

18 7

16 15 15 - -

11 11 1 J

10- g j

. 7 7 7 7 7 'I'

n. 6 5 5 5 5 5- -

4 3 3

' ~~~ ~

2 2 2 2 3

0 i a i i e i i i i  ! i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative. Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator, Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 81

y . . . . . . . . . . . .

0 Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related

- A-- Outstanding CARS > Six Montns Old Total O';tstanding CARS 150 -

100 -

A 50 -  % __

0 Feb91 Mar - Apr May Jun sul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number

. of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

i At the end of January 1992, there were 70 outstanding CARS,40 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 3 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None 82

0-

-G- NOD Overdue CAD J 15-

- NOD C ARs With Emiensions Granted 10 -

0- -8~ 2 O w b O

~

M-Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92

~

--O- PED Overdue CARS 25-20- - PED C ARs With Exteni, ions Granted 15 -

10-0 I " # N " - '-'

N Fab 91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 6-5- -O- Other Overdue CARS 4~

- Other CARS With Estensions Granted 3-2-

N O- 3- r-G i w i D 7--C 3 , w i 6' r-C i c - N- 1 Feb91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan92 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTIOt1 REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS anti the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue _CAfis Overdue CARS Novernber '91 Dere:nber '91 January '92 NOD 0 0 0 PED 0 2 0 Otners 0 0 0 Total 0 2 0 <

Extended CARS Extended CARS November '91 Decernber 91 January '92 NOD 2 4 1 PED 4 ~5 6 Others 0 3 0 Total -] 6 12 7 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/Giles Adverse Trend: None 83

I

' 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signd. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operation.' 30 1 1 6 B)Rodolog Controls 12 0 3 0 C) Maint/ Surveil 66 0 2 9 D) Emergency 16 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 5 0 1 3 F) Engr / Tech Suppor1 93 3 1 12 G) Safety Assess 4 27 1 1 2 Qual Verd H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 249 5 9 32

^

1992 SALP Funct.

Area CARS SignH. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 2 0 0 1 B) Rad'olog. Controls 2 0 0 0 C) Maint/Surlit 7 0 0 1 D) Emergency 1 1 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 0 0 0 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 1 0 0 1 G) Safety Assess' 2 0 0 0 Qual. Verit, H) Other 0 0 0 0 Tota' 15 1 0 3 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reportr,(CARc) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs, the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs.

the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1991 and 1992. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Date dource: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Act Juntability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Advi se Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 84

PERFORMAf4CE ltJDICATOR DEFif41TIOf4S j AGE OF OUTSTANDillG MAINTENANCE WORK OR- CORRECTIVE MAIN 1EN ANCE DACKLOG GRE ATER c I DERS THAN 3 MONTHS OLD lhis indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor- The percentage of total outstand >ng cortoche mainte-rective non-outage Maintenance Work Oroers at the Fort nance nems, not requinng an outage. that are greater Calhoun Staten versus their age in months than three months oid at the end of the pered reported r

AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA.

Ths indicator is det.ned as the percentage of open, non- TiONS (12 MONTN RUNNING TOTAL) outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awa t- The cumulatne numtwr of vo:abons and Non Cited Vio-ing parts, to the total number of open, non outage, main- latons for the last 12 months tenance work orde's DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM lh6 indicator shows the dady cote thermal ou*put as PERFORMANCE measured f rom computer point XC105 (in thermal mega-The sum of the k*own (pianned and unptanned) unavas w a't s) The 1500 MW Tech Spoc tmit, and the unmet able hours and the estima'ed unavailable hours lof the porton 01 the 1405 MW FCS dady pou tr r the reporting auxihary feedwater syttem for the reporting penod de month are also shown.

yded by the crthcal hours for the reporting perod muttu phed by the number of trains en the aunihary feednaler DIESEL GENERATOR UN AVAILADIUTY s ytt em. This indca'or provides month!y data on the number of hours o' diet.el generator planned and unplanned un-AUXlUARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE avadabety, The Fort Calhoun goal for the second half of STATION LIMITS 1991 tot the number of unavadabte hours per d>et,el gen-The cumulative hours that the Component Cochng Water stator has been estabhshed based upon the 1990 indus-system is outs:de the staten chemistry limit The hours try median value provided by INPO ars ccumulated from the first sampi exceedmg the hma until additonal samphr.g shows the parameter u be back DECONTAMIN ATED RADIATION CONTROLLED within bmits. AREA l he percentarof the Radiaton Controlled Area, which CARS ISSUED vs, SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO. inuudes the musihary budding, the radwaste budding, and LATIONS vs LERs REPORTED areas of the CRP bunding, that is decontaminated based Provdes a mmpanson of CARS $ sued. NRC volations, 01 " e total square footage This indicator tracks portor-and LERs reported, Tha indicator trams performance f or mance for SEP s 54 SEP 815,20, & 21.

DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME CHECK VALVE F AILURE RATE ACCIDENT RATE)

Compares the Fort Calhoun check vatve tailure rate to The indicator is dehn>d as the number of accdents for the industry check valve f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 malon all utdny personnel permanently assigned to the stabon, component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate involving days away from work per 200,000 man hours -

is three months behind the Pl Report reporting month worked (100 marryears). This does not include contrac.

Ths indicator tracks periormance for SEP 843. tot personnel This indicator tracks personnel perior.

mance for SEP s25 & 26-COLLECTIVE RADI ATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA.

T1VE) DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNI AL)

Collective radiaton exposure is the total esternal w hole. The Document Review indicator shows the number of body dose received by all on site personnel (including documents reviewod, the number of documents sched-contractors and vanors) during a time perod, as mea- uled for review, and the number of document reviews sured by the thermotuminescent dosimeter (TLD) Cob that are overdue for the reporting month. A document lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man- review is considered overdue if the review is not com-rom This ind6cator tracks radiological work performance piele within 6 months of the assigned due date. "Ihs inde for SEP #54 cator tracAs performance for SEF 846.

COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS Provdes data on volations por 1000 inspecton hours for Regon IV nuclear power p; ants.

85 i

mm..m . . . . . . _ . - - . . . . _ . .. , ,

r

\

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIOt4S (Cont'd)

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE tem was disabacd for test purposs, if lotowed by a sue The sum of the known (pianned and unplanner) unavan- Cessf ul start anh the t,ta' ting M rtem in ns normal abgh-ab;e and the estimated unavadable hours for the emer. ment.

gency AC power system for the reporting perod deded Each emergency generator fadute that results in the gen.

by the number of hours :n the f erotting perod mv!!iphed orator being dectsred inoperable should be counted as by the number of teains in the emergency AC gener sys. one demand and one f adure Capbratory tests during tem corrective maintenance and the successf ultest that tol-lows repair to venty operabikty should not be counted as EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABIL. demands or f adures when the EDG has not been de.

ITY clared operable again This Indica't- shows the number of f adures 15at were reponed dunng the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die- EMERGENT MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 sel generator damands at the Fort Calhoun Staton Also REFUELING OUTAGE) shown are trQgY values which correlate to a hgh level Outage related Maintenance Work RequestsWIainte-of conf conce that a unit's diesel generators have ob. nance Work Orders (MWRS'MWOs) initiated atter the tained a rehabdity of greater than or equal to 9$% when Outage Scope F reeze Date (1073'91). i I

the demand f ailures are less than the trgger values.

1) Number of Start Demands: All vahd and inadvertent ENWNEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) start demands, including all start only demands and all BREAKDOWN start demands that are followed by load-run demands, This indicator shows a breakdown, by age of the E AR, of l whether by automatic or manualinitiaton. A start only the number of EARS asugned toDesgn Engineenng I demand is a demand in which the emergency generator Nuclear and System Enginsenng This indicator tracks is aarted, but no attempt is made to bad the generator, pertormance for SEP #C2

2) Number of Start Failures: Any f ailure wrthin the emer.

gency generator sye. m that prevents the generator from ENGINEERING CHANGE NOT1CE (ECN) BREAK.

achieving specified frequency and voltage is classif ed as DOWN o valid start f allute. This includes any conditon identifiert This indicator breaks down the number of Engineer i in the course of maintenance inspectons (with the emer. Change Notces (ECNs) that are assgned to Dess gency generator in standby mode) that definitely would Engineenng Nucleat (Db ' System Engineenng, aM have resutted in a start failure if a demand had occurred Maintenance The graphs provide data on ECN f acihty

3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a vahd bad run Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts demand to be counted the load-run a!!empt must meet open, and D Document Changes open. This indicator one or more of the following crnena: tracks periormance to. SEP sG2.

A)A bad tun of any duraton that results from a res' auto-mate or manual inniaton. ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS B)A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load and duraton The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were as stated in each test's speedcations. completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completon C)Other spec;al tests in whch the emerger'Oy generator by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks per-is expected to be operated for at least one hour while g formance for SEP #02.

baded wah at least 50% oi ns desgn bad.

4) Number of Load Run Failures: A load run f adure EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRIT 1 Should be counted for any reason in whch the emer. CAL HOURS gency generator does not pick up load and run eri pre. Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the dcted. Failures are counted dunng any valid bad-run inverse of the mean time between forced outages demands, caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to 5)Excentons: Unsuccessful attempts to start of bad run the number of hours the reactnr rs crnicalin a penod should not be counted as vahd demands or f ailures when (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages they can be attnbuted to any of the following- caused by equipment fadures in that perod.

A)Spurous inps that would be bypassed in the event of an emergency. EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR B) Malfunction of equipment that is not required dunng an This indicator is cet.ned as the rato of gross avadable emergency, generaton to gross maximum generaton, expressed as C)lntentional terminaton of a test because of abnormal a percentage Avadable generaton is the energy that can conditons that would not have resutted in major d esel be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum generator damage or repair, power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limo D)Maff unctions or operating errors which would have not tatons Maximum generaton is the energy that can be prevented the emergency generator from being restaned produced by a unit in a given perod if operated contino-and brought to load wnhin a fev, minutes. ously at maximum capacity.

E)A fadure to start because a porton of the startmg sys-86

PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

HIGH PRESSUFIE SAF ETY INJECTION SYSTEM EXPEDITED PURCHASES SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE $

The percentage o' naedetod purcnases which occurred lhe sum of the known (plannW and unplanned) unavam dunng the reportinp ;nonth compa'W to the total number able hours and the ust. mated unavadatie hours for the of purchase otder9 generated. ,

high pressure saf ety ing don system for the reporting P* "'d "d"d D Ih* C'C 8' h "'$ ' ' 'h8 '"D 'I'"9

• FORCED OUTAGE RATE Y number d Da ns m the Ngh

~

This indcator is dehned as the po'contage of time that n h \

me untt was unavailat>e due to forced events compared presssure safety injecten sy stem to the time planned for electreat generaton forced events are f adures or other unplanned cor@ tons tha- HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM) that are reapre remov ag the unft from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup fadures inmated, closed and overdue 6ess or greater than 4 weeks for the indcated month A HTM is a training docu.

ano events inftiated whde the unft is in reserve shutdown meant sont out for immediate rev+* The HTM should be (i e., the unit is avadable but not in servce) rev,ewed and sogned within 5 day 5 of receipt of the HIM FUEL REllADILITY INDICATOR T his indicator is dehned as the steadpstate primary cool-ant i 131 activrty, corrected for the tramp uranium contn.

. Total number of in-hne chemistry instrumonts that are b/on and normalized to a common purthcation rate U0I'Y'ce in the Secondary System and the Post Tramp uranium is fuel which has been depostted on re-actor core internals f rom provous defectrve f uel or is c4ent Sa@ng System @m present on the surf ace of fuel elements from the manu-f actunng process. Steady state is defined as continuous operaton for at least three days at a power level that e percentage of W noms mat are wW ead month by the wa'ehouse which need count adetments does not vary more than + or - SW Plants should coliuct data for th$ andicator at a power level above 85% when possible Plants that dd not operate at steady state lhe number of invoices that are on ho6d due to t,helf life, power above 85% should coflect data for this incNMor at COE, and rms.cenaneous reasons.

the highest steady state power level attained duting the e entity correcton f actor is the ratio of the specihe This indicator shows the numt er and root cause type for vNume of coo! ant at the RCS operating temperature (540 degrees F, VI - 0.0214) divided by the specthe konse bent NMs.

volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 g

degrees F at outlet of the letdown coohng heat en-This indicator shows the number of SRO and'or RO ge changer,Vf. 0016204), v ch results in a density cor-2es and exams that are administered and passed each recton factor for FCS equai .o 132, month. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP e68.

GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DIS-CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all OMMR ENEWN MM ING gaseous radioactive nuchdas released f rom FCS.

The total number of hours of train ng g*ven to each crew dunng each cycle. Also pr veed are the simulator train.

GROSS HEAT RATE ing hours (whch are a subset of the total training hours),

Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal the number of non requaltfeaton training hours and the energy in Brftish Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the number of exam Nlures. This indicator tracks training reactor to the total gross elect 4 cal energy produced by pertormance for SEP #68.

the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH)

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DISCHARGED HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The total amount (in Kilcgrams) of non halogenated ha2-D M WDEU lhis indicator displays the volume of hquid raccactive ardous waste, halcGenated haJardous waste, and other haJarcous waste produced by FCS each month. waste released from the radcactive waste monrtor tanks.

to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio-active nuchdes are detected in the blowdown system The cunes f rom au releases from FCS to the Missoun River are also shown.

87

PERFORMAt1CE It4DICATOR DEFitJITIOtJS (Cont'd) s 4

[

• CM t BLE REPORTA B LE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

, Nuclear Power Operabons (INPO). Confirmed hPRDS 3 in. total number of secunty incidents for the reporting commnent tailures are bat.ed upon iailure repo.ts thet il month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu- have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo-

! nty periormance for SEP458 nent failures are based upon f ailure reports that are St il

!, under review by INPO NPRDS is a utility industry users MAINTEN ANCE EFFECTIVENESS group p'ogram whch has been outirned by INPO and The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System implemented at FCS.

(NPRDS) components with more than 1 f a41ure and the number of NPRDS components wrm more ban 2 f ailures NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM for the last eighteen months. INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform as desgn MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG function is considered as out-of service. A control room The number of corrective non outage maintenance work instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order orders that remain open at the end of the reportinQ (MWO) written for R and has not been repaired by the month. This inmcator was added to the Pt Report to end of the reporting pered is considered out-of service trend open wrrective non outage maintenance work of- and will be counted. The duraton of the out of service dets as stated in SEP 836 conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con.

Sidered as control room instruments.

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of mrrective non outage NUMBEP OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN maintenance work orders by several categones that re- LERS main open at the end of the reporting month. This indca- The number of Lcensee Event Reports (LERs) attobuted tor tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36- to personnel error on the orginal LER submittal. This andcator trends personnel periormance for SEP #15.

MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The */. of overtime hours compared to normal hours for NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE-maintenance This includes OPPD personnel at weli as SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS contract personnel, The number of Surve: Hance Tests (STs) that result in Lcensee Event Repons (LERs) dunng the reoorting MATERI AL REQUEST Pl, ANNI'30 month. This indicato tracks missed STs for SEP #60 &

The percent of matenal requests (MM)ior issues wfth g3, their request date the same as their need date mmpared te the total number of MRs. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget ec,mpared to the actual enpen-MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE daures for Operatons and Maintenance departments.

The total maximum amount of radiaton received by aa mdrvidual person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterty. OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS and annual basis. This indicator displays the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS NUMBER OF HJT SPOTS that are older than 5 x months and the number of moddi-The number of rar.d.ogeal hot spots which have been caton related CARS.

ident;hed and documented to exist at FCS at the end of the reportir g month. A hot spot is a smalllocalized OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS source of radiaton. A hot spot occurs when the contact The number of Modifcaton Requests (MRS)in any state dose rate of an nem is at least 5 times the General Area between the issuance of a Modifcaton Number and the dose rate and the dem's dose rate is equal to or greate' completion of the drawing update.

than 100 mrem! hour. 1) Form FC 1133 Backk)0/in Progress. This number top-resents modifcation requests that hava not been plant NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES approved during the reporting month.

The number of NPRDS reportaole f ailures over the  ?)Modifcation Requests Being Reviewed. This category preceeding eighteen months sorted by component includes:

manufacturer and model number. A )Moddcaton Requests that are not yet reviewed B )Modificaton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA Protects Review Committee (NPRC).

SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED C )Moddcaton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear The data plotted is the total number of NPROS compo- Projects Committee (NPC) nant failures (conbrmed and possib;o) and the number of These Moddcaton Requests may be rev;ewed several confirmed NPRDS mmponent failures The total number t1mes before they are approved for accomplishment or of NPRDS component f ailures are based on the numbe' cancel;ed. Some of these Moddcation Requests are re-of f ailure reports that have been sent to the Inst:tute of turnM to Engineenng for more informaton, some ap-88

PERFORMAi4CE li4DICATOR DEFli4lTIOi4S (Cont'd) proved for evaluanon, some approvod for study, and related to the t .e of procedures (includes the number o' some approved for planning. Once planning is completed cbsed irs caused by procedural non<.ompt.ance), and and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Madi- the number of ebsed procedural noncomphance irs.

ficaton Requests may be approved for accomphshment This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP with a year assgned for constructon or they may be can- 815.41 & 44.

celied. All of these ditterent phases require teview.

3)Desgn Engineering Backlog in Progress. Nuclear RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM Planning has assoned a year in whch construct on will The number of identthed poor radiological work practces to compieted and desgn work ma, be in progress (PRWP) for the reporting month. This irgicator tracks 4)Construcson Backbg'In Progress. The Constructon radological work periormance for SEP e52 Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modificaton has not been accepted by the Syt tem RATIO OF PREVENTWE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE Acceptance Committee (S AC). The rato of preventrve maintenance (including surveil-5)Desgn Engineenng Update Backloyln Progress PED tance testing and cahMaton procedures) to the sum of ha, received the Madtficaton Comp'eton Retort but the nonsutage cortective maintenance and preventive ma:n.

drawings have not been updated. tenance completed over the reporting period. The rat o, The above mentoned outstanding modif catons do not empressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-include moditcatons whch are proposed for cancella- hours. T h:s indicator tracks preventsve maintenance ac-ton tmties for SEF 841.

OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FRE-REPORTS QUENCY RATE The number of overdue Corrective Action Reoorts The number of injunes raquiring more than formal first (CARS) and the number of CARS whch received exten- ad per 200,000 man hours worked. This indicator trends sons broken down by organization for the last 6 months personnel periormance for SEP #15,25 & 26.

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE- SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE NANCE ACTIVITIES INDEX The */. of the number of completed maintenance activi- The Chemistry Performance inden (CPI)is a calculalon teos as compared to the number of scheduled mainte+ based on the concentraton of key impurities in the sec-nance activities each week. This % is shown for each ondary sde of the plant. These key impurities are the maintena..;e craft. Maintenance activities include MWRs, most likely cause of deteroraton of the steam genera-MWOs, STs PMOs, cahbratons, and other miscella- tors. The cheestry parameters are reported oniy for the neous actrvrbes. These indcators track Maintenance per- penod of time wreater than 30 percent power.

formance for SEP a33. The CPI is calculated usin4 the follewing equatt.n' cpl .

(Ka'0 8) + (NC20) + (0,/1C)) / 3 where the following are PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE monthly averages of: Ka = avatage blowdown caton The rato of the number of turnovers to average employ- conductivity, Na e avera;a blowdown tod:vm concen-ment. A tumover is a vacancy created by voluntary resg- tration. O, - average condensale pump discharge dit-naton from the company. Retirement, death, terminaton, solved oxygen concentraton.

transfers within the company, and part time employees are not considered in turnover. SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES The number of Secunty loggaole4eportable incidents is PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE broken down into the following categories:

This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte- 1) Licensee Desgnated Veheles (LDVs) Incidents re-nance rtems in the month inat were not completed by the lated to the use of LDVs, e 9,, keys lett in the vehicle, y scheduled date plus a grace penod equal to 25 % of the loss of keys, or failure to return keys, r scheduled intervat. This .ndcator tracks preventive main- 2) Security Badges Incdonts associated wihmproper tenance activities for SEP #41. use and handhng of security badges. Incidentr[nclude security badges that are hst, taken out of the protected PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEM!STRY % OF HOURS OUT area, out of control on-si,,, or inadvertently destroyed or O F U MIT broken, The % of hours out of hmit are for six primary chemistry 3) Access Control and Authonzaton - Administrative and parameters divded by the total number of hours passible procedural errors associated with the use of the card-for the mor th. The key parameters used are Lithium, access system such as tailgating, incorrect secunty Chlorde. Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluorid4 and badge issued. and impioper escor1 procedures. This also Suspended Sohds. EPRI hmits are used. includes incdonts that were caused by incorrect access authorizaton informaton entered into the security sys-PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS tem computer, (MAINTENANCE) a) Security Key Control incedents involving Securr'y 6ey The number of ident6ed incidents concerning mainte- control, e g lost Security keys, Security keys removed nance procedural prob l ems, the number of closed irs 89 l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) from sne, or f ailure to return Securny keys. This type of TEMPORARY MODIFICA110NS event does not reflect incidents concerning LDV keys- The number of temporary mechanical and electncal con-This indicator tracAs secunty pedormance for SEP #58. figuratons to tne plant's systems

1) Temporary conf guratons are defined as electreal SECWUTV SYSTEM FAILURES Jumpers, electreal blocks, mechancal jumpers, or me-incidents involving Narm system f adures, CCTV fadures, chanical bbcks which are installed in the plant operating securny computer f aderes, search equipment f adures, systems and are not shown on the latest revison of the door hardware f ailures, and card reader fadures. These P&lD. schemallC, connecton, wiring, Or flow diagrams.

system f ailures are funher categorized as follows: 2 pumpers and blocks whch are instaued for Surved.

1) Alarm System Failure - Detecton system events in- lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Cahbration Pro-volving f alse' nuisance alarms and mechanical fadures. cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedutos

2) Alarm System Environmenta! Failures Degradatons are not considered as temporary moditcatons un!sss the to detecton system performance as a result of enviran- pmpt of bbck remains in place after the test or proce.

montal cond: tons (i e , rain, snow, frost)- dure is complete. Jumpers and bbcks installeu in test or 3)CCTV Fadures Mechanicalfadures to all CCTV hard- tab instruments are not considered as temporary modite ware components. catons.

4)CCTV Environmental Fadures . Degradatons to CCTV 3)Scaholding is not considered a temporary modifcaten performance as a result of environmental conditons (i e., Jumpers and blocks whch are installed and for whch rain, snow, f rost, f og, sunspots, shade). MRs have been submmed wdl be considered as ter'po-

5) Securny Computer Faavres Failure of the multF rary modificatons untd final resoluton of the MR and the plexer, central processing unit, and o!her computer hard- jumper of bbck is removed or is permanently recorded ware and software. This category does not include soft- on the drawings This andcator tracks temporary modith ware problems caused by operator error in using the catons for SEP a62 & 71.

software.

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, meta', THERMAL PERFORMANCE or emplosive detectors and other equipment used to The rato of the desgn gross heat rate (corrected) to the search for contraband. This also includes incidents adjusted actual gross heat rate, empressed as a percent.

avhere the search equipment is found defect!ve or did not age.

functon property dunng testing.

7) Door Hardware Fadures Failure of the door a! arm TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS and door hardware such as latches, electre str6kes. The total number and department breakdown of training doorknobs, locks, etc. anstructon hours administered by the Training Center.

8) Card Reader Fadures Incidents caused by mechann cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING the Card readers. (See Access Control and Authoriza- The total number of student hours of training for Opera-ton). This indcator tracks security pedormance for SEP tions Maintenance, Chemistry / Radiation Protecton, a58. Technical Support, General Empbyeo Training, and Other Traming conducted for FCS SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS dunng TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS the reporting perod. Repciable skin and clothing contamination $ above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm STAFFING LEVEL squared. This indcator trends personnel periormance for The actual staffing level and the authorized staffing level SEP a15 & 54.

for the Nuclear Operatons Divison, the Producton Engi-noenng Drvision, and the Nuclear Seryces Dmson. This UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR andcator tracks performance for SEP #24. The rato of the available energy generation over a giveri time penod to the reference energy generaton over the STAT 10N NET GENERATION same time perod, expressed as a percentage.

The not generaton (tum) produced by the FCS during the reporting month. UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL STOCKOUT RATE This indicator is defined as the number of ur'6lanned u-The total number of Pck Tckets tnat were generated tomate scrams (reactor protecton system 'r" ~ .,a-dunng the reporting month and the total number of Pck tions) that occur while the reactor is entiv $ ne indcator Tickets that were generated during the reporting month is f urther defmed as follows:

when the amount of parts requested is equal to or less 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a than the minimum stocking level and parts are not avad- planned test or evoluton.

able . 2) Scram means the automate shutouwn of the reactor 90

PERFORMANCE IllDICATOR DEFitilTIOtJS (Cont'd) by a rapid insemon of all control rods that is caused by VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACT1VE actuaton of the teactor protecton system The scram WASTE sgnal may have f esulted f rom etcGeding a setpoint or This indcator is defined as the Volume of bw level solid may have been spurcus. radcactive waste actually shipped for burial This andca-

3) Automate means that the initial sgnal that caused ac- tot also shows the volume of low level radcactive waste tuaton of the reactor protecton system logic was pro- wnch is in temporary storage. the amount of radonctwo vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param* oilthat has been shipped off site for processing, and the eters and concitons, rather than the manual scram volume of sohd dry f adcaciive wante whch has been switches (or pushbuttons) in the ma#n control room shipped 00stte for processing Low level sobd radcac-4)Critcal means that dunng the steady state conditon of t,ve easte consists of dry active waste, sludges, resir's, the teactor pror to the scram, the effective multipbcat on and evaporator tottoms generated as a result of nuc!sar f actor (k,)

• as equal to one- power plant operation and maintenance Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, UNPLANNED CAPABluTY LOSS FACTOR dispossbie protecttve ekstning, plastic containers, and The f ato of the unplanned energy losses during a given any other mater 41to be disposed of at a low level radio-period of time, to the reference energy genef aton, ex- active waste disposal Sfte, encept resin. Sludge, of pressed as a pottentage evaporator bottoms. Low level refers to all radioactive

• aste that is not spent f uel of a by product of spent fuel UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS

• processing. This indicator tracks radiological work periot-(INPO DEFINITION) mance for SEP frS4 This endicator is defined as the sum of the folbwing safety system actuations:

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuatons that result from reaching an ECCS actuaton setpoint or f rom a spurcus6nadvertent ECCS Sgnal.

2)The number o, unplanned emergency AC power sys-tem actuatons that result from a loss of power to a safe-guatds bus An unplanned safety system actuaton oc-curs when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a sputous of inadvertent sgnal is gen-erated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unp!anned means that the system actuaton was not part of a planned test or evoluton. The ECCS ac1uatons to be counted are actuations of the high pres-sure injecton system, the now pressure injecton system, of the safety injecton tanks.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (NRC DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuatons which include (d) the Hgh Pressure Safety injecton System, the Low Pressure Safety injecton System, the Saf ety injec-ton Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators The NRC classifcaton of satsty system actuatons includes actuatons when major equipment is operated AM when the loge systems for the above safety systems are chab lenged.

VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECT 10N HOURS This indcator is defined as the number of volatons sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspac-ton hours The volatons are reported in the year that the inspect on was actually performed and not based on when the inspecton report is received. The hours re.

ported for each inspecton report are used as the inspec-tion hours, 91

~

I l

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indcators index is to itst pertor, mance indcators related to SEP stems with parameters that can be trended SEP Reference Number 15 Eggg increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Periormance Indcators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . .32 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminatens . M Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate . .69 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . . .70 CARS issued vs Signitcant CARS issued vs NRC Violatons issueo vs LERs Reponed . .84 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated. improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR $ Issued vs Signifcant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reponed . .84 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional inspectons CARS issued vs Signifcant CARS issued vs NRC Velatens issued vs LERs Repor1ed . . 84 SEP Reference Number 23 Complete Staff Studies Statting Level . . . . .. . .

.72 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Gecordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . . .. .. ... . . . 09 SEP Reference Number 28 Evaluate and implement Statbn Standards for Safe Work Practee Requirements Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate . . . . . . .17 Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate . . 69 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training Emergent MWO Planning Status . . .. . 78 SEP Reference Number 13 Develop On Line Maintenance and Modifcation Schedule Percent of Cortpleted Scheduled Maintenance Actmties (Electncal Malntenance) ......... ... . .. . . . . . . 34 (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . .. . . 35 (General Maintenance)... .. . . . .. . . .. . . 36 (Mechanical Maintenarce) . . . 37 (instrumentation & Control) . . . . 38 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Correctrve Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). . 26 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) . . . 27 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . ~2B Preventrve Maintenance items Overdue . 29 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . 32 92

SEP Ref erence NumbnLO Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Vaive Failure Rate. 43 SEP Ref erence Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . 32 SEP Reference NumbcLAS Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . 21 SEP Ref erence Number E2 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices i

Radiological Work Practices Program. 52 Ericterence Number 53 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective 1 Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) . 15 Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste. 16 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations = .50 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . 51 SEP ReferenegRumber $8 Revise Physical Seconty Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Secunty) . ~56 Secunty Non System f ailures. .57 Secunty System Failures . SB SEP Reference Number EQ improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Numbar of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in L6censee Event Reports. .39 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. 39 SEP Reference Number 02 Establish interim System Engineers lemporaqr Modifications . _65 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown. . 66 Engineenng Change Notice Status . . 67 Engineenng Change Notice Breakdown . . 68 SEP Reference Number C,8 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training . 73 License Candidate Exams. . 74 SEP Ref erenr3 Number 71 improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . . 65 93

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST R. L. Andrews K. B. Gullani W. W. Ort G. L Anglehart R. Gundal L L Parent W. R. Bateman . H. Guy T. L Patterson K. L. Delek R. M. Hawkins R. L. Phelps A. D. Bl'au M. C. Hendrickson W.J.Ponec R. R. Henning Y. M. R:,;sdorff B. H. Biome C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry A. W. Richard J.P.Bobba J. B. Herman D. G. Ried C. E. Doughter G. J. Hill G. K. Samide M. A. Breuer K. C. Hotthaus T.J.Sandene C. J. Brunnert M. A. Howman B. A. Schmidt M. W. Butt L G. Huliska S. T. SchmMz C. A. Carlson C.J. Husk F. C. Scoticid J. W. Chase R. L. Jaworski L G Sealock G. R. Chatfield R. A. Johansen H. J. Sehek A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones D. K. Sentel A. J. Clark J. D. Kecy J. W. Shannon O. J. Clayton J. D. Keppler R. W. Short R. P. Clemens D. D Kloock C. F. Simtrons J. L. Connolley J. C. Knight E.L.Skaggs G M. Cook D. M. Kobunski J. L Skiles M. R. Core G. J. Krause F. K. Smith S. R. Crites L. J. Knpal R. L Sorenson D. W. Dale J. G. Krist J. A. Spilker R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr K. E. Steele R. D. DeYoung L T. Kusek W. Steele D. C. Dietz L E. Labs H. F. Sterba J. A. Drahota M. P. Lazar G. A. Teeple T. R. Dukarski R. C. Learch M. A. Tesar P. D. Dunham S.E. Lee T. G. Thorkildsen R. G. Eurich R. E. Lewis J. W. Tills H. J. Faulhabs. R. C. Liebentritt D. R. Trausch M= A. Ferdig C. J. Linden P. R. Tumer V. H. Frahm B. R. Livingston J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco J. H. MarAinron C.F.Vanecek M. T. Frans G D.rAamoran J. M. Waszak H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil G. R. Williams J. F. W. Friedrichsen N. L. Mathce S. J. Willrett S. K. Gambhir D. J. Matthews W. C. Woerner J. K. Gasper J. M. Mattice W. G. Gates T. J. Mcivor M. O. Gautier K. S. McCormick S. W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey J. M. Glantz K. J. Morris J.T Gleason D. C. Mueller L V. Goldberg R. J. Mueller D. J. Golden J. B. Newhouse D. C, Gorence M W. Nichols R. E. Gray C. W. Norris M. J. Guinn J. T. O'Connor G. E, Guliani 94

POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT The Positive Trend Report hghlights several Perfor- This secton lists the indcators whch show inadequacies mance indcators with data representing continued per- as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators whch formance atove the stated goal and indicators with data show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper representing $gnthcant improvement in recent months- quartae. The indcators will be compared to the industry rnedian or upper quartile as re:05 s it to that indicator.

The following indicators have been selected as ethitxting positwo trends:

• EI Mhna laturv1!!aets Freesenev Rate The FRI value for the reporting month (3 03)is atove the he ling injury /litness Frequency Rate for the

"" #8

month is zero bouid Rad!crsve Waste Be'na D scha'ced to the Env!-

• * " " 'O D (Page 29) 7,,,",~,,

" ent The percentage of maintenance items overdue for the The 991 total for I<ivid radcactive waste being dis- #D9 9#'

@ N*

Charged to the environment was well below the Fort Cal-houn goal.

Namber er Ou'of. Serv!ce Cont'21 Hoem Instrume's (Page 30)

End of Positive Trend Report The number of out-of service control room instruments for the toporting month (24)is above the 1992 Fort Cal-houn goal of 13.

ADVERSE TREND REPORT b"'d a'v S v't ** C h" t'v (Page 44)

The secondary syster chemistry CPIvalve for the re-A Performance indcator which has data representing three (3) consecutive months of declining performance g m nm F , is a N Camoun goal d constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report '

explains the conditons under which certain indicators are

, g showing adverse trends. An sxplanaten will be provided for indicators wnh riata representing three months of de- I*

clining performance that have been labeled as adverse trends. FM The following indicators are exhibrting adverse trends for a oun goal of 5.

the reporting month: q g g ,

Environment (Page 54)

Ace of Detitandtna Maintenance Work O' den (Page 25) The 1991 totalior gaseous radoactrve waste being dis-charged to the environment is above the Fort Calhoun The number of MWOs 3 6 months old and the number of MWOs 912 months old has increased for three consecu- 90" Amount of Work on Hold Awasno Parts Montenance Work Order Brockdown (Corromve Non. (Page 59) g, g, The amount of work on hold ewaning parts for the report.

(Page 26) ing month (3 9%)is above the Fort Calhoun goal of The number of Open MWOs >3 months old and the num-ber of Open Safety Related MWOs >3 months old has increased for three consecutive months.

Corremve Maintenanegf arkba Greater Than Three For the reporting month, the percentage of pek tckets Months Oki (Non-Outace) generated when the amount of parts requested is equal Pye2D to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are The nonautage corrective maintenance backlog greater not available is above the Fort Calhoun goal of 2%

than three months old has increased for three consecu-tive months.

End of Adverse Trend Report.

95 1

ii

Temocraw Mod 6catens (Page 65)

The age of temporary rMcatons for the it; Ming month exceeds the Fort Oaltoun Goat.

Recordable infurv'1Haess Cases Frecuenev Rate (Page 69)

The recordab!e injury /iliness cases frequency rate for the reporting month (2.37)is atove the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.0.

End of Management Attenton Report.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES The fonowing INPO Indcators have been added to the report:

Thermal Pedermance (Page 10)

Uno!anned CacabiMy Less Factor (Page 13)

Safety Syttem Pedermanc,g Hich Prgssure Safety it iedton System (page 6)

Auri!'ary Feedwater Syttem (page 7)

Emeroency AC Power Svugn1(page 8)

Industry Median Values. as provided by INPO, have been added where appropnate.

Eeeurnv Indicators The 1992 Securny Performance indcators have been moddied based upon a continuing analysis of the loggable/ reportable securny incdonts. Categones such as LDVs, Security Key Control, and Card Readers have been deleted due to a consistent downward trend in these areas. Indicators which have been added are Security Force Errors,1991 versus 1992 Security System Failures, and Unsecured Doors. The additon and deletion of the above categories will assist in our efforts to establish a consistent reporting crneria for the Securny Services Department.

LER Root Ceuse Breakdown (Page 71)

This indicator has been added to the report.

The following Refuehng Outage indcators have been deleted because the outage has begun:

MWO Plannino Status Proarets of Cvete 14 Outaae Modkaten Planaina Overay Proied Status I

l End of indcator Improvement' Changes Report.

96

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWHI Cycle 1 09/2693 02/01D5 3.299,639 3.299,639 1st Refuehng 02/01n5 05/0905 *

• Cycle 2 05/09D5 10/0106 3,853,322 7.152,961 2nd Refueling 10/0106 12/13/76 *

• Cycle 3 12/1396 09/30/77 2,805.927 0,958,888 3rd Refuehng 09/3097 12/0907 *

• Cycle 4 12/0907 10/1498 3.026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14D8 12/24D8 *

• Cycle 5 12/249 8 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Sth Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 *

• Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refuehng 09/18/81 12/21/81 *

• Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330.034 7th Refueling

• 12/06/82 04/07/83

• Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736.405 8th Refuehng 03/03/84 07/12/84 *

• Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 *

• Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refuelino 03/07/87 06/0E'87 *

• Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 lith Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 *

• Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589.459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90 *

• Cycle 13* 05/29/90- 02/01/92 # Planned Dates

• 13th Refueling

• 02/01/92 05/01/92 *

• Cycle 14* 05/01/92- 09/18/93 *

• 14th Refuehno 09/18/93 11/13/93 *

• Cycle 15* 11/13/93 03/11/95 *

• 15th Refueling

• 03/11/95 05/06/95 *

• FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

• RECORDS' First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supphed to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June B,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)tCycle 111 June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988

.