ML20087N527

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept Re Pipe Matl Supplied by Guyon Alloys. Sharon Tube Performed Mechanical Tests as Required by SA-106 But Did Not Affect Matl Properties.Reportability Not Met & Item Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e)
ML20087N527
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point 
Issue date: 03/14/1984
From: Mangan C
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NMP2L-003, NMP2L-3, NUDOCS 8404030543
Download: ML20087N527 (2)


Text

.

Y NIAGARA NUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST. SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 March 14, 1984 (NMP2L 003)

Mr. R. W. Starostecki, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Division of Project and Resident Programs 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Starostecki:

Enclosed is a final report in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) for the

problem concerning pipe material supplied by Guyon Alloys (55(e)-84-08). This problem was reported via telecon to S. Collins of your staff on February 13,

-1984.

Very truly yours, Vice President

~

~

Nuclear Engineering & Licensing

CVM/TL:ja-Enclosure xc:-Director of Inspection and Enforcement

-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-PDR h

~

6 age

=

w..

@-[

T'.

~

NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER' C0iP0 RATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET N0. 50-410 Final _ Report for a Problem

. Concerning. Pipe Material Supplied By Guyon Alloys (55(e).- 84-08)

' Description of-the: Problem'

,The problem pertains to certain items of ASME pipe material supplied by Guyon L Alloys, Incorporated, under. Field Purchase Order No. NMP2-FP0-12345.

Guyon

Alloys had ' purchased _.this: material from Sharon Tube Company, Sharon, Pennsylvania.

Guyon ; informed Stone &; Webster. Engineering Corporation that

'during an. audit of-the.Sharon Tube quality program, it was discovered that <

under strict-interpretation of;ASME-Section III rules, certain items of SA&l05 EGrade 'B pipe were not actually manufactured by'Sharon Tube although so

-indicated-by. Certified Material' Test Reports pro.vided by Sharon Tube to~ Guyon s

Alloys, Incorporated.

f

~

iSharon Tube: furnished to Guyon Alloys certain items of hot-finished or rolled

..pipecl ' inch NPSf through ~1-1/2' inch NPS which, according to Guyon Alloys; _'were a

manufactured by U.S. Steel at' Gary, _ Indiana, under its qualified NCA-3800' E
quality program.to. the chemical,' finish and dimensional requirements -only of
A-106.. Upon receipt, Sharon; Tube performed.mechinical' tests as required by :

iSA-106 '(i.e., : tensile, bend -and' hydrostatic)/trinned or faced ends and fapplied final coating'and markings but' did not affect the ' material

properties.

Sharon-Tube: issued and supplied Certified Material Test--Reports r to; Guyon Alloys,' Incorporated which certify that the pipe was produced in accordance with its : qualified quality program. : These~ Certified Material Test-'

Reports incorporated the results of tha Sharon Tub'e mechanical tests"alo,ng s

. ith the chemical' analysis results from U.S. Steel. Certified Material Test w

1 Reports (showing conformance to, ASTM A-106).

g

ra._

.i Analysis :of -Safety Implicati6ns :

~

r n

'Upon;receiptiof the subje'dt matref al, Sharon Tube performed mechanical tests' s!

e

'as_ required bylSA-_106, trimmedlo7 faced. ends and applied final coatings and markings;but didinot. affect material properties. Sharon Tube should.have

~

Ycertified this9iaterial f only :inj the' capacity of _a. supplier of ASME material,

n I
ratheri thanlin.the capacity _ of"a manufacturer.. HoweveF, as indicaYed by Guyon

' Alloys, the. material. was manufactured by U.S. Steel un' der a qualified :NCA-3800 tquality' program and was: certified to' conform to _ ASTM A-106., Therefore, we are lof the opinion that this'is not a significant quality breakdown and that 1( "

fthis'problemtwere.to-have. remained 6ncorrected, it would not have adversely

'affected theisafe~ operation:of the: plant.-'Hence, the criteria,for

'~

ireportability under 10CFR50.55(e) have not been met.

' ~

W r

[

w

  1. /
h +

-f

?

y

+4 j

3 9re-9--y wg'-

p+

-pygy-y 9-w, y

  • -M g - '