ML20087N527

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept Re Pipe Matl Supplied by Guyon Alloys. Sharon Tube Performed Mechanical Tests as Required by SA-106 But Did Not Affect Matl Properties.Reportability Not Met & Item Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55(e)
ML20087N527
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/1984
From: Mangan C
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NMP2L-003, NMP2L-3, NUDOCS 8404030543
Download: ML20087N527 (2)


Text

.

Y NIAGARA NUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST. SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 March 14, 1984 (NMP2L 003) .'

Mr. R. W. Starostecki, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Division of Project and Resident Programs 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Starostecki:

Enclosed is a final report in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) for the

problem concerning pipe material supplied by Guyon Alloys (55(e)-84-08). This problem was reported via telecon to S. Collins of your staff on February 13,

-1984.

Very truly yours, Vice President

~

~

Nuclear Engineering & Licensing

CVM/TL:ja-Enclosure xc:-Director of Inspection and Enforcement

-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-PDR h

=

~

6 age

, w . . ,

@-[ ,

-, T'.

~

NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER' C0iP0 RATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET N0. 50-410 Final _ Report for a Problem

. Concerning. Pipe Material Supplied By Guyon Alloys (55(e).- 84-08)

- , ' Description of-the: Problem'

,The problem pertains to certain items of ASME pipe material supplied by Guyon L Alloys, Incorporated, under. Field Purchase Order No. NMP2-FP0-12345. Guyon

Alloys had ' purchased _.this: material from Sharon Tube Company, Sharon, Pennsylvania. Guyon ; informed Stone &; Webster. Engineering Corporation that

'during an . audit of- the .Sharon Tube quality program, it was discovered that <

under strict-interpretation of;ASME-Section III rules, certain items of SA&l05 EGrade 'B pipe were not actually manufactured by'Sharon Tube although so s -indicated- by. Certified Material' Test Reports pro.vided by Sharon Tube to~ Guyon .

Alloys, Incorporated. -

f

~ - -

iSharon Tube: furnished to Guyon Alloys certain items of hot-finished or rolled -

a ..pipecl ' inch NPSf through ~1-1/2' inch NPS which, according to Guyon Alloys; _'were .

manufactured by U.S. Steel at' Gary, _ Indiana, under its qualified NCA-3800' E <  ; quality program .to. the chemical,' finish and dimensional requirements -only of "
A-106. . Upon receipt, Sharon; Tube performed.mechinical' tests as required by :

iSA-106 '(i.e., : tensile, bend -and' hydrostatic)/trinned or faced ends and '

fapplied final coating'and markings but' did not affect the ' material

properties. Sharon- Tube
issued and supplied Certified Material Test--Reports r to; Guyon Alloys,' Incorporated which certify that the pipe was produced in

. accordance with its : qualified quality program. : These~ Certified Material Test-'

Reports incorporated the results of tha Sharon Tub'e mechanical tests"alo,ng s

.with the chemical' analysis results from U.S. Steel. Certified Material Test g 1 Reports (showing conformance to , ASTM A-106). -

ra._ .i Analysis
of -Safety Implicati6ns :

~

r

- , . n

'Upon;receiptiof the subje'dt matref al, Sharon Tube performed mechanical tests' s!

e 'as_ required bylSA-_106, trimmedlo7 faced . ends and applied final coatings and

markings;but didinot. affect material properties. Sharon Tube should.have

~

n Ycertified this9iaterial f only :inj the' capacity of _a. supplier of ASME material, I
ratheri thanlin.the capacity _ of"a manufacturer. . HoweveF, as indicaYed by Guyon

' Alloys, the. material. was manufactured by U.S. Steel un' der a qualified :NCA-3800

.. tquality' program and was: certified to' conform to _ ASTM A-106. , Therefore, we are .

'. lof the opinion that this'is not a significant quality breakdown and that 1( "

,. fthis'problemtwere.to-have. remained 6ncorrected, it would not have adversely *

'affected theisafe~ operation:of the: plant.-'Hence, the criteria,for '~

ireportability under 10CFR50.55(e) have not been met. - ,,

' ~

, W . ;. .

r

, [ w *

  1. /
h + -f ,.

? y $ +4 j 3 9re-9--y wg'- p+ -

-pygy- y 9-w, y *-M g - '