ML20087G328
| ML20087G328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1995 |
| From: | Opeka J NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO., NORTHEAST UTILITIES |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087G331 | List: |
| References | |
| B15135, NUDOCS 9504040145 | |
| Download: ML20087G328 (3) | |
Text
9.;
W
'Do
- ?
s NNd.
107 Sdden Street, Berlin; CT 06037 -
Utilities System -
Northeast Utilities Service Company.
P.O. Box 270 -
- Ilartford, CT 06141-0270 (203) 665-5000.
March 27,'1995 i
Docket No. 850-336 B15135 Re:
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Document control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 2 Proposed Revision to Technical Specification Feedwater Isolation Introduction 1994,U3 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company By letter dated May 6, submitted an amendment request.to the NRC Staff which would (NNECO)
The revise the technical specifications of Millstone Unit No. 2.
proposed changes would revise Technical Specification - Sections 3/4.7.1 and 3/4.8.2, and Bases Sections.3/4.3.1 and 3/4.3.2,.
3/4.7.1, and 3/4.8.
These changes were proposed to comply with 2>
and the commitments made in License Event Report 94-003-00:
inspection report for Millstone combined Inspection-50-245/94-01, 50-336/94-01, and 50-423/94-01."3 il nemerintion of Pronomaa chameras In the proposed revision to technical specifications letter, among other changes, it was proposed that Limiting Condition for F. Opeka letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (1)
J.
" Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No.
2, Proposed L
Revision to Technical Specifications, Feedwater Isolation,"
dated May 6, 1994.
B.
Miller, Jr. letter to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory I
(2)
D.
Commission, " Facility Operating License No. DPR-65, Docket No.
l 50-336, Licensee Event Report 94-003-00," dated March 18, l'
- 1994, i
i (3)
W.
D.
Lanning letter to J.
F.
Opeka, " Millstone Combined Inspection. 50-245/94-01; 50-336/94-01; 50-423/94-01," dated i
April 22, 1994.
9504040145 950327
% g',*
PDR ADOCK 05000336 I
,.P PDR g
4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission B15135/Page 2 March 27, 1995 Operation (LCO) 3.8.2.1A, for Inverters 5 and 6, and LCO 3.8.2.5, for the Turbine Battery, be added to the technical specifications with associated surveillance requirements.
During the NRC Staff's review of the proposed license amendment request, the Staff requested certain changes to these two LCOs to clarify the Actions and Surveillance Requirements, add a
periodic Surveillance Requirement, and make the LCOs more consistent with NUREG-1432 Standard Technical Specifications (STS).
Specifically, the Action Statement previously proposed for LCO 3.8.2.1A has been separated into three distinct actions.
The associated proposed surveillance requirements have also been modified by incorporation of terminology from the STS, and the addition of a requirement to periodically test the automatic transfer.
The proposed addition of LCO 3.8.2.5 has been revised to incorporate terminology from the
- STS, and to specify plant identification numbers in the surveillance requirements.
The purpose of this letter is to provide revised technical specification pages which address the Staff's comments.
Two pages of those transmitted via our May 6, 1994, letter, have been revised to reflect the above discussion and are included herein.
Attachments 1 and 2 contain the revised marked-up and retyped pages, respectively, and are intended to replace the comparable pages previously transmitted.
safety masas===nt and siernifinant nasards consideration NNECO has reviewed these changes with respect to the Safety Assessment and Significant Hazards Consideration submitted in our y 6, 1994, letter.
NNECO has determined that these sections are unaffected by these changes, and that they remain valid and applicable to this revised submittal.
Environmental Considerations NNECO has reviewed these changes with respect to the Environmental Considerations submitted in our May 6, 1994, letter.
NNECO has concluded that this section is unaffected by these changes, and that it remains valid and applicable to this revised submittal.
Muelame safety assaamment Board naview The Millstone Nuclear Safety Assessment Board Chair has reviewed these proposed changes and has concurred with the above determinations.
Pronomad schedule for Licanne 1=andment Issuance As indicated in our May 6, 1994, this amendment is not necessary b
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission B15135/Page 3 March 27, 1995 l
for plant operatien.
As such, no specific schedule for approval and issuance is requested.
We do, however, wish to modify the proposed implementation period previously requested.
We request that the changes be effective upon issuance, with implementation within 90 days to permit procedure changes and training to be performed after startup from the current refueling outage.
We believe the above information, coupled with the information provided in the referenced letter, provides a complete basis for approval of the requested amendment.
We appreciate your efforts in support of this request, and should the Staff have any additional questions or comments, please contact Mr. R. S. Peterson at (203) 440-2074.
Very truly yours, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY 1Yw J. F J peka (J Executive Vice President cc:
T. T. Martin, Region I Administrator G.
S. Vissing, NRC Project Manager, Millstone Unit No. 2 P. D.
Swetland, Senior Resident Inspector, Millstone Unit Nos.
1, 2,
and 3 i
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 0 7M day of MarrI 1995 Sp1m) f as ?A2+1 n&
Date Commission Expires:
/M /3/!77 i
.