ML20085M545
| ML20085M545 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 11/11/1991 |
| From: | ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-1437 AR, S, NUDOCS 9111110160 | |
| Download: ML20085M545 (208) | |
Text
AQUATIC RESOURCES D
ATTACHMENTS
- we";;,
1437 C
s... . . g i
O o UTILITY % oc(esb( cs N k ! c c b. c .
SITE (-isnc.
ENCLOSURES O w s to e ( s -kD rn Les b.m 3 - (Ja,4 /
~ Anne hh<pnh i nuoML hasp 9 rrF5 ~ 4 (? a a f & g n + 0 6 -i 3 - T 3 /, i 8 0 2 4, q, i4 2 oq 2- /
- 1 b " 03 Y b 2 3 0 Oo h o s R r T . s o 3 o nd 31(el o) o) 5ot a e>c onorn i c Que3Wo-O O
- r. , , . , ,. , - - - ,c.., .-,,-,~w- , - - - - - - - r --- - - , - = - - ---.e . . - , - - - - - -v.,- -
B ERPORS E_TILRUMARC_Q U E D TIONNAI RE RhSTE HAH 6GEMENI SPENT TUEL A.1 The current technique for at-reactor storage at RG&E is re-racking of spent fuel. The pool has been re-racked for maximum storage. Each location is denigned to hold consolidated fuel. A.2 RG&E plans on using current techniques of re-racking and fuel consolidation for at-reactor storage until the end of its operating licensing renewal period. A.3 RG&E anticipates using re sacking and fuel consolidation for at-reactor storage until off-site erant luel storage becomes available. A.4 Re-racking and fuel consolidation techniques will not be adequate for operating lifetime plus 20 years. Re-racking will be adequato until 1999. Consolidation will bo
- necessary to obtain end of operating lifetime storage.
Plans have not been formulated for plus 20 years. O A.5 RG&E does not anticipate the need to acquire additional land for storage of spent-fuel. 1 A.6 RG&E does anticipate additional construction activity associated with continued at-reactor storage of spent fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant. A.7 Construction will be necessary if off-site storage is not available. Possible options are dry storage facility or i Ldditional fuel storage pool. LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ( ! D.1 RG&E is closely monitoring the progress of New York Stato in meeting the requirements of the 1985 LLWPAA. Governor Cuomo certified in December 1989, that New York intends to meet its obligations under federal law for catablishing a permanent disposal facility for LulW generated in the state. Due to economics of scale and other political factors it is conceivable that New York-could enter-into some alternative agreement with another state or contract for out of state disposal. Contingencies for interim on-site storage are being investigated. B.2 If RG&E is denied access to a licensed disposal site for a short period of time we will consider shipment to either of () the two other permanent waste disposal facilities, i f access is available. Arrangements are in place for off-site volume n a ~ - - e a , m ,m -- v omne--m,-m---e,- w w - s--- - +--e,- s-n--~ v. w- , - - - _ , reduction services. Contingencies for interim on-site a storage capacity is estimated to be approximately two years. W B.3 Specific methods and percentages of LLRW currently utilized by RG&E. a . M.tR_C.9EDAtt19D : Both on-site and off-site waste compaction facilities are available for dry solid wastes. Over the last two years, approximately 78% of Ginna's total LLRW (pre-compaction) volume has been processed by compaction.
- b. h .te_flgn mLtiRD: No estimates are available, however, controls are implemented at Ginna to caation workers about unnossarily bringing paper, plastic and other packaging materials into contaminated areas of the plant. Also, receptacles are provided in controlled areas for placement of " clean" trash, which is later monitored and verified to be free of contamination. j
- c. ng29ntamination: Approximately 9% of Ginna's total pre-compacted LLRW volume is decontaminated by ultra-sonic cleaning, gritblasting, use of other liquid decontamination agents, and wood-planing.
- d. Waste Sorting: There is no formal waste sorting program of contaminated trash, other than the monitoring of " clean" trash described above.
gi
- e. Qthrr:
Incineration: Approximately 10% of the pre-compacted LLRW volume is incinerated by SEG's facility in Tennessee. Resin Dewatering: About 1% of the pre-compacted volume consists of dowatered liquid waste processing and primary resins. Filters: About 1% of the pre-compacted volume consists of liquid waste processing and primary clean-up filters. Solidified evaporator bottoms: About 2% of the pre-compacted volume consists of solidified evaporator bottoms. I D.4 In anticipation for LLWR management, RG&E is fornulating long term plans for radwaste processing and volume reduction system upgrades. This matter is being investigated and a comprehensive set of recommendations is expected by the early part of 1991. l D.5 There are no plans to acquire additional land for LLRW storage. lh l i B.6 li/A B.7 11o specific construction designs or studies have been performed, as of this time, for temporary LLRW storage. Should additional interim storage capacity be required, it is expected that such construction would be on-site (i.e., inside the plant security fence). B.8 llo specific plans or details have been developed at this time. B.9 Two potential activities which may effect LLRW volumes include partial or full primary system decontamination and steam generator replacement, if required. O O 1 l AOUATIC RESOURCES
- 1. There have been no significant structural modifications made to the cooling water intake or discharge systems during the post-licensing period which would have altered the effect of the plant on aquatic resources. Further, no mitigative measures have been imposed by regulatory agencies upon operations to reduce impacts upon aquatic resources.
Two operational changes which may result in some reduction of impact upon aquatic resources concern the annual shutdown for refueling and maintenance. At the time of license issuance the plant was routinely taken off-line for scheduled shutdowns over a three hour period. Currently this timespan for shutdown in spread over an eight hour period, thus reducing the rate of change of discharge temperature decline and providing a greater adjustment period for fish against the possibility of cold-shock. Secondly, during the annual shutdown, one or both circulating cooling water pumps are normally taken out of service. thus reducing impingement and entrainment during these periods. Actual reductions in impacts to aquatic resources due to either of these actions are assumed to have been slight and have never been quantified.
- 2. There have been no negative impacts upon aquatic resources, including fish kills, that have ever been attributed to the operation of the Ginna Nuclear Power Station. Exceptions to N/SPDES permit conditions, including enforcement actions, are summarized below. No impacts upon the aquatic resources have ever been associatea with these exceptions. No SPDES enforcement actions are currently on-going.
During the 1975-1985 permit period only minor permit excursions occurred which were recorted on the manthly Data Monitoring Reports, as required. No detailed information on these excursions are currently available. During the current permit term (1985 to present) few permit exceptions occurred. These are summarized in the following discussion. In March of 1986, Discharge 002A experienced the first of six pH exceptions which ceased in Septeuber of 1987. A second retention tank was installed in May of 1988 and no pH exceptions have occurred for the past two years. During the past five years, two sporadic total suspended solid exceptions also were experienced at Discharge 002A. Discharge 001B experienced two TSS exceptions in January and April of 1988. A one-time exception for pH carly in this permit term (3/86) also was experienced at Discharge 001B. During this permit term three sporadic chlorination exceptions occurred at Discharge 001. A one-time oil and grease exception occurred at Discharge 001C (1/87). There llh is no reason to believe that a probability of reoccurrence \ l 9 for a TSG, pH, chlorine, and/or oil and grease exception at O any of the above-referenced discharges exists.
- 3. The first NPDES Permit for Ginna was issued by the USEPA, covering the period 1975-1980. During the renewal of that permit, the EPA transferred the NPDES Program to NYS, where it was administered by the Department of Environmental Conservation. The renewal of the first permit subsequently took five years and the second permit (a SPDES Permit) covered the 1985-1990 period. This permit is currently in )
i the renewal process. The following discussion summarizes significant changes betweer the first and second permits, l which are referred to as th 1975 permit and the 1985 permit, respectively. The 1975 permit identified only one dischargo, 001, ! since this discharge is the singic of fluent source to Lake Ontario. Parameters to be monitored consisted of flow, temperature, delta T, BTU output, free available chlorine, pH, and oil / grease. The 1985 permit identified each of the plant systems which discharged into 001 as separate discharges, thus the number of permitted outfalls expanded to seven. In addition the State identified three stormwater ; discharges as permitted outfalls. The 1985 001 discharge parameters consisted of flow, temperatare, delta T, total residual chlorine, pH, copper, zinc and boron. There are also Action Level Requirements for 001 for iron, lead, and - O' _ mercury. The other six discharges, combined, required monitoring for the following parameters flows, oil / grease, TSS, pH, boron, and surfactants. , Although the number of discharges and overall number of parameters to be monitored increased from 1975 to 1985, this 1 is due to the State's requirements to maintain water quality standards and do not reflect new water quality-concerns raised as a result of plant operations. This is supported by the aquatic monitoring aspects of these two permits. In the 1975 permit there were requirements to perform intake evaluations including entrainment and impingement studies and investigations on alternate intake designs. Concerning the thermal discharge, the 1975 permit required that the 316(a) Demonstration supplement be prepared, and that tri-axial temperature surveys be- performed during eight months of each year. The 1985 permit however, stated that the 316(a) and (b) demonstrations were approved, and that the only continuing aquatic monitoring would be for impingement. Thus, no entrainment monitoring, nor lake studies for fish or other aquatic life were required. Also, the tri-axial - monitoring was deleted from the permit. The renewed permit, presently being drafted, is expected to be very similar to the 1985 permit in this regard and may further reduce the amount of biological-(i.e., impingement) sampling required. O 4. The effects of the Ginna Nuclear Power Station upon o , . aquatic resources were primarily analyzed in the Ginna 3 316(a) Demonstration Supplement, a copy of which is being W provided with these responses per Question 9. That document summarizes impacts based upon data collected between the years 1969 and 1975. The SPDES Permit issued in 1985, which is currently in the renewal process, stated that the 316(a) was approved. No further monitoring was required at that time, however, RG&E continued monitoring fish at the Ginna Site until 1983. A report entitled "1978 - 1983 Fish Program Summary Report, Ginna Nuclear Power Station (RG&E Report No. B-13-290)" is being provided with this response. None of the fish monitoring conducted by RG&E has identified any significant negative impacts upon the Lake Ontario fish populations as a result of the operation of the Ginna Plant. Major changes to the Lake fishery have occurred during this time frame however, as a result of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation'c Salmonid Stocking Program. This program, established in the mid-seventies, introduced pacific salmon on a "put-and-take" basis (i.e., dependent on annual stocking), and attempts to re-establish such once natural stocks as lake trout and atlantic salmon. The impact of this lakewide management program would greatly overshadow any subtle impacts that Ginna Station way have otherwise had. Impingement data has been collected at Ginna from 1973 through the present. Trends it.dicated from this data are discussed in response to Question 5. g Aside from water temperature information (which is included in the 316(a) Demonstration), no water quality data has been collected over the long term which would directly assist in indicat'.ng trends in effects upon the aquatic resources.
- 5. The following entrainment report summaries are provided with this response They summarize entrainment findings during the primarv period of entrainment assessments.
RG&E, 1978. 1977 Fish Egg and Larvae Program, Lake /Screenhouse Surveys, Ginna Nuclear Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13=058. RG&E, 1979. 1978 Ichthyoplankton Program, Lake /Screenhouse Surveys, Ginna Nuclear Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13-103. RG&E, 1985. 1977 - 1981 Entrainment Program Summary Report, Ginna Nuclear Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13-289. Impingement studies at Ginna Station have been conducted each year since 1973. Since 1981 impingement analyses have been performed annually, covering the previous l l five years of impingement collections. Impingement data and O analyses report summaries covering the entire period of impingement studies analyzed to date (1973 through 1988) are identified below and included with this response). It should be stressed that these data reflect Lake populations that have fluctuated greatly over this time period, especially alewives and smelt, as a result of the salmonid stocking program discussed in response to Question 4. Storr, J . F. , 1975. Impingement summary, Ginna Nuclear Power Station, 1973-1974. RG&E Report No. B-13-035. RG&E, 1977. Recommendations on the Future Operations of the R.E. Ginna Intake System with Respect to Entrapment and/or Fish Mortality. RG&E Report No. DE-13-042. RG&E, 1985. 1977-1981 Impingement Program Summary Report, Ginna Nuc1 car Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13-288. RG&E, 1987. Fish Impingement Program, 1982 through 1984 Analysis Report, Ginna Nuclear Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13-328. RG&E, 1989. Fish Impingement Program, 1984 through 1988 Analysis Report, Ginna Nuclear Power Station. RG&E Report No. B-13-331,
- 6. It is generally believed that the operation of the plant has enhanced the embayment area eastward of Smokey Pt.
by establishing a current pattern that prevents the substantial build-up, and subsequent rotting, of tbo filamentous algae, Cladonhorn. It is assumed that i action allows more available habitat for certain spovacs. The major impact upon habitat in the vicinity of Ginna is caused by the effects of the discharge, both thermal and flow effects. These impacts are fully discussed in the 316(a) Demonstration which is being provided in response to Question 9.
- 7. The NYSDEC strictly regulates commercial fishing in the U.S. waters of Lake Ontario to the extent that commercial fishang is not a factor with respect to the operation of Ginna.
There is no on-site access to the Lake from the Ginna Site, and the nearest boat launch is approximately 1.5 mi. to the east of the Ginna discharge. Therefore the () recreational use of the Lake near Ginna is limited to fishermen who choose to fish in that area from boats. The a operation of Ginna has established this location as a preferred fishing spot, depending upon the time of year and species desired, due to the establishment of localized environmental conditions that are conducted to inhabitation i by fish. This situatior, has not changed since the plant : began operation.
- 8. The Ginna Nuclear Power Station is situated on the l southern shore of Lake Ontario, a waterbody which is 7,340 mir in surface area and 393 m13 in volume. Cumulative impacts of all sources upon the Lake are not available, i however the impact of Ginna Station upon the Lake has been dotermined to be negligible as evidenced by the 316(a) and )
(b) determinations provided by NYSDEC. For example, the impingement of alewives and smelt has been estimated to average approximately 0.003%/yr of the Lake populations for these two species, while the average thermal discharge is estimated to cover a surface area of 176 acres. There are no other significant sources of impacts upon the Lake within close proximity of Ginna. Therefore, impacts upon water quality and aquatic biota due to the plant are limited to the small, localized impacts evaluated in 316(a) and (b) determinations, or need to be assessed on a lakewide basis using the minor lakewide impacts described above.
- 9. As indicated in response to Question 3, NYSDEC stated &
W in the 1985 SPDES Permit that RG&E's 316(a) and (b) Demonstrations were acceptable, and that only impingement monitoring would be continued. A copy of the Ginna 316(a) Demonstration Supplement (RG&E Report BP-13-043) is provided with these responses. RG&E believes that it is not necessary to supply the original Ginna 316(a) Demonstration with this response. The enclosed Ginna 316(a) Demonstration supplement was prepared following consultation and comment from USEPA and NYSDEC, whereas the original Ginna 316(a), prepared and filed in order to meet a permit deadline, did not have the benefit of such regulatory input. Therefore, the Ginna 316(a) Demonstration Supplement included with this response in the document evaluated and approved for thermal discharge impacts upon the aquatic resources. The 316(b) Demonstration consists of the impingement, entrainment and intake report summaries supplied in response to Question 5. O 6 SOCIOECON.QMIC OUESTIONS
- 1. In 1990 there are approximately 245 Ginna Station permanent staff on-site. Additional there are 93 RG&E employees, on-site, assigned to other departments and 192 contractors for a total of 530 permanently assigned workers.
2. Ginna Station Other HG&E Ratg Permarlent Staff Emnloyees on-Site 1970 64 12 (est.) 1975 99 15 1980 158 18 1985 217 19 All numbers are approximate. These figures do not include contractors assigned to the site which in 1990, had increased to 192 workers. This data was not available. 3.A The length of the typical planned outage is between 35 and 45 days occurring in March / April /May time frame every year. Our last typical outage was 1990. For outage costs see the attached bar charts for our best estimate of O&M and capital {} expenditures. Outaae staffina and dos.g , Additional Dose Workorg (Man-Rem) a) Entire Outage 500 282 b) Principal Tasks: Refueling- 15 26 Steam Generator 200 148 Modifications 100 32 preventative & Corrective Maint 100 60 Reactor Coolant Pump Motor 10 6.7 L.P. Turbine Overhaul 15 0 Main Transformer Overhaul 10 0 Valve Maintenance. 50 10
- See attached sheets for more specific information on activity man-hours and dose.
3.B The length of an ISI outage is between 45 and 75 days occurring in March / April /May time frame. Our last ISI outage was in 1989 (20 years). For outage costs see the attached bar charts for our best estimate of O&M and capital () expenditures. _ . . _ . . . . - - , . . - - . . _ . . , . ~ _ , _ . , _ _ . . _ Quinsc_ sin 111ng and done Additional Dose Workers. Dian-Pgn). a) Entire Outage 715 548 b) Principal Tasks Refueling 15 41 Steam Generator 200 221 ISI Inspection 30 71 Modificationr. 250 60 Preventative & Corrective Maint 100 100 Turbino Overhaul 20 0 Valvo Maintenanco 100 40
- Soc attached sheets for more specific information on activity man-hours and dose.
3.C Our longest single outage, in terms of manpower, was 1989.
- 4. TAXES State Town & School Total Assessment XAM C_quAty Tax- _In)L_ _la>L. IBo_unaed).
1980 952,188 2,201,229 3,153,417 130,000,000 1985 1,436,283 2,726,674 4,162,957 200,000,000 1989 1,721,572 2,628,267 4,349,83? 234,000,000 0 -A_s.w- Asaa-KsJ- =ue-*A--nA>=a*4 M AMm 6-&J440M*AAAmm es 6-- b MmMM-mea "MAA 3 h Ad 4 4Lvu 'mM.& -m& A A n--
- mink " 0 s MMAmamm.-.
O i AQUATIC RESOURCES O ATTACHMENTS 1 l l l i l O l l s. .I >'1 xa'= a=> oar "o O I I ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION FISH IMPINGEMENT PROGRAM 1984 THROUGH 1988 ANALYSIS REPORT O_ GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION i t Data Collected and Report Prepared by < Rochester Gas and -Electric Corporation . September, 1989 O . r . 1 1 1 i
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSICHS The following items summarize the major results and conclusions h discussed in Section III of this report.
- Commencing in 1986, the Ginna Huclear Power Station Impinge-ment Program became a requirement of the Ginna SPDES Permit.
Per the permit conditions an annual impingement report is required which includes analyses of total fish, alewife, smelt, yellow perch, and spottail shiner impingement at Ginna as well as an impact assessment for the first three of these species. In order to make such analysse more meaning-ful, four previous years of Ginna impingement data (in additi.on to the 1988 data) have been included in this report.
O
- The impact of fish impingement at Ginna Station upon lake populations of alewife, smelt and yellow perch has been concluded to be negligible. The average annual percentage of lake population impinged during the 1984 through 1988 adult alewife was 0.00295 and for juvenile period for alevite was 0.00296. The average annual percentage of lake population impinged during the 1984 through 1988 period for adult smalt was 0.00098 and for juvenile smelt was 0.00688.
Lake population size for yellow perch have not been quanti-fled, however the impingement of <100 adult yellow perch a year is considered to be have no measurable impact.
1 0
e*
1
- Total fish impingement at Ginna station during 1988 was projected to be 116,000 fish. This is nearly a three-fold increase from the five year low which occurred in 1987, yet l
it is not as high as the five year peak of 176,000 fish in 1985. This increase in 1988 over 1987 is mostly attributable to alewives. Biomass impinged in 1988 totaled 3,153 kg n the range of 865-3600kg during 1984 through 1988.
- For impingement of all species the following environmental conditions resulted in the highest Ampingement ratest wind speeds of >15 mphs wind direction from West; one pump operation; water temperatures <50 degrees F.
L l
A - Alewife impingement in 1988 was 94,000 fish. This is an k.
increase over the 18,000 impinged in 1987 and reverses the l annual declines seen since 1985. Juvenile alewife comprised nearly 14 percent of the 1988 alewife total. Total alewife i
biomass in 1988 was 2,730 kg, up from the 1987 total of 397 !
i kg. Adult alewives were also larger in 1988, weighing an average of 33.4 gn/ fish n 28.2 gn/ fish in 1987.
- Highest alewife impingement rates were found when wind speeds were >10 mph and winds were from the west. Most-impingement occurred during the lower intake velocities associated with one pump operation. Temperatures below 500F accounted for most adult alewife irepingement.
O 2
I l
- Smelt impingament in 1988 was about 17,500 fish, which was h similar to the number impinged during 1986 and 1987. Juvenile emelt normally account for 50-70 percent of the annual smelt impingement. Total smelt biomass in 1988 was 192 kg, just below the 203 kg estimated for 1987 and in the middle of the 88-315 range for 1984-1988. Average weight of adult smelt in 1988 increased to 19.3 gn/ fish continuing annual increases from the five year lov of 12.9 gn/ fish in 1986.
- Adult smelt inpingement peaked with winds speeds >15 mph and wind from the north. Impingement rate increases with one pump operation and most smelt are impinged in water temperatures of <50 0F.
G
- Yellow perch impingement was 45 fish in 1988, which the same level seen in 1987. Impingement of less than 100 yellow perch per year is normal, with the only exception being 1985 when 450 yellow perch were projected. Yellow perch biomass in 1988 accounted for 6.6 kg, the lowest of the five year period. The average weight of the adult yellow perch impinged in 1988 increased to 240 gm/ fish, up slightly from 235 gn/ fish in 1987.
- Yellow perch impingement was highest during vind speeds >15 mph and slightly higher with winds from the vest. Impingement 3
0
- - - _- =--
t i
was highest with one pump operation and most occurred when vatar temperatures were <50 07.
4
- Spottail shiner impingement was 1520 fish in 1988, which is ;
a slight increase from 1987 yet still well below the >4000 levels projected for 1984 - 1986. Most spottails are r
impinged when vind speeds are >15 mph, vind direction is :
from the west or north, one pump is in operation, and '
temperatures are <40 07. :
O :
P
'1 0 4 ,
e O
RG&E REPORT !!O. B-13-3 :
I O ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!!
PIS!! IMPIllGEME!!T PROGRAM
' 1982 THROUGH 1986 A11ALYSIS REPORT GIlillA NUCLEAR POWER STATIO11 2
Data Collected and Report Prepared by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation ,
July, 1987
i suyyJsRY OP RESULTS A!!D C0!!CLUSlolls The following itema summarize the major results and conclusions discussed in Section III of this report.
- Commencing in 1986, the Ginna liuclear Power Station Impinge-ment program became a requirement of the Ginna SPDES Permit.
Per the permit conditions an annual impingement report is required which includes analyses of alewife, smelt, yellow perch, spottall shiner, and total fish impingement at Ginna as well as an impact assessment for the first three of these i species. In order to make such analyses more meaningful, i
four previous years of Ginna impingement data (in addition to the 1986 data) have been included in this report. +
i
( -
The impact of fish impingement at Ginna Station upon lake populations of alewife, smelt and yellow perch has been concluded to be negligible. The maximum annual percentage of lake population impinged during the 1982 through 1986 period for adult alevife was 0.00310 and for total smelt was 0.00586. Lake population size for yellow perch have not been quantified, however the impingement of 100 adult yellow perch a year is considered to be have no measurable impact.
Alevife impingement in 1986 was 40,000 fish. The 1982 through 1986 range was 28,000-113,00 fish. The 1986 numbers were a subetantial decrease from tho 1985 results, and showed a 1
return to the pre-1983 numbers. Juvenile alewife comprised I
(} nearly 20 percent of the 1986 alewife total. Total alewife biomass in 1986 was 1100 kg ya the 1982-1986 range of 804-2900 kg. The average weight of impinged adult alewife in .
1986 was 34.4 gn/ fish which is the largest of the five year ',
period. .
- The impingement of alewives at Ginna Station does not appear to reflect the Lake Ontario lakewide alewife population fluctuation. liighest alewife impingement rates were found when wind speeds werc <10 mph and winds were from the west.
Most impingement occurred during the lower intake velocities associated with one pump operation. Temperatures below 50 0T
{} accounted for most adult alewife impingement.
- Smelt impingement in 1986 was about 19,000 fish, which was substantially lower than the 35,000 impinged in 1985, and bounded by the extreme ranges of 10,000-66,000 fish /yr. Total smelt biomass in 1986 was 132 kg, again in the middle of the 82-1200 range for 1982-1986. Juvenile smelt normally account for 60-70 percent of the annual smelt impinger.ent. Average weig'4t of adult smelt in 1986 decreased substantially f rom i
198tl and was the five year low at 12.9 gn/ fish.
t
- An overall three year trend (1984-1986) can be seen between j svolt impingement and lakewide population, both measurements iO 2
l showed peaks in 85. Adult smelt impingement peaked with winds speeds >. tph and wind from the west. Impingement rate increases with one pump operation and most smelt are impinged in water temperatures of 32-40 0r.
Yellow perch impingement was 100 fish in 1986, which was a drop from the 450 impinged in 1985, and is similar to the pre-1985 values. The 1985 peak rate is attributed to juveniles impinged in that year. Yellow perch biensss in 1986 accounted for 18 kg, the second highest of the five year period. The average weight of the adult yellow perch impinged in 1986 was 19I. gn/ fish.
While no quantifiable estimates of 1skevide y311ov perch concentrations are available, longer term studies indicate that the population is presently decreasing in numbers.
Since only 100 adult yellow perch are impinged per year, the value of yellow perch in assessing lake populations is quite limited. Yellow perch impingement was highest during wind speeds >15 mph and slightly higher with winds from the west.
Impingement was highest with one pump operation and most occurred when water temperatures were 32-40 0r.
Total fish impingement at Ginna Station during 1986 was projected to be 87,000 fish. This was the second lowest pro-jocted number of fish impinged during the five year period o >
d i
m .-
1
\-
analyzed and the lowest year of impingement when the data is normalized into Fish / Billion Gallons (F/BG) . The general decrease in impingement numbers f ound in 1986 was observed for all of the species which were analyzed in this report.
Annual numbers ranged from 63,000 fish in 1983 to 176,000 fish in 1985. Biomass impinged in 1986 ?,otaled 3400 kg ya the range of 3200-7100kgduring1982thtrough1986.
For impingement of all species the following environmental conditions resulted in the highest impingement rates: Wind speeds of >15 mphs wind direction from west; one pump operation; water temperatures <50 degrees F.
O O
4
- 'i, ,
h RGaE REPORT NO. B-13-288 ROCHESTER CAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1977-1981 IMPINGEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
REPORC CINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION O
Repor t Prepared by: Beak Conn ul ti?E , Inc.
July, 1985 9
1
,V 11 CONCLUSIONS Results of to analysis of imps.acnt data collected from 1977 through 1981 are sumarized below, o An estimated 714,297 fish, or an average of 0.775 fish per million gallons of intake flow, were impinged from 1977 through 1981. This total was composed of 48 species, o Annual impingement was greatest in 1977 (156,634 fish) and least in D81 1122,958).
o Rainbow smelt was the most frequently inipinged species, f ollowed by alewife and threespine stickleback. These species made up almost 80%
of all fish impinged from 1977 tbrcugh 1981, o Other species contributing at least one percent of the five year catch were gizzard shad, spottail shiner, white perch, mottled sculpin, white bass, emerald shiner and lake chub.
o Over the five years 12,187 kg of fish or 0.013 kg per million gallons of intake flow were impinged. Alewife, smelt and gizzard shad
(]_
composed 84% of all biomass impinged, o Overall impingement rates were greatest in the winter and spring months, and lowest in the sumer months.
o Rainbow smelt and ;1ewife were most frequently impinged during the winter and spring months. Both species were infrequently impinged in sumer, o Seasonal gravimetric (biomass) changes usually reflected changes in species abundance, o Nighttime impingement was consistently greater than daytime for smelt, stickleback, alewife, spottail shiner, emerald shiner, white perch, mottled sculpin and lake chub. Only gizzard shad display the inverse relationship. Residence time in the forebay may have an undetenninable effect on these results.
o Based on all species, impingement rates were generally greatest with conditions of lake temperatures between 410 F and 500 F, average wave heights of 3.1 ft to 4.0 f t., winds from the north and northwest.
Impinsement rates when one pump was running was twice as great as when both pumps were running. These results may be confounded by the number of fish available for impingement.
O l
2
t, RG&E REPORT NO. BE-13-042 o
O ltECO!LIENDATIONS ON TllE FUTUltE OPERATIONS OF Tile lt.E. GINNA INTAL;E SYSTE:.1 t ITil itESPECT TO ENTitAPSIE:;T add /OR FIsli :10llTALITY O
llOCllESTEll GAS AND LLECTitIC COllPORATION DECE!.! Belt, 1077 O
e.
4
4.0 CONCLUSION
S OF STUDIES This section summari:es the conclusions of each of the studies presented in Section 3, and coordinates the studies' results to derive overall conclusions with respect to fish entrap-ment and/or entrainment and methods available to reduce these occurrences.
4.1 CONCLUS!ONS OF :::CIVIDUAL STUDIES 4.1.1 Conclusion of In-plant Impingement Studies _
From the discussions in Section 3.1 it can be concluded that most of the fish impingement occurs in the springtime during @
the months of '4 arch thrcugh June. This is true both fer total impinge-ment and on a species basis for the eleven species reviewed. On' the other hand, the least amount cf impingement occurs during the summer =cnths. The alewife dominates the total spring :=pingement projections; however, the numbers impinged vary substantially f rom year to year and have been less in recent years (1975 and 1976) than in 1973 and 1974. Smelt, normally the second most ab undant species impinged, have shown less fluctuation than alewives, yet their numbers have still varied by 30,000 - 50,000/yr. Threespine stickleback have varied greatly in numbers over the four years reviewed, and became second most abundant in 1976. Most species are impinged in fewer numbers, and in general few species are impinged in numbers greater than 10,000/ year. Forage fish dominate the impingement collections while collection of game fish is very light.
.; umbers of alewives impinged range from 2.4 x 106 to 9
0.2 x 19 6 /yr. Assuming a lakewide population of 1 x 10 llh alewives, lake cropping impact ranges from 0.24 to 0.02%/yr.
a_,
4 4
9 This percentage impact is considered to be acceptable for main-taining the present lakewide alevife population. Numbers of smelt impinged ranged f rom 1. 8 x 105 to g,9 x loS/yr. Ccmparing these rates to an estimated lake population range of 3.7 x 10 7 to 24.4 x 107, the maximum percent impact is 0.5%. This order of impact is considered to be tolerabic to the lakewide smelt population.
Reliable lakewide estimates are not available for other species impinged. However the forage base at the Ginna Site is quite large as evidenced in the Sinna 3ite lake studies (RG&E, 1977c), and similar forage communities exist all along the shore-line of Lake Ontario (e.g. at the Sterling Site, (RG&E, 1977d)).
lh Therefore the numbers projected to be impinged Annually should not be dctrincntal to maintaining a sufficient forage base in Lake Ontario and should not stress any particular species. While some large fish may be impinged in numbers exceeding 1000/yr, the gill net studies indicate the local populations of these fish are sizeable enough to be able to withstand this impinge-ment. The most highly priced game fish (e.g. Smallmouth bass, yellow ,
perch, br wn trout, lake trout, coho and chinook salmon, bullheads, etc.)
are impinged in extremely small numbers if impinged at all.
The data in Section 3'1 suggests that year to year .
variability can be great, and that the studies conducted are insuf-fucient to describe the complete impingement situation due to this (
variability. This is exemplified in the great ranges of im-k pingement for alewife, smelt, stickleback, trout, yellow perch, 4-2
'. l l
+=
[I ) ' emerald shiners, etc. . Finally, the year 1975 in general, for
- many' species, differed substantially from the other three years reviewed. Both the-variability-in annual impingement rates and the differences found -in 1975 suggest that more monitoring is necessary.
4.1.2 Conclusions.Of Impingement Survival Studies Table 4.1-1 presents the annual loss-of the impinged species reviewed in-Sections 3.1 and 4.1 when an-adjustment is made to account.for impingement survival. Based on the impingement sur-
- vival studies-it-can be concluded'that few alewives and smelt would survive impingement at Ginna. About 95% of the alewives '
impinged and about 85% of the smelt impinged are expected to be killed.. In other cases, depending upon species, a high number-of impinged fisn are expected to survive (Table 3.1-1) .
Over 754 of-the threespine stickleback should survive, which would' reduce the loss to this species to a range of 1,128-34,178/yr. Generally,-loss of' forage species is conservatively ,
aboutione half of the numbers-impinged. Also,ffew sportsfish will be killed due to impingement (e . g . smallmouth bass range:
16-57/ year; brown trout: -0/yr). The already low impingement rates for-game fish species, coupled with the survival study results, indicate an extremely minor impact upon the local populations of these species.
4.1.3 Conclusions of Behavioral Barrier Testing
- The three behavioral barrier devices tested (i.e., air:
()( bubble. curtain, hanging chains, and water jets) did effectively
. reduce alewife and smelt entrainment in the labcratory, relative
~
to a contro1, by about_40 percent. The devices tested did not 4
5 e w w-wwrm u,--g,-w-ww-.- rw w.-, --.w.s. ,g--w .y w. .-. ,,.--e r - , . ,.,.e-_yc. ,,.__.wy. ,.mwr ,,.43 p.,g,, ,y ,-,-.,-.---yn,.gryn----
s wr-t.w w wy - m =g-yw = wnry
_ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . . , _ . . - _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . - . . ~ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _
4 a
fdiffer significantly in their relative effectiveness. Therefore, the results-suggest that anylone of these devices would reduce-impingement at Ginna. In applying these results to the impinge-4 ment situation at Ginna it should be pointed out that the e
4
.laborat'ory _ testing was donc under water temperatures ranging from ,
44.0' to 68.7'T (6.7' to 20.4*C) for smelt and 66.0' to_79.0'F ;
(18.9' to 26.l'C) for alewife. Over the four years of i 4 emenu -
studies reviewed in section 3.1, the mean water tempe +
observed at Ginna has been 36.5'F (2.5'C) during March, 40.6*F-(4.8'C)-during April and 46.9'F (8.3*C) during May, which are the imonths of heaviest. smelt and alewife impingement. S&W (-19 7 6a ) stated that alewives were not able to swim against a 1.0 fps flow at _
temperatures below 4.4*C (10'F), and did not respond to a 0.1 O fps ficw at temperatures below 3.3*C (38'F). Further testing L demonstrated that hanging chains were not effective in reducing entrapment relative to a control-in_ water temperatures below 139'? (3.9'C). It is: concluded _that since ambient temperatures Eare so low, and assuming that the alewives present in these
- - ; months may have suffered from a natural cold shock in their h z shoreward migration -(passing 'through' areas. of less than 40*F '
i.
(3.9'C)) , the behavioral barriers would not be as ef fective in reducing the spring impingement situation of alewives at Ginna as they were!found to be in the laboratory. testing in a much higher temperature range. Their effectiveness at other i- times of the year and for all other species would probably be similar to the laboratory results.
l
( )'
4-4
l C 4.1.4 Conclhsions of Engineering-Feasibility and Cost Analysis
) . .
- Any-of_the three_ types _of barriers studied could be installed at the Ginna intake structure, and would be accessible for repair or replacement. No plant downtime for installation would be needed.
The hanging chains would be the least expensive a]ternative, as shown on Table 4.1- 2. However, the chains are most susceptible to high wave action, debris and icing.
The air curtain is init' ally costly, but is not excessively expensive to operate and maintain. The-unique ha:ard it presents
=is allowing air-into the_ intake system, but this is expected to be rare.
O Finally, the water jet curtain would_be expensive both to install and to cperate. It would, however, be less susceptiole to wave L damage-than either of the previous alternatives.
Of the three systems, only the hanging chains.are expected to l
l be affected by ice, since-they are unheated. Algae growth l
l l may affect both the air and water jet curtains, with their _
smallino: les, and the chains, which lack the! dislodging water or air flow,:but-it is not expected to render them ineffectual.
I In summary,.all three barriers could.probably be installed and operated effectively, but at fairly high cost. Considering total
[ . costs,-hanging chains are the preferable barrier, followed by air-bubbles and water jets, in that order,
)-
r 1
dE
_ . . . _ _ . . . _ ~ _ _ _ _ - . .__ ._. , . - - . .~ , . - _ . - _ _ - . - - . _
_._ _ ._ _ _ _ . _ . _ ._ _ . ~ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
4.2 DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS Alewives are the dominant species impinged, comprising _
~between-50 to over 90 percent of each. year's impingement pre-
-j ec t ion . Generally over 90 percent of the impingement of this species occurs during April and May. Impingement survival of this species seems to be very low, so that in-effect nearly all of the alewives impinged will be killed. Behavioral barriers may be able to reduce.entrainment of this species during periods of warmer water temperatures, however, little effectiveness with respect to this species can be expected from these barriers during periods of cooler water, which unfortunately includes the months of'their heaviest impingement, i.e. April and May. Since all i the behavioral barriers tested had similar efficiencies, the engineering feasibility and economics of installation and operation
(-
l of each barrier l lead to the selection of hanging chains as the preferred barrier. The estimated installation cost of this device is nearly 5800,000 with an annual maintenance cost of $10,000/ year.
These factors lead to the conclusion 1that-installation ofla behavioral barrier will not substantially reduce the alewife impingement situation. This conclusion should also consider that alewife impingement has shown great variability over the four-years (1973-1976),-and in fact has shown a drop of an order of magnitude. The additional impingement studies conducted
.(i . e. fer the years 1974., 1975-and 1976) have demonstrated that the highest levels of 2.4 x 10 6 alewives / year . are not an annual l
occurrence, and this fact itself suggests that impingement at Ginna I
O
~
a-n
- is not as large a problem as it was originally believed to be.
lh However, aside from the absolute numbers impinged, the percentage of the lakewide alewife population that is impinced at Ginna Station is in the order of only 0.2 percent maximum. The theor-etical ineffectiveness of the barriers in alleviating the majority of the alewife impingement, the decrease in the impingement rate of alewives, and the low percentage of impact upon the total alewife population, does not warrant the expenditurc of S800,000 for a hehavioral device.
Plant shutdown during periods of heaviest irpingement (i.e., the spring months) should be mentioned as a possible modi-fication in plant operations. It has been concluded that this is not reliacle alternative due to the many restraints surrounding the scheduling of plant shutdown, including scheduling by the G .;ew York Power Pool to meet state-wide power recuirements. As a result, plant shutdown cannot be rigidly scneduled to take place during projected impingement peaks. .;cnethe le s s , in a shutdown situation, normal procedure is to crerate caly one of L the two main circulating water pumps, which would reduce the water flow through the plant approximately fifty percent. Assuming a direct proportion between water withdrawal volume and numbers of organisms impinged, the use of only one pump would likewise reduce impingement accordingly. This mode of operation has been utilized in the past and it will be used in the future, when possible.
O 4-7
Other forage fish (including smelt) are impinged in l rates of 150,000 to 250,000/ year. In most years over 75 percent of these have been smelt. The impingement of smelt generally peak in the spring, however, since most of these species can tolerate cooler water better than the alewife, the behavioral barri 's may be more effective in reducing the impingement of this si ' Tide f ro:n smelt , anywhere from 1/3 to over 3/4 of ti.
- 9hown the ability to survive impingement. The loss to impingement at Ginna has been conservatively estimat :s 0.5 percent of the lakewide population /
year. A 1 .a 1.g n avi.:ral barriers may affectively reduce im-pingement of these forage species the numbers of species impinged and the generally high survival rates do not justify the ex-() penditure of S300,000 in order to reduce the impingement by less than half, nt: do they warrant tperational modifications as described above.
The impingement of larger and game fish varies both by species and by year. Impingement may at times become sub-stantial (e.g, 5000-6000/ year for white perch and white bass),
however, the normal maximum level for non-game large fish is around 1000-1500 fish / species / year. The levels of game fish are generally in the 100-200 fash/ year range with some isolated peaks up to 1000/ year. These levels of impingement for the various species do not seem detrimental to their populations.
In addition, a number of these species show high survival rates which would further reduce impact. While behavioral barriers
)
may reduce impingement of these species somewhat, their costs 4-8
P e
h are not justified by anticipated impingement impact upon these species. Neither are plant operation modifications as described above warranted.
In summary, behavioral barriers would not reduce impinge-ment during the heaviest periods, i.e. alewives in the spring months. Nonetheless, present impingement levels of this species suggest minimal detrimental impact to this species, and therefore plant operational modifications are also not warranted. Although the absolute numbers of other species impinged may be reduced by installation of behavioral barriers, such installation is not i
justified based upon the costs of such barriers. Impingement of these species is so variable frem species to species and time .
to time that modificaulon in plant operation is not practical.
1 0
4-9
TADLE 4.1-1 ANNUAL LOSS OF SELECTED SPECIES DUE TO IMPINGEMENT ADJUSTED FOR IMPINGEMENT SURVIVAL
- Species Nunbers Impinged / year 1973 1974 1975 1976 Alewife 2,275,159 1,785,342 215,171 641,611 Smelt 155,064 105,158 103,997 77,064 Threespine Stickleback 4,013 1,129 7,936 34,178 Spottail Shiner 13,224 4,573 1,571 3,256 Mottled Sculpin 1,256 799 1,064 745 Gi::ard Shad 1,057 1,337 1,508 996 0
g.lowPerch 0 0 0 Smallmouth Bass 5 ,' 36 16 31 Brown Trout 0 0 0 0 Lake Trout 0 0 4 53 3rown Bullhead NS NS NS NS
- - Derived from annual estimates presented in Table 3.1-1 and average rate of survival from Table 3.2-1.
- - Not Studied in Survival Tests .
- ,.. -_ _ - - ..- - ~ .. ~ ~ - - - - .- - .- _ . - - -- - - ...-- . - ~ . . - -
1 Table 4.1-2 BEHAVIORAL BARRIERS CO!
(1977 DOLLARS)
Capitali:ed . Annual Cost-of Operating Maintenance-g -
Behavioral ~ Barrier Installation (S) Cost (S) Cost ( S )
Hanging Chains 792,000 0 10,000
, Air-Bubble Curtain 1,625,000 9,840 10,000
- with. Trenched Pipeline Water Jet Curtain 2,135,000 164,000 10,000 with Trenched
. Pipeline O
i P'*
RGLE REPORT NO. B-13-035 O
l ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION IMPINGEMENT
SUMMARY
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1973 - 1974 O
REPORT PREPARED BY:
JOHN F. STORR, PH.D.
JUNE, 1975 0
\
,%n F. Stm Ph.D.
CoNsutTANT N LiuNoLooy AND OCEANoca APHY
- di FAiRwave souttvAno OvFFALO, N OW Yo R K 14221 f' %
( i TEL. 7te . 63J 8470
~_)
June 17, 1975 IMPINGEMENT
SUMMARY
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1973-1974 INTRODUCTION Approximately 400,000 gallons of cooline water per minute from Lake Cntario pass through the Ginna Nuclear
() Power Station. The water is drawn from the lake through m
a submerged intake structure which is located 3100 feet from shore in approximately 30 feet of water. The structure is octagonal, with a tcp located approximately 15 feet below regulated low water datum, and it draws water horizontally through eight (10 x 17.3 ft.) port openings.
With such a large flow of water, it is to be expected that certain organisms (such as fish and plankton) present in the lake would be carried alcng with the water into the plant. This process is termed "entrainment". Fish, which constitute the greater part of the entrained biomars and which would interfere with plant operations, are pre-vented from passing through the pumps and condensers by
[v ') traveling screens placed in the pump house structure.
I There are four " traveling screens" of 3/8 in. mesh which lll are operated sequentially every hour for a period of 15 minutes each, Fish which are retained against these screens by the force of the flowing water are termed " impinged" and are removed from the system and returned to the lake, via a sluiceway and the discharge canal.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study was to determine the fol-lowing:
- 1) the numbers and species (groups) of fish which l are being impinged,
- 2) the survival rates of the impinged species, l l
- 3) the effects of environmental conditions on the rate of impingement,
- 4) determination of population parameters and as-sociated impacts, and
- 5) the impact of impingement of various species.
The data collected were carefully analyzed in light of these objectives. Findings were substantiated by stat-istical analysis wherever possible. The results of these analyses are presented in this summary of the fish im-pingement study undertaken during 1973 and 1974 at the Ginna Nuclear Power Station.
Many of the calculations in this report were performed on the 1974 data only, since the 1973 study was considered to be a pilot study in which procedures were to be de-veloped (Fish Impingement Studies Appendix D, Part 5, 11C-2
Application by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corpcration b
N/ to the New York State Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need to construct two fcssil-fuel fired electric generating units in the 600 megawatt site class at a site in the Town of Sterling, Cayuga County,
- ew York).
It Fhould be noted that crayfish are excluded from this summary even though they were impinged regularly.
This was done because they would invalidate calculations done en fish populations and, secondly, because they dem-enstrated almost 100S, survival.
PROCEDURES Impingement studies were conducted by collecting the fish impinged during consecutive four-hour periods over 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. In many instances continuous studies were run l
fer 48, 72, and 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> to maximize the. reliability of the results by detecting diurnal rhythms and other daily varia-tions in numbers. The fish removed from the traveling water screens were sampled by placing a-3/8 in. mesh cage in the flow of.the sluiceway for the four-hour period.
Sometimes the cage filled cumpletely before the four-hour limit and had to be removed before the end of the collecting period. In such cases the total number of fish impinged during a specified sampling period was extrapolated to the full four-hour period. During each four-hour period t
v llc-3 l
l
10 fish (of each species) impinged were measured to de-termine the average length and average weight. From these, data bicmass, age class distribution, and fitness values were determined for each species impinged.
From January 1973 through December 1974, 118 24-hour studies were conducted. There were 34 studies in 1973 and 84 in 1974. Since, for the year 1973, alewives accounted for over 90% of the total fish impinged and the majority of this impingement occurred during April and May, the studies for 1974 were run more often during those months i 1
than other months.
For the purpose of this report, fish species were divided into the following four categories:
O
- ) Alewife (Alosa pseudohareneus)
II) Smelt (0smerus mordax)
I!!) Other forage fish, including:
Spottail shiner (Notropis hudsonius)
Threespine s tickleback (Gas teros teus aculeatus )
Lake chub (Couesius plumbea)
Mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi)
Common shiner (Notropis cornutus)
Johnny darter (Etheostoma nigrum)
Emerald shiner (Notropis atherinoides)
Trout perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus)
Central mudminnew (Umbra limi)
Greensided darter (Etheostoms blennioides)
IV) Larger fish and game fish, including:
White sucker (Catostomus commersoni)
White perch (Morone americana)
Rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris)
Gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum)
White bass (Morone chrysops)
Yellow perch (Perca flavescens)
Goldfish (Carassius auratus) lll Carp (Cyprinus c_arpio)
Pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) llc-4
Brown bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus) _
j
()
Eel (Anguilla rostrata) '-
Smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui)
Freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens)
Brown trout (Salmo trutta; Bluegill (Lecomis macrocnirus)
Burbot (Lota lota)
Black bullhead (Ictalurus melas)
Black crappie (Pomox1s nigromaculatus)
Walleye (Stizostecion vitreum vitreum)
The following fish, although present in the lake (as de-termined by gill net studies dcne at the Ginna Site), were not found to be impinged during the twc years of this study:
Northern pike (Esox lucius)
Muskellunge (Esox masauinongy)
Cisco (Coregonus artec11)
Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)
Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)
Lake trout (Salvelinus namayeush)
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS A complete report on fish impingement studies and survival rates after impingement at the Ginna Suclear Power Station for the January-December 1974 period is presented at the end of this Impingement Summary Report.
1 -- Numbers and Species (Groups) of Fish Imoinced A. Yearly Numbers of fish impinged were recorded for each 24-hour sampling period. From these numbers a projection was made to predict the probable total impingement per year using 1974 data only.
Yearly impingement rates were developed using actual data and inter-sampling period projections in accordance with 11C-5
the following expression: lll TPI = A + PI where A = y,y Nj and PI = b (") + "$+1) at
]=1 ,
TPI = total projected number of impinged fish A = total number of actual fish impinged during n sampling periods N3 = number of fish actually impinged during sampling period j n = number of 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> sampling periods
?! = tctal projected number of fish impinged between known sampling periods at = number of days between sampling period j and j+1 The reliability of each prediction is determined by looking lll at the total number of fish actually sampled as a percentage of the total number predicted for the year.
Frem a total actual sample number of 1,001,804 alewives impinged, a yearly prediction of 1,883,970 impinged alewives in 1974 was obtained. This actual sample represents 53.18%
of the predicted total and produces a confidence at the 99% level. The following table provides the yearly pre-l dictions for each group studied along wi:h the percent act-ually sampled for each group:
1 Actual Yearly Actually Reliability Species Sample Prediction Sampled of Prediction i Alewife 1,001,804 1,883,970 53.18 99%
1 Smelt 31,187 123,130 25.33 95%
Other forage 7,746 37,208 20.82 90%
lll Larcer &
Game 946 5,223 18.11 85%
l llc-6 l
The rates at which these fish were impinged */aried
(])
from species to species throughout the year. In the foll-owing discussion, the majority of the referenced Figures 1 through 12 present both 1973 and 1974 results. Most cal-culations have been based solely on the 1974 material; however, 1973 results were also analyzed and are presented :n order to show the great similarities that exist between the two years. The highest alewife impingement rate was in the spring, mainly in April. This can be seen in Figure 1 where in 1974, 75% of the yearly tttal was irminged in April and 17S. in May. The remaining 51 is spread :*/er the other ten months of the year. Figure la presents the cum-ulative impingement by month to indicate the rate f im-() pingement during each month of the year. The steeper the f impingement.
siepe of the lir.e, the greater is the rate This figure shows an almost vertical line between the icw March rate and the much greater April rate. The line then levels off with a steady impingement rate ever the rest of
- he year.
Smelt, the other single important species, exhibited a similar, but slightly different, impingement pattern.
Figure 2 shows a peak of impingement in the late winter with a significant increase in the late fall and early winter period. The rates of impingement shown in Figure a indicate that the greatest rates were from Movember through April with a significant lessening through the summer.
O llc-7
9 Other forage species showed a more erratic impingement, as can be seen in Figure 3. This is because different forage species exhibit different patterns of impingement. The rates of impingement of three individual species, which were impinged in sufficient numbers in 1973 to allow such cal-culations, are graphically illustrated on Figurec 3a through l
l 3c. Spottail shiners (Figure 3a) and lake chub (Figure 3b) l exhibit rate patterns similar to those of alewives and smelt, I while the mottled sculpin (Figure 3c) has a fairly constant impingement rate over the year Mottled sculpin impingement was fcund to be due to weath9r conditions and will be discussed further in Section 3 cf this summary.
The game and larger non-game fish were impinged in such low numbers that determination of individual species O impingement rates was not possible. Impingement of the group as a whole is illustrated in Figure 4, which shows that the greatest impingement occurred in the winter and early spring months (December through April) .
An estimation of the. numbers of fish which are likely to be impinged over a 12-month period at the Ginna Station has been determined with some level of confidence. Also, it has been demonstrated that within a grouping significant interspecific variations can occur.
l B. Dailv^
l A peak rate of impingement between sunset and sunrise l was apparent by examination of a plot of the interval per- llh centage of all species of fish versus the time period sampled.
IlC-8
e
_9 4
I
()' Figures 5 and 5a present these data for 1973 and 1974 res-pectively. Fish distribution analyses conducted at the Ginna Site with an echo-sounder shew that during the night the fish rose off the bottom and 7.oved inshore ceccming available for entrainment in the intake structure. Also, during darkness it is believed that fish usually lose some crientation thrcugh the loss of visual cues and thus are less able to detect slight water ficws, such as those which occur near intake structures, until it is too late to escape.
- 2. Survival of Fish After the Impingement Experience In conjunction with the impingement studies, a survival study was carried out to observe the recovery cf fish species ever a 24-hcur period. A full report of this study, when completed, will be included in the 1974 Impingement Report, A summary of this study has indicated the following:
- a. In general, game fish and other larger species tended to survive impingement very well. Ferage fish, on the other hand, seemed to be very susceptible to damage ,
by impingement. However, because of the high fecundity of forage species, the impact of impingement would be very small on the area populations,
- b. Although the numbers of a given species impinged can vary greatly from season to season, the survival rates seemed to be relatively stable throughout the year.
- c. Juveniles, in general, did not survive impingement very well and almost always did more poorly than the adults of the same species.
IlC-9
v 9
O From the calculated percentages of survival, the pro- l bable yearly mortality levels of alewives and smelt due to 1
impingement were projected as follows:
1 1
Yearly Yearly Projected Impingement survival Projected Mortality species '
(1974) 1,883,970 3,7g 1,814,263 Alewife 123,130 27.7% 89,023 j Smelt 3 Effects of Environmental Conditions The following environmental conditions were examined using analysis of variance, linear regression and goodness of fit calculations:
- a. Water temperature
- b. Wave activi ty (height)
- c. dind direction
- d. Cloud cover i e. Wind velocity The only parameters that seemed to exhibit any discernible effects cr. the numbers of fish impinged were water temperature, wave activity (height) and wind direction. Water tempera-ture was the most significant condition.
Wind direction was found to correlate slightly (p < 0.2, 80% significant) with the impingement of mottled sculpin.
! When the wind blew from the south or southeast, the sculpin were impinged in slightly higher numbers than at any other time. This was due to the fact that sculpin is a bottom fish. When a strong sustained vind blows offshore, the surface water is driven from shore. This water is replaced 11C-10 l
1
I
() by deeper water flowing shoreward along the bottcm of the i lake and upwelling at depth locations comparable to that of the intake structure. It is believed the sculpin are carried passively along with this very slight current, which is below their level of senscry perceptien, and therefore will not invoke an avoidance reaction.
There was an indication that wave activity (height) had an effect on the numbers impinged. Although not re-flected by the statistical results, there appeared to be a definite indication from the data that impingement genertily increased as wave height increased. This as because an increase in turbulence causes the fish to rise off of the bottom to avoid abrasion and take shelter behind the tatake O- structure, thus beccming susceptible to impingement.
Temperature ".as a highly significant effect on the numbers of impinged fish. The greatest impingement cccurred during months when the mean monthly- t:mperature was at er below 4'C (3 9'F) . This phenomenon held true fcr all groups of fish studied and in each case was significant at greater than the 951 level of confidence.
The effect is probably due to cold stress which limits the fishes' swimming ability and orientation. Since fish are poikilotherms (cold blooded) their body temperature reflects the temperature of their surroundings. Hence, as the water cools, their bodily functions are slcwer and they are less able to respond to and swim against the currents O of the intake flow. Conversely, as the water warms the fish become more active and are better able to avoid entrainment.
IlC-ll
l Figures 6,7,8, and 9 show the mean monthly temperature versus the percentage of total fish in any species impinged during that month for alewives, smelt, other forage species, and game and larger fish.
Linear regression analysis, using least squares fit, was used to determine the relationship between impingement and temperature.
Figure 6 shows how alewife impingement rates changed with temperature. As the temperature receded toward 4*C, the impingement rate climbed to a peak and then fell off rapidly below 4*C, This showed an increasing susceptibility to colder temperatures, with very cold temperatures excluding the alewives frcm the area. Smelt showed a similar pattern except that impingement continued to increase with the 9
greatest increase belcw 4*C (Figure 7). Forage fish, game and larger fish, also showed similar patterns (Figures 8 and 9 respectively). This demonstrates that the rate of impingement of fish in general is correlated closely with the temperature of the water, and that at lower temperatures fish are less able to avoid the intake currents.
- 4. Determination of Population Parameters and Associated Impacts In order to conduct studies of fish populations, some method of capture which is reliable and consistent is needed in ordor to produce usable results. Even tnough the actual area sampled by meanc of the intake is small and stationary, ggg the consistency of sampling regardless of time or weather con-ditions is large. In addition, the fish after entrainment llc-12
() are tc sported throuch the r- .. 13 ten anc. rencved for study.
U s i r. , th3 dater of cone cut. sar- ing pericas :t, and A
t,), the numbers .: ::ch impinged or these - *es (::1 and ':;) ,
and their average weights iG-- and I. , *t2 : llowing :: ara-meters were :alculat<d ue .? the -- :ct. formulas:'
a) An in s t an t a r.ec e s roefficle t f growth (G) dG/dt = ( In;. ; - inw,), ,.
t..)
b) An inst:.ntanecus ::cf ficic..: Of mortality ':)
d"/dt = - (Int:2 - in::1), ,t2 - tl) c) and f ren a) and b), the average bicmass (B) over the periods for dG/dt > d /dt dG/dt-d2/dt B = :i,w1 (e 3)
(dG/dt - d;/ct) and for dG/dt < d*/dt a
r = N,w1 (1 - e- (d: /d t-dG/d t ) )
(d2/dt -
dG/dt) d) Production (P), then, is P= (dG/dt)B Using the above formulas, the following determinations were made for alewives and smelt in Lake Ontario:
- 1) Using a mean fearly Siomass of smelt equal to 0.811E o
g/m", a calculated ficure of 10.5 billion smelt was determined for the mean population of the lake.
- 2) Using a mean yearly biomacs of alewives equal to 2.029 g/m', a mean povelation estimate of 25.6 billion was made.
O -
Reference:
Ricker, .1 . 1971, Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh W^* prs, JBP Handboor. 53, Second ed.,
BlacP.well, Oxford.
1_G-13
a , - .. .
l i
- 3) The production of smelt biomass equaled an aver age lll of 0.018 g/m / day.
- 4) The production of alewife bicmass equaled an aversgo 2
of 0.047 g/m / day.
The following table indicates the percent of the mean pcpulations of alewivet and smelt which were impinged in 1974:
Est. Mean Population in Yearly Projected Species Lake Ontario Impincement (1974) % Impinced/ Yea,r Alewife 25.6 billion 1,883,970 0.00736 Smelt 10.5 billio- 123,130 0.00117 These "% Impinged / Year" values are insignificant con-sidering that the expected natural yearly mortalities for each species is 50% of the population.* ggg Frem informatien en total numbers of each species im-
- pinged during each study period, both the Simpson's and Shannon-Weiner diversity indices were also determined.
Species diversity determinations are plotted in Figure 10 as mean monthly diversity. Two low points are apparentt (I) in April and May, when the alewif e run which excludes most ether fish species from the shore area, and (II) in August, when the water temperatures are highest. 7n warmer water the larger fish of any species are most active ano are, therefore, best able to overcome the flow cf the intche (see Figuroc 6-9). Divorcity in highcot during the coldest months when all fish are less active and, therefore, most
- Reference Everhart, W.H., A.W. Eipper and W.O. Youngs, 1975, Principles 01 Fishery science, Cornell University 1 Press, Ithaca. )
v ----- ..
l l
l
( susceptible to entrainment and impingement, rigures 11 and 12 present average weight versus t;me of year for alewives and smelt. Ecth curves are simi;ar and can be interpreted in the f:llcwing ways (I) Highest average weights occur when water is cold and adults are less able to avcid impingement. The pop-ulation would be made up of gravid females and large males, with the smallest fish being of year class ene.
(II) Average weight of impinged fisn decreases as:
a) adults die after spawning; b) water warms and adults avoid impingement; and c' ;uveniles, hatched in the spring,
- oin the population.
(!!!) The icwest average weight reflects the ability
( of adults to avoid impingement in the warmer water and the predominance of young fish in the pcpu.at;:n.
(IV ) Tseflects increased impingement :f adults as the water cecis and grcwth of the younger meniers cf the pep-ulation.
A ccmparisen of Figures 11 and 12 with Tigures 1 and 2 shows that the numbers impinged drop off much faster for both alewives and smelt than the average weight of impinged fish. This supports the belief that there must be a high Such a rapid post-spawn:.ng mortality for both species.
could Only drop in numbers, as seen in Figures 1 and 2, occur due to avoidance of impingement, migration, or post-spawning mortality.
'.lhile the migratory and avcid-O ance activities cannot take place in the short time period of One to two menths, mortality can. Thus the sharp
_ ,m
..,_ +s is
^ ~ - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - _ ~ _ . _ _ _ _
drepoffs on rigures 1 and 2 indicate that migration and/ llh or avoidance of remaining adults increase throughout the summer, until the tuveniles dcminate :mpingement.
The summary presented above demonstrates conclusively that the actual impact of impingener.; en lake populations is not significant and is greatly overshadewed by natural rhythms and fluctuations in the lake.
5 -- Discussion of :mpingement cf various species A. Alewife ( Alesa pseudoharengus)
Ari estimate of the numbers of alcwives in the lake was calculated and presented in section 4 of this report.
In the summary report for the 1973 impingement studies, actual counts of alewives recorded en traces along trans-(l) ects cut into the lake were used, frem this it was estimated that the number of alewives in Lake Ontario was between 20 to 35 billion. The estimate developed in Section 4 used a ecmpletely different technique, yet the result arrived at was well within the range predicted in the 1973 study.
Assuming 1,8EO,000 alewives were impinged annually, as calculated from the 1974 studies, the portion of the alewife population impinged in any one year could range from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 15,000 (or 0. 01% to 0.006% of the population).
Such a low number would have imperceptible impact on the total alewife population.
Assuming that the rate of impingement is directly related to the density per unit volume of water (a reasonable lll assumption for this pelagic fish species), the percent of the llc-16
() population impinged will always remain at stout the same
- evel regardless cf the alewife populaticn icvel and the effect of impingement en the pcpulation will be about the same for any one year.
Taking into consideration also the fact that about 951 cf the alewife impingement occurs in April when shore temperatures hre considered to be lethal or near lethal for this fish, the effect of impingement is substantially reduced belew the levels calculated above since the slew fe wculd die from lethal temperatures whether they were impinged or not.
B. Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax)
The level of the smelt population in Lake Ontario hac been estimated to be 10.5 billion based upon studies presented O in this report.
The yearly projected number of smelt impinged at Ginna a s presented in Secticn 4 of this report was ll3,130/ year, or approximately 0.00117% of the estimated mean population in the lake. For this species, as for the alewives (both of which are pelagic fish occupying the upper and mid watets of the lake), the numbers impinged will vary proportionally with fish concentration per unit volume of water. The percent of the population impinged from year to year, there-fore, would remain unchanged. This percentage is so Icw as to indicate an imperceptibio effect en the population.
() llc-17
I The survival studies carried cut in 1974 indicate that a good portion (27.7%) of the smelt being impinged at Ginna were able to survive the stress of impingement.
Consequently, the impact of impingement of the lakewide smelt populatien may be expected to be cf a icw order.
C. Other Fish There is very little information available concerning populations of other fish in Lake Ontario. The cruises of the R/V Kaho in 1972 (conducted in accord with ITYGL Studies) have yielded some infermation, but data on commercial catches is very scant. The effect of impact of impingement can only be implied in the fol10 wing discussiens:
- 1. Threespine stickleback (Gasterosttus aculeatus)
The lake population as estimated from the R/V Kaho cruises is about 2,000,000. This is a very conservative figure since the minimum sampling depth was only 10 m (33 ft) while most sticklebacks are probably in shallow water. The yearly prediction of the number impinged at Ginna was est-imated c.: 7,300/ year, which indicates that much larger num-bers are to be found inshore. Assuming only 2,000,000 sticklebacks in the lake, impingement effect would be 0.39%
of the population per year.
- 2. Yellow perch (Perca flavescens)
Lake Ontario landings of yellow perch in 1972 were approximately 1,473,000 fish. Impingement at Ginna was esti- ,
i mated to be 110 per year. Of the commercial landings this h l represents 7 in 10,000 or 0.007t. The effect of impingement i I
at Ginna was obviously of a very low order.
IlC-16
?
i Most of the yellow perch occupy the eastern end of the ;
lake as shown by the R/V Kaho samplings and by the fish tag ;
studies.*
Since the comparison is made only to ecmmercial landings, which most likely represent a small percentage cf the total population themselves, it may be assumed that the actual impact on the entire lake yellow perch population would be considerably less.
^
- 3. American eel (Anguilla rostrata), Bu11 heads (Ictalurus sp.), Northern Pike (Ecox lucius),
Sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus)
The same. technique used for yellow perch may be adapted ;
in estimating the percent of the commercial catch (for 1971) ,
impinged'of-the above four species.
Estimated Species commercial Total Percent Common:Name Landings Impingement Eby Weight (lbs) (1bs) i American-eel 206,000 55 .03 Bullheads 272,000 44 .02 Northern pike 17,000 18 .11 Sunfish 162,000 168 .10 ,
Commercial landing data are lacking for the-remainder
.of the species impinged at Ginna. For the four 7 species 1on the table above, the number impinged is.a very i
- Reference- NMPC, Fish Tagging Program, Nine Mile Point, August 1972 to September 1973.
.()- ;
llc-19 .
(
l O
small percentage of the commercial catch and therefore an even lower percentage of the actual numbers present in the lake.
O O
l l
l llc-20
- 10 0 -
f rigure i eer: eat c :et,1 x1em ve.
O 90- 4 i :mptr.ged vs. Month I
ll 80- I l'
o i
60- }
I I
O
- t-I o I
'~
40- '
u.
I i
>- I
= I W
1 0
- I w
- a. I 1 I '
, 20-l I L'
\
1 l
l O O- : c' '?
M
?
J K: ^
J A S
=
O
=
N D
J F M A
_ 1973
- 1974 MONTH 11C-21
^
10 0- i- 5 l ~ ~
Y #e-O 90- rigure la Cumulative Irppingement of Alewives by Month 80-o 60-O t
40-H .
=
w 0
a:
w O.
20 -
O
^
~' '
O- , .
O N D J F M A tA J U A S 19?.3 19e-MONTH
i Tigure 2 80- percent or ota; smet: :: p i ._,y e ;
vs. Mont.n J 60-H O
H LA e o f
>_. 40-2 O w o ,
CC W \
- a. \ ,
\ A 20- \ /\
\ / \
\ f/ \
\l/ k\ r
\'
.* .s a s
% __JLs - .
/
// ,
O , . . . . . .- . . . . .
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D MONTH O ~ ~ ~
' h .; llc-23
10 0-i O
/
/
-e -* /
a = ~ e" ,e 80- /
el 6
! Figure 2a Cumulative Impingement of Smelt
/ by Month j
60- l to i
f I
If e I
I 40- 7 b e#
C o
CC W
Q.
20-i O'
J F M A M J J A S O N D 1974 MONTH 11C-24
O 60-Figure 3 Percent of Total "Other Forage Fish" Impinged vs.
Month J
H 40-o O*
u.
O F e Z
Lij o 20-
- cc .
tu
\
/\
' \
'\ . /\ /
\
\
/ \ /*\
/ \
.s, s ./
\.
\ . N/./ \\ ,.4.,,s
\
N.
g U k $ $ U U A $6 A 6 O MONTH
---;;;3 uc-2s
e 10 0-
./ .
O
,e*
80-e 60- Fi? " 38 umulative Impingement of
- Spottail Shiner by Month *
.J C ,
9 I
O t
- u. 40-o H
Z W
O W
CL 20-0 0
J F M A M J J A S O N D MONTH
.--, . . . . , IlC-26
0 10 0-O .
80-e -e 60- -
f, e#.
O a O
H Figure b Cumulati/e :mpincement of 40- * 'ake chuc by Mont.h*
LA.
O H
Z W
O
- K W
a.
20 -
O o
A M J J A S O N D J F M MONTH
- Based upon 1973 results 11C-27
10 0-l 0
80-
./.
./
/
60-J .
4 a
F-G
$ 40-b-
Z W
O >
tr W
Q.
Figure 3c 20 .
cumulative Impingement of e Mottled Sculpin by Month *
- /
O- . . . . . . . .
J F M A M J J A S O N D I
MONTH l
~
- Based upon 1973 results
O rigure 4 Percent of Total " Larger ':cr,-Omo ar.d Game Fish" Impinged */s. Mc....
60-J
<(
O H
45- ,
'\
u., I\
o /\
/ \
O r I \
z 30 / \
w I O
K
- l e w I o- I I
I5-
- N.N
- I l
I 1
%~e* N I
- /e O_ . . . .
f_w . -= t_s . e J F M A M J J A S O N D M ONTH 11C-29 O , _ 1973 1974
1 1
01 i
Figure 5 l Percent of Total Impingement i for All Fish vs. Time of Day l 1973 GO' J
<t "
> l O 40- 1
> 1 u.
O h w
O e 20-w
' o .. __
1 o , ,
O 6-10 10-2 2-6 6-10 10- 2 2-6 i PM i AM- I-PM SAMPLE INTERVAL 110-30
O rigure 5a Percen Of Total :mpit.gement for All risn vs. T re ;f ;ay
- 1974 50 -
_J p
o 40- --
t-0 53' *x, ,
- p. ..
Z W 20-o ,,
CC W --
0- ..
10- o N;
O I I V y y 2-6 6-10 10-2 2-6 6-10 10 - 2 i PM I AM l-PM SAMPLE INTE RVAL 110-31
d 80- e 8
rioure 6 l Alewife Impingement Rates vs.
Temperature g i -1974 t: *li 8
= l 1
60-1 H I z i W i f 5
W I o
n l o.
2,, 4 o. l 1
a H
l t 9 O I H I f
' I
- u. l o
i g 20- I z i
- w i O I Q" 1 W
I i
O .. .
i .
4 10 20 30 M ONT H LY MEAN TEMPERATURE -
'C O
llc-32
a
! 45< .
O ;
I i
1 riguro -
1 Emelt I mp i .n = e ne n t Eates vs.
I Temperatare
, 1 -1974 C I z 1 0 35- l 2 I i
1 l
w I a.
i 1
H I Z l W I 2 25- el y
O I z i E I 2
8 1
I O a H I O I H 15< i i
- u. '
O I i
I H
z I w I O I m '
W O.
- 5- i I
. i I --
1
" a a 15 25 35
'LY MEAN T E MPE R AT URE -
'C llc-33 O
40- a l
Q Picure B l "Of.her Forage Fir.h" Impingement i Rates vs. Tempe ra tu re z 1 -1974
> l 2 I o '
E I
I a: 30 I W i l
i t- . I 0'i I 2 l w i e
E I A i 2 20- i i
I
< l H I O . i A el O i e e 8
s 10 - ,
Z t w I O
a: I w i A e '
I
- I O- '
2'O IO lO MEAN T E MPE RATUR E
'C MONTHLY O
,1i il \Ili' ill j l1 4o. -
O -
- m&^
Hc nD os
=*tpnaO
- = .
" o "' n
- m ** m . u .g** *1- g3 o *1 s
uOdom a,S*o" ocn H - sPwnu T -
N - -
O -
M -
R -
E vo. -
P .
T -
N -
E -
M E -
a _
G -
N e -
I
_ P -
M _
I no. _
L O A T
O e -
T e -
F _
O -
2 T o. -
N - _
E - _
C R -
E -
P
- *e
- [
e
- (,
o . _ '
4 -o NO Mo
> 4@$mm23 >sC%g Em22 O Io24C~r~ <
~e tv c.
Oo
e 2.5 <
Tigure 10 Diversity of Impir.ged Fish vs.
h Month 2.0<
x w
Q E
b 1.5 <
m K
w E
O v> h W I o
w
- n. l .0 < .
v>
E w
z
- g*
w e
?
z *
/
o
= 0.5< I II
=
z .N*
u) e h
J # M A M J J S 0 N D $
MONTH llc-36
).
O rigure 11 interace Weight of Alewives vs.
Monen 40< ,
I .
m m 30< .
2
- E o
w H .
g x
0 .
. M O 5 v 20<
W e .
m .
W 10< .
M 0- - -
J- F M A- M- J J- A S O- N D
'- MONTH i
11C-37 L
i- - , - . . . - - _ _ . . . _ . . . . - . . = _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . . . . . _ _ . - . _ _ _ - -
- l f
O; t
4 30<
Tigure 12 Average Weight of Smelt
, vs . Month n
! 2 1 l E-
- l e 20<
< I W
z .
e
- ', e
- o
! W y . .
II
- 6 w 10- II e
4 e
! E e '
g m-l O , . , , . . , . . .
J F M A M J J A S 'O N D MONTH 11c-38 g l
i
i a
RGLE Report No. B-13-290
'a l
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION 2978-2983 riS" PROGRAM
SUMMARY
REPORT O Ginna Nuclear Power Station Report Prepared by Beak Consultants Incorporated i
August 1986
(]
l
b B) Summary gg I
Following is a summary of the results of the 1978-1983 fish progrsm conducted at the Ginna Nuclear Power Station.
o Gill netting efforts from January 1978 through March 1983 yielded 33,513 fish comprising 45 species in the 719 net-days sampled. Twenty-three of the species were collected in each of the complete years studied, o The greatest number of fish in gill nets during full year studie, were collected in 1980 (10,751 fish) and the fewest vere collected in 1982 (3,679 fish). .
Average catch per unit effort for the complete study h years was 46.6 fish, o The average bi om as s per net-day was 11.7 kg. Brown ;
trout contributed 41.4% of this total (4.8 kg per net-day).
l l 0 The catch per effort of all species combined was l
greatest during the spring months, generally declining through the summer and fall months.
l l
o The average monthly CPU for all species combined was generally greater at the 2m nets than at the 12m nets. This difference was usually greatest in spring O l
2
P I
O and early summer and may se relatee to a springtime inshore spawning movement for many species.
o Trap net efforts from 1978 through 1982 yielded 5126 fish comprising 23 species in the 117 net-days sampled. The greatest number of fish were collected in 1980 (2032 fish) and fewest in 1978 (234 fish).
o Electrofishing in the discharge canal yielded 2963 fish of 21 species. Electrofishing in the plume area resulted in 850 fish comprising 17 species and electrofishing on the lake proper resulted in a total of 580 fish comprising 19 species.
O
4 i
RGE REPORT NO. 3-13-058 ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1977 FISH EGG AND LARVAE PROGRAM LAKE /SCREENIlOUSE SURVEYS GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION Prepared by Bio Systems O aeseerca.
September 1978
- c-
y
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS l
An ichthyoplankton survey was conducted within the nearshore waters of Lake Ontario at Rochester Gas and Electric 's Ginna Nuclear Power Station from mid-June to early September 1977. The expressed objective was to provide a characterization of fish eggs and larvae within non-thermally influenced pelagic and benthic habitats adjacent to the site (2, 5, B, and lim stations on tran-sect W-3a), and to explore the dynamics and extent of ichthyoplank-ton cropping by intake cooling water entrainment. A summary of s
findings and conclusions is provided below.
Lake Survey
- 1. Pelagic fish eggs were spatially distributed in a non-random or patchy pattern along Transect W-3a. Since the
()
majority (81.5%) of samples collected were devoid of eggs, mean densities were based primarily on a few samples containing relatively large concentrations. The overall -
density of pelagic eggs, within the spatial and temporal confines of the 1977 Ginna Survey, was 55.4/1000m3 ,
- 2. Seasonally, most eggs occurred in samples taken between late June and late July; none were taken af ter August 8-9.
Significantly (p<.05) more eggs were collected in night ,
samples when compared to day catches during the month of July. In June, the reverse diel effect was apparent with more eggs taken during day samples at two (5 and 8m) of the four stations sampled; the seasonal difference could
{} reflect a succession of species-specific spawning behavior.
-i-
I
(} Too few eggs were present in August to assess a diel pattern.
- 3. Focusing on spatial dynamics over the entire season, egg densities were found to dif fer significantly (p<.01) with depth (bottom <mid-depth < surf ace) . Concerning stations, densities were not found to differ significantly (p<.05).
- 4. A total of 15,583 larval fish, containing representatives from nine families, ten genera and at least nine species, were collected along Transect W-3a.
- 5. Alewife was the dominant species of larvae and comprised 9C .9% of the mean seasonal catch. Other major species, O ranked in decreasing order of abundance, were goldfish /
carp (2.7%), smelt (2.6%), and johnny darter (1.8%).
- 6. The mean density of larval fish over all stations (2, 5, 8, 11m), depths (surf ace, mid-depth, and bottom) , sampling dates (seven), and times within dates (day and night), was 689.3/1000m 3,
- 7. Describing seasonal distribution, larvae densities increased greatly by late July, and peaked in early August (2259.1/
1000m3 ) . Densities declined sharply by late August, followed by a small gradual decline in early September.
O ..
-() 8. A pronounced diel distribution pattern was noted through-out the season. Larval fish, in general, were usually more abundant in tbn water column at night than during i
the day; mean seasonal night / day ratio was 2.9, with a range of 1.1-52.1. The amplitude and significance of the diel pattern interacted variously with season, stations, and depths, for different species. Only one species of k fish (yellow perch) displayed a reverse dici distribution, I i.e. more abundant during the day than at night. !
1
- 9. With regard to spatial distribution there was an obvious I
inverse relationship between larval densities and distance ;
3 from shore. Year-to-date concentrations were 1420.0/1000m at 2m, 699.2/1000m 3 at Sm, 504.0/1000m3 at 8m, and 377.8/ !
1000m3 at llm. Occasional interactions of station effects with seasons, depths, and sampling times (day-night), prompts some qualification of this generalized spatial trend when addressing individual species. There were no distinct trends or significant vertical distribution patterns among
+
the fish larvae data.
- 10. Juvenile fish were collected in increasing numbers from July 12 (0.4/1000m3 ) to September 9 (13.8/1000m3 ). The seasonal catch consisted of smelt, alewife, emerald shiner, johnny darter, spottail shiner, unidentified shiners, sculpin, and 3-spined stickleback, in decreasing order of abundance.
-iii-
1 I
(
() Intake - Screenhouse Survey
- 1. Tenporal variations in fish eggs were reasonably con-sistent between the offshore intake area and the onshore screenhouse locations.
- 2. The seasonal progression of mean fish egg abundance for intake and screenhouse locations began with low densities in June through mid-July (0-20/1000m 3), peaked abruptly in late-July (intake - 53.5/1000m , screenhouse 3
- 302.0/
3 1000m 3), and declined dramatically to < 2/1000m by early August; none appeared in late August or September.
- 3. Year-to-date mean egg densities for intake and screenhouse waters were 11.6 and 45.6/1000m 3, respectively. The greater mean for screenhouse is attributed to a large influx of eggs during one replicate, of one time period (night), in late July.
- 4. A distinct diel pattern of fish egg occurrence was noted; over the 1977 season, more than 95% of the eggs collected at intake and screenhouse were found in night samples at both locations.
- 5. There was no consistent pattern for vertical stratification of eggs at the offshore intake location.
O '
-iv-
/^g t,vj 6. A comparison of seasonal trends in fish larvae density between intake and screenhouse locations, showed some discrepancies early in the season (June and early July) when densities were low; however in late July and early August, the population increased similarly at both loca- ,
+
tions. The seasonal decline in density (late August -
early September) was much greater in the screenhouse ,
than intake area, i
- 7. Maximum larvae densities were recorded in early August; 1347.7 larvae /1000m 3
for intake location (mean based on 3
all depths, day-night, and replicates), and 1567.0/1000m for screenhouse (mean based on day-night and replicates).
l I'
i (_)\ 8. Three species of larvae dominated the seasonal catch; alewife was most abundant (91.4% - intake, 90.7% - screen-house), followed by smelt ( 3.7 and 1.9 %) , and johnny darter (2. 3 and 2.7 %) . Eleven other taxa of larvae occurred variously among intake and screenhouse locations.
- 9. A statistical analysis'of the data for alewife, smelt, johnny darter, and goldfish / carp revealed significant (p<.05) seasonal effects and season - diel interactions among all four species at the intake location; at the screenhouse, significance was noted only for alewife and l
johnny darter.
-v-l l
0
- 10. In June, mean larvae concentrations were 133.5 and 42.1/
( })
1000m 3 for intake and screenhouse, respectively. Smelt and alewife dominated the intake during mid- and late June, respectively; smelt was the only dominant identified in screenhouse. The paucity of alewife, and complete absence of five other species (including yellow perch) from screenhouse (when all were present at intake), is related to the vertical stratification of these species relative to the intake withdrawal zone; they were concen-d trated in the upper one-half of the intake water column, while the sphere of entrainment influence appears to be in the lower half.
3 11. In July, mean monthly densities were 579.3/1000m3 and 328.5/
i 1000m 3 in intake and screenhouse, respectively. The ratio of intake to screenhouse densities (I/S) decreased from 3.17 in June to 1.76 in July. Johnny darter and alewife were consecutive dominants at both locations in July. The appearance of alewife in screenhouse was related to their downward dispersion into mid- and bottom offshore intake waters, i.e. their appearance in the zone of influence.
- 12. In August, mean densities were over 3 times greater than in the previous month; intake was 814.7/1000m 3 , and screen-house was 1010.6/1000m3 . The I/S ratio was 0.81 for August.
Alewife dominated the catch; intake - 98.7% and screenhouse -
,s 96.61. Densities declined in late August, consistent with
()
observations for sampling stations along Transect W-3a.
-vi-
__ . _ . . . _ _ . _ - .= . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - - _ _ _,
4 13.. A single complete survey was conducted in early September.
Mean intake concentration declined slightly from late ^
August (246.3/1000m versus 281.7/1000m ) , whereas the 3 3 3 to screenhouse showed a marked decrease (454.2/1000m 6.6/1000m3 ). The resultant I/S ratio was 37.3. Intake catch consisted entirely of alewife (most confined to upper half of the water column); none were taken in the screenhouse. Smelt was the only species in screenhouse samples.
- 14. .A significant (p<.05) diel variation in larvae density was noted. The seasonal night-day (N/D) density ratio for intake and screenhouse was 4.6 and 11.5, respectively.
The dif ference in N/D ratios between locations is directly O attributed to lower daytime screenhouse values, relative to intake (63,l/1000m 3versus 169.2/1000m3 ) ; nighttime densities were quite similar (727.9/1000m3 for screenhouse,
-774.0/1000m 3 for intake). Direct-and/or indirect avoidance of the intake sphere of entrainment influence may account for low daytime screenhouse densities. Most species con-formed to the general diel pattern and behaved similarly.
at both locations. The exception was yellow perch; more
- i. were'taken-during the day at intake, relative to night.
Yellow perch were never observed in any screenhouse samples i
(day or night) .
O -vii-l
4
() 15. The vertical distribution of fish larvae at intake location varied among species, sampling dates, and in some instances among day-night periods. Alewife and goldfish / carp were significantly stratified (p<.05);
both displayed maximum densities in the surface waters.
Surface to bottom intake density ratios of 8.1 and 3.3 were measured for alewife during day and night, respec-tively.
- 16. A comparison of data between screenhouse and various combinations of intake depths (SMB, SM, and MB) revealed a close relationship with MB (mean of mid , bottom) during daylight periods (I/S ratio of 0.94); at night the close relationship with MB applied in only three of the four
[}
months sampled (exception being August when densities were greatest) . For seasonal nighttime entrainment pro-jections, screenhouse values are best approximated using intake SMB (mean of surface, mid , and bottom) ; I/S ratio using SMB was 1.06.
Benthic Survey
- 1. Fish eggs were present in benthic pump samples only between mid-June and late July; larvae were taken only between late June and late July. Year-to-date (mid-June to late August) mean densities for benthic eggs and larvae taken over all stations (2, 5, 8, llm, and intake) and sub-() strates were 394.7/m 2 and 14.2/m 2 , respectively. Individual
-viii-
5
() survey densities ranged from 0-2032.5/m 2 for eggs, and 0-40.5/m 2 for larvac.
- 2. At least five taxa of larvae were sampled; alewife dominated the seasonal catch (76. 8 %) , followed by johnny darter (8.5%), sculpin (5.6%), another species of darter (Etheostoma spp. , 2. 8%) , and goldfish / carp (2.1%) .
- 3. The seasonal dynamics of benthic eggs and larvae were basically identical; increasing concentrations through June, to a peak in early July, followed by a decline in late July, and a complete absence by early August.
- 4. Concerning spatial distribution, there was an interesting season-station interaction; the net effect was an apparent lakeward progression of spawning, and resultant larvae, with time.
- 5. A distinct pattern of substrate-selectivity was not _
exhibited by benthic ichthyoplankton consistently over survey dates and stations. The greatest density of eggs appeared in Cladophora at 2m on July 12 (12,008/m2) ;
however maxima at other times and stations occurred in abiotic substrates ranging from silt, sand, and graval, to mixtures. Maximum larvae were found in a silt sanple (253.3/m 2), however other maxima were noted in sand and mixtures.
-lx-
4 2
- 6. Expressing benthic egg densities (numbers /m ) as pelagic l
equivalents (numbe rs/1000m3) , and comparing these values with actual pelagic densities noted in lake tow samples, revealed that more than 99% of the nearshore fish egg resource is located on the lake bottom.
O ;
i t
O -x-
l l
RG&E REPORT NO. B-13-103 1
/
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1978 ICHTHYOPLANKTON PROGRAM LAKE /SCREENHOUSE SURVEYS GINNA NUCLEAR POh'ER STATION Data Collected and Report Prepared by:
BIO SYSTEMS RESEARCH, INC.
JUNE 1979
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS An ichthyoplankton survey was conducted within the nearshore waters of Lake Ontario at Rochester Gas and Electric's Ginna Nuclear I'ower Station from late May to mid-September 1978. The objective was to provide a char-acterization of f(sh eggs and larvae within non-thermally influenced pelagic and benthic habitats adjacent to the site (2, 5, 8, and llm stations on Transect W-3a) , and to explore the dynamics and extent of ichthyoplankton cropping by intake cooling water entrainment. A summary of findings and conclualons is provided below.
O texe server
- 1. pelagic fish eggs were collected from May 25-26 .
to August 9-10. Few eggs were collected before June 28-29. A very strong seasonal peak of 2672.8 eggs /1000m 3 (averaged over stations (2, 5, 8 Ilm),
times (day, night), and depth (surface, mid , bottom))
occurred on July 24-25, with egg densities decreasing thereafter. The seasonal density of pelagic eggs averaged over sampling dates was 401.5/1000m .
- 2. The concentration of eggs displayed diel periodicity with significantly (p1 0 05) more collected at night O
-xiii-
1 s
O on July 14, July 24-25, and August 9-10.
- 3. Spatially, the vertical distribution of eggs differed significantly on three dates: June 28-29, July 14, and August 9-10, (p1 0 05). Densities were greatest at the bottom and least at the sur-face. Significant differences in egg distribution relative to shore occurred on two dater.. On June 28-29, densities were highest at 2m and decreased lakeward out to lim. On August 9-10, densities were greatest at 5 and 8m and very low at 2 and lim.
- 4. Overall, 84.8% of the total eggs collected in the water column were viable. The percent of viable eggs was somewhat greater at the bottom than at the surface and mid-depth.
- 5. A total of 14,361 larval fish were ecliected during _
ten bi-weekly sampling periods from May 25-26 through September 20, 1978.
- 6. The total seasonal catch included representatives from eight families, at least 12 genera, with eight taxa identified to species.
- 7. Alewife was the dominant species of larvae, comprising 90.2% of the total seasonal catch. Other major species ranked in decreasing order of abundance were goldfish /
carp (4.0%), smelt (1.9%), and johnny darter (1. 6%) .
-xiv-
r The mean density of larval fish over all stations Illl 8.
(2, 5, 8, lim), depths (surface, mid-depth, and bottom) sampling dates and times (day, night) was 3 The maximum concentration at any 633.8/1000m .
' depth, station, and time was 36,731.4 larvae /
3 (bottom,2m, night of July 29): of these, 1000m 34,607.2/1000m 3 were alewife.
- 9. Larval 6ensities ir.~reased to a seasonal peak of 3 on June 2B 29, decreased slightly, 3651.6/1000m peaked again at 1493.4/100Lm on August 9-10, and then decreased in general excapt for one minor increase on September 5-6,
- 10. A diel distribution was noted throughout most of the season and was usually characterized by more larvae present at night than during the day. All major larval species were generally more abundant in nighttime collections. An exception was noted, however, on July 24-25 when significantly more larvae (mostly alewife) were taken during the day.
The cause of this anomaly remains unknown.
- 11. Larval densities were inversely related to distance from shore. Mean overall densities were 2292.3/1000m O
-xv- i l
b at 8m, i' (-
n) at 2m, 475.9/1000m at Sm, 184.8/1000m and 135.1/1000m 3
at 11m. Interactions between station location and season, depth and time occasion-ally occurred. Species differences also existed, with goldfish / carp displaying the most distinct horizontal distribution patterns.
- 12. Significant vertical distribution patterns occurred a
on only three dates for total larvae and primarily reflected alewife behavior. On July 14 and August 9-10, alewife *ere concentrated at the bottom and mid-depths, whereas on September 5-6, they were concentrated at the surface. Interactions occurred
('s between depth and station, season, and time among
()
various species.
- 13. Juvenile fish were collected sporadically from June 28-29 to September 20. The highest density was 27.3/1000m and occurred September 5-6. Species present in decreasing order of abundance were alewife, smelt, Johnny darter, sculpin and spottail shiner.
O(~%
-xvi-
r l
PA Intake - Screenhouse Survey
(_)
1
- 1. Seasonal and diel variations in fish egg abundance were very similar between the offshore intake and 4
onshore screenhouse locations.
i t
i
- 2. Seasonal averages of egg densities at the intake 3
and screenhouse were 62.1/1000m and 218.8/1000m ,
respectively. The greater average density at the screenhouse was largely due to the occurrence of a single high nighttime density on July 25.
- 3. Egg densities at both the intake and screenhouse were very low from May 25-26 to June 16, increased 3
rapidly to a peak on July 24-25 (intake-396.7/1000m ,
(al screenhouse-1850.2/1000m ) and then declined rapidly to zero by August 22-23.
- 4. Concerning diel variation, 91% of the eggs from the intake and 98.7% of the eggs f rom the screenhouse were collected at night.
- 5. Fish eggs were generally more abundant near the bottom and mid-depth regions of the offshore intake than at the surface.
- 6. Results indicate that 83.9% and 98.5 % of the eggs were viable at the intake and screenhouse, respectively.
O V
-xvii-
l .
L The percent viable was nearly twice as great at night than during the day, probably due to nocturnal alewife spawning behavior.
- 7. Seasonal larval densities at the screenhouse were slightly lower than intake densities until the period from late August to early September when the reverse occurred. In general, densities increased until a seasonal peak was reached sometime in late July to early August, and then decreased to near zero by mid-September.
- 8. Maximum daily larval density at the intake occurred on July 24-25 (780.9/1000m ), whereas maximum daily D screenhouse density occurred two weeks later on August 9-10 (461.9/1000m ) .
- 9. Alewife was the dominant larva over the entire season, comprising 85.7 % of the intake total, and 86.8% of the screenhouse total. Other important species at the intake were smelt (4.6%), johnny darter (2.1%),
EsIp spp. (1.9%) and goldfish / carp (1.5%). Additional screenhouse species were Johnny darter (4.5%) and smelt (2.3%). Eight taxa of larvae were collected at the intake and six were taken at the screenhouse.
O
-xviii-
P 4
- 10. Species succession at the intake varied, beginning with smelt dominance in May and early June, and i
I progressing to Morone spp. and smelt dominar.ec in
, mid-June. By late June, alewife was dominant, with Morone spp. and Johnny darter still common. In mid-July, alewife, johnny darter, and goldfish / carp com-prised most of the catch, and from late July through Septembbr 20, alewife and unidentifiabic clupeids were of greatest importance.
- 11. Species succession at the screenhouse began with smelt being dominant from early to mid-June. Sculpin and Morone spp. were also important in mid-June. By late June, smelt, Johnny darter and alewife comprised the bulk of the catch. Alewife and johnny darter dominated in July, whereas alewife became the only major species in August and early September. No larvae were present in screenhouse samples taken during con-current sampling of the intake and screenhouse in late May or late September.
- 12. Significantly more larvae were taken at night than during the day at both the intake and screenhouse (p1 0 001). The seasonal night / day (N/D) density ratio at the intake was 1.2:1 and at the screenhouse, 5.2:1.
The difference in ratios is attributed to low daytime llh screenhouse densities which in turn reflect direct
-xix-
( l
'_ l avoidance of the intake and/or vertical distribution differences at the intake. All major species displayed similar diel distributions at both locations.
l
- 13. Significant (p10.05) vertical stratification occurred l for alewife, Johnny darter, and goldfish / carp at the offshore intake. All three species were more concen- 'l; trated near the surface. Every major species was l usually more abundant in the surf ace waters during j
both night and day, except smelt, which was more abundant at mid-depth and bottom regions during the day.
- 14. A comparison of egg and larvae data between the n~ screenhouse and various combinations of intake depths (SMB, SM, MB and B) was attempted to refine entrain-ment estimates. Results show overly conservative estimates of daytime fish egg entrainment with B and MB data (mean intake /screenhouse (I/S) density ratios of 3.8:1 and 2.2:1 respectively); whereas at night even the greatest combination at the intake (MB) would yield an underestimate of egg cropping (I/S ratio of 0.36:1). For larvae, the use of daytime MB and B data would result in gross overestimates of entrainment (I/S ratios of 2.85:1 and 3.79:1, respectively).
During nighttime conditions, screenhouse larvae densities are best approximated by MB intake data (I/S ratio of
() 0.92:1), however a more conservative estimate is pro-duced with SMB (I/S of 1.20:1).
-XX-
h Benthic Survey lll
- 1. In an attempt to refine ichthyofauna estimates within the heterogeneous benthic environment, data for 1978 were expressed both in terms of arithmetic and weighted average densities (nunbers/m ). Weighting was based on the frequency of substrate occurrence at each sampling location and time.
- 2. The 1978 spawning season at Ginna appeared more extensive, both in duration and intensity, relative to 1977. Fish eggs were taken from late May through early August, however densities were greatest from late June through late July (in excess of 1000/m2 ).
9 3. Greatest concentrations of eggs were usually found in association with pure cladophora on boulders, or in some mixture of Cladophora with silt, sand, gravel, and cobble near shore. The maximum for any given substrate was 14,7 05. 5/m2 , which occurred in pure cladophora at 2m on June 29. Large numbers also appeared in silt at 8m on occasion.
- 4. On the average, benthic fish egg densities varied inversely with water depth. The proportion of year-to-date means among the 2,5,8, and lim stations was i
1.0:0.55:0.25:0.005, respectively.
In late June, llh 5. A season-station interaction was noted .
i e
-xxi-l
?
- - - - _ . - _ - - ~ . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ ,__,_
l L, .
I In i (_) eggs were concentrated near shore (2m), however by mid-July the center of spawning activity extended lakeward and encompassed a much greater area (2-8m). j l
l
- 6. Comparatively few eggs were ever present at the 1 Densities offshore stations (llm and intake area).
2 at lim, or 21 eggs /m at !
never exceeded 45 eggs /m the intgke.
- 7. Approximately 75% of the benthic eggs collected over all stations were viable.
9
- 8. Expressing 1978 benthic egg densities (numbers /m')
as pelagic equivalents (numbers /1000m ), and comparing the results with actual pelagic densities from lake
() tow samples, revealed that more than 99% of the near- .
shore fish egg resource was located on the lake bot-tom. This agrees with tne 1977 study results.
- 9. Concerning benthic larvae, representatives from five taxa were noted. Alewife dominated the seasonal catch (57.9-66.3%), followed by goldfish / carp (4.5-6.6%),
sculpin (3.e-3.9%), Johnny darter (2.2-3.9%), and spottail sh~.ners (0.1-0.3%).
- 10. Larvae first appeared in mid-late June, reached a maximum in mid-July, and displayed a secondary peak p
\
-xxii-
I in early August; the latter was coincident with a sizeable center of fish eggs in silt at 8m.
- 11. Spatially, the distribution of benthic larvae (mostly alewife) shifted lakeward between late June and mid-July. A similar occurrence was noted in 1977.
O O
-xxiii-l
- a
?
p a
,, ~~
RGLE REPORT NO. B-13-289
~
)
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1977-1981 ENTRAINMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
REPORT GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION t,3)
Report Prepared by Beak Corisult:nts Incorporated October 1985 u
F -
j= 7 Summery d< s 2.
Following is a summary of the re s ul ts of the 1977-1981 Entr ainment Progr am Summary Report f or GNPS, o Approximately 386,463,000 fisn eggs were entrained from 197- through 1981. The greatest annual estimated number of fish eggs were entrained in 1980 (168,052,000 eggs), and least in 1981 (14,082,000 eggs). Over 99 percent of all fish egg entrainment l occurred from April through August, j i
I o An estimated 83,975,000 fish l arva e , comprising 18 '
taxonomic groups and a number of unidentified larvac, were e nt r ained from 1977 through 1981. Alewife accounted for nearly 73 percent of the five year total. Other s pe c i e s collected included smelt (14% of the five year total) and joh nny/ te s se 11 ate d darter (11%). Most larvae e n t r a i nm e n t '
occurred from May through September.
o Alewife larval entrainment was greatest in August.
Smelt l ar v al entrainment was greatest in June and August.
Entrainment of large numbers of smelt and alewif e larvae usually I
followed a peak in fish egg entrainment.
l D Fish larvae were generally entrained in greater numbers j U o l
at night.
1 o An estimated 367,323,000 Gammarus were entrained at GNPS from 1977 through 1981. Gammarus were entrained in every month. Monthly entrainment rates were generally l ov:e s ~ in late winter and early spring and highest during the 16ce summer months. Gammarus were consistently entrained in greater numbers at night.
rm b
2
{~
l O :
, I I
l
)
l l
l l
l l
i SOCIOECONOMIC QUESTION ATTACHMENTS !
O l
l l
l l
l O
The following are answers to question #3:
' A Typical Planned Outaae 3A-1.) Length is between 35 and 45 days 2.) Occurs in March - April - May time frame every year 3.) Last typical outage was 1990 4.) Outage staffing and dose ,
Additional Dose
__ orkers W (Man-Rem) a.) Entire Outage 500 282 b.) Principal Tasks:
Refueling 15 26 Steam Generator 200 148 Modifications 100 32 Preventive & Corrective Maint 100 60 Reactor Coolant Pump Motor 10' 6.7 L.P. Turbine Overhaul 15 0 Main Transformer Overhaul 10 0 Valve Maintenance 50 10 7-
\~
- See attached sheets for more specific information on activity man-hours and dose.
5.) Outage Cost See the attached bar charts for our best estimate of outage O&M and capital expenditures.
3B ISI Outage 1.) Length is between 45 and 75 days 2.) Occurs in March-April-May time frame 3.) Last ISI outage was 1989 (20 year)
/'s
(/
i l
l
l
(]) 4.) Outage staffing and dose Additional Dosc Workers (Man-Rem) a.) Entire Outage 715 548 b.) Principal Tasks:
Refueling 15 41 Steam Generator 200 221 ISI Inspection 30 71 Modifications 250 68 Preventive & Corrective Maint 100 100 Turbine Overhaul 20 0 Valve Maintenance 100 45
- See attached sheets for more specific information on activity man-hours and dose.
5.) Outage Cost See the attached bar charts for our best estimate of cutage O&M and capital expenditures.
() 3C Longest single outace (in terms of manpower)
Same as 3D ISI outags of 1989 O
! :i li,ttili t}, ,{I, l i.
O T S
o .
C _
j,
- 4 W>/,/4!b/',// j/p;;/
?y,k, /' ' '
.?5
';A/M:'
/
.i-
. /v '
>,E'/
'/,/,,/biy/A
",E -
" ' :e '//
.y( 9 . 9 N
/' r/G5, 2
//' U 1 O _
T S -
E -
], :.b , - 1 c
s g:nf'
. l
.,4t,l,)l'/y,A/>/8A/p%'
' /A /
w;/'. ,' /::,///< m)/,M,P 1
.@9
- e r
ir
'&hl tfW/ ; 1
'l
/ !
t
.,',l 9 1
l t
u .
=?!
E D
i : * -
-m' h::,n 0
' . T d
, ? '- ,
m(1d,,)i.; ,':..'s'eyeh:;UW , 99 .- '. , I
- E )0 n
L, *, '.
G5 1 D
_ e2 U &
B 9s p9 i t
x9 d' 4, f i
r=::Y i:
9 '/ 3e E1 -
- .~
8 O 9
't 4, ne 6 1 2b M8 - S 4h
- - - L si t
&9
- :?
- i A eW 1 - -
- i. 8 U d O -
. 8 9
1 T
Cl u
A cn
- a -
n n ,
.. E: . 7 E(i i . 8 G 9 1
S f
o s
OM, Q-
- i'i
.ii 6 0 n - , 8 9 i
o - 9 1
9 l 1 l
i - ,
M - - - 4 1
0 O h 0 0 0 0 0 c 7
- 5 4 3 2 1 r a
e M
- mm i
pu O o o.-
- Ginna Station Capital Expenditures 1986-1992 l
! Millions of $
50 vO 40-U w
30-3~2:. . . .
~
- u- ==
- ::r 20- ' : : .-.- -..- ~ . * . *
. - :. : :::- :=.
- : c.-
.iE -::. a ::::. i. 1:.:?
- :.=
m Nih * .- --.
1 10- :: . . :. .y:-:: :: :::.
- ~
- ~: ,i. f.: - E .' - : ". J.
- *.~.2 .
= =- IGE :::r ::.:
0- ,
- ~
i E. .
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1988 1987 ACTUALS BUDGETED A ESE CuiMGE March 9,1990 J
_ _ . _ _ _ 2
CJ V, ,
U -
l-Nuclear Staff Complement Plan '
October 1989 - July 1991 800 / .. _ _ . . _ _ _ _. _. i __ _ . __
690 700-640 / / 595
--- 610 - -- - --/ -----i -
,, '/
O / , 545 pohtnetorer /.
600- ' contacton - - -
dont$ ton / -
-- gsg 500- / _4g9 - _ _ _ _ _ . hMyluik __ UE
' S O ~i 400- .- . . . - -
g . _, I' '
300- ? _ _ . - y .m..g _ _ - . -
% 9 jg.m u- +.
e ;
200- _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _
ET 100- E
- "%t 0
, hhW~% / i
? fib? /
c i
--lbb f Oct Jul Jul l 89 I l 90 l I 91 !
~
RG&E Employees Contractors March 26,1990
O O O 1989 OUTAGE MANPOWER Number of People on Site 1200 1000 - - - - -
\
\ .
l goo ___ _' - - - -
i 800 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
}
400 ---- - - - - - - -
200 L -
t 0 '''''''''''''''''
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I AM I PM i Time of Day PEOPLE ON SITE 1
4
o o o '
i I
Ginna Refueling Outages 1983 Through 1990 100000 g gggyp " " "
p;pnippngpmmmmmmmmmmun
" ~"" ~~" ~ " ~
umrmrq'
~
10000jjiiii -;;i;i;ii j
1000*" j 100' !
10
~
2 '
1 . . .
1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988 1989 -
1990 .
, t
, I i
! Wks 12 11 5 6 5 ! 5 10 5 !
Work Pkgs 116 87 55 73 I 30 54 85 ,
68
' Craft Dir & Indir Mh 71582 9624516516 3588825828; 30111:8537632932l Craft CM Mh 6187 15307- 3388 6613!5680'7629 9547i4224!
i i i
- Total Craf t Mh 77768 111552j19905,42502i31508 7740,94922,37156j
- [ _
E Wks M work eks.
Craf t Dir & Indir Mh Craf t CM Mh
- i MODIFICATION PROJECT
O O O GINNA STATION 6 20 89 UPDATED WEEKLY EXPOSURE FOR 1989 1
8 553.3 r 9 = = = -
_ = = 550 500 --
4N
~
N 3N :
R :
M 200 j
-m- 1989 GOAL 100 -- -*- ACTUAL
_/ . . . . . . .
DEC O _: .
JUL AUG dte OCT NOV MAR APR MAY JUN JAN FEB 1989 OUTAGE G0AL : 506 man-rem
- US:NG Om0AL DOSES FOR JAN - MAY OUTAGE MONTH OF JUNE
^
548
' m
- n. .
561 8: -
M ,,,;-
u .
A :
A S:~ -.- ESUMATE Nm --- GOAL N -
z ~
- -- ACRPL 3 ~
- ACR#1 R _
R E
"{: E m:
W :
M e _~
15 2 a-
~
~
. $[ . . . . .
% 42 $3 5/0 43 47
$7 $$ 43 45 bi $1 %T Eri 45 4'rO
O O O R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1990 OUTAGE MAN-REM MAN-REM
/
500 ' 440 fy as .. . ; g,
!ja 8 GIEd iiiLPG 400- :-M
- .=w: E S,jF %jj@ylp#7ME a : -. .
i
~=y
$ igy * " uy
& . i
- y;{1
.e W 282 300 pgua~gggdjggt: . ,$ U ESTIMATE z , ;x .
s-- m ,7 :4 m. ,
_ ymt<
ACTUAL i 3A ?- - ,
l 200-1"M 5 - -
s,t1 w 95,me+n a wf Cij Q: . ??
$ hlg.. y'y6; f;,;.
g'4~f- M !si@B-:tfjj5j
- 7 nniM:pqz 100- ;:v&$;p;C wh%n@a%Misjth
- -s RW?$ftd$d!I m;2
.6 s.1:g;%e a.
- p -t=gL
. +~ p. ,,?,4 ;; -
0- .
ESTIMATE ACTUAL
0 1989 E.W.R. ALARA TRACKING NUMBERS ALARA TRACKING DISCRIPTION ESTIMATED' ACTUAL NUMBERS MAN REM MANREM 890002 EWR:4375 - BORIC ACID FLOW 1.650 1.761 CONTROL.
890003 EWR:4675 - RHR PUMP RECIRC. 30.600 18.582 890010 EWR:4764 - CVCS TANK RM. 8.1 0.707 890011 EWR:4282 - CV RECIRC FAN COND. 1.98 2.163 COL. LEVEL.
890012 EWR 3755 - PZR DLOCK VALVE 12.6 10.012 REPLACEMENT.
890013 EWR:3072 - RCP #1 SEAL LEAK 2.26 1.521 OFF VALVES.
890014 EWR:4617 - CV HAND RAIL 6.10 2.088 LO 890015 EWR:2512 - AUX. BLDG. SEISMIC UP GRADES.
2.23 0.644 l
! 890016 EWR:4803 - RX. HEAD VENT SOL. 8.44 5.064 l
890017 EWR:2512 - CV SEISMIC UPGRADES 5.07 4.290 890018 EWR:3881 - SI PUMP RECIRC MOD. 1.45 1.803 890019 EWR:4754 - PENT. CABLE REROUTE 1.99 0.798 890020 EWR:1483 - S/G SNUBBER REP 11.CE, 61.55 10.204 890027 EWR:4218 - INST./ SAMPLE TUBING 77.00 7.988 SUPPORTS.
GRAND TOTAL 221.38 67.625 l
l 0
L98* 3EFLAELUM PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!1 PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 NUMBER 8906XX fl J
ALARA NUMBER : 890600 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING SUPPORT & MISCELLANEOUS WORK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.692 0.400 0.000 0.000 333.7 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 1.600 1.0 1.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.683 333.7 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
36 0.075 9.3 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
162 0.017 2.1 0.008 A A NUMBER : 890601 A i DESCRIPTION: REFUELING llEAD DISASSEMBLE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANiiOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.911 0.000 0.000 0.000 323.2 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 2.000 1.0 2.000 i PREDICTION RATIO - 0.956 323.2 0.003 l
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANIIOURS DOSE /MANIIOUR(MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
28 0.068 11.5 0.006 l INDIVIDUALS -
136 0.014 2.4 0.006 l
l
PROG RDMS020 (20C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!1 PAGE: 2 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 NUMBER 8906XX (G']
A1 ARA NUMBER : 890602 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING DETENSIONING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN IIANDS TEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.960 0.000 0.000 0.000 134.4 0.022 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.500 1.0 2.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.184 134.4 0.009 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANIIOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
7 0.423 19.2 0.022 INDIVIDUALS -
32 0.093 4.2 0.022 A8ANUMBER : 890603 AIMtA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING llEAD LIFT / FLOOD CAVITY MAN-REM MAH-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS TEET MANilOURS # IIOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.880 0.193 1.287 0.000 201.0 0.014 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.000 1.0 2.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.440 201.0 0.007 l
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM) i WORK PERMITS -
12 0.240 16.8 0.014 l INDIVIDUALS -
75 0.038 2.7 0.014
l PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 3 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: I/:55:53 NUMBER 8906XX ALARA NUMBER : 890605 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING FUEL S!!UFFLE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.908 1.200 0.208 0.000 1650.4 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 5.000 1.0 5.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.182 1650.4 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
108 0.055 15.3 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
516 0.011 3.2 0.003 A A NUMBER : 890606 A V.A DESCRIPTION: REFUELING llEAD REASSEMi1LE MAH-REM MAN-REM /
W11. BODY SKIN !! AN DS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
3.304 0.000 0.000 0.000 233.8 0.014 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.500 1.0 2.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.322 233.8 0.006 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
8 0.413 29.2 0.014 INDIVIDUALS -
80 0.041 2.9 0.014 O
PROGt RDMS020 (28C) ItOCilESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOli PAGE: 4 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT O!I ALARA ESTIMATE TIME 07 55 53
/3 NUMBER 8906XX
%-)
AIARA NUMDER 890607 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING DECON CAVITY (BOTTOM 10 FEET)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN llAllDS FEET MAN!!OURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.974 0.000 0.520 0.000 218.9 0.014 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.750 1.0 2.750 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.081 218.9 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAllllOURS DOS E/MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 15 0.198 14.5 0.014 I!1DIVIDU ALS -
91 0.033 2.4 0.014 AhA NUMBER : 890600 A mRA DESCRIPTION: REFUELING STUD TENSIONING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS f IlOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.863 0.000 0.000 0.000 91.5 0.031 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.100 1.0 4.100 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.698 91.5 0.000 1
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE l NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
! WORK PERMITS -
2 1.432 45.8 0.031 l
INDIVIDUALS -
28 0.102 3.3 0.031 1 ................................................................................
l l
l o
EY
PROG: IIDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ell:CTRIC CORPOPATION PAGE: 5 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 f;
v 14 UMBER 8906XX AIARA NUM11ER 890609 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!1 REFUELING Col 4O-SEAL WORK MAN-REM Mall-REH/
Wil . 110DY SKIN llANDS TEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL - 3.043 0.000 2.107 0.000 72.7 0.042 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.600 1.0 2.600 PREDICTIOli RATIO - 1.170 72.7 0.016 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE llUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
8 0.380 9.1 0.042 IllDIVI DUALS -
34 0.090 2.1 0.043 thANUMBER 890610 AFJatA DESCRIPTIO!1: REFUELING LOWER l!EAD/DRAI!1 CAVITY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FECT MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.907 0.000 1.568 0.000 254.7 0.023 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 5.000 1.0 5.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.181 254.7 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMDER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.591 25.5 0.023 INDIVIDUALS -
90 0.066 2.8 0.024 O
PROG RD!iS020 [20C) ItOCilESTER CAS & I:LECTRIC CORPoltATIOli PAGE: 6 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 NUMDI:lt 8906XX AIARA NUMBElt 890611 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!1: ItEFUELING TRANSFl:H SIOT l'I A!JGl:
MAti-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY skill llA!1DS Fl:ET MANilOUllS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.669 0.000 0.000 0.000 36.7 0.018 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 0.300 1.0 0.300 PREDICTIoll RATIO - 2.230 36.7 0.060 TOTAL AVEllAGE AVEllAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MitEM) MA!1110URS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.134 7.3 0.018 IllDIVI DUALS -
10 0.037 2.0 0.019
/hANUMDER : 890612 ALARA DESCRII' TION: RL'rUELING DECON llEAD STUDS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.224 0.000 0.000 0.000 239.3 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.500 1.0 0.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.448 239.3 0.002 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.022 23.9 0.001 INDIVIDU ALS -
60 0.004 4.0 0.001 b
1 PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ell:CTRIC CORPORATION PAGl:: 7 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 l
(] HUMIIER 8906XX !
'w ] l l
ALARA NUM131:R : 890613 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REFUELIllG CllECE l'UEL !!ANDLIllG EQUIPMENT l
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN liANDS FEET MAN!IOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.527 0.000 0.000 0.000 73.7 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.500 1.0 0.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.054 73.7 0.014 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUM11ER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
19 0.028 3.9 0.007 IllDIVI DUALS -
48 0.011 1.5 0.007 Ig'.A NUMilER : 890614 AmRA DESCRIPTIO!1: REFUELI!1G REACTOR IIEAD SilIELD (INSTALL & REMOVE)
MAN-REM MAH-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN llANDS PECT MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.930 0.000 0.000 0.000 119.0 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.600 1.0 1.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.581 119.0 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOS E/MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
6 0.155 19.8 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
36 0.026 3.3 0.008 V'
PROG RDMS020 (20C) ROCllESTER GAS & E1ECTRIC CORPORATIOli PAGE: 8
, DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:55:53 NUMBER 8906XX ALARA NUMBER : 890625 AIARA DESCRIPTIO!it REFUELING SET-UP LOWER INTER 11ALS STAND MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS $ llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL - 0.673 0.000 0.000 0.000 251.1 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.000 1.0 1.000 PREDICTION RATIO -
0.673 251.1 0.003 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
28 0.024 9.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS - 94 0.007 2.7 0.003 A A NUMBER : 890616 A o DESCRIPTION: LOWER IllTERNALS MOVEMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
3.344 0.156 0.000 0.000 284.2 0.012 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.300 8.0 0.413 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.013 35.5 0.029 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.334 28.4 0.012 INDIVIDUALS - 87 0.038 3.3 0.012 O
PROGt RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOli PAGEt 9 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 0*/855:53 liUMBER 8906XX
~~---------- GRAllD TOTALS -----------~~-------~~---------- i Mall-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY skill !!AllDS FEET MAlillOURS $ llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
40.809 1.949 5.690 0.000 4518.3 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
37.250 23.0 1.620 PREDICTIO!1 RATIO - 1.096 196.4 0.006 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAlillOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
312 0.131 14.5 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
1587 0.026 2.8 0.009 O
O
i PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44:14 l
/'\ NUMBER 8904XX U
l ALARA NUMBER : 890400 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG A&B STAGE EQUIPMI:NT, SET UP CONTROL POINTS, CON l STRUCT TENTS & WATER LANCE PLATS MAH-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS TEET MANilOURS $ llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
14.243 0.000 0.607 0.000 2211.0 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
13.000 1.0 13.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.096 2211.0 0.000 i
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE !
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
I WORX PERMITS -
186 0.077 11.9 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
876 0.016 2.5 0.006 A % NUMBER : 890401 AL.dA DESCRIPTION: SG A REMOVE MANWAY COVERS AND INSERTS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.985 0.000 0.860 0.000 22.4 0.044 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.660 10.0 0.066 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.492 2.2 0.667 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.246 5.6 0.044 INDIVIDUALS -
9 0.309 2.5 0.044 O
\
PROG: RDMS020 [280) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOli PAGE: 2 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44:14 ilUMBER 8904XX ALARA liUMBER : 890402 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!1: SG A IllITI AL RADI ATIOli SURVEY Mali-REM Mall-REH/
Wil . BODY skill liA!1DS FECT MA!11100RS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.575 0.000 1.340 0.000 4.0 0.144 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 0.060 1.0 0.060 PREDICTIOli RATIO - 9.583 4.0 2.400 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE liUMBER DOSES (MREM) MA111 TOURS DOSE /MA!11100R (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.192 1.3 0.148 IllDIVIDUALS -
2 0.288 2.0 0.144 AhAliUMBER : 890403 Af:hRA DESCRIPTION: SG A NOZZLE DAM IllSTALLATIOli A!1D SUPPORT WORK Mall-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS TEET MAN!!OURS # !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.445 0.000 6.667 0.000 19.0 0.287 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 4.000 1.0 4.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.361 19.0 0.072 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 1.089 3.8 0.287 INDIVIDUALS -
13 0.419 1.5 0.279 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTI(IC CORPORATIO!1 PAGE: 3 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON A1 ARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44:14 NUMBER 8904XX A1 ARA NUMBER : 890404 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG A INSTALL EDDY CURREllT EQUIP AND EC IllSPECTION MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN llAllDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
11.909 0.000 22.621 0.000 229.4 0.052 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
11.710 3.6 3.253 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.017 63.7 0.016 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMilER DOSES (HREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 57 0.209 4.0 0.052 IllDIVIDUALS -
111 0.107 2.1 0.051 A A NUMBER : 890405 Ab DESCRIPTION: SG A REMOVE ALL EQUIP FROM CllA!111EL llEAD, FINAL QC INSPECTION, INSTALL INSERTS AND MANWAY COVERS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
W11. BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.760 0.000 4.198 0.000 81.4 0.058 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 1.0 4.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.058 81.4 0.013 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
24 0.198 3.4 0.058 INDIVIDUALS -
35 0.136 2.3 0.059 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 4 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44:14 O NUMBER 8904XX (G
ALARA NUMBER : 890406 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG A INSTALLATION OF CE MECilANICAL PLUGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . DODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
10.260 0.000 20.358 0.000 160.9 0.064 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.320 0.1 13.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 7.773 1609.0 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN 110URS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
17 0.604 9.5 0.064 INDIVIDUALS -
45 0.228 3.6 0.063 I A NUMBER t 890407 l A ,IA DESCRIPTION: C.E. SLEEVING SG A i
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS i ACTUAL TOTAL -
38.515 0.800 78.397 0.000 2255.9 0.017 I ESTIMATED TOTAL -
12.600 3.5 3.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.057 644.5 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE / MAN}{OUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
134 0.287 16.8 0.017 INDIVIDUALS -
582 0.066 3.9 0.017 O
l l
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 5 )
DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44:14 i NUMBER 8904XX
( l ALARA NUMBER : 890408 ALARA DESCRIPTION: UNPLUG C. E. MECilANICAL PLUGS SG A i l
l l
MAN-REM Mall-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIH llANDS TEET MANHOURS # llOURS j ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.120 0.000 2.555 0.000 28.4 0.039 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.960 0.3 3.200 I PREDICTION RATIO - 1.167 94.7 0.012 l l
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE )
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM) j WORK PERMITS -
8 0.140 3.6 0.039 IllDIVIDUALS -
9 0.124 3.2 0.039 l
AhANUMBER : 890409 i
ALKRA DESCRIPTION: SG A STABILIZING SENTINEL PLUG AREA _,(2 MAN REM LIMIT BUT NO INDIVIDUAL REMOVED DURING TASK)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MAllllOURS # IIOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.275 0.000 3.076 0.000 23.8 0.054 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 0.880 0.1 8.800 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.449 238.0 0.006 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MisN!!OURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.255 4.8 0.053 INDIVIDUALS -
8 0.159 3.0 0.053 v
ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!1 PAGE: 6 PROG: RDMS020 (28C) i DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT 011 AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:44 14 NUMBER 8904XX ALARA NUMBER t 890410 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!11 SG A EXPLOSIVE PLUG REMOVAL AND WELD IN INCollEL PL UGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FEET MA111100RS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL - 6.025 0.000 11.931 0.000 127.4 0.047 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 4.140 1.0 4.140 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.455 127.4 0.011 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DCSES (MREM) MAllllOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
18 0.335 7.1 0.047 IllDIVIDUALS - 30 0.201 4.2 0.048 A A NUMBER 890411 ADA 1A DESCRIPTION: SG A&B DRESSING AND UNDRESSING, SUPPORT WORK ONLY, AND ENTRY TO CONTROL POlliTS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANIIOURS $ llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
27.098 0.570 2.687 0.000 10192.4 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
18.750 1.0 18.750 FREDICTION RATIO - 1.445 10192.4 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
112 0.242 91.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
3227 0.008 3.2 0.003 O
PROG RDMS020 [200) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC ColtPORATIoli PAGl: 7 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA 1:STIMATI: Til:11 07:44 14
( llUM11ER 8904XX
-~~-~~~----------------~~------- GRAllD TOTALS --------------------------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . 130DY SKIN IIAllDS l'EET MAlll!OURS # ll0URS ACTUAL TOTAL -
122.210 1.370 155.297 0.000 15356.0 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
72.580 23.6 3.075 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.684 650.7 0.003 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGl:
NUMI3ER DOSES (MREM) MAllll0UllS D0di /MAltllOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
573 0.213 26.8 0.008 INDIVIDUALS - 4947 0.025 3.1 0.000 l
l O ;
O I
l l
j PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER 8905XX
]v ALARA HUMBER : 890501 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG B REMOVE MANWAY COVERS AND IllSERTS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SEIN llANDS FECT MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.805 0.000 0.398 0.000 33.0 0.024 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.600 10.0 0.060 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.342 3.3 0.400 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.201 8.3 0.024 INDIVIDUALS -
10 0.081 3.3 0.025 A A NUMBER : 890502 AL, (A DESCRIPTION: SG B INITIAL RADIATION SURVEY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.200 0.000 0.163 0.000 3.2 0.063 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.050 1.0 0.050 PREDICTION RATIO - 4.000 3.2 1.260 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANiiOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.067 1.1 0.061 INDIVIDUALS -
2 0.100 1.6 0.063
' PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 2 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER 8905XX AIARA NUMBER : 890503 A1 ARA DESCRIPTIO!1: SG B NOZZLE DAM INSTALIATION AND SUPPORT WORK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL - 3.045 0.000 3.280 0.000 120.7 0.025 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.000 1.0 3.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.015 120.7 0.008 TOTAL AVERAGE MERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAllllOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
11 0.277 11.0 0.025 INDIVIDUALS - 39 0.078 3.1 0.025 A : 890504 Ah (A NUMBER A DESCRIPTION: INSTALL EDDY CURRENT EQUIP AND E. C. INSPECTION SG B MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN llANDS FECT MANilOURS # IIOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
9.120 0.000 13.273 0.000 190.3 0.048 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
6.730 3.6 1.869 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.355 52.9 0.026 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
52 0.175 3.7 0.047 INDIVIDUALS -
81 0.113 2.3 0.049 O
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!1 PAGCt 3 DATE 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER b905XX AIARA NUMBER : 890505 AIARA DESCRIPTION: SG B REMOVE ALL EQUIP FPOM CllAll!1EL llEAD, FINAL QC I NS PECTI O!1, INSTALL INSERTS AND MANWAY COVERS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.135 0.000 4.136 0.000 52.2 0.079 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
7.000 1.0 7.000 PREDICTIO!1 RATIO - 0.591 52.2 0.011 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MRLM) MANilOURS DOS E/ MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.827 10.4 0.080 INDIVIDUALS -
15 0.276 3.5 0.079 A A NUMBER 890506 APA DESCRIPTION! SG B C. E. BLEEVING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MA11110URS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
54.160 0.000 93.651 0.000 1344.4 0.040 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
15.500 8.7 1.791 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.476 154.5 0.022 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
49 1.105 27.4 0.040 INDIVIDUALS -
324 0.167 4.1 0.041 O
PROG EDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 4 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER 8905XX (J)
L ALARA NUMBER : 890507 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG B EXPIASIVE PLUG REMOVAL AND WELD IN INCONEL PLUGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS TEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.850 0.000 3.246 0.000 27.3 0.104 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.145 7.0 0.306 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.329 3.9 0.340 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
7 0.407 3.9 0.104 INDIVIDUALS -
11 0.259 2.5 0.104 AhANUMBER : 890508 AIARA DESCRIPTION: SG B INSTALLATION OF C. E. MECllANICAL PLUGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANllOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
8.730 0.000 33.1J3 0.000 207.9 0.042 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.360 0.2 1.800 PREDICTION RATIO - 24.250 3039.5 0.023 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
9 0.970 23.1 0.042 INDIVIDUALS -
52 0.168 4.0 0.042 4
O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 5 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 g NUMBER 8905XX ALARA NUMBER : 890510 ALARA DESCRIPTION: }!ECH PLUG REMOVAL EDM PROCESS SG B MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
7.340 0.000 11.033 0.000 160.8 0.046 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.305 0.8 1.631 PREDICTION RATIO - 5.625 201.0 0.028 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
26 0.282 6.2 0.045 INDIVIDUALS -
46 0.160 3.5 0.046 n
A( % NUMBER : 890511
' AIX,:A DESCRIPTION: SG B UNPLUG C. E. MECH PLUGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHbURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTA.*la -
3.540 0.000 7.017 0.000 72.3 0.049 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.960 0.5 1.920 PREDICTION I'tATIO - 3.688 144.6 0.026 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
7 0.506 10.3 0.049 INDIVIDUALS -
25 0.142 2.9 0.049 L)
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 6 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER 8905XX ALARA NUMBER : 890512 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SG B DRILL OUT STUCK MANWAY STUD MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL 0.945 0.000 1.086 0.000 18.5 0.051 ESTIMATED TOT *i 0.190 0.8 0.238 PROIr'"9N RA'. -
4.974 23.1 0.214 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE 1R'MB5 DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
J 0.315 6.2 0.051 INDIVIDUALS -
6 0.158 3.1 0.051 Abd NUMBER : 890513 ArmRA DESCRIPTION: SG B STABILIZING SENTINEL PLUG AREA _(2 MAN REM LIMIT BUT NO MAN REMOVED DURING TASK PERFORMANCE)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.570 0.000 2.169 0.000 18.4 0.085 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.456 0.1 4.560 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.443 184.0 0.019 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 1.570 18.4 0.085 INDIVIDUALS -
4 0.393 4.6 0.085 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC C:RPORATION PAGE: 7 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMF.'E TIME: 07:51:28 NUMBER 8905XX ALARA NUMBER : 890514 ALARA DESCRIPTION: B S/G ENVIRONMENTAL LEDGE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.390 0.000 3.017 0.000 38.1 0.063 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.400 1.0 2.400 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.996 38.1 0.026 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DCSE/MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
13 0.184 2.9 0.063 INDIVIDUALS -
5 0.478 7.6 0.063
GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
O MAN-F# '4 MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
98.830 0.000 155.602 0.000 2287.1 0.043 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
40.776 35.7 1.142 PREDICTION RATIO - 2.424 64.1 0.038 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
190 0.520 12.0 0.043 INDIVIDUALS -
620 0.159 3.7 0.043 O
k b b PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 I DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890001 ALARA DESCRIPTION: CCW,SFP,NON-REG,AND RHR HEAT EXCHANGER INSPECTION AND REFURBISHMENT.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
20.437 0.154 3.380 0.000 2938.8 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
38.780 330.0 0.118 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.527 8.9 0.059 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
229 0.089 12.8 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
994 0.021 3.0 0.007 A f p NUMBER : 890002 A hau\ DESCRIPTION: BORIC ACID FLOW CONTROL (EWR 4375)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.761 0.000 0.000 0.000 910.3 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.650 168.0 0.010 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.067 5.4 0.200 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
148 0.012 6.2 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
399 0.004 2.3 0.002
= GwR TEAc u p c n 's tho i v7. MAc pWe y 3, O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 2 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890003 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-4675_RHR PUMP RECIRC.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
18.582 0.120 0.000 0.000 3912.5 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
30.600 1430.0 0.021 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.607 2.7 0.238 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
332 0.056 11.8 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
1360 0.014 2.9 0.005 A h A NUMBER : 890004 ALRA DESCRIPTION: SPENT FUEL INSPECTION PROJ.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.585 0.000 0.000 0.000 686.9 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.450 450.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.300 1.5 1.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
24 0.024 28.6 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
174 0.003 3.9 0.001 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 3 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIIGTE TIME: 07:23:49 g NUMBER 89XXXX
'~
ALARA NUMBER : 890005 ALARA DESCRIPTION: MOVATS INSPECTION AND REFURBISHMENT (CONTAINMENT)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
34.743 0.045 8.436 0.000 2825.9 0.012 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 19.220 344.0 0.056 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.808 8.2 0.214 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE -
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
291 0.119 9.7 0.012 INDIVIDUALS -
1185 0.029 2.4 0.012 A NUMBER : 890006 A DESCRIPTION: MOVATS INSPECTION AND REFURBISHMENT (AUX / INT)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
25.696 0.150 0.330 0.000 3145.2 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
15.300 441.0 0.035 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.679 7.1 0.229 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
249 0.103 12.6 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
1651 0.016 1.9 0.008 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 4 i DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890007 ALARA DESCRIPTION: A AND B RHR PUMP AND MOTOR REWORK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
8.047 2.629 0.114 0.000 823.1 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.800 360.0 0.013 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.676 2.3 0.769 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
68 0.118 12.1 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
352 0.023 2.3 0.010 AOA NUMBER : 890008 AhMA DESCRIPTION: SEAT LEAKAGE TEST OF LETDOWN ORIFICES STOP VALVES MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.695 0.000 0.000 0.000 47.5 0.057 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.170 30.0 0.072 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.242 1.6 0.792 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.270 4.8 0.056 INDIVIDUALS -
21 0.128 2.3 0.056 O
PROG: RDMS020 {28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 5 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890009 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RTD REPLACEMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.7 0.023 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.600 1.0 0.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.217 5.7 0.038 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.065 2.9 0.022 INDIVIDUALS -
4 0.033 1.4 0.024 A I',A NUMBER : 890010 AL.A DESCRIPTION: TANK ROOM CVCS EWR-4764 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN MANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.707 0.000 0.000 0.000 171.6 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
8.100 270.0 0.030 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.087 0.6 0.133 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
25 0.028 6.9 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
89 0.008 1.9 0.004 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 6 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX
()A
\,
ALARA NUMBER : 890011 ALARA DESCRIPTION: C.V. RECIRC FAN COND. COL. LEV (EWR 4282)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.163 0.000 0.000 0.000 549.7 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.980 368.0 0.005 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.092 1.5 0.800 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
50 0.043 11.0 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
169 0.013 3.3 G.004 A 4 NUMBER : 890012
, A . DESCRIPTION: PZR BLOCK VALVE REPLACEMENT (EWR 3755) l MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
10.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 1015.6 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
12.600 368.0 0.034 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.795 2.8 0.294 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
122 0.082 8.3 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
359 0.028 2.8 0.010 l
l O
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 7 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 (3 NUMBER 89XXXX
\_)
ALARA NUMBER : 890013 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RCP #1 SEAL LEAKOFF VALVES (EWR 3072)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.521 0.000 0.000 0.000 214.1 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.620 134.0 0.020 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.581 1.6 0.3S0 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
17 0.089 12.6 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
67 0.023 3.2 0.007 AgANUMBER : 890014 AuPLTtA DESCRIPTION: C.V. HANDRAIL (EWR 4617)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 1278.0 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
6.100 1896.0 0.003 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.342 0.7 0.667 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
63 0.033 20.3 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
282 0.007 4.5 0.002 U
PROG: RDMS020 {28C] ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 8 DATE 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 A NUMBER 89XXXX V
ALARA NUMBER : 890015 ALARA DESCRIPTION: AUX BLDG SEISMIC UPGRADES (EWR 2512)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
'WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.644 0.000 0.000 0.000 1093.8 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.230 1489.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.289 0.7 1.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK DERMITS -
140 0.005 7.8 0.001 INDIV1bOALS' -
449 0.001 2.4 0.000
'A 9 NUMBER : 890016 Ah.dA DESCRIPTION: RX HEAD VENT SOLENOIDS (EWR 4803)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN- HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.064 0.000 0.000 0.000 266.2 0.019
' ESTIMATED TOTAL - 8.440 120.0 0.070 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.600 2.2 0.271 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
21 0.241 12.7 0.019 INDIVIDUALS -
87 0.058 3.1- 0.019 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 9 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 f']
\.s NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890017 ALARA DESCRIPTION: C.V. SEISMIC UPGRADES (EWR 2512)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WII . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.290 0.024 0.000 0.000 2042.6 0.002 .
ESTIMATED TOTAL -
5.070 1097.0 0.005 l PREDICTION RATIO - 0.846 1.9 0.400 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
118 0.036 17.3 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
602 0.007 3.4 0.002 l
l l
A g A NUMBER : 890018 l AEPfEA DESCRIPTION: SI PUMP RECIRC MOD (EWR 3881) l l
l MAN-REM MAN-REM / ;
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.803 0.000 0.000 0.000 1827.5 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.450 700.0 0.002 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.243 2.6 0.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
144 0.013 12.7 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
648 0.003 2.8 0.001 v
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 10 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890019 ALARA DESCRIPTION: PENETRATION CABLE REROUTE (EWR 4754)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.798 0.000 0.000 0.000 529.0 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.990 459.0 0.004 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.401 1.2 0.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
67 0.012 7.9 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
199 0.004 2.7 0.001 AO NUMBER : 890020 Ab-a DESCRIPTION: SG SNUBBER REPLACEMENT (EWR 1483)
HAD ALARA NO 880008 BEFORE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
10.204 0.180 0.000 0.000 1520.9 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
61.550 2063.0 0.030 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.166 0.7 0.233 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
51 0.200 29.8 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
439 0.023 3.5 0.007 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 11 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 690022 ALARA DESCRIPTION: AUX BLDG TOP LVL REPLACE BOLT ON TRANSFER TUBE GATE VALVE LOCATED IN SLOT AREA MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.055 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.6 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.000 2.0 0.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.055 8.3 0.006 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 0.055 16.6 0.003
-INDIVIDUALS -
7 0.008 2.4 0.003 AO_A NUMBER : 890023 l AIajA DESCRIPTION: REMOVE AND REPLACE PZR MANWAY l
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS-ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.680 0.000 0.000 0.000 76.4 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.600 12.0 0.050 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.133- 6.4 0.180 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
- _ WORK PERMITS -
13 0.052 5.9 0.009 l INDIVIDUALS -
53 0.013 1.4 0.009
-- s c.---_--.-----_.--------.__ .--_--_-_-------_--------_-_--------_---_----.
~
O l
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 12 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49
(')
v NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890024 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RCP A AND B OIL CHANGE, FLYWHEEL, AND UPPER SHOE ADJUSTMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.847 0.000 0.000 0.000 232.4 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.550 375.0 0.007 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.724 0.6 1.143 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
32 0.058 7.3 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
113 0.016 2.1 0.008 A A NUMBER : 890025 A4 DESCRIPTION: ECCD PROJECT (CONTAINMENT)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.810 0.090 0.000 0.000 692.3 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.287 246.0 0.005 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.406 2.8 0.600 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS WORK PERMITS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) 58 0.031 11.9 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
181 0.010 3.8 0.003
. PROG: RDMS020 (28C) . ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 13 4
-DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49
(]; NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890026 ALARA DESCRIPTION: ECCD PROJECT (AUX / INT BUILDINGS)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.298 0.000 0.000 0.000 660.0 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.392 492.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.760 1.3 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANIIOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
51 0.006 12.9 0.000
-INDIVIDUALS -
309 0.001 2.1 0.000 AOANUMBER : 890027 Alic.4A DESCRIPTION: EWR 4218 INST / SAMPLE TUBING SUPPORTS FOR LEVEL TRANSMITTERS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
7.988 0.000 0.000 0.000 1383.5 0.006
-ESTIMATED TOTAL -
77.000 3746.0 0.021 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.104 0.4 0.286 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
60 0.133 23.1 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
414 0.019 3.3 0.006 O
PRC,G : RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 14 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 f') :
NUM9ER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890029 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EQ VALVE WALKDOWN MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN MANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.108 0.000 0.000 0.000 19.4 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.300 15.0 0.020 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.360 1.3 0.300 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
6 0.018 3.2 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
8 0.014 2.4 0.006 A8ANUMBER : 890030 AlTRA DESCRIPTION: HIGH RAD FILTER WORK.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.953 0.000 0.503 0.000 186.3 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.500 1.0 1.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.302 186.3 0.007 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
30 0.065 6.2 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
128 0.015 1.5 0.010 L_]
PROGt RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 15 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890031 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SPECIAL TASK PER PROCEDURE ST-89.1 !
1 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS :
' ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.735 0.000 0.000 0.000 45.4 0.016 l ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.210 10.0 0.021 '
PREDICTION RATIO - 3.500 4.5 0.762 1 1
I TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE l NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) {
WORK PERMITS -
9 0.082 5.0 0.016 1 INDIVIDUALS -
19 0.039 2.4 0.016 A ,A NUMBER : 890032 Ah.itA DESCRIPTION: THERMOCOUPLE REPAIRS (6 TO 8)ON REACTOR HEAD MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.384 0.000 0.000 0.000 43.2 0.055 ESTIMATED. TOTAL -
4.300 10.0 0.430 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.554 4.3 0.128 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.795 14.4 0.055 INDIVIDUALS. -
16 0.149 2.7 0.055 O
RDMS020 ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 16 PROG [28C)
DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 0 '. 23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890041 ALARA DESCRIPTION: 10 YEAR ISI WORK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
6.113 2.867 0.808 0.000 1879.4 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.100 676.0 0.005 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.972 2.8 0.600 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
64 0.096 29.4 0.003 INDIVIDUALS - 464 0.013 4.1 0.003 A ) NUMBER : 890G42 AhsRA DESCRIPTION: ISI IN AUXILIARY BUILDING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.521 0.000 0.000 0.000 1154.0 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.900 40.0 0.023 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.690 28.9 0.043 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
112 0.014 10.3 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
309 0.005 3.7 0.001 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 17 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 ;
NUMBER 89XXXX
)
ALARA NUMBER : 890043 I ALARA DESCRIPTION: ISI IN CONTAINMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
29.001 0.060 0.546 0.000 3489.6 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
7.758 140.0 0.055 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.738 24.9 0.145 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANIIOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
277 0.105 12.6 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
1125 0.026 3.1 0.008 l
A'hANUMBER : 890044 A M UN DESCRIPTION: SAND BOX REMOVAL FOR ISI SUPPORT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.573 0.000 0.000 0.000 95.9 0.016 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.400 4.0 0.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.655 24.0 0.027 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
13 0.121 7.4 0.016 INDIVIDUALS -
55 0.029 1.7 0.017
(~\,
q ,)
PROGt RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 18 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 g NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890045 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RESIN TRANSFER AND SHIPMENT ONLY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.955 0.000 0.744 0.000 70.1 0.014 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.900 1.0 0.900 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.061 70.1 0.016 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE s.VERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.239 17.5 0.014 INDIVIDUALS -
27 0.035 2.6 0.013 A A NUMBER : 890046 A DESCRIPTION: DECONTAMINATION AND PAINTING AUX BLDG MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.524 0.060 0.000 0.000 1294.6 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.830 2800.0 0.002 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.523 0.5 1.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
54 0.047 24.0 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
1268 0.002 1.0 0.002 p .
w
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 19 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 l DATE: 90/05/18 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890047 ALARA DESCRIPTION: LT 426 REPAIR AND CALIBRATION MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.827 0.115 0.000 0.000 294.6 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.341 14.0 0.167 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.208 21.0 0.060 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
22 0.129 13.4 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
194 0.015 1.5 0.010 A O A NUMBER : 890048 AfudA DESCRIPTION: HIGli RAD WASTE DISPOSAL MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.387 0.000 3.085 0.000 299.0 0.018 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
7.300 20.0 0.365 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.738 15.0 0.049 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
20 0.269 15.0 0.018 INDIVIDUALS -
86 0.063 3.5 0.018 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 20 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 (3 NUMBER 89XXXX
%.)
ALARA NUMBER : 890049 ALARA DESCRIPTION: A S/G BLOWDOWN LINE LEAK REPAIR MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.637 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.8 0.282 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.200 1.0 2.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.744 5.8 0.128 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.4C9 1.5 0.273 INDIVIDUALS -
31 0.149 0.5 0.298 A h NUMBER : 890050 AIMtA DESCRIPTION: SPEN 7' FUEL TRANSFER CANAL REFURBISHMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.000 10.0 0.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.000 0.0 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 0.000 0.0 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
0 0.000 0.0 0.000
\
O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 21 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX (O')
l ALARA NUMBER : 890051 l ALARA DESCRIPTION: DI VAULT VISUAL INSPECTION USING ROBOT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.191 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.9 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.900 10.0 0.090 l PREDICTION RATIO - 0.212 1.9 0.111 l TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE !
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
2 0.096 9.5 0.010 i INDIVIDUALS -
6 0.032 3.2 0.010 ;
l i
1 A A NUMBER : 890052 AL..dA DESCRIPTION: CONTAINMENT ENTRY FOR INSPECTION, WORK AT POWER i
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.857 0.161 0.000 0.000 30,7 0.028 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.250 1.0 1.250 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.686 30.7 0.022 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.286 10.2 0.028 INDIVIDUALS -
16 0.054 1.9 0.028 i
\/
- ~ _ ._-. - - ~ . _ _ . - .- . . ~. . --
PROG: RDMS020 [28C)- ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 22 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890053 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RESIN TRANSFER AND SHIPMENT ONLY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.720 0.000 0.000 0.000 111.2 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.125 20.0 0.056 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.640 5.6 0.107 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.144 22.2 -
0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
37 0.019 3.0 0.006 Ah_.ANUMBER : 890056 A bitA DESCRIPTION: -REPLACEMENT OF #B' RHR HXR DRAIN LINE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TGTAL -
0.070 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.9 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.350 9.0 0.150 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.052 0.9 0.060 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE-NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 0.070 -7.9 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
4 0.018 2.0 0.009
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTP.IC CORPORATION PAGE: 23 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 i NUMBER 89XXXX (v) ;
ALARA NUMBER : 890080 AIARA DESCRIPTION: PT'S IN CONTAINMENT, ACCUMULATOR & FAN CONDENSATE SAMPLES.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
3.611 0.166 0.000 0.000 352.5 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.000 100.0 0.010 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.611 3.5 1.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
23 0.157 15.3 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
124 0.029 2.8 0.010
'A NUMBER : 890081 As DESCRIPTION: PUMP OUT THE CONTAINMENT SUMPS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.555 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.6 0.121 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.000 50.0 0.060 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.185 0.1 2.017 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.278 2.3 0.121 INDIVIDUALS -
3 0.185 1.5 0.123 b
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCilESTER CAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 24 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890082 AIAD. DESCRIPTION: INSPECT SNUBBERS AND OTHER COMPONENTS IN CONTAINMENT.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN MANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.051 0.168 0.000 0.000 149.5 0.027 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.000 50.0 0.060 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.350 3.0 0.450 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
9 0.450 16.6 0.027 INDIVIDUALS -
103 0.039 1.5 0.026 NUMBER : 890090 A
A114R C AA DESCRIPTION: WORK ON TRANSMITTERS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.574 0.007 0.000 0.000 252.5 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.600 1.0 2.600 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.605 252.5 0.002 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
51 0.031 5.0 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
117 0.013 2.2 0.006 O
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 25 DATE:'^
90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX (d
\
ALARA NUMBER : 890091 ALARA DESCRIPTION: CHARGING PUMP UORK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.132 0.000 0.000 0.000 180.4 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.700 1.0 0.700 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.189 180.4 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
31 0.004 5.8 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
70 0.002 2.6 0.001 l A A NUMBER : 890092 lA (A DESCRIPTION: DECON WORK NOT COVER BY ANOTHER JOB
' MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
36.224 0.250 1.540 0.000 1456.9 0.025 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
11.500 1.0 11.500
, PREDICTION RATIO - 3.150 1456.9 0.002 l
TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE l NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
144 0.252 10.1 0.025 l INDIVIDUALS -
8694 0.004 0.2 0.020 V
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 26 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 g 11 UMBER 89XXXX AIARA NUMBER : 890093 AINth DESCRIPTION: RAD-WASTE WORK (NOT RESIN S}{IPMENTb).
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKI': IIANDS FEET MANIIOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
15.000 0.000 0.064 0.000 461.5 0.033 EST7. MATED TOTAL -
8.000 1.0 8.000 PR2 DICTION RATIO - 1.075 461.5 0.004
~ /"A L AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE 1 .JER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
40 0.375 11.5 0.033 INDIVIDUALS -
3702 0.004 0.1 0.040 A NUMBER : 890094 Ih:A ADDI DESCRIPTION: WORK ON RADIATION DETECTORS tiAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS # l{OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.727 0.000 0.000 0.000 184.6 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.400 1.0 0.400 L
PREDICTION RATIO - 1.818 184.6 0.010 TOTAL AVERACE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANllOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
21 0.035 8.8 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
044 0.001 0.2 0.005
l PROG: RDhdO20 (28C) ROCilESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO11 PAGE: 27 DATER 90/Ofs 1' REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890095 ALARA DESCRIPTION: PT'S NOT Ill CONTAINMENT.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
3.914 0.289 0.000 0.000 165.4 0.024 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.500 1.0 3.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.118 165.4 0.007 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS JSE/MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
19 0.206 8.7 0.024 INDIVIDUALS -
1026 0.004 0.2 0.020 A A HUMBER : 890096 AbuA DESCRIPTION: TRAS!!
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.381 0.000 0.000 0.000 201.5 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.400 1.0 0.400 PREDICTION RATIO - ').453 201.5 0.018 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE / MAN 110UR(MREM)
WCRK PERMITS -
17 0.081 11.9 0.007 IND. 'IDUALS -
614 0.002 0.3 0.007 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTPIC CORPORATION PAGE: 28 DATE: 90/05/10 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 g NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890097 ALARA DESCRIPTION: MISCELLANEOUS VALVE WORK IN CONTAINME!4T VESSEL.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANIIOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
7.430 0.027 0.413 0.000 759.9 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.200 1.0 2.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.377 759.9 0.005 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
114 0.065 6.7 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
499 0.015 1.5 0.010 A A NUMBER : 890098 AL RA DESCRIPTI^N: MISCELLANEOUS VALVE WORK IN AUXILIARY &
INTERMEDIATE DUILDINGS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN llANDS TECT MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.505 0.012 0.000 0.000 1356.9 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.300 1.0 1.300 PREDICTION RATIO - 3.465 1356.9 0.002 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANIIOURS DOS E/MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
273 0.017 5.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
762 0.006 1.8 0.003 n
l G l
1 l
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 29 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890099 ALARA DESCRIPTION: PAINTING - NOT COVERED UNDER ANOTilER JOB.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN !!A!1DS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.276 0.353 0.319 0.000 246.0 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.200 1.0 0.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 6.380 246.0 0.025 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE HUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANiiOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
32 0.040 7.7 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
86 0.015 2.9 0.005 A 'A NUMBER : 890100 AL. G DESCRIPTION: S/G WORK ASSOCIATED WITH OR CAUSED BY B S/G LEAK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANIIOURS # ll0URS ACTUAL TOTAL -
26.196 0.000 32.121 0.000 622.3 0.042 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.000 50000.0 0.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 196.000 0.0 42.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
53 0.494 11.7 0.042 INDIVIDUALS -
233 0.112 2.7 0.041
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 30 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890200 ALARA DESCRIPTION: P&ID AUX & INTERMEDIATE BUILDINGS ,
TilIS liAD ALARA NUMBER 880044 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.392 0.000 0.000 0.000 496.5 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.700 500.0 0.005 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.627 1.0 1.800 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANiiOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
159 0.028 3.1 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
268 0.016 1.9 0.008
..___ . . ~. . .__. .__..... __.. __.. ... ___ . __ ... _____.. ___...__ .__..
AOA NUMBER : 890201 AkalA DESCRIPTION: P&ID CONTAINMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
'~
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
12.271 1.739 0.000 0.000 1343.2 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL .
8.913 18.3 0.487 l- PREDICTION RATIO - 1.377 73.4 0.018 l TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
76 0.161 17.7 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
1512 0.008 0.9 0.009 O .
l l
1
. _.. , , _ . , _ _ , _ . . _ . ~ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .. _ . . . _ . . . . . . _ _ _ . _ ,
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 31 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME; 07:23:49 I
DATE: 90/05/18 ITUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890301 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SI REPAIR IN CO!1TAINMENT ONLY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN IIAllDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.805 0.000 0.000 0.000 82.3 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.900 30.0 0.030 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.894 2.7 0.333 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.268 27.4 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
40 0.020 2.1 0.010 A A NUMBER : 890302 A 'T DESCRIPTION: AOV 700 REPAIR MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 23.4 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.100 10.0 0.010 PREDICTION RATIr - 0.500 2.3 0.200 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 0.050 23.4 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
3 0.017 7.8 0.002 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 32 DATE: 90/05/18 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 07:23:49 NUMBER 89XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 890304 ALARA DESCRIPTION: INSTALLATION OF ORIFICE PLATES IN S.I. LINES OVER B AND C S.I. PUMPS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANiiOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.7 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.300 60.0 0.005 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.023 0.0 0.800 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
1 0.007 1.7 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
2 0.004 0.9 0.004 ACA NUMBER : 890305 A11.dA DESCRIPTION: REPLACE COIL STACK MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 33.1 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.605 25.0 0.024 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.304 1.3 0.250 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM)- MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.061 :11.0 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
20 0.009' 1.7 0.005 O
- ,,_.._._._._..T.._ _ - . . . - . _ . . . . . _ . . . , _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ < _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ .
O r i
1990 EWR ALARA TRACKING NUMBERS ALARA-TRACKING DISRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL NUMBERS MANREM MANREM 900001 EWR 2512 - AUX. BLDG. SEIMIC 2.500 1.554 UPGRADES ,
t 900004 EWR 4218A - CV INST / TUBING 30.880 9.776 SUPPORTS A&B S/G 900005- EWR 4534 - OIL LEVEL MONT. -2.25 0.291 900006 EWR 4671 - A&B LOOP LVL. 30.34 5.933 UPGRADE.
900007 EWR 4892 - MID LOOP INST. 16.22 4.561 ENilANCEMENTS (RHR). ;
900008 EWR:4996 - LTOP RELIF VALVES. 0.22 0.000
- (? 900009 EWR:4755 - IST VENTS & DRAINS. 2.800 0.922 900010 EWR 4553 - RX. BMI. TUBING 4.750 0.605 '
SUPPORTS (A-SUMP) 900011 EWR:4218B- CV INST./TUDING 5.850 2.370 SUPPORTS A&B S/G.
4 900012 EWR 4218D- CV INST./ TUBING SUP. 9.750' 1.108 IN PZR.
~900013 EWR 4937 - HEAT TRACE UPGRADE. 5.050 2.986-900014- EWR:4617 - CV HANDRAILS 4.80 0.492 (A-SUMP & PZR.)
900015 EWR 2512C- CV SEISMIC UPGRADES. 3.600 -0.454 900016 EWR:4777 E.C.C.D. IN CV & . 4.33 1.272-
.. . . . .. .... . . . . .. ......_....-__-AUX _. . . . . . . ..____
GRAND TOTALS .
123.340 32.32 0000l')' p g y.74g gpo; n, soy O. /{3;70 37.327
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCilESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME' 12:05:27 g NUMBER 900001 ALARA NUMBER : 900001 ALARA DESCRIPTION: AUX. BLDG. SEISMIC UPGRADES (EWR-2512)
MAN-PEM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MAHilOURS # !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.637 0.120 0.000 0.000 4477.9 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.500 2600.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.655 1.7 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOS E/ MAN!!OUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
182 0.009 24.6 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
1342 0.001 3.3 0.000 GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
7 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . DODY SKIN ifANDS FEET MANiiOURS # HOURS
(
ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.637 0.120 0.000 0.000 4477.9 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 2.500 2600.0 0.001 t PREDICTION RATIO - 0.655 1.7 0.000 l
i t
! TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE i NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
182 0.009 24.6 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
1342 0.001 3.3 0.000 1
1 l
n v
PROG: R1MS020 [28C) ROCilESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: N/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:07:49 NUMBER 900004 ALARA NUMBER : 900004 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-4218A AND 4218B CV INST / TUBING SUPPORTS FOR A&B S/G MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANiiOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
12.287 1.282 0.000 0.000 3405.6 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
36.730 2723.0 0.013 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.335 1.3 0.308 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 102 0.120 33.4 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
977 0.013 3.5 0.004 GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
12.287 1.282 0.000 0.000 3405.6 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
36.730 2723.0 0.013 PREDICTION RATIO - O.335 1.3 0.309 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
102 0.120 33.4 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
977 0.013 3.5 0.004 0
PROGt RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGEt 1
- DATEt 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIMEt 12108154 NUMBER 900005 ALARA NUMBER t 900005 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!1 EWR 4534 OIL LEVEL MONITORING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FECT IdJsNilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.291 0.000 0.000 0.000 69.4 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.250 150.0 0.015 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.129 0.5 0.267 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
13 0.022 5.3 0.004 INDIVIDUALS - 25 0.012 2.8 0.004
- ------------------------------ GRAND TOTALS O MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. DODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # liOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.291 0.000 0.000 0.000 69.4 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.250 150.0 0.015 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.129 0.5 0.267 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
13 0.022 5.3 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
25 0.012 2.8 0.004 O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:09:32 g NUMBER 900006 I
ALARA NUMBER : 900006 i AIARA DESCRIPTION: EWR 4671 A&B LOOP LEVEL UPGRADE l l
I MAN-REM MAN-REM / l Wii . HODY SKIH llANDS FEET MAN!!OURS i IIOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.933 0.775 0.000 0.000 798.4 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
30.340 788.0 0.039 )
PREDICTION RATIO - 0.196 1.0 0.179 l TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE l NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MAHilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
76 0.078 10.5 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
302 0.020 2.6 0.008 l
l GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
[h MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.933 0.775 0.000 0.000 798.4 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
30.340 788.0 0.039 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.196 1.0 0.179 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
76 0.078 10.5 0.007 INDIVIDUAIS -
302 0.020 2.6 0.008 O
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DA C: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:10:09 NUMBER 900007 ALARA NUMBER : 900007 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR 4892 MID LOOP INSTRUMENT EllllANCEMENTS(RIIR)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . DODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS # If00RS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.649 5.350 0.000 0.000 1475.9 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
16.220 1200.0 0.014 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.287 1.2 0.214 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
63 0.074 23.4 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
520 0.009 2.8 0.003 GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
()
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.649 5.350 0.000 0.000 1475.9 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 16.220 1200.0 0.014 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.287 1.2 0.214 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
- NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOS E/ MAN!!OUR (MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
63 0.074 23.4 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
520 0.009 2.8 0.003 l
l l
l l
l O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOli PAGE: 1 3 ATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:10:52
(} NUMBER 900008 ALARA NUMBER : 900008 ALARA DESCRIPTIOll: EWR 4996 LTOP RELIEF VALVES Mall-REM Mall-REM /
hii . BODY skill !!AllDS FEET MANilOURS # !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.000 0.125 0.000 0.000 56.0 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.220 220.0 0.001 PREDICTIO!1 RATIO - 0.000 0.3 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAlillOURS DOSE /MAllllOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 4 0.000 14.0 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
14 0.000 4.0 0.000
GRAllD TOTALS --------------------------------
O MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.000 0.125 0.000 0.000 56.0 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.220 220.0 0.001 PREDICTIOli RATIO - 0.000 0.3 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAlillOURS DOSE /MAlillOUR (MREM) '
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.000 14.0 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
14 0.000 4.0 0.000 0
PROG: RDMS020 (20C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:11:41 NUMBER 900009 ALARA HUMBER : 900009 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-4755 IST VENTS AND DRAINS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi!. DODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANHOURS # }!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.922 0.032 0.000 0.000 128.8 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.800 1800.0 0.002 PREDICTIOF RATIO - 0.329 0.1 3.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.184 25.8 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
36 0.026 3.6 0.007 GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
l WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # POURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.922 0.032 0.000 0.000 128.8 0 Oc7 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.800 1800.O O et 2 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.329 0.1 ' 90 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANTIOUR(MREM) i WORK PERMITS -
5 0.184 25.8 0.007
- INDIVIDUALS -
36 0.026 3.6 0.007 l
O l
l 1
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:12:36 NUMBER 900010 ALARA NUMBER 900010 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RX BMI TUBING SUPPORTS _,( A SUMP)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.605 0.000 0.000 0.000 134.1 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.750 145.0 0.033 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.127 0.9 0.152 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
12 0.050 11.2 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
49 0.012 2.7 0.004
~~-------------------------- GRAND TOTALS ~~------------------------------
O- MAN-REM MAN REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS TEET MANHOURS f !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.605 0.000 0.000 0.000 134.1 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.750 145.0 0.033 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.127 0.9 0.152 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
12 0.050 11.2 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
49 0.012 2.7 0.004 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIoli PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME 12113117 NUMBER 900011
GRAllD TOTALS --------------------------------
Mall-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIH llAllDS TEET MAlill0URS # ll0URS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.000 0.0 0.000 PREDICTIOli RATIO - 0.000 0.0 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE liUMBER DOSES (MREM) MA!IIIOURS DOSE /MAlillOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 0 0.000 0.0 0.000 INDIVIDUALS - 0 0.000 0.0 0.000 0
0
PROG RDMS020 [?aC) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOll PAGEt 1 DATEt 90/06/26 REPORT ON AIARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12 13 57 g NUMBER 900012 ALARA NUMBER t 900012 AIARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-4218D CV INST / SAMPLE TUBING SUPPORTS IN PZR MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN llANDS TEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.108 0.000 0.000 0.000 260.7 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
9.750 361.0 0.027 PREDICTION RAT 10 - 0.114 0.7 0.148 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOS E/MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
34 0.033 7.7 0.004 INDIVIDUALS - 97 0.011 2.7 0.004 GRAND TOTALS --------------~~----------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.108 0.000 0.000 0.000 260.7 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
9.750 361.0 0.027 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.114 0.7 0.148 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 34 0.033 7.7 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
97 0.011 2.7 0.004 b) u
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCl! ESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:14:34
( NUMBER 900013 ALARA NUMBER : 900013 '
ALABA DESCRIPTION: EWR 4937 IIEAT TRACE UPGRADE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS $ !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.986 0.022 0.000 0.000 879.8 0.003 .
ESTIMATED TOTAL -
5.050 583.4 0.009 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.591 1.5 0.333 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANNOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
88 0.034 10.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
330 0.009 2.7 0.003 GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
U MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MAN}{OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.986 0.022 0.000 0.000 879.8 0.003 l ESTIMATED TOTAL -
5.050 583.4 0.009 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.591 1.5 0.333
- TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE l
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
88 0.034 10.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
330 0.009 2.7 0.003 l
O
PROGt RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:15:12 HUMBER 900014 ALARA NUMBER : 900014 ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-4617 CONTAINMENT llANDRAILS (A-SUMP,& PZR) i MAN-REM MAN-REM / l Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.492 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.8 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.800 140.0 0.034 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.103 0.7 0.147 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE I NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 17 0.029 5.9 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
31 0.016 3.3 0.005
GRAND TOTALS -------- -----------------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.492 0.000 0.000 0.000 100.8 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.800 140.0 0.034 '.
PREDICTION RATIO - 0.103 0.7 0.147 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
17 0.029 5.9 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
31 0.016 3.3 0.005 O
_ _ . _ _ _ . -m._ .- _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i I
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCliESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPNIATICH PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME 12:15t47 NUMBER 900015 i
ALARA NUMBER 900015 !
ALARA DESCRIPTION: EWR-2512C C.V. SEISMIC UPGRADES i l
l l
MAN-REM MAN-REM / l Wii . BODY SKIN llANDS FEET MANilOURS # !!OURS I ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.454 0.000 0.000 0.000 21.1 0.022 l ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.600 90.0 0.040 l PREDICTION RATIO - 0.126 0.2 0.550 1 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE i NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.045 2.1 0.021 INDIVIDUALS -
17 0.027 1.2 0.023 ;
GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
?
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wi! . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.454 0.000 0.000 0.000 21.1 0.022 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.600 90.0 0.040 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.126 0.2 0.550 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.045 2.1 0.021 INDIVIDUALS -
17 0.027 1.2 0.023 0
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TINE: 13 47 21 NUMBER 900016 ALARA NUMBER 900016 ALARA DESCRIPTION EWR-4777 ELECTRICAL CO!JNECTION CONFIGURATION DRAWING (ECCD) C.V., AUX. AND INTER. BLDGS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.272 0.000 0.000 0.000 263.9 0.005
-ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.330 314.0 0.014 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.294 0.8 0.357 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
20 0.064 13.2 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
100 0.013 2.6 0.005
--.----------------------------- GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
O MAN-REM MAN-REM /
e Wi! . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.272 0.000 0.000 0.000 263.9 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.330 314.0 0.014 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.294 0.8 0.357 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
20 0.064 13.2 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
100 0.013 2.6 0.005 l
l O
1
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGEt 1 JATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 14:07:59 g NUMBER 900017 ALARA NUMBER : 900037 ALARA DESCRIPTIO!!! PIPING SUPPORT INSPECTIONS EWR 5248 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.3 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
O.360 24.0 0.015
- PREDICTION RATIO - 0.025 0.3 0.067 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.003 2.8 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
4 0.002 2.1 0. C,01 i
l l
1 l
l GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
[' ')
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS l ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.3 0.001 l
ESTIMATED TOTAL - 0.360 24.0 0.015 PREDICTION RATIO - O.025 O.3 0.067 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.003 2.8 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
4 0.002 2.1 0.001 l
l O
l i
N4O J-lEN 2 E - M OV MT5 PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 1 D 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:02:36 NUMBER 900061 ALARA NUMBER : 900061 ALARA DESCRIPTION: llENZE MOVATS INSPECTION AND REPURDISilMENT AUX./ INT. BLDG.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS TEET MANilOURS $ llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.794 0.006 0.991 0.000 2321.2 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
16.300 2041.0 0.008 PREDICTION RATJO - 0.355 1.1 0.250 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANiiOURS DOSE / MAN!!OUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
320 0.018 7.3 0.002 INDIVIDUA LS -
793 0.007 2.9 0.002
GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS PEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.794 0.006 0.991 0.000 2321.2 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
16.300 2041.0 0.008 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.355 1.1 0.250 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANiiOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
320 0.018 7.3 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
793 0.007 2.9 0.002 i
PROG: RDMS020 [280) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIOtt PAGE: 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:50:37 NUMBER 900062 ALARA NUMBER : 900062 ALARA DESCRIPTION: ilE!1ZE MOVATS INSPECTION AND REFURBIS11 MENT C.V.
MAN-REM MAH-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.226 0.543 0.856 0.000 2058.5 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
10.000 372.0 0.027 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.523 5.5 0.111 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
136 0.038 15.1 0.003 IllDIVIDUALS -
802 0.007 2.6 0.003
GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
O MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIH llANDS FECT MAltllOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.226 0.543 0.856 0.000 2058.5 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
10.000 372.0 0.027 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.523 5.5 0.111 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
136 0.038 15.1 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
802 0.007 2.6 0.003 0
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATIO!1 PAGE 1 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT Oli ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 12:04:45
{} NUMBER 900063 ALARA I; UMBER 900063 ALARA DESCRIPTION RCP MOTOR REPLACEME!1T Mall-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HA11DS FEET MA!1110URS # llOURS ACTUAT. TOTAL -
6.689 0.634 0.000 0.000 1031.9 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
9.770 840.0 0.012 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.685 1.2 0.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANiiOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
78 0.086 13.2 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
403 0.017 2.6 0.007
GRAND TOTALS --------------------------------
0 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # 110URS ACTUAL TOTAL -
6.689 0.634 0.000 0.000 1031.9 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 9.770 840.0 0.012 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.685 1.2 0.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANiiOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
78 0.086 13.2 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
403 0.017 2.6 0.007 O
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 8 3ATEt 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMDER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER 900017 ALARA DESCRIPTION: PIPING SUPPORT IllSPECTIONS EWR 5248 MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN HA11DS FEET MANilOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.3 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.360 24.0 0.015 PREDICTIO14 RATIO - 0.025 0.3 0.067 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMDER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MAHilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 3 0.003 2.8 0.001 INDIVIDUALS - 4 0.002 2.1 0.001 L040 m A i rJ T .
A A NUMBER 900050 AIMRA DESCRIPTION: FUEL TRANSFER SLOT DECON AND SET UP MAH-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.605 0.000 0.298 0.000 326.9 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.840 40.0 0.046 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.329 8.2 0.043 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
26 0.023 12.6 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
128 0.005 2.6 0.002 O
PROG RDMS020 (28C) ROCilESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 9 DA 'E 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900051 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REMOVE ASBESTOS INSULATION FROM RllR llX'S AND REINS ULATE WITil NEW BAGS MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # 1100RS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.125 0.000 0.000 0.000 93.8 0.012 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.200 43.0 0.028 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.938 2.2 0.429 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERNITS -
17 0.066 5.5 0.012 INDIVIDUALS -
38 0.030 2.5 0.012 A 4 NUMBER : 900052 ADutA DESCRIPTION: C.V. ENTRY FOR INSPECTION, WORK, ETC., AT POWER MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN !! ANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.760 0.384 0.000 0.000 62.5 0.028 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 1.0 4.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.391 62.5 0.006 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
11 0.160 5.7 0.028 '
INDIVIDUALS -
57 0.031 1.1 0.028 O :
I
d l
PROG: RDl'_S 02 0 [28C) ROCllESTER GAG & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 10 l DATE. 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 l NUMBER 90XXXX 1
l ALARA NUMBER 900053 '
ALARA DESCRIPTION: FUEL TRANSFER CART / TRACK REFJRBISi! MENT l
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS i ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.949 0.000 1.176 2.075 395.3 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 100.0 0.045 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.433 2.0 0.222 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
9 0.237 21.7 0.010 INDIVIDUALS -
70 0.020 2.8 0.010 A A NUMBER : 900054 A DESCRIPTION: DECON SUMP TANK IN AUX. SUB-BASEMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOUPS # HOURS AC70AL TOTAL -
0.416 0.000 0.311 0.000 34.2 0.912 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.240 40.0 0.006 pr,cDICTION RATIO - 1.733 0.9 2.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MRF MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.208 17.1 0.012 INDIVIDUALS -
12 0.035 2.9 0.012 7_
C
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCl! ESTER CAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 11 3 ATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX 4LARA NUMBER : 900055 ALARA DESCRIPTION: FIRE SEAL INSPECTION AUX.AND INTER. BLDG.
(AND REPAIRS)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . DODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.074 0.000 0.000 0.000 831.0 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.800 1.0 1.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.597 831.0 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (KREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR (MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
97 0.011 8.6 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
316 0.003 2.6 0.001 A' h NUMBER : 900060 ALWKA DESCRIPTION: INSULATION REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF NEW INSUL ATION ON 'B' RCP MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIi1 IIANDS FEET MANHOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL 16.110 0.829 0.000 0.000 827.8 0.019 ESTIMATED TOTAL v4.000 545.0 0.117 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.252 1.5 0.162 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREH)
EORK PERMITS -
43 0.375 19.3 0.019 INDIVIDUA12; -
250 0.064 3.3 0.019 O
l I PROG: RDMS020 [280) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 12 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX
(]
ALARA NUMBER : 900061 ALARA DESCRIPTION. HENZE MOVATS INSPECTION AND REFURBISIIMENT AUX./ INT, BLDG.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.794 0.006 0.991 0.000 2321.2 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
16.300 2041.0 0.008 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.355 1.1 0.250 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
320 0.018 7.3 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
793 0.007 2.9 0.002 A. NUMBER : 900062 A DESCRIPTION: HENZE MOVATS INSPECTION AND REFURBISHMENT C.V.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
+ WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.226 0.543 0.856 0.000 ?.058.5 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
10.000 372.0 0.027 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.523 5.5 0.111 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK FERMITS -
136 0.038 15.1 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
802 0.007 2.6 0.003 E - _ - - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ -
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 13 D : 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX l
l ALARA NUMBER : 900063 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RCP MOTOR REPLACEMENT MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
6.689 0.634 0.000 0.000 3031.9 0.006 EST7 MATED TOTAL -
9.770 840.0 0.012 ,
PREDICTION RATIO - 0.685 1.2 0.500 1 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREH) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) 1 WORK PERMITS -
'8
/ 0.086 13.2 0.007 l IPDIVIDUALS -
403 0.017 2.6 0.007 l l
l l
l l
A \ NUMBER : 900066 A s DESCRIPTION: THERMOCOUPLE REPAIRS ON REACTOR HEAD j i
l MAN-REM MAN-REM / l WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS l ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.365 0.000 0.000 0.000 78.7 0.030 l ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.800 24.0 0.200 l PREDICTION RATIO - 0.493 3.3 0.150 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ,
NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR (MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
7 0.338 11.2 0.030 INDIVIDUALS -
39 0.061 2.0 0.031 j
i i
i l
I rm ;
%./
1 l
l 1
I
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 14 l D .: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 l NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900067 ALARA DESCRIPTION: SNUBBER INSPECTION AND REFURBISHMENT IN C.V. AND AUX. BUILDING MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.982 0.065 0.000 0.000 117.3 0.008 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 4.740 300.0 0.016 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.207 0.4 0.500 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AV"DAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS - 34 0.029 3.5 0.008 INDIVIDUALS -
91 0.011 1.3 0.008 A . NUMBER : 900068 ALARA DESCRIPTION: C.V. MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTIONS (NO WORK)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
15.832 6.472 0.000 0.000 1059.7 0.015 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.500 1.0 0.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 31.664 1059.7 0.030 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERM 7I3 -
17 0.931 62.3 0.015 INDIVIDUA: S -
2129 0.007 0.5 0.014 4
h
PROG: RDMS020 (28C] ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 15 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900069 ALARA DESCRIPTION: REPAIR UPENDER IN FUEL TRANSFER SLOT C.V. SIDE MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.493 0.000 0.192 0.358 36.9 0.013 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
2.800 13.0 0.215 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.176 2.8 0.060 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGi NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOLt1(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
5 0.099 7.4 0.013 INDIVIDUALS -
21 0.023 1.8 0.013 A NUMBER : 900075 A s DESCRIPTION: INSPECTION ONLY IN AUX. AND INTER. BLDGS.
MAN-kEM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
12.195 1.668 0.000 0.000 4599.8 0.003 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
15.000 1.0 15.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.813 4599.8 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
8 1.524 575.0 0.003 INDIVIDUALS -
3317 0.004 1.4 0.003 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C] ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 16 DATE: 90/06/26 EEPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 (vT NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900080 AIARA DESCRIPTION: I.&C. WORK IN AUX.& INTER.BLDGS.(CAL.,MAINT.,ETC.)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.522 0.000 0.000 0.000 274.7 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
5.747 4994.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.091 0.1 2.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
25 0.021 11.0 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
338 0.002 0.8 0.003 A T NUMBER : 900081 A1, DESCRIPTION: I&C WORK IN C.V.
(CALIBRATIONS,MAINT, INSPECTIONS ETC.)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN MANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
6.078 1.099 1.051 0.000 681.2 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
7.000 7550.0 0.001 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.868 0.1 9.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AV2 RAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
109 0.056 6.2 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
370 0.016 1.8 0.009 O
V
PROG: RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER CAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 17 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 g NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900082 ALARA DESCRIPTION: P AND ID WALKDOWN_ AUX.& INTER. BLDGS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN MANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.537 0.000 0.000 0.000 143.0 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.000 1.0 1.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.537 143.0 0.004 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
20 0.027 7.2 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
88 0.006 1.6 0.004 l
A - NLMBER : 900083 i
ALn DESCRIPTION: ROUTINE MAINT. ON VALVES, FLANGES, PUMPS ETC. IN AUX. AND INTER. BLDGS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
4.323 0.038 0.063 0.000 2584.2 0.002 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 1.0 4.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.961 2584.2 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
368 0.012 7.0 0.002 INDIVIDUALS -
1586 0.003 1.6 0.002 1
i o
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 18 D : 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900084 ALARA DESCRIPTION: ROUTINE MAINT. ON VALVES, FLANGES PUMPS ETC. IN CV.
(DURING SHUTDOWN)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
5.124 2.179 0.549 0.000 1238.5 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 1.0 4.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.139 1238.5 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
173 0.030 7.2 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
657 0.008 1.9 0.004 A h NUMBER : 900085 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RESULTS & TESTING IN AUX.AND INTER. BLDGS.
l \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\s\\
l l MAN-REM MAN-REM /
l WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS l ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.637 0.134 0.000 0.000 388.6 0.007 I ESTIMATED TOTAL -
9.750 325.0 0.030 l PREDICTION RATIO - 0.270 1.2 0.233 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE i NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
14 0.188 27.8 0.007 l INDIVIDUALS -
413 0.006 0.9 0.007
\
b)
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 19 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:50:14 g NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900086 ALARA DESCRIPTION: RESULTS AND TEST WORK IN CV AT POWER MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.368 0.028 0.000 0.000 54.8 0.007 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.720 36.0 0.020 PREDICTION RATIO - O.511 1.5 O.350 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.184 27.4 0.007 INDIVIDUALS -
76 0.005 0.7 0.007
~~---_------------------_----------------------- ._- _-----_--_-_-----_---------
A' \ NUMBER : 900087 A DESCRIPTION: RESULTS& TESTING IN C.V. DURING S!!UTDOWN MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
3.362 0.149 0.000 0.000 693.8 0.005 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 3.190 989.0 0.003 PREDICTION RATIO - 1.054 0.7 1.667 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
45 0.075 15.4 0.005 INDIVIDUALS -
270 0.012 2.6 0.005 f
O
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 20 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900088 ALARA DESCRIPTION: P.&I.D. WALKDOWN IN C.V.
MAH-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FECT MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.682 0.065 0.000 0.000 74.5 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL - 0.750 1.0 0.750 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.909 74.5 O.012 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
22 0.031 3.4 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
31 0.022 2.4 0.009 A A NUMBER : 900090 A DESCRIPTION: DECON WORK IN AUX., INTER. BLDGS, AND OUTSIDE AREA MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MAN!!OURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
6.797 0.924 0.000 0.000 6816.8 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
25.000 1.0 25.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.272 6816.8 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS --
73 0.093 93.4 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
3651 0.002 1.9 0.001 O
PROG: RDMS020 [28C] ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 21 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14
[] NUMBER 90XXXX a
ALARA NUMBER : 900092 ALAR) DESCRIPTION: DECON WORK IN C.V.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HCURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
10.560 3.392 0.523 0.000 1206.4 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
10.000 1.0 10.000 PREDICTION PATIO - 1.056 1206.4 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
63 0.168 19.1 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
882 0.012 1.4 0.009 lA A NUMBER : 900093 l A DESCRIPTION: LAUNDRY AND TRASH PICK-UP IN AUX. AND INTER. BLDGS i 1
l l MAN-REM MAN-REM / i WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.605 0.116 0.000 0.000 3632.3 0.000 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.770 4480.0 0.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.786 0.8 0.000 j TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
10 0.061 363.2 0.000 INDIVIDUALS -
1203 0.001 3.0 0.000 l
l v
f
PROG: RDMS020 (28C] ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 22 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14
( ) NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA FUMBER : 900100 ALARA DESCRIPTION: LOADING OF THE TRUCKS IN THE URWSB, PREP TO SHIP MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
2.830 0.000 0.037 0.000 3781.1 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.500 1.0 4.500 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.629 3781.1 0.000 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
4 0.708 945.3 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
1754 0.002 2.2 0.001 A \ NUMBER : 900101 A . DESCRIPTION: LIQUID WASTE PROCESSING USING BOTH THE DRUM & RUS.
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
1.758 0.000 0.000 0.000 186.2 0.009 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.000 1.0 3.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.586 186.2 0.003 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
14 0.126 13.3 0.009 INDIVIDUALS -
221 0.008 0.8 0.010
,O LJ
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 23 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ' 'TIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 g NUMBER 90XX,..<
aLARA NUMDER : 900102 ALARA DESCRIPTION: WORK IN ROPED AREAS OUTSIDE (TRASil, FORKLI FT, ETC)
MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wii . BODY SKIN liANDS FEET MANIIOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 272.0 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.200 1.0 1.200 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.123 272.0 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANiiOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.074 136.0 0.001 ,
INDIVIDUALS -
257 0.001 1.1 0.001 I l
I 1
1 1
i A NUMBER : 900103 l A DESCRIPTION: HIGli RAD RESIN TRANSFER MAN-REM MAN-REM /
" ?rl . BODY
. SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS s HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.590 0.000 0.382 0.000 44.4 0.013 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
1.125 20.0 0.056 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.524 2.2 0.232 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (M. REM; , MANHOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MilEM)
WORK PERMITS -
3 0.197 14.8 0.013 INDIVIDUALS -
18 0.033 2.5 0.013 v
PROGt RDMS020 (28C) ROCliESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 24 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARt. ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 g NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA 14 UMBER : 900105 ALARA DESCRIPTION: CIIANGE OUT FILTERS Wi!ICl! ARE IN CV MAN-REM MAN-REM /
Wil . BODY SKIN IIANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.391 0.152 0.309 0.000 14.3 0.027 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.000 1.0 3.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.130 14.3 0.009 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANilOURS DOSE /MANilOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
2 0.196 7.2 0.027 INDIVIDUALS -
9 0.043 1.6 0.027 A NUMBER : 900106 A A DESCRIPTION: CHANGE OUT FILTERS IN TIIE AUX /BLD MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS k HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.572 0.000 0.092 0.000 131.8 0.004 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
4.000 1.0 4.000 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.143 131.8 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANIIOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
14 0.041 9.4 0.004 INDIVIDUALS -
71 0.008 1.9 0.004 V
PROG: RDMS020 (28C) ROCllESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 25 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14 gg NUMBER 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900200 ALARA DESCRIPTION: ISI IM AUX BLDG HIGil RAD AREAS ONLY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WII . BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANilOURS # llOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.988 0.000 0.000 0.000 165.1 0.006 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
3.632 1.0 3.632 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.272 165.1 0.002 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MAN!!OURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
24 0.041 6.9 0.006 INDIVIDUALS -
70 0.014 2.4 0.006 AL 4 NUMBER : 900201 A WRA DESCRIPTION: ISI IN CV MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # liOURS ACTUAL. TOTAL -
12.256 0.596 0.847 0.000 1169.2 0.010 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
14.200 1.0 14.100 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.863 1169.2 0.001 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE / MAN 110UR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
157 0.078 7.4 0.011 INDIVIDUALS -
450 0.027 2.6 0,010 a
\_ J
\
PROG RDMS020 [28C) ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION PAGE: 26 DATE: 90/06/26 REPORT ON ALARA ESTIMATE TIME: 13:58:14
("
L )T NUMBFR 90XXXX ALARA NUMBER : 900202 ALARA DESCRIPTION: ISI AUX AND INTER DLDGS NONilIGH RAD AREAS ONLY MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # !!OURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.240 0.120 0.000 0.000 424.7 0.001 ESTIMATED T' AL -
0.316 1.0 0.316 PREDICTION RATIO - 0.759 424.7 0.003 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM)
WORK PERMITS -
43 0.006 9.9 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
137 0.002 3.1 0.001 l
l A NUMBER : 900300 A DESCRIPTION: RECEIVE, INSPECT, PREPARE S/G EQUIP. IN AUX. BLDG.
! MAN-REM MAN-REM /
WH. BODY SKIN HANDS FEET MANHOURS # HOURS ACTUAL TOTAL -
0.184 0.000 9.076 0.000 138.4 0.001 ESTIMATED TOTAL -
0.800 1.0 0.800 l
PREDICTION RATIO - 0.230 138.4 0.001 i TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER DOSES (MREM) MANHOURS DOSE /MANHOUR(MREM) l WORK PERMITS -
9 0.020 15.4 0.001 INDIVIDUALS -
54 0.003 2.6 0.001
- h Q