ML20083K387
| ML20083K387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1979 |
| From: | Mary Johnson SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083K339 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7901290356 | |
| Download: ML20083K387 (3) | |
Text
,wawwemy-::eus;>Mi.inMurnuc emar=-= u.hmMmM "Q@%
a.
v.
v '.
s af%
~
m w
w g.gn Wsh Q@7 y
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC a gas COMPANY ec.? OFFICE SOE 784 yg' Cotune A, south CAnouMA asais 4
j m
M.C.JOHusou pg,g,..(f
,,e
.......u.... i ncome January 5, 1979 s g'a e.
L :.y;g i
..; 7. -
.'9 ik%,
~,~
CD
, :/.-
M CZ United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission E*
f ATTN:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly
[
i Director
'~
Marietta Building, 31st Floor
[$ $
Marietta Street M&%)
..f Atlanta, Georgia 30302 1%g2
$$$9
Subject:
V. C. Summer Nuclear Station ih Unit #1
@4 Response to NRC Audit Reports
- 3%
50-395/78-27 dated 12/14/78 f.;;g and 50-395/78-28 dated 12/15/78
%,s
.N$$
Gent 1emen:
y?
C[%
m
_.r
?
In response to the above captioned reports, we have reviewed the infor-
+@el mation contained there-in and find that neither contains any proprietary.
information. In addition, we have evaluated the circumstances relating to the item identified as 78-27-05 in report 50-395/78-27, which dealt with four items related to drawing control which collectively represent a a7 deficiency. Our evaluation has produced the following results:
77.
1.
Cause
- M
@9 As was observed by Region II Inspectors during this inspection, N' '
the underlying cause of this concern is two-foldi hd)%
P; a) Existing procedures (FQCP 2.2.2, 2.2.3, & AP-IX-03), failed fsid to include sufficient detail to assure proper handling of
[$
g@h ECN and/or FCR hold stamps and file index distribution cards.
p
. W.:R q4 b) Periodic review of QA Program documents failed to identify Mp the growing inconsistency between our commitment to a h.-
comparison of drawing revisions to the A/E provided drawing
'sh@
h@
list. Earlier in the Project when the volume of drawing revisions were.small, this requirement was meaningful since ig the list was' current. As was observed by the Region II M;@g
-54f' Inspectors, by the time the' list is received, it is outdated.
This has resulted in the change ~in method of control noted.
Ql$
- .M j%
&f
$w.1,:V M N)
N l
-n w a
\\
Wr*x'"~'* 7w r -
.pm.y..<
.s t.
' 7': ~'AMf*'}
~ ~ T *W" L M f.i 'r-y'~ ~ T-r"
r
.~.
[ 7_1M3Ff *%,WGf P: r-WhWMEj. 'W=nwn-w
.P x ~C. spm..,; 1..
. e. v. n.
WW J
1 7
'.2 Mr. J mes 7. O'R2 illy
- - =
fn., :.
~
.s
,Paga 2
, g.-
January 5, 1979 M#d
~
WW 4,-g.
G G@O,;?
M%
c a.,i 2.
Immediate Co'rrective Steps Taken and Results
.g]
a) The noted eleven incorrect file index cards have been NET 5fh:-
corrected.
b)
FQCP 2.2.3 has been revised (Section 5.4) to incorporate MM controls for attaching / removing ECN/FCR-A Hold Stamps.
Qp
~
g%
The revised procedure is available for your review.
-A c)
FQCP 2.2.2 and AP-IX-03 have been revised to address
- 1) Removal of document hhlders from distribution, s.
- 2) Return of documents to Document Distribution by their holders, and y,
- 3) Instructions for filling out the File Index Distribution N.?Y e
Cards.
N[?4 Copies of the revisions are available for your review.
- g d) The A/E began weekly update of the drawing list in Decemb.er.
f'Tg;}
.A e) A SCEpG/QA audit of th'e A/E design review system was conducted M-
, f]
on December 13-15, 1978 with Region II in attendance. ECN/FCR
,h,yg controls were examined in depth and the adequacy of review of 4.?
QF affected documents considered. The report of that audit will
'C be available for your review during subsequent inspections.
3.
Corre'etive Steps Taken to Avoid Future Noncompliance
.N a) One Document Clerk has been appcinted to coordinate the T'
additional procedural controis l'Fdicated above.
b)~ The A/E transmits the dra$1ng with a transmittal slip which' is compared to the drawipgs. received by Documents and corrected L
g as applicable. A copy of the transmittal is returned to the GM
'A/EandwillbecomparecftbasuspensecopytoassureSCE&G
%j@d hasreceivedthelatespjevision.
{.
m:
c) The Document Distributida Supervisor (and those designees
.q,;, $;
actually performing the\\ work) have been instructed on the
.j
@f.,3 importance of properly filling out File Index Distribution Cards as addressed in the procedure revisions.
- M.
- .@?
- ?f.?
v..n d) Ammendment 11 to our FSAR Chapter 17.1 dated January, 1979, has g-yg been submitt9d to remove the drawing list from the revision MT control system. Future lists will be updated monthly and
,used by the Documen't Section for'information/ comparison purposes.
Sul yx O h, E 7Y b5
^ e:n v
T.
$V
~
.c x
. p' y
i
.K g
$2 Mf
---m~,
.,r, vraw"vW g* ' ~
- c *E ! -
2v
. e-
. ~ = _ _ _ _ _ _
- ~ ~
.-.t..-
7.
~ 9.;R.3..,w<%W... UW 55. T;i?flGPd%V!'iMiMdd$25?RhM@N,(i:E w
w
~
Y Mr. James P. O'Reilly q ui LM
- i. A s*g,/
Page 2 g
January 5,.1979 J.,pn+* \\J fy
". 3 4 D4 YsT4-Y Ygdog. j
'* N p~
w
/
j y
t
- pg.
.nn,y 4.
Full Compliance Date 9.u w-N A:
x All procedure revisions were complete as of January 4, 1979.
M'.~A.c
-w.
t :
J The SCE6G/QA A/E audit report will be issued during January, 1979.
h2!$.y.\\
a.
dew (tQ
.y M4kms We trust that you will find our actions to resolve this item appropriate WE and satisfactory. !? lease feel free to contact us if we can provide additional
(@SgW information in relation to this item or the captioned reports.
L43
- /
n.. aa qw Very truly yours, yg hk 1
'A 6FP'?']
q w;$
558
(
y f
9:-6+
r :.>.,
%.4
%?.ss
- w. r w
- N s DAN /MCJ/jls yy4j;.-
t-f '.
.-P s:j;... -p q.,
P1';
cc:
C. J. Frit:
RKf '
'/
G. C. Meetze e
4 '.
- ~
p e.
~
. 4 4I LYpOMC f!INSY@
7;3.%
<., m hb ;
er Y k,.
a.
b'ii:a.
'.p..:.
- .s.;
Q+..;,*3 y
' y.
t
.a 4
' eE
+rd, M
. - = +
Yk. 4.
.cv.
Tk* E
{p; r.
[$$3,'.
.Q w ue d'
':;g ;
- fff_f.h; w* ".~.K ?
'x.
.yX NW
- ' : n M.y
.-.t re.
e e3 ?.- y
\\
MSe q@
.es
@it4;
___-_-_-__-_____77 s
.e -., " ' %.. - '; : ^ -
's..;q ';*T* # Y
,_,:.s.
'