ML20081H516
| ML20081H516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1983 |
| From: | Parsons R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081H506 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-129 NUDOCS 8311070492 | |
| Download: ML20081H516 (3) | |
Text
r s
CP&L Carolina Power & Light Company a ge m ag =--ma m ya P. O. Box 101, New 11i11, N. C. 27562 October 21, 1983 Mr. James P. O'Reilly NRC-129 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 11 101 Marietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In reference to your letter of September 22,1983, referring to Ril: GFM/RLP 50-400/83-26-03, the attached is Carolina Power and Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Appendix A.
It is considered that the corrective action taken is satisfactory for resolution of the item.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours very truly, y f -~.
R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sh Attachment ec:
Messrs. G. Maxwell /R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC) 8311070492 831031 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G
o Attachment to CP&L Letter of Response to NRC Report Ril: GFM/RLP 50-400/83-26-03 Reported Violation:
10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by CP&L PSAR Section 1.8.5.5 and CP&L Corporate QA Program Section 6.2.5, requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with procedural requirements.
Contrary to the above, on August 16,1983, a Class IE olectrical cable was being installed even though all of its applicable raceway installation discrepancies had not been resolved, as required by Construction Procedure WP-206.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement ll.E).
Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.
1.
The clearance requirements between electrical raceways and mechanical piping identified in WP-203 allow for an engineering evaluation when they cannot be maintained. This interference was evaluated and FCR-P-1366 was written to reroute the pipe. Cl was aware of the interference and the FCR.
Therefore, further documentation was not required.
2.
FCR-E-1192 R3 was issued which added the nipple entry into IA3S-SA. The FCR was not incorporated into the CCL at the time the pull card was issued.
Verification of the completeness of the raceway was based on the pull card.
3.
The engineer who released the pull card was under the impression that all raceways were accepted. This was based on a walkdown performed by the engineer. Ilowever, the engineer did not follow the procedure requirements when he failed to implement our normal check and verification method.
Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved:
1.
Implementation of FCR-P-1366 rerouted the pipe and resolved the interference problem.
2.
Based on FCR-E-Il92 R3, an installation card for this nipple was issued to the field, inspected and accepted. A revised pull card was then issued to the field, installation completed, inspected and accepted.
3.
All raceways were completed, inspected and accepted or they are acceptable in accordance with WP-206.
I
3,
_ Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:
1.
Not required.
2.
IIPES is expediting Ebasco to incorporate FCR's and DCN's into the CCL in a timely manner. Also, with the aid of the site CCS computer system, a more thorough FCR/DCN review is being performed prior to issuing the cable card.
The CCS provides a FCR/DCN cross reference for each cable.
3.
To assure compliance with the requirements of WP-206, our method of check and verification will be used.
Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:
Full compliance was achieved on October 17,1983.
I t
i