ML20081C177
| ML20081C177 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1984 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081C176 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-840308, NUDOCS 8403120165 | |
| Download: ML20081C177 (9) | |
Text
.
o,
The TSC Technical Assessment Engineers perform their duties in the TSC and report to the TSC Lead Engineer.
i.
TSC Lead Communicator The TSC Lead Communictor is responsible for coordinating all communications p
traffic with the EOF, Corpora nd Center and off-site agencies. The TSC Lead h micator ensures that all A7,ggg information leaviss the TSC to non-LP&L agencies has first been approved by the I
Emergency Coordinatory dtAR. gAa/'
The TSC Lead Communicator performs his Ud/,
g duties from the TSC and reports to the Emergency Coordinator.
& Edf WN j
j.
TSC Communicators gg TSC Communicators tracsait and receive ff-M d information to and from the EOF, CCC and O 53+
f off-site agencies as directed by the TSC Lead Communicator.
The TSC Communicators perform their duties from the TSC and report to the TSC Lead Communicator.
k.
TSC Dose Assessment Communicator l
I l
The Dose Assessment Communicator maintains radio communications with the Field Monitoring Teams and transmits direction and guidance to them from the Dose Assessment Coordinator.
I The Dose Assessment Communicator also records the activities of the TSC Dose Assessment Group and field monitoring teams, and collects and l
preparas data as directed by the l
Dose Assessment Coordinator.
The Dose Assessment Communicator l
performs.his duties from the TSC Dose Assessment Area and reports to the Dose Assessment Coordinator.
5-12 Rev. 6 84031201e5 840300 PDRADOCK05000g 1
~--
t s..
b.
Contact the Duty Plant Manager and discuss the l
7 nature of the situation, the actions already underway, and levels of additional anticipated support that may be required to miti accident.% C.Nfach oQ 0 bu4-y PI gate the+ / % v SA~ll "'& L 3
M*A. I8, in d c.
Ensure notifi of agencies and personnel as
.g 4 4 described in n 6.2.1.
The initial notificationmessagecontainsinformationabout'$$[6C;sucj the class of emergency, whether a release of gg radioactive material is taking place, potentially affected populations and areas, and protective va5If johj action recommendations that may be warranted.
4"g^^1'f (See Figure 6-2)
AACmp]:sf tuy Mc.
6.2 Activation of Emergency Organization f.e eg g.44 6.2.1 Notification MMie d -l-iN llts&s scrild As stated in Section 6 1.3, upon declaration of an emergency by the SS at Waterford 3, the SS I" M '"b'A'I, (within 15 minutes of declaration of the emergency) directs initial notifications to agencies and personnel be made in conjunction with notification of on-shift personnel.
The notification e is a two phase process which entails nof.ifi of off-site agencies
'and activation of the Emerge sponse Organization.
6.2.1.1 Activation of the Emergency Response '
Organization Activation of the Emergency Response Organization depends largely on the nature of the incident and its classification.
The level of activation of the Emergency Response Organization is determined by the SS/ Emergency Coordinator following the guidelines of Section 6.2.2.3.b.
In all cases, regardlest of emergency classification, the following emergency positions are notified of the emergency condition:
a.
Emergency Coordinator (Duty Plant Manager) b.
Duty Emergency Operations Facility Director Activation of the LP&L Emergency Response Organization is conducted in parallel with the primary notifications and is in accordance with the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (see Figure 6-1).
6-2 Rev. 6
l 4
Once at the off-site assembly area, all personnel are assembled, with trained individuals performing monitoring of personnel and vehicles for radioactive contamination.
Individuals found to be contaminated are decontaminated in accordance with applicable Health Physics procedures. Vehicles found to be contaminated-are impounded at the assembly area to await decontamination and final disposition.
2.
Accountability Accountability of personnel within the protected area is performed utilizing the capabilities of the security
.c computer system and can be performed within 30 minutes of implementation.
Upon activation of each of the emergency response facilities, continuous acccountability is performed by
,M procedure for each facility's pertonne
/p
/
YkS*rf k
/9-6.6.1.2 Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations During emergency situations, the responsibility for providing protective action recommendations for the general public lies with LPE. Within the LPE emergency response organization, there is at all times one individual responsible for those recommendacions to State or parish agencies.
Section 5.1.2.1.a of this plan defines the individual responsibla to be the Shift Supervisor (SS) until the arrival of the Duty Plant Manager who will officially relieve the SS as the Emergency Coordinator.
Upon activation of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), the Emergency Coordinator g ala/g transfer the responsibilities for Protective Action Recommendations to off-site agencies to the EOF Director.
Recommendations for off-site Protective Actions will be made directly to those organizations linked to the Operational Hot line:
LNED, LOEP, St. Charles Parish, and 3t. John the Baptist Parish. Normally, these recommendations will be confirmed by LNED and reported back to the risk parishes by the 6-19 Rev. 6
m Insert A survey will be performed in the Exclusion Area outside A
the Protected Area to ensure all personnel have evacuated the area, or if required to be in the area, are accounted for.
- The Missouri-Pacific Railroad will be contacted to request suspension of rail traffic through the Exclusion Area. The Coast Guard will be contacted to request suspension of river traffic within the Exclusion Area.
Re-entry control will be maintained within the Exclusion Area 4
following the evacuation.
e 0
l i
I l
I'
.... -, _ _. _ _ _ ~.
6,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Environmental Affairs (ASOEA).
In the event that the emergency condition degrades more rapidly than the time necessary to contact LNED, then these recommendations will be made directly to the local parish officials.
/, __..
\\
O# 6g There are two general sets f Waterford 3 y f.
Protective Action GuidelineslW The first set of guidelinasjgt based on dose projectionsfy y
3_
p is consistent with both the USEPA PAG T
/
df#5 and with the PAG's of the State of Louisiana j
'M Peacetime Padiological Response Plan. The yk
.g PAG's are nuclear criteria based on dose g
projections from which pra-determined actions
-. p may be taken. These criteria are not y
'/
inflexible limits nor are they " safe" levels N _, _
below which no protective action is indicated. Rather, they will be used to minimize riska.for an accident which is occurring or has occurred.
The following guidelines will be utilized:
a.
Whole body projected dose less than 1 ren or child thyroid projected dose less
.b than,5 rem:
1.
No immediate action necessary.
2.
Sheltering will be considered.
b.
Whole body projected dose greater than 1 rem or child thyroid projected dose greater than 5 rem:
1.
Shelterlug will be reconuended in affected areas.
l 2.
Evacuation will be considered.
I 3.
Access control will be recommended in affected areas.
c.
Whole body projected dose greater than 5 ren or child thyroid projected dose greater than 25 rem:
l.
Evacuation will be recommended in affected areas.
2.
Access control will be implemented for the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
6-20 Rev. 6
e s
^
~
defense offices of the risk parishes. Once local and State authorities have been notified of the accident and the decision to take protective actions has been made, the alert / notification of the public will be
-accomplished,i-- - f:11;- 1.........,. Agig K %{gews, g
7 5ES M M a.4 4 hfr Q 6
11 Alert a.
Siren Warning System The' Siren Warning System for the W3SES
~
plumelexposure pathway EPZ is the primary means for alerting the public.
This system is composed of 42 fixed sirens.
It meets.the design standard i
established in' Appendix 3 to NUREG
~
0654..These sirens are radio activated C
and are capable of operation during loss of electrical power.
b.
)ne-Alert Receivers
'A gwabe.r of tone-alert receivars have been placed throughout the 10-mile EPZ as a backup to.the Siren Warning System.
c.
Helic ers drrangements have been cade to h' ave available helicopters equipped with loud-speaker systems at' the time of an f
i accident.\\Thesehelicopterswillbe
[
used to notjfy persons in wetland areas l
should protective actions become necesrary.
l d.
Tan-cut yarning Teams
\\
~
Arrangements hav'g been made for fan-out warning teans composed of sneriff's deputies and volunteer firemen who will
"~
provide alert assistance in residential areas.
This would be accomplished using
'~
public address systelas on police cars T
and fire trucks or by ng
, ' door to-door, as a repriate.
I e.
St. Charles Ind strial Eht Line
\\
This system e tablishes co'mmunications.
l i-between the Charles EOC nd major parish indus ries by means o dedicated t ephone network.
l' e 6-33 Rev. 6
=
w
--7"r T
wys-mi
-,d %--'w-
-P.,
y-y,-
p
-rt-
-w-Tt-
- ~
+^--+7'-'
.r 7'
2.
Communication Drills M Tc5/5 A, & m d & b d II.s -
Communications with State and local governments within the plume explosure pathway Emergency Planning Zone shall be tested monthly. Communications with Federal emergency response organizations and states-within the ingestion pathway shall be tested quarterly.
Communications between the nuclear facility, State and local emergency operations centers', and field assessment teams shall be-tested annually.
Communication drills will be designed to test the understanding of messages and the operability of equipment.
% s
^
g (p, y,Ju/m, 7",345 -
3.
Fire Drills Fire driils shall be conducted in k'.,j, 4 paelWM NC accordance with the plant (nuclear f/,M A/M facility) technical specifications.
Q1erf OWg -d.
4.
Medical Emergency Drills f
j gO - 7 q(., -d A gedictl emergency drill, involving a simulated contaminated. individual, which gg'gh k fste/. nan 4 contains provi'sions for participation by C-i the local support services agencies (i.e., ambulance and off-site medical j;
treatment facility) shall be conducted l
acaually.
The off-site portions of the l
medical drill may be performed as part of the required annual exercise.
5.
Radiological Monitoring Drills At least one drill per calendar year shall involve radiological monitoring i
l both on-site and off-site and the collection and analysis of sample media (e.g., water, grass, soil and air), and provisions for communications and record keeping.
r G.
Health Physics Drills A semiannual drill shall involve response to, and analysis of, simulated.
elevate.1 airborne and liquid samples and l
direct radiation measurements in the environment.
8-6 Rev. 6
LP&L, State, parish and Federal agencies, etc.) will receive revisions to the Emergency Plan Implementing Document, according to established metheds, as they are issued.
8.3.4 Telephone numbers included in the Emergency Plan call list are updated quarterly.
8.3.5 A review of Energency Action Levels (EAL's) shall be conducted by LP&L, State and local a'gencies on an annual basis.
8.3.6 Results of each annual review and update will be reported.to the Plant Manager and Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations.
8.4 Maintenance and Inventory of Emergency Equipment and Supplies The Emergency Planning Coerdinator.is responsible for planning and scheduling the inventory and inspection of designated emergency equipment and supplies.
Individuals are assigned to E
perform these activities at least once each calendar quarter and after each use.
Designated emergency equipment ad supplies and their locations are listed in the Emergency Plan Implementing Document.
Portable
, radiation monitoring equipment included in these inventories are calibrated 'in acccrdance with ap~ proved procedures.
To the extent practicable, emergency equipment is selected on a rotational basis from normal station equipment to assure proper operational status and familiarity with its use.
Instruments / equipment removed from the emergency equipnent inventory for calibratio, or repair will be replaced with normal station equipment such that the emergency equipment is always at its full complement.
Normal station equipment is available in sufficient quantity such that this does not hinder normal operations.
Equipment, supplies and parts having shelf-lives are checked and
^
replaced as necessary.
Any deficiencies found during the inventory and inspection will be either cleared or documented for corrective action.
of each inventory and inspection, including documented A report deficiencies, will le prepared and submitted to the Emergency-Planning Coordina3,.,The Emergency Planning Coordinator is o
responsible for -cTrrrect g.deficienciesgvm. c p M,'
8.5 Review / Audit of Emergency Preparedness Program An independent review / audit of the Emergency Preparedness Program is performed by Quality Assurance at least every twelve (12) 3 months.
8-9 Rev. 6
' to W3F84-0042
^
Additional Changes to be Made to the Waterford 3 Emergency Plan and Implementing Document In addition to the attached pages the following changes will he made:
1.
PS-16-104 is being developed for evacuation verification outside the Protected Area.
EP-2-190 vill be revised to reflect evacuation verification outside the Protected Area.
P l
0 4
I e
,.4
.a
-r.
4-v-,
,w.
m.
,a
., -,.,e,
.-v,-n.. ~. -.