ML20080T507

Forwards Rev to 1000-PLN-7200.01, Gpu Nuclear Operational QA Plan, Concurrent W/Ts Change Requests 237 & 215 to Delete Audit Program Frequency Requirements from Tmi,Unit 1 & Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Ts,Respectively

ML20080T507
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek, Three Mile Island
Issue date:	03/08/1995
From:	Sullivan J GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20080T510	List: ML20080T507 ML20080T517
References
1110-95-0017, 1110-95-17, C311-95-2142, C321-95-2097, NUDOCS 9503130361
Download: ML20080T507 (2)

Text

=~

y ,

.(

i I

F GPU Nuclear Corporation a i pa , Je y 07054 201-316-7000 TELEX 136-482 Writers Direct Dial Nurnber:

March 8, 1995 1110-95-0017 C311-95-2142 C321-95-2097 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Att: Document Control Desk ,

Washington, DC 20555 ,

Subject:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)

Docket No. 50-289 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS) ,

Docket No. 50-219 Supplement to TMI-l Technical Specification Change Request t (TSCR) No. 237 and OCNGS Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No. 215.

References:

(1) Letter from T. G. Broughton to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated April 19, 1994 (C311-94-2031).

(2) Letter from J. J. Barten to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated April 15, 1994 (C321-94-2042).

GPU Nuclear submitted TSCRs 237 and 215 to delete audit program frequency requirements from the Three Mile Island, Unit I and the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications, respectively. In each case it

was proposed to use the Operational Quality Assurance (0QA) Plan as the controlling document. As a result, Revision 8 of the 0QA Plan was submitted to the NRC concurrent with the TSCRs.

After reviewing the submittals, the NRC staff indicated concerns with two (2) aspects of the revised 0QA Plan. Specifically, the extension of the maximum i interval between certain types of audits to 36 months and the application of a six month grace period to all other audits were found to be unacceptable. GPU  :

Nuclear has modified the proposed Revision 8 to the 0QA Plan to delete the l aspects deemed to be unacceptable. The revised 0QA Plan pages are attached. I The revised Technical Specification pages submitted with the referenced  !

letters are not impacted by this change.

9503130361 950308

, PDR ADOCK 05000219 P PDR h .

GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of General Pubhc Utihties Corporation

EU i:. - ,

I.

11'10-95-0017' C311-95-2142 C321-95-2097.

Page 2 L.

GPU Nuclear considers these TSCRs to be Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions o (CBLAs). It is estimated that implementation of these changes could result ~ in a savings of $900K for the duration of the current licenses.

Sincerely, 17 J. L. Sullivan, Jr.

Director, Nuclear Safety Assessment Attachment c: Administrator, Region 1 0C NRC Project Manager OC Sr. Resident Inspector TMI NRC Project Manager TMI Sr. Resident Inspector c-2 f

l 1