ML20080F862
| ML20080F862 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1984 |
| From: | Grundstrom R UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080F826 | List: |
| References | |
| EIP-ZZ-00212, EIP-ZZ-212, NUDOCS 8402130173 | |
| Download: ML20080F862 (16) | |
Text
EIP-ZZ-00212 January 27, 1984 Revision 1 O
V CALLAWAY PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE EIP-ZZ-00212 y
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1
bItJOskOf}g DEPT.htraffi(M hMCdktf PREPARED BY i
G RESP.
d
)
APPROVED BY DATE M/"8Y
/
DATE ISSUED 7-3-8h This procedure contains the following:
Pages 1
through 6
Attachments 1
through 7
Appendices-through Checklist through INFORM /UiOM ONLY l
U NC0i\\ T 10_ _ED CO ?.Y.
l l
8402130173 840202 hDRADDCK 05000483 l 9 eDR h
Procad. No. EIP-ZZ-00212 i
Rev.
1 Date 01/27/84 DEFICIENCY LIST f(.' Seetion Deficiency Description Constraints Subarea population and None evacuation estimates are not available until February 1984 O
DL Page 1.of 1 eg-- - - - +
y-ye+
e e-m--
+y~-w%e-w.rq--
y-ww
-mm--,
--g-,
->,---g-wy-,
,, -,e-y-,m--g-v vw
,,7-r,www-g--
+ -, -
-ww-,,,ew,w v w,eww w www, wwww mw-,ww www,e-p
Proced. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 R v.
1 O
Table of Contents Section Page Number 1.0 Purpose and~ Scope 1
2.0
-Responsibilities 1
3.0 Initiating Conditions 1
4.0 Procedure 2
i 4.1 Plume Exposure Pathway 2
4.2 Ingestion Exposure Pathway 4
3 4.3 Notifications 4
l 5.0 Final Conditions 5
6.0 Records 5
7.0 References 7
8.0 Attachments 8
l Attachment 1 - Protective Action Decision Flow Chart-l Plume Exposure Pathway c
l' Attachment 2 - Protective Action Decision Chart-Ingestion Exposure Pathway l Attachment 3 - Emergency Protective Action Guidelines for.the Ingestion Exposure Pathway
(
'l Attachment 4 - Preventative Protective Actions for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway l Attachment 5*- Sector-Subarea Matrix l
I l Attachment 6 - Plume Travel Time l Attachment 7 - Protective Action Recommendations
Proced. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 Rav.
1 O
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidance and instruction for making protec-tive action recommendations during a radi-ological accident at the Callaway Plant to those offsite agencies responsible for im-plementation of protective actions for the general public.
2.0 RCSPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Emergency Coordinator or Recovery Manager, upon transfer of responsibilities, is responsible for making protective action recommendations to the agencies responsible for implementing prote cive actions for the 4
general public.
2.2 The Health Physics Coordinator (HPC) is responsible for providing information
['s]
concerning radiological assessment to the -
Emergency Coordinator for use in making protective action recommendations.
2.3 The Radiological Assessment Coordinator l
(RAC) is responsible for providing informa-tion concerning radiological assessment to o
the Recovery Manager for use in making protective action recommendations.
2.4 The Technical Assessment Coordinator (TLC) is responsible for providing information concerning plant condi~tions to the Emergency Coordinator.
2.5 The Technical Support Coordinator is respon-sible for providing information concerning l
plant conditions to the Recovery Manager.
3.0 INITIATING CONDITIONS 3.1 An emergency requiring dose projections or assessment has been declared.
O i
. ~, - - _.. -.
Proctd. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 Rev.
1 O
32 An emergency, in which plant conditions in-dicate that.a core melt sequence is in pro-gress, or projected.
3.3 At the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager.
4.0 PROCEDURE The Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager shall make the necessary protective action recommendations to the offsite authorities following the appropriate guideline of this procedure.
l 4.1 Plume Exposure Pathway Protective action recommendations can be derived by utilizing Attachment 1, Protec-tive Action Decision Flow Chart.
4.1.1 Upon declaration of a GENERAL EMERGENCY an immediate protective action recommendation for shelter in the 2 mile radius and 5 miles Os
- downwind should be made.
This recommenda-tion should be modified upon evaluation of plant, radiological, and meteorological con-ditions, as appropriate.
O.
Proctd. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 Rrv.
1 l'h U
4.1.2 Utilizing information on plant conditions, core status, and radiological status, deter-mine the appropriate recommendation (s) by following the correct flow path on Attach-ment 1.
NOTE The Health Physics Coordina-tor, Radiological Assessment Coordinator, Technical As-sessment Coordinator, or Technical Support Coordina-tor shall supply the Emergency Coordinator or Recovery Manager with the appropriate protective ac-tion recommendation utiliz-ing Attachment 1, when directed or when conditions from the respective areas indicate a protective action recommendation should be made.
f-~3 4.1.3 If an evacuation is recommended, recommend
'(
shelter for areas that cannot be evacuated before the plume arrive.
4.1.3.1 The Health Physics Coordinator / Radiological Assessment Coordinator can supply the neces-l sary plume travel information utilizing the guidance of EIP-ZZ-01211, Initial and Inter-mediate Dose Assessment.
4.1.4 The projected whole body dose, thyroid dose, the affected area (s), and plume arrival time shall be supplied by the Health Physics Coordinator / Radiological Assessment Coordi-nator and recorded on Attachment 7, Protec-tive Action Recommendations.
4.1.4.1 Upon obtaining projected whole body and thyroid doses for affected areas the Health Physics Coordinator / Radiological Assessment i
Coordinator shall advise the Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager on the appro-j priate protective action recommendation.
(O L) l
, l
Procad. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 R:v.
1 d
4.1.5 Record the appropriate recommendations on, Protective Action Recommenda-tions and ensure that the Followup Notifica-tion Form and the Status Boards are updated.
l 4.2 Ingestion Exposure Pathway Protective action recommendations for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway should be made for protecting the public from unnecessary exposure from this path.
These recommenda-tions should not have to be made during the initial phases of an accident.
During the initial phase the primary concern should b from direct exposure to a passing plume an!
the inhalation of radioactive materials.
4.2.1 Protective action recommendations for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway should be made utilizing Attachment 2, Protective Action Decision Chart - Ingestion Exposure Pathway l
and initiated upon significant projected or measured contamination levels in the
(~3 environment.
l 4.2.2 The Health Physics Coordinator / Radiological Assessment Coordinator should supply the contamination levels needed to make the ap-propriate recommendations and advise the l
Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager on t
the proper recommendation.
4.2.2.1 The Health Physics Coordinator / Radiological Assessment Coordinator shall obtain the needed information utilizing the guidance of EIP-ZZ-02211.
OV __
Proced. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212 Rsv.
1 i
O l 4.3 Notifications The Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager shall ensure the appropriate notifications are made regarding protective action recom-mendations in accordance with EIP-ZZ-00201, Notifications.
4.3.1 Recommendations should be given directly to the Bureau of Radiological Health /SEMA, if they have activated their Forward Command Post in the EOF, utilizing the SEMA Addi-tional Notification Form.
NOTE The protective action recom-mendations given to the local authorities should be first coordinated with SEMA if at all possible.
4.3.2 If the State's Forward Command Post is not activated ensure notifications are made in accordance with EIP-ZZ-00201, utilizing the SEMA Additional Notification Form.
~O' 5.0-FINAL CONDITIONS 5.1 Dose assessment and technical assessment have determined that the radiological release has stopped or diminished and there is not a potential for additional releases, and l 5.2 All protective action recommendations have been made in accordance with this procedure.
6.0 RECORDS 6.1 QA RECORDS l 6.1.1, Protective Action Recommenda-tions O
. ~_
Proced. No.
EIP-ZZ-00212
. R v.
1 (o
7.O REFERENCES 7.1 EPA 520/1-75-001, Manual of Protective Ac-tion Guides and Protective Actions for Nu-clear Incidents 7.2 NUREG 0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Prepara-tion of and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants l 7.3 Callaway Plant Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) l 7.4 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 242, Friday, December 15, 1978, Proposed Rules, 21 CFR Part 1090, Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Human Food and Animal Feeds l 7.5 EIP-ZZ-01211, Initial and Intermediate Dose Assessment l 7.6 EIP-ZZ-00201, Notifications f
5
'~
8.0 ATTACHMENTS 8.1, Protective Action Desision Flow Chart l 8.2, Protective Action Decision Chart - Ingestion Exposure Pathway l 8.3, Emergency Protective Actions for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway l 8.4, Preventative Protective Ac-tions for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway l
l 8.5, Sector-Subarea Matrix l 8.6, Plume Travel Time l 8.7, Protective Action Recommenda-tions
,OO Proegd. No. EIP-22-00212 R:v.
1 PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISION FLOW CHART g
START r^s (
(-
!IMMEDIATE/AUTOMATICACTIONS!
i 8
GENERAL EMERGEN YES
')
8 2 MILE RADIUS AND a
5 MILES DOWNWIND p
LOSS MMINENT SUBSTANTI cggc,^M^oga\\-
ES 4 As tARGE r1SSION SYSTEM INTEGRITY CONTAINMENT o
m uS FAI1.URE OR uS DROJ3CTED N CONTAINMEN UNDERWA" NO NO N0 h
1 RECOMMEND 2 MILE RECOMMEND 2 MILE RADIUS EVACUATION, RADIUS EVACUATION, 5 MILE SHELTER 5 MILE EVACUATION DOWNWIND D0k3 WIND I
RECOMMEND SHELTER RECOMMEND 5 MILE RADIUS C
FOR AREAS THAT CANNOT C
EVACUATION AND 10 MILES
\\
BE EVACUATED BEFORE DOWNWIND' V
PLUME ARRIVAL i
PROJECTED WHOLE BODY DOSE RECOMMEND MANDATORY EVACUATION m
> 5 REM AND/0R IN AFFECTED AREA AND CONTROL HYROID DOSE ACCESS 25 R 10 ROJECTED RECOMMEND SHELTER IN AFFECTED WHOLE BODY DOSE AREA (AS A MINIMUM), EVACUATE
>1 REM AND/0R UNLESS CONSTRAINTS MARE IT HYROID DOSE IMPRACTICAL REM NO RECOMMEND SHELTER FOR l
AREAS THAT CANNOT BE EVACUATED BEFORE PLUME ARRIVAL PROJECTED kHOLE BODY DOSE
'l NO PROTECTIVE ACTIO!'S_ REQUIRED i 1 REM AND/0R l
HYROID DOSE
< REM CONTINUE ASSESSMEN ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 1
Proced. No. EIP-ZZ-00212 Rav.
1 PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISION CHART INGESTION EXPOSURE. PATHWAY O
IS PROJECTED INGESTION DOSE i
GREATER THAN 15 REM THYROID OR S REM WHOLE BODY OR YES T
EMERGENCY ACTIONS ANY OTHER ORGAN; OR ON ATTACHMENT 3 IS ANY. EQUIVALENT RESPONSE LEVEL IN TABLE 1 XCEEDEDt 0
IS PROJECTED INGESTION DOSE GREATER THAN 1.5 REM THYROID OR PREVENTIVE ACTION 5 0.5 REM WHOLE BODY YES s
OR ANY OTHER ORGAN; ON ATTACHMENT 4 OR IS ANY EQUIVALENT
(,-
IN TABLE 2 RESPONSE LEVEL EXCEEDED?
i:
NO NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS NECESSARY TABLE 1 - RESPONSE LEVELS FOR EMERGENCY PAG (Infant Critical Population Segment)
CRITICAL-SURFACE MILK OR TOTAL PASTURE ORGAN CONTAMINATION DRINKING WATER INTAKE GRASS (uCi/m )
(uCi/1)
(uC1)
(uCi/KG)
I-131 THYROID 1.4 0.12 0.9 2.7 Cs-137 WHOLE BODY 17 3.4 70 35 Sr-90 BONE 3.4 0.08 2.0 7.0 Sr-89 BONE 60 1.3 26 130 TABLE 2 - RESPONSE LEVELS FOR PREVENTIVE PAG CRITICAL SURFACE MILK OR TOTAL PASTURE l
ORGAN CONTAMINATION DRINKING WATER INTAKE GRASS (uCi/m )
(uCi/1)
(uCi)
(uCi/KG)
I-131 THYROID
.14
.012
.09
.27 v
Cs-137 WHOLE BODY 1.7
.34 7.0 3.5 l.
Sr-90 BONE
.34
.008
.20
.70 Sr-89
-BONE 6.0
.13 2.6 13 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 1
Proced. No. EIP-ZZ-00212 Rev.
1 I)
EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES FOR
\\ss'
-THE INGESTION EXPOSURE PATHWAY Emergency action'to be considered:
Isolate milk, drinking water or food containing radioactivity to prevent its introduction into commerce and determine whether condemnation or another dispostion is appropriate.
Before taking this action, the following factors should be considered:
1.
The availability of other possible protective actions.
2.
Relative proportion of the total diet by weight represented by the item in question.
3.
.The importance of the partic~lar food in nutrition and u
the availability of uncontaminated food or substitutes having the same nutritional properties.
4.
The relative contribution of other foods and other radionuclides to the total projected dose.
5.
The time and effort required to effect corrective f"')
action.
%J i
l l
l i
I
(
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 i
~,.
.._,_.._,.__.s
Procod. No. EIP-ZZ-00212 Rev.
1 PREVENTATIVE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR
()
THE INGESTION EXPOSURE PATHWAY v
Preventative actions to be considered:
1.
~For pasture:
a.
Removal of lactating dairy cows from contaminated pasturage and substitution of uncontaminated stored feed.
b.
Substitute source of uncontaminated water.
2.
Fcr milk:
a.
Withholding of contaminated milk from the market to allow radioactiva decay of short-lived radionuclides.
This may be. achieved by storage of frozen fresh milk, frozen concentrated milk, or frozen concentrated milk products.
b.
Storage for prolonged times at reduced temperatures also is feasible provided ultrahigh temperature pasteurization techniques are employed for processing.
c.
Diversion of fluid milk for production of dry whole milk, nonfat dry milk, butter, or evaporated milk.
l 3.
For fruits.and vegetables:
f- -)-
l
- (
\\#
a.
Washing, brushing, scrubbing, or peeling to remove surface contamination.
b.
Preservation by canning, freezing, and_ dehydration or storage to permit radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides.
4.
For grains:
a.
Milling b.
Polisbing 5.
For other food products:
l a.
Processing to remove surface contamination.
j 6.
For meat and meat products:
l-L a.
Consider on a case-by-case basis.
7.
For animal feed.s:
fg a.
Actions relative to animal feeds, other than pasture, v) should be carried out on a case-by-case basis, a
b '.
' Increase noncontaminated mineral calcium to a mcximum.
ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 1
Proced. No. EIP-ZZ-00212 Rav.
1 SECTOR - SUBAREA MATRIX AFFECTED SUBAREA AND EVACUATION TIME O - 2 MILES 2 - 5 MILES 5 - 10 MILES EVACUATION EVACUATION EVACUATION SECTOR SUBAREA TIME' SUBAREA TIME SUBAREA TIME A
C1 C3 C3, C10 B
C1 C3 C3, C10, C11
'C C1 C3, C4 Cll, M1 D
C1 C4 C4, Cll, M1 E
C1 C4, C5 C4, M1, M2
-F C1 C4, CS C4, M2, G1 C
C1 C4, CS C4, 01 H
C1 C5 01 C1 C5, C6 01 K
C1 C6 01 L
C1 C6 C7 M
C1 C6 C6, C7 N
C1 C2, C6 C6,C2,C8,C7 P
C1 C2 C8, C9 Q
C1 C2 C2, C8, C9 i
R C1 C2, C3 CIO, C8 SUBAREA POPULATIOE AND EVACUATION ESTIMATE
~
i EVACUATION EVACUATION l
SUBAREA PCPULATION ESTIMATE SUBAREA POPULATION ESTIMATE C1 C9 C2 CIO C3 C11 C4 M1 I
C5 M2 C6 G1 C7 01 C8 ATTACHMeliT 5 Page 1 of 1
c.
p
\\_j b
Proced. No. EIP 00212 Rev.
1 PLUME ARRIVAL TIME (Hours From Time Release Began)
WIND SPEED DISTANCE (Miles)
(m/s)
EAB 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 12 15 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.5 5.5 6.4 7.3 8.2 9.1 11.0 13.6 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.7 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.4 5.3 6.7 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.7 3.3 4.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 6.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 8.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 3.3 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 NITACHMENT 6 Page 1 of 1 1
t t'
~
~
\\/
\\_/
Proced. No. EIP-ZZL,J212 Rev.
1 PROTECTIVE ACTION' RECOMMENDATIONS DATE TIME PLUME PROJECTED DOSE I
PROTECTIVE ACTION ARRIVAL WHOLE (Circle as Appropriate)
TIME BODY THYROID 0
EAB -
2 Miles None/ Evacuate / Shelter 2-5 Miles None/ Evacuate / Shelter
~
All/Affected Sectors / Adjacent Sectors 5 - 10 Miles None/ Evacuate / Shelter All/Affected Sectors / Adjacent Sectors OTHER None/ Evacuate / Shelter
.All/Affected Sectors / Adjacent Sectors i
l Affected Sectors A
B C
D E
F G
H J
K L
M N
P Q
R Adjacent Sectors A
B C
D E
F G
H J
K N
M N
P Q
R j
NOTES:
i 4
~
l Emergency Coordinator / Recovery Manager
]
(Signature) i ATTACHMENT 7 Page 1 of 1