ML20079N240
| ML20079N240 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1990 |
| From: | NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-1437 AR, S, WM, NUDOCS 9111110127 | |
| Download: ML20079N240 (62) | |
Text
pg1 6( A1l90 e
4 iskr' icd--
UTILITY jbro 5)<a
'r a t,) () /
L ti
[Co3er SITE l
ENCLOSURES A A S u) p r S Mo a (, as N o n) 1 3;Lc + b Old-CCb(hen +3
{AN, 4
w,,
(Z M
4,b v
\\
- .,S
' ?
9111110127 900822 PDR NUREG 1437 C PDR
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 1 of 33 MASTE MANAGEMENT QUESTIONS A.
Spent Fuul Questions 1.
Which of the following current techniques for at-reactor storage are you using and how?
A.
Re-racking of spent fuel B.
Control Rod Repositioning (deleted)
C.
Above ground dry storage D.
Longer fuel burnup E.
Other
Response
A.
The Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) spent fuel original configuration had cpace for 740 fuel assemblies.
The spent fuel pool was re-racked in 1978-1979 to increase capacity to its present value of 2366 fuel assemblics.
B.
(Deleted)
C.
None D.
The District is presently in transition to enhanced design fuel that is expected to increase discharge burnup to approximately 36,000 MWD per metric ton.
This is an increase of about 4,000 -
5,000 MWD per metric ton over current values.
E.
None 2.
Do you plan on continuing the use of these current techniques for at-reactor storage of spent fuel during the remaining time of your operating license or do you expect to chance or modify them in some way?
Response
The District plans to continue using current techniques.
3.
Which of the following techniques for at-reactor storage do you anticipate using until off-site spent fuel storage becomes availabic and how?
A.
Re-racking of spent fuel B.
Centrol Rod Repositioning (Deleted)
+.
C Aoove ground dry storage D.
Longer fuel burnup E.
Other (please identify)
r I
Attachment to NL59000290 Pcgs 2 of 33
Response
A.
At some time in the future the District will probably consider additional re-racking of the spent fuel pool as well as dry storage for further expansion of spent fuel storage capacity.
B.
(Deleted)
C.
See response to A D.
The District plans to evaluate and possibly utilize future extended burnup fuel designs as they become available.
E.
None 4.
Will the techniques described above be adequate for continued at-reactor storage of spent fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-year period of license renewal, or are you developing other plans?
Pesponse:
The techniques described above should be adequate for the remaining lifetime of CNS including recapturing the construction pemit to operating license time period.
The District has not considered any additional operation beyond this tem (i.e. 20 year license renewal).
Consequently, no assessment of spent fuel storage for license renewal has.seen performed.
5.
Do you anticipate the need to acquire additional land for the storage of spent-fuel for the operating lifetime of the plaat, including a 20-year period of license renewal? If so, how much land? When would this acquisition occur? Where? (if answer "yes", 3-4 sentences)
Response
Adequate land appears to be available at the existing site so no acquisition should be needed in the future.
6.
Do you anticipate any additional construction activity on-site, or immediately adjacent to the power plant site, associated with the continued at-reactor storage of spent fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-year period of license renewal? (yes/no)
+.
Response
Additional construction activity will take place in connection with increased spent fuel storage capacity on-site.
This will be in the form of either re-racking of the storage fuel or building above ground dry storage areas,
Attachrnent to NLS9000298 Page 3 of 33 7.
If you answered yes to question 6, briefly describe thic construction activity (e.g., expansion of fuel storage pool, building above ground dry storage facilities).
Responra:
See response to No. 6.
h e.,
~
Attachm2nt to
/*
NLS9000299 Page 4 of 33 i
B.
Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Questions 1.
Under the current scheme for LLRW disposal (i.e.-
LLRW Policy Amendments Act of 1965 and regional compacts) is there currently or j
will sufficient capacity for wastes generated during the license renewal period be available to your plent(s)? If so, what is the basis for this conclusion?
Response
Yes.
Nebraska is a member of the Central Interstate Low-% vel i
Radioactive Waste Compact Commission.
The Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste compact Commission. was ratified by the
]
U.S.
Congress in 1985 with Nebraska being selected as the host disposal state in 1988.
If siting and d6velopment plans proceed as presently scheduled, HPPD believes that these arrangements will j
satisfy the low-level radioactive waste disposal requirements of Cooper Nuclear Station throughout its operating life.
f 2.
If f or any reason your plant (s) is/are denied accees to a licensed disposal site for a short period of time, what plans do you have for continued LLRW disposal?
Response
In 1984 NPPD designed and constructed a Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Storage Facility at the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) site. The design and construction of this f acility was -based on existing NRC LLRW Storage Facility guidelines and licensing requirements.
Although the NRC review of the facility for compliance with LLRW Storage Facility licensing requirements has not yet been completed, because of the lack of need to fully utilize the facility, NPPD anticipat es this f acility could be, used to temporarily store the LLRW generated at CNS during any five year period.
3.
In a couple of pages, please describe the specific methods of LLRW management currently utilized by your plant.
What percentage of your current LLRW (by volume) is manage by:
A.
Wasto compaction?
B.
Waste Segregation (through special controls or segregation at radiation check point)?
C.
Decontamination of wastes?
D.
Sorting of waste prior to shipment?
E.
Other (please identify)
(Such as solidification of liquids and resins, dewatering of resins)
Attcchment to NLS9000298 Page 5 of 33 i
3.
Continued
Response
Dry Active Waste Compaction 41%, 4,900 Ft."
Dewatering of resins / sludges 40%, 4,800 Ft."
Cement Stabilization of resins / sludges 4%,
480 Ft."
Solidification of oils 2%,
240 Ft."
Dry Active Waste Solidification 3%,
400 Ft."
Noncompactible Dry Active Waste 10%, 1,200 Ft."
Waste Segregation 0%
Decontamination of Waste 0%
0%
Sorting of Waste The management of LLRW at NPPD's CNS can be categorized into shredding and supercompaction of dry active waste, cement stabilization of Class B resins and sludges, dewatering of Class A resins and sludges, solidification of oils and dry active waste, and crating of noncompactible dry active waste.
Inherent to the management of LLRW is the minimization of nonradioactively contaminated material introduction into the CNS Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA).
Reuse of radioactively contaminated tools and equipment ip the RCA is commonly practiced to assist in minimizing the introduction, influx, etc. of clear materials in the RCA.
Although LLRW is not decontaminated, attempts are made to decontaminate reusable tools and equipment which have become radioactively contaminated.
Materials which e-e' successfully decontaminated are released for unrestricted use.
haterials which cannot be decontaminated are either reused in the RU., disposed of as radioactive waste or shipped to other licensees who may have a use for the material.
Clean materials are not sorted out of LLRW prior to waste processing or shipment, because station practices preclude very little clean material from entering the waste stream and due to the cost effectiveness of such a practice.
4.
In a couple of pages, please describe tha anticipated plans for LLRW management to be utilized by your plant (s) during the remlinder of the 1
Attachment to
(
NLS9000298 l
l page 6 of 33 4.
Continued What operating license and through the license renewal term.
percentage of your anticipated wasta (by volume) will be managed by:
A.
Waste compaction?
B.
Waste segregation (through special controls or segregation at radiation check point)?
C.
Decontamination of wastes? _
D.
Sorting of waste prior to shipment?
E.
Other (please identify)
Response
40%
Waste compaction / incineration 40%
Dewatering of resins Cement Stabilization of resins 5%
5%
Dry Active Waste Solidification Decontamination / recycling of waste 5%
St Non Compactible Waste 0%
Waste Segregation 0%
Sorting of waste NPPD anticipates only minor sprovements in the management of LLRW at CNS during the remainder of the operating license and through the license renewal term.
Improved LLRW management techniques currently under investigation include incineration of dry active waste and equipment
- of1, smelting of nonincinerable naterials, abrasive decontunination of large components and component recycling.
if economically feasible, the combined effect of these improved LLRV management techniques could reduce the total volume of LLRW generated at CNS by an estimated 30%.
This equates to a reduction in LLRW burial volumes of approximately 3,000 Ft." per year. -
Use of the recently announced Below Regulatory Concern policy by the NRC will have little impact on the management of LLRW at CNS.
5.
Do you anticipate the need to acquire additional land for the storage of LLRW for the operating lif etime of the p'. ant, including a 20-year
)
..C Attachment to NLS9000298 page 7 of 33 5.
Continued period of license renewal? If so, how much land? When could this
' acquisition occur? Where?. (if answer is "yes", 3-4 sentences)
Response
No.
6.
To provide information on the timing of tuture low-level waste streams, if you answered yes to question #3, over what periods of time are these activities contemplated?
l
Response
Approximately 1992, 1999, 2006, and 2013.
7.
Do you anticipate any additional construction activity, on-site, or ina sdiately adjacent to the power plant site, associated with temporary LLRW storage for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-yer.r period of license renewal? (yes/no)
Response
No.
O.
If you-answered yes to question #7, briefly describe this construction activity -(e.g., storage areas for steam generator components or other snaterials exposed to reactor environment).
Response
Not applicable.
9.: To provide information on future ' low-level waste streams which may
- effect workforce levels, exposure, and waste compact planning, do you anticipate any major plant modifications or refurbishment that are likely to generate unusual volumes of low-level radioactive waste prior to, ~or during, - the relicensing period for the plant?
If so, please describe the m activities.
Also, what types of modifications do you anticipate 1 Oe necessary to achieve license renowal operation through a 20-year license renewal tenn?
Response
Currently no major plant modifications or refurbishments are expected or planned which would generate unusual volumes of LLRW prior to, or during, the relicensing period for CNS.
Waste volumes generated from routine preventative and corrective maintenance activities should remain relatively constant.
- = -
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 8 of 33 l
9.
Continue'
-Spent Fuel Pool Clean-up projects involving the burial of Class C irradiated hardware will be conducted on a once per 5 to 10 year
-frequency. Waste volumes generated from this activity will be similar i
to the volumes generated during the 1985 CNS Spent Fuel Pool Clean-up (680 Ft.").
i
)
e 54
,e 4
Attechment to NLS9000298 Page 9 of 33 AQUATIC RESOURCE QUESTIONS 1.
Post-licensine modifications and/or chances in enerations of intake And/or discharce systems may have altered the effects of the noyty niant on nouatic resources. or may have been made specifically to mitirate imoacts that vere not anticinated in the desien of the nient.
Describe
-any such modifications and/or ooerational_shances to the condenser cooline water intake and discharce systems since the issuance of the Operatine License.
Only one modification has been made to the intake structure which-involved the building of a guide wall in front of the intake structure to help reduce the deposit of sediment in this area. The guide wall is constructed of Z piling driven to rock.
The wall is set out 14 feet from the intake structure into the river and is about 276 feet in total length and extends from above the intake strveture downstream past the inlets, approximately 10 feet.
2.
Summarize and describe (or orovide documentation of) any known imonets on nouatic resources (e.c.
fish kills. violations of dischgree nermit conditions) or National Pollutant Discharee Elimination System (NPDES) gnforcement actions that have occurred since issuance of the Operatine Licence.
How have these been resolved or chanced over time?
(The Irsconse to this cuestion should indicate whether impacts are oncoine gr were the result of start-up oroblems that were subsequentiv resolved.)
Various NPDES noncompliances have occurred over the last 14 years.
The majority of the violations have been associated with two outfalls 004 and 005.
The 004 outfall discharges wastewaters from the sludge settling pond which receives wastes from the water treatment operation.
The 005 outfall was designed to discharge wastewater from the mechanical sewage treatment plant, The 005 outfall experienced several noncompliances per year from 1976 until 1987 when the discharge vu eliminated.
The mor.t common violations occurred with exeseding the permit limitations for BOD and TSS.
A Complaint, Compliance Ordt r 'and Notice of Opporcunity for Hearing (Case No. 913) was ' issued to NPPD on July 15, 1986 by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Control.
NPPD was ordered to replace the existing mechanical sewage plant with a complete retention lagoon facility.
The problem was resolved with the construction of two wastewate evaporation lagoons on August 10, 1987. The 005 designation was cificially removed from the CNS NPDES permit on January 25, 1988.
No discharges have occurred from this outfall vntil May of this year whea because of increas'ed flows from the most recent plant outage and heavy rains, wastewater had to be released to the Missouri River.
The discharge lasted apprcximately one month.
The ponds wer,e lowered down to a 2 1/2 foot level.
The discharge event was completed under direction from the NDEC.
The-004 outfall has also experienced several noncompliances since 1977 with the majority of these events occurring during 1987.
The reason for the noncompliance events is related to regulating the pH of the discharge. The levels of pH have ranged from 1.0 to 11.5 during these violations. Although no legal enforcement actions were initiated by the
i Attochment to NLS?000298 Page 10 of 33 NDEC, they did formerly request in a letter on March 24, 1987, that the District resolve the problem and submit periodic progress reports and completion schedules.
To control this problem, modifications were implemented including a pH neutralization system which was installed in August 1989.
The system is designed to control the flow and pH of water through this discharge by automatic neutralization with CO2.
Two noncompliances have occurred since this system was installed both related to viring problems within the system.
As part of the effort to eliminate the NPDES noncompliances associated with the 004 discharge, the following modifications were also completed by August 24, 1989.
1.
The clearwell overflow was rerouted to the 002B outfall.
2.
A pH-controlled isolation valve on the clearwell overflow line was installed that will divert the flow from the 002B outfall to the sludge settling pond (004) if the pH is not between 6 9.
3.
The dilute acid system which regulates the pH of the circulator effluent was automated.
4.
The auxiliary boiler blowdown was rerouted from the 002C outfall to the 004 outfall.
5.
The automated pH adjustment syntem fr the 004 outfall was installed.
Occasionally during the summer months and especially the last three summers the 001 outfall (cooling water discharge), which consists of once-through cooling water, has exceeded the NPDES permit limitation for temperature.
A few of the non' compliances have occurred due to maintenance activities, however during the last couple of years, increase ambient river temperatures have contributed to several violations.
No recorded or reported fish kills have been associated with any of the noncompliance events experienced at CNS.
3.
Chances to the NPDES vermit durinc overation of the olant could indicate whether water cuality carameters were determined to have no sienificant imunets (and were dronoed from monitorine recuirements) or were subsecuentiv raised as a water cuality issue.
Provide a brief summary of chances (and when they occurred) to the NPDES vermit for the niant since issuance of the Ooeratine License.
7-6-76 NDEC modified NPDES permit deleting requirement'for off stream cooling 9-14-79 NDEC deleted thermal plume monitoring requirement from the NPDES permit 11-7-83 No further fish impingement studies required by NDEC 2-
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 11 of 33 9-16-83 deleted iron and copper requirements for 002 outfall, pH deleted from 003, added oil and greate to 004 1-25-88 NDEC dropped 005 outfall from NPDES permit because of the construction of the complete retention lagoons 7 26 88 Add 002A (roof drains and floor drains), 002B (clear well overflow), and 002C (floor drains) outfalls to the permit adding individual monitoring locations 8-16-88 NDEC added biomonitorin6 requirement to the 004 outfall.
Required for all " major" discharges in the state.
4.
An examination of trends in the ef fects on acustic resources monitorinc can indiente whether impacte have increased. decreased. or remained relatively stable durine coeration.
Describe and suenarize (or provide documentation of) results of monitorinc of water cuality and nountic biota (c.c.
related to NPDES vermits. Environmental Technical Specifications. site-specific monitorine_,reouired by federal or state aggnetes). What trends are avoarent over time?
Preoperational ar,uatic monitoring studies were s.cnducted on the Missouri River from 1969 through 1973.
The operational aauatic monitoring program was conducted from 1973 through 1979; sinae that time no environmental studies have been conducted.
Note:
impingement / entrapment studies at the intake structutss continued through 1983. Monitoring of the aquatic system ended in 1979 because it was determined by the extensive data collected that operation of CNS had not adversely impacted the water quality or aquatic ecology of the Missouri River.
The following is a brief summary of the results of monitoring of water quality and aquatic biota, Water Quality Water quality studies in the Missouri River near CNS were conducted from 1971 through 1979.
The results from these water quality studies (1971 through 1979) indicated that water quality in the Missouri River was not adversely affected by the operation of CNS.
Watt:r quality data are attached (see Table 2.9).
Periphytor.
Preoperational baseline data on periphyton abundance, species composition, community structure, and biomass production in the Missouri River near CNS were collected in 1972 and 1973. Data on the effects of operation of CNS on the downstream periphyton community were gathered from 1974 through 1979.
All measurements of the periphyt'on community in 1979 yielded results that were within the range of value previously reported for the Missouri River near CNS (see attached Table 3.1).
Fish Impingement Fish oI the Missouri River near CNS were studied from 1970 through 1973 (preoperational) and 1973 through 1983 (operational). There has been an _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Attechment to NLS9000298 Page 12 of 33 insignificant impact on the adult fish populations near CNS due to impingement entrapment lossss.
Table 9.12 (see attached) gives the relative abundance and impingement rates of fish impinged at CNS from 1973-1977.
Table 10 (see attached) contains actual impingement numbers for fish impinged at CNS from 1978 till 1983.
Macroinvertebrates In 1972 a series of studies were initiated to provide information on the composition and abundance of macroinvertebrates in the Missouri River-near CNS.
Species composition and densities of aufwuchs and benthic communities sampled near CNS in 1979 were similar to those in previous studies.
Results of operational studies conducted from 1974 to 1979 indicate that heated water from CNS has not adversely affected aquatic macroinvertebrate populations in the Missouri River near CNS.
Table 4.1 gives a summary of macroinvertebrate occurrence in benthic and aufwuch samples near CNS from 1973-1979.
Larval Fish Entrainment Larval fish studies were initiated in 1973 to document the mechanical effects of condenser passage and the abundance and distribution of fish larvae in the Missouri River near CNS. Net-induced mortality resulting from high current velocities frequently caused intake mortalities to exceed those in the discharge; therefore, the entrainment study was discontinued in 1977 and entrainmen'. losses have subsequently been estimated with the horizontal distribution data.
Estimates for 1977 through 1979 are as follows:
1979 - An estimated 3.3% of the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
1978 - An estimated 3.7% of the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
1977 - An estimated 7.6% lof the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
Entrainment losses were probably less than the estimated entrainment rates since previous studies at CNS have shown that fish larvae can survive condenser passage.
5.
Summarize tvoes and numbers (eg. provide documentation) of organisms entrained and imoinced by the condenser cooline water system since issuance of the Ooeratine License.
Describe any seasonal natterns associated with entrainment and imoincement.
How has entrainment and imoincement chanced over time?
~
Documentation has been provided that summarizes the types and numbers of fish entrained and impinged by the condenser cooling water system during both preoperational and operational phases.
Tables 9.12, 9.13, 9.14, and 9.5 present data on the numbers of fish entrapped or impinged at CNS.
High fish impingement rates were associated with high reproduction and survival during 1975 and 1976.
Most fish impinged belonged to.
a
=
l Attachment to i
NLS9000298 Page 13 of 33 year-class O to 11.
Generally the impingement rates were highest from July through December and data shown that most of these fish were young-of-the year.
Zooplankton entrainment ctudies were conducted at CNS during 1973 (preoperational) and 197i. through 1976 (operational) to document the combined thermal and mechanical effects of condenser passage on zooplankton viability.
Estimated impact of entrainment on the total Missouri River zooplankton community passing CNS did not exceed 0.6 percent in 1976 and the previous years had similar numbers.
Species composition and seasonal changes of major zooplankton were similar during preoperational and operational studies.
Station operation has had no apparent effect on zooplankton abundance, species diversity, or summary of differential immobility and distribution.
Table 9.2 is a mortality for total zooplankton following condenser passage at CNS.
Phytoplankton species composition was generally not affected by condenser passage; therefore, the mechanical effect of condenser passage on the Missouri River phytoplankton population is considered negligible.
6.
Aountic habitat enhancement or restoration efforts (e.c.
anadromous fish runs) durine operation may have enhanced the biolocical communities in the vicini ty of the olant.
Alternative 1v. decradation of habitat or water cuan tv may have resulted in loss of biolocical resources near the site.
Describe any chances to acustic habitats (both enhancement and derradction) in the viciniry of the vower olant since the issuance of the Overatine License includinc those that may have resulted in different niant imnacte than those initially credicted.
The District has not conducted monitoring studies cince 1979, howeier, the only observed change that has occurred over the last few years is the increased ambient temperatures of the Missouri River during the summer months. Whether this has any impact on aquatic habitats is not known but it has had an impact in causing the Station to exceed their NPDES permit limitation for temperature.
7.
Plant overations may have had vositive. necative. or no innaet on the use.of aauntic resources by others.
Harvest by commercial or recreational fi she rmen may be constrained by plant operation.
Alternatively _ commercial harvestine may be relativelv 1arce compared with fish losses caused by the niant.
Describe (or vrovide documentation for) other nearby uses of waters affected by cooline water systems (e.c.
swimmine. boatine. annuni harvest by commercial and recreational fi she rie s )-
and how these imoacts have chanced since issuance of the Operatinc License.
h None of the nearby uses (commercial and recreation fishitig uses) of the Missouri River have been affected by plant operation (cooling water discharge) since the issuance of the Operating License (Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, 1990 Verbal Communication). The thermal effluent from CNS is dispersed within a short distance of the outfall, therefore, the thermally affected area of the Missouri River is small.
Chemicals are not required to clean intake water lines due to the abrasive nature 5-
Attechm2nt to NLS9000298 Page 14 of 33 of the sediment of the river. The movement of marked fish demonstrated that the thennal plume presented no barrier to the movement of fish.
8.
Describe other sources of imonets on souatic resources (e.c.
industrial discharces. other nower clants. atricultural runoff) that could contribute to cumulative inonets.
What are the relative con ibutions by nereent of these sourecs. includine the contributions due o the cover clant. to overall water cuality decradation and losses of acustic biota?
To our knowledge, the only potential source of impact introduced to this aquatic system since the issuance of CNS's Operating License is the Omaha Public Power District's Nebraska City Station, coal fired plant located approximately 30 miles upstream of CNS.
Whut effect this plant has on the cumulativa impact of the system has not. been studied or determined.
9.
Provide a copy of your Section 316(a) and (b) Demonstration Reoort reauired by the Clean Vaste Act.
What Section 316(a) and (b) determinations have been made by the reculatory authorities?
On May 4, 1976 the Nebraska Department of Environmental Control indicated the reviewing agencies (NDEC, EPA, NGPC, and USWS) concluded that the discharge of once-through cooling water had not caused any appreciable harm to the aquatic community of the Missouri River 1.nd approved the District's waiver for alternate thermal limits.
On February 2,1977 the NDEC informed the District that the CNS intake structure meets the minimum requirements of Section 316(b) of P.C.92-500 and no backfitting of fish protection was required.
The NDEC requested repot ts concerning fish impingement and entrainment be submitted to them.
On January 5, 1978 the NDEC found that the NRC impingement sampling program was adaquate for the NPDES requirements.
On November 7, 1983 the NDEC notified the District that the CNS intake structure had been designed and constructed in such a way to minimize adverse impacts on the fishery and that no further fish impingement studies were required.
The discontinuance of all thermal and aquatic monitoring studies were approved by the NRC and deleted from the Environmental Technical Specification.
A copy of the CNS 316(a) and (b) demonstration document is enclosed.
6-
i Table 2.9.
Comparison of data for selected water quality parameters from corresponding sampling periods during preoperational and operational status of Cooper Nuclear Station, 1971-79.a b.c Preo:erettoreal Date Operet tmel Det s t'pstream Dmms t r eme Urstreme D m strees Parameter Year May July October Mav Jule October Year May July Octrber May Julv Ceteber Water 1971 14.9 24.0 16.0 14.9 24.0 16.5 1974d 27.8 13.4 23.1 14.8 g
temperature 1972 16.7 24.3 12.1 16.6 24.6 12.0 1975 f
23.9 13.6 f
24.4 13.7 p
(C) 1973 15.3 26.1 17.1 14.9 25.9 16.9 1976 17.6 25.5 9.4 27.7 26.2 10.9 N
1974d
..e 20.0 1977 21.4 25.9 13.8 21.9 26.5 15.2 r-1978 18.8 26.2 11.3 19.4 24.9 12.0 El i
1979 17.3 25.0 11.7 17.0 26.2 12.2
-4 Dissolved 1971 10.4 7.0 8.7 10.0 10.0 8.9 197&d 7.3 8.7 7.2 8.9 0
oxy gen 1972 7.9 5.3 9.7 7.8 5.3 10.3 1975 8.2 6.6 9.1 7.%
6.5 7.7 2-(=g/1) 1973,
7.8 6.4 7.5 8.0 6.4 7.3 1976 6.4 6.&
9.7 6.9 6.4 9.5 m
1974d
.e 4.8 1977 6.1
$.5 9.2 6.6 5.4 9.1 Z
1978 7.6 5.9 9.6 7.8 5.9 9.7 q
1979 7.9 5.6 R.6 8.1 7.1 9.1 E
Oxy 8er 1971 102 82 87 95 118 92 1974d 91 83
?O 85 0
caturation' 1972 82 62 92 80 62 95 1975 f
79 88 74 74
~
2
(%)
1973 76 52 77 78 52 75 1976 68 85 73 87 197&d
_e 52
- 1977 70 68 80 76 6P 91 1978 83 72 88 85 72 90 m
)
197*
83 69 79 84 84 90 Z
pH 1971 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.1 197&3 8.3 8.1 8.0 8.3 8.0
-1 1972 8.0 7.7 ff. 2 8.2 8.8 8.1 1975 7.8 8.2 8.2 7.8 8.4 8.3 D
I i
1973 8.0 8.2 7.6
- 7. 9 8.2 7.6 1976 7.3 8.2 8.0 7.&
8.2 8.0 1974d
.e 8.0 1977 7.7
- 7. 9 8.0 7.7 7.9 8.1 10 1978 8.6 8.1 8.2 8.6 8.1 8.2 0
1979 82 81 S.O 8.2 8.3 8.1 m
Alkattnity.
1971 150 150 142 150 162 149 19748 160 161 158 164 Z
total 1972 171 152 157 172 145 160 1975 167 171 166 174 170 160 0
(ec/1-CACO )
1973 168 172 182 163 174 179 1976 159 155 158 158 159 158 P1 3
1974d 1,8 1977 l'0 144 162 142 158 163 (Tl 1978 172 131 156 171 130 152 1979 173 175 191 172 16K 192
=
d Turbidityt
, 1971 1'
50 42 37 41 42 1974 51 26 53 27 (N.T.U.)
1972 N
178 32 76 94 35 1975 120 54 63 110 59 17 1973 195 73 99 205 71 los 1976 295 21 23 295 23 52
.e :z: >
197ad 350 Mit 525 300 64 510 425 60
$ F
1978 50 185 35 48 190 35 e
1979 94 790 35 7R 82 35 ggOy woe N CJ O @ 3
% (D r*
Lp c9 u
O
Table 2.9.
(cont'nued)
Preaperat ional Dat a operat iona t Data Upstre =
nevnetream Upstre.=
Downstree.
Parameter
' Year "av July October Mar Julv October Year Mar July October Mae Jut, Octoher 1974d 6.1 5.3 5.9 5.6 fot,<<tum 1971 6.5 5.8 5.0 e
3,;
(=4!!)
1972 3.0 15 6.1 1975 7.7 5.3 6.6 7.7 5.3 4.7 y
- 1973, 7.0 11 10 7.0 to 1976 8.2 5.0 1.1 8.3 A.8 5.0 pg 197&*
30 1977 1&
9.6 6.1 14 9.4 6.1 r-197R 7.1 9.3 5.6 7.3 10.0 5.4 f4 8.2 13 6.1 81 7.a 4.1 "4
19,797,d g3,g g7,3 g3,9 g y, g
()
Choloride 1971 16.0 13.5 13.3
-C
-c
.c g
(mell) 1972 15.0 12.2 13.5 C
C C
1975 17.5 12.3 13.9 17.6 13.5 14.5 2[
1973 1*.2 17.0 17.1 17.1 16.3 17.1 1976 18.1 14.2 16.6 16.9 15.0 1%.3 pg 19:a8 11.0 1977 14 15 21 16 15 21
- p 1979 19 19 13 19 21 la g;
1979 18 19 19 18 18 18 203 410 203 207 33 197&d Sulfate 1971 1&O 235 177 1975 166 265 194 160 250 190 CI (es/1) 1972 130 176 133 I
1973 121 201 121 105 202 105 1976 165 189 192 til 189 193 25 197&d 110 1977 110 170 180 130 160 170 3l 1976 170 lbo 190 170 160 160 pt 1979 1 70 235 21 0 170 21 5 205
][
Amenia 1971 0.09 0.10 0.1%
0.05 0.11 0.11 197&d 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.07
-4 (mg/1-1)
!972 3.09 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.07 1975 0.06
-0.01
<0.01 0.03
<0.01
<0.01 3'
(
1973 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.03 0.06 1976 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 I"
19:45 -*
0.06 1977 0.02 0.05
-0.01 0.02 0.02
<0.01 CS 1979 0.02 0.02 0.01
<0.01 0.01 0.01
{1 1979 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.02
<0.01 0.03
=1 l
11trate 1971 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.1?
0.21 197&
0.37 0.22 0.30 0.23 2;
d l
(ma/1-1) 1972 1.13 0.70 0.26 0.75 0.90 0.29 1975 1.9 0.11 0.13 1.8 0.60 0.14 g) 1973
!.3 1.2 0.67 1.3 1.2 1.1 1976 0.59 0.11 0.16 0.56 0.10 0.16 pt 197&d 1.6 1977 0.56 0.43 0.2%
0.54 0.62 3.23 U
1979 0.30 0.34 0.40 0.77 o.35 0.37 1 979, 1.5 0.51 0.1 1.6 0.23 0.41 l
Ortho-1971 0.062 0.046 0.065 0.049 0.042 0.059 19'e' O.03a dL C59 0.035 0.069 ae :: >>
phosphate.
1972 0.069 0.030 0.047 0.039 0.069 0.06 3 1975 0.092 0.070 0.023 0.095 0.048 0.028 j$((l!
soluble
- 1973, 0.10 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 1974 0.076 0.015 0.051 0.092 0.029
- 0. 06 5 o up p
(*r/l-P) 197&*
O.23 1977 0.049 0.062 0.065 0.049 0.042 0.062
,, {j hr 147M 0.059 0.049 0.045 0 05i 0.067 0.067 en cy g b8 8 1979 0105
- 0. u '.0 0. 0 71 0.3 00 f.0 0 0.06'.
O M3 D m tr re LJ Pr LJ O'
l 1
l
\\
l l
I.
?
L2 Table 2.9.
'(continued)
?
i L
Preoperational Data Operational Data Upstream Downstream Upstreme Devnetream
{
' Parameter Year Maw Ju!v oc tcht May July OcteSer Year May July oc trtier Maw July October 197&
7.4 4.4 7.4
'4.4 d
S*,lica 1971-10
" 8.0
- B. 7 soluble 1972 12
- 7.t 9.5 12 R.0 9.7 1975 14 7.5 8.1 13'
' 7. 7
- 8.1 I.
ten /1-510 )
1973 12 9.7
' 8.7 !
12
.J 11 1976 9.1 6.5
. 9.4-9.2 6.5' 9.4
)
2 4
- 9.2 1977 12 8.8~
13 12 8.7 13 N
1974 1978 8.9 F.5
- 9. ?-
' 9. 3 7.5' 9.2 f"
1979 10.5 8.8 9.1 11.5 9.0 10.3 M
Bacteria.
1971 1100 16000 9900 1000 '15000 6000 1974 1800 2900 22000 1700 d-d O-4 f ec.1 -
1972 15000 15000 6200 20000 !17000-1800 197$' 1700 1200 4200 92000 810'.3500 2
celiform 1973 9600' 2 t>00 11000 20000 2200 9909 1976 20000 1500 5800 12000 500 4300 d
67000 1977 25000 20000
.750' 23000 12000' 4400 l
.m-(No/100ml)
'1974 1978 400 8550 4600 760 9750 8750 Z
g 1979 1275 3050 2600 945 2150 2750 d
1971 3.3 3.0 2.2.-
3.8 7.6 2.6 1974 2.5 3.0 2.2
' 3.0 Blochemical
.y t
- w exytten 1972 3.0 6.5 2.9
'2.4 4.2 3.0 1975 2.3 -
1.6 1.6 2.5 2.2 1.6 0
desand 1973 3.4-2.2 3.6' 6.4 2.4 4.1 1976 4.7~
1.2 2.6 4.5 1.0 2.6 2-F (eg/1)
'1974d
_e 5.5 1977 2.9 3.6 3.0 2.8 2.6 3.2
$:L i
1078 4.0 2.2 1.0 5.2 23 1I 1979 2.1 4.7 3.4 2.3 7.0 3.5 8
chemical 1971 25 20 14 16 25 14 1974 15 20 300 13 21 Z
d 1975~
31' 15 17 31 13 18 crygen 1*72 20 160
.12,
110 26 29 1976 69 16 12-67 14 11 de. sand 1973 43 23 31 g
(eg/1) 1974 300 1977c 99 51 7.0 98 39 7.2
+
1978' 21 33 10 21-37
'11 E
i 1979 15 110 18 18 23 18 9
i 1974 1.5 0.45 39 1.1 0.61 m
)
d tron 1971 0.75 1.9 1.7 1975 75 0.80 0.80 7.5
- 0. 85.-
0.91 Z
(er/1) 1972 3.7 102
-1.5-1973 10.8 2.1 3.5 13 2.2 3.3 1976 19.
o.61 0.94 16 0.52 0.77
.~)
d
_e 39
~1977 13 12 1.2 13 10 1.1 M
i 1974 1978 3.0 13.5 1.5 3.8 16.5 1.3 3
1979 4.7 2.8 2.8 5.1 7.2 3.1
}
7 a All values are means.
Locations Pf1534 and 528 in 1972,1973; and Locations Pfi 534 b Data from Locations 5 and-14 in 1970,1971;
? !5 %
and 530 in 1974,1979.
5SE c 1971 ; values are single samples ' and the May and July 1972 values as indicated and all remaining values 1.-e 8{
pans of duplicate samples.
i Cooper Nuclear Station operational in July 1974.
", 8.
S3E e Not determined,according to study plan.
- w f Unable to. determine.
w o
9 Turbidity prior to fiay 1975 measured in JTU.
4 Il
p
^
.. ~.
s--
Attcchm2nt to NLS9000298 HAZ1.ETON ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES Table 3.1.
Number of algal taxa and percent of total taxa by division 1" periphyton sainples collecteil f roin artificial substrates l' U
1972-79.
tilssouri River near Cooper fluclear Station.
____m.
.;. 7g _ _..___.....
D a illTa7(o'p~tifti ' *Gl o r 6j~hy t a C*y a nif)fiy t a
~
^
.Y?.af,,,,]o_.,_,,,,,\\,',]
,]o,,,, _,1.,_,,,,G.
, Tp,ta 1,,.,,,,, t{o,., o f, Samp 1,c,s, 1972 165 91.2 6
3.3 10 5.5 181 21 1973 83 84.7 9
9.2 6
6.1 98 25 1974 113 85.3 16 10.3 7
4.5 156 22 If75 70 uo.4-8 9.9 3
3.7 81 12 1976 87 82.9 13 12.4 5
4.8 105 16 a
1977 74 83.1 10 11.2 4
4.5 89 26 1978 51 78.5 11 16.9 3
4.6 65 21 1979 140 82.8 17 10.1 10 S.9 M9' 20 One rhodophyte included in total, a
One chrysophyte and one cryptophyte included in total.
b I -
53
N-Attachicent to N1,$9000298 Page 19 of 33 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES Sunnary of nacroinvertebrate occurrence in benthic (0) and lable 4.1.
aufwuchs (A)a samples from the filssourt River tiear Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
4 iv73 1974' 37F"~~~1976 1171 li7F 1979~~
~I T. ~) T _ *T T _ L T 'l T_
- Y~T~
3,,,A~~
14 son
- i 4 +
+ 4
+
Wenatode Unidentified Wematoda Aphasmidte inopitda Dorylast dee 4
Nyglelaimus sp. Cobb
_(ntdaila Hydtetoa Hydroteca e e e e 4
4 e
e e e
clavidae (ordylophore 14tustrig
~111m_a n
+ 4 4 4
+
+
- +
+ e Hydridae H dra sp. Linnaeut L
Platjhelitethe$
lurbelleria triciadida PIanariidae
+
Untoentified Planartidae 4
e e e
4 4
bugesta sp. Girard PhibiloiMla 4
Unidentified thabdotoela Wemettina (pople Hoplanemertint Prestomatidae ProStoma rubrum (Leidy)
Bryoisa e
. Unidentified Bryctos f(toproc t a Phylatolaemata f redertt ellidae
- 4 4
4 4
F redricella sultana (Bumenbach)
~ ~ ~ ~
PumatelGdae 4
Hyaline118 punctata (Hancock) intoprocta
+
Unidentified intoprotta
+
4 e
+ 4 e
Urnatellidee Urnatella g'ract115 teidy -
AnneTTda 011gochaeta Plettopore Aeolosomatidae 4
4 Aeolotoma sp. [hrneberg 4
K~~lrevancorente Atyer 4 +
+ 4
+
4 e +
4
- 4 (niTyltset.ae Unidentified techyttatidet 4
4 Waldidae 4
e Autopnorus furcatut (Huller) '
e e
D'rsitiTIli linTdenlite
+
4 tliiffo ~~
lilibTin'ils (GruithuIsen1
$ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 e e
he Y d a
e[}
e 4
+ +
+
+ e D'.~llois Terronniere 4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 Ndt5 3 M iler) 4 e - 4 4
4-e 4
+ e e 4 4
4 E.~Earbeta Muller U. IIfhE tt Muhattnen -
4 e
e e
4 e
e 4
.e 4
4 e
e e
e H.' bre'ttchert HithAciten E it===2 hts Ptquet 4
e II. ellrifuli Huller
~
+
IC il ~mplta' Piquet -
4 IC vartaEllis
+
4 4
@h'idonalI~iirpentina titu11er)
WM4WD'dm#
99 72
'm-..
Attecicatit to 002%
HAZLETON ENVinONMENTAt. DCIENCED l' age 20 of 33 Table 4.1.
(continued)
_. ie7r --,974 -- ion -- 194--- 1977 - T e7e -- is)9 -
77-772lrT-gr I r_TT 7 r i t. on_.
- e. antii trict arabe
+
4 FitsTlsi Tbiilt (riquetl FIifiUT$eWf>5urne C Taresili 5rtrber E liigTiiTe thrent, erg e
+
K 1 71FIFfi Smith 4
e e
I'.' 05 tioTnl V al t uu K 1i.i-Sla}virii jspenditulata d'Udchem e
e a
4 4
e
$(ilirle leikitIIT][Innaeus) lui,iTiiiiie i
Aulodrilut limnobius Frtt$ther 4,
4 KT)1Eiiifii.isliWi
+ e
.4 1<7encETUTi so ertyi seddard e 4 lliir(filij TiiflitEnt (southerni
~
ftmiiodrllug Cerili*lirint hurtt e e e
e e
- l. tiepatestlanut Ratac1 e
e e
e e 4 C fiif fielsi~eTI~Claparede C spiralTS TTien e
f LdiVislinus (14parede TCbTfiT~{u5ffin (Hullerl 4 +
+
+ +
+ +
4 4
liMfuie~iiTo~ iip. chaette 4
4 e
lamature w/ (ap. thsetae Frosopora Drancht obdel t idae e
Cast,artnrola mac rodonta (1115 Hirud(nca i
Rhynchohdellida Glottiphantider Unidentified Gionniphontidae Helobdella elongsta_ (Castiel j
PliiTioTTdie Hyrcitidella moorel (Meyerl
]
+
Pha ryngobdilll3T~
frpobdellidae Unidentified (rpobdeltidae e
+
+
+
Dina filooreobdellel mttrosture tioore IdIbbdellTlilihE^ulsi7}{oore ~
t
^
~~ ~~~~
ArihropIrida C ru ttacts 160poda Anellidae
+
4 e
4 Asellus sp. Hillaire
- f. Tri(crmed6us f orbe6 Anflit'p'oda
~
1411tridec
+ +
Hyalelle arteca (54ussurcl GiminarTdae 4
(tangonyf sp. Sate Cannaarug Sp. TabrlCluS livia p'u~tfa~
Astactoae
+
Utildentif ted Attattdat e
e Orcunetles sp. Lupe Aradini da~ "
Acartna 4
4 4
e e i UHidentIIled Hydrocarina losects Thytenura Jarygidae
.lapys sp.
e tullenbuIa
....-4...--
73
Attochtaent to NLS9000298 IN HAZLETON ENVinDNMENTAL BCIENCt!S Tabic 4.1.
(continted) 197T 197l ~ ~'1976
~ 197F ~ 7 177 1970~~19N * " '
~F~A~ T i~ 'lF*T~_~[1 [ _{lI1~ "V]A] ~1[%]{
Ia aen __
isotc.idae 4
isotoma sp. Bout let e
Il iEI6Fliis[alustris (nutteri 1sWoGrus iUnidentified (tht*eroptera 4
Iphemeridae (phoron Sp.
4 e
4 4
- f. a % m (Say) 4 e
Wes'aTenia sp. Walth 4
e 4 e e
e e
e IlaimlMa tierville) e FinTipali sp. Walth T iltiliera 4
ClinTiit 4 4 4
4 4
Brach tercut sp. Curtin t
4 4 e 4
+
- e 4 4
4 4 +
4 4
4 4 4
4.
. 4 trenh sp. stephens TrTcorythodes sp. Ulmer e
4 4
4 4 +
+
HefTageln Tdae UnideMilled Heptactalidae 4
4 4
4
+
Aneptorus sp. IkDunnough 4
e e
4 ifje ijemlasp.Walth e
+
- 14. 'TlaEsiTa butt t 4
e e 4
4 4
e IC'elijailula (ston 4
. 4
+
4 4 4 Wrokema sp. Trael 4
4 4
4 4 4
- e 4
'a. arts'IJrk5 II lElepry (McDunnough) 4
$7 IElery nctatum l'ayl e
5! 17Tjunc GTuTinantil Di' tTde e~ ~~ ~ '
e
+
Unleentified Battidae
+
+
4 4.
e.
. 4 Ameletus sp. (atf.,n e
+
4
+
4 4 e
4 Fie~lii~s'p. Leach isonychp sp. (ston
- 1. aurea traver 4
G ITdiiri Traver Od6EaTT-'"
e (waphidae
+ +
Unidentified Gomphidae
+ 4 e
G bus to, teach Libe rulidae 4
4 Didymort sp. Ramtiert lieurocordulia molesta Olalth!
tow I6TEIora tp~~Tiljs CEFEig7EnTdie 4
4 Unidentified (oenagrionidae 4
4 4
4 e
Argte sp. Damburs 4
Inallajma_ praeverum (Hagen) -
4 ri.lj D nura pen irv.,a b lyt ecopTee s lJemfiur idae e
leenlopterya sp. Pictet 4
reV16didiF "
Neoperta sp.
4 4
4 4
4 Ishperla tpe Fiillifie~
4 4
4 4
4 Petitsta Sp(. Danks 17'pleTida Hage n)
Ptf roKiVildae e
e Pteronarcyt sp. Nevimn F. 7p c Wtti Hagen hem ptera CoriRidae 4
4 Unidentified Corisidae Oleidae 4
'Jntdentified Pleidae
...... ~ _... _... _.. -
-. ~ ~...
74
j Attachment to 1
14LS9000298 HAZLUTON ENVinONMENTAL DCIENCED I, age 22 of 33 lable 4.1.
(c ont i.iued)
..... _ g _.. g. _.g g3_.... yy.
.g...
T A~
~D~A'
~ U " A~
I f~ A ~ E A~ ' [DI A~1h d81tl
~_
negaiopters e
Unidentifled hegaloptera (orydelidee 4
(crydalut latteillt 1rlihoii(Us Ehyatophidae e
Phyatp{ glia sp. pittet f o~ly t e nt r opt,di da t Unicentifttd Polytentropodidat e
e C y"r ne l l u b 60. tiatA 6 e
(. fiater-r.us (patsEl 4
e e
, e e e e
lieutRiipili Sp. Mct athlon HiiiiiiiTthiBee 4
e
+
e e e
- Unidentified Hydropsychidae e
e e
4 e
Cl!umatopsyQe sp. Wallewn hy!dropsyche sp. Itetet e e e e 4
e Ie.~ bitte W W s e
IC Fuinltl ots IC (Hioht 6'tu e *
- e 4
e 4 4 4
. e e e e
e e e
4 IC Fr~eW N g e
e e e e
e 4
6C iTesla n kost
+ e 4 *
- +
+ e F6 tim la flava (Hagen)
HiBicip]t il1dee Untetntitled Hydreptilidat ayles sp. Curtis An' muRipunctate Curtit k.
+ +
IGdR Dla sp.
h47t]r fitile sp. husely
. e e e e
e 4
e a
e <
ft'. iy'anii Hosely e
e e
e W utrid le Sp. Morton e
e OGitldrasp.Iston keptoteridae 4
Ceratita sp. Stevens CliRT.bunc ta tus (borbits) e
- f. transversun Olegen) e e iipJiRilli~sF~ Baras e
e
(~. (Udf'di hagen
+ e e
C 'orirTes noss e e e
k t topby(fie, (and_t de f
De(etts sp. hilachlan D 7 iiiira5 Cent (Hagen)
+
(olipiifOT Dy1tsCtdae
+
+
+
Unidentified Dyttttidae
+
D ttStu sp. tinnaeut l a t t epl)t lut L
4 6p. teeth i
46(ftlplifl fdee
+
Unidentifled Hydrophilidet livrotub sp. teach e
Gdrushussp. teach Staphyltntdae Untocritifled Staphytntdae e
Heltidtdo*
Untdentiflet Helootder e
(lmidat Unidentifted (lestdae Duhtraphia sp. Sanderson e
e e
$tencieu s sp. Duf our blit'NT(Fri dae Hetetoc erpt sp.
tipld0ptera Unidentitled tipidoptera 75
. - ---. -._~ ~.. _ - - -. _ - - -. -. _ -
At tactment to NLS9000298 HAZL.ETON ENVIRONMENTAL ECIENCES Page 23 of 33 Table 4.1.
(continued) 117J 1971" 197F 7176 1177
' I97F 197F
~
1 a a on_
~$T
- T.T
' T ""'I~
- II~K' ~ ~lf K *
li_f ~ ' V ]A, * '
i Diptera 4
e Unidentitled Dipters l'sy(hodidae l'erittaa sp. Walker 51EUTlidie e
Unidentified $lmultidae 4
4 4
4 4.
4
$lmu'tum sp.
tliTIEEEmidae
+
i 4
4 4 4
Ablabesmf r sp. Johannsen IImaliicId (Walley) e e
+
1 EE 11TI'(tinnaeust 4 4 4 e e
4 4 4
4 e e e Chironomus sp. (Helgen) fli36Tailarsus sp. stef fer
+
4 y
IU~rKany[Uilis)Pnguts(l@ew) i CEi131anyf~Ji li7aliTIfi-
. 4 e
tiTiW(opus ip. (Wulp) 4 tTFTilnitus C TiiTTvTivs gr.
4 4
4 CT Tii M aisi~ group (tinnaeus) 4 4
G U'liiin'ulitus Hacq.
4 t! TisT171Tiifta e
C TIiIriensis ~
e C Usotlalfii) sylvestris r~ TTIGIUTisii sp.
4 4 4 4 4
4 4
e 4
4 Cy~tloCTiltonomus sp. (kief f er) 4 C. LTarIna (T67nes)
G diettalus Halloch 4
4 4
+
4 C rulisi~J6hannsen 4
C En'diiosus ($ublette)
+
+ +
h,tiliTdliistena
+
4 near TiemTiryptochirontmus sp.
4 4 nearD.senstrsus(thernovskit)
+
cear E ii11T TrTrpstshereon 4
meer D~ illI61ettkli (Ccetghebuer) 4 4
4 4 4 4
Dicrolin3Tres sp. Tieffer D. mcdestuslay 4
Isd3iEIF6sc~aut 5p. tieffer
+
4 4
TUITiT(e7 tit 17 sp.1htenemann 4
e 4
4 C1fpT31Tn~cT3is sp. ttelter
+ 4 e
U. TiiTTp. l~ef f er C 1rWtotendipesi sp. coetghebever e
+
+ 4 4 +
Ilirnischia sp. (ETetter) e e
e Fydr~oFienu,s sp. Brundin LaFWa317.Ti ptinse11a (Loew)
+
4 4 4 4
+
4 e e
4 4
Larsta sp. Fittkau l'~~decolorata (Malloch) e
+ +
4 iTicischTiiiiivt sp. tieffer 4 +
4 4 4 4 e 4 4
IIIeropsectra sp. s tef fer 4
4
+ 4 e e e
4 4 e e lianotlIIIsi~5p. tief f er
+
+
if'~4noersent Saethe'
+ +
+
4 4
e e
IfrtKdiiid17s iss) sp. (Wulp) 4 farachironomus sp. tens
+
4 F.'abortivus IM411och)
+
4 C Lectinisillae (Dendy & Sublette)
+
IIraclI35filma sp. Harnisch Fi7ilauterborntella sp. tent 4
4 4
+
e 4 +
4 FaTaViiTfi71s113 TF. Ithienemann) 4 Paraphaenoili'dTJs Thienemann 4
4
- paratanytarsuTip. Kief f er 4
4 Firatendires near connettens tipina 76
Attachment to IES9000298 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEG 3, m 2te of 33 Table 4.1.
(continued)
_6_7 3_ 3,_7.f_-'ll7 5_.
1U_6 _ _ TU_ 7_ _197f.. _197_ (F_~..
16
_._ - g g
.g_ g g
p 3,,,,
. ~.
Polypedilum (ts) sp.
. +
+ +
+,
. +
t~lsiT'ii>nsifium* gr. (waiter) 4 IT Tsil 'illlisiirsi' type I! Tis) ITeium-(Hilgent T! lirl 'iiilienov gr. (schrant)
+.
4
+
P! isii 'stEliiigr. Itunes
+.
4 4
4.
Noiliaius sp. 5Gse T71tT6illus (Loew)
Fieilii>ciadivi sp. Itlef f er)
+
+
iseu.'ochTiiK65us Malloch riisddimTtiTi Tp.
+
iiiii'TiW36IInittia Goe19hebut Sheocili6f6 pus sp. (1hlenemann
+
+
+
+
Tilarnisch)
< +
- +
e +
e e
+ +
+ +
e,
Rhectany~ tarsus sp. Bause
+
Udaill4 cliifger (Icwnes)
+
551(iTa'sp. Holingren 5tenochironomus sp. Elef fer 4
+
TiEy us sp.
TIl)sil tieopunttipennis Lublette
+
+
T Tii) iTncipinnis Goen
+
+
T! Tij sTi1Tatus Lucultiett linit.rsussf'Wip TEFenemannte11a sp. Eief f er
+
+ +
+ +
+
4 TnienemannliiiiTi group fittsau 1rtssociadius sp. (tief f er) 4 e
YTniihironomas ( Anceus) sp. Rot.ack Y'~(AT)~taTn b otus 1$ip)
(iIalhbobbidae Unidentifled Ceratopgonidae Dolichopodidae Untoentifled Dolithopodidae Impid.dae
+
4 e
Unidentified lepididae
+
Hea.erodromia sp. Helgen e-
+ e 4
e
+ +
e e
liEy'difdI I e
+
beoscatella sp. M*))och fiirliaar u
Unidentilted itpolidae e
Heaatoma sp. Latreille f L'u sEidie~
Unicentifief Muscidae e
Unicenttfled Anthomyttdae Mollusca Gastropoda Pulesona ta l'hy s t da e 4
fbyse sp. Draparnaud l'elecypoda Heteroconta Sphaer1idae
+,
$phaertum sp. Scopoll lotal 40 121 M !??
56 82 (8 87 49 B2 55 71 57 9u a 1972-74 from !(ilsenhoff artificial substrates, 1975-79 from multiplate plate Samplers.
77
),
At t achtnent to o
d NLS9000298 l' age 25 of 33 8
d
- b k Ei k i 5 h ~- 5gg b7
' )a [beC5 f
f I
E g
truet ce ci-erer err e r b
l
.l J
E 0 &
4 s.,
..em
,r i.
y Cfg e...
r-t te
.....gre.
eg:
1 i
r l
f d
I
{ r
- n ' -
l, c
$ g " ^ 0 ;t 7 "-
1 t
J j
j 2, m z. r, m.. z. r. r n t. =..,t. n..,. n.. u. n. -
j 3, 1.. t :
n r
- 5 7
t w
1
- s.
3 1
')
e r
I Y
e4
..,-t,
,-.._,.~~e.n.....,
.,I h.)
[D#"(#C
$ [ f, D '
C y $2 C
I.
c
'E
+
h
-t - " p " a -tt.t"r.r.ur, s q " E I
)
t
. l. '.
..E '
g i,
l.
r 3,,
)
I J
n I
I b
- 't.
~i!
I t
1 i
t a-
,p g
(
j y I
J)4 i-c E
at $ w
.i s elf l
E h
,w s; -
u] mi.dj*delu ]wmd n l
w';
4 i a l. u m ~ u w.3 n. w. a.
, a, i l
i
?IM
-l st 6
s
'O
} k.'
I Wi-1 2,
u. -. -. ; ;-
e
-~~ " ^ -
Atttchment to
\\
NLs9000298 Page 26 of 33
< " e g "9 W L [
9ft"
- .< ers
- t EH i 3
I W 1, u l,i
(,
i hk
[
h ii E
2 5 a l ft 4 f
L,,
A
'I b
.t E, d.u. n n n _.E EL n I r
i
?,
i r.
n esew
.' {.
C D
,,!f, _ _ _
w _ i. is e e o++-
t' si f
P.,
"I y
3 "p
g g,e C (5 C C E
DO i
yg g ; tt i. v. T V S 2 3 t '18 8 e
E t
m 2
c J,
.j _; g
~
t 1
$ 5 * *,
- S 5 " U '.
- f! '
{
S e
s,
'[,
i.
r
?
Fji E,,
- g,.
es e ese E
e
, 35 e asas ss=
,,4
\\,)
M
_m---_-.m_m__mm_.__
e' Attechment to N1.S9000298 Page 27 of 33 Table 10 Summary of actual fish impinged at CNS from 1978 till 1983 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982
- 1983 l
Gizzard Shad 125 171 92 195 473 19 Goldoyo 3
3 9
11 4
2 Carp 17
?9 12 15 17 2
River Carpsucker 2
5 10 23 24 Smallmouth Buffalo 3
1 12 3
Channel Catfish 5
1 6
1 3
2 Flathead Catfish 1
5 3
5 2
White Bass 2
11 1
5 Freshwater Drum 66 38 89 30 66 Shovelnose Strugoon 1
Paddlofish 1
Shortnoso Gar 2
1 2
Longnoso Gar 1
Unidentified Minnow 29 2
11 2
Bigmouth Duffalo 1
1 1
2 3
Unidentified Bullhead 1
1 Unidentified Crappio 3
1 Sauger 1
1 1
Unidentiflod Gar 1
Bluogill 1
1 1
1 Unidentified Spoclas 1
Black Dullhoad 2
2 Largemouth Bass 2
1 Unidentified Catfish 3
6 3
2 2
Unidentified Sunfish 1
1 White Crappio 6
1 Black Crappio 1
Blue Sucker 1,
1 Whito Perch 1
1
~
Total 264 270 261 287 618 36
- 1983 contains only 6 months of data impingmont data was collected for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 2 times a month l
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 28 of 33
[02"Fh"e5p.[5EEEBaB;fgEx3Pe*,'2'q 2 5 a 1 " Q N.p:
E
%5 A~5FE e-afr*F'a'est
~
ric tEjih!!g a2d g 5 5 a
P N [I r [Eh B ;l 5
r 25EgiUGB[33,!18ensa#Ii: O H R.S!iE @ E}-ls[T
!E c
il 5
% a-a uE E 8& T r $ $ " [ ] i 2 C ' $ $,. r a.r.a. r* 2 t a a I.4< E ~a *E E
- n t
5 E4
-2ab 8
n Tt"^
I' yap'E;jg&a n
v TgK 2 E24 ; 1E0
-o si l 3 F E D d.n e nQEgoRA
[
E4 r v 0
- ~
c>Ec R-i[tieI;f 7r5sRR!aig i
,F & { R !, r -
{T 9;[Ej t DE
! e.
E s t !.
~_
g r
catf3 a
. a. e r + o x.l.d a t.;n., m ( c rt r a :
e-n ^3 o O,.a r a
-om ew
- u.,
a x n L.
g e
te
,a*
g-e
=s L
zo
n 5g 3
e y g y hg h
e a
m r.
awa4 L:T '5 k k - 4 x 1' n c L
-a *c4 cr E' c he a
E
& % g. g e.
. O T
Dc e.. - E P
E E iF ~ 3 [ E '.E ~
i k
'E E a R,$e n$ g g E {
p a
t r I v,g E p i-E 2 i j a " n s E I.R g.3,[m T a
- e. E e.@' t e [' t, R.B
- cn-ch g~agije 5
n
, a r e y-1 a.a b v3
,9 3
5 t
g-vat se xss-
=
rg ss g
ve-co,u m w :; g.g
.a et
- r. 2 e g -.
ta h e $ ^ e r g ( 3 g r.: r.g_
e::;
. p T -[ "p J ex-
,w"-- [ 4 +7 $ 5Out a
a_-
3 g*'
=,
Ex 7 1-n n R
n - 5 ** ^* 5 6.
~ h; s T [,,[ si t { -[ t a s" e. [ n s k y 3 ;v h" 1 "p" h.r E'- mnt a
e "ya m-6 o
4x IeR x e/ > b E c;ru ;2g[IS!r ;R$E$g o"F) atIl,gbsR2 h,E 9
e a
"n*
c E
-43 f
l['v[t
,"in s m 2 :. s e ae N " h I1.a E,. h 2 I I I',[ n.
bb2 ke E
E 8
E
.E 7
=gE eta.
e --
.n-a x 3-i
- c. g y 's u +- - n.L a-
.s s [ g,
^ g g h g o E Q 4 p r, g.g ].r " g,< g g
{-g mr n
a n
5 a
E-m vu
- r trwcircE4, a, g e = a n, gc-5aE g{ a, &maE;ta,,ya t
g;E "e,
E
.(,
Drw;LEEEa n
3 5 -
E :' 5 a ?. ! 5 5' (7,, t e
~E k b { 3 "l gg i Esaaa m
x^ gL i" 845 8g5 7., 5 0 g ~ y T q '
E. k 5
B k i e f =E I b ic [ ! I E R E E E E L! G E I5 E?'
eo#ET ggPEp.J.x[t Y E6'or-}p~onI U
0nEesga gf4 f
E c. :c,r a m
.' s ) 'a, b 6 n
e_:
Fp tSe.e_c r" ai vo ag h5EE3 6 i 5 ;-
? t a[ r l i t 5 v a r2 M;,s g en,271 a
n 3e Er s3Etaf aEff "b
F Qf5 r7 a i r 9 r 5 a[ u a n a ; E " f ;
5, o r a r s # c a.
., t & A ! ! p r e.
a m8 4 is O;U4h"M
$J
,)
O w I.e;g a-r vr*
4 - 6 H-p.
p t
7
'4f'/9X(I{f{(,_ {v s { r n Q r ) 5 9 " " E' a 7 Eo'b'Cgey %),
$ bN
-nC M
n
${)!".-gng5 f
{ x i - ' *-
F C
54?EgEEc,7ve p
BT((Dd
" rE I*5$,ktf.eAp>c i"
'4
- L 2E
~*"
- n. L m n,:
5 f.r - m.t.e, ? % 0
- s. ;.... -
1 r
e-
$.. $ n43h#k Y-g p { f.
,f,i I y ' { g p".,E[YQQ,e.p@
y B,G
- b. 3 T - a 7 D
.... = p g o g "*, E O
UIEU
?
i Y KT h Ig 3,, "u 3. i.e
- e. -
.1
-maa..18""
.f.
,l i,..O o E O. -
-E' "o 's R c tm 5-yn - n o
en 4 "o
- f,
- y [ $ sc a u +- 0 nO f'
n p
b E:: 7 uws o
3 l + 5 U
- E N II aa w-q w c.
k Q 3 in 8
yg E
G y ni ge d"5e",t{rostsE tem tB taae nc-
.l E. E,ka5 L "e,'[
aas
- e. - =
- e. n :I n yT; H h 1't e
s c L E S h 9 :e' r e a
r-m ee,1
, ne e m a orn en n
oww$
~,,.
~. 2 Is 2.,
m zh?yLe n.m v
"e 9 a ;, 2" _-v. g [ N g.,. B v
o c D ^ 3 - 4 ',
-. O '
w
- l E-e U [,
E'3g#RR
?!D t g' H i H H U R $. 1 tg1alnay5La}g E a e, v
g s 1, g 3 i,a e g !h*' t u i E
. G-E E
a n
n n-r
+
su ;a,f s,
F m E' 7 -
c
'-2pa
- g-
- ; *r_
s
%E j
v.
M,,9,..--+-amnan g.
v w
hC w7^
j sae; e
'-P l
h L F v E k h x "g c u,.,
d i i..
ns gen
- 1., - m n
'" S,E T C* $
- Ti ^.s.E 5.t'4dt+we E
Ik 5
h5
]E653E!EE9vEap e-npa ah  for total zooplankten folleAng condenser passage at Cooper Nuc ear Table 9.2.
s Station. 1973-76.
.o e.
t-Q to'6 1"3 p* '. m ' *
- O 8
1974 etf reve c sst weeer 19?3 Te=r+cetweetC1 temet ti t t y f%et si tty T v reeweeffl bw-f il te.f=t.c nt t er Te=:=e-store M
- '.,ee li t t - /% + e t t re wc ee est r eeen te n r
Dattercettes water wh ow a =v passneeze aT o kr a s.e St ee were aT ow e *r proche*t*
9 **
C a
Jesw.t t! t t y f% ret eilt e 13.6 23.&
6.0" 9.9
.9 21.0 2.1
- 8. 7
(
rebremey 82.8 12.2 7. 5*
2.2 21.9 1? 6 1.4 4.2 Q
Jmer a
0 8
13.7*
13.6 13.0
- 3. 3 I9 7
l
- e cc h 6.9 1.8 7.3' 6.G' 13.3 13.3 7.7 17.0 11.3 41 0.4 29.3 36.0 2.0 6.6*
4 I
210 2.3 12.7*
11.t*
26.1 e.e 6 te 3.3 26.3 6.3 12.6' 24.3*
Q,
f Are11 8
11.1' O.S 33.0 7.3
- f.3 7.le 27 0 7.3 II.G*
9.7' 31.3 13.1 6.8 6.6 A
- ar N
J.ly 9.9' 9.1*
21.3 3.3 13.6' la.3*
31.9 9.4 31.6' 19.6 73.3 8.9 3.9 13.3' hee r-w 12.2' 8.r' 31.3 S.7 33.3*
6
33.4 9.6 34.2*
2L a*
36.3 9.0 12.2e 7,,
g h
19.3' 2.3 27.0 9.0 21.7*
7.I' 21.1 3.0 0.0 2.5 29.8 T. 3 8.Ut 0.0 Aoteet a
october 3.3
- 0. 3 21.6 9.9 66 3.2 g
Sept wr 0
C IL9 7.9 4.1 2.3 16.3 13.0 C.6 1.0 m
8 9.2 6.9' 11.2*
17.0 10.0 6.0 e
24 17.5 ta.0 7.F 7.t*
26.0
'6.0 11.9c
- 9. 7' g
her 10.3 8.8 g.s 6.1 7.3 becab+r 7.1 3..
s.,
6.6 I
9.3 2
3.c ai f: e mwe.1, ee=
a F. eat not transferred across condensers.
on v o :-
b Sa:ples not ecliected.
~oa (P s 0.05) based on chi-square analyses.
es et o@ 5 C Significant
- O2 e-
%s e
La C
k
httachment to 6
s NLS9000298 Page 32 of 33 SocloEcotioMIC OUESTIotis 1.
To understand the importance of the plant and the degree of its socioeconomic impacts on the local region, estiinate the number of permanent workers on-site for the most recent year for which data are available.
Restense:
In early 1990 there were 394 full time District employees on-rite.
2.
To understand the importance of the plant to the local region, and how that has changed over time, estimate the average number of permanent workers on site, in five-ycar increments starting with the issuance of the plant's operating License.
If possible, provide thin information for each unit at a plant site.
Restense t Year Pull Time District EmploYecs 1974 108 1979 230 1985 235 1990 394 3.
To understand the potential impact of continued opera *.icn for an additional 20 years beyond the original licensing term, please provide for the following three cases:
A) a typical planned outage; B) an ISI outage; and c) the largest single outage (in terms,of the number of workers involved) that has occurred to date an estimate of additional workers involved (for the entire outage and for each principal task), length of outage, nonths, and year in which work occurred, and cost.
Also, estimate occupational donos received by permanent and temporary workers during each principal task.
Reshonso:
The District does not dif forentiate between a typical planned outage and an ISI outage. They are treated as equivalent in the response below:
y
--m r.,
.,y
,r..
,~,,
_,m.~
+
.t Attcchtunt to HIS9000298 Page 33 of 33 4
Case A and B These outages typically last approximately 10 weeks and for the last 3 years have taken plico in the early spring.
Data for the last 3 outages is as follows:
l Collective Doso Jeg Time Period Total Contract Personnel Oncito (All Personnel) 1900 Mar. 5-June 17 683 193 Person-Rom 1909 Apr. 8-June 15 883 296 Person-Rom 1990 Mar. 3-May 5 1066 302 Person-Hem No data on costs is readily available.
Case C The largest single outage occurred from September 15, 1904 to August 20, 1905 and involved, among other things replacement of the recirculation, Residual Heat Re:noval, Core Spray and Reactor Water cleanup system pipe due to ICSCC. This outage utilized 2076 total contract personnel on site and approximately 1900 person-rem of collective dose was received.
- 4. -To understand the plant's fiscal importance to specific jurisdictions, for 1900, 1985, and the latest year for which data are available, estimate the entire plant's taxable assessed value and the amtunt of taxes paid to the state and to each local taxing jurisd)ction.
Response
Linder Nebraska State law, the District f.s a political subdivision of the state and is exempt from taxation by the state and local government.
Consequently, there is not tax amount directly associated with the Cooper Nuclear Station. The plant payroll for,1990 was greater than $14,00,000.
In terms of the plant's taxable assessed value, reports are prepared for insurance purposes which identify both book cost and a calculated replacement cost using the Handy-Whitsnan Index.
The replacement cost of for insurance purposes and may not be a realistic assessment of replacement cost for an identical facility today. Dcta from these reports is as follows:
Year Book Value Replacement Value 1980
$408,362,692
$ 583,541,A23 1985
$444,732,885
$ 815,952,8B2 1989
$618,322,764
$1,104,050,680 i
[y
)
'o e
Attachment to NLS9000298 page 9 of 33 AQUATIC RESOURCE QUESTIONS 1.
l'nat licensine ned111c a tions and/or changts in operations of intake And/or discharge j,y1Lgin;Jany have altered the ci,1ctt s of tht_ power plan (
en_anualic resouregs. or may hnye been itndr 1p.tt111rallx_to..mfliggt,c 11 tracts that_ vere not and,glpated in the design of the tilant.
DugIlla guy.,_guch modificatientand/or operational chances to the condenser gnnlint. wat tL intate and discharre svu t ett s since the istunnee of ti e t
Operatint Licensh Only one modification has been inade to the intake structure which involved the building of a guide wall in front of the intako structure to help reduce the deposit of sediment in this area.
The guide wall is constructed of Z pilint; drive, to rock.
The wall is set out, 14 feet frote the intake structure into the river and is about 276 feet in total let.gth and extends from above the intake att ucture downstream past the initts, approximately 10 feet.
~
2.
Eurnmarire__ and de cribe f or o,Iny.ide documentation of) any known igpag.La on acuatic resources (e c.
fish hills. viointions of disthargg_pngh T2D41tions) or National Pollutant Discharty Elimination System (NPDEM En12XRtatut netions that have occurred since issunnee of the_.QELIA1.ing th gn,been re=olved or chnnetd nypr time?
(The LigtntL,lipy have t
Lehtonse ro this aggirion should indigAte_whether igginct s are onroinr or were the result of start-uo oroblems that vere E.uhatqutDtlv rejolved.)
Various NPDES noncompliances have occurred over the 1rst 14 years.
The majority of the violations have been associated with two outfalls 004 and 005.
The 004 outfall discharges wastewaters from the sludge settling pond which receives wastes from the water treatment operatlon.
The 005 outfall was designed to discharge vastewater from the mechanical sewage treatment plant.
The 005 outf all experienced severa; noncompliances por year from 1976 until 1987 when the discharge was eliminated.
The most common violations occurred with exceeding the permit limitations for BOD and TSS.
A Complaint, Conipliance Order and Notice of Opportunity for llearing (Case No. 913) wa issued to NppD on July 15, 1986 by the Nebraska Department of Environtnental Control.
dpfD was ordered to replace the existing mechanical sewage plant with a coitiplete retention lagoon facility.
The problem was resolved with t.he construction of two wastewater evaporation lagoons on Au6ust 10, 1987, The 005 designation was officially removed from the CNS NPDES permit on January 25, 1988.
No discharges have occurred from this outfall until tiny of this year when because of increased flows from the most recent plant outage and heavy rains, wastewater had to be released to the Missouri River.
The discharge lasted spproxima%1y one month.
The ponds were lowered devn to a 2 1/2 foot level,
' he discharge event was completed under direction irom the NDEC.
The 004 outfall has also experienced several noncompliances since 1977 with the majority of these events occurring during 1987.
The reason for the noncompliance events is related to regulating the pil of the discharge. The Icvels-of pil have ranged f rom 1.0 to 11.5 during these violations, Although no Icgal enforcemenc actions were initiated by the
e e
Attachment to NLS9000298 page 10 of 33 NDEC, they did formetly request in a letter on March 24, 1987, that the District resolve the problem and submit periodic progress reports and completion schedules.
To control this problem, modifications vere implemented including a pH neutralization system which was installed in August 1989. The system is designed to control Lhe flow and pit of water through this discharge by automatic neutralization with CO2.
Two noncortpliance s have occurred since this systen, was installed both related to wiring problems within the system.
As part of the effort to elitninate the NPDES noncompliances associated with the 004 discharge, the following modifications were also completed by August 24, 1989.
1.
The clearwell overflow was rerouted to the 002B outfall.
2.
A pil. controlled isolation valve on the cicarwell overflow line was installed that will divert the flow from the 002B out fall to the sludge settling pond (004) if the pil is not between 6 9.
3.
The dilute acid system which regulates the pit of the circulator effluent was automated.
4.
The auxiliary boiler blowdown vss rerouted from the 002C outfall to the 004 outfall.
5.
Thn automated pil adjustment system for the 004 outfall was installed.
cecasionally during the stumer months and especially the last three stunmers the 001 outfall (cooling water discharge), which consists cf once through cooling water, has exceeded the NPDES permit limitation for temperature.
A few of the noncompliances have occurred due to maintenance activities, however during the last couple of years, increase ambient river temperatures have contributed to several violations.
No recorded or reported fish kills have been associated with any of the noncompliance events experienced at CNS.
3.
Chances to the NPDES normir durinc operatien pf the nlant could indicate whether water cualf tv narameters were determined to have no significant; 1moacts (and were drorned from monitorinc tr.fmireg3nt.gL,_p,I.. we re subseauentiv raised as a water cuality issue.
Provide a brief summary ri sWanges (and when they occurred) to the NPDES nermit for the plant since issuance of the Operatine License.
7 6 76 NDEC modified NPDES permit deleting r*quirement for off stream cooling 9 14 79 NDEC deleted thermal plume nonitoring requirement trom the NPDES permit 11-7 83 No further fish impingement studies required by NDEC 2
0 4
Attachment to N1.S9000298 page 11 of 33 916 83 delt,ted iron and copper requirernents for 002 outfall, pli deleted from 003, added oil and grease to 004 1 25 88 NDEC dropped 005 out f all frorn NPDES permit because of the construction of the cortplete retention lagoons 126 88 Add 002A (roof drains and floor drains), 002B (clear well overflow), and 002C (floor drains) outfallo to the permit adding individual monitoring locations 8 16 88 NDEC added biomonitoring requirement to the 004 outfall.
Required for all arcajor" discharges in the state.
4.
An examination of trends in the effects on mountic resources monitorinn r,ap indicate whether imonets have increased. decreased. or remaind relatively stable durinc coeration.
Describe and sammarize (or provide documentatLon of) results of monitorint of water riuality and aountic biota (c.c.
related to NPDPS oermits. Environmental Technical Seccifications. site spr: ific monitorine reautred by fderal or state acencies).
Wh_a t trends are nonarent over ting 2 prooperational aquatic inonitoring studies were conducted on the Missouri River frotn 1069 through 1973.
The operational aquatic monitoring program was conducted frorn 1973 through 1979; since that time no environmental studies have been conducted.
Note:
iropingersent/ entrapment studies at the intake ntructures continued through 1983.
Moaltoring of the aquatic system ended in 1979 because it was determined by the extensive data collected that operation of CNS had not adversely impacted the water quality or aquatic ecology of the Missouri River.
The following is a brief summary of the results of monitoring of water quality and aquatic biota, Water Quality Water quality studies in the Missouri River nnar CNS were conducted from 1971 through 1979.
The results from the e water quality studies (1971 through 1979) indicated that water quality in the Missoari River was not adversely affected by the operat;on of CNS.
Water quality data are attached (see Table 2.9).
Periphyton Preoperational baccline data on periphyton abundance, species corrposition, community structure, and biomass production in the Missouri River near CNS were rollected in 1972 and 1973.
Data on the effects of operation of CNS or the downstream periphyton community were gathered from 1974 through 1979.
All incasurements of the periphyton community in 1979 yielded reanits that woro within the range of value previously reported for the Missouri River near-CNS (see attached Table 3.1).
-Fish Impingement Fish of the 'tissouri River near CNS were studied from 1970 through 1973 (preoperatianal) and 1973 through 1983 (operational).
There has been an
-3
e e
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 12 of 33 insignificant impact on the adult fish populations near CNS due to impingement entrapment losses.
Table 9.12 (see attached) gives the i
relative abundance and impingement rates of fish impinged at CNS from 1973 1977. Table 10 (see attached) contains actual impingement numbers for fish impinged at CNS frota 1978 till 1983.
Macroinvertebrates In 1972 a series of studies were initiated to provide information on the composition and abundance of macroinvertebcates in the Missouri River near CNS.
Species composition and demities of aufwuchs and benthic communities sampled near CNS in 1970 were similar to those in previous studies.
Results of operational studies conducted from 1974 to 1979 indicate that heated water froin CNS has not adversely affected aquatic macroinvertebrate populations in the Missouri River near CNS.
Table 4.1 gives a summary of in:.croinvertebrate occurrence in benthic and aufvuch samples near CNS from 1973 1979.
Larval Fish Entrainment 1
1.arval fish studies were initiated in 1973 to document the mechanical effects of condenser passage and t e abundance and distribution of fish 5
larvae in the Missouri River near CNS.
Net. induced mortality resulting from high carrent velocities frequently caused intake mortalities to exceed those in the discharge; therefore, the entrainment study was discontinued in 1977 and entrainment losses have subsequently been estimated with the horizontal distribution data.
Ea tin.a te s for 1977 through 1979 are as follows:
1979 An estimated 3.3% of the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
1978 An estimated 3.7% of the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
1977 - An estimated 7.6% of the larval fish passing the station were entrained.
Entrainment losses were probat ly less than the estimated entrainment rates since previous studies at CNS have shown that fish larvae can survive cot. denser passage.
5.
Summarite tvoes and numbers (or provide documentation) of ornanisms entrained and imninced by the condgnger cooline water system since issuance of the Operatine Licensem Describe arv nensonal untterna associated with cntrainment and imninnement.
How has entratIEtut and imninrement chanced over time?
Documentation has been provided that summarizes'the types and numbers of-fish entrained and impinged by the condenser cooling water systern during both preoperational and operational phases.
Tables 9.12, 9.13, 9.14, and 9.5 present data on the munbers of fish entrapped or impinged at CNS.
High fish impingement rates were associated 'rith high reproduction and survival during 1975 and 1976.
Most fish impinged belonged to 4
Attachment to NLS90002;8 Page 13 of 33 year class 0 to 11.
Oe-rally the impingement rates were highest from July through December and data shows that most of these fish were young-of the year.
Zooplankton entrainment studies were conducted at CNS during 1973 (preoperational) and 1974 through 1976 (operational) to document the combined thermal and mechanical effects of condensor passage on zooplankton viability.
Estimated impact of entrainment on the total Missouri River zooplankton community passing CNS did not exceed 0.6 percent in 1976 and the previous years had similar numbers.
Species composition and seasonal changes of major zooplankton were similar during preoperational and operational studies.
Station operation has had no apparent effect on zooplankton abundance, species diversity, or distribution.
Table 9.2 is a summary of differential immobility and mortality for total zooplankton following condenser passage at CNS.
phytoplankton species composition was generally not affected by condenser passage; therefore, the mechanical effect of condenser passage on the Missouri River phytoplankton population is considered negligible.
6.
Aaustic habitat enhancement or restoration efforts (e.c.
anadromous fish runs) durine operation may have enhanced the biolonien1 communities in the vicinity of the vlant.
Alternatively. degradation of hnbitat_ n vater cuality may have resulted in loss of biolorical resourcen near the site.
Descrihe any channes to nountic habitats (both enhancement and dryyidation) in the vicinity of the nover niant since the issuance of the Operatine License includine those that may have resulted in different niant innacts than those initially predicted.
The District has not conducted monitoring studies.since 1979, however, the only observed change that has occurred over the last few years is the increased ambient temperatures of the Missouri River during the summer months. Whether this has any impact on aquatic habitats is not known but it has had an impact in causing the Station to exceed their NPDES permit limite* ion for temperature, 7.
Plant operations may have had nositive. nerative. or no innact on the use of aauntic resourecs by others.
Harvest by commercial or recreational fishermen mnv be constrained by plant operation.
Alternatively commercial harvestine may be relativelv 1arge comngred with fish losses caused by the niant.
Describe (or nrovide documentation for) k*-hM nearby uses of waters affec,cd by cooline water systems (e.c.
swimmine. boatine. EDunal harvest by commercial and recreational fisheries) and how these innacts have chanced since issuance of the Operatine License.
None of the. nearby uses (commercial and recreation fishing uses) of the Missouri River have been affected by plant operation (cooling water discharge) since the issuance of the Operating License (Nebraska Game and parks Commission, 1990 Verbal Communication).
The thermal effluent from CNS is dispersed within a short distance of the outfall, therefore, the thermally affected area of the Missouri River is small.
Chemicals are not_ required to clean intake water lines due to the abrasive nature 5-
~
- _, ~ _
"w2 Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 14 of 33 of the sediment of the river.
The tnovernent of marked fish demonstrated that the thermal plume presented no barrier to the movement of fish.
8.
Describe other sources of imoacts on nouatic resources (e.c.
Indug. trial discharces. other nower lants. arricultural runoff) that could contribute to cumulative imoacts.
Vhat are the relative contributions by cercent of these sources. includinn the contributions due to the power plant. to overall water m ality denradation and losses of acuatic biota?
To our knowledge, tha only potential source of impact introduced to this aquatic system since the issuance of CNS's Operating License is the Omaha Public Power District's Nebraska City Station, coal fired plant located approximately 30 toiles upstream of CNS.
What effect this plant has on the cumulative impact of the system has not been studied or de te rtained.
9.
Provide a coov of your Section 316(a) and (b) Demonstration Renort reouired by the Clean Vaste Act.
What Section 316(a) and (b) determinations have been ende by the reculatory authorities?
On May 4, 1976 the Nebraska Department of Environmental Control indicated the reviewing agencies (NDEC, EPA, NGPC, and USFWS) concluded that the discharge of once through cooling water had not caused any appreciable harm to the aquatic community of the Missouri River and approved the District's waiver for alternate thermal limits.
On February 2, 1977 the NDEC informed the District that the CNS intake structure meets the rainimum requirements of Section 316(b) of P.C. 92 500 and no backfitting of fish protection was required.
The NDEC requested reports concerning fish impingement and entrainment be submitted to them.
On January 5, 1978 the NDEC found that the NRC impingement-sampling pr?
2.n was adequate for the NPDES requirements.
On November 7, 1983 the Q EC notified the District that the CNS intake structure had been designed and constructed in such a way to minimize adverse itnpacts on' the fishery and that no further fish -impingement studies were required.
The discontinuance of all thermal'and aquatic monitoring studies were approved by the NRC and deleted from the Environmental Technical Specification.
A copy of the CNS 316(a) and (b) demonstration document is enclosed.
6-
_m.
e e
Attachment to NieS9000298 HA2L.ETON ENVIRONMENTAL ScinNCES Page 15 of 33
- 4 M
e
- 4. t. o.s o g o. o. e.. v.i e4 6. s.
- o. m. O.
4 e,
^L oa n ie
,,e, e% O.na4,,4 es. a p. c, e e er 4 e e, p, wwwww. -
ee.#4 e
o.o.,-
. b, e,
-n w
m et m-e c.
eu e-e o e-o e
4
.n e en y-en 4 *n an i
, y o
-me.
q L
F O'
.. # d '^
u e
r w.4 e4. ".s.,,',a.a.e.,
en. - 4. e s u.~
- w. 4 e
e4 + # en v3 e o p.
s
.e.w w
u, es, < -.o awoO u en 4 e ra
- w i en ee' *$ Uraaw LJ m
e 4 c4 e4eet#4 ee g A e.
.a e vi a e y,
e -s s e a e.,
n
.s e CD o
s e.
+
1 e ~. d. 4. c'.-
E. o. +. w. e 4
- o. is.
- 4. r* 4.. e v. e 4,-.,,
e-- en w
lr, we en L
- e t * ** o.
e
- e o e,.
a m 4.n,.e c es e
g s. e e. e.
e,
- w u.
- t. A o. a F 0, a
a a
e4 e.#~ a.
e s.
ry p.
l
.n.a e.
e4 a c e e.
+4
~
> es n r a vs m
w (3 t -
t C Ui
[
p
'e-t-*
4 t_1 s.
L
.J. e..s. a m e.. a. t r4 e. #
- o. e 4 p o. e 4 o, e.
. ss e on4 a ee4 44 m en p.
M en, g.
a.
O a ce ei.
a to. O c.. ei u ir. o ae
.[ e a o w.4 v.
e.4 e m re e w w ei a h,-
a
+ 4 o # e o en e ##
e g,4 I
e.g eae e4 e4 c4 e4 64 O m-b
@ 4#
L m a., e.' sh. as. t e. c. m e. +4.sh e#.= 4
- m. s e. r.a om.
k e ee-L 4s a.
U e-en e n 4 in b w e en vi en.= 0,.
e.a w e e, b ie,-
- n. O e4 e.e e4.n em r ce e4 c te ki 4, c. en se..en e. in eri e 4 bw er +1 ee #4 ce ce t e e a p.t 4
pg e
e o e e4 e 4 e en e r
U
.e L
UN p&
x
- e. 4 ao. m.
r e. -s. e4 + v.
m, m. n. +. u n.
w 5
- ~
e b m at A w@
+#%. t.
e e e, C en ci se e. e. ges w s= p O e4 m t7 e = = Q. s 44 ()
3_
M f 4 e4 e4
+ t' W a-
+ &n r'4 P-t-
e' 8 F P e en o 7
e4 M eM **
e4 es en
@Z L
v.e. oe.+. e *' sa p v.
v v
w> i., v v
b en + n en a a an..
r 0.8 L
.s, e.c. m,e.4. e,n e, a, e
in c n y, e-4 vi e a-u,. e.
4
- ' QI p-e e <*. e. n. e. s s, n a..
g e
w e s e
e e e.
e n e.e, e-n s t.
e,e e- + - e e
0 c9 a p o.g
- o. e o ei p c c O e & a o. er e e p p.
& oe o vi w p a e-o Q
(.'4 a*
ee ew e4 et M
- "**+9
- ** *-e e.4 ei e4 e4 e4 eg eg 4 m e e*4 e e4 e4 e4 m et e4 e4 e5 e4 c4 CO vo o L LJ so W %-O A.
- ) 3 I
$9 HW a c
+,4..
o,.
w., e.
ee-p
,4.n..n
- c. e m w e
- e m e< m e4 oce
.s 4 en o m eu y $
ap C' @
C. 4. EP.
O. en. d.
se. u.> v 4, o
m L e=
c 1
-s se wi O en e e; ev ce n op w e4 o.4 es o.e o-# c.
4 QJ su
- e4 re e
a e en
+
e,
+J g*
e9
-* a **
'o.O u
'E r-u e e. v. o
- c. a.<o. n, ra. r s e o.
o oo U #0
+ eso c e. w.e.
e, o, ar. es n O+b n w t, w a t e, es e>
Q# L 4'
m et ea < <
e4 e a n vi in e. e-4ea en e-t s en 4J g3 e4 8"
e=e f4 F'i is CA
[
OO
~
e v
W "U I
o 6e C 6
- o. e. **.
- s. # 4 en 4
ce, e 4 g
6 4
=
g-C C
@ Pe b gi O. t%
t-c4 g,)
g.>
e f4#= e.4 4 e4 F w e, e.
f,o en e-s-
w m e< e<
r-a en us O P-5 e
e4 e e m
A o
C I'
fu O l
- o. en...
- o. es.,
e,,, e,
u,o o
-p, u
o
-t.s @
sn4 e4 e4 e4 sa, 6 w o to e o ar, en en in e.a
- v. M r, e a c4 si e en O e-t-y N h
M N e4 M
L W
%v G3 OO
- o. 6. m. @
- o. &. w. w en. o. p O
.w w
w C Q) y 4 e en #
oea e r e c'e + e w w ai e o e s<.
e e,
en a og y
e* m e4 et o p3 n a
.n e - +
m e. e.
n e4 e.e
.-g m
g g
- t*(
[F,
- O
't 3 1J V
e.e f a en '.3 e, tg e%.4 s 4 d,e en_ V.4, V
N L.
e-e e 4 m.d, e,d **1
.t 4.
e4 e4 e-o's 89
+4 t 4
c m
n em b e r.
e
- p. s s
p, o, e o p
- t. ne s e e..
e N e-
- Ch
.r*
e e.e p. e p.
- a. o. J a.
o-o e q> o.
sk 0; e es e os e
.e4 e4 H
[ L e
et a r*
==4 eg es e et m N e4 es ** ce e4 H
- e1 ** m O3 t.) U (1 t s'
s'"*
p s-e e
aw s e.
b v
3 s.
t#
e N
4 o
4 we we
=
=es.
u e
e s;
u g
g 64 e C e%
0 4 e4 TW e.4 v1 O &
& ss on e b
6.
m es O
@ Gidt%
e% M 4
$**,s a.1 Md h
,J"1 w
ae A
eh >, p
>. e.e e%
ss w Ed O e'-
q 4
9 a U e k si f g af 3.
- b b 2'
p 6
'A ww s':n L*
i.? O **
bh
- C
- C f * **
41 y
.e e.--
i
.m<i,q sy w--
n.-
y
Attachment to WLS9000298 Page 16 of 33 HAZLCTON ENVinONMENTAL DCIENCEG n u, em a s - - j M
1
-9**
4 4 4 4
}
-, e. e.
- e. e,
- e. e, f ae. e, m. o's b
+
w
- a e
., e.e.., uo. * %
~.
e
... o. r. e. e. u I
t.
v.
- 9. A 4 sn 4. 9,.
. e #e e.de.%y*<
Dmt C e f% t s c' e'% **- t' r% Q (% OVVO O r C' r t
e o
4
..OM s*
a fi 6-
-s
-4 94 ee ve e-
+4 ee t
C' i
e e se,
e*
- t e e
(=
vm M 4 v4 ;
.g 9
i
.e V n t,a 4
- e na retane m s=%
e r C. O r. m e e. O. C. # +
r.^'*
tr 5
....s O.
O. &.
c rs s-
- 1 e
.t 6
>i f*-
en es -
e so.
. A. #7 e
er. e, t 9 r,
.e e*, e.e*.4 es, m D a ch e O O in,.,...
mer c-r C Dr
[
,4.(
- e.%.
=t - r,.
4
.4 +* * *
- 1
-4 fr.
y M -..
e
& ** n 4 [
e% e,ta ta
- # e y a e
t..
em a's ft.
Cm tj e. e. e.
++i e. +.e C. p ( vi.
e
. p. p._
w p,
. ff' f >,,
9 f? s's. a(+"'-
.D.
O O O c' C
- ;"> 0 0
.4 O O f D f'.
n 3'
+.
g.
4 A
E' m t 4
. *.e e. sr w www j
I 9
b 6
eo 4
,9
.4 e' +aM p, t.. & Ne# 1 *C w
j e.e 2
O, O. q%. D. (.*
. e a. J.
. O. O. r. C, t'.
s.
2,
. #.... t. e. m to.
9 f
ee++
g r
g-' D C C C r ' C' f e'. T C C C t'
4 0
W -4 e 4 mm g*
- (
.4 M e *.' de C '*'
r'.'. D t'
- es.
4 l
j.,
w
- *e
~* t a s4 en to e y
a4 4 w e,
~
q o r e4 e * '
w.. m *:,..
e.
e.
, w r, e
- y a -
- o. o e. r-O.
C. es $.e 3 7 e. o. e. t'. c. c. ". I
. as O. dv.
e emen t
b,
-y e4 w
- e. e r o c c e,.
o(
e c -
ecceeooeOceece w
cmeem,, r.d ee.
e.e.a er %
d e e a r. i.s i
w e-
-=
1 e4 4, et ee f f
a en en
..s M
.t t%
e v.
,.s m C-
. e s, e.
C. t.
O. O.
C.
et. e. e %.
D. D. C. C.
^ C 0 #4 em 3-
=*
w.-*.e f6 er
- f **+ 0 0 C OOOC C
== C C c' O C C' C f*.
9 h tr* -8 P-et h W5 y
.a
-8. + 4.e w e+
e
==.
oJ ge wy
.e es me e
p-y en 4 h er P.9 en e 9.
1 4'
9 en 4 e. er, to e et &.g e, 4 h.ir
- e. e<,.-s,s @
- e. e.#, S.
6
. s **. 4.%
g A
e-e.. e, e
h p.
e e
e-t% es 9
- w 4.
-e,
- e. e.
p.
e+
ts P.
h ** e s.e+
e e**P th f* f* & PP P
(*
f*
e Oe. O fm.
q'.P.
.P.4 eep P.4 t.'*.-,9 F
(*- @ fr
.*.1'P 4
m'e.& P e.t e@
- f e'
g
. w e w w
.4
.g
. e e, pg me ed 4
e me 4 g oe
.4
.4
.4 w p-s> m e.*
- e. f,g O co.
.a.
6 em g e,
. c.
J.
.e.
gs a
y M
DOO
(*
O.*
COO C
& 4 P'
u u e.*-
c'e t 4 U w
s e
- d e
a q $
~
04 e es te' n te
(*
O.
- t,s er n. O.
. ne'. t a.
- d. b.= e. C.
s,,.
6 9
w 6, 4p.h
- v. v..f.
e te 4 es OOO O O.*
OOC l
P i o to I
e to P-w e *n er C 4 f 8 en e art O **
4, O.
O. O. w. O.
r a. e. m @
- t. O. e4 re 3c D7 t/ v b 4
en 0 CDOO C D ** *8 O D D f' 4'e s
t's &
it t
7 i
em a e
+4 w e n **
4 ww l
f-I.
w t
ee e,
e.
es 1 **
+ sp o e.4 s.
6 t
O. ed e.i e..
. C.' C'.
e s. a 4 #.
- 0. C..-*
t.
m e4 l
(
f.
t
& 4 e4 es v% 4.
6 m.*
OOQ cCO OOC t
4<
w w
ee e4 *w e. er e e b
k sme - ed e.
q F
'C C ee c
- e9 e.
O ta o a
ar eri h mee*-
e e n.
- o. O. O.
as eat e ea e.s -
O.
eri.
ev. # *.
O O
(">
c r **
O (* O
]
s.
.D, a-y ce.e m e. o tm v s ** e n b
e n es
- 6. r%4 t.'*4 er= t>
q.
m e-r ee e m e
O. (9
.. O.
4-r ee r%.s e=-
y b
n(, t., g.
<i<% e e.
t-e e e c4 t o i
g I er. e g
3
- t 4
s* e. e
, 'i
.e.4 4
4 e
t
+4 e
.s es ee q
C i
l 4*
4' e4 e e 89..e e..a.,
e.,
es.. n'4
.,9 I
es +
c es ee en
+4
,a,
.i.
ee,3,
e e...c., e.
s g
e s ~
e.
i-
,, es s s e.
a.,.o.e. n.4 e4 o- <
.p c*e oe.
e te.
4
- p. p-em e. e c*
p
+
=.d p <* e
<> f* n <*
a e.,
.4 w=
. s s a ** **
ew
.4
-4 ee w ee -e we I
ris f
kr h
>l g
n 4
- g.$.' f --
48 4 -
58 g
e;,
f
- O -
ie w'
.ie J-g, i
e 9
t, q
la
==4 eg 4 4 6,
wpO p'.m da f.
e*
- e., ed D,
'I Dw Cw a ed w w cy w et y at Le GL e
Uw mw or -
y'**v w
t-W t.
y K'
p.
f
=
Q (A ev l
$l.
H I'9 l 4?
w.
wn-
- = :- _-
Attachment to NLS9000298 HAZLETON UNVIRONMENTAL UCIENCES Page 17 of 33 Q)
L
..a et tu w
+ 0. e.
e, 4
gq e
o
.J. e..a.
e e en.
- o. s.i e. c e. c. v e e.
43 I d
t, 4m9-.*
.tiOOH M en O. O O O (i O r. m ** t < m - ei e4,
- a. 4 Of 9
4 su e4 en P' O&
o e e e4 e4 v. v. n o, en y
a v
a un.
e.
t y
g e4 es.i -s au. e g u ir, <.
(U
- 3. r. en. ' +. en. o.
. e. O. +. en. o.
. ss. en
- n. e e m
)
e4 e*
e-k.
L O,OOOo o c.O +4 es e 4 m en m 4 o
oe
. e4 ot>
> t e o - en en '*4 Ua v
3 h N @ ut *- et-5 c 4 +4
> a, m o r.
.O e
me e
e4 m
s
,,C.
c-4 to a sa 42 I' 4 9
to U
< r-ao.o.
en in we en vi c e.
en..n
.#e m m.n p
t e s ei y
.o
.-e e e
.4 is as4-e-a g
p,
~A o o o o
.o, c e p-e.n as 4
o es o
ee r*.
e, en av o - v4 Qi O O c 4-S' 4
a 4
eon ~g y
g e,
et ce r..e m g
(*
re
{
ro e-t,g-s'
.n o a g
A 6h
- s. e*
. d. 4. O. C. - #.
C.
+8. s,' o, (
- a.
M
. g en e.*
C) ee t
t o
a
.c
.e z -
o a o e o o g m c4 re en - em o n e 4 a o a. o c3 ome l
Oi g
a v4 **e*
H e O C O, *A, C.g.
O w
O e4 so t
P**
fU
.C e4 4 vi a ca S'
C ~
.n w e
=t3 s
- 4. in en 412 en. se
- e. 4. t e. - t.
en. a. 4
. ee t.
e N
Q) 4 i e4 es c
+4 0 o 54 es l'-
4>
r e e, ce rei r a,,..h.ac d.e vs en
. & so u. sc 0 O o o c o.n P
h t, b & C D en e e4 e 4 es Os to sh *s e, tw c 3 ei ci
.4 g
y
.f.
DL P4
- P"
/
M e4 PE se V
,C g
- e. n.
en e. o. c.-
e.
e.
- o. t.
en.
CO
- + J en M 4
(*i O C ***
re 4 f4 s ee H @ a eg
.s as N 9 C.,
.o p?
(Q gf'l 9
6o en @ p t4 c.
es
.4 3
} -s f 4
% r$ C LO (U
e o
m m
v d h at p V
e
&,a in. e s.
p4 en @ N ta 4 m @ h to p 4. e.e 4 t-E.
p -s nel @ h e-a.e, 6. e. e. e,c b
e- #.
e,
- s. e - e p+
g e e. e, e-r* e -
e,.
emt c, s - 6 t.
es 9 6 es re op O. p o e o.> o o,a (0
3 p
- p. O o o a o.e.>< o> p os
.t & o' e. p. Oe' & p' e s f e
e ee e4 e em e4 eg e4 c e e.e
- ee e c4 m e4 + e e4 H e4 e ee e-o c4 e4 r
r~
- U
(* 1 W
N Y-tm
.O s Cn' v.
+ c., c4 6
e.
o.
L'?
- s. 4 O, e
,e c. e,. 4 2
e, c i o. b..
. i i m t-N r,
e em m n c.
.O.
e-O an t-vy
+**J 3
(J F")
tu O.
- 4. v4 8 es.
y e.
g g
q y
s uo o ci D r-4 to en ei +
W + to O
C b
"i a
==
O0O e4 e r,
t i
_J (O
06 OO sn v. r 4 e
ee p
s :
es e<
y
-y e--
b w4, en
.e es.
. =
- e, n o e.4 th 7-lm e--
- ~)
4 Ve rw r a a-ooo%
e s e e w in e e no y
,4 r4 eooo c
. c5 i
m r~
G8
'~)
C bc: a c4 m C
r-J, -
s r
-Os a
a c ru aire +
e g
a e-e-V b-V G
J es c.
t e--
6 en 6e 4
t. in s.
t i a. w.
t.
9*
tU 4U.
O h
CV M
(,
L r_
w & er, o r' O r e es e1 4 o re
-.= e 3
.o 3 to Oao
- e< m g;
e 4
r=
U QI
- e-O
{
?
O C0 C
e*
i s. v.,.a 7
c.
r~
(0 g-g a m
p.
s+e.
L G8 42 W
+
.- *a
.u i. v4
(. sse es#re vo.,
o esse v
oo&
<*4' ei o
y to
.n Os C
M M O C4 r'"
p.
C, O. <+s c.
t ru QA C
4
.s
~
O,-- C e-A
.n
<n 0 -s t-o a em e-nop en E~h b E
.~
4 in o en, w
($ *$ c5,4 e r Oi.c ro 'o"' bo n'i fd ed ed.
M D
o o o6 C e s ci a.
one l/
a.n c
ca re s i
- L 4 re C tw e-e ed UC O 3
" 7,'
- Qi O 01 e H U e-H C
au E.e+ e--
QA M ru e, e 4 e's -s 4J qi p
. L
,o.3 ce e t M 4,
'e-v v
.4 e4 m rw v*u 4A k
.* r4 f*n 4 s e - o.ms e,
e c' "o "0-W
'O 4.~ m i~ V al O s es e-e e s as n a
g s n,- e.
o~ + a e ae s a-o. v.4 e e a.,s a e4 eg e4 e es e4 e4 eq
,4 s* c em e4 cm e4 ed b UM 4'O U fU O) M
'8" s
o o, as o O
e
- e4 em e=a to O tw e-Q8 C O L U
.J Os m c-r~ =** V Q m
r~ 43 Ca U E v
taa E 3 3 3 L.
Oh C
a' 41 O oO.cr o
e e--
L fu 48 e-Os 4
to &
L Q2 Qi V 14 L
C
~
CD D GJ V r~ v N
as g, [
j [1 7
ru (O r~
G-
.D O e
o m tm m o a rn L oo eu-o c,-
- G Ce<
H e nn 01 G {} O C 3 G t -
s-
. e-es. e'.ce si a e -
W u
%a-6**-*.
4 g.O & to V Z D t +-
s e p%
'4 %
v n
e4
.4 w
u u-
- O O x 6. e4 C
> 4 f.
7 4
b
(,-
fy fa si,' U V Q) O Di
- U 4
w f.
4 4
+b /.
e F-f.
We th w ss a y v su O 'u v bLy-43
e Attachment to NLS9000298 HAZLflTON ENVIRONMENT /4L GClENCEO lable 3.1.
flumber of algal taxa arid percerit of total taxa by division in periphyton samples collecteil f roin artificial substrates in tfie tiissouri River near Cooper fluclear Station.197?-79.
l Ofc^illjlla;r^j,olp}iy[t a" ThT,o~r[o' }iy t a[Cya riipliyltla[
llo., yt No.
Total flo., of Saniples Year
,t{o.,,,
,2 i
1972 165 91.2 6
3.3 10 6.6 181 21 1973 (13 84.7 9
9.2 0
6.1 48 25 1974 133 85.3 16 10.3 7
4.5 166 22 1975 70 86.4 8
9.9 3
3./
81 12 1976 87 8?.9 13 12.4 5
4.8 106 16 a
1977 74 83.1 10 11.2 4
4.5 89 pg 1 9 / 11 51 78.S 11 16.9 3
4.6 65 21 h
1979 140 02.8 1/
10.1 10 S.9 lb9 26 0 One rhodoph/te included in total.
I' One chrysophyte and one cryptophyte included in total.
53
~
s-Attachment to NLS9000298 I'8 E C I9 Of 33 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL f8CIENCES i
I lable 4.1.
Sunanary of nacroinvertebrate occurrente in benthit (D) anti i
aufwuchs (A)a sampics front the !tissouri itiver near Cooper Nuclear Statione 1973 79.
I
-- - _ 1973 1974 197 r ~ 1c m - 1977-1970 Ictr
--I8'"."
.. 1 I. [ T{A],j]{f l { { fl Q,[$f {_[ B'A']
Wematode 4
4 4
4 Unidentified hematoda Aphalmidia (noplida (Mrylamidae 4
Wyglolatmossp.(obb (ntdaris ~ ~
Hydterna
'I Hy dr oide s (lavidae 4
4 4
4 4 4 a
Lordf ophora latultril l
"Allman Hydridae
- 4 4
- 4
+- 4 4 e Hydra sp. Llhnneut.
Pla tynilmt nt hes lut tiellari a itt(ledtda f
Planartidae e
Unidentified Planatildar 4
Ougenia sp. Girard p hab A6t'oela e
Unidentified 8that dncoela kemettina
( popl e Hopjenemertini Prottomatidae 4
Prestoma rubrum (telt'y)
B ry ol oi~~~' ~
i Unidentified l'ryoroa
(<toprocta l'hylato'acmata f rederitellidae 4.
4 4
+-
4 Fredricella sultana (Bumenbat.h)
PuEilellidet 4
l.lyallnella, punctata (Hanced )
_ _ l etoprod a Unidentified intepretta' Urnatelltdae e
4 4
4 e 4 Urnatella ratilts leidy t
Anne 11df~~
p~~~ ~~
Oltgochaeta Ple$1 opera Acciosomatidae 4
4 Aeolotoma sp. thrneberg 4
K N an ncorense Alyer t n3ylinidaF 4 4
'4 e
+
4 4
+
4
+
e Unidentified I nchytraeldae Haldidae' 4
e 4
Aultt orut furtatut (fiuller l h
4 Dr'at.tll'ava Unideiitata e
+
4 f hseW6aiteF~dlithitsis (Gruithutsen) '
4
- . +
4 4
- 4 4
+ +
+ e 4
DetB~olgitita' fHullfil 4
4-e
-e 4
e=
D.~itorialli Terronnt ere l.iti T6.*(Hu11er )
- 4.. 4-
-4
.L 4
44 4 -
4 e
NJ1.ordata Huller 4'
4 4
4
.t 4
e 4 4 k.IFehninitlitchaelsen a
4 e
e,
4 e
e H. hvetic her t litc haciten 4
4 4
4-4
'4 W. tonemsnit Ilfuset 4
4 II. ellng5li Muller e
kl iliRy'lsi Piquet IU iirlaFI1I t 4
6 4
4
. DphidtAali'Tirpentina (fiuller)
T 72
...a-.--.-..a..
e 4
Attachrnent to 1C 9000298 HAZLETON ENVil10NMENTAL GECIENCEG Pat',e 20 of 33 lable 4.1.
(continued) f
= _. _... _ _ _ _. _... _.. _. _. _.._. -
.g.
g
. g._.. g y. g.g 9, g,,
- gg-fA
~b T ' T C ' ~ P '~ A ' ' IE A ~ ' lil 1 " ' -
Par ana t t f r it t Hrat>e
. +
4 4
e e l
e e
f H ttiria Isreli (Piquell f.' a c qul S e t a 'th'eu r ne e
4 e
P; (drentis~5pertcr e
e 4
M 16r.sisets t hrentierg i
+
e e
e l
N '71ei dy l' smi tt.
e e e e
F. pstioint Waltun e
P.~ s i nia e
+
Ma' vine apuendi(ulata d'Udd em e
e e.
ttelatta Tecostils-(tinnaeus) tuleNflidae i
Auludrilus limnot,1ut tirt tttlier 4
e e
4 4
4 e
e e
A[higuet$,hoWaIt*w$kt 4
e
+
4 e
e e
brant tilurd towert.y t tieddat d i
lif t drilui ter@)itant (Southte n)
- +
e *
- e
+
I
[16n6ar t 10 $le rv i s"ilr t ed tiut s t l
I. 41 gat edlanut Itatici
- e e e i
e 4
e e
s
+
, e
- 1. f of f s.elster l't.f apar ede i
I'. ' spir'el ti'i tsen
+ +
+ e e
4
.. udit esilanut (laparede i
ht/t (t n' ("uti{ f e n (Huller)
~
+
4 e
- Iiwdtuic"w/u~ rap. (haelse lematute n/ t ap. Lt.aetae e
- e e e 4 e
h phopora tir a nt ti t ctalelli dae e
( and>a #.1.nt o.l e m. a_t.r o. dn.nt a i 1115
-c R hy n< tiotide l 16 da Lion s t ptioni t da t Unidentifled Glonntptiontidae Pitili'olidas ~ gate (Castic) lle10bdella elor -
tiytobdella mooret (Meyer) e Pharisfutidtllidi ~
(
Irpobdellidae Unidenttiled (rpolidellidae t
t e
4 (lina (lluorcubdellet migrektuma tipure l r);otnicila~iHingsla t a^ fiovi e "
A r t tir ppoda l
(rvitacea I
150pudd Abelltdae 4
e e
4 Atellus sp. Hillaire AI it(EI'medlub furbet e
Arthh tiloda ~ ~ '
I j
lai t te ittae 4
+
e e
+
Hyaltita artn a (Saussure) l
(
Gammaridat
(# 4tgot y a sp. Bete 4
Cansolus sp. Idbritius IIVCag[hda Attacidae linidentif led Attat tdae
+
At.u tinida ' ' '
sp. l. ope 4
4 tir t unn in Arar$na 4
4 8
duident i t t ell H)dt'a(af inJ I n 4tT t a inytanura d epy 91 da t-Japya 50 t ellendivla 73
Attachment to NLS9000298 "I
3 HA7LIITON ENVinONMtINTAL 13CitINCi?D
\\
Table 4.1.
(continued)
._.g
'B'A "T A ~ ' D A"
'll T F T" "h~'A~
"D A" _ ^
_, l a,qn, 1
ltntoN der 4
16ntonia sp. hour let ltotonorut p ~alv6 trit Olutter)
~~~~
IchemNortita Unice ntified (themeroptera lphemeridge (theren 50.
4 4
t.'altmm (say) 4 Heeajenta sp. unith e e e e i
e e
e j
H. Timbata nerville) e fenta9enia sp. Walth 4
j I M ittip ~ era teinhfae e
4 4
e e
Brachytertut sp. tuttit 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4
+ e 4
e f afElt W.' $lephent 4
e e e e
e 4
4
+
4 Triforgtbodet sp. Ulmer Hep'tToe ni Telae "
4 e
e 4
4 e
+
Mnidentif teff Heptagenildae e
Aneptorut Sp. IkDunnough e
i e
4 tieptayinia sp. Walth li.' diahKla Durt t e
4
+
4
+
4 4
I C elegantula laton e
4 e
e,
e 5tehsems th 1 ravel 4
U~ i r~e t' liur k n
- e e e 57 integrum (HeDunnnue) 4 1
$! In{erisnctatum (54/)
e e
L te ijiunttdum (pant t e
Dattidae
Unidentif ied Baetidae e e Ameletut sp. laton e
e e e e
+ 4 e e haetit ip. Leath e
4 4
4 17 $ibia sp. laton ho e
autef Iraver
+
G l* alert traver Ddonata Grunph t da e 4 e Unidentifiett Gomphidae a e e
e 4
e e
e e
(.nmpbut Sp. teeth llhellulidae Didymnpv sp. Pemburt 4
liiuliwordulta twltsta (Walth) 4
!is toc h1oi'aiiGTelyn (Rria gr (KnTrke 4
e Unidentified toenegrior.idae e
+
4 4
e e
Areta sp. Elamhurs 4
Inillarima p;raeverum (Hagen) i 1Whriu'a perMva Seiyt fl et opler a HennuridAc e
l aeni r.p t e e _ sp. pittet terlodlitae,vu e
hcoperta sp.
+
-e e
I nperta sp.
terlids 4
terietta sp. Han6s-4 e
e e
4 e e Vi"placida (Hagen)
Pterchartidae e
e tteennarryt sp. Newnin e
E.'pl(tEtti Hagen McM p t er a " '
lortsidae 4
4 4
e Unt&ntified f et t s triae IIe ifid e 4
e Unidentified pleidae 74
t 3
+
Attachment to NLS9000298 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL BCIENCEB Page 9 of 33 lable 4.1.
(continued)
Tamun
~ f ' A' '
~h'A
'B'~A~
B")
h~A' 6'~A~
~ h~~A Megaloptera
+
Unidentified Megaloptera Cory da li dae
+
Corydalus Latreille 1riihohlera P hy ac ophida e 4
WhyaLUp~hile go, pictet Polyisitroiddidae
+
+
+
tinidentified Polycent ropodidae fyrnellus sp. BanL A t
4 e
e
+
(. f raternus (benk < '
kiu'riillisTi sp. P we
+
+
, +
4
. +
+,
HTdropsichTdie t ot 4 ed Hydrc,
.dae
+
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ e
+
+
+
+
+
+
Chguatopsyche sp. Wallengen
+ +
+ +
+
e hyd_ropsythe sp. Pittet
- h. taettenT Ross
- h. Cuanis~Ross
+
+
+
(U Iflidl Ross
- +
+ +
+ +
+ +
4 e
+ +
+
+ +
+,
, +
+
h.~ oUr'ti koss
+
+
+
+
+
IC iiiQ ans Ross
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
4 e
+ +
+ +
fotamyTiflava (Hagen)
Hylriptl11'ie' d
+
e +
+
+
+
Unidentified Hydroptilidae e +
+ +
+,
Agraylea sp. Curtis A. mulIipunctata Curtis
+ +
+
Iiyo@illasp.
e +
+ e e
e llayatr,iihla sp. Musely M. ay'ama Mostly
+
+
+ +
e
+
+
e M utria ta sp. Morton OGjt(tj a sp. laton
+
+
Leptocerfilae Ceraclea sp. Stevens
+
C,.tarsTJpunc tatus (Vorhies)
+
C. transversus (Hagen)
+
+
+.
Gptocella sp. Banks
+
+ +
+
+
G iiindTTG ttagen
- l. oiarina Russ
+
i i
+.
Nsctujs[cjhe can_did_a Oecetts sp. fklachlan D cinerascens Otagen)
+
COTeoptere Dytisctdae
+
+
Unidentified Dytiscidae Dytiscus sp. Linnaeus
+
larcop. hilus sp. Leath
+
Hydrophilidae Untdentii ned Hydrophil 1dae 14erosus sp. teach hy d rut hu <. sp. Ledch e
St aphyl i ni da e Unidentified Staphyinidae
+
HelodidJe Unidentified Helodidae
+
[lmidae s
+
Unidentified Elmidae
+ i
+
. Duutropht_a sp. Sanderson e
+
e 5'encimis sp. Dufeur He'tirse'rl dae Heterocerus sp.
Lipidoptera Unidentified Lepidoptero
+
75
Attachment to NLS9000298 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Page 23 of 33 Table 4.1.
(continued)
._ _.-- ~_._____-
g.. --.
.g. _ __.
_ _lalon_
~(IA ~' T A ]_JiA'i 1 3 ] Q ihiAli )
'A~'
Diptera Unidentified Diptera Psychodidae 4
l'ericoma sp. Walker
$1EiillTiae Unidentified Simultidae
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+
Simulium sp.
0hidi66inidae
+
+ e
+
Ablabesmyia sp. Johannsen
- r. Ealleciil (walley)
A'! mo611Ti~(Linnaeus) e i
+ +
+
+ +
+
+,
Chirnnomus sp. (Helgen)
+
Cli36Usybrsus sp. ticf fer LITE 51siguT~ Tis) pinguis (toew)
[651Egin yus sp."Elif f eF' l
+ e
+
+
+
+
+
+
CriTotopus sp. (Wulp) 4 CT 5Tilnctus G TiiT TuRus gr.
C Frimmuliis greur (tinnaeus)
. +
+
G Ulisnulstus Hacq.
+
C isTT Tr W R ia C viiiriensis '
4 C TTideladfiiil smestris F TTiscladiusi ip. -
+
CjF ptochironomus sp. (Kleffer)
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
4
+
L. blarina (Townes) 4
+ +
C jdT TIHus Malloch C f ulTus~J6hannsen
+
+
8'n'dfFosus ($ublette)
+
C [ Qin_dl @lEhp_Uemicypochironomussp.
+
+ +
s len2 near near FmonstrTuTTChEyskit)
+
+ +
near U~ i'5111 (Kirpitshenk o)
+
near E! T5E31otzkli (Goetghebuer)
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
Dicrolindipes sp. kief fer
- 0. modestuslay
+
e
+
f 5dicTiio~nimus sp. K f: f fer TUltTFTrerielli sp. thienemann 4
+
C1 e
+
U.7ptoteniijiis sp. Kie:f er (ssTIF. Tif f er
+ +-
+
+
+
E.~ TThy~Fi'a sp.
totendipes) ss. Goetghebeuer
+
+
IIir_ni sc Itieffer)
+ +
+ +
+
+
+
h,ydrsbaenus sp. Brundin laiGUh3iETa pliosella (toew)
+
~
+
+ +
+
+
+ +
+ +
+
EiFiTa sprittkau
- l. decolorata (Halloch)
+
liTc7EhTr6iiohus sp. Ktef fer
+ +
+
+ +
+ e
+ +
+ +
+
e e IWcropsectra sp. Kieffer
+
+
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
+.
liin5HTdiui'sp. Kief f er
+
+
C iErlfrient $ aether
+ +
+
+
+
Uths!Tidiui (ss) sp. (Wulp)
TarichTronomus sp. Lenz
+
F. abortivus (Halloch)
+
+
P~i pettinalillae (Dendy & Sublette)
+
+
e Firacla35p_iTOp. Harnisch
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
Faralauterb576tella sp. Lent
+
+
P'aTWTETier IF11riF. (Thienemann)
+
p a}r~a'pha c hocl'a'diu s T h i enema nn 4
+ +
I*aratanytarsus sp. Kieffer
+
+
V5ratendipes near connectens Lipina 76
o Attachment to NLS9000298 HAZLETON ENVIRONM4NTAL SCIENCES Page 24 of 33 i
l Table 4.1.
(continued) 17F 1H4 157!i-~
1976 7 W7 THff-~TWi~
.18 $ua.
_ _ _ _ _ -... __lTA~ 233CT1dCA1.Ifl AllISEA132 A T Polypedilum (55) sp.
F-~hi1*c'6nilitum* gr. (Walker)
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
F! (ii) 'I11Tonense* type
+
+
P.~ (iil I nt W lHelgen)
P! lii) 'scilienum gr. (Schrant) a
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
PT lis) 'iEu1Tnigr. Townes
+
+ +
+
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
fiocliiiles sp. 5Gse
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
+
F 7(P T 5illus (toew)
Psectrocla0Iui sp. IKief f er)
+
+
EscuducMronomus Malloch
+
+
Iseudosmi~ti'la sp.
+
I W iseudosmittia Goetghebur Pheodiistopus sp. (lhienema6n
+
+
+
+
Tilarnischl Phectanytarsus sp. Bause
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
R6EicTifiliager (Townes)
+
IsinTrsp Yoligren
+
Fte665f ronomus sp. Kief fer
+
+
+ +
+
+
+
+
Tanypus sp.
+
+
T.l ssi neopunctipennis sublette
+ +
+
+
T'.' fii) E nci F nnTi Wiigen T." Tiil s tilTa tusToquillet t
+
+
+
la_nytarsus sp. Elp
+
, +
+ +
+ +
4
+
+
+ e ThTenemanntella sp. Kief fer
+
+
+
+
TKienemansiEy'Ti group Fittkau
+
+
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
Trissocleolus sp. (Kief fer)
+
+
liso'cElronomus ( Anceus) sp. Roback
+
+ +
C(AT)* taenI6not'uTT$iy )
+
Gial'oFog6niiiie Unidentified Ceratopogonidae
+
e +
+
+ +
+ e
+ +
+ +
Dolichopodidae Unidentified Dolichopodidae
+
+
+
[mpidtdee Unidentified Empididae
+
4
+
Hemerodromia sp. Meigen
+ +
+
+ +
+
+
+ +
+
f phydridar 4
Neoscatella sp. Halloch
+
+
TipiilTdae Unidentitled itpulidae
+ +
hematoma sp. Latreille
+
fluW idae
Unidentified Ptuscidae
+
+
Unidentified Anthomytidae
+
Hollusca Gastropoda Pulihona t e Phy 51dae P,hysa sp. Draparnaud
+
+ +
+
+
Pelecypoda Heterodonta Sphaertidae
,5 haerium sp. Scopc'll f
+ +
+
+ +
+
Total 40 121 56 127 56 82 68 B7 49 82 55 71 57 90 d'1972-74 from liilsenhoff artificial substrates, 1975-79 from multiplate plate samplers.
77
n
[
Attachment to j
NLS9000298 Page 25 of 33 9.
y ee f
I }L j d'
me
?: i' ? ? ?
Ji R ;i l' ?. T_ T 2 - --
- ??
17 A
og tp, r -
i
- r.,
4 1-52 3e bW s.
4 p-(g
- a..
S-j
,l s,
[
- i
\\
to t
'ItP hv 5
C 4
n*
- i n 4 o -.
y J, 1
s :
e.* ! o -
g+ee N
e
~
v.
s
'ea g
(
- 9-
- 4 C
}
5s C
F-i 8
w) ce c: : : re: -: : : ::
= -,
.-.,.?
- I
- !a. :
Q
,{3 T,
- u =
en r e : : :
+.
s v
v v
y e
W I2 N
W
. C..
t-k b
~* - w
,-e--
- n., *,...,.
,g.:
y*y 2 : : : -
- : :- *a: -~ : : : :: : : C: 2 y
w
- 1. T y
y Vae v
V V
.C
& C
]
+
i C
In b
e C
h w
a9+-
?4 ? r 7 8 9"t -e*
W ( P $== - ap :
Y- ;e y
?
. * = = e*
p I
e 1 - is ae te e :e
. +
3 o'
W E
.E C
N 1
3.,
a i
h c
?)
^:- I
.t 55 3j I
t c
'J'
}
.2
(
a
_ JI h
,I E
L' v
s
-*se
- s 1
2
,e e
- t s ~
j jy
.F,.b ::k Z +
b
. ' N ( 1 l 5 3 ;- I e,i' t
7 s,1. ~( T [ *5 I,1 -
6-4 h
. i)yO G-i i c :( $ [(*32 I
t es w y 1
}Er x
b5EEEY$?$l$l E0{E?!'E.hElii?
bs
.e tsysttc' 1a 3
2 ; s s u:
- 2. sC.I J.r c E :j,,; 1 ! c :; t t = },v g 3 = f,q
.o j ;,c 4
e n e G
6<'}
H
.r
>< s...>r a u y e:*m m r e a r m
,a
'bs i-rt y, 4 g
r s
't e
IeIk s
!s l,
g
, 4,pw we -
wee enet, -
w.
w
=W
d g
4 5-
~
8 l
l
Attachment to g
NLS9000298 Page 26 of 33
,.d.
ET'?! i Y
-:c( ":[:G?E a 4 4 1 1 E 'E -t' E
r i s t % v i t r.
t >
- r. er 6 yTya V E S t5 *[t 9
t_
y
~
r.. k k e
li4 g
g*
9' r r. D 7 c:
f.
y(.L E g Li
= (
t g
k W
(- 4 ir I. M.
4 a.
5*
h
!4 c a z.
? $ ( Y g
a
- . a.
5 jh ri 5?
i '~ ? I i
-e j i s.
?E Y ~3
~q T (
- lT C t d'.
~a %
l7'b T
O W
R.
/
V i
il e
s r'i u r. r :: n_.,5;r:
r' i g
e Y
a es S
9
.~
n E
5 4T
..~.'d.. $.5 "r *-~f.f *
=
A
)
_ '[ ;,.
7
? r y
2.~
C
- W
". T t
~g c_ v =_ : : : :.e :
a:
n
_ eeze 3-
.,f F,~ 7 's a.i n T.i ~r G t
g m
-r g
e.
YO2 s
(*
w
- u...,.,
t 5
g u,a z..,.
.v-s g
+
V C
O g
3 0
6n r.
gw
= ?= -
st
's ui 4
==
=
- ,,=.=._.=
- -
O
- g vv u c g
c 5
g A
4 4,
y T Dn * : : : C 2: C
~, !. 2 5
__a u-i
- 3I V
'C
! ^ -
.r
- :: : E ! *;
,g C
+
- P O.
0
Attachment to NLS9000208 Page 27 of 33 Table 10 Summary of actual fish impinged at CNS from 1978 till 1983 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982
- 1rd3 Glzzard Shad 125 171
- 92 195 473 19 Goldeye 3
3 9
11 4
2 Carp 17 29 12 15 17 2
River Carpsucker 2
5 10 23 24 Smallmouth Buff alo 3
1 12 3
Channel Catfish 5
1 6
1 3
2 Flathead Catfish 1
5 3
5 2
White Bass 2
11 1
5 Freshwater Drum 66 38 89 30 66 Shove! nose Strugeon 1
Paddlefish 1
Shonnose Gar 2
1 2
Longnose Gar 1
Unidentified Minnow 29 2
11 2
Bigmouth Buffalo 1
1 1
2 3
Unidentified Bullhead 1
1 UrMontified Crappla 3
1 Sauger 1
1 1
Unidentified Gar 1
Bluegi!!
1 1
1 1
Unidentified Species 1
Black Bullhead 2
2 Largemouth Bass 2
1 Unicentified Catfish 3
6 3
2 2
Unidentified Sunfish 1
1 White Crappio 6
1 Black Crappie 1
Blue Sucker 1
1 White Perch 1
1 Total 264 270 261 287 618 36
- 1983 contains only 6 months of data
!mpingment data was collected for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 2 times a month
Attachment to NLS9000298 Page 28 of 33 a
-e
, - u -
J.- AT =
N b
su.'
- [
n" _7 b.
- -x M.:-.
,g v,,
es., _ 7,-
- m.. f, - - n r
.,.,.,3r y
A.
e.
.3 e.
v.i '
q -
x
- ..r y
T.. 3 q., f* F
.t a
,a, v
. q
-;. : g
..=, 4 O -- n m: 4 : q
.,. q u.a r t
m.
=.
6
=;,
n n - -
s n 7
.=. f wa r.
q s
w
-e D
-4 w
q-,
- m
.~ w
+
m mI*"'L, W q L as >,. 4
, C 7_
m W 71 L. - - m
+
? ms
~.a Q^
-A t %
". 9
= ;
- L L.
-~q
.K-m' uL.
q e
4
. L e.
V a+*
- d 7,
s g.,
1
-./.;
.,2,,,
- - g P.j, p k 3
- c_,
c 4
- m e *
- . i b,
^ +-., 4 s
.%.=q
- U y e
.,.A'.,
- F -
2,
,r-
-X
, S
..a 7,..,..=,* 7=J,4
,g,,
.s
. =p S y (
- e. _r,u ;- =. j'
,2 S
-O
-2 O
l^ T" D..a. A -
,E -
.=.A. ** O
=
A.
9 n
---n
=
y 4
- q g Z m
_r : -
L.
=
r~,,
7 r j, ;
q T
r-q s
. D
-,. ' T g=9-n' c
- 4,.
L,_ *,,.; 2 *..-T..,.,
-T,I.:. h.
L O
=A 9 b 5-0
- f- -eQ
./ _-
' 7 w,'
~. 3:
-A
+,.. - J.:. _- _ -
- 6 n._.
,e + # -
3 A Jw.
9 - A. A -. gm
..z_L - o-r. - x n, -
.' - L. '
q
. 0 T 3
- g
~
y
. =
m q
.w N-
't-y,
- L 4 A""
=. = -
"1
-f 2
q C
- b. - - -.
c*. = ;,,
s 1
s w
eg 3.
q q
g
.y' U - - _. -,. -
-D" A --
.'"8'O.
, 2
[ $
- U 7
N h
7 7
s..-
t 2' e,
.i.
p e
e L
g vc ** -
= -=, - q q., q -
a :;.
m.,*4-x.
= *' + m 1
.z. q J.
- " q q r-i L
7, g
A J& 3
.t O"-
- C
.Z.
A
. *, q g-7 4
- - K U4 q
= m a
'd 4 f
e
.- q L 9 q
-
- 1.
4,
-O,. O O O
-O.t.,
$ O.,,,,.n P
A q --.,.. 3==. ^
a A"'
y
. - ~~ q j " ^ -
- S v
'+ ).
-i ~_,,,, 3.-- [-.
g
- m m.
y
- g s
e n' A
,d i,,-
5 Ls L - - =-
- ^;.; ; - 0 L
1, O
A
,s 0
a 4 O
~
- e g -
b *'- S... - _
b
- i 1,
.'*) L' : ~ u
,L - h 3
.?
J,. -,
- a 9
q
.1,
+ c.
O., A k
L 3
,c
.w R..
L.
- p,, 9-
,0
-- p 0
,P.
L'.',. ""c... A ~
e-* %A
.f.y +-, 3.
m a
q =
V
- rg e
QL )
"'- * - a 9
a L
L e.
m
- - ^ A q
t w.
- - - - g L 9 D
7',r,-
'** O* ; - j-. -
4,
.d
-,s.' ", 2- -
z - n.n
.r u
w
.n
,L aJ- ~.- - g,.
q-w p -
q - -
a.;.
r +.',
p.,
D t
q"
-d q
5
- L
- /,
r u
.- - m &., -. " 2 - 4, 4
a y
I.,.
~
I.,
~
-a,- I., - ;., - L,
e L-s.-
e.
~-
+9
,a e
w L.
- y
" ".. -- m
^
. v -
.a q.
-v..* g f'
.,. W 9 y,
+
.f.m n -.,. $,
L.,.
!J"
^
Cw
.SN I
l x
n
, - r
.9 g
y i
2-d' -.,. - -, ~.' *** C r~
- ,, * -. w O 3 -
S g **
- ji.
3.- A y ',/
- p - 7.;
,7 L-r.
, " q - L q =-
+
f,] >; n*-,
f.1 - ** I et 7 - g E.,
L -" ;
e y
L* d %
~
-L
-f_-).
+
~
U
.O' _~**
L, Cd.. ** ~ -[37 J,~.
5.,
Z. n~ :k 3, D,
L A :*
C" m
e --
.., - a a
w.
yq x
m n
Cn. -,,
- ~
C., / 'O q
q 3
- e. L r
~'
g q
f.~ w :,.., (( -
k
.[. b3 h b "'"',b J e
. +
. q -.
g - --
+ - q O
g
.,' A-4 b;E" [kkA 32~ C., g, J.
O 7
q s
b
-r
.L.
b Y #* O 2' L7, *" [ ; C~ M,.d *5 Y,.~~
- 9
- t -
q
-
- e m
, n 9 -
,9 h'n 2.h.
L N
"7 d..O.
- T*
g " ' *~* L
. 4 $
-*.r.
4 4
L.
w
- 1
-. - - 3'*
O -- -
1O E 1 7, k m ~~. ; ^a
~e.,O _ -
""*'Z h Q #4 L
. " - A 9 - a+Y d;
C.
.".s m., - : - -
- t-.'I L
7,;.
q
, 9 C
J. _
T ja u;
., 7 n L n - - -
1.,
e
-., f;-. - -. *;..- #
L
- +.
- ~-
tr s.
L,.
,_e.
- n 3 -
a
- -, L.,,
f
_r
.n ;. )
c
...a O /...-
r x
- :- - - m p
x C.,
f.
.+
T".
4-1 w
e 3
J e e q_
e 9 J'4
- O 3 =.s.- - ( q A
g s
s
. q - 2
~. -
q 4
- g.-
L *,
m- ; - -
d= 3 - pr = U *. - - A 9
- e 3,,. m q
- ~
r.
O
.L.
q..
--.-~ J 9
2, qs,.- *-. Z p+
p'#.
. *.' g-2 m **. *. A ~-
1-y.
O
.L,
.. C. - '
y' 3 -
3,'
9 n q
L *- 7 q q-m g
-1. ?
7.
m I ;,u.7 E n.'.
E 7,
) e.i-g gq?
,3*
- ' V' a -
.. e.e L A n 6
- r TA
- 4
- - 7 "" - 3 e
C I
.. O &
-.4 E ss f1-y - ft
,,**}
e x,-
J
+
-s q ;-
e s.,-
a f) r
- I
, -e.'.
e, a -- C
.n.
E-
=
+ *C
,o y *,
~~** I;*
,e 4
ee=-
q *
~ q T'
a m.
m==
9 e,,
S",.
~ = ~ =,
g, m'
- U
-"'"q c.,.
7 - q
,,e
- ,,_?
..*..L.==
,. *"/.
q.
m #
2 e
,,,,,, ".,%,,s.
- 7 V,
.u m
m
/
p
. C
, el g**
7"' - =
e.,
z
,,,, p
. I h q
.-7 o
fa.
i
[
U
- W.
O I C
= :.
,A y * - q * "" "
- w. v - 4 e J~ T, _ ;4 -*
q S,
- y L,
y
,m g
y g rg 3 -
T 7 ",
. =. - 4
~
y*
- x - *
n L
- e..:, ;,,. =.,
.L m
4 2, o
.n.-
. q
- y'
$y 4 e
. Q,w6 4
C * $
,M
- T {.
O Pi O Y sd $ $.4 - [#
5, 4 CIT f
d
- T **
av.
m
-s
-e
- 3*
p [
c w
e.
L; \\ ;, ?
- T CC m
-A C /
- f r ~ T f
- 1 h 5 N" k b
b[bk
[ $ k i,
/ b-C [
[)$ Tk 5
A#
C"'*
p.q hIh
$ 3 I, ~k, !, = 7.Ah5 5,
e.i4 w u.
i,,,a
+ =
- .S "a - - -
-1,
=,
= - =.=- "
,.%+B. =
y
. 9
+
m,r r-
. () S
,w,, L4 w
,./.,
e.,;. u. -3 a; 7 4 4
- G-6-
m4 6
.g
.*w am -*, - - -
C_, ' eys -
w.'-*
-; 4 L e
t.=
D q.s **-
e S O -,
t,,
e r- '". bi 3 -
e'
-I
/
i.i. e at s
c.
% : ~-
.;se ? - c;, 2 +
%M =-
i
- a".
,s,
+
n 5., '."'. I 3
- 4 7.,.' 7 -
.f 4 " i.; O 7%
2_.
W 2
7 ** y; b c
- 3... 6 " D* *O
(
D O
s W
q e
T.. --
4 -
r, n :
m w
p
.i 7) -g.,.,. qeg;O-ft A S-C 3
.-O w
-n n 9 - -
8 a = ' V*
-U D P
- I O
-,a ; w +. i.
.e'
=-,
O k
-- c4 u 4.
S M
C Qm
- 4 ~2 A,-[
.'t*. x ;. g g
2 g 3q p
y ; 7g g,_
f "- c {,
_-x, n
- z r
is - u.
g g;,
- y 9
.y
} yO a*.eq-t.
ts Cs, p R C *** m
. q 3
w'a a
D 7
- I
- j y-
- W.. ' *.. ~, 4 -
a;;' %.
- d 0
.,,s..+4, t&='d i.-
v -
J _= -
-.. 5 Y &
- d E r(
T?hy
,W O)$q k>n.
m,,,,
L L N y
p e
n-n,,,,
L, m
y u... -
.,.u+.e.
v, p -
m
.x w, n.
~ w.
r w
- >. L m.
g
' g
+
y9"/ V'
-aj e q
..e
,",,,.,,,,.4 w.,,
.++
,'t 9_
.C.
q A
w 0 --
W b*-
- O O h O_. ~, L 4
g qwI+T-
=
Q y 4 N, $
0.,
- .=
am 15 $. 7' 4a$$g1 I s ;4
- a A3N u
x
~ S
==
J
- T,
.i,
O q
,,m
-t o' '"* n #
a
.-e f,.,
- w ~ 6 ~. s * 'f
-\\
2 9
L r-
~- e.' r;, q n,, O R.
m 6
O.-
- s
~*N n
Q m
C s7 r
C. 1 C*
2
.PB T
u 3,
g 3
w
=s
+ _.- - 4 s
r y
,n ee.-
n, 7
j =?
yye-mum -r
- n e (_ Q rg
.,J 7.
'O n
..~. ::' '. -' rt 4
w g._
-ve g
s y
-q g
m O
s -
M*n c.=
y g,,
[,,
y
+n{.
f. ie+0.*6w a
D 4,,.
s u w.
6 x
.q
- y e, c -- gyy pg w
,a rg g aa-4 N
U A_
- 1 f.. R -: z e, - w e,.
o" -.., -
. e
., ": $. g q
7
- D E 5,. C Q T*
Y,.
W f'
n O
.. + -
f, w YT E, T " [.
"1 $ s,.
w,,.,*:.
u
- 4 3 2
= ~ e :r
/
+
c u
- c. t a.,
,' '. ft===
m
'l
- U"'"
- ~ g ey-=Kr h,d n
,4
'I w-L C
's.'
g U - s
- , g 7* ?. l. :,1,,' $
e 4.,- !,-,
~3 S
C y ;,,-
<f
%.J L
- q -
=,= u k.,.
n' zi. u
. ' w n55tha i u3n C,a
- a4 -
e-9 :
-e z,- ;; -
j 3
n#
n n --
E
- 4 y
y L
- ~' - - -
4 o
n, D # ;- L G-u, - O k
m y 7
C O
a.
,c'*., " ' _1 ". O- -4
- b-O 6
g ':; - 6 w-
+7 3'.
w u.
NU Y
^#
F 3 -
- -*~ 3 J
- n
.x,; 2
. +
c,,,, n I e u,,
.. * * '9' 83 f 7
E,. C e
- 4
- u+
m - -; C.
- T 'r*'
g77-g ga -
- g,,
I e
v
- .3 -e?<# - - -
g g
{ L s
t e
q g - m n
Q o
O m'
. y 7 2
- l,. m &.-
O I
, - rL, G
,. rs.,.
L - - r,. _,,,
g
- s - I
.m i-
-N
'[
=E
- ^f1 4 -
r n*q et s'*e.
- =
'c'l-,,,
6- -, = * - -
m m, b 4..
- 1 a
q e
q t-n L. y ' ' - *, w
,r u - s.
C g,,
L r
, m
,. =
e - - q
- A
't
=
3 a. 2 u
3-m v
s Q.
s.- -,", -
n,.- te g.-
p.
i ** n c.,
5 5 "- - +>
7 4
v*
- - *" *. ~. " '
r-c,,,,
og 7g_ n'
-, - n./.- -
h- - o n,
i g
" k7 q
. q 3 7 g N h 7* f h
+a4 7
C
[
L U
uC4 h
.e.
m.
)
-,. i.
gl 7 k (~ ~ O S "
e.
g '
- 7 y 3.,-
c,,
- z. e-3 p-g,,
n n
- : - y ej 2-3
- n s., -
r; 9- -
u-2 w1. u. &. :-.;
. n 3 i., L -
e#
17.
e
,. s
,g n,.=. -
{ 3 3 '
- 22;AE" ', r
.s3h E
u s o s - m - P; g y F
- 7 r. ~~ T'* $ z, q w -
g g -.
y,. g '
O,
[
L
-i,..
a-4.
-4 ry n 7
b e
7 O
""" 5
- " % 9 b
OX k
.,.a S
g.y - r.i, E
- k. E t:
E-E* E o
-- s e
c s
7
= : 2
=.
~I 5 ^
.. 2
- --.. 3 7 s s 1.
2
<c c e++- s, s.
-w--.
g
-.e,.e 4 - R x
4
- ' q q r e e.
n ss g;
2
-.,. -.. a 4.L]
, y g
&b
'" N
,,..g
- * - + '
f<'
l I
-f 1jTf!f liI ff'
?
l i
I l
t i
mto=
p a-
- 4 t f d mh e7 r
h u s t ns ni) d eh a oe h
p9 h dW t
s q
- e sdd ed 9 n ek tc tu nt e
iom7 f
a e n h nil nec o
s d
n 1
ng e$.hnS. eh ta a a igb e a e
o n eu r
s ah a h
t t
r 9
i Ne aim i nk nmnw m1 l
t r
a mc mA ig on mkiNnodeC d
c n c
c a
n
.k" e
e e
e al oladl ml:
e ni h d ho<nmM t
s o-x wtut e. er gb ai C
e e hh i
d h
t mAwe t
o h wa Rd b e oipe ah pa pd i r
s nd le n e
t h r p
..tuh lad u u tat b nma h n n
a f
t ie m
e d
t atab s t
n c n on r a mlob mCe7 a n L
t u
wi h o uin aa n. e meAr I !
c r
e o 9
s i
et h a wo r
f pt h. rh nh oc e
. e i
nmh
- e oh e ua nd p-e s
ic 1
f o poiNg c n
d p
na n S
prf n
of s
= e me aCa hond wl e s d sL e
s f
a f
um e a s a A s v
n u eLt L pe onl m i T.h t h I
h 'n D Ci pahGwMr e
5 5 h et L b
dh dh
- m. lia v
n r
r s r n
e3 s e eh nTn s5 r
I lee hsTe e6b s
hr t
- e a
r g o et b
a c of. s c
1 t
o h
- h. a te t
d efod.
pta3 e9i
( h e in h a I
oe u
n r> of E
.i i
gh. o gJ m d s
t d
ea 5h e aLpt n
t t
Twuo s. d iola1 h prl cP u n t
aN a nRr c7 e (g m M N e
n e ta mw u r
a S maOoal h
h g
l 9
t mt pmh rd e ue eS l
mi o7 e1 ssemi m b ud opcodCms Amk b n9 d l
a q
r c
c f
s Ca eS h me ie a
e e
n g gn L
a en nd qn3h eeSh c
i r ll nr7N A1 e 2 y io1 whho(
whCt n
r gah 7.
h 7 b rf aE a2 etki hCa h 9 nh s s h
es t
wmh ra o. a t
c e t
s t
pesl s a a
F e e e ef 8 u7Cb nr ms imsSAt i
e F id w t
mie d
ai h
1 s
i n u n r
dO.ir mn3 ed t
t n
5 es eC2 f
g a h t' L 5
b c e - ef r u7 ihk
, e t
c n
h r
o9 ud gk ia 5 e c w ah tun c chh uei e
u, e 1mgm1 pn na n
r 1
a s
F h5 g h mob 2
I u
upa i ed o4 np1nfof p
e u
a wtgn i
t 0 meS ly m@el gt si to
=h dRd wn a, p oremh.%nur e
hi aie i
t f
s s
a w e e u
h pft n h
e ne uous p
r o
h m l l f t
e5 NJh e dh i
t e a a h
r r
o
,f d d y
@hl e
o t
mh bl eT r
c ri aue wi uh hhQnr ppnMl
= T. f d e ed n.Cd hsa$
r d
c s
t a edO o
ec e -
- d om t
t eh h
c e ad
(
f nmrTt u
pa f
o t
er gi h rdf r s tuI sF S e
o7 ef d 7 n9 r onl p1
) ee&e@ner ts t
e e edd e a
s s luL h mh mMe7 a
i d
Wt n me r r eaie Hs Ch r
e n
a ta r
8 taF h e P s f
v eF n seb 9ms f MCh adn9dMa1 eaie 6 s h n a a c
t y
oi h
.Re rl s
r r o1 e nf o uL vh1 ms a n1 b
e s
s e n
s e p h
h 'nemm2 ns uf o. ul e n e i
.t r
S a ar i
t for a ei wd1 3 lu i
e t f a mems imdl ai9 h
a s c eNss a n h
g r oh a
4 r a
sMwc oh. u uia te bl n af n
sW b ms o9 fu5 we616 oel 1
a r
g b @C u s
d J
t L
le nC e m yk t
a t
e s
r a oie ue( hh ol s
e we t
G ah1 5h w
. e
.s ne u
r ol dT dh f
s h s n
iwnr nia%gmmihid e m m u
L' e
p e w a e c 5
s e
- ms A7 t
ace.n4 nnf mh ri ts l a n mdht u
i 1
i mt 3f h h
a g
s d!
7dTb n>n e
- u ai unr a s
s a o rf S e t
a mn 2 ts a
a ds nAuu ohhse ws ewl t
T I
u e
os os h eaa a
t a
Niw 9 o a s
l
.f r
n. u cf a
en i e e
d x
c e cd mt e S - ic t
a r
e l
1 nmb nhm uhpo2 d o h g h
>n1 n
4 uC t
e wt p t
t
,h e u r
ni n=
nl e
e on el sdf ino e
tn od e o i
gl ot r t
d o pb odsh ta ed ah i aK o ni e
hMl't e n
geW
- a. n+
n. na f
r i
manps t d 1
eI e a
nw inios t
r h n g
l a
u e r a a mr o L0 s
i i aomt pnf a
h p f
s e
ad ul a
o r
6 p u C n h A g~o n
- e. h m h k" i m lo'nmgN s
r r n
a n 3
oMe e t
m hi mnd gd n ma neh3 laSi r r r
s n
u u a ut st h s sh e
oa r
r o
f chb n m
nE f ea ma rh eh oo4mnpot r
a q r
pe t
u t
s a
s l
d ei uh7
(
n m h i m a D. 6 won Mll f e n
kdI O nS o
t MM1 CGDGin' 7( t nd. hd 9 o e i a
r r eF at e
nO t
ee e u ef f
S3Si P. hpC weh C
a sd ur d h o oe ob o d s y
t cdd maf h
l iI
~
i
%rehis&diug owdh modi mhb ovh eh n n
)
eg s -
e ef e e r
s 1.
eN gW me u
m i aN 2$
e l
4m41 1
8 o
nw pS 4
t t
l n
nnt u f
n
,I h
nh I
nCf ma u
L d
s s
p h
t f
n i "
o5 e ei i i o a e e o s
s u
o e
tn r
t A gd t h nh u
" et uf w"i eh sdt t r
z a n i f S
ih"d d
e ni e d ebet hih8 n.
m" e
"db ne ah a t
a wt ' s
" i e o"a r
a e in e
u pd f tin"n mhI ra r ur t la9 m d h o
pt peh ub 7
me "
r r
i s
s gt e s e
o nU m
r o oMe nheh nlb pd 1
,u t
a o
% *w-
- g;%3[fy @w
/
c n p "" oup" u
c a
h %t s mn a
r r
a a
a s t
b t.
t me'"f mt "
r J
wf fa ral a
e Q
e
.n e
idn"na o
p x
tr '
m a n e w"i en"5 n) la rb a
r e u
ip s
o yn "
I'.o.
e c e3 w
t
' me nl o j
d c "" "
1 aa a
e o
u a
h t
wih,e" '
a j ne s l
n "" r" h al n
a' d
ed e
t.
n n
r o~
n6
- teh, an d
r u n a n o""w u" ygI e
t e '
ma r
p]i u - JM p
s d
"d
["
e c nat mh i me o"h ta e r n
h t
n e
t ah
'h
[
i f.
e n d
- hr fo#
r 1
["
(
t
["g g
t n
nt o
9 u
I.
5'e n
'd ny
" ' L s u 4,
r No"&4 oowH M"*
. ud ei o
o ju%%d m
N md.
gm,%wg f le 1
ed g
s f
u 3
i bg h
o L'
ol mge p W y; W e H
2 a
b e e
n 7,,b 5, O o Pb > H 7' w,l s
e h e h
pi M
h e
gm,% baw i ed4 i
b e
m b h n b g pi luy o t
e h
p u
e md wt e S
ga n) nid s
n
., inrNh N,'
. h a r
l s,
d a m
n, u p
ys a2 e e
r s r
n L
oi mCs jn qd g
ps ed G
e os nm gd tns 1
uf f r
s a
Wt3""3gfll 9
Y gd i er,
- qoogt,
a e r
wAet r
a c e
u e
ar s s r
s h rN e
e n
spaeRb.
mm
.. s o ehgaand one e v
e v r h u
n e
mMbu d' u g n t
m ngh pt a
k uh e
a h
oe ni oed ons nn n
s a
i h i t Nl o u ],6 l 9Q o
m t
Wfd4b l
e tot e c a di oeds i
u u e u o
ef e
a a
Pt n ng d qc e
ot. c b
ci eh n"e hu e end u t
n a nr n s
s n e u u
J L s e mripe a eiL h r
n e
i c e
e hd t
p tboi pq h e a
p9 'c eD aRi s
n s
a.un ei s
N 6
t l mh p a md ns h t e%f i si ud s s
" p n1 f
a x
A n,1,4 m"
a oc r n r s e o"oh
>si uf hs a a i
a rI pa t lu aa luh e io nmh n"h n
(
g P h
u eh i
- n CI
- f,p% a of et h k
h on
~hf h n"ut s
A b r
f d
s o
a or M
- N)p*v%mm%g a
c e u r
r i
f h h
o m
m e#
d h
'o m r(
c mw a
e foe h b e u
t a ' \\ ]
y gMidh
%e 5
p pn feh e
2 u "
ih n
r d f
s t
pM bW e
'~
"h ned pwed]
Lb6 M L e
u e n
e I
aPahk y; b - h n
'S 8
4 e
- 4 q
t i t
t
" e '
d a ou em w $,oeqN ra e$8gu.z ou uE $ %uu< '
jil l
~
A tactient t o'
! ~, '
K.S9000298 1
No hslu tm Gril as sinr.ururalin riulangencil ni Nelna5La (I n L l' age 30 of 33 11 1977) wrie iininngril at enbre St.uinn 'l un ski y.u L liri sinu, win < li l
ine i t.milical as ilocao 2.ril in lima litoma 1977). weir unpingni at
[4:
1( S anel the lilne 'tu Leis uin<
en e e l.milicil as lair in klimnii 8
(llnlt el al, l97 l), writ' inijsiligrtl at (;NS
'1
- 1 e
p l
I l
e i
i I
$1.7 45.2 $17 42A
.I l
l
.I 1974 1975 1976 19??
j20-g I
i i
i l
.I I
I 15 I
fl i
.I i
W s
si.
. l!
j t
f I I
i li: i: i i
- io-e a
I
!,k.
e!!
wg se'is,j(={.
3 I
6 i
j
- il 8.
s.
i ei i
h s iliif g*!g:;r hilidl
,I r-N w-r h-n r,
Jan feb Mar Apr May June Jul Aug Sep Oct Nnv Dec li Cooper Nuctene Station 60-g i t '-
55' I
I e
p I
. h..
g50' I
I I
i I
i I
ig z
l 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 l
45~
g' y
g a
f
,,40-I l
g g
I b
=
- i. ;
d
I I
I f
~ 30 1
I I
gi l l 1.;
3-I I
I I
I
-if d
h; i.
g1 j
ggg p
2s-2 g
g g
g t
120 I
I I
I p
i f 1
IC~
z 15' I
I I
I of I
i 8 g
I I
I I
f I f a
ilf I
{'
I fqi;'
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dm:
[t e-,
fort Calhoun Nuclear Stetton 3 (I '
Figure 9.5, Numhcr of fish impinstrelli in each mnnib of 19711977 at if
.h,a Cooper Nuricar Station arul inet Calhoun Sentinn, m
t3.,
. r, n k
I,N ff
- 9. u.
ilf 3
.._ ~,_..~.
1 Table 9.2.
Sumary of differential imotility and mcrtality (discharge immotility and mortality minus intake) for total zooplankton following condenser passage at Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973 76.
2 o
.hr 1973 1974 1974 1976 Q
8 Ottterenttal h t er Ottgerenttal Wt er Differenttat we er 19tfforen tal O
pt I t i t. /We t al it y teet 111 t y /%c t alit y Te=ceraturetC3 fanw.e t t s t y!*he r allt.
Temperature (C)
Twaar 111t yl*rt a t try Te w rattrefC) 1 War n 0 hr e nr Di sc h,s rae eT 0 hr 4 tic Di sc ha r ge aT 0 hr 6 hr na sc harte eT 4 hr 4 ne g
i h m ury b
13.4 13.4
- 6. 0C 0.9 22.0 21.0 2.1
- 3. 3c
}
Tebr ary 12.8 12.2 7.6 2.1 21.9 18.6 1.6 6.2 C
Ma rc h 6.1 1.8 7.5 4.0c g$,5 g3,3 7,7c 10.7 15.6 15.0 3.3 t.9 0
C C
2 q.r il 17.0 11.5 6.1 0.4 23.9 16.3 2.8 6.ge May 23.0 2.5 12.7C 11.S 26.1 8.6 6.4e 3, 3e 24.5 6.5 12.6 24.3C Q
C C
c June 11.1 0.0 32.0 7.5 3.3 f.le 27.5 7.5 12.0c g,7 11,5 10.1 6.8 6.6 C
-4 e
N July 8.S*
8.1" 31.3 5.3 13.6 16.5*
35.8 8.4 38.&
19.6 35.0 8.0 5.9
- 13. 3C C
C r
A.ag : s t 12.3 d.t 31.5 8.7 15.he 6.7 35.6 8.6 34.Z 23.;c 34.0 9.0
- 12. 7 7.9 g
C C
C 0
C 2.3 27.0 9.0 2 *. Te 7, ge 21.1 5.0 0.0 2.5 29 0 7.5 8.0C 0.0 Sept mber 18.3 m
October 5.3 0.3 21,4
". 9 6.6 5.2 November 6.9 11.2 17.0 10.0 6.0 9.7 13.9 7.9 a.1 2.5
'6.5 13.0 0.6 1.0 0
C C
C C
m Oce*ber 10.3 8.8 8.6C 17.0 16.0
- 7. 7C 7.8C 25.0 26.0 11.5C
- 9. 7C g
4 Mesa 9.5 3.0 8.9 6.6 7.1 5.4 6.1
- 7. 3 i
I
- z>
=e-a Heat not transferred across condensers.
"o e "e i
m b Samples not collected.
Significant (P s 0.05) based on chi-square analyses.
v.-.8 E C
os va o o e :s m CD rt U
et W
O s