ML20079J210
| ML20079J210 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/1983 |
| From: | Williams J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079J200 | List: |
| References | |
| PNS-LI-83-592, NUDOCS 8401240253 | |
| Download: ML20079J210 (2) | |
Text
'
n:
~
g \\ll/,
.., g r, p
]d S FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
. r 4
December 16, 1983 PNS-LI-83-592 v
Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street NW, Suite 2900 Atl anta, Georgi a 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
\\
Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 l
Inspection Report 83-35 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.
There is no proprietary information in the report.
Very truly yours, J. W. Willi ans, Jr.
Vice President Nuclear Energy Department JWW/JEM/js Att achment cc:
Harold F. Reis, Esqui re PNS-LI-83-742 g
8401240253 840106 PDR ADOCK 05000250 G
PDR PEOPLE.. SERVING PEOPLE
{
]
.'J.
ATTACHMENT
]
Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4-Docket Nos.'50-250 and 50-251 _
IE-Report Nos. 50-250/83-35 and 50-251/83-35 I
i-Finding 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Section TQR of the F1orida Power & Light Topical Report FPL-NQA-100, requires activities l
.affecting quality to be accomplished in accordance with documented procedures which include appropriate acceptance criteri a. -
FSAR Section 14.3.2-7 indicates valves which receive a safety signal (S-
- Signal) to operate within 25 seconds to be consistent with the safety injection system design assumptions.
Figure 6.2.1 of the FSAR indicates that Valves M0V-3-744A and MOV-3-744B receive an S-Signal.
l l
Contrary to the above, procedures for the -accomplishment of activities affecting quality did not. include appropri ate acceptance criteri a, in that the valve test progran for Unit.3 specified 60 seconds as the maximum acceptable l-stroke time for Valves M0V-3-744A and M0V-3-744B.
This is a Severity Level V Vi01ation (Supplement I).
RESPONSE
1.
We concur with the finding.
r 2.
Valve Nos. M0V-3-744A and 744B were inadvertently cl assified as a " slow-acting" valve with a stroke time based on valve size of 60 seconds.
I i
3.
Turkey Point Unit No. 3 Inservice Test Progran was revised to include a I
maximum limiting stroke time of 24 seconds for valve Nos. MOV-3-744A and 7448. The revised IST Progran was submitted and implemented June 30, 1983.
.4.
A review of the Turkey Point Unit Nos. '3 & 4 Updated FSAR is currently in progress to verify that the maximum limiting time specified in the Inservice Test Progran is consistent with the FSAR.
5.
The revised IST Progan has been in compliance since June 30, 1983.
Further, review of plant records show that the actual measured stroke L.
times for either valve No. MOV-3-744A or MOV-3-744B, was less than 14 seconds wnich is well within the maximum time assumed in the Safety j,
An alysis.
L I
~
r I
-, -~