ML20079G318

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept Re Welding of ASME Iii,Class 1 Joints Using ASME Iii,Class 2 & 3 Welding Procedures, Initially Reported 820429.Ten ASME Iii,Class 1 Joints Welded Using Class 2 & 3 Procedures.Final Rept Expected by 820831
ML20079G318
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/26/1982
From: Rhode G
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8206080396
Download: ML20079G318 (2)


Text

,

NUMOHAWK Y NIAGARA t

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE, N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 May 26, 1982 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region I Attention:

Mr. R. W. Starostecki, Director Division of Resident and Project Inspection 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Starostecki:

Enclosed is an interi:n 30-day report in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) for the potentially reportable deficiency regarding the welding of certain ASME III, Class 1 joints using ASME III, Class 2 and 3 welding procedures. This condition was reported by telephone to Mr. H. Kister, of your staff, on April 29, 1982.

Very truly yours, NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION

,A/

)

LGe/%W7p

' U

/

x rald K. Rh de j Senior Vice President PM:ja xc: Director of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. R. D. Schulz, Resident Inspector 8206080396 820526 PDR ADOCK 05000410 S

PDR G

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410 Interim Report for a Potentially Reportable Deficiency Under 10CFR50.55(e) Regarding the Welding of ASME III, Class 1 Joints Using ASME III, Class 2 and 3 Welding Procedures Description of the Deficiency Ten (10) ASME III, Class 1 joints were either partially or completely welded using ASME III, Class 2 and 3 welding procedures. An additional ninety-two (92) ASME III, Class 1 joints were identified on the contractor's planners (travellers) for welding using the same improper welding procedures.

Installation of the additional ninety-two (92) welds had not begun at the time this condition was discovered.

This matter is still under investigation. A final report will be submitted by August 31, 1982.

_