ML20078A347
| ML20078A347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/21/1983 |
| From: | Bernabei J, Bernabei L GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, STAMIRIS, B. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, ISSUANCES-OM, NUDOCS 8309230173 | |
| Download: ML20078A347 (157) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKETED NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USNRC Before the' Atomic Safety and Licensing Boarf a3 SB' 22 P2:42 In the Matter of:
)
Docket Nos. 50-329-OL
)
50-3@gq0LOF SECRGAir CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
50-3%,gedhflNG & SERVICE
)
5 0-3 30-010 RANCH (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF INTERVENOR BARBARA STAMIRIS' MOTION TO LITIGATE DOW ISSUES Intervenor Barbara Stamiris submits the following supple-
- mental memorandum in support of her motion to litigate Dow issues.
I.
BACKGROUND On August 8, 1983, intervenor Barbara Stamiris submitted a motion to litigate issues raised by the Dow Chemical Company in its suit against Consumers Power Company, filed July 14, 1983.
The three issues raised by the Do w Complaint, which intervenor argued presented important new evidence on appli-cant's poor management attitude were the following:
(1)
Applicant misrepresented its schedule for completion of the two Midland plants to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
("NRC"), including the NRC ttaf f and this Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
(" Licensing Board");
(2)
Applicant used and relied on U.S. Testing test results to f ulfill NRC regulatory requirements even though it knew the test results were invalid; and (3)
Applicant knowingly misrepresented to the NRC that a single test boring taken near the diesel generator building 9309230173 830921 PDR ADOCK 05000329 G
PDR 0 503 demonstrated that unmixed cohesive fill had been used as a foundation.
On August 17, 1983, applicant filed a lengthy response to intervenor's motion and offered to allow the parties and the Board to review a number of documents provided to Dow prior to its filing suit against Consumers ("the Dow docu-ments").
In a conference call on August 25, 1983, this Licensing Board deferred ruling on intervenor's motion and request for discovery until such time as all parties had a chance to review'the Dow documents.
On September 14, 1983, applicant's counsel submitted a three-page lerter and a fifth box of documents to the Licen-sing Board and the parties.
Applicant presented a new argument in th is letter that because the 1980 NRC Caseload Forecast Panel estimated completion dates only three months later than Consumers, the information Consumers disclosed on schedule to the NRC was accurate.
Unfortunately both Consumers and the NRC were wrong by at least three years.
Moreover, these and other documents obtained by inter-venor's counsel, the Government Accountability Proj ect
(" GAP")
1.
Mr. Brunner's letter is clearly an unauthorized pleading.
However, intervenor will no t object to its filing since the documents submitted in support of the pleading support intervenor's position.
Further, many of the documents and arguments are s imply irrelevant to the dispute before this Board.
,w
-+
pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") demonstrate that the NRC Staff has had long debates about the accuracy of applicant's schedule figures.
However, it has always been true even up'through the present, that an informed segment of the NRC Staff has estimated completion dates years ahead of Consu-mers.
Further, these completion dates have been revised after Consumers Power has exerted pressure to make the Panel conform their dates to Consumers' figures.
An inf ormed and siz eable segment of the NRC Staff has always held the opinion that Consumers' figures are inaccurate and unreliable.
Even a cursory reading of the Dow documents reveals that the fuel load dates Consumers presented to the NRC Staff from July, 1980, until April, 1983, indicate Consumers knew the figures were false and used them in the face of tough ques-tioning by a sizeable segment of the NRC Staff.
Moreover it appears that Bechtel did not use these comple-tion dates but the Bechtel Forecast 6 schedule to plan con-struction work.
In these circumstances it appears Consumers deliberately submitted false figures to the Commission.
Intervenor submits this Supplemental Memorandum to support its claim that the documents Consumers released support Dow's and intervenors' allegations that Consumers knowingly misrepre-sented the scheduled completion dates for the two Midland plants.
2.
Intervenor does not address the second and third issues she believes are raised in the Dow Complaint.
If the Board should rule that she may not litigate these issues as manage-ment attitude issues, Mrs. Stamiris requests the opportunity supplemental memorandum demonstrating how the to submit a Dow documents substantiate these allegations.
i II.
DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY CONSUMERS DEMONSTRATE THAT CONSUMERS AND BECHTEL DELIBERATELY MAINTAINED A DUAL SCHEDULE AND MISLED THE NRC ABOUT COMPLETION DATES FOR THE TWO MIDLAND REACTORS.
Bechtel released its Forecast 6 in January, 1980.
In Forecast 6 Bechtel calculated the fuel load dates for Unit 1 to be Sep' ember, 1984 and for Unit 2 to be April, 1984.
t On January 15, 1980, K.
R.
Kline requested that a Forecast Review Team evaluate Bechtel Forecast 6.
The Review Team was comprised of staff from Consumers' home office, field offices,
, testing staff and Control and Administrative Services.
This team concluded that it generally agreed with Bechtel on cost and schedule; it recommended a total proj ect estimate based on Forecast 6 Cost and Schedule figures.
See Kline/Randolph Memo of May 5, 1980, Attachment 7 to Applicant's August 17, 1983 Response, Intro, at 1-4; History / Background at 7.
On June 25, 1980, Consumers and Bechtel held an " Executive Management Meeting."
At that meeting Consumers and Bechtel agreed to establish target dates of July, 1983 and December, 1983 for fuel load of Units 2 and 1, r e s p e c t iv ely.
These dates were based on the assumption that the scope of work at the project would not be in c r ea s ed.
This assumption was clearly 1
invalid as the magnitude of the soil s settlement problems became apparent.
See July 31, 1980 Mollenkopf Memo on 6/25/80 Meeting at 4-5, to Applicants' 8/17/83 Response.
On July 10, 1980, Mr. Rutgers reported that Bechtel would maintain two sets of cost and schedule figures.
The first figures were defined as the " current proie-t schedule."
The l
current project schedule listed fuel load dates for Unit 2 as
_-. _ _j July, 1983.
(Consumers agreed to use the term " target schedule" for these fuel load dates.)
Bechtel was instructed to use these target or current project schedules in all correspondence with Consumers and in all documents intended for public consumption.
Bechtel was to continue to use its Forecast 6 schedule or the " current fore-cast" to plan and control its construction worx.
As stated in to the Rutgers' Meeting Notes, " Forecasting is an ongoing schedule monitoring and control process which indicates the responsible team members' evaluation of construc-tion scope, duration, and time-of-accomplishment."
Obviously Consumers directed Bechtel to keep two schedules one false and inaccurate and the other based on Forecast 6 to gu id e its work.
See generally, Rutgere Notes of 7/10/80 Meeting, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 1.
In its August, 1980 Cost Trend Report submitted to Consu-mers Bechtel carried out these d ir e c t ion s.
In its earlier June and July 1980 Cost Trend Reports Bechtel presented two schedule I
columns for each reactor:
A Trend Base Schedule and an Actual l
Forecast.
The " Actual Forecast" schedules were the Forecast 6 l
fuel load detes.
See Cost Trend Schedules for June, 1980, and July, 1980, attached and incorporated herein as Attachments 2 and 3.
l The August Cost Trend Report has the two " actual forecast"
\\
3.
Apparently the July, 1980, Cost Trend Report was prepared before the July 10, 1980 Management Meeting in which Bechtel l
was ordered to remove the forecast column from the Cost Trend Reports.
l l
l columns literally " whited out" or cut out.
The form of the i
chart which appears in the Bechtel cost trend reports does not l
change over the years up through 1983, even though all columns except for the current proj ect schedule columns remain blank. This leads one to believe that Bechtel maintained the two sets of figures in the cost trend reports it kept for its own use. Not until April 27, 1983 do the current project schedule dates change.
See April, 1983 Cost Trend Report Schedule, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 4.4 In a June 10, 1981 project management meeting, Bechtel and Consumers apparently discussed the internal proj ect schedules.
Don Miller expressed his concern that intermediate proj ect schedules had not been formally coordinated.
John Rutgers sug-gested compiling a fully coordinated schedule of interim con-struction dates.
But James Cook vetoed the idea, apparently because Consumers did not want Bechtel to compile another com-i p r ehen s iv e set of schedule forecast figures, such as Forecast 6.
See Rutgers Meetings Notes of 6/25/81 Meeting, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 6.
The Dow documents, therefore, illustrate that Consumers ordered Bechtel not to disclose to Consumers any schedule data other than the inaccurate schedule for public consumption, using fuel load dates of July and December, 1983.
Moreover it is clear that Consumers, from the Summer of 1980 until April, 1983, did i
4.
The two actual forecast schedule columns inexplicably appear in the January, 1981 Bechtel Cost Trend Report, and then disappear until April, 1983.
See April, 1983 Cost Trend Report schedule, attached and incorporated herein as Attach-ment 5.
1 l
i
~
. did not change these fuel load dates, even when it knew the Bechtel Monthly " Critical Items Action Reports" were reporting throughout 1981 and 1982, delays of 10 months and more.
- See, e.g.,
Bechtel Critical Items Action Reports for November, 1981 and December 1981, attached and incorporated herein as Attach-ments 7 and 8.
III.
FROM AUGUST, 1980 UP TO THE PRESENT THE NRC STAFF HAS BEEN DIVIDED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF CONSUMERS' COMPLETION DATES In August, 1980, after the release of Forecast 6, the NRC Staff came to a preliminary estimate of f uel load dates of May, 1984 and November, 1984 for Units 2 and 1, re s p e c t iv ely.
See Sullivan Telecon Record of 8/12/80; and Sullivan Telecon Record of 8/18/80, attached and incorporated herein as Attachments 9 and 10.
Only after Consumers exerted pressure on the NRC Staf f, through numerous meetings, did William Lovelace agree to revise the NRC Staff estimate to bring it in line with Consumers' fuel load dates of October, 1983 and April, 1984.
See Sullivan Meet-ing Notes of 8/25/80 attached and incorporated herein as Attach-ment 11.
On September 16, 1980, the Staff publicly announced that its fuel load dates substantially agreed with Consumers', dif f er-ing by three months.
See Hood Summary of 8/25/80 Meeting, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 12.
5.
In compiling Forecast 7, Bechtel did not estimate construc-tion completion dates.
Rather it assumed the target fuel load dates of 1973 and determined an estimated cost based on these dates.
_ Hidden behind the 1983 NRC Caseload Forecast Panel comple-tion dates is a similar debate.
The Caseload Forecast Panel in May, 1983 estimated fuel load dates in the third quarter of 1986, not taking into account delays caused by consideration of the Construction Completion Program and time necdad for rework and corrective action.
See Draft Novak Letter, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 13.
This draft letter was never sent.
Instead Consumers succeeded in convincing the NRC Staff to cancel three public meetings scheduled during theSummer of 1983.
Finally, after a FOIA request and administrative appeal by GAP, the NRC Staff released a revised case load forecast of fuel load dates in the third quarter of 1985.
Mr. Novak's letter dated August 9, 1983, varies significantly in tone and substance from his earlier draft letter.
See Novak Letter of August 9, 1983, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment 14.
Consumers convinced the NRC to cancel three successive public meetings during the Summer of 1983 and ultimately con-vinced the Caseload Forecast Panel to shave an entire year off its estimated construction completion dates for the Midland plants.
See Affidavit of Billie Garde and exhibits, attached
(
and incorporated herein as Attachment 15.
Just as in 1980, an informed segment of the panel wished i
r l
to inform the Licensing Board and the public'of the NRC esti-i mates, which differed from the applicant's figures by at least two years.
Through pressure exerted on the NRC Staff, Consumers p
l l
l l
succeeded in delaying any public meeting and forcing the NRC Staff to radically revise its original completion dates.
It is obvious from the Caseload Forecast Panel's original estimates in 1980 and again in 1983 that at least a portion of the NRC Staff has had grave doubts about the accuracy and reliability of information provided by Consumers.
Yet under 1
constant pressure from Consumers the NRC Staff has been willing i
to change its forecast dates to conform more closely to those of Consumers.
In these c ir c um s ta n c e s, the NRC Staff may see that liti-gation of the dual schedule issue will be embarrassing to the NRC Staff.
Nonetheless the significance of this issue to the decisien baf ore this Board is beyond argument.
Clearly Con-aumers' duty to report full and accurate information to the NRC Staff and this Licensing Board at all times is absolute.
Consumers' failure to report accurate information about pro-jected completion dates to the NRC from 1980 to the present is highly probative of its un trustworthiness today to carry out the sensitive soils remedial nork, even under strict Board-imposed controls.'
IV.
CONCLUSION j
For the foregoing reasons, intervenor respectfully requests this Licensing Board to allow 1itigation of the three Dow l
l issues described above and reopen discovery against the NRC Staff and Consumers regarding these issues.
t
. _ ~ -
. 4 Respectfully submitted, W
L LY BERNABEI i
G(
RNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT Institute for Policy Studies 1901 que Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009 (202) 234-9382 Counsel for Intervenor Barbara Stamiris DATED:
September 21, 1983 i
l 1
l l
l l
l l
_ ~,
- 4.{, *.
ATT?.CU2:!T 1 00954B rs July 16, 1980 k$k $$
3LC-9466 Consumers Pover Company 9
1945 West Parnall Road JUL 1 a1980 Jackson, Michigan 49201 BECHTEL POWER CORP JOB 722 pga M W @ 0 Attention: Mr. J.W. Cook Yice President MJ Midland Project gubject: Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Consu=ars Power Company Bechtel Job 7220' Trans ittal of Midland Project Team Meeting Notes Attached are tha notes cf the July 10, 1980, Midland Project Management Team r.aeting conducted at the Midland jobsite.
Corrections to these notes, if required, vill be considered during the next project team manageme.nt meeting to be held on August 14, 1930, in
!~
Ann Arbor (tentative).
1 The following dates have been set aside each month for the Midland l
Project Management Team meetings:
Septe=ber 11, 1980 November 13, 1980 i
October 9, 1980 Leca=her 11, 1980 (Time and Place to be determined)
Please call if you have any goestions.
Very t y yet.rs, W
John A.
.gers Project Manager i
JAR /kes l
Attac ht: Midland Project Manage =ent Team Meeting Notes No.1179 ec: Mr. C.S. Keeley bec:
R.C. Ash; M.N. Bakarich/J.F. Miller; L.H. Curtis
..-d.R.g.. A,q L. A. Dreisbach; GT
)
Response Requested: No W.G. Jone
..n r (all v/a)
~
1 Com Use: N/A l
1
1
~
Bdchtel Power Corporation h.
- 02. -
009546 777 East Eisenhower Par.kway I
ann um.pn.,an m rup...: P.o. som 1000. Ann Atbor Michgan as1os
~
HEETING NOTES No. 1179 HIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
.BECHTEL JOB 7220 DATE:
July 10, 1980 PLACE:
Midland Jobsite SUBJECI:
Midland Project Nanagement Meeting FILE:
ATTENDEES:
Bechtel Consumers Power Company J.A. Rutgers J.W. Cook M.N. Bakarich C.S. Keeley L.H. Curtis K.R. Kline L.E. Davis D.B. Miller
- L.A. Dreisbach T.J. Sullivan W.C. Jones A.R. Hollenkopf (represented by Ken Cross)
- Part-time ITEMS DISCUSSED:
l 1)
Neeting Logistics and Conduct John Rutgers proposed that project management meetings be held
(
monthly, alternate between Ann Arbor and Midland, be chaired by Bechtel, and follow a specified agenda (see Attachment 1). He also indicated that the project administrator would record the meeting minutes. The group agreed to the proposal with the following modifications / clarifications:
l a)
The location vill be determined based on convenience of presenting agenda items.
b)
Agendas should be published at least 1 week in advance.
c)
Status of drawings and design changes should be included in the
" Briefing" section of the agenda outline.
L
-.,5 Huting Nstes No.1179 Ptgo 2, -
d)
Attendees should be advised of problems to be discussed as 509546
- r2r *8 practicable, but at least 2 weeks in advance, as w
indicated in the agenda outline (Attachnent 1, section 11-3.1).
e)
Farsonnel asked to make presentations should be notified of '
the requirement as soon as possible.
f)
Part II-B.3 of the Attachment 1 outline is intended for discussion of adverse trends.
i g)
Minutes of meetings should indicate tasking. Bechtel_and Constaners Power Company should follow-up on the tasking.
.=
h)
Constaners Power Company will smdertake as a project the identification of l
issues and administration of a 90-day decision concept.
ACIl0N STATEMENT:
Revise Attachment 1 to reflect these agreements and follow in preparation of subsequent. agendas.
A'CIl0N ASSIGNMENT: " John Rutgers 2)
Status Reporting and Schedule and Budget Development Bill Jones presented Bechtel's definition of current project schedule, current project forecast, current budget, and current budget forecast (Attachments 2 and 3). In addition, he proposed,a reporting system for keeping managenent advised of the status of the project and provided an estimate of the latest budget adjusement. The following were brought out during his presentation:
a)
The definitions were accepted as Bechtel's.
Specifically, Bechtel plans to use a mechanism of assuring that current project scope is reflected.in the current budget which ties to the currene project schedule.
9 4
b)
- Forecasts will ref1 et work-around p. ens to achieve the currect 1
k project schedule.
Correspondence between Bechtel and Consumers Power Company and items for public consts:p'. ion will list fuel load dates in the current project schedule.]
c)
In August, Bechtel will publish the auxiliary building 18-nonth sched ule.
i d)
Constzn:rs Power Company engineers, working with Bechtel engineers, should learn plans in detail and work from the front of the plans, not replow old ground (i.e., work the plan now).
e)
Bechtel will develop the current budget, based on the current scope and current project schedule (7/31/83, Unit 2 fuel load) and i
transmit it to Constzners Power Company by August 15, 1980.
4 g)
Consumers Power Company is holding in reserve 58 million of the Bechtel 1980 cash flow forecast of $195 million.
'. ~
,a,
Meeting Nstos Ns. 1179 Pese 3 h)
Project status reports should be in the hands of project management
$9546 t- =6=
PProximately 2 days prior to monthly meetings.
1)'
Civen the Project Status Report, a quarterly " historical" report is not required.
j)
To measure progress against the schedule, the monthly status samary should be revised to include a column titled " Scheduled Accumula tive."
k)
The monthly status samary should include the change and hold i
status of drawings.
1)
Bechtel will clean up the June 1980 advance. copy of the Project Status Report. Revisions will include:
1.
Deletion of last sentence on MCAR 24 (Page 19) 2.
Deletion of old forecast load dates and realignment of curves to reflect new dates 3.
More detail in the Engineering Manpower Status Table (Page 17) 4.
Determination of whether CIAR items should be included as problens.in the Project / Problem Action Sheet (not to be decided until report has been published several times) ciG 5-se t< n 1 P ite int Perr ne
>Pendi-ACIl0N STATEMENT:
- 1) Revise monthly status summary format.
- 2) Publish June 1980 Project Status Report.
- 3) Prepara current budget.
ACTION ASSIGNMENT:
Bill Jones 3)
Scope Control and Design Change Incorporation Gil Keeley proposed that we accelerate our means of implementing design chaeges. He questioned the need for the DCAR program. John Rutgers tasks.d the project administrator to review the DCAR program to see if it could be eliminated or, if not eliminated, streamlined.
ACTION STATDfENT:
Review, and if required, revise or eliminate DCAR i
program.
ACTION ASSIGNMENT: Mike Bakarich/ John Rutgers 4)
Project Engineering Priorities Lynn Curtis presented project engineering priorities. Jim Cook noted that priotity as going to long lead-time items for the auxiliary building and suggested priority be given also to all other long lead-time items. Lynn Curtis stated that this would be done. Don Miller noted that Bechtel had published an earlier u.
priority list (matrix form) and said' that 'there would be confusion
.-.,-,_.g...y
,.w,,,,-.-,----
..,,-.w
_.y
-,_-__-,p
-_.--,-,--,_..,.-,w.,_
.,,.,-,.._.,,.,-r
- _ = _ - _
Meeting Nstos Ns. 1179 Fcga 4, between the two published priorities. Lynn Curtis said the matrix D*39546
"'***"***d
- * * '"' P* " " " * * '"d * * * * "h * " ** 'k "" "'* 5 2 *
- 2 * -
not priorities. He said he had already issued instructions to change the matrix title to reflect its intent.
ACTION STATDfENT: Update priority list.to reflect agreements, then publish.
ACTION ASSIGNMENT: Lynn Curtis/ John Rutgers 5)
Short-Cutting Administrative Procedures Cil Keeley unphasized the continuing need to shorten administrative i
procedures. The group's concensus us that the problem is not with i
the procedures, but with the way Bechtel and Constsners Power Company follow them. Both John Rutgers and Jim Cook i_nstructed their people to notify them immediately when a requirement gets held up on administrative
~
procedures.
]
ACIl0N STATDfENT:
Notify iroject management on pere,eived administrative res1;rainta to timely action.
ACIlON ASSIGNMENT: All team members, as required 6)
FSAR Updste Plans Terry Sullivan provided a progress report on licensing / safety itensi He mentioned that the Master List of Licensing Activities had been updated and the review plan for Hidland was being placed today (7/ /80) on a Constuners Power Company-automated text management system and will be distributed for comment on July 18, 1980. He reported that a plan had been developed to address open items in the Question and Response i
volumes of the FSAR and that he intended to include the latest status of these in the October amendment. He concluded that Mr. Denton of the NRC will be available August 5,1980, and Constuners Power Company will be briefing him on or about that data regarding the suggested plan for conducting the FSAR review with the NRC.
ACIl0N ASSIGNMENT: None ACIION STATDfENT:
None 7)
Vendor Coatact for Qualifiestion Cil Keeley suggested that, in the interest of using the engineers more productively, it may be prudent to relieve Bechtel engineering of responsibility for the vendor contact required to pursue qualification.
i Bechtel accepted this suggestion with the proviso that a good division of responsibility, including QA a:pects, is wo-ked out for each order, with Bechtel retaining the responsibility for co=mercial communication with each vendor.
h.-
-___.-______.__--.,.-.-.--,.-.,--,_,,.-.--__-..-.__...,.--..._,..,.,-,.-._,..,,...,,_..,,rr m
.,r.. ;,
Heating Nstos No.1179 Frge 5 -
T,h.
ACTION STATDfENT:
Make decision on whether to pursue the suggestion.
NO95}cpicy3331caug37, 31,c,,ufc11 x,,1,7 8.
Next Heeting John Rutgers announced that the next meeting will be August 10, 1980, and agreed to publish a list of future meeting dates.
ACTION STATDENT: Publish a list of future meeting dates ACIION ASSIGNMENT: John Rutgers JAR /ceb 7/15/18 O
i l
l 1
1 l
C q
l l
u
Att:chment 1 Heating N2tes No. 117 E
009546
'* ' "^"^"'*'"'
- '*""8 Outline of Discussion I.
LOGISTICS i
A.
Frequency: Monthly 3.
Duration : 4 to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> C.
Location : Alternate between Ann Arbor and Midland Jobsite (Jackson 7)
D.
General Chairmanship:
Bechtel II.
CUTLINE AGEhTA Preparer /
Duration Presenter A.
Briefing I hour 1.
Schedule / cost (approx.)
WCJ/ ARM 2.
Manpower / staffing LHC/ LED /others 3.
Quality assurance WRP/ LAD i
4.
Licensing IJS 5.
. Other significant items As required g
4 ff )I B.
Project Problems / Action Su= mary 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> JAR 1.
Specific itens identified (approx.)
As required not later than 2 weeks prior to monthly project management meeting 2.
" Write-in" items identified As required not later than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> prior to monthly project management meeting 3.
Significant Performance Deviations As required C.
Decisions Needed I hour.
JWC/CSK 1.
90-day decisions table (approx.)
2.
Status of activities leading to decisions required within next 30 days D.
Other Topics for Discussion As required As required O
G M.
l
-.--.--r.-
,J.
Att:chesnt 2 Meeting Natos Ns.1179
\\
SCHEDULE
- b'D09546 CURRZNT PROJECT SCEEDULE The project schedule to be used for planning, scheduling, and e
measurement of performance at client direction e
i.e.; July 31, 1983. Unit 2 fuel load
'e CPCo equivalents. TARGET SCHEDULE CURRENT FORECAST i
e The Bechtel project team's most current evaluation of the project schedule. This evaluation need not be approved by the client e
i.e.; Forecast 6 April 1984 Unit 2 fuel load e
CPCo equivalent:
CURRINT SCHELULE Torecasting of schedule activities is an ongoing schedule monitoring and control process which indicates the responsible team members' evaluation.
of activity scope, duration, and time-of-acccomplishment.
The visibility of the current forecast of schedule activities is maintained for schedules at the intermediate level and below in the schedule hierarchy.
e 9
1 (7-
--,-----g g
y-,
,,,- --,, - - ~ - -, - - - -
@,'**,;{* *,,
- Attachasnt 3 M: sting Natos Ns. 1179 D
00~9546 coSr CURRENT BUDCET The budget based on the :urrent project schedule and scope o
approved by the client.
.plus All scope changes and trends evaluated and approved (resolved) e by Bechtel project management whether or not they have been submitted or approved (resolved) by the client CURRENT FORICAST
~
The Bechtel project team's most current evaluation of the e
project cost All trends resolved by Bechtel project management listether or e
mot they have been sent to the client will be included Based on the current schedule forecast and scope e
s G
d e
e
.r_,,,___,_,_,,_.._.
k",'"
I, f.TTACli"ENT 2 0012h0 BechtelPowerCorporation 008588 Amm Adeer. ' Wages awa e o em men,ammans,teenessmas Jene 2. 1988 MJ:-933L h-rs Feuer Campest 1943 East Parasu Rea" Jackson. Itichigas 49201 i
estantion tht. J.W. Cdek Vice President i
Itidiand Project i
Sebject: Itidiand Flaat Daits I sad 2 g
Ceesumers Feuer Ceepeep Sechtel Job 7120 l
Cost Tread Esport 6-4 g
4ttached for your informaties are seven septes of Cost Trend Esport 6-6 and the Cost Tread Register, dated May 20, 1980. New treads identified by this report are:
6.6C and 6.17 through 4.44 imelusive Zacloded in these are the fellowing trends which techtel ceseiders resolved and are new being incorporated into the greject plas.
6.6C Bolets Foru,esst 6 costs for the reactiaster petah penel trhich win set be required e
4.27 Talete Ferocast 6 costs for the condensate deafneraliser eggrade - Calles 11 m-4.28 ilete the unexpended engf aeering and other home office asabests for the tesic gaa aseitering posthesse 6.29 Itiatellae.eous engineertag and other home efffee changes 6.30 Opgrade the permanest plaat deustering Ferocast 4 Cowance to an estimate based es issued drawings 6.32 Naamal labor impact resulting from the tendes protectice precedures ras.uired by specificaties C-87 4.33 menust Beertup and Unie price startup l
6.34 Delete Ferocast 6 costs for the refueltag and af scellaneous l
etsipoest carriages es 70 Ik95 1
se
-+m 0012771 T.~ ~e
.7s s toes 8tC4321 008588
'*** 8 6 33 Add estimated sects for the Rydroges and Ettreges bulk storage pad and sentrol rees pressorisaties taak feendatione 1
6.36 Added emanal labor for the dieeal generster bs11 dias esecreta bleek installaties 6.37 deditiemal enheestract assistasse for senlaistraties building 6.34 Added anseel labor for insta11stfee of siesellaneens stael for diesel generater essersil 6.3s Additiemal concrete weather protecties 6.4e Temporary dewatering support 79 4.41 Added assaal labor for auxiliary building small pipe Lasta11 sties 6.43 Estimate of costs to prov2de an adniaistrattee building seeling tower to supply a temporary coeltag unter supply 6.44 Estlante of costs for replacing a secties of usia sesen lias pipe with a osaalass pipe speel Provisealy identified cost trends that have been revised by report are 6.6A Flast eseputer replacanest c
5echtal new esasiders this trend resolved P
84.63 Allowance for relocaties of the Esiley 855 plant computar 84.8 Increased unit asets over Ferocast 6 for fiew orifices v
- 4.9 Allevance for seats ever Fe, recast 6 for obtaining as alternate supplier for hydraulic end tars 86.11 Additiemal costs to add traveling screens to the circulattag unter intake 84.19 Lat status indicaties MLLA f 306 f acrease in cost
- 6.20 Belecartes of mais feedwater crosette velves for neds 4 operstice cosag.. to thesa La.ude incluse updates of action statements and
&se by whoe statements med met estimate changes er status changes.
t e_
I
mamme a
0012772
.r.a. 2. I n o me-nn 008586 nc.
the f.11e ins tre.d., *1.h.ere r.
19ed
.i der 11 17, Ino, r ein waresolved me of May to.1980, pending further review or directies.
63 Costs for shestaal cleaning of the etsas generators 6.68 Mieusace for relocaties of the Bailey 853 plant esapeter 6.7 M1easace for obtatalag acceptable vender drawinge 6.8
!acrossed unit eests ever Ferocast 6 for flew orifices 6.9 M1ewance for costs over Ferocaat 6 for obtaining as alternate supplier for the hydreu11e eaubbers e
4.15 M1euence for poteettal design shenges which any reesit ubes the tornado depressurisaties vesting T
analysis is sempleted v
4.11 Additiemal easts to add traveling screens to the airculating unter intake 6.12 Misumace for poteettal changes to our present desigs beeis for fire protecties 6.18 Eameval of weld backing rings fe'r venturis 4.19 Flaat statse todicaties ML1A #304 increase la cost 4
4.20 Belecaties of asia feeduster creestie valves for sede 4 operaties e
New trende this meeth teclude the following items identified as unresolved.
v 4.31 Process etaan line traneter valve bypees 6.42 Bater and sewer line to unrebesse Be 2 la aMition te the above status, seves (7) trende have been identified which remeis unevaluated for cast er schedule impact due to indeter-sinate er usavailable scope. These trends are discussed es Attacheent 2.
l l
l l
i
4W F= m tu.__..=
.._ _ ~,.,_
_,- = n w x
.--~.
0012773 E:
a 3
- 3. tese soo-,33:
008586 rasa
- r1...dn
.e if re. se
, w o n
.n n u.i t. ts..e,
specific acties beyond that (destified to the Cost Trend Register.
Tory y peers, g
/
John A. ants e Project Ms er JAR /WGJ/stl S/17/t Attacheats (7) 3.
Cost Trend Graph for Tread Report H 2.
Trends Unevelssted for Trend Esport 6-4 3.
Cast Tread Report H l
M 4.
Cost Trend Register 6-4, dated May 21, 1980
<=
est A S. Eseley w/o 5.3. Miller w/a -
~42:20 E 2 %.
1 1
l l
e 4
tlP 4
e-l l
l l
l t
l Response Requested: No I
m: wn.
m-~m r" u34.
.a
<.g~.arp' wwy"4
^ ^r '
v.
._g m-:-
w i.e..... ass.e -a n
-.-- wumm~ =>
- "T^$v$3Y
?
e l
i
cc1277,;
e.
.... =
PROJECT TRENDS asu m n u
T M le 8804 8 4
.me lee.: 7338 pe0ACT: Midead Uudes 1 & 3
(
ALL COST 3 41.000 Cast g gW arms crowa8 sum to imea as a awwa Presses Perseest
)
I TtW Tsan$
COST TREND ORAMt se One
-e00 I
J
- e
- See SW
- a0 400 360
-M 290
' 8
- 200
, C*
180 t
i e
,s===
' ~
J T)T4,L l
\\
3 l
-0
- eo e aeF a e is it ta t<ei; a e aeF e e to it is t sa l
FC No. 8)
TRENDS TWtu NCd6-TMMO NC 6-4 TOTAL TREMOS DATED. 4/17/80 SATED. $72T78C 70 DATE
, up
< s cost Thee sasE Pc see, a 1,rsa,soo 1,7sa.coe TREND $ AESOLVED D
Secte Chariges 28,400
-7.110 35,$10 l
f Ceter Chuges 4,650 (700) 3.950 NT ima04 YED CHMe0ES 33,050 6.410 39,460 Tsed Urreeshed St.330 1.250 82.580 TOTAL TRDGED 1.898.340 7.660 1,906,040 SCHEDUt.E TREND l
UNIT 08tE UserT TWO Tsupuf Sune Ashed Ts4p48 Some asass p
To gens Tsim Teeres Te Omus TM Taaret I
. Or E a
trf3 1'73 A srts gr73 A l
tem adAC ; Alt *ur=*
- f t??
19'? ? A 91/73 t trf 7 A l
De* Ce 6 73 tr?3 A tr73 6t? 3 A gr t.pur fuese 9014 torta A er7e e/78 A ase % sger ete Ste A Sie 6rve A ese two cessia arts arts A ese e<re A t**
1/84 ses3 10/83 sear % ;
a.n w woe 9/84 esa 4/84 e_
_ a c_ _
ese 6/85 ese 9/84
.eaTY June 1980 l 88W 08 o, ass b
m x.w4 mm..
=
.. ?
- k, ' N. 3 @ 3l ?l $ 7 2 M N W [ $ %.:
1
~
't s%".? 04 fTTACMCHT 3 d
een x x -
r.2== - "'
8echtel PowerCorporaIlonuur 804 4
a i
0004SS 2**
e.
Arwi Arter, techsgen f
,e, awammens PO Gas t000.aan amor.W as106
-~d "t"> L' _
~
July 15,1980 C@
su.-9462
)
y Connemmers Power Company 194) Idest Parnall Road
_/_ OM.
l d
i
?,
1 Jackson, Michigan 49201 Z
3 Atteetteet Mr. J.V. Cook
-~'
f Vice President l
Midland Project I"* ggg j
2 t' n t.
)
5v=JectT-~MI'dfanT Plant Units 1 and 2 j
j Coneianers Power Company Sechtel Job 7220 34 l
Cost. Trend Report (r-5 3
a l
A9 61 hed for your information are seven copies of Cost Trend Report 6-5
%]
and the Cost Trend Register, dated July 9,1980. New trends identified by this report are:
I 6-45 through 6-73 inclusive 4
h included in these are the following trends which Bec'ntel considers resolved and are now being incorporated into the project plan.
g
-n l
6.45 Allowance for B&W/Bechtel numbering of NSSS pomponents M
(Trend report 6-4 unevaluated itea 82) 4 B
- [
6.46 Repair of cooling pond riprap 6.47MS New estimate for ESF Filtration System addition per the direction outlined in the restatement of the Forecast 6 e
C-1 Package included with BLC-9325 as list #3 ites 4/77 j-14
.o 6.48 Delete the Forecast 6 value for the load sequencer
')
per the direction outlined on list 83 ites 21 j
5
- 6. 49A& R New esttaate for the ART system addition per the id direction outlined on Serial 8652 and list 83 stees j
46 57 and 159
,3 6.50 Delete the forecast 6 value for Passive Failures j
af ter LOCA per the direction outlined on Itst 83 ite=
d 5a j
l 6.51 Modify the forecast 6 vilue for Systen Integrity for "f
Eleh Radicartive Leak itedaction Outside Containment g
y per the direction out*ined on list al items 101 and-Ine j
i
- 5
- A 4G
-a
+
CL h.
s P
= af.
w gg"' %'M~h$ ~
[
l
_e
~
~
"i
d m*
l j
0012805 1
Bechtel Power Corporation j
2 i
009499 3*27 28 2
J f
Fue 2 SII-9462 i
]
6.32A 9
Delete the forecast 6 v.lue for the Osatte Operational and Technical Support Centers per the direction out11aed 2
9 on IIst 83 f rees !!9,120 and 170 j
?;
]
kw estimate for the Onsite Technical Support Center
'b 6.528 5
per the direction outlined on list #3 f rena 119,120 and j
170 j
s 1
J 6.53AA B
- d i
l
[
kw estimate to tiparade RCS overpressure Protection Systes per the direction outlined on list 83 items j
157. ISA and 165 7g 9
6.54 j
Mded allowance for entineering Main Teedwater overf111
-}
additions per the direction outlined on list #3 ites 160 aj i
6.55 l
d Mded allowance for engineering Teodwater Ealtability i
i Assessment per the direction outlined on list 83 iten 1
(
161 M
A l
4 6.54 Mded allowance for engineering ICS FMEA Modifications
[)*
d and NN1/ICS Modifications per the direction outlined l
on list #3 itses 162,171 and 172 l
g j
6.57 Mded alicasace for engineering to Study Effects of Dew t
Qia11enges to Safety Systees per the direction outlined
_f, on list 83 itse 163
]
Estimate of engineering manhours re' quired to support 4"
a 6.58 the Training Simulator study per the direction outlined on list #3 ites 166 M
P 6-59 Mded allowance for Control Room Desitn Review per the
?.5 7
direction outlined on list 83 ites 167
-M 6.A0 Mded a!!ovence for engineerine to support the Interia
!y 5411 ability Evaluation Procas per the direction outlined y
on list e3 ites 168 M
4
. 3 6.61 Addec allowance to add In-plant P.adiation Monitorinc g
y per the direction outlined on list e3 iter 169
~4 9
g 3
6.62 Allowance for 72 NCDs from Entineering Matrix *Non Scope" t/4
[
6.63 Allowance for 9 NCDs f rom Enrineering strix " Scope c;
Non11 censing' y
n n
'it 4
p L
1-g n
l t
s t
0012806 B3chtelPowerCorporation 009499 July 15, 1980 rase s'8 i
4.66 1
Licensine non TMI-2 related* Allowance for 9 NCDs fras En 3,
a rix
- Scope 1
6.6SA 3
\\
Allowance for 2 NCtm frors Engineerina Mat i i
Licensing TMI-J Primary
- r s
- Scope 5
6 655 Licenstne TMI-2 Secondary
- Allowance for NCD 6-123 fro j
4 ng Matrix
- Scope Changes to Radvante cas Systes drain and
'k 6.66 6.67 went valves Transfer field s.all pipe group to Ann A b 6.68 r or payroll Additions to current tiidland sampling O
6.69 systes Review of Liquid Radweste System t
?
6 70 Added manhours for Large Process Pip e Hanger lastallation 4.71 Added aanhours for installation of Pi a
Plates
-g pe Restraint Cover 3
6.72 Firewatch Labor Increase q
6.73 p4 Storage TanksPost hydro Liquid Penetrant Testing of' S
]_
orated Water T
Previously identified cost trends that h ave been revised by this report 2'
86.6
)
Radweste Pu=p Seal Unit PC M-376
- 6.6A Plant coeputer replacement
- 6.M.
Reactiseter Patch Panel
- e.*
f.*f Supplier Drawir.e Resub:sittal
- =.8 Finw Ort! tees FC J-232
- a.9 Hydraulie Snubber Alternate Suppl
- r'k er 6.!"A Desten for Tornado Derressurization iv buildinc r.ot(Updated esti=ste to include all of t5
?
just the control tower).e suziliar,s o
\\
A.
fi, W R i F d B B
_,yyf s.,m'*^"
l 0012807 l
B chtalPowarCorporation July 11. 1980 ELC-9442 0098.99 Pase A
- 6.108 Desita for Tornado Depressurization 6.12 Fire Protection Destan (Increase this allowance to include transfer switches in the control room)
I I
e6.13 tarte Pipe Manner Resident Engineering Group
=
86.14 Replace Compressor b ildint
. e 6.15 Pressuriser inver S.pport (Added allowance for construction) 1 6.19 Plant Status Indication (Bechtel now considers this resolved)
- 6.20 Relocation of Hain Feedvater Crosstie Valves
- 6.21 Review of Vendor Large Pipe Hanger Design
- 6.22 Reanalysis of Main Steam Piping
- 6.23 5 31.1 Hanger Is'esetries Design Check
- 6.25 Core Drilling for Fire Protection Systes
[
- 6.26A&R Consmers Power Company Operations Trailer Fire
- 6.29A&R Miscellaneous Engineering and Other Home Office Changes
- 6.30 Permanent Plant Dewatering Mr$
86.33A Manual Startup and Unit Price startup
- g. -
("AS,.
- 6.35 Hydroten and Nitrogen Bulk Storaee Pad and Control Roo: Pressurization Tank Foundations 4%.:
- 6.36 Diemel cenerator au11 ding Concrete Block installation
- 6.37 Sulcontract Assistance for Ad=inistration Building I
- 6.38 Installation of Miscellanenus Steel for Diesel Generator Monorail i
l 86.40 Te ;orary Dewaterins Support
- h.42
'.: ster and Sewer Line to Warehouse No 2
~ %
.g e -
w 7
.g wn?=. ____ -1,.x zm.,
_Q
..e
~
L.
0012808 B0chtcl Powar Corporation July 15.1940 OO9499 mi.c-m 2 l
r-. s l
- 6.&&
- tain Strae Pipe Replacement l
. h[-
- These t rends are now resnived by f'ansurers Powe r Company.
Ref Serial MMn
<M i
ps
- Channes to these trends include updates of action statements and due by whom statements and not estimate chances or status changes.
.b$g i
p_
The following trends. which were unter.olved as of May 20 1980, remain l
unresolved as of July 9.1980. Pending further review or direction.
}
6.3 Costs for che=1 cal cleaning of the steam menerators 6.6B M1owance for relocation of the Railey 855 plant l
W computer N
p 6.7 M1owance for obtaining acceptable vendor drawings l
6.8 Increased unit costs over Forecast 6 for flow orifices
.., y 6.9 M1owance for costs over Forecast 6 for obtaining an alternate supplier for the hydraulic snubbers 6.105 M1owance for potential design changes which may result when the tornado depressurization ventina analysis is completed
-- e 6.!!
Additional costs to add travelina screens to the circu-Ic-lating water intake
. M1owance for potentisk changes to our present desian 6.12 basis for fire protection 6.18 Removal of weld backint rinas for venturts 6.20 Relocation of main feedwater crosstle valves for mode I.
operation 6.31 Process stea: line transfer valve hvpasa.
- 6. 4ll 4ter and se.er line to warehouse.No 2 l
No new unrnolved tremos have been added to the repert t'.is month.
In addition to the above status. three (3) tre nds 1. ave been identified F
which remain unevaluated for cost or schedule 1. pact due to indeterminate or unavailar!c scope. These trends are discussed on Attachment 2.
I I
erp w.a
---=~
nm u,
s g
" ~ ' '
,c x..
N g
_T.%
w c_rs *d
001280s j
Bechtel PowerCorporation 4
1 009499 m,,,.
1,.
1 n C.,4,
p Fase 6 Please advise an. If you have any questions or wish techtel to take any apertile action beyond that identified in the Coat Trend Register.
Verv ly yours,
-w 1
John A. Rotse Project Mana r 1
Jrs /*.'CJ!s 11 7/8/l Attachments (7) 1.
Cost Trend Graph for Trend Report 6-5 2.
Trends L*nevaluated for Trend Report 6-5
-M 3.
Cost Trend keport 6-5 4
Cost Trend Register 6-3, dated July 9.1980 cc:
C.S. Iteeley w/o
- .3. Miller w/a A. R..wollenkopf w/4 7'
l Response 'equested: No i
I i
1
asseg attachuert 2 0012s2o
'0094SS
- tIDI.AND PLANT In.*!TV I AND 2 BECHTEL JOB 7220 CONSLMEk3 PtWKit CretPANY TRE*.D% 1NNAt.I*ATED Fut TRF.ND REPupT M b
The followins trends have been identified which reenin unevaluat d f er whedule 1spect due to inetsterminate or unavailable scopese or cost Nondestructive Examinat ton for Cor. cavity h
I.
't Client requested additional requirements to assure AS.ME was not inspection.
Bechtel believes that this work is exceptional to the prime contract and alght hetter be handled under separate contract
'=
I f-Installed Instru=ent Inspection h
2.
m of the instrueents released for construction.The client has indic f
tando:s samplina techniques.of these instruments be inspected quarterly using +Q-sending th.at 15:
Sechtel is recour-Y 3.
Requirvee:..a ts co trly with the resource conservatisn and e
act recove ry y.
A t r u t..-
^[$
- ' tve t.s be.idopt. r* t cm
- v wi t'-
$?S tt.c -ur ect act :. rt.alnine to (Jer.t i : : at i '::.t r +;. an.? cve c.ti a; 15 1.
re.uire aa.t-a d!*r
- t s: r t. ::i!!v hi?.ord u-
~
e*:ve.
ki b t e r.
rre -
.f.
. e fl.'i t:.ad**h. 56*
2r '
..v.
h
_5t..s IM n:
_E--
_f..
9,4 ',
' b "a pc 1
J 3
' Is.
t I.
I
- 0012814,
+
t PROJECT TRENDS tiro = NO 5 laae NO.: me imaOncT i
au costs si.ooo.
c
<* w
- =im u
1a
- u T==T =
009',99 tier co c=
U_
as oss.
COST TREMD GRAPH
.eco Y
j
- -O a
r.
-f l
- Sou i
d
- 450 1
(":
400 w
- no
_h 4
e 30 b
l i
- 250 ll g) 6 i 3
~ 200
' i M
~
53 i
i i
N l
/
Imd.
l
~
l t
100
' ' i"" 7 i
i e
f
~
t t
i le
/
s
- 50 f
t
,f, j
0 9 J,f
, i l
M,5 G1.) LU
- , {
i i
i L
1.744.000 3,,,,,
i 1
i e
i (F C ho 61 g,
- r. ~
TRENDS THRU MO. * - TREND NO. 45 TOTAL TRENDS M$$
DATED'.
5/21/80 DATED: 60,
TO DATE D
2 COST TREND BASE (F/C N 8)
C l
TAENOS RESOLVED 1.784.000 t
Scop. Cheriges l
I' 1.784.000 35,510 e
14.376
'9.88^
+
Ceier C.'wiges I
3,950 t
_27.R60
)!.813 u$
sit RESOLVED CHANCES Total Urre
_ 39.46^
4 2. 2 3
i St.64^
4N
_ 82.580 g'
4.800 87.380
- face, TOTAL TRENDED 1.906,0@
ft}
-1. o x I.m.ON BB.
SCHEDULE TREND g.g UNIT ONE MAJOA MILESTONES CW""t NT l 8JNIT TWO I
pm 0JE CT ku C*eaaiGg Cw"at%7 Sc w I re-'
pat CJE CT kba-C=wWJ Sara!v ~,
i, o, 1., r....
sc =
5 -=c=-
7 ?)
1 7 FJa
- 1. o.,
,4.o..
_ina e e me ', ate! " --
17 ??
? 97 Fra I s
2 73 1
2 73a Sar Ca sa c%yi t
12 77 a 12 f r a
_Sar* Leve tw.,
~
e 73 4
73a l
i
=
e 73 8 e F3 a to Fa e to tea
)
a a
- r..
6 74 i
i e raa 6 e 7e a l
Ss*T c - Camac e,,
sva i
_ a ?)
a tsa j beer F erturu i
87 a
14:
I 14a I
e fta F w ter-213 8
12,U 1
tNa 1413 i
C--e6-7.42 e
a sa
+
754 e
4/p' i
1*53 e
s/sa
..e I
i e,,
,,w mn
_g
...c.
e, o
f s
y-V
}
.e
- w e _a a
2W W &#myaI M P siss-
--d n -mm e,
ATTACHMrt:7 a 6p
=
i 0012859 b.
..__.,t c
-;.y
., s. - e ;
~
g MBebhtel Power Corporation M
'Lp w.a:.
0lC656 IC-(A.W,
.8 A5
.c.....
D a.-d 9
e p.
y&
-M
- a..
. w.. a. s.
q g
_,,,,,eg no. s
..y 1
2*
tusiot *, 19-5/. 13
+-
e p.,
_,,g e -.
j is i
o.&
s!j q
i..,...,..n,..
19.*
.?
3et 4:: k..a *
,..774 Q,.;
J a e 6..r.. t : *.s 6 a-
.%; a
- g4*
.,,,
- j
-2.:i 1
e e
7 4tts*t: -:
- r.
J.k.
(,,., a
_3_
. tee Preside.t.
gf y]. ;
~~
at:di an,: Pr.:..!
, p C.
- N A. - 2M
.. N ' '4 ; -
l ws*ect: Midtard Plant
- 11.. a-gaF ' ?'
~'
A/
l Consimers Powe r ::::49 seentet. rot :::
Cas t Tread La rc rt t **
7 f $
a"" p-4 6 / ~.'
sd A3.***- b't
- : t v ur t rif :r-a t t e.* are seve* cortes of Cost *re =d te::rt e-*
At t a e >4 :
u l-and t*e
- st Trend testat'er, dated August 1. 19V. %ir tre-4e ide981fIcJ Ob # F*
ky.t?.is rarert are:
Jd i -- M O
~ w ^y H
, - t r
.-, ine:.. s..
M
!scluded t-tt.ese are t he !<.;* +s tr.a t re.de eAle n techt e: cs.s:ters 2
ress.;ved ard are near betr.: tr.cerrorated late'the project r* ar..
3M
').*. A&k Rettse eet teate f ar ACI st! collectior. ar.: rer va!
W *;
suste-3, *3 Lettmate f.r ;r.v!dira a *.itrosen presswr:rsts -
3-systee ti. tre ra,twaste seassifier g
e 1
Estimate of design cr.ar. des to Inst rimert a J *.: :.
'3 t.**
~
[
l surports
-Wi
- x.dtticat:.. t. '. *
- M a b i ne t loca::).
M A.
+.* 61 kev 1.e eet
.:e :.r bea4:ct Anc :.,r t.,;- ee a:e 24.
i'
. a ;..; s t :... true sta
- i Re c t4. e. tree.
-13 l 44
.- AL A.; 1<ew a nc e
..t+ ?:r 4 eswall Redesta*
k
^
- .a.
Added te.r.a*-
- ..:le ratectinn framtr.: := t*e g
l Aussitar: b.::::*a e x as m,
"e:ete Te.rs.ast - e ; reirta nanh,urs f:r se:s-::
Jeet:- cr:teria i
N 7
} '..
l 3
Y Y=-
Y YY5bY Ah2 e
-e--w--
w
l hS #hhkkWN$$$$$$ Y$ $YY Nhk 0012S60 1-3 y,
w a
~
Bechtel Power Corporation Ne-J tes W2t" r
.t. iw, n '.i:.w i n..
p p g+g.
g-3lcG3.
M,.,
.u
.u r-It
- 6. kr.
We -. e ;. e a se asnl.ar. *. e.e; I e e f.ange r g
j
.....? :. t r.e. t eIe 4-r; h
f
.e.:..... :...
..ei s.r...,-
+1
- 4. N4
- .;! : a e * *.1 w e r a ng e.. l.t a. e la c raf t emen
-F.j i
=}
Z
- . t r. ;,-
s
_=
4 6. 91. A.t,**
et 1 ; a c t t.t tin 13 > 3 *. ft l t J fuel load s
a
' + -
.c r.e :.t e m
i".
Previously ide.::::e: c:e: t rend s t h.t
- 4. ave beer. rettsed by this report
-*4 2 *'
a re :
N.
?
V
- 6.8 F.-m = rift:es FS J-232 M
y~
a
_(w
- ' e: r e.11: ar..Wr alte rnate supplier
- e.1 6.10 A Desi;r f:r Tarnado Depressurisation Au.st!!ary.
M i
L.t
- 1:*; ' inc re a se d c os t s ba se d on f i rme r sc ope k
cef rat :t)
,M s.,.
o.Il nr: *att water Intake St ruc t ure Traveling N*
kreets ' r. creased trend to re!!ect estic. ate la
,j 1:.0-5 59:
.n
_w 5-;
=
- 6.14 ke s.. a: :!. eld naching Rists for Venturis y-[
_;c 6.20
'.elst atie r. of Ma tr. Feedwat er Crs.e st ie Va:vt s f or 3.
e.
- ade. (? era:!on 2.!
~-
6.29 A4h *:.:.. ! ar.e.,ue E.n g i ne e r i ng and c.t ' e r t.o.s of f ir e
' Aede. Ir.: r.ee rins ?:Cbe less t haa 5' r ea:h)
=.w
_M_
- e.30
- e.d:- F r ;tec tion Proc edure s
- 3* ~
eM
- ai. 3 9 Af:.: -.s; 7..;re t e " eat her
- r t r. ti.e 3.
^9 e.41 4.u!*.;te b.1:dier Sna:1 Pty j
J.::e : :..;e';aneous ope r a : 1,r. e h 51.
- we r e cettted kl.$
[&.,
frt; fres:*us issue)
+
4.42
^ *er - i Jireering froe ".atris 3
W:5 i:::::. a, revis ta s and deletis9s ts ?.JDe e rartra: !? this trer.4)
M 3
--1'3 O
-t.-
,~e e.
pr g
m
__ S.9 f
- w Myy;g.
-mp; '. p#3 q q w p g y ty W P W.g 5',,;j.QQQ h Q g'k'*f, M Q{kQ,QgMQ45^.Q {-
'Y' Le7YQ1
[h
-M2h
-hs _.f _a*- ;
-N
_3_d E M.
X -*i ' " ~ - " ~
ca e._
""'~~a
~
-e
-m ww
--_w, - - - -, -
i h f-h N2 N $b k h N b-.
b b ~.,,~
s; s.:-ly=+ei n 'R'e-;:ZOi m
h_.7 bhI I
0012861 M
c-s-,
Bechtel Power Corporation 9
0 au,,,. t, I *.
O y*G h t t.
- W.
O I I. 6 3 6 iy' f
a
.'e-s 6.6) 2.'..; e % r ; l r e n o i r.,-
vs.4
= 8 9. l e. e r i r.,
t r.s. *La t r i s 2.Q 8tiel!. '.. F e e l s 8.=.. e ' '.l. l e t I *.
f.-
\\ t f *a
-~y hg
..r
. +. r.
s
- 1. t r..
f.
-g A.64
- . ' t.. e t t.- *.w= ***: 4 = I nf t
.-e r a t d f re.m M.m?S
- ".a t r : s Sivs
+.v g Ada:t t. r s, reelstuna arJ aclet te * *. tw ?.t. Je 45-j o.r:= s F : ss e i n S t.l a t re nJ)
/~h.. $.
- 4. 6.7
- t a e te r.'te ld Vall Pipe r..ul-t. Tnstneerla' QS;i
..M.t -
s
- ke....
rrt.ter h.aste and si s Pe t wer e he r f t el M *y5 dire::.:re a v. Contra.t :.fre tererecel) sW.
reA
- The se trerJs are r.e. resolved by neeStel.
W 5, g.A N 4
- Change s to the se trends include b;detes of actian statements and Joe iM by whoc stater.e.t s a.4 not estimate crianges or status chanses.
d@
The followins tre es. w.1:=. e,e re unresolved as of Ju;v 9.19F. remain A.c$
-e:x=
unresolved as of As.;.s
$~d -
rwndtrg f urts.er review or direction.
.o
- 6. 3 O
Cost s f:r c6esical cleaning of t *.e stea generators y+
6.63 4:cm4*.e. f.r re:ecat ton of a he natiev e M plant w..
}M.a cest.ter
.e.
pg 6.7
- ,'c**y5 Allowar.ce for obtainir.s acceptable verder drawings
. c
==
Clamerce f or potent la! de s san cf. antes wt ich may result 2%y*--
4.105
?
waer t4 tstnado depressuritation ver.itt.
analysis is
- 3i.2-e o?.;,. e e e y.'
cm 6 11
_ r.. g -
Additis a; costs tc, add travelins screer.s to the circu-
- f. g M.i.t.-4, latin water intake e
a_q.
6 12 M :om a r.:e far potential ca. antes 16 N.
c r tresent destan tasis f.r fire ;ro t e c t a ar.
w ?-
w 6 2r-3 4: :at:r-
.atn feedvater srce,1;..a:ves for oude 4 f.?c cr.ral: -
4.g 6.)!
Pr erse et.ar.1 e trar.s!*r velve F.:.**
l v
6.42 ma t e r a
- 3 n e we r l i r.e to warete.use W,
l
.s 74 kw t rends Lt.a s
-t-1re!.de t** t ollwt.- ite.s 1 der:1 fled as unresolved.
- @m W
O 6.hl se:wr:1 !ser:nr Arovn:....' tear :.1 es t.:s,-
\\
J 2 ss;;
1
$ ~v t
!$1:3 wA 565$8stik.!Ei4GiW 5iE M M E PR S M @ NIN>~?E' M 5 M
=GQ?M p
l
bN N M up
.7 0012862 pM.g Bechtel Power Corporation
? 74
- a....s t * : ow f e=
O 010656
.5..
...s.
h J
M e.;.... mm.
o/g~
j s.ei
. a.:.it.
r.e.
.v. : rr..c:..r. 1
+f.f g -4
?,
t'.. e t e s o.t I re r f a. vel f
- rerat ute f aangennet tes a
ti. e 4 r
'2 0l7'
- 4 a e u t ef.e e t s
In additts.e t. t'e ab. eve statue, t w. 4.' ) t r e 'd.
- 4.. heen identitled erhic h rema la, e. evaluated f or cost ser ac ted.le 1 ; e. t.! e to inJeterminate
-_- c.
e.r imavalle*;e s.. tw. These t renda are di sc.e e d
..r. At t ariment 2.
Yhd i
Flease advle, se if you have any quests..r.e
.r steh beshtrl to take any
'p f T specific actics *.=vo r.d t ta t identified l'. t**
'.et Irend begister.
Y*!
.m Mi
.er.
u you e,
.-g A
kop I.$,
v.
.ohr. A.
tutger 3.P Prtfe:t 'anas
%wn iM]
JA1/SKA/s11 8/1/'
M-1 ins O
At t ac te e *.t e ( 7 )
1.
Cost Trend Grap*: f or Tre.4 tenet 4=6 og Trerds 15 evaluated fir Tre.4 R4 port 6-4
?Q y$
3.
Cost Trend Report e-*
4 Cast Trend Register e-e, dated August 1. 1980 Yt u.-
N cc:
C.S. FJeley w e D. R. *.1 ; 1e r u. a A.R. % ;;e.'espf w/a O~j a
m.
y$
V fz$~
t$
-.t-u
- F *4 h*%h a=
-ml;p en i
~
O
=d Rssponse k wested: Ne wI
.g.
vs '
- .d m
e i
[
i
v--_
.--.-.,,.-.,-,-_-,.-,ww
,---------_,-_vmm--
h TddsbNN N M I M M I M N M E N b N Y N M5-D kj n m a63 %,
AttMbst I PRO;ECT TRENDS E~s.
na
=
MtCACT. afie.eas Unses t & 3
.~
~
tween seo g..
Joe enc r;;;
a Au. Cocrs si.Doo ou c n enw u - e w re neo.,o ao :=.wo e e em Peo.ect f orecast W
..k..,
To T,
- i to oss.
COST TREND ORAPM q
e00 1
]
I
-e 2
640
- - + - --
~~-
~
g
- 7, j
~~_
,,,.M
..~
s l
~d 400 I
~d
.W M I
- -+- h,'
!. '1
'"a 450 vn y,
_t e
e,
i.
- i
+
.c,v5
- 00 f
j
,(([
360 300
%NN.
I i i
, e.
i ;
- , t s
4
.2
-260 s-s.
e
...G i
--8.
D 200 l
g
^
~'
ISO i
i
/ ':"u i
100
' ' * *.e
~
f wum r.:f 1
J f :-
/Tr',1 ' ~ -
SC O
a sc e e e r e e is et isi e's a e a e r e o to si is i as 1i 1.784.000 N
'.E3 FC aos S) l TmDdDS THRU 100. '-?
lTapsD 180.6 '
TOTAL T2006 SATED.
9 8*
DATED'. A '
6G TO DAT1
3.
COST Thee SAst FC see. si 1.Fs4.see 1.Fs4 Joe FJ "I
S Tapes MacLvtD Scumos chmges 49.4C f.385 56.265
- $2' Ceter Crusges
,,,,,, y., 5 -
t : 3, t, P,
!,;st
',y B;.* t-
+-
(
WT MSCLytn Cw?s r1* ?*? __
6-A
- 5
.g Yeas m 47.360 M*'9'-
9'.290 l
TOTAL TN 1,;33.**-
+?L3??i
- ,923,715 yl, l
l SCHEDULE TREND -
..~e
-Uns.t Dest UntT Tiro
- ~
"one' l emon c' v -
- 3 h
Y, pas.
N T eac
- v. O, 1 % Y, y
,----m
- 3 77 i
sum.m suc pec, e, m iy *3 a
-h 3a,= C,pucessi e ')
t e F3 e v.
i m u, a.,
e e 's 9 'e 8
@ e.e m.mese s,.,
e ve 244 l
m
==
i e 2.9 3
?M fp pas-
? aba i
eans j jy' l
WW l
>=
I D'l lif'It t
- 9
l'W 7
G ee.s M.4t:
I y[g 4 yy%.' w.:5W,.pMMW M.MMWE'M.-4ys;'&;M@%%g.WG[???${4MG.S$
w 93 *'Y 4 M d h W M 5 1 9 t d $ n.3 % g'E W G f "-
M-
-M f
$$g- -g{.3 w
~ ~ ~
a
[.TT,*.C"!'E!:T 5 Bechtel Power Corporation i 3 z, 4 b.
777 East Eisenhower Parkwsy annardor.uicniosn asen Asmus P.O. Box 1000, Ann Arbor, MicNgan 48106 April 27,1983 0002800 BLC-16632 Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, M1 49201 Attention: Mr. A.R. Hollenkopf Schedule / Cost Manager Midland Project
Subject:
Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Consumers Power Company Bechtel Job 7220 COST TREh'D REPORT 7A-16
(
A copy of Cost Trend Report 7A-16 is attached for your information.
This is the closing trend report for Forecast 7R, the Project Replanning Forecast. The cost trend base will be adjusted next month to the Forecast 7R total of $2,402,000,000.
New and revised trends identified by this report are 7.34B, 7.41P, 7.63C, 7.77B, 7.139B, 7.143B, and 7.169 through 7.187 inclusive. The l
cost trend graph (Attachment 1) displays the history of cost trends to the trend base of $1,975,000,000.
In addition to the trends included in the register, 4 trends have been identified that remain unevaluated for cost or schedule because of indeterminate or unavailable scope. These trends are base project items and are discussed in Attachment 2.
l
T-Beci..al Power Corporation
~
BLC-16632 April 27,1983 0003801 l,3246 PaSe 2 i
Please advise me if you have any questions or wish Bechtel to take specific action beyond that identified in the Cost Trend Report.
Very truly yours, 1
\\
Jain Projaet Cost / Schedule Supervisor SKJ/JSF/vmk 111602/IV Attachments: 1.
Cost Trend Graph for Trend Report 7A-16 2.
Trends Unevaluated as of Trend Report 7A-16 3.
Cost Trend Report 7A-16 cc: J.W. Cook w/a D.B. Miller w/a A.R. Mollenkopf v/12 J.A. Mooney v/a t
Written Response Requested: Yes
'H0 JECT TRENDS I
BASE PROJECT, SEPARATE FACILITIES, AND SOILS ITEMS TREND N3.: 7A.16 JOB N3.: 7220 PROJECT: Cidlaid Units 1 & 2 l
Cost denot:s order.cf.maGrutude 1i324.,% T,,no, 0003802
- - -TOTAL to Ont.
COST TREND GRAPH $1.000,000 RESOLVED
-800 I
I 560 I
450 lW 400 ll
/
/
l l
85o lt
)
300 w
a I
/
250
}
J I4
'l 200 i
l I
//
~
l M
150 I
y I
100 l
. -4 i
/
g A
i
/
0
/ I
- I i
4 11 121/822 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11121/83 2 3 4 5 6 7 89 to 11 121/B4 1,975,000 J TRENDS THRU NO.7A-1LTREND NO.7A-16 TOTAL TRENDS 8 1,000 DATED: 3/22/83 DATED: 4/22/83 TO DATE i
COST TREND 8ASE 1,975,000 1,975,000 i
TRENDS RESOLVED j
Scope Changes 92,664 57,100 149,764 l
l Other Changes 208,540 68,696 277,236 SIT RESOLVED CHANGES 301'400 204
)
427,000 k25,79679,400) 0 i'
Tota! Unresolved 79 TOTAL TRENDED 2,355,604 46.396 2,402,000 SCHEDULE TREND UNIT ONE UNIT TWO CAJOR MILESTONES CHANGE CHANGE b
T W Bus (m monms)
(m monms)
Nb to Date Ttus Treno N
To Oste Trus Trene Start Engmeem-2/73 2/73 Inese N8tC (AEC) Pemut 12172 12/72 Stam Constructe 6'73 8/73
..Stad Lmer Piste 10/74 6/74 Set menetor 6'78 6178 Set Turtune Cesing 4/79 9/78 Hoe runctens:
s/s3 7/8[.
1/83 5/84 Fuel tose 12/83 2/L 7/83 10/84 Comme cw operaten 7/s4 8'85 12/s3 2/85 oises DATE l PAGE OF
-s
- ~ -
-w-m
[
ATTAC""ENT G Bechtel Power Corporation 034400 i
777 East Eisenhower Parkway Ann Arbor, Michigan wamen P.O. Box 1000. Ann Arbor, M chigan 48106 l
June 25, 1981 BLC-11057 Cc./'
- k. b 4 p[3
_ n i *>o. I Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road
. t <M- (. -
><.u.- $
Jackson, Michigan 49201 g,g Attention: Mr. J.W. Cook
'D-
~
g-D Vice President Projects, Engineering and Construction N ",._
Subject:
Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Consumers Power Company Bechtel Job 7220 Meeting Notes No. 1374 The notes of the June 10, 1981, project management meeting are attached.
The following dates have been reserved for meetings for the next 4 months.
July 9, 1981 August 27, 1981 (Executive Review, Midland Jobsite)*
September 10, 1981 October 15, 1981 Please call if you have any questions.
O Preparation meetings to be announced.
Very uly yours, John A. Rut rs JAR /MB/bjm Project ger 6/4/10L
Attachment:
Meeting Notes No. 1574 cc:
D.P. Judd (B&W w/s)
K.R. Eline w/a E
JUN 301981 ACEANDP.90 JECT Written Response Requested: No MANAEiMENT 4
Bechtel Power Corporation 034400 777 East Eisenhower Parkway Ann Arbor, Michigan
- destAsens P.O. Box 1000, Ann Ardor, Michigan 48106 MEETING NOTES NO. 1374 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY BECHTEL JOB 7220 DATE:
June 10, 1981 PLACE:
Midland Jobsite
SUBJECT:
Midland Project Management Meeting ATTENDEES:
Bechtel Consumers Power Company Babcock & Wilcox M.N. Bakarich R. C. Bauman D.P. Judd R.M. Collins W.R. Bird A.B. Lazar L.E. Curtis J.W. Cook L.E. Davis D. Johnson M.A. Dietrich K.R. Kline L.A. Dreisbach R. McCue E.M. Hughes D.B. Miller S.K. Jain A.R. Hollenkopf J. Milandin D. Ronk W.H. Nielson C. Slade J.A. Rutgers T.J. Sullivan ITEMS DISCUSSED:
A.
Introduction of New Personnel J.A. Rutgers introduced D.F. Judd, and A.B. Lazar, Babcock & Wilcox's l
Midland Senior Project Manager and Manager, Nuclear Steam System l
Product Line, respectively.
D.B. Miller introduced Jerry Slade, Consumers Power Company's Assistant Site Superintendent.
J.A. Butgers reminded all present that the purpose of the meetings is to faci-litate communications, exchange ideas freely, and provide a decision-making forum.
l e, _,,,, _.. _..
,,-,.-._m y
..e_,. _,,.. _..
...e
-_,,,,.,..,,_...._,,,_.,,..,--...__.__,_,__.-,m.w
Bechtel Power Corporation Me2 ting Notoo N3. 1374
)
000 " U 034400 B.
Action Item Review J.A. Rutgers reviewed the status of action items from previous meetings. During the discussion of these items, the following observations and additional actions were assigned.
Item 61 - EVAC Anchorages:
L.A. Dreisbach reported that the num-bar of drop-in anchors to be replaced is 600 rather than the 400 indicated on the Action Item Status Sheet.
J.W. Cook asked if there are any other areas in the plant whgre bolts are a problem.
L.E. Dreisbach informed him that there are several other problem areas, but programs are in place addressing them.
J.W. Cook en-phasized that he wanted to ensure there are no hidden areas that might surprise us later.
Item 65 - DCAR Procedure:
J.W. Cook asked who would be involved in
~
decision-making in processing DCARs. He was informed Chat if the change proposed by the DCAR has a schedule impact, both he and l
J.A. Rutgers will have final approval.
J. Milandin indicated he would have a working meeting on the proposed procedure before its publication on or about. June 19, 1981, to ensure all parties under-l stand and agree to it.
Item 78 - Reactor Upper Laterel Supports:
R.C. Bauman asked for a i
date on which fira design criteria would be established.
J.A. Rutgers indicated he would provide it, but must first receive interface criteria from B&W.
D.F. Judd said he would take as an action item the requirement to provide the information.
Item 92 - Recycle Through Long Lead Time Items: Eleven issues are planned for field review in June. The major issue then remaining for field review is MLLA 6, Fire Protection.
S.K. Jain will coor-dinate the effort.
Item 110 - Associate Systems with Blockwall Replacement / Modifications and Incorporate a Long Lead Time Item Scheduling:
S.K. Jain
~
indicated he will accomplish the requirement based on a sample of 20 blockwalls. He will provide an update at the next meeting.
I Item 119 - Installation Recovery Schedule for Small Pipe P:aparation of the recovery schedule has been delayed because of the diversion of resources to review calculations in the small pipe area.
l Item 125 - Statement of Bechtel's Basis for Baving No Safety Concerns on Design for Soils Modulus of Elasticity (E): Consumers Power Company will study Bechtel's state ~aent (BLC-10960). The ites will l
remain on the Action Item Status List fer an additional month.
l l
l
Bechtel Po'wer Corporation Meeting Notes No. 1374 Og45y Page 3 v.
~.
034400 Item 126 - Review Procedures for Determining Workarounds: This item is to be deleted from the Action Item Status List because it relates to Item 129.
Item 127 - Review Task Force Program for MLLA Issues: A Sechtel letter indicating task force membership is being prepared.
Task force implementation to resolve initial schedule paths still needs to be agreed upon.
Item 130 - Painting Steel in Containment:
D.M. Hiller said he is still reviewing input from interested parties and is looking at various options.
J.W. Cook reminded the group that at the last meeting he had asked for an engineering recommendation from Bechtel.
L.H. Curtis advised him that T.J. Murphy is working closely with D.M. Miller and is providing the technical input.
ACTION STATEMENT:
Provide Bechtel interface criteria on the reactor vessel ACTION ASSIGNMENT:
D.F. Judd B.
Schedule / Cost S.K. Jain presented the schedule status for engineering and construction.
He noted engineering. design, and construction are 70, 81, and 68%
complete, respectively, for a composite completion of 68%.
He reported that the cash flow for May 1981 was $19.4 million, and the total for the year to date was $83 million, $6.7 million under the amount forecast. He noted that the underrun had dropped by about $2 million from the previous month; he attributed this to quicker deliveries.
~
L.R. Curtis advised the group that he is looking into developing a more precise method for estimating design and engineering percent complete.
D.B. Miller voiced a general concern that the intermediate project
~
schedules are not being coordinated fully.
J.A. Rutgers replied that the intermediate schedules reflect early forecasts and that the alternative would be to wait until a comprehensive package is assembled, fully coordinated, and issued.
J.W. Cook indicated i
he is not ready to eliminate early forecasts, but asked, if prac-l ticable, they be better coordinated. Bechtel will conduct internal team coordination of schedule data to be presented at project management meetings prior to future meetings.
l l
l
Bechtel Power Corporation Mesting Notco No. 1374 Page 4 0004522 034400 During the discussion on small pipe hangers, P. Corcoran apprised the group that resident engineering is into the third week of the recov-ery effort on stress calculations. They had reviewed 9% of the geismic Category I calculations and had discovered one signi-ficant discrepancy. Be defined a significant discrepancy as one in which stress exceeds code allowables. Be further indicated that approximately 47 people were doing the review, and that the diver-sion of resources to this task was having an adverse affect on design production.
F. Young informed the group of the recovery plan for the design of small pipe hangers. He presented production and schedule figures for March, April, and May, and noted part of the shortfall between the two was caused by more accurate bookkeeping and issuing han-gers and isometries as a unit. He described a recovery plan limited by two items: First, it is not practicable to reduce the lead time between engineering and installation. Second, it is difficult to obtain manpower to do the job. He presented a recov-ery plan with the production of an upper limit of 575 hangers per month and a lower limit of 385. He cautioned, however, that to achieve the upper limit he would require 30 additional people. He indicated that either the upper or the lower limit would have the total plant back on schedule, but neither would achieve recovery during the current project schedule in the containments.
J.W. Cook asked if there are any reasons why we should not get the extra people.
L.E. Curtis stated he would look into the matter.
J.W. Cook asked if the new subcontract design team for large pipe hangers is in place and working.
E.M. Hughes replied that a small cadre for the team was at the jobsite, but the team is not fully functional at this time.
In response to a question from J.A. Rutgers, 3.K. Jain stated that the status of instrumentation tubing would be presented at the July meeting.
J.W. Cook asked how many packages have been issued to Zack.
L.B. Curtis informed him one had been issued and two remained to be issued.
J.A. Rutgers reminded L.B. Curtis to coordinate space requirements with L.E. Davis and D.B. Miller for the personnel who are to perform HELEA and deflection barrier analysis.
L.B. Curtis and D.B. Miller stated that the coordination is being accomplished.
~~
~
~~'
Bechtel Power Corporation Nesting Notds No. 1374 Page 5 0004523 034400 C.
Manpower / Staffing 1.
Engineering L.B. Curtis reported the equivalent engineering marpower had increased from 835 at the and of April to 842 at the end of khy. Be indicated the figure would continue to climb, with the estimated peak above 1,000, having increased by 50 over the past month. Be added that the increase takes into account the recent BELBA technical services agreement and additional engineers required in control systems and plant design.
2.
Construction L.E. Davis reported construction manpower as follows:
June 8 Second Quarter Third Quarter Manuel First shift 1,600 Second shift 498 Total 2,098 2,130 2,170 Pipefitters First shift 590 i
Second shift 221 l
Total 811 850 870 Electricians First shift 530 Second shift 172 Total 702 700 700 l
l Nonaanual First shift 515 Second shift 79 Total 5 84 620 700 Coastock 100 100 100 j
=
.y
,--ww-
,-m-e n-*
+- - - - -
-e w-
")ww w
-m P
Bechtel Power Corporation
"* 12"8 * *"
- 2
- oce43:n 034400 D.
Quality Control J.W. Cook briefly reviewed the results of the May MRC audit. Be thanked Bechtel and Consumers Power Company personnel for their responsiveness to the NRC team's requests and indicated be is pleased with the results of the audit, which showed the Midland Quality Assurance program is adequate and working.
Using the NRC sctivity and open action items charts, W.R. Bird apprised the group of the status of quality assurance activities.
He noted a significant increase in the average points on the NRC activity chart, and explained the increase was caused by points accrued by an audit of the electrical discipline and the NRC audit of the plant in May. He seconded J.W. Cook's laudatory remarks about the team effort to get as many items resolved as practicable while the NRC members were present. While discussing the summary of open action items chart, he pointed out that the MPQAD had achieved onc of its goals: to reduce the number of open action items for which it is responsible to below 100 (nov 97).
W.R. Bird also reported that the MAC assessment of the Midland project QA program had been published and distributed. He indi-cated the report concludes that the Midland QA program neets NRC requirements and is adequate; however, response time for corrective actions is excessive.
W.R. Bird also mentioned that the report l
describes the Midland QA program as "somewhat above average" for a nuclear plant.
J.A. Rutgers emphasized the great effort being expended for responsiveness to QA items, and en-ouraged the team members to ensure that inspectors / auditors are made aware of this responsiveness.
2 M.A. Dietrich informed the group'of the results of an SDDR audit.
He indicated that 200 of 2,000 SDDhg were checked and that the l
completion of action ref.'.ected in the SDDRs had not been verified i
in all cases. He said the following program is necessary to correct the findings:
i 1)
Review all SDDRs to ensure that required action has been taken; follow up for those cases in which the records indicate action is not complete 2)
Review procedures and revise them as required tu ensure they provide for ongoing checks of action required by SDDRs
(
M.A. Dietrich further indicated that the report on the SDDR audit would be issued that week.
1,.E. Davis asked if the audit findings could also apply to hardware already installed. He was informed that they could.
1
-., _ _. _ ~ -..._
Bachtal Power Corporation Meeting Notes No. 1374 034400 Page 7 0004525 E.
Licensins and Safety 1
T.J. Sullivan informed the group that the size of the FSAR amendment i
for June was significantly reduced from that originally espected. In addition, Chapter 7 commitments were completed, but only 60% of the i
SCNs were approved. He reminded the group that last month he had indicated LOLA items would soon be computarized. He stated that the items were now on the computer, and he needed Bechtel and B&W personnel to attend meetings to work out requirements for disci-plines, determine priorities, and give visibility to important items. He indicated he had met with the Reactor Systems and Accident Analysis Branch of the NRC, but the Control Systems Branch j
wat1d not be able to review the FSAR until September. He cautioned that the Control Systems Brar.ch, because of its late start, may compress the review schedule to an intensive I week effort, and hold the review in the hechtel Ann Arbor office.. He further indicated
}
that the Health Physics Branch is reviewing Chapter 12 and is expressing some concern about the post-accident shielding review.
Other reviews, he reported, are pointing toward a November SER input. He apprised the group that the Midland plant is sixth in line for 1983 licensing, and noted that such activity in the rule change area could shorten the licensing process,.
J.A. Rutt,ars cautioned that the NRC will use the project's proposed 11cenair4 schedule, and reminded the group that it is a project responsi-bility to adhere to it.
F.
Calculation to Support Larse Pipe i
E.M. Hughes informed the group that Bechtel is reviewing its calcu-lations in support of large pipe hangers. He indicated that Bechtel is looking at two areas: 1) whether there are isometrics that I
have been issued for fabrication for which committed preliminary calculations do not exist, and 2) whether piping isometric supporting calculations are ce=plete in accordance with applicable EDPs.
L.H. Curtis indicated the EDP on calculations is not as specific as it should be and thus would be revised. When told that the probles with calculations in the large pipe area appeared to be insignificant, J.W. Cook asked if that determination is judgmental.
E.M. Eughes apprised him that currently it is.
G.
Lont Lead Time Items Scoreboard and Critical Path Activities of Most Nesative Issues A.R. Mollenkopf provided a schedule analysis of critical schedule items. He then reviewed the critical path of the four most negative issues. A general discussion followed his presentation in which the efficacy of the MLLA long lead time item acoreboard/
Project /2 program was questioned. Specific questions raised were:
0004526 Bechtel Power Corporation Meeting Notes No. 1374 Page 3 034i00
- 1) Bow do tasks identified in Project /2 set into the appropriate schedule, 2) What effect does Project /2 have on completing systems and setting them turned over, 3) should Project /2 be subordinated to the completion working group, and 4) If Project /2 were under the systes working group, would its many requiremen:s render the group ineffective 1 J.W. Cook asked that J.A. Butgers and he be given an actiod item to review the MLLA and Project /2 program to ensure that sufficient mangement direction and emphasis necessary to achieve schedule impact resolution are being given to the effort.
ACTION SIATEKENT:
Review Project /2 to ensure that sufficient management direction and emphasis to achieve schedule impact resolution are being given to the prpgram.
ACTION ASSIGNMENT:
J.W. Cook, J.A. Rutgers H.
Proximity Criteria E.M. Hughes apprised the group of the history of the proximity issue on the Midland jobsite. He indicated that the criteria were established to satisfy an NRC inspection concern regarding poten-tial physical interaction of elements of systems necessary for shutdown in the event of an earthquake. Be said that under current plans, adequacy of physical separation is to be checked by area walkdowns. He discussed three options in light of renewed inter-1 est in the proximity issues 1) continue as we are currently with emphasis on the finrJ walkdown to check seriestion, 2) make guide-lines mandatory now and verify that everything already installed meets separation criteria, and 3) review and eliminate the requitement.
E.M Eughes further indicated that proximity criteria had been made mandatory for Zack, and construction had issued cards advising the crafts of the requirement for minimum physical separation distances l
for installation in Class 1 areas.
E.M. Eughes concluded his discussion by presenting the recommen-dations of a joint Bechtel/ Consumers Power Company task group that had set on the issue. The recommendations constitute a plan of action for the short run; a final decision may well be based on the results of the short run plan.
i
0004527 Bechtel Power Corporation Heating Not0e No.1374 Page 9 034l010 Co=plete a sin 2e draft specification combini== all ero=-
i imity requirements (potentially available in a month) 2)
Organise a team to conduct a review of a 11afted number of essentially completed areas to identify prozinity violations.
Then conduct engineering evaluations to determine the number 4
of physical changes required. F.atrapolate the results of the review to other areas.
3) obtain within 2 months a project management decision on whether to make the existing guidelines mandatory and when a walkdown program should be instituted.
The project decision was to continue the status que on installa-tions, but to proceed with the taak group's recommendations.
J.W. Cook also asked that quality control personnel be involved with the development of the specification, so that they may simul-teneously work on a draf t inspection plan.
1.
System Completion Status Referring to the five key elements for 9ystes completion which he had presented at the last team meeting, J. Milandin provided an update of each item. Of special note he emphasised that Management Systems Agreement 1, a system for hardware system configuration control, had been approved by both Bechtel and Consumers Power Company and would be published by June 19, 1981. He presented the progress of systems turnover since May, as indicated below:
Status 5/81 6 /81 Turned over to startup 140 142 to date (cumulative)
Scheduled for turnover 195 195 6/1/-12/31/81 (Rev 11 CPS)
Scheduled for turnover 403 403 in 1982 (Rev 11 CPS)
Scheduled for turnover 62 62 in 1983 (Rev 11, CPS)
Scheduled for turcover 6/81 N/A 17 Submitted for acceptance (to date) 6/81 N/A 8
Cumulative forward pass reviews 159 231 by engineering Cumulative forward pass review 27 36 by completion working group
B3chtel Powar Corporat, ion Meeting Natts No. 1374 00>.452S Page 10 D34400 D 5 "222*r==k'd 8' *=raa'ar af 9-25=ted =7at*=====2d = tart-J. Milandin replied turnover of Q-systems would start when pro-cedures are in place for configuration control. Be expected turnover of Q-listed systems to begin shortly after he published the procedure on configuration control on June 19, 1981.
J. Milandin indicated that the goal of the completion working group is to get 9 months ahead of turnover for the forward pass review.
Be also described the forward pass review by engineering as a design status review of the remaining work.
J.
Proposed Format for Presenting System Completion Status 4
A.K. Jain presented the format below as a proposed vehicle for presenting system completion status at management team meetings.
1)
System turncver progress 2)
System construction completion progress 3)
System design level review progress 4)
Completion working group activities 5)
System turnover schedule analysis Following a gereral discussion of his proposal. A.J. Boos asked l
those present to submit any recommendations for change to S.K. Jain. He also asked S.K. Jain and A.R. Hollenkopf to work together on the format and to initista its use during the August team meeting.
ACTION STATD2hT:
Develop, by August 13, 1981, a format for presenting system completion status ACTION ASSIGNMEh7:
5.K. Jain, A.R. Mollenkopf K.
Coordination of Design Changes with Operating Plant Procedures R.C. Bauman informed the group that three procedures are required for plant operations: test, operating, and maintenance procedures.
l Be voiced concern that key, up-to-date information, otherwise available, is not being included in these procedures. Be gave examples of areas of concern which included cycle limits, system pressures, vibration assumptions, and temperatures.
Bochtel Power Corporation Mesting Natos Ns. 1374 P:gn 11 00045PS 0 3 4 4 0 4.. M111er,entioned that Westin, house has a,anua111 sting a11 points of concern regarding the NSSS system. The title of the manual, as he recalled, is Cautions, Limitations, and Setpoints.
He thought the Midland project might need a similar manual and he asked N W representatives if they had one.
D.F. Judd replied N W had test and operating specifications.
J.W. Cook asked R.C. Bauman and G. Slade to identify for Bechtel engineering the areas of concern.
R.C. Bauman asked D.F. Judd how B&W intended to incorporate field i
change authorizations (FCAs) into its manuals.
D.F. Judd replied that the FCAs would interface with Dechtel's field change i
packages (FCPs).
~
J.W. Cook advised the group that Consumers Power Company is inquir-ing if all vendor manuals must have current drawings. He indicated he would resolve the matter with Bechtel after first obtaining an in-house position.
ACTION STATEMINT:
Identify the areas of concern in operating plant procedures ACTION ASSIGh* INT:
R.C. Bauman, G. Slade L.
Rework Control L.E. Davis advised the group of the following schedule for publishing administrative procedures to control rework:
Issue Procedure Date
~
Guidelines for raceway and 6/19 cable Control systems 6/22 Small pipe hangers 6/15 Large pipe hangers 6/15 Civil 6/26 Be further indicated that quality control is also working on rework procedures and should have them ready for issuance I week following the publication of the administrative procedures.
i I
l i
Bechtel Power Corporation Meeti:3 Notca No. 1374 Page 12 0004530 0 3 4 4 enatr-Dar "*ci=5a= T*bi*
Due to lack of time, A.R. Mollenkopf did not review the 90-day decision table with the team members. Instead, he referred them to the table he had updated and distributed earlier, and asked for comments.
N.
Adjourneent The meeting adjourned at 3 p.m.; the members to meet again at the call of the chairman.
6/12/15 S
e a
S S
e
\\
l
ATTP C'!?'E!:T 7
'50020 0
Bechtel Power Corporation 777 East E senhower Parkway Ann Aroor, Micnigan j
asew Assess P O Bos 1000. Ann a"act Mic%gan 481C4 November 23, 1981 0u43 4 BLC-11891 CC'. 8 Consumers Power Company LN 1945 West Parnall Road D
Jackson, Michigan 49201 Attention: Mr. J.W. Cook
(
Vice President Projects, Engineering and Construction
Subject:
Mid*and Plant Units 1 and 2 Censumets Power Company Bechtel Job 7220 November Critical Items Action Raport Attached for your information is the November issue of the Critical Items Action Raport.
Very truly yours,
/
(*Joh
. Rutgers Pro ect Manager JAR /DJF/ksc 11/20/2s Attachments:
1.
Critical Itens Action Report 2.
Current Schedule Analysis cc:
D.B. Miller v/a l
l l
l t
l l
Written Response Re. quested: No l
u
9 6'oo.:2d 5729 NOVEMBER 1981 MIDLAND PI. ANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT (SYSTEMS SECTION) e 0
5?30 CRITICAL ITEMS AC','l0N REPORT Table of Contents - Systems Section Description System Page 2ADC 2
Main Condensers and Internals 2APA 3
Condensate. Storage 1&2BBA-1 5
Refueling Canal Bead. Vessel. Internals 2BBC 2
Reactor Coolant Pumps Raaetor Coolant Pumps and Auxiliaria's 2BBC 8
2BCA 8
Decay Heat Removal 2 BRA 6
Core Flood Systes Primary Vater Storage and Transfer OBLA 4
ODAA 7
Circulating Water Supply f
OEAA Service Water Supply l
1&2EAD 5
Auxiliary Building Service Water 2ECB 2
Refueling Canal and Transfer Tube 2EGA 2
CCV System l
1&2ECA 6
CCW System ORGB 3
Perimeter Intrusion Detection System Plant Access and Monitoring Security System ORCC 1
ORGD 3
Security System Consoles and Computers 2RJA 6
Plant Computer 2SAA 1
ECOAS System 1&2SCA 6
NNI Instrumentation OSOB 7
Hazardous Cas Monitoring System System OECA is not covered in Critical Items Action Report but Note:
As being reviewed by Completion Working Group.
5$FKeyStartupSysta=s k
21/20/1 g
p,-~r v
f ST5f tat.1
- 't *Sa 8 - Harm _,-
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT wunoturs t end 2
_t_ o, _3_
Jo m 3 r220 esseserAees.
- P SOGE94EE SYSTEGI IIAPACT ACTIDIO m
pw IttGA900.
DESCHIPTIOtt CtNIIRE0ff 57Aftf3 tweebel ACTIO01 IEGIIEIES p Estese4 0t w
2SAA ECCAS SY57tM -
T/012/05/88g I (5/808 Gire flood ap stem blat ehlee flee f abricettaa and shipping of tic
-18
- s. (5fSI) Fabricate and ship 3 618 08/27/04 05/2A/82 bistables forma the critical path hIstablee 05/28/82F for thle lesser.
eMJC PLANT ACESS AffD h001lTretMC T/0 09/01/81 SiftmlTT f.TSTtM
-14
- e. (a/el) Egeotte delivery
_ Free l (a/el) of st eelle end pree'eure leeC reelstent doore ( AA0 F.O.)
(RwS see. A-30007) wr poore A-17e (weeley) tif doore F-48910 (teooley) 10/01 12/01 06/92F Destga calcular$one returned Code 4 I
on 11/17/88, to be resubmitted 11/23/01. All esterial le to be avellette hr 12/31/01. Doore 4,
- 20. and 28 are to be ehtpred 3/26/82, and doore 79. 82, 813, and Pl4 will be sistyped 5/7/82.
Doore 130, 137, 16r, and 184 are to be shipped 6/4/02.
Iff Onora A-12-A (stock)
WT doore F-46366 (Meck) 12/01 02/82 07/82F e
A meeting is scheduled for 11/21/81 with Hock to diarmee delivery requiremente and review preliminary drawings. Drawings and calculat too are to be endiet tteel slee week of II/)D/Al. t}A manuel returned Code 3 on 10/11/81.
AT Doore A-8-A (Overly)
Af doore F-45440 (overly) 10/el 12/91 02/82F Drentase and calculations returned ca. lee 2 and 3 on 11/12/01'. Meterlet
]
leal t Ise is 6 to 8 weets. Delive ry.
to acleeduled for 1/29/02.
Minelle end Pressure Realetent Miselle sad preneure later 12/03 Dno t e A-66 ( Ove r l y) reelstant sloore (Overly 04 % R2F A-66) g)
Tleese doors are In the ble steges.
Q Tentative delivery was elisoted me 82 tes 14 wecke ARAD.
rraeste sate ves A
Itev St.es t s*P Synt ows
on ok 1
~2 2
0 3,!
1 RR R"R se
==
e t
ce g_d, j-ss ss :-
Es
==
4 ss
~~
ss
~~
_s 5,-pg as as ss ss s=
s.s
,s ss
_=
- s a
I 2
=
a
=
=
s s
9 ~+ l 2
3 3
3 di e
e c
e 2
s s
s a
a a
s W W EX 2
y s
lii 2 1 53: 4 9!6:
Bla Eig E5:
,i 6 8
2 2
5 I:
=,!
)
r
, =
ors 3
e in
- s tima
.j..a w
22:
1 2.i. 3.
2.i_s
.= E 1
.s 3_. :
- 4
- 3s 4 8=a I
.i.
- i. v.
1.-
- _s:s
- i j:
se
--:g:
=
!_:a3 r
__3,2 a
=
a g-e ; eg e.y:
22,== =,_
si 2 _:,
g i
~:
aty gI
- e.
=i.
e-
- 4: :::::
=
c:
o g
- -:sa a
i J
J J
J 4
4 4
W E
w i
2
$~*
2 s
If
_JI O
2 o
d
$_ 4 I
f 5:m
- i. j
$_.t m.
y,2 acw e-I!
I 2 2:-!
i.1 t
~:
a s i:
=
_o a
- a :
m.: -
4m 2
2 2:
g,...
-.-e 2.,
=
E I
i i.
- I
- 1 i'!! !
.! m o
o i
y A
E 2' 2 : : *::
4,-
i 12
^2 28.t5 22*
- _ = la
- im, s
s es!
it. -, 2 5.g" 2.; 4 t3:
4 2
21 D E-D s
y n
v 5
=;
g s
t g
=
=
s i.
a v
T I
3 i
N 5
=
8 m3 E
E
=
t c
g
.3 8
g j
g y
I il
! j 6
8 j
j l
s:
4
=
2 c m m
e a
1 a
s e a
m
~
E~
s a
a a
I 5
E @'
!g
(
Ga R
O 2
2
==
0 0
i O
M O
O E
g_
,q x
g 1
g 3
F r
3 A
F
,g 21 22 22 1 1 1I 1l 88 s0 08 08 pt 0S 0e 6
//
//
//
// //
//
/l 30 1
1 8 55 00 66 66 1l e.
02 00 18 33 22 10 0O
.g p
50 l l 44 00 23
//
//
//
// //
//
//
,NQyg 0I 22 AP 01 OO 00 1 3 00 F
1I 18 C_
r
((
u m%
O 1
8 1
1 2
s 8
8 8
0 0
" 1_
e#
/
/
/
/
/
e h
5 8
1 3
2 r
r I
0 0
0 0
1 e
e ey
/
/
/
/
/
t t
6 6
2 3
1 a
a 0
0 1
1 0
L l
T E
'E
H 8
8
'8 0
r c r c rW c
c c
r h r c 1 f gee e eE o
o c o C
a c a eE fo al s
C ZEW EW l
e I
r l
r n
rl a l P P e p W E AD E
EE u
p e
A 4
uy f.
)
t a t e
3 C
eei v
s y
4 A
t l r e
s t
0 W
C oeu R
en ee.
t h
p W
/
p c
t n e.
ed t
A l e
.)
E aoe dt t nS e h
y h
eas t2 p
e it l nil daWt e
t p
eg r n s4 e
rt a
O n
S i
e nu eie i0 pes n
a2(P d
l S
aoy l f r l0 t W ee.)
0 M
n i
f rl a i 4
e reS rl eD e0)A e
c h
- hh t t t -
e e
ats 0 r50 a
c ytS ecn eA se dq.
pc 7
uA5. e f
e o
t ie t
n 2
eeT4 cC - 7 t
t l
J5) ap o.
e m
er3 rnB 0 oOA5 a
S n 30 d er pt g
an V o.
P nA1 r
(0 c
P e 13 pd o I
a h
f o(
Pe 0
i O m 9
61 U
f o
l M
)
s
) c e3 4 r
e 1 p Sv-o nS t
s I wI )
l se
)l 0-b
) r 3i I vv
) t em aU u
T t
s S e 1
eeeI 1 e0A a
1 u
- h e (O v 8
t e l B o
s if9
/nl 0 eS r
8 c 8 S O
I 6
O 8 t at A(
t R
p I
I vf 3 I ebS
/nA.
/o
/ot s T
I eA1 I oaW 8 oC e
)
t r
)
)
8l oy
)
)
O C
( r(5 (t cB
( col I
( p 1
2 (I ps 1
2 I
A P
e 6
e e
b ER E
l -
itTe al l
N 0Ae Lt ia t
2 4
0 t c 0
0 EPe 2
3 2
ni 1
2 O
Hsw et e
I Cl t
ti T
S or PC C
s f
hsA
)
n n
d n
o o i n
o E
dy-m it eu id e
yn et n iS t est o t e t
et o rir a T J
aiear al ea hiid. i ru esM t t ei a cut d t rt nr uut t i ps s
t rk id a ucae qc s(E nt pr rel t r cu v
eee e
Qo o
bh n
oerno rsh T
i* ew ecye f st on t
I rt ss f sb m eir oe s
oceea p
ed mt u ohr L
e f e yh nenl nnoat t t o t
t m*
t o I r oh oacl t
f A
A em t
ara t
l s ef T
t oe B y
t t mt ee sod C
S acsne ld ey ea rt t e
i I r t nnl l t oss et r I
T ren"e nagr pepny h si.
T N
ph wel e
ya mypI s t aum i
I E
t oia rDS e oeu pqe R
r h v r'o c
sro n
et R
R ef sef up ol e
ot i ars U
$d o
ri cat a nvt f y
C C
n y
i geo r
at e s 8
eel ee 2
ergt 2
iuneo ol 8
vct l m 8
r orn s
so t i mn e
/
nn l
/
ad ee
/
er nr e
t %
l f aeC a 5
nvt l
dcyep t eut 0
ourf r
0 seio 0
i a m I lb arOe
/
evl p
/
t mmeg
/
f 9
weu t
2 l b e(
6 n
rs nmo 0
et c e
O oud
)
0 edeit seut r me i
.d ns 22 rl c ut O
vdeP O
n r08 0
eenqe t l s e
/
ens M o
/
ot o//
/
hieee l cs o soy v 7
R aeAt T
CefI3 7
t ff rt a
se D
n fl i
A TC S
E E
T L
E d
0 D
e 5
O l
s e
s G
E e
o o
I C
s C
t P
A e
s A
R r
M u
C O
o E
a S
T t
T T
E S
s S
w O
Y t
E e
S T
t s
'ra 2
A s
V a
5 o
f e
Tt f
B n
l t
E M n
e
- u M
t n
t l
U r l
S T
f ee C H h
i I
m O
s C
e E. m EY P S r0 ee 2
a2 s
u/
)
v se0 o
t8 s
1 8
a 0
t
)
)
n O
i 0
mN s
/
0 5e e
I Yt
/
/
r A
I D
8 e
2 e
t Sf oB I
P
(
G
(
c
(
n O
A N
n i
luJ 2
I O
I o
l a
r e
i
c IIDFEMBEE (ST5THC) wxAnotms I ono2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTISN REPORT JOB NO 1220 SHEET d OF h
Beneter Asens SOIEDGEE "P
ETSIEtt lasPACT ACTIf.00 ITEas900.
DESCfuPTIOe8 CUIIAEpff STATUS (WesAel ACTleelIgnamnem M EmeM SV m
g HEAA
- .EnvlCE WATER Surrl.T T/0 10/11/88 g I (10/05) nesolut ton et leCR 2544 - Sub.
Nca dispoeltloned by ensinceram on
-19e
- e. (10/88) leone final die-Eg 07/15/01 11/30/01 lec t : Creche In Type L-2 1816/79 to mee as Is. In accordance peeltles to field IIec II/20/Str sultebee E-512 ul th could's receemende t ton.
OCo 8t'K rguires conf iruet ton in writig free Umald before accepting dierst-tlon.
- Semed on 7/11/88 regelrement for 3 montbe pries to T/0 2 (10/st) resplet ion of pipe profilig f?Ce to completing profiling and
-15
- e. (10/88) Ceeplete pre-llPCe 07/81/88 10/28/01
'm a train out-et-roueJness teste.
filins 90/23/814
- b. (10/91) Doctelen by ase-IPCe later later egement en cleetsqs up II/02/0lA tralm Hel.A FRIMAuf WATER SYonACE AIID T/0 10/05/98 g re ANSE E R I (10/st)
A salaforcing mell le being added
-19
- e. (10/03) Seetse teamstric g
07/01/s1 11/13/01 eround the sig foundettee for primary dreutnge for pipe modt.
FD ll/13/Str usan storese tesda 0T-54 to resolve ficettees required for RFT the problem of crechig ia foundetion.
caell ila to primary enter Cenetruct See le currently drilitsig storage teset (07-54 feue-and grautias.
dealen)
-19
- b. (10/es) sed es e 7 hameere M
07/01/el 12/II/el s
re 12/IIIstr met t
-19
- c. (10/81) Flece forms and Coast Later 10/20/01 add reintercing well 820 Ol/31/82F ereund ring feendettee
-37
- d. (ll/st) lease Isollets to sg 06/01/el 02/15/s2 reelee Sc%eestle 7220-E-Elec 02/15/82F 407 for sender.weltage WK hn$
4 me.<s nne e:..
I I
2 k
-k k
k k
5 2
2 k
CR t. ~t ke 2"
h R. R tt R*
A h e,
- t. 3 Re &&
. g aa 2
iI et OR 20 g%O
-t~
g-n-
%R t"
00 C-00 g
j 22 2:
====== :
87 %
22====
8 1
3 e
e e
t e
e e
e t
i E
E O
2 3
2 8
4 y
g, y
~.
~.
o o
o o
8 8
8 3
y
~.
~.
o 8
8 w ww Ea s
m;X jib
}
.,\\
\\
p s} 9 }<H },s 31x
\\
t 9
a a a3 93 3 g=
2 xo o
~.
a,.
a a
v
_s 3
3
...r.
=
2x 1
,u
- 3. :: :-.
r va.
8 jy 33_ 1:
i, 2 :::-
<= :: :
e I
- *g-t i
a:-
1 O*2 2: -
00; :-
g O et :
-2 g
E
-A 2 3.. E tt 32 R:
t t*
R St
- .3" R.: ~o
% I a
- -. ~
oa a
t.1 3 sta 3 c
- oe oe o h
g b
bf EO O
R Y
2 3
$0 2
2 3'A E ::
4 4a 4
W E
=
_f i
9 h
h h
h h
i h
h w
a p
M
- e. u O
ri M a n t.
1 CM 3
-,-y!'
I b'E d
T r
i e
- 22.s
.J I
T.1 [
s 434 *f
,o
(
E CR
- a. l" j : :
v e
o 3
,m: 1 e
~
~
_H
=
.e.
c r2 3.r a
-- a E
O !!
i
- 25 O
5.
. : j :L E. l :i t
W1y a
e
,:-::;g.t a :. :ggt a
3 g,l. 2 2 t
e e:
a e
-t e..~..
o-5 L.
s 1
1-C i
E.
5 1
t' j
12 '-
$1 g's 6
w 7
5
- 5 2
W
=
n g ': y.:
g a-
-.3 g
C w:
i j j g
2 g
g E
ji u y a sa a
t-
- 1 s
1 g5 3*
22 2:* da W
a a: a xlr da a :X m-oN
$R S
89 a
a a
f g@
33 a
a 7
2 r
<w.
32 7
O g
N N i f.8 l
maru.=8 (STSitMS) mmat__
ununotms i ad 2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT JOtl NO T220 SetET
__b or
_){g, Deaeist Aeslas SCHEDIRE sysites InePACT ACTIOes m
pw Ittes NO.
DESCIMPisDef CUfWtENT STATUS (Westal ACitost SEOWutES M Snessent ST W enene Acteel I as 8 25s A NWB INSTIGMt.NTATION T/o 10/0L/SI I (S/01)
Presourlaer heatere cont rol systems regiaceted an FW f rum
-15
- a. (S/SI) Coordinate review Esgr 97/84/08 12/04/01 86W for nonnuc teer inmarumentat ion of FCF 12-57A Ihac 10/26/884 (NNI) changes. Tire revlew af 3AC Fly 12-SFA was completed 11/26/08.
-15
- b. (S/89) Icedity IIIst cabinet 8 648 08/19/91 98/l3/02 for FCA 12-574 (Set SCCC-12/09/Str 5819) 2 (e/SI) overpressure prot ect Ion at ne critical activities are 86W's
-10
- m. (9/08) Modify Well cabinete 8648 08/I9/88 10/30/88 leuer temperature lacorporat loa of Sechtel consent s to delete FOST control 10/30/Str and the final leeue of FCA 3 2-100.
2sHA talut' FIonD SYSTtM 1/0 01/05/82 I (7/81)
Gire flood tank depres suri-Purchase order has been placed and
-13
- e. (9/01) Fabricate end only Frec 01/14/02 04/20/02 sa t ion eender infosset ten has been received.
O soleneld weless SeeC 04/20/02F 2MBA PLANT GwertftES DCP EIntrlETiool 2/l%/82 I (S/SI)
Plant computer replareeent A held has been placed en new cable
-8
- a. (15/01) Sof tware accey-
@Ce 11/94/01 95/94/02 seul floor modification installatlee beneath stie floor.
tence teet, Phase II 01/94/02f Construct ien hee removed eoleting Fort I cables; electrical hoe completed layout s to determine misleias space
-8
- b. (11/01) Fhesa 11 freet-end OCe 11/04/01 01/04/02 requirements for cable; and prograsolag camputer Ol/04/02F mechanical has determined minism space requiremente above the cables for a plesase.
I seal 2tCA cGI SYSTtM T/012/l1/88 g l (12/90)
CtM systee A project penduction schedule hae
-6
- s. (82/80) Iseue deelge for Eng 10/05/01 18/05/81 been developed. Engineering to pro-large pipe supporte le re ll/16/SIF I
ceedise with email pipe and hanger contalment Wette 1 and 2 ST deelga, and large pipe strese analy-ele and hanger design.
-6
- b. (8/81) Complete erectlee Comet of first aus COf ourSe tra large pipe support deelga statae for t ank s l F.O. 7226-M-2 3)(Q)l coatstement Dalte I and 23 l) Teak 278 738 11/87/04 12/E5/01 80 complete (Sechtet) 12/23/017 73 complete (CAB)
T r/C lI/16/01 (cal)
- 2) Tank 4TIF3A 12/11/01
' M,01/08/02
/22/92F I
I
-6
- c. (S/88) Complete erect les
(.J C""*'
of test tuo CCW surge g
II" t ens [F.O. 7220-n-23)(Q)l run tie mw s se
IMIFEMbER (SYSitMS) wuno tars i.msa CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT
'S**" -- wat_
JOB NO 1220 SHEET _. 7 - 0F _A 3
meseom, aces.
SYSit se SCHEDULE
- P IIIas 900.
OESCAIPTIO88 inePACT ACT4000 CUnftEpet STAinsJ (weetal ACTIO90 ftEOuutED State Engerest aY m
y,,,,,,
g,y
- 1) 1.ek 17173a 01/08/s2 OS/29/s2 02/12/82F
- 2) Teset 278234 01/22/82 62/19/02 03/05/82F ouan riac HAfluc tanTEE 5UrrtY T/0 4/8/s2 I (9/81)
Netfiret team to ciremlettsg B6 del teostag ladlcates the need
-3
- e. (9/88) Doctelee ne'deatge M
30/02/01 10/23/s1 water ear cture well fin to Increase alw clearance between concept Clell 11/10/814 time pumpe end back e ett of the structere.
SS OSOS HAZARIWars CAS MostlinAllC FTSTDI T/0 11/12/02 e
I (9/4t) tisterdous see monitors on Bendte la come tseslag to weh on Pot ent ial
- e. (9/01) Cheese electrical P.O. 7220-1-204 F.O. 2220-3-281 but does not
- ritical supply for UPS appear to be espeWing any ef fort to recover the 9-10 wese4 already
- 1. Cet gestatten free P ec later 09/30/01 lost. Iso addstiment offort to wesJer SMC ll/30/SIF espected until the ciela to re-malved.
- 2. Evolwate propeest
- Eage, 54ter 10/#1/01 l
Cs 12/12/SP.F DIA
- b. (9/81) Final delivery Prec Later 04/08/02 sof aware complettee W
04/08/02F
- c. (9/91) Complete quellfice-Pree later 07/15/82 tion teetlag RMc-01/ISiO2F 1
- d. (9/81) Besolve clelm
- 1) Make recommendetten Prec Later 09/30/01 f.e c11est leIC 11/02/Ol&
- 2) Mehe coveteretfor Pree later 10/15/01 to wesador and mege-W ll/02/OlF tiete i
a
!k e
=
%A I N
sno eta env e ee
mse e
e -e c e
5 %rus i 3 te la =e gs j
a :=-
=
a=.
=
a= a:
u,
~'
3
' j
==
s 2
M.
3 J
J J
IwX 8,
ut l=
dl
)
2, 1
I 1:g t.:
a 1
- iid
[, e =
=
x s
.s
-Ty a a
a a
=li A
A A
A I
==:j g
g Eii3 :
=
a 4
C Q
n.
W L.
K w
li,1 1"2 2o n
.>c
.04 n
5:m s_s!
s IEm
-5:-:r.
=1
= a:
n
- ,.sr.a
}.
a I
t:.s.=:-
s
.:ss.
- 8, 2 sa o
4:~
p y
4:
r-J:,2 =*d:.
23
=
a
-E
,3 t
2.0".14,2 U
J
- [**
Isti E.'
E G
Zu'dt,*:3 2"
e R
- 12 2 r 3
.=E:~3 a:
- 2 e.1. 9.:2.: _
2 4
r h
E
=
i
.g 1
4 I
=
~
g g
c a t 7
N 3
y
~ U 3
E : :> :
r a!s
.O l.;.
E~
I k@
3g
-~
E 7
g a, g
i :.
i m
g l
g l
e NOVEMBER 1981 MIDIAND PIANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT (MULTI-SYSTEMS SECTION)
N 6alg e
~
.mma 11/82/88 felt T I-Mf STt ?tl
"S**"
f CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT I
m mo mm i,,o 2 SHEET 1
OF 16..
I 4,.0_FJO 7220 Does ter ^
r--
SCHEDULE AC19001 Schoenae Foreceev stepACT l
SYS YE as i
DESCRIFllON CUMAENT STATUS (weetel ACT1004 IIEOUMIEO l Dele Enteres4 SY w eenent Actieel l
8f Ete NO.
(4/81) leeue SEE by 12/01 (PCe 12/88 5/s2 4(4 5/88e)
Femple t lun of the l' AR r evlem N maa.ent
<*f Jelay le depenJent on inJearr-m.
(IIRC) 5/82F
.e..I l e o.eenn e of the Saf ety ll.e tenemption of erstematic review, alnete t welues len Report (SLP) by tie caspletion of review, SLR lesenance, duret taa of ACRS meetluge, and 4C
)
deret ten of lwaring process. Present-ly, the potent ial delay le 5 to lo mont hs based on the NBC-scheduled SER Jete of 5/82.
The NRC conaldese that a 5/02 LLA los.se will support e 7/83 escreting 18 cense l e ave.
1414/na) ill ah-e ne r5 y line bresh analyele Rennetrole of systems for Iltl.3A han Potentist
- e. (7/81) HCAR 40 (ltu.RA) and MCAR 40 (pipe uhly begun, incorporattng redesign and Critical r es t r e int e) rermating since ele faltlal analyste
- 1) Phase II - Tlee-g 02/01/01 02/01/01 i
la 1976. Rennelysis of pipe supporte biotory analyste Civil through (A) ist th transient t hrust forces, utill-en liold by IfUC chief SS 82/01/88 through later alas slee hietary curves, must be 12/15/SIF perf ormed becouee the earlier analyste used steady-state thrust forces.
The trenesent alwust forces may be
- 2) Phase lit - Restralet gF 07/08/81 07/19/81 r
slanificantly greater than eteady-dealse Civil through (A)
SS 07/01/82 thremeth etate alwust forces.
07/01/02 Engineering is to recoseend if the 01/08/82F j
of fice or field sleute procure materls.1 for pipe restraints.
- b. (7/81) IIELBA l
- 1) Strese design input g
06/27/80 06/27/80 FD through (A)
BT 30/15/81 thrasch 10/15/81 II/25/elt
- 2) leuclear design tapet M
09/02/00 09/02/B0 gene through (A)
JAC Ol/15/s2 threesh 07/15/s2 07/15/s2F Ai 07/15/81 07/15/01
- 3) Bestreint and barrier E
deelga Civsl through (A)
SS 07/15/82 thressh 07/15/82 07/15/s2P k
u4 0
.a.....
s ggj'
santL#ser.s
'**5"*
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT
~ ~g ~
fellTI-5YSTEMS Oste see Assen uintmotmis s
.o 2 JOU NO 1220 SCHEDULE ACTIO90 mm ye,ese g ST w emment Acemet seerACT ActtDas AE44 WIES Whose gasese4 gweehe)
CUIWEENT STATUS Later 10/09/01 SYSyges DESCIIIPitON Engr aff as 900.
- 4) (9/05) toolse and lesee til22/Str Csett ochedule fer retenee of SS restraint and barrier destan to cometracties.
All 11555 and whip restratete se held.
(See sesc-5455 and 5479.)
ee/27/el 121ollet
. (7/st) treende watety gr Caesi st/20/Str c
Informatten and typicale SS to the flate to factittete metertet orderlag retenties
- a. (4/95) Complete setente M
Civil Selsete schedule bee been leeurd.
Critical reenelyele of structores SS steele Seenelyste Setente reonelyele of all mejor and leewee opccare 59(4/88)
New st ruc t ur es e in process.
s response spectre are scheduled to
!! Amelltery Betidfag be evellable for cooperinom with Later later ortstnet spectre by old 1981 for a) Flytag Spectre llft3/StA leone of spectre east structures.
f or the dieses generator InstIdtag later later to cwelete.
, b) Other Spectre 11/211859
- 2) Service Water Pump St ruc ture later later a) Flplag Spectre it/271str later Later b) Other Spectre 12/04/elp i
- 3) Contalement Butteleg 2 later later e) Flplus Spectre 121:5/et I
later later b) Other Spectre 12/31185
- b. (4/el) campere eets-
_Eagr 01/15/s2 01/15/s2 egts/s2r cs,ft etc reopenee spectre with SS old spectre for Selmeic
,[
Catenary 1 equipment 9 =.,
i nonsu essees
n lawEMtER 11/12/88 _'
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT
"**'"j^
lef t.f t-515tlMS ulotAnoims i ano 2 9ene see Aseen JOB NO 1220
[
SCHE 0utt N
posee gr I
WT Astems ST ACTeollllEOUIRES photo Emesm4 svbitte CURRItJT STATUS (Weehe)
OEscalPipOA (PCe#
later 18/01/01 sitesseo
. (11/00) Develop en agree-10/85/Sl4 Indeter-e ine NRC leeued a letter op 10/l4/80 able alte-specific epectre NBC T
minate 24(11/F9)
Tectonic provinces -
ne seleerlogical loput for the for Midlead plaat o
lsele dref an criterte idland blotte propostag two bases ee M
SPCe f.eter later for developing ett e-specific tropense
- b. (12/00) Develop a plea for 04/02F spect re 1) Standardised response spec-completing the reonelysta tre bened en Besulatory Calde 1 60 or, bened en the ette-specifle
- 2) ette-speelite spectre true time spectre agreed upon Ja the kletory infereet tom on 5.3 + 0.5 Hbg3 meeting with the NBC et al.e top el the fill.
The CFCe consultant 8.se reviewed the Nec letter and has finallred the alte-speelfle spectre beoed on the letter method.
A meetlg between CpCo/CFCe conomitent/Serbtel and slie NGC ese held to eJerees the WRC letter and the spectre developed by al.e con-sult ant to estabileh a seleele bene.
Fotential
- e. (11/90) TSA for rolese-tulletta 7902 resgulree forther in-alon test of steel eachere Critical 38 ( 5/80)
Anchoc butte (unC sulletin spect ies of the anchor bolte to (2220-C-ll5) and torque 79-02 and MCAA 31) ensure compliance. leCAR 38 ederessee tenelee rolesett,ee (7220-other probleme tel sh enchor belt e.
C-Il6)
Develoyeemt of lastrucelone, spect-ficatione, and/or inspectione le
- 1) Torque tenelse test g
1.eter 10/36/08 Clell ll/06/OlA Retsastion teste Indicate prellennety report seide rway.
e preload less than ellowable bolt SS load.
e Later 11/15/01
- 2) Relemattee teetles 11/15/01
,I vender prelleinary SS report
- 3) losee draft report gE later 11/30/01 r
Caell 11/30/01F ss
- 4) lesee final targes M
Later 01/01/d2 C8:11 Ol/01/82F and tenet a report SS i
.lQ 't I
tb i
sno ese enw w e
cahnee.s
!!/12/st lesLTt-sYstans
" *"3 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT SHEET JLw 4
sentAnouwits ms2 JOH NO T220 DoneserAce SCHEDutt ACTIOGI m
y,,,,,,,
InePACT SYSitet CuestENT STATUS tweetsi ACitoel 3EcustEO phete Emesses of
%g g,,,,,
11Eas 800.
DESCIIIPT0008 Free la ter later Testinale are underrated (Refer-Fotentishg a. (4/06) procure terminal (Limiterque) teCAR 46 ence esta 3246). Veeder drastas de Critical board for meter peuer leede
'EE~
SS (4/st) teater-operated valves match walve ut ring as suppited.
- b. (9/81) Limitorque templete Proc Later 10/30/0l4 met Terminal board essor power feeds enviresquental apuellitca-Dec mot suppiled. Reference let.
L.M. Qst a te to B.C. Ash 03/31/88 time of genrothee 300 ter-eteel blocke (file Ml20g, M1324).
Free Later later
- e. (9/01) Lletterque crus-plate inspectles of 16-132 Dec welves for non-Marathee 300 terminal blecto
- d. (9/SI) Limitorque 'cemplete tree later Later replectag all 98-132 men-spec Merethee 300 termiset block
- e. (9/01) Boselve lanating-Ptee Later Later house 36-1234 eaviresame n-spec tal qualificettee The treme on the cometructise re-Fotential
- s. (2/01) Increased attentlee Pre-Ongelse stralas list have been cate3ertsed Critical to and reselettee of Stone M
$4(4/81)
Cenetruca ten Beet stat e en the comettwettee re-Team and emptied to be en Indicator of stralet tiet with specific the typee and magattudes of re-etteattee to priority straint o that by threselves are met 8tems stuaya crit t ral, but when added together are preventtog the sequential installattee et esterials to support eyelse turnover.
Cat egory 10/12/8t_
18/02/88 slechuelle 2
2 Material 40 21 Deltvery and Subcon-tract Auerd Inetrusen-2 6
t ot see N
li Elect Equip 18 18
,y
..ceae, Desi.e tarse F8pe 51 32 and Ilgt Design r2 e ste nav e st w
l
))f.f 1
Il
\\fllIlf i'fll l
I l'
F F
82 1t A
! l 18
!Z 38 88
//
88
//
//
S. %w
//
21 30 5l 1'
79 00 13
//
02
//
//
- Y4 12 1
1 2
//
1I 10 3
00 1I 1 1
/
s e
l 11 2
et I
c
/
Ma I
n I
n,,,,
Le r
r r
e s
r e
e t
t ac g,,
e t
a I
s t
a a
L e
y a
L l
g L
g 5 I E
e e
c 5
r c e c o C e C
" M t
e r M r
s g eE r
0 l
F S
P B
F E
" S 0
n p
tY EW TS E
CA g
r n
e t
g gn i
t s
t n
i t
t t t nr sh ir r
n uneee et e
oecrt ei el e-e n
e rm l wp el a et m s
pl4 e o
ngt ng s
li ont td i ns in6 t
E aurae nl e ge ge2 s
nqt
,d eer e
h n
o mhi ett et l e
i en eo el e
f o) n e
f ttb tt a D
ecee ge h
l wt t e abo t h to onrec n
t ecr ec r ienc eo b eo b eo f
le t ea e t n uSf e uSf tI esep ee S
r S
B U
B em e
) gel oge og I
8 nr u
)t nt
)t n O
l l t e E
)b o
n 8i od 1
iu 1
i I
8 a ree
/t t e 8arp 8 are I
em
/t er tt 0ech / t 8 c e. tnut 3 eic 9 aeo 9 aeo T
0 0
Sfi ooa
( svs (dnc (d nt 0
/
R
( o( crn t
i O
C e
b c
A e
PE l
l al al R
t i a i a nTe t c t c l
ni Ct ni N
oAe et i
et ti mPe t i O
or sw or I
Cs(
PC PC e
s T
)
ss s
sC 8
eg r
8 e
l i
i n o
/
aA ci e
y a
a t
s l
t 4
.t nt e
.h b
e 0
n e
t eut t
r n
sS 1
3 2
S iona.
mn e3
/
t a
o et 2
rrion see l
1 m
t s 8
9 2
8 t
oM
- a. se uy e
0
/
2 1
8 t i r
2 penth rsr db 2
e r
(
- n. i E 0
sl eat f ao e
o e
hy e
f n
.t T at ow td c c r p
y t
/
ebt ci r
.t l
eI ycal l ni se o
s o
3 b
t )
b 3
l n
n uaV e
d a
s S
L U
tfi re s
(
n e
e e
rE r
l l aI t
al a
r m
s e,
.T ncmet i e o
e e
p(
s A
A e
r pt res I
rreoe ee t d T
/
8 2
7 F
S 2
ret re yt l n
d t
s t
7 ub pg at u ed e
t m i ge a
8 C
S g
l n
t a
n nr la 8
i o 2
cmw n
med.
t a 1
uoeo e o) oe b
o e
l o
N 2
1 2
0 I
e l
s n
rt T
t
/
enl h c tl m4 pt e
l ei e
E 1
t e
R 0
l l t ct 4
s e
e 1
t a e
ab c2 d e r
a e
6 d
E d n J
I It e
o.
U nn tl pei-e e
s n
n e
I r
C C
n oat ab of n2 td t
A r
I B
O i B
f e
o a
n e
i co a.
t o-sl u
o r0 eu.
p b
)
)
s
)
)
l t s t os m
)
r 5
1 a
6 8
t g
s a e
y e i ag
.r e
t i nt ct l ac2 t ch o
2 i
1 1
l 1
1 l
ed 8
cf a
n ent2 o
D he pc tO N
r nd en m ut e7 e
t C
(
A
(
(
C
(
(
eo ey C
uierge r
e s
l t g pi p d sl eyn g
t i
n a
el t isi eee.
eo l
e l
i l el m C
P et msauuu hd O.
he
)
)
)
t l
5l lFP O
T C at ece S roF Td4 a
b c
og e
p o
e h qaq c ef pe e
t a
e A
.r N
C l
t C
I me ts y
S se g
l n
8 b
8 i
a O
r I
c o
T t
P f
t o
It n
8 o
C e
e S
l g
E i
n D
t e
t t
u t
2 o
e r
o l
n d
d a
a a
ne B
i t
e s
v t0 e
2 u
s 2
)
)
8 e
s0 8
t l7 8
n 8
8 o
i4
/
s t
S
/
mO o
s 9
sa
(
i N
yE (8
n sT
- m. O '
I 2
B 6
6 uJ l
llI l
mortcou gggggfgg letLTl-5YSTtMS
"'5" CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT ununolms : and 2 8HEEI L"
E JOB NO 7220 esseest asse.
- P SCHEDULE AC190ee am ye, g
assPACT sv$ttee CusteetNT STATUS (weetal ACieOes RE0 mutes p Emesse4 SY 3,,,,g If gas 800.
DESCeMPisOst
- d. (9/81) Submit test prece,
Free t.ete r 80/85/08 de Liquid Monitore dure end odelt redestga E
12/el/str dravlage (IS) Final assembly (4) Redesign e)
$stety-related display cabinete
- e. (9/88) Submit eagIseertog Free later 11/15/01 date to Bechtel eastseer-seeC 02/01/02F (51eca) tag for both Succe (2) Orderlag perte pertaining to senseeabliee terettsige with the vender are j
continuing en a weekly boats.
I
- f. (9/81) Receive cable fran Pree tatst 02/28/82 t) Cable 7500*
empplier (seetoe Inseta-seeC 02/28/82F 5400' precurament
.,(
ted Wire) a)
Partt$lly qualifled strberne
- s. (9/88) Sebelt engineertaa M
later later date to techtet eastseer-meC 02/15/82F munitore las for both asalters (2) Desten
- h. (9/88) Beeubett procedere Free Later later h) Qualificalten report addreestas commente; asec II/30/SlF (1) Partielly developed fabelcate and deliver hardware to Wyle
- 1. (9/81) Fleet ehtyment of Free Later 04/30/02 ell of the above seeC 07/30/82F l
- j. (9/88) Complete qualtftce-Proc t,a:er 07/30/02 time testing prograss seeC later I
66 (6/88) enquallited utries in mater Wire le betag qualif ted by the ven-Peteattel
- e. (6/01) Vender to complete Free later 10/05/88 central certers (NCCe) and det.
Electrical to to rewtow drew-Critical qualtftcattee teettog meC 10/23/SIA Inge, and able item will be resolved and embait quellf acettee sui te t.ge er msen electrical's concurrence.
report for leCC wirtsg (P.O. 7220-s-7)
- b. (6/01) Replace may non-Cemet later later qualifled MCC wirtag IJts later
- c. (10/04) Besolve IsCt M
later later 30-01-9-1-119 ( seeved slee Ig/30/ gly 9/30/88) en field-wg g
testalled wtre to i'
sultcheeer k
Ij2e $2e Mw MS
--p--,---
le#tLMcEtt let LTl-Sf sTDES balEISSLED dillfl#8 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT Set - 1L oF _m _.
unmotms l and 2 Bees ter Acesse
.soa no mo
- P e
SCHE 01st E MTIOst m
sesPACF SYSTEas CUIIIIENT S14f48S (Wooket ACTIO90 AE0tfutES M Emessed SV w
litse 800.
DE SC8tipflose Current restelee of spectiteet tee Peteettel
- e. (9/88) Reelee Speelftee-Esgr
'ste ch Critical t 8eme for lev &C teatrw-67 (9/06) invac instrumentatten 7220-M-340 and M-388 le incesplete 1CS erot et tee speci f ic e t tem for desten. (Beierence SCBE-377&Ieft-and TWE dated 09/09/88.)
ll/IS/Str g
kill Impact T/0 of selected IIVAC
- 8. ster 10/25/el eyeaese
- 2) 2220-16-308 ll/30/Str The field hoe f astelled $4-36 belting Peteettet
- e. (11/08) Sobett fagetry to g
later later Crlt tr.el A58E Code Committee for terch 12/01/$lt F1 (ll/tib SA-M beltlag esterteJa in meterial in accordance with the de-TCS tede case 49tE Pipe Support oise daewinge. Project estatseering bee net tfled the field that SA-M
- b. (11/01) Acceptance of g
later 3/02 te not acceptable for AssE pipe end+ cose for belttog stech 3/82F emppo r t e. It wee agreed that project TCt meterial egineerlag would pursue e code esse to allow use of 54-M betting 'n A9Gt supporte. Presently, ne act ase to betsg nahme by the field Thte team concerne cloself testise of Potential
- s. (ll/Cl) Beeps.no to letter g'
later 12/98/01 Crit ic al BCBE-3842 spectiltelly 9 tech 12/08/8tF 69 (81181)
Field's botting poeta tes batting entertal with regard to ASeqE addreselag time agreemmet.
TC8 paper (SCsE-3341)
ITT Subsectlee NF pipe supporte. Ift med to the field's poet-wee agreed to the meettag that br.lt-ties en civil great belte try esterial for Assa pipe supps7to to e camponeet etendard sepyset.
Telerence criterle le needed, other Peteettet
- e. (11/88) lease adottleeel M
1.eter later Critical
. tolerance teformattee stech 70 (llfel)
Fabricet ten tolerances for thee thee steen in draf t spectites-TCs (FC3-16-3040) j cleepe end pode stem 7220-se-36b. for f abricet tee of cleeps and ancher pode for pipe sup-perte.
11/13/01' Peteettel
- s. (11/04) Seepoed to letter g
later Critical med peeride etendere fore Ite ch II/85/Str It wee agre.4 that the lead beerlag 78 (18/88) threaded lead belt e (BCE-part of then eheset will met be coast-letter for use to ottele-1CS 3337 a) dered a y mbles, but that clartiles-las ciertitcottee free tien would be obtelned by engineertag the field's componeet and the support vendore. '
etendard support kendere
- b. (11/01) Clarlftcettes le g
later 12/01/31 else needed free ITT Beech 12/01/SIF 1
Crinnell TCs 7
e i
erro sie atv e<ae
" ' *
- II/12/01
==:=a leil.T I-ST STtM CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT SHEET _1L._or _ lit MKX AND ONITS 1 and 2 Jon NO T220 6CHEDULE ACTIOff Sehedste" Fereccet enePACT CultetENT STATUS (weets)
ACTIOtt IIE DMEM BY n,
Acemed ifEas DESCftspiaOes potential
- s. (11/88) Incorporate date M
later 01/04/02 01/04/82F flee field hee purchseed CSS f rom PD I
Critical regarding worlaue nasms-72 (18/81)
Substitution of ccuponent seve sel men tacts.rere, ef ter ediIch f acturers' itsee inte aff t and a rd support e, aams f ac-egineering not tfled tlie Close I strees reporte s
pr ojec t sured by campentes ot tier field that CSS manuf actured by ITY then ITT Crinnell, in Crienell could be used in Close I Clase I pipe support e.
It uma egreed that pipe suppnet e.
the field could embetitute camsponent etsaderd supposta in Close i pipe supports and project egineering isoiste mene ellouences for this in resteed stress reporte.
e e
e i
N V
,no.r. m e..
O
?'cfg
\\
t ATTACHMENT TO NOVEMBER 1981 f
CRITICAL ITDd.S ACTION REPORT e
GRREh7 SCHEDULE ANALYSIS i
i I
l.i l
l I
t
MIDLAND TLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 8
BECHTEL JOB 7220 CURRENT SCHEDULE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL ITEMS Schedule evaluation reflects the potential schedule fapact on system completion and turnovers or other major milestones.
Schedule Impact November 1981 October 1981 MLLA( )/
Curren{3ftatus Ugate[2)*(w*k)
Qarren Update (wk)
Problem Early Late Early Late Description Areas 40 31 6
Fire protection system 32 38 Fire protection safe shutdown 6A 26 26 III Reactor coolant ptanp hydraulic snubbers (Unit 1) (PPS-007) 24 33 I)
Reactor coolant ptasp hydraulic snubbers (Unit 2) (PPS-007) 21 21 Cold shutdown - DHR syste:n upgrade 65G Decay heat removal 7
20 III Plant security (PPS-C04) 19 19 204 PORV afd saf ety' valve position indication - refueling canal 17 III Fuel pool turnover (Unit 2) (To 2BBA-1) 16 16 HVAC-ART-ASP Room Safety-Related 59A Rooms Unit Coolers 14 15 (1)
Fuel pool turnover j
(Unit 1) (To 1BBA-1) i 12 12 Class I pipe analysis in contain-446 reactor anchor stud failure me nt (Fuel load) 10 2
61 Boron dilution transients Cold shutJown - MAD valves (up-9 2
65A grade and add)
)3(}
Current Schedule Analysis of Critical Items (continued)
Schedule Impact October 1981 November 1981 MLLAg4)/
J[pdate[3ftstus Upd a t e[2f E"*"'
Curren Curren (vk)_
(vk)
Late Problem Desc ription g
gg g
Areas _
2 8
Plant computer replacement 2300 8
12 21 Post-accident monitoring 19 Safety Parameter Display Console Neutron Detector 4
8 ATWS - provide ARTS 59(86) 7 7
Cold shutdown - miniboration 65C 4
6 Component cooling water 5
4 Plant status indication 306 3
3 Small-break LOCA 69 Emerggney core cooling 3
3 Cold shutdown - emergency power 65F to bicek valves k
in Project /2 systte a
(1) Items which are not 1
(2) Status through 10/23/81 (3) Status through 9/25/81 (4) Master List of '.icensing Activities (5) Evaluation based on Bechtel's best judgement il I
e e
o h
,,, w,.-r-a w :..e m ~
,,,. 7
-)
l *.
f.TTf.CEENT ?
5751 Bechtel Power Corporation
.f
's 5,a I,a,o, m es,is,senno e,es, sy j
Ann Arcor. Michigan j
w aasems P O Bos *000. Ann Arcor.Mensan 431t6 u
1 December 21, 1981 Cx.\\%"lL.y i
M BLC-12102 Consumers Power Compe.ny 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 er Attention: Mr. J.W. Cook IM Vice President
(
Projects, Engineering and Construction Cu med Midland Plant' Units 1 and 2 r
Subject:
Consumers Power Ceepany Bechtel Job 7220 December Critical Itecs Action Report o
Attached for your inforcation is the December issue of the Critical I
f l
Items Action Report.
i Very truly yours.
l
[j,'y
.n A. Rutgers Project Manager JAR /DJF/db Attachments:
1.
Critical Items Action Report f:
2.
Current Schedule Analysis ll i
D.B. uiller w/a cc: kSe iP.
?
5 I
, -: 7: ".-
'j' b,.,; 3 ; ',$dI s-3$.' /. d
~
y,'s '=,.E' . -
l sf
-l No Written Response Requested:
5752 e
l DECEMBER 1981 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT (SYST.W.S SECTION)
L 1.
il t l
l 9
O 5753 CRITICAL. ITEMS ACTION REPORT l
Table of Contents - Systems Section Description System Page Nhin Steam Isolation Condensate Supply and LP Feedvatar Heating 1
142ABB 12 2ADA Main Condensers and Internal S
2ADC Condensate Storage 9
1APA Cendensate Storage Refueling Canal. Head, Vessel, Internals 8
2APA 16 238 A-1 10 Reactor Coolant Pumps 1
2BBC Decay Heat Removal 5
2BCA 7
Makeup 2BGC Primary Water Storage and Transfer 4
OBLA Borated Water Storage 2BNA Auxiliary Building Service Water 2
1&2EAD Turbine Building Se rvice Water 10 2
2EAI CCW System 11 1&2EGA Tuel Transfer Equipment 7
1KII Fuel Transfer Equipment 2KII Perimeter Intrusion Detection System 8
Plant Access and Monitoring Security Systen 6
ORGB Security System consoles and Co=puters 3
ORGC 9
ORGD ECCAs System Emergency Safety Features Actuation 2
2SAA 9
ISA3 System OECA is not covered in Critical Items Action Report bu is being reviewed by completion working group.
No!I:
4%
Key Startup Systems l
i 12/17/6
~ ~
- 3. a + r u-
__M uf nuten _
DATE as w o Dt.LtJete.N SNEET
_t tw Jo_
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT f
asseter &sene srsrases PP unumursi ada I
JOD NO.1220 SCHEDeAE m
ACTIO84 IEE0uutEO geese gg (Wee 6 I CummENT STAitfS
~
CVSTEas DESCasPT908E IIE3 9e0.
/O Uett 2 - 2/1/82 g T
BW 57tAft t$0LA780se Ge t b - sTner hA 162 ABS
,A N
oeott. F/C Complettee Date 08/06/so 12/31/s1 llA Eng 12/3t/stF C
CWC F/C Complettes Date
- e. (12/81) Develop eschet-suech Welt 2 cet spectiscattee to TG8 Esatseering le revlevlag tettIn the
-75 weehe request speetes eplete centrol penete end vender the new regwarements (IEtE Welt I odif y actuatore f or the mets Std 323-1974 end Mt1EC 0588) for I (12/88)
R
-70 eseeks eese teoleslee velvee eew panels sad medlfleetlee to the e5/ol/s2 tt/tStei m
segr it/IS/83F s
ackustere.
- b. (82/st) seetow
=4 seene 8erch post 2 revistem to F.O.
TG5
-75 weets
( Alf 7220-N-11sA.
No. 001, RWS No. 9b40228)
Unit t
-70 weeks 7/0 12/08/81 g mEACTua COut. ANT PUB 4F5 esa Itso Cemetr. F/C Ceeplettee Date 08/24/57 01/19/81 01/05/s2 Begr Ol/Us/82F CWG F/C Ceeplettee pate
- e. (s/88) Ceeplete streme
$.Fjpe
-18 All enabbers have been received at,
and henger desige for ha tables deelse (Usit a Hydraulle osubtere the jobette.
forecessed for 12/os/st) 8 (7/79)
Appreatmetely 4.500 Its it of tabteg
- b. (11/91) Ceeptete pctisseest Comet and eseociated bessets will be re-La.D This may covee delays to reservette 12/22/01 c6/ss/s2 cometractice complettee of the RCP/
getred.
06/IS/82F stese generator ceabicles.
-25 mest 2 07/IS/s2 07/15/s2F Uett 2 d Cseet
- c. (9/01) Complete tuttog me 11 0 henger instettettee 09/19/s1 og/61/s2 f os/ot/str
-49 sett 2 notot/s2 to/ot/s2r past a JI eF/23/st 04/ts/s2 04/ts/str.}
s rage
- d. (lltal) seeolve att tree Cavil
-3s en meubbers statue les
. ;g ss J:e
!une ne mves,
~^
~#W__-____
=
~
- - - ~ _ _ _. _.. _ _ _
"' '88"O ' "' * '
lit.t;tJtels li'itt
,2
._or
,.J.a,,
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT Doesfue Aciten sTsrues
'~
C-ulot Armlms i nnd 2
[
.M)il NO /220 gctgEDIAE ACT1000 sy wm InsPACT ACTIO88 ItEOUutEOlDeee EmesM Iweensi CUIWlENT STATUS Later Later Og SYSTEM DESCiterTION
- e. (II/st) Decleton on work-later fit M NO le the tubing and Jet aroundt reservoir lastellettom regnited for system turn-overI T/al 10/05/88 $
usalNE SUllplNG StkvfCE T
7 tat WAltill g
Constr. F/C Complettoss Date 12/14fti Ol/JO/82 8,aler CWG F/C Completion Date
- e. (12/81) Receive eendor 12/14/88F reoc leeC vender le to provide two stuotes on rotometer 82/2W/58 Turbine buildlog service water quotes - one for normal Later I (12/81) delivery and the ottier for
- b. (12/83) Award purchase F3 12/28/83F hMG order f
am needited delivery.
07/01/91 04/ullet l
- Prec, 04/01/EfF
- c. (12/03) fabricate and DC i
-43 dellwer retometer l
(AMP No. 062)
T/O 12/05/84 $
t.CCAS STift;N ISA 25AA Constr. F/C Completion Date I_tA SAW 08/J7/81 05/20/s2 CWG F/C Completlos D.ste
- s. (5/SI) Fabricate and ehty OS/28/52F
-3r Fabrication and shipplus el the ble-bistables (pWS 880 flood system blatables tables forms the critical path for B-900041)
I IS/80)
Core tble lasue.
T/n 11/01/88 g SfHt ATLD WAf tN StilmAGE NA JCNA Const r. F/C 4:neples ton Dat e hdk og/l4/31 04/30/s2 Luc F/C Cumple aloes HJte
- s. (II/EI) Issue syntes CCro Lage 04/30/s2F
-31 Cs Issue of liCrs and procurement of JMA Mt.l.A 06 - Fire pratec t ioso -
tr.snuter muticle panel are the the us/ob/sl 04/Jil/s2 I (5/80) safe shutJoun critical activities.
- b. O /ro) Fabricate esid ekly reg 04/l%/82F EMC
- st, trennter mulich panel IC mewt 2C 4b6 08/01/58 01/08/s2 ly Engr ll/Jo/ulA (12/84) Assalyse lirl sesppon e.lec
-17 d.
tire protecti valves tus P
trE
)
a ml tunne FJ10-a.-248 (AM M
tirl nog. ply v.stvers Old, l;-102470) 2 (12/n8) ljl Nu.
r..v.
nm em se v e-as
li f
il
)f
\\l'l ll
'l\\jl l
r.
4
@ @Q F
r 2
A 8 t 0
~
2 S
08
/
f j
8 E
//
84
//
44 80 L
81 22
//
0 0
//
26 I
Jn
//
22 1 0
\\
i a
12 11 L'e e-0 1 c
F A"
/
O_
e" 2
l e
v s
5 1
l t
N/
e r
5 1
e
/
eC m3 0
t 0
_D
/
a 1
4 L
0 aT
=
E t
E e
'* H 04 rh eC
- S 0
rc gc rM ty gee nrte Fs t
im al P EAs C
EES S
)
yn e
O.
l oP t re yre g
piM aec pt A l
.hd a erF o.
uc(
aAt rl s ee l s0 s
se iF opr e
c5 rI e ee l eA 0
t o4 e-serd eeA 1
es rr2 t A s
r dr()
9 e
o p-s A aoo p
7 8
s E
er-ht e
e0 4
t ee-o5 c e
td r0 ee sr0 ef - rds l no0 F
yi2 v
A uea eao3 se lf 2 an pmh e
d -
s) t e
7 eed ac pe A
ey a
mt lt nrer sl t ce n
u Aee t aot u El n.
el p
e eo do
.b l w)
)t 6
o o
eI r e
) et 8 1t s TW
)
5 s r
so8 5iSAbd 8 sis W(
t a
set 0
/uI l
s
/e 2 qI nne /
sW 1 e - nai 8l eP
)
T 2l d.
e 1
O 1 e no
( rAAcf
( er(
R t
( eaN O
c b
A e
b PER g
4 s
3 mf e
7 Cd N
s A
P e O
aw s
st IT
=Cs eu AA 4
d or At NN n
.t e
e ay e.
e8 l s s
d e.
o b4 tl 8l e
~Sy
) 2 s
Cd mo/ei eoe I 8 dt t rdI/4 eo1dt M
ea ee 7#
oW1 i
E nt sep
./l e
/ er gh2 t o r s i D p21 e
ub i8 d2 at 1 ai T
t n8 ni rr t ut
.h,d I
e es e s
ea/
6 wr ep
]y s
O r
nt e
r ei2 9 t 4
m ol u
e L
rr8e7 p./
tf er A
ea l 86 t e cu l
T t D o
s e/b A
1 eh6 ned ce t
en W
ob n 1. or e1d emeao o
eet S
t C
eft o e
m l
m n
t e i oe. p el uor t
l o
(
8 esll edb7 p rl dt u IT e
pi r
1t uie t
mt
,l y a d l1 h cwh s I
t 7
l oe w
A o
cyt 1
u R
o p
c1 b
nl
.e rgsae s
Cl 2
$ai a/. e2 w0e pn we C
C 8
Co A
l0 3b ie m
/
/ o 3
FC e
c7 1l l t l s 8bd2t5
.C v
n//an8i o
ei so r
1 dh ut 0
1 r/
o a1 8i a/l et t
/
t F D
l 1 8 t 6
r h ec c 0
e / n 2 d oe c pi ss eshie 0
m ;i f
en2 e5/nor e
/
oW v
Do1 e23 aDa B ewdl T
CC g
C a
N l
l r
e e
O t
T i
I n
N o
s O
m ao M
ss D
dns e
N H.
ae N
At t
s T
e e C
s s y
$Y ee e
ES c
C C
c y Cf at Ai i
l t r Tt d
Nl s
nu i
a c n
A. C l e e
E 4
l p e t
P$
e w
s
- I2 m
r0 u2 e
2
)
2 uT 8o t
t 1
s eO En o
/
r T
s 8
a uN Sa C
t
(
Yt C
t S1 r
nH O
8 8
iO uJ
\\I lfl l
suu.
l CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT surrt i. _ _ or E.,
I Doester Acton svsti.ns unmotats.ada Casipsessen t
JOB NO. 7220 SCHEcagg ACitOIS m yw i
tasPAct gy g,,,,,
ACTIO90 REOUWIES Date EW (weets)
ClfelnENT STATUS SYSTEas DESCRFitOtt 32/01 02/s2 s
tit 80800.
- 2) ttt deers F-h 1%
Dn/IS/s1F l
-28
.irr._ haere A-t F-A (Much)
(Hock)
A partiet submittet of drawings i
were received on 12/07/58 Cal-l rulettone were received om r
i 52/ 1/88.
Project procerement end eessin-11/23/88 eering met with Meck on and obtelned Ste commitment to espedite system turnover priorfttee.
Mock comettted to e schedule leprovement of 2 weeks.
10/58 12/01
-15
- 3) AT deers F-45440 52/15/htr f
AT Deere A-a-A (overly 1 (overly) l prowlage and calcelseless returned,
M.iterial Codes 2 and 3 en 11/12/01 Dettvery j
lead time to & to S weeks.
i' la scheduled for 02/85/02.
- 4) Misette end pressere
\\
Miestle and Freesere testatant resistent deere (Overly l
Doore A-M (Overly [
A-66)
These deere are in the bid stages.
m) Beloose meterial Eage I. ster 12/24/08
)
12/24)SIF
)
Tentative delivery wee speeted as 32 regelettles for ArcIs 2
egg to le weehe ANAD. A teles swerd was perchase 11/10/531 however, a forenet 12/91 made en b) Febeteste and Free 1.eter purchase order cannot be leseed sentCl 1
the esterial regatettien le recetoed delleer eteelle E
04/30/02F from engineering.
and pressure l
reeleteet doore i
i retnAnt v4Tra stosace Asso
_t/o 80/01/st_ g 1
)
ees A
~
vaawstra mA Cemeer. F/C Ceepletten sete a sea CWG F/C Ceepletion Date l
- e. (11/81) lesse ItculuCF to Enge_
06/01/81 82/15/s2
-33 Ol/15/s2F McAR 53 ladicates a voltage yeaen-revise scheunette 7220-E-Elec SPE I (10/el) tielly below the tiette for proper 4s7 ter ender weltsee eartettone due to limg control (MCAR 53) (AMP 80s. 064 RWS 18e. E-El%244)
)
cables.
j e
Cft t
M I
i 3
ene ere innai 4
12/lYlel,,
DATE e5SilE3 l
ht.t.l.MSC SHEff
_5 OF M
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT f
SYsTLns Deeesee Amsten Casapeeston unAno(ms ( w 2 JOB NO. /220 SCHE 9 tile ACTICII ~ m pg SY 4,w sesPAct ACilO88 REOUNIES pote Emeese4 (weeang CUfut6sf STATUS 07/01/51 1t/l3/88 Esgr ll/lf/4tA CY57fte DESC# spit 0N
- e. (10/85) Revise'levoetric F9 IIC3 NO.
-19 A resafeccing wall le beleg adJed drawings for pipe modt-f AFT arounJ the tsag foundation for primary llcatione regelred for 28tflst) water storage teak 07-54 to resolve civil lle to primary water the proble.e es cracking la foundation.
storage tant; (OT-54 f oun-Conspewetion le currently drilling detton) (AMF Iso. 053 SW3 Wo. D-10504) and grouting.
9//01/3) 12/11/01
- Engr, B2/il/ ult
- b. (10/81) medeelse S hengere frees e and b are scoped ender
-2)
- F#
retain T/o of ostA.
(fJer eso. 014. 395 see.
' kFT apetes 0t8.5 but D-32504) 10/20/81 Ceest I.aler
- c. (10/91) Flece ferme and 12/20/slF i
LED add releforetag well aroeend ring foundation T/0 12/05/88 $
DECA 1 Ht'AT REMOWAL NA 29CA F/C Campletten Date p
09/01/58 04/01/82 Conett.
CWG F/C Completion pate Eng 04/08/s2r
- a. (1: Plat) Add cables to
-30 t.le c Espediting ef forte centleise for the connectlen liste 2AS)Sl59, 8FK Electrical cable solenold valves local control stat-E. & FI 29.355860. E. F.
lose, and pressure rellet velees.
2es)6160. E. & FI 2AS%Sl68 I (12/88)
E. & Fl and panele 2Cl4. &
~C30/38 (AMP Ms. 000, aws 4
As. E-1025Fo)
- b. (10/81) Espedite the M
1.eter I.ater aMC g,,
ledeter-These are ohnrtages of particular estatendlag shipmeate of alnate The most celtleal electrical cable en the cable types.
need el 9.94S feet of Stes 7 on following F.O.es l
P.O. 7220-E-26. Rev 9. was att 10/16/01.
freighard to the jobelte The hold by project quality enitt-meerlag on F.O. 7220-E-25. ten to.
use released II/II/88. Ikets furt (Coe O(*1 Kjl.
Feroeset dates shown are for rJ1 Isot e s the etert of delivertes.
-d Cil CO l
l l
t un as se v e **
1 I
mm 3
'" " *** " J ^L--
CRITICALITEMS ACTION REPORT amte 6
or _sa__
sumes os le.
e.
wamnouts t and2 co we=ea m uo mo l
J sC = eute AC14086 E
aspacf my ACTIOll RECWIREe m Emeesee tweetel CWAREftf STAvus SYSTief DEScitpft008 1.eter 82/3)/88 81E3 sso.
l) 7220-l.-21 82/28/elt 1) 7220-E-28 Appresteetely 5,000 llaear feet were ehlpped as s,f 11/25/e1 The reenlains 2.000 lineer feet will be elif ered 12/21/88.
5C/3p/58 1.eter
- 2) 7220-f.-22 12/2e/elt 2) 7220-E-22 16.000 liseer feet are to be later 11/15/88 ehlpped.
- 3) 7220-t-26 (9-38 Ol/3Ol52F 3) 7220-E-31 cables cables) 60.000 Ilmeer feet were ehlpped se of II/23/41. Apprealeetely 50.000 lleeer feet will be skapped by 12/21/88, and the betence by the end of I/82.
later 12/St/st
- 4) 7220-E-te 02/26/str 4) 7220-E-60 Shipment le la process and espected to be completed by 02/26/82.
pEstnEtta INTRUSION SETECTIOff.
T/0 06/05/82_
g Oncs SYSTEM ma c etc. r/C Co.,letten pote (h
CWG F/C Ceeplettien Date 8$
j
- e. (t/51) WPS facility levaC g
Current deelgia complettene for time E-procurement g
Ferleeter intrusten detectice field alcreueve erstem med necerity f
I (7/90) met support cemettectlee
- 1)10-156 Jey-fene shf{e Proc _
eyeten fence may l
regelremente for teatelletten and pesc l
teetles prior to systee turnover. -
Ovv-135 j
08/12/82 - 02/26/82
-2 et/22/e F J,
ites e la the action regefred Isotes celues le met e port of the security el/12/s2 et/26/s2 systee but le realetted for the turn-
-10 ovv-136 e)/26/str r
..ee el the system.
4 et/12/s2 et/26/s2 ovval3F 03/26/s2r 1
-10 ol/12/s2 02/26/s2
\\
Ovv-13e ur/3e/str
-2s i
1 a
\\
prte tte sav ores i
I I
.=
m
!d Il is is 5760 is 1
_e
~~
1 14 a_ :
=. =.
= =.
ss
=. =.
a
-t t
4B t
s C
2 A
A 5
s 4
q-2 3
3 2
'S n~
R a
o l
g g.
g w
Id!
Elk t$
sk 5
.i.
i 3
g
.!O z_g
..gy ji
.j 5 s ex g j a ;g.
4::
~
1 3-
_. l. iga 1
- . 2.
El -j s::.ic a.is -
a_
r:
-s
- s t
r:n-
__l i:.s 1.: ; I ai
- 3
,z s
==--[=a:ss-i 32 ag
- s s
- f
- _,:=t j_ =t
_mo
- s
- p. : e :r s ~e sen r-
- s. a
- a g e.,
= p-i. e s s
s
- : J a,. a t : s a s ;. :
=t:
.=.
- = :::::
g
==.=: 2 :
t: :
mo u
a l'{
mm
=.,
z
.o
-r sw on a
- <a 8L,
- , e s,
t.
e c
- 4 G
a s2 si a 314 4..
s W
a sa
.g _: !
e a
s.et z 3::::2
_i a :r.:: :x p
4
_i a 4
a o
- . s.: : :
13 :4!
13
- J:
1 b
w' 2 *I :.
a j
$ J4 17 "
1
~.
% 3 33 4
Ej
- j L) u e
E
.:23 OE 48 =
3.
l 2
- E Aw,,3 g<
C
.34-
$ $$ 255
$ $$ $$3!l P
I E_
_I.
=s a
~
m 1
x e
3 5
5 s
s Cl N
5.
a f
w m
a
=
"k
-=
a 2
2 U
eg O
O
]
gd sa I'
~
3:-
e.,.,..----,e-
y.-
A a
2t A
8s 8l A
1I ee
//
,i hay 81 8S
//
13 t
55
//
0s 0t
//
8 0 3u
//
ew e
5F 93
/t 1l c
20
//
1 12 4i e
//
10 0_ e -
11 eg r
02 11 s
s 13 F
1 c
F A"
1 8
t 0
1 e
/
O
/
e
/
1 e
ew 5
/
3
. 0 s
2
/
e 1
2
/
6 t
nC s
0
/
6 0
e d
"8
/
6 e
e a
6 e
hw 0
c S
T rc
- " M r
get e
d f
a eC sl r S
l r,h 4
a nA EEB
" S O
gcS 6
n If ti J Ts
- n. erU 5
1 T
1 p C
)
A 1t 8
r )0 e
2 3
l r
1 sp e
eA9 rl 9
s t
2t(0 ep f1 t
W noe.
1 a 7
ee f0 e,
et ee g e1 ml rA3 dt e o(0 nil t )
t d
tS Aae-1 e
O n
nt 0
C tE g== f s
e e
E oeef9 Fl s esre ee.)
ceel 2 l y eet s rl eD h sA1 euss nl t oI atI 8 p
s t
s ene(0 vp I
l t y pc 7
3 l
g l t s.
oea$
ed ees eeP4 vel t
t nl e
rnM0 e
e sll n ba ts FnA1 D
ou
.l o
ebt o
el o(
I E
st Lme c e ),
t N Bad l eo%
so t
e I
) c e
Bt p
1 d
secs
)
e
) at o
a 8dh2 t vt 2
0 eet O
) etI 8d 0 sooe0
/ ml u
/ rtl 1 sbS E
1 t f s
/al 2
e.
2 pnb 1 eaW t
0 oli
/ rl c,
f peae (l cR 4
1 d ee0 1 oue (aecm 1
0 T
e C
1 yh p4 (tf s (bes0 R
I s
T 6
C O
A e
e PE 4
4 2
R t
5 2
i 7
1 lT s uCt 2
N oAs tP e O
e eW n
3Cs lch(
e s
s a d
IT 4[
e l
e A2 e
t t ev n
N8 6 - e si t
t
/
- nh
/
t sst oe e
e IUt 5
eI earl nA7 Ah
- o. n l
8 tI el i
/
h y
/
s t el E
s l
2 s.b e 2
n8 prg Cs Ss b
0 4o ei i* ees s
- e 0
,noe itd e
rt ss e e M
I oceeedt 1
E e
- sel t
3i l u a
f e yh e
n t or y en" e
t 3voo D
t ee T
t a
a D
- esh e
D e
6rb s nt t oeg h I
S acsnec e t
e nt 4
o ea irnt f
L t D irenwe et f
na ae e
iD Crem t
oh id e en ph w e h/ e 4
A l o t oit rt T
t i
S en 0uat T
ew l o 2 gms pi r
hv eo C
t k
et ef sef gc N
l e pi 2 e y
ee d o rint I
E pf mt 7 s, s t
Cl n
y ed T
p eel eeh y I
R mt oe l
p ti ea s
Cm vctl n h
t oe Cl el mg t
R nn ie u
Cl 9
C C
1_
p 8
Cm a-el
/
/o eeGmpg2 FC f
n%
8 C m
/
/ o lI pt 1
omrWri P4 uu.
.C erC epil
/
/o 1
rC rl l 0
.C 4 gpd 9
r/
veu t
t -
/
FC 2
ee tT t
5
.C 9
r/
r-e e
0 tF et c
.dgeC 0
/
/
l 9
r/
0 t F eC et e
0 t F e
d dl e 0
mG edeP rf - F enrNoef s
O mG nd ebl
/
eW SaaAtLeA
/
oW ensae CC
/
oi T
CC Vaucd T_
0 n ;m T
CC l
L a
A n
N r
r iE T
e t
t n
T N
n e
N
'M t
e e
i I_
p
't g
P t
D d
l C
t a
I n
u A
r O
N U
t A
a J
g R
o 1
t e
O E
t M
r r
T s
P 5
s S
f e
R e
e e
C E
E E
s f
t S
F s
T N
s S
e n
A E
e N
s D
E a
S U
d A
I n
I n
r e
N W
E o
t d
O T
D n
n t
l iF e
C c
l N
L o
t n
e O
C E
s f
lu C
e
]A e
M n
v s
i e
)
n 0
8 m2
)
1) 8 a
2
/
t t
8 8
s t7 f0 s
/
o.
f0
/
2 A
o e
1 0
t I
1 P
p
(
mO 4
t A
I
(
s se C
E 2
1 N
yE D
t
(
mB sT 1
I A
J I
2 O
J 4
l i
l l
l<'
i*
I 1
l I:
i '
m nummmmm _
''2#
- "$5**
DECt>tet2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT matEi _
OF 2?
I system Osseter Acean ulotmoims s and 2 C _ f "--
I y JOB NO. 7220 SCHt0ERE Am001 -
OY gg,g gg IbePACT ACT90N HEOU4tE010ese Enterest IWeetsi CultftEMY STATUS SYSTEM DEScitePTIOff ITE3 NO.
_lArt
_ COwnEnsArs siosAct
__ T/O 09/05/81_ $
NA Constr. F/C Coopletion Date 02/15/5f 06/01/81 02/22/62 CWC F/C Complet f on Date
- m. (12/81) Review vendor
_ty 10(20/8tA
-28 Elec Plant design has provide <d Specif t-prints for q etettoes SPE I (12/88)
ConJessate storege cation 7220-P-1295 and eenpower to (AMP No. 023. RWS Mo.
assist le stress walkdown el syn-E-SOC 58) tee hangers.
I l
7/0 01/08/82 g MERCEteCT SAFETT FEATUpEs gg
_ I ACTUATio_N NA Constr. F/C Completion Date O_l/01/id 20/08/81 05/25/52 CWG F/C Ccapletion Date
- s. (12/51) Deliver pressere Fm 02/26/52F
-21 8tMC Deltwer of pressure transeltter le transaltter J-245. Ites Teeporary 3 1 (AMP too. 026)
Emergency saf ety features actu-the critical act ivity.
I (12/st) transeltters. Ndel 1859. are onette.
atton SEcuttlTV SYSTEM CONS 01.Es AND _
7/0 02/08/82 g
@Q CICO conruttas NA
@g Constr. F/C Completion Date NA CWG F/C Coopletion Dare Frec
- m. (3/st) Procure sad only 7
ReeC
-20 Consoles are currently in fabrication consoles OCA5002 and Security sysses consoles and et subvendor Apr.D and are seeeduled OCA500) (A-50) (SWS l (8/81) far delivery to Sygnetton by late No. A-40037. AMP Ilo. 043) compet es s 4/82 (potential early shipeent date of 12/01/01 04/15/82
- 1) Fct*ricate and ehtr 04/85/82F 1/821 Proe 11/30/81 04/20/02
- b. (18/88', Frecere and ekly E
04/20/82F
-20 estal detectors ( Astr No. 017. twS sto. A-30007) 1
- c. (11/81) Procure and ehty Fre,e
!!/30/81 04/20/52 04/20/87F
-20 s#sc emploelve detectors ( AMP f
No. #36. kWs too. A-30001)
Proc _
II/30/81 i/2u/52
- d. (ll/81) Frecure and ehty
/20/82F SO kMC E-ray enchines ( AMP too.
019. RWS No. A-30007) fhh h
_g,,-__
" ' " 3 # ##'
ar e.
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT SHEET 1 *)
OF _/_3 systuts essesee Acteen unt motms i and r C_-
JOH NO 7220 1
SCHEDULE AC19001 geg,,g,n, p.,,c,,,
uw
[-
saWACT sv
-a ACTloelltEOUutED ISete EM (Weses)
Clf4ftE90T Staf9S SYstEte DESCRIPTIO05 tilt 4 HO.
T/0 10/01/88_ $
U LIART soll.nlleC sEnvlCE WATEu I and 2EAD AU 8sA Cemett. F/C Ceeplettoes bate 01/08/82 07/01/01 10/26/88 CWC F/C Completten Date (10/88) Resolve IsCd 3244, M
ll/82/elA
-19 4
Itecta Release of pull packese by reelJent 5eivice Water end CCW, TCB eestatten of teCA 12 4 - Sub-electrical engineering te lleld engl=
DeCAR 4 (teleted to l (10/88)
R 1stelmel Strips is Muter-neering use completed 18/06/04 ltee 55, Pete 15 ) (AMP jects operated Velven too.184)
T/0 10/15/88_AMO 12/01/81 $
pF.FULLINC CANAL., IILAD VE*STL, u
2 sea-1 I
AND Fl.EktD8 r
ISeA-8 lNTENNAl.S1 Constr. F/C Ceeplettee Date 01/01/4{j 96 4 CWC l'!C Ceepletion Da e
- e. (10/88) Uett 2 Option I (Installet ten of lateret Ceest 08/83/98 12/07/88 Fesctor vessel enclear stand surpstas) in being p.aroved as the
- 1) Weld IIVAC evererte 18/25/814
-lE Lt.D l :ll/BO) t r ac t ure op t ion i remedlet action for beste llwate I and B&W end suhtet are emely:Ing Cemet_
08/24/81 12/86/88 2tiee new supposting system to reles
- 2) llook IIVAC fles ces-42/31/ elf
-18 1
i.Ep nettlene to head, leek I
ele gap.
seet
- 3) lastell trolley helet HD-08/26/03 12/22/81 Ceest II/25/5BA
-11 on menorell Ceest Oe/2e/sl 12/22/st-
-Is
- 4) te mien /dete lee et/or/str ts.o 6 belte se reactor vessel head 07/12/01 10/29/08 I
- 5) temeee held es yehe g
10/29/01A
-14 (pef Stec 5592, Isoc Coe.047241); h ld tsee JC teleased 10/29/81
-20 Q teint feel agaIllas Ceest 08/16/01 12/11/01 US/04/02F Lt.D bridges
- b. (elet) Unit 1 e
mee.
08/28/01 18/25/88 I
l) leeed eselding procedur 11/20/8tA
-1) i for yoke restrelate t'ag FC (BEBC-5741, Coe l
051303)
N i
N
- 1) h i
1 rno e2e atv e'se i
i
""3 MA-68.uws MI MN E CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT esseterAcuan 515Tu:5
^~~
E unxmoturs ( as 2 y,,,,,g [ rareceev JOB NO. T220 m Dutt ACitoes ses,eesse jm SY maPACT ACTIOst ilfOUWIE9 lDete tasore4
-p.
(Weeksi CUfWtfMT STATUS lef27/sl 12/lltel systral DESC8MyTIOne
-is restrelate to eterage eres Cease
.cs/2s/el 12/07/51
- 3) Delleer m AC ductwork 12/leistr
-n un Cemet Of/2s/sl cl/12/s2 ol/19/s2r
- 4) install twAC IFf-
-15 10/ut/sl cl/21/s2 Ceest
- 5) neek w AC fles uitzs/s2r
-15 up connecelone to head, leek test
- e. (82/st) seelse speelster-tage 02/82/s1 12/24/el 12/24/ elf Arch
-45 The reacter building Buel tion F220-A-41 end Drew-tal seacter buildlas fuel h=adtlng handling bridges have been prised, lag 7220-A-72 to include 2 il2/st) but sequite en addlalenet coating la direction se pelating bridges bridges. (sels scat;-
accordance with 5pecificetlaw 7220-A-4)(Q) and Drawing 7220-A-12(g),
3s74) see 12. (sels SCec-552A)
I T/0 12/15/el $
l AND 2ECA _
CCW SYSTEM Na Constr. F/C Completten Date C3/15/sf e, (12/s0) leone destge for ty 09/11/s8 ll/08/s1 CWG F/C Completten Date 12/02/stA
-Il pp A project productlen schedule hos targe pipe supporte le si I (12/s0)
.CCW erstee been deeeloped. Engineering to pre-conseineemt Unite I and 2 ceeding with emell pipe henger Coast deelga, and forse pipe essess emely-
- b. (s/st) Ceeplete erectlen' 12.D Lesti pipe el fitet two COI surge ele and henger deelen.
wee teamed 88/89/88.
tanks [F.3. 7220-N-23)(y)]
99/IS/sl 12/IS/sl larse pipe support deelse status for
-84 I) Tank 2T1735 12/23/s4F '
containment Unite I and 2:
O*/26/el 01/05/52 se complete (techtel)
-17
- 2) Tenh iflF3A Ol/22/s2r s0 cos.plete (LCA) h u&
I 1
i nm ere nav *si
I 1
l e
e 4 s'
idD s
C R
_f wm rr rr ee ee t t t t l
J_.,
LL LL aa aa M r.
e -
g gga" o
J
_g,4 I
m r
m.
r e
e 1
e, C t
M1 t
a g
a L
L T
g E
t E
E t
MS f
6 e
e H
0 n O.
mn 0
ei l7 a
t f3 CL CL C
A
)
9 1
i 1-d e5 t 3 r-n-
e eM o9 ne b3 m-t 4
u0 a
r2 E
e-)
t2 g2 s7 atM e
r n
se l el i.
p 0
i -
prM y
O l r e-Mt0 h(
E tu Ss2 S
U e2 8
)3
)
2 O
11 1 r 31 E
I 0e. /-
g C.
2v I
/
n 8
2 T
0 aP 1t 3
8 h
(h(
(2 R
u 1
C O
A e
b PER E
. MCk i
Ts N
Ae Mm(e r
O eW I
S
- s. T s
=Ci
=Am Ai N5 t
s
/
i 1
css 3
w
/
M 1
0 E
e T
t a
I S
D U
e L
f nt A
oa A
T iD S
t C
en f
I t
l o f
T E
pi t
mt n
oe I
R I
Cl U
p C
C Cm 1
0
/
/ o FC 1
0 C
/
2 e/
tF 1
s 0
aG oW
/T CC de e
f PL d
(
as N
0 y
l T G l
f LN p
P FI p
lt FT ug f
U _A C
sn SE i
S ll et ED E
t a I
2 t A J
er t
6 e d e n
Di nt s E oa eE t
C w t
'n si0 e
u2 r
)
2 1
i t1 MO 8
a n,
/
o.
fN 2
wO sM D
(
i A
8 oN VE A_
ST I
B I
2 wO J
I, h>l:
I l<
t 57Es l
1 DECEMBER 1981 MIDLILND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT (MULTI-5YSTEMS SECTION) b L
i I
i l
e
- -. - - - -, _ ~
,_.,r.
.,_,...__~..--.__,_.m..
_.._-._..m._,-
""I
- ' "
- C ace==2 86EEt JLor _2L CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT 0.notw acne.
esisi.ii-:.fsvu S C_ f "
usotmotens ar=#2 JOD NO._7220 SCHEttLE ACTIOct F"****'
l gg Of y
ACitO90 DEOMIDEO QBete EM thePACT (weetel CFCe 12/91 S/82 CtIRAEtti ST4ftfS
- e. (4/81) leone St.N by 12/91 5/92F SYSTEN DESC1tN'TI0es Indeter-(WAC)
ITEseeso.
e neonat of deley is dependent em Th einste pletten of the 75AR reetow
.e resumpttee of eyeteestic reelew, ti 40(5/80) teavence of the safety oepletten of teetew. SLR leeuente.
e Com andetuetton Report (SER) by the urante. of ACR5 eeettage, and c
Present-d Ee urettee of hearing procese.
- 1C d
y, the potential deley is 5 toD eonths beoed we the NBC-echeduled t
I SLR date of 5/82.
he teRC considere that a 5/02 TSEA toewe will support e 7/83 operating license tesue.
poteattel,s. (7/81) HCAR 40 02/0l/81.02/08/88 seanalyste of systeme for Ittk.8A has Critical '
M latt-energy line break analysis begua, tacorporating redeetga and
- 1) Pksee It - 7 tee-Caett threesh (A)
ItELSA) sad NCAA 40 (ptpe whly rerouttog ef ace the inttlet analysts htetery emelrefs 12/08/81 threegh ti 34{&/80)
SS Beanalyele of pipe supporte es holJ by 980C eblef 4ater
(
12/15/8tf estratate) in 1976.
with treesteet thrust fortes, ottit-v ains time history carees, meet be 07/01/81 07/t9/01 perimroed becaves the earlier emelyets
- 2) phase 111 - seetraint Esgr Cielt through (A) used steady-state thrwet forces.
forces may be destge SS 07/01/82 threesh The traneirat thrvet 0F/08/82 of gelficantly greater then steady-07/Ol/82F state thrust for.tes.
Easteeerlag to to raremmend if the office er ifeld should psocure
- b. (7/81) net.BA
- Engr, 09/02/30 09/02/00 enterlet for pipe restraints.
- 1) thsclear deelse tapet threegh (A) souc 01/15/s2 threech teoclear destgis taput to sneeded for JAC i
I 07/l5/82 complettom of the Unite I and 2 02/01(82F presserteer relief estees.
M/27/90 06/27/80 Esgr
- 2) Strese design input to throweb (A) 10/15/81 through
\\
BT 10/tS/st f
03/tS/52F
- 3) Restratet and barrier h
C7/IS/81 07/11/81 Cleil threeste (A) design ss 07/ts/s2 threegh 01/IS/02 07/15/52F
)
g t
I J
b l
4
,no ne ev e e ei
_ _pp,n w, - -
' ' ' ' ' " l'h~l' eco.==
M ET L OF J_
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT ms.t s -sysism Oeteter Acitan plotmoints a w2 6
e,,w JOU NO.T220 SCW0tAE AC19008 m SY y,,,,,g gw sePACT ACT9000 ftEOlfett0 ghete fatete4 (weses) later 10/09/st CURRENT STATUS Esgr SYSffaf DESCfMPit0M
- 4) (9/81) Beelee and lesse Civil 12/22/StF (ff et NO.
schedule for rolesse of 58 restraint med barrier design to cometracties.
Ati MSSS and whty restrelate en hold.
(See DESC-$4t$ and
$47*.)
Engr OS/27/51 !!/08/0t
- c. (7/st) Frevide queattty Cleil 12/ul/sIA i
-13 infermettee end typicale SS to the field to facilitate esterial orderlag Eag
- e. (4/81) Ceeptete setemic Civit Fotential reonelyste of structores Setente schedule bee been teamed.
Critteet SS 5eleele reonelyele Seteele reeaelyste of att major sad teoues erectre 59(4/83) 3 lece structures to as process.
response spectre are scheduled to
- 1) Ausillery Sutidtag f
be available for coopertosa with
- 1. ster Later original spectre by old 1981 for a) Ftplag Spectre II/13/51A tenue of spectra moet structures.
11/27/01 for the diesel generator buildles Later b) Other Spectre 12/12/elt le complete.
- 1) Service Water rump structure 11/2F/88 Later ftples pectre 12/tt/str s
s) 12/04/01 Later b) Other Spectre 12/lb/str 2
- 3) Centalement settatsd 82/15/58
' later e) Ftplag Spectra 12/22/str a
Later L ter b) Other spectre If/3tlett
- b. (4/81) Ceepare see este-Engr 03/15/82 (1/15/82 13/15/52F Caett mic reopease spectre with sa ele spectre for Seteetc Category 1 equipeent ha 33 1
a no ire nev eres
""8" ml8 L--
In.cima CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT SHfET JLw J_
Seenter Acmen unmotmsI rad 2 nul.In__-susrun.
Cementenee JOG NO. T220 SCHEDULE ACTIOEI m yw 1
gy mapaCT ACTIOellIEOtWIEO M EeW Swee6sl CURRENT 574f195 Cpte Later I,eter SYSTEed OtSCWitDN
. (12/90) Develop e ylee for U4/SC life 88eO.
10/14/80 Indeter-e completint the scenetrole The Isac Boomed a letter en 28(11/19)
Tecteele provinces -
n setemological Impet for the sal m.at e beeed se the ette-specifle leele deelga criterte idland jobelte propening two beses spectre agreed myon la the e
ee M
j or developing ette-spectile reopease ereting with the tesC f
j I) standardlaed response g.ect re s pectre beoed on segulatory Celde 1 60 o
er, 2) ette-spectile spectre true slee s
history infermetton on S.) e 0.5 Nbig i
the top of the fill.
et The CPCe ceasettent hee reviewed the senc letter and finalised the ette-specific spectre bened on the letter method.
I t
A meetlag between Cpte/CpCe i
comeultent/Sechtet and the 88RC was held to address the unC letter and spectre develepgd by the censultant to establish e seleele base.
Peteettel
- e. (11/00) TTA for rolese-ties teet of steel eschers tullette 7902 regelree forther le-Critical a
Ancher belte (essC Bulletin spection el the eachor belte to (7220-C-Il5) and torque 18($/so)
MCAR 31 eddressee toesten relseetles (7220-79-02 and 4eCAR II) ensure esopliance.
ether problems with enchor belte.
C-Il6) l Development of instructlene, spect-11/15/01 fleeticas, sadfor looyectione le
- 1) noteestles teettag M
leter 10/30/014 Civil Relenettaa tests Indicate vender prellelsery undervey.
SS e preload less then elloweble belt report (lead celle) l j
- 2) leseo draft report of M
l.et&r 11/30/81 load.
01/0s/s2r Clell the releostles testing Ss f
strela sese l
l 01/98/s2
- 3) 1meme fleet tergne tage 1,eter et/3h/52F Civil and tonelee repett SS
?
- e. (9/91) Lletterges to com-M l.eter Later Fetentiel feech plete replacing all 90-812 Terminole are underrated and/or Critical TCa Meter-operated valves ungualilled.
esmMerettien 300 tetelmel 11(4/85)
(Liettorque) - NCAR 46 block A meeting to scheduled with Laelterque and lleary Frett for
- b. (9/01) Lletterque to coe-Eage Later tote I
l 12/II/88 (et Ann Arbst) to plete leepectiew of 30-132
@h seech TG8 deeelop on action plan.
eelves for ese-Iterethen 300 teraleal blocto l
l t
l
,nou.
e.
e
' * ' ' ' *
- 12ni C 84.12J08tB CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPSRT.
SHEET _lL OF J_
l essenes Acaen nue.rs-systues f-umuwotms v.nar 1
i JOU f40 1220 J
SCtetDUtE ACT:Off mm uw pw eV IIePACT AC13ON RE00mmE9 lDete Entesent Sweetal CUmstENT STATUS Eats user Later SYSTEtt DESC Wit 006
- c. tv/sl> mes.l.a vestins-lif *2 NO.
f Mecle house 90-813A environmen-TG5 tal qualllicottee Later Later
- s. (4/SI) Frecote terminal PLac Patential MMC Ves=Jer dre9tage de not matcts valve board for ester power critical rotentist t.letterges wiring as supplied. Terminst Reeds beard outer power feeds were not problems (Ref loH, L.H. Curtle supplied.
a.C. Ash, 03/3t/88; Flies M-120y, to ongelag Pre-M-132Q).
- s. (7/81) lacrossed etteetten rotential to en reselettee of itene j ge The Iteen on the constrwctlen re-critical Tese onstructlen Restrelate tiet have been categorised en alie cometraction re-etselet strelat list with speelfte 44(4/81)
C sad coepiled to be en inJltater of the typee end magnitudes el re-etteetten to priority entsinto that by themselves are not Itees etways critical but, when added together, are preventing the j
sequentist testelletten el materials to support eyetee terrareer.
ll/or/st, 11/23/88
$8.les!!1 2
2 stochvolle Noterial 35 39 Delivery and subren-tract Award 6
3
, instrinnen-8 totten Elect Equip 18 18 and Recevey Design 32
, 12 1.orge ripe and Itgr h
Deslan a
2 O
'e stech Equip bestan CS 1
Cisti Design 29 20
)
IIVAC Deelge 12 26 88 S. ripe sad 88 Ilge Deelse 1,ne.,e,s.ve.
~
[ * *., y ~'};~-
lat.tTM84.R CRITICALITEMS ACTION HEPORT I
Doester Aceton Mutil-sts nns CW unxmotwis t.na,
.p()U M). 7220 SCHEDutt N 3cemeente Fereceso
/
ST wenient Acesist WACT AC190tt IIEOUBIED(Dete fatore4 (Weet sp CUltMNT STATUS SY5itag DESCRIrftON fff to NO.
11/a2/98 11/21/88 Ce egey 1
3 Pipe Dee. to Meet llrdres 2
2 Open gecas 206 225 Totel-frue Schedste tapact mer result ediatles moalterlag erstee redeelga, f abricetton, en asecebly 68(9/88) p of electreele modules (vtraereen F.O. 7220-J-244).
The redletion monitettog erstes 12/30/81 12/30/88 consiste eis
- a. (9/81) Sebatt toterbey M
12/30/SIF potentist BMC 2 computers (both operettonal Critical test precedure, and SBDR commection dreetage.
!)
for een in oefteere develop-Proc 11/1/81 08/11/82 sent)
- b. (9/81) Ceeplete teste med Ol/IS/82F e
-lo mMt.
ehty Engt 12/IS/81 12/30/81
- e. (9/81) Revles revloed 12/30/81F Cs
-2 60 ares montter- (fatty test procedure.
JMA 2) sesembled and in final 01/01/82 08/15/02 Free test)
- b. (9/81) Cueplete test end Ol/15/82F reteettet BMC Critteet aliip 02/15/82 12/30/81 Free 12/)o/81F retenttet
- e. (9/88) mese,ett States ANil~
tevel 2 dreeings 26 strborne montters Critical (sesembled oncept for elec-02/01/82 01/30/82 3) tree tronic subcomponente)
Stentsel
- b. (9/88) sabelt teet E
01/30/82F Criftest procedores 04/01/82 04/05/82 g
Proc
- c. (9/81) Complete esseebty.
E 04/OS/81f
-1 test and abip 01/Ol[82 03/01/82 Proc
- a. (9/81) Reseboett dreetage 03/Ol/82F roteuttel EMC 24 safety-related monitore critteet 4) rm 01/01/82 12/11/01 (parte en order, subeseembites 32/11/s!F la Inttlet fabricettee) retentlet
- b. (9/81) sonett teet MMC Critteel procedures
.Y
~
i
~r:2e iro mov e.es
bauma
4taissin.wwal._.
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT St<EEf ll OF 21..
MWUN0(MS I end 2 WLt -nsmes JOU NO.1220 este ser Acese
- P SC9E9EE IIePeCT AC9tOSI Scheeste Fenessee SYSTER8 31E00 000.
OESCIIe8?IO90 CUsetElef States (Weehal ACTIOIS SEORMIES M Enesse4 SY 4
w
-4
- c. (9/08) Complete seeeably, Free 04/98/52 es4/je/82 test, and ohly seeC 44/30/s2F
- 5) 22 Itquid monitore (9%1 reteatted
- e. (9/el) sobett test Proc 82/3 stet 12/te/st sesembled)
Critical procedere 800C 12/le/ elf
-4
- b. (9/el) Complete seesably, Free ottis/e2
- 2/16/s2 teet, and ship esec 92/14/s2F 6) 2 estead rease mentters Petemelal
- s. (9/el) Seen belt States Proc 92/1$/02 12/W/31 (seseebied except for elec-Critical Level 2 drewtmee spec 12/30/ elf t runic subcumponent e) reteettet
- b. (9/el) sobett test Proc st/elle2 el/w/s2 CsitIcel precedores esec et/30/eff
-1
- c. (9/05) Ceeplete seeeebly, Proc 04/98/52 e4/e%/92 test, and ship esec 04/cStett 2) 7500 lleeer feet of cable retential
- e. (9/08) ship 2300 ilmeer Proc 94/98/52 98/15/52 Critical feet with eres meester esec et/I)/s2F reteettel
- b. (9/01) ship beleece Free 94/30/s2
- 2/25/02 CrItIcol IstC 52/2e/82F e) Oseltftcettes
-1
- e. (9/05) liesebett precedere Free 12/05/51 12/11/88 esec II/II/ elf Peteettel
- b. (9/st) Ceeplete test Pree I.ater 07/30/02 Criaical esec e1/30/s2F M(6/el)
Ungpseltited wirine la ester site to betes goaltfled by the een-Peteettel
- e. (6/el) Vender to templete Free i.et er 8e/5S/88 reatrol centers (seCCs) sad der. Electraces le to restem drew-CritIcel quellfirettee testine and W
title /str face, see this item will be resolved eebett <psettiteettee switcheear open electrical's concurrence.
report for leCC wittne (P.O. 7229-e-F)
A CPCe meetime (12/04/04) fadicated that reetelone to the quellficettee re
- b. (12/88) servey P.O. 7229-enge later list getremente are forthcealme.,The e-f ecepe te deterates Pter elec 8/s2r letter f ree CFCe wille the resteed er scr; forecast for 1/92 era requiremente should be oestlebte 32/31/el. It is settelpeted that
- c. (6/st) Seplace any on-Cases I,ater Lat er me reeurtt by constrocalem will be geeltiRed leCC wirine BAe Later regelred. A reopense to stie IsetC will be prepared after Crce's
- d. (10/08) Semolve SCS enge I,ater 88/35/t2 0-08-9-I-119 (toemed
.Elec el/22/02F letter is restewed.
9/30/81) en field
- Set instelled stre in outscheeer N
u j
erro ere ps e e ne
wan_
8"S *"*
wCuessa SHEET __Il ~ CF J2__
CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT R-
)
tous.t -srsitMs
"" W potmoums :.ms 2 I
JOB NO. T220
~
SC8eE04RE 3
ACit000 IltOUutES m EW tween CWIREsti Sfatti$
IE DESCHirt:006
- e. (9/88) F.eelee specifits-s_ ear Mech Peteettet tiene for NTAC lettre-TGt restelee of spectiteettee Csitical urrent c220-H-380 end H-381 le Secomplete mentetfea Hv4C teatrumentettee 7
10/2S/St i
(Reference BCDE-37748Q-later 4F(9/st) pecification for deelse.
and TWE dated 09/09/85.)
- 1) 722048-300 12/os/sta s
gn':L Ullt lepect T/0 et selected MTAC
- ),2.,1-m m
.,et-e 12/01/51 Esgr Later it/06/JIA
- e. (11/95) labelt togetry to forch Peteettet ASME Code Committee for The field hee le.stelled SA-36 battlesCritical TGs A-34 belttog esterlate la meterial le accordesco with the de-code case tage Later 3/42 7)(ll/st)
S Freject easteeerles ASME pipe support enge d'owlege.
- b. (11/81) Acceptance of 3/82F hee settiled the field that SA-36 i
plech se est acceptable for ASME pipe code case for bottleg TGt It was agreed that project seterial supporte.
eagleeestes would parere a code case to allow mee of 54-36 holttog to Fresently, se actlee ASME empporte.
12/01/08 to betog tekee by the field.
, s. (II/al) Reepend to letter Later M
11/18/85F feech ireteettel 3CSE-3442 opecifically This Stee concerse closelficottee of Cetticet TCt Field's belttog peettfee belttes seterial with regard to A$eE addreseleg the agreeeemt, I
ITT Sobeectten we pipe espporte.
eed to the field's post-It 49(18/51) peper (DCSi-3842) wee egreed le the meeting that belt-ties se tiell great belte tes esterial for A$eEE pipe supporte Later (Ator to e composent etendard support.
- a. (11/88p Tsous additlepel M
12/09/91A secch Peteettet tolersace teforsettee Tolerance criterte le needed, other Celtical TCS Fabelcettee tolerances for than these steen la draf t Spectitte-(FCN-N 3040) 10(!!/01) cleeps med pode stem F220-N-M6, for febr8cettee of
- b. (12/01) leaue complete lle Ceems Later later 4
Later cleepe and anchor pode for pipe sep-of Grimmell itgeres that LED perte.
were destaned, or could beee been destgeod, per-teletes to licenetog megettettoes N3 l
N5 C4 1
522e ste Ne ede I
l c
_m
"'8p2 eEroinEn CRITICAL ITEMS ACTION REPORT or out _zu Mou s-sismis I
Osteles Attene E"~
moi.moters t and 2 i
SC04f M E N
nm pe,eceeg I
mo 3,w 37 g,,,,,g teePACT 4Cf9mf flEOllWIES Wete Esteses4 tweetst 1t/t3/81 CultftEtti STATUS Later hgt ll/25/StF SVITEgg DESCftlpTIOtl
. (11/51) Deeelop stenderd Mech potentist a fore letter for field god ITEst MO.
ale need bearing Critteel ITT Cris.nell (steC-5707)
TUS It wee agreed thet readed lead bolse (PCsE-part of the shank will not be comel-t(II/88) th deced a p<c4 Ice, but that clattfles-f Engr _
Later 12/01/88
~
)))F m) tion wuvid be obtained by engineertas
- b. (11/81) Obtate clarif8-ot/13/52F Mech and the e pport vendore.
cetten free ITT Crtnnell TGS (CLatt-2471)
Rater Cemet t.ater
- c. (12/81) segeest and Lt.D Later receemend clartitcatten from field's vendere Later Cemet 1.ater
- d. (12/88) Field to proeide He~
1.ater venders clartilcottee free to mechanical engineerlag
- Engr, later Later
- e. (11/81) Finst roepenes Mech Later to letter TC5 01/04/82 Later Engr,,
Ot/04/92F
- s. (ll/Bl) lacorporate date 1
FD Fotential regardlag vertous eene-Rrt The field hee perchased CSS f ran Critical substituttoe of responent several manuf acturers, af ter uhtch facturers' Items tote F2(11/88) stenderd espporte, ennatec-project engineering mattfled the Class 1 attees reporte field that C5$ senef ectured by ITT aured by compantes other then ITT Crinnett, in Crinnell could be used la Class 1 It was agreed that Claes t pipe supporte pipe muyporte.
l the field could esbettlete compement standard supports in Class i pipe supports and project engineering would este allowances for thle in revloed etrese reporte.
I i
]
)I 1
i l
L.n --_e_.t______
o,.
S 4 )
i i
5;t3 i
I ATTACHMENT TO DECEMBER 1981 CRITICAL ITEM.S ACTION REPORT CURRENT SCHEDULE ANALYSIS i
l l
l l
~^~**+---r-~._,,,,,
"""7eww gi, y
h
> +4
%+%+ %?
o.
IMAGE EVALUATION
(@4 g
fjj/// '(f f///
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
- 'g<.
4 pjjp (4
,f#
pp
+
l.0 52Da l M BE
,_ in
==
l,l f,30 b$O g,g I.2 5 l.4 g
150mm 4--
6" g4+4
- hf5);;,,
+)g'V&
7
%/
O 5W6 HIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 BECHTEL JOB 7220 CURRENT SCHEDULE ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL ITEMS t
completion Schedule evaluation reflects the potential schedule impact on sys em and turnovers or other major milestones.
Schedule Impact November 1981 December 1981 Currenk2jtstus Curren{3jtatus g4)/
Update (wk)
Update (wk)
Late _
MLLA Late
}Early Problem Description Early 40 Areas _
38 Tire protection system 24 6'
38 1)
Reactor coolant pump hydraulic snubbers (Unit 2) 32 37 Fire' protection safe shutdown 26 l
6A 34 l
Reactor coolant pump hydraulic d
snubbers (Unit 1) 20 34 h,
Plant security (PPS-004) 8 II 17
'l Decay heat removal 17 16 (1)
Fuel pool turnover (Unit 2) (To 2BBA-1) 14 15
()
Fuel pool turnover (Unit 1) (To IBBA-1) 6 14 Component cooling water 8
10 Post-cccident moni:oring Safety Parameter Display Console 19 Neutrcn Detector 10 10 Boter. dilution transients 61 I
i i
1
~
5V7 Current Schedule Analysis of Critical Items (continued)
Schedule Innact November 1961 December 1981 Curren{33tatus Curren[23*(*wk)
Update gg)/
Update (wk)_
g g
MLLA g
g Problem Description 9
Areas _
9 Cold shutdown - MAD valves (up-65A grade and add) 16 7
NVAC-ART-ASP Room Safety-Related 59A Rooms Unit Coolers 7
6 Cold shutdown - miniboration 3
65C 6
69" Small-break LOCA Imergency core cooling 4
5 Plant status indication 19 t
306 4
PORV and safety valve position E
204 indication - refueling canal
)
4 4
Class I pipe analysis in contain-reactor anchor stud failure 446
[)
aent
['
(Fuel load) 8 3
Plant computer replacement 2300 in Project /2 system (1) Items which are not 11/20/81 (2) Status through 6
10/23/81 (3) Status through (4) Master List of Licensing Activities (5) Evaluation based on 1
l l
~
I l
l
] _.$%.
b 5
. + - - - - WWP
~ - ' -
' - - ^
x,
$> p..
i aTTE.CH",ENT 9 4
a
- A_ [
MNE I l *_.
y;
.Q..
(si
' y
~
2 W
- m..
. Q p.y ?
s n-
.s.
p ogg3y r
18
[
.b5n111 van,F-24-42h rams ggg E
este A
12, 1960 k7 _
~
wmej smase:
1rM s'm FnostC':
- ~ ~ ~
Trmvas VITs NT j
..2 CA'::: I4AD FOMCdIT PA7EI, MIC CF 7/29/80 come M
!j
. OFI: 53*SO
- STFlAI, 9996 m 65-20
)
l CC JWCook, F-1ks1133 t
GEKeeley, F-14-113A 3C: IMB/JZ3 I!!Niner, Midland (3)
File: 0505.16 g
0 ',
The purpose of this meno is to doctment the sub, feet telecenz which occurred j
M1 os August 7, 8, and 11, 1980 involving D Hood and 3 Iovelace of the Izc and 1
T J Sunivan, O 8 Keeley, D 3 Miller, K R Elfr.e. aca D D Johnson of CP Co.
}
The NFC initiated the series with s, call to T J Sullivsc and a ecoference can
, III includirs D 3 Miller was set up the afternoon of August 7 to clarify IBO questions
'which they stated as fonows:
h, s -
p}
r i
.gy 1.
h=%;.lon of bun quaz.tities by the IRC implied that the plant constructio9 would bo approximately 7TS coerplete althou:,;h they acknouled ed that Midisod 8
~
vas behind in the electrical area (cendnit, cab:e, teminations). The ecult"
==
not reconcile this vita CP Co's estimate of to co man-hours and the result.c=
reported 575 ccep3ete. They asked If this was due to more rework.
j.
2.
The EEC indiented they had etsplaced their copy of A R !!n11enhopf's slides and would like a copy plus more ir. formation on lunc-lead items showing neca-tive float based on turnover dates to support a 7/83 fuel load.
O 3.
NFC questioned the K. D. Bailey baneout oc ere;i teerinE 5 corpicte by discipline
~
as to the 1:v 5 cceplete for 2nclear Systema (1h5) and I.icensing and Ezfety o
(195).
~
i Ites. Yo. 3 was deferred bssed on inavailability of key people and to anor further research and a complete restcase. I responded to Ites No. 2 by seinc crrer each oce and reitersting the points made at the 7/29 :ecting, ie, some iteus.are critleti due to uncertainty of 350 rrTc.f rements, ecue are tot rete. ired by 220, l
l a thedules do not reflect s,ecisl efforts in design, procuremect, and testing, our special efforts to date have sho-c.n ability to eliz:Innte n.Cative ficat, etc. I et;hasized that 7 thety;ht our special effort a combined with tas.ediate interactice with MC to define requirement s and schedule for implementation wenld cause these it.-r.s not to impact a 7/83 fuel load. I subsequently transmitted another copy of Hollenlopf's slides to EC.
I responded to Itas Io. 3 by Def atin;; out that the two groups in questic:. va e sew.
7 confir=ed this in a a
telecon with NRO of 6/8 and in fact the handout cleerJy shows that the two groups are new and previo : sly had been tecoryorated under :sechanies1. Ccuspletion 5 fer O
I, these two is based on an est1:nate of rer.sining vorg at the tia.c c,f Lcchtel's Q
reorpitst;o. In Spring I?SC.
y CP Ce respondad to Item No.1 in a conference er.11 c,o 8/01. After I atr_.-arized T'/e't;'m telcetc.s and *;M !cdicatt4 thc.t all other itena had been satieferterily
~
e, 5
- n -
e-wm MO.,..x..
.r. :y;hg-% -
gra ; 'MMM i e'
..s igps.M.V,.0.
9[{t y$ h f b d h,g ps,3 4 k h a. y
- q ',3f wn i
hhk tgg m 4
g%g435%$,4Qa&. u,:a.
fi.dF7 1
s:.
vm wp -
'. ;. y.
wQc.~-. -.
... ~p._. g:.r.... f &. Q. W g-f & p: a._.~g, :, ;
.... J
-er 1 ~_
y g
w,~
- 5. '*
~
00?38,
i
- g %s.3 answered, Emeley pointed out that the estimates of remaining man.-hours inelade necessary rework.
Miller stated that the primsry reasocs for laver mit inst 114 7
tion rates were ecogestion in critical arcas and the fact that design ecsgletion is not far enocch ahead of constructico. It was pointed out that CP Co believes their reported 5 cestplete is conservative since it includes tran.is, ecctingency, Ifeensing issues which are uncertain, and manual support for system turnover, Eeeley emphasized the licer. sing area, etating that CP Co was acving abend with a sunber of items without adequate EC imprt.
I then reiterated the need for ERC T-to restsee review of the Midland docket and emphasized that the primary pitfall
' ', q of the DC schedule review and priority assignment process was the inability of the Case toad Forecast Panel to a.ssess the adequacy of scope, particular3y for
Bood agreed that it was problematic for IRC to assure that i
priorities would be act based on both sebedule and a licenseable scope.
Lovelace the i pointed out that bulh would indicate a XIdland construction comple-g
-4 tico percentage in the seventies and gave the following exs=ples-frcss his =M*1 (developed by a California consultant for VPP58):
o I
43
~
5 Complete d
Bulk For 77.55 Cemesite Midla.no Cocerete 99 99 b$
large Pipe 75 91 t
u Small Pipe 58 58 I.
Tray 89 89 Conduit 69 51 y
Cable
$3 28 j
,.4 Terminations 32 20 3
m
~I Subsequently he pointed out that the I cceplete translates into mor.ths to go approximately as follows:
o y
! sM Bulk 5 ccenlete Months To Co H
i, Cable 53 24 Cahle 28 40 Terminations 32 33
[
p Terminations 20 47 Iovelace thought, however, that the CP Co estimaw of to go man-bours would imp 2y approxi=staly fcur years to go on construction.
)
A general discussien ensued in which Miller, Keeley, and Kline e==phasized the censervativeness of CP Ce nan-hcur estis tes as discussed above and.the fact that
- ame of o-
--T hou :
- /.II. L upeuded after Ucit 2 fuel lead of 7/63 It fM h
became clear frac the di:cussion that Iovelace did Let under:tand the zan-bour figures and CP Ce explained this in a detailed breakdown of 1:s.nual, Eco-Manual, Sabeentruet, a.3 Ccntincency man-boars.
CP Co pointed ou*. ths,t utilising or.ly
'4 4
=a :ud man-hourn and ce=parirg this to Bechtel and Subcentract manual manni 4 wuld lead to the conclusion that estimatea of r.anual nam-hours to go, curve:
~3 even thogh c'caserystive, are cessf ster. with approxir.htely three yes.rs to go cc2
~
cor.stru: tion fr.:n 'une cf 1980.
i'%
' 'b
- .9C h.s3 no further questiens and as eed to e2.saine the inforation in light cf CP Co's e xplarsti n of the data.
w*:-
isf;0
& &-m,
~
f E.hAWWW"W
?
1 hhhhh-h f
l WI,h*% $ $ $ $ $ Yh
$t?hhY$
h$
helhf5%$$tN&
N w ry m a.d**=r-M *c - c_ % x NDNE f TT.iC!?"ENT 10 f
Ikm SATr."! & I!!E::::1?I*, LL7/3;" CIT f
[
4 po.f,,.,.
TJ:"
er B
N "T* F "'_*: F.E"M JEB L g
Cre.fwny 12 3 s _
t, p.-tie!Yants
- e_
P / st s@n CP Co 3I E w
JV0ook CP Co g3 OCKeal 01' Oo i
- BMille r CP Co J'40 W.,
KFKline C1' Co I
TJOa21!.rin
- C1' Co gg-I t4 IPG.a;.
NRC File: C@
VHinvelnee f!
- Cor!" 7%
{
b'..h-n%.:u Case fead Foracart ":r.el Vinit. of 7/V)/80 yile c'. M.19 St'3JE*" :
~
Il - % =$3* Wl &
9 2 4 L:30 WMnier I
ZWCook E **1'7 NIU *.'@.I?O; ([,g:.:-
KFI)ir e A.tMolic=kef f
- 'f.cf.76 pt,y,....It'".,tUv,..0
[
C4'
.c g
~*1 t? '.. 01 -
te2ecor.s (Serial 9296), Darl Eood As a follov up te the subject zeeting and subsequct.:*evelace's preliminsr Iotelsee reiterated 4
reque:ted this call to d heus:that '!!ohr.d concrete, larca; pipa, He noted Midland vns clichtly previous state:r.ent:
a;;roximately 77% ce=r'.ete.
! tions area: with vere cen:ictent with a plat.
. Mis ticcest e :cerns were in the estle and tem nacos.:tructic v
_betind in conduit.
'*atility of engineerirC te cu;.;;rt i5
,, s..TcVer leadinCs.
bility to build 1.+ a 1
d(SKeeley and D3M111er stressed cur confidence in eccineering capa i l unit installation h
substantial Lackloc e.nd Jointed cut in :c.se detail that hirtor ca than 80.C::3 Wates on the job, particularly durinc 1979 when cab!c vss Tr.tlled at 6 reste pa ht proje:ted 115,000 ft/vcek dc=en:trate t a a
ft/veek for eicht vecks with e.c veek at.S!! iller al:o pointed cut that tray an d state of cocpletion d eenduit are a unit rates are reali: tic. definite factor in entle pullir.c and that based on Midland's i l Job. He al:o reinted j
in these area, cable pul'.inc rhould go far.ter than for a typ ca t ction and industry out trat usually other ite== th tr. cabic are controlling in eens ru r
averates =ay be =1:leadin;;.
y
'J it 2 Tre;;..ary re ults indi:ste fuel load dates of 5/8L forIn re:
g I
s i tions.
'.cvelsee stated that ha:
ar.d 11/S'- for tl nit I tsred tri..srily on cable and ter= r.ainc. Le
- take into accoua.t the factorsto how icvelace tied % co
- here discus:cd above.
N.
4 a.Mc cec ed to la ec=e e.r. fur'cr a:
- 41:o. teered to be lookin/* for an'ez'.rc=ely hir,
1 I.sv:1: ::
er Kr.:t urt wr m.N r.;-...
=cr.fider.ce dr.te with een:iderst!c conservati:=.
de:id.? to r.cet in Bethe:da inter in the week to address
, 3 s:
A 3 red cn this, it vu:in detail, ircludinc unit inctsllat on i
ar.- *.e-.ir.:t!:n:
g of. :: e jet s.J act oe;.;ed :A:.7: aver loadings.
a5 m
S M
eq awww.ua s m'= shim mass, u n M m gr k
i e. m e n..
c
=
a ac w.
- f
&%' ' 'G%Rwm't.m _ C.
- s., c.. {
a - ~; '
= ;'W s..
~
-M"2,
I ATT/.C'.!5 t!T 11 g&
i
?
00344 File: OliB5.11 G'
w oc3o
,m iiv.,-a. m
$0R$QEf!
D*?
9 Power A,ust n. 29e:
NN p./
w.
Mt pG:;1JJf D SATF"!T & 1.1CDO*';", Cfil.V:'T;7 IM VI';"! E! O ".A0E IAAD FiePFf/4 T l'A*;L'
$~M,,,
h Smse at MIr CD1AL: 9i, *e 6' '
' W II'10 5182.1./ 9850 TJS 68-89 8
pi,2 AP&1ler.kor *, P-!.3* e h
L JVCook/CWeeley, P-It-113 JARut6ers/V~.Jone:, Bechtel d.._
tt ERC inc. P-11-31PA Q
IBMiller, Midland (3)
FA (0t rial 9',73), TJSullivan.
A. ~-
- a fo1 Jew ur to the site vic;t of July P8 - ??,1%9of Sechtel met with Darl Ecod, hb At and VGJone:
2 1960.
w tretiller, and F:PC ine of Crx.suser WElovelare, ar.d B.'oner. (attorney) of the NPC 1r. Dethesd.a on Aurust 2,p.-
f.4 for After introdwette.g. Cine reviewed a table showing man-inur breakdowns yta Tha quantity W.%
ar.d the current schedule (see attmetament).
C i
sentia'ly W
Forece,t 5 Forecast /s,
increuer wer czplained and it was putated out that ur.it rate h
w,uld 3
hn14:nt, stegdy this year C.
Jeries and M::ler respont'ed that tt.ic numbe r tra.:Were ir some indication N the ese.
1 Le.
{
E O
and looked very good.
j catic length.
AC OF JUL.Y
,'7.
thr n 1.retanted the table entitled "TO O E1.F.*f*lCA1, VDRT.evycrater 1,ulldify w Tl." pcrtin, attr!butatle to security an1 the-It war. al:.o pointed ou
-g.
KJ in.
M 1961
- date. Miller k-br>th catic and terminatfor.s Is birJer than that experienced t.o di a,eus:< d.
h f fielency of sun-po!r ted out t:.at it.!s ezrerience to date is also without t e e g
tained pullir.g, t
k on the N
Eood pointed out met pretleu which have rertited in delays or rewor l
fram IPO Staff Job such ac soils, coctor. -st numbering, and chat.r.ez resultin A.
Ee questioned whet':er or not we should ple-
- >n accousmodating theseI poteted out, as e o
T review.
i 51tc recent had scw through an exte.sive review of the scope tyses of things in itse future.
d i
shutdown car at tlity and the plant ecrquter. current scope, accommodatinr.
cols the If ernset.!11ty of tt e ments over the next few years.
Exteriener" for variou:
i eJ "l'eee nt Vire anJ Cable Inst allat onX!1ler ear.:sined the diff C le.e then reviev Bechtel jotM sw! co mred thes to Pldla5J.norzul :ci arate unit incta]1st d insta11stler..
various work areas by drswis.r a site p!an.
IKtefpt*d. :
between ti.e Be est ained the of t he ene rast !cn was in the auxiliary $ 1dd.qg, r 41 DITschs':' v l
W ttWIaC rE
- ~.-S ers.1 t.~ ;
eral, tr.e cai4~gelline area of the latte pip.ej also N nte4 out that by cai e:r.lbr in ren i
i et= -
seiu-t ry.4r..r:ence forW,es rot ahe and L t., e va r ra bir t.sild'n. Mr ru-tained
. Ine,rst J.f'e wm asa
- : ur,,rru-o tr ut an.d tr:
. re in i ive.
, bri Ia n.d ui.. e. o.... i : i..,....... c, t ; o..
'f.f ;t** t:~ COW.2 0 *:
- p r p,L M 0y 0.:..* '
1 01 e, r-e
&p.
-wemwgcmyy L
l
.-gp
.T
=,
g g &.x p..W [ M %
M W~m
~ '.
-?W
_.jp5 I
'd.
ay-
~~t'::" h
~ m,A y
- r......g pn g =pg a ggy w.
e e
gs 49 gW'
.a L A m.n.cgmz.~m'*-
g-g.
pe-yf* K -
ygyw &ngym.s v-w 3-m 2'
00345 4
1 Jor.er then explained the instaJ 1stion curver for entle ar.d termination:. Bond-i and lovela e er; hnsised uricertelt.tle: sue!. at bicek walls, f*re protecticn. and ynt prot iar.: w!th ar.chors for cable troy:. Act!vitle: to reduce tha lais-t of
-re these uncertaint!es ware discusse4. Trnys. fr. the cat.e-str*adinr rcce are weli,d ased in additinn the anchors referre1 to are nr. lor #,er beirit used. Jorres indies'.-f g,# g
[
3aq be did not ez get this to bava a :ubstar.tial ing aet on cat;e pullir.c and ters..:.a-
-%g..~
tiocs.
',s Miller ther, cr;1ained the attacLaca examSe for terminations to go in the contre,1
"*35J r room.
'It. ! : addressed levelace'c concern ref.ardirac cor#.estion. Jooes pointed
, d$,
out that aanpower loadinr.: for terminations are usually not controlling.
- ~
'[&'y I
Followinc a short cr ah I asked how the res ses to Eisenhut's July 11 schedula
~
regnast Ictter would be handled. levelsea st.ated that he expected the Case load Foreca.st Panel (himself) would be visiting each applican* *s site by the end of the year, but did not know beyond that. He stated that several applicants aneared to be jockeying for position.
' -,j Eline ther reviewed dasir:n releare schadules and the build up of pull-ble back-
- g'.
lor.. He pointed out favorable progress since that reported at tha July site 3
vicit. Junes explained the overala process and the innovative special efforts N
whleh are roy!r.g off. Miller reiteratad that histories 11y, entle has not been contro111nr. and we think we can do even better since we are concentrating on this.
O
~
Miller al:o pointed out that the quality of work reachinr. the job site has improved due to the involvement of field ent.ineers in the design.
Iovelace then revievad his persteetive. He stated he still views Midland a
plant 77 - 78% ecx=;1ete but b:his.d ricnificantly in cable and terzie.ations (see Seri al 97.W. However he sees actuals of 166,L15 lineal feet / month for San
-O Onorra, Palo Verde, etc, and terzir.ations of 6,273 per mont!..
These plant
- ad O
forceast 205,Lo8 lineal feet / month and ter=1r.ations of 8.119 per month or w
N hi s torleally. He then looked at the VPTS etudy of October 1979. He then t:
A
, $r to reecr.elle this input with data CP Co proilded. He fir.ured we would really l
es not get into sustained tulk cabla pulling until we were about 305 complete and yT' we needed to restart the effort. He figurec we could get into sustained pullinc T
el about January 1961.
Be also lookad at Forceast 5 data and Bechtel's' reservations at that time about A
meeting inotallation rates. Jonen and Miller respor.ded that this concern had t
been acdressed and errrected. Therefore, this shculd not be a factor in evalus.-
f tions at this time.
ea Beverthelerc, lovel are :nt d all thi r ha t led hir to project,a prel!=;r.r.ry L'r.!! "'
9 fual load dette of 5/84 but the detailed data presented at this meeting on desi.n trorrecs, eaule and ter,sinations, manNver loading, and combined unit f
i installation concept would indleate that scoe adjustment te tLe preliminary date j
should be made.
CP Co su=.srized sen!n the utajor points surfortine our confider.ee in the 7/83 d
tir' t ? fuc! lead date.
The !!af te<t krplient 111ty of hi-torteal sverare wnit r,.t... to N : ar.: w-re t t. rat ed.
- he r :le9 of. cow war s'so revi.ved.
'** h, i
-@y ATTACHMENT
.4 wa
i dW%
~ ~,;~-
3 0034s s y s
M (g" '
Jurch, icvelace stated that tota 1uid ler.! t.;rs to 8
,n c u r er,rn ! r.r, ner break!nt, for Z caucus an l
luput he be:leved thst tte,H;dlar.4 coctined insta:lation p ar, w.
er over Indu-try everste put ! !r.c rs* * -
J g
for t"M !s! rovear.t u;1r.g a 60/k'k ru!* of t ri ct proj e t an en rostrstely He ?.at*d thht I e va:
h ecrr.Line J.
Jm.- tt.n i1
~
l a sinr,Je unit an d cor:rtor..
a two. unit split and thu-arriv-1 st 2 9 loo !?/m nt l er ri,r t r. le.; valve *.
i pointed out, after er n-!derable di-east.icn. a a6ther.at caon the 60/L y
He arrued that toe.
the metal NF" g rojected !!* diar o f ::
calculation.
5 ar.t 1
of JC6,00') II/socth for sing:e unit and cocrw rs,cheuld be If./,fv>r) II/ month r I
I sustair,ed pu:11a.r rate f
Jastallatic.n rate, fe, y
- 276.700 II/motb P6' i
106,000 a (O.L) (
u.G S
.he BPC ar> del would indleate 9C tovelace act.ed that this was correct so t' Then allowls.r twelve mos'hs to r
1983 cos;lete for cable pulling in Octoter 196:a Unit 2 3R0 projected fue2 Jo
~
- p Unit ? fuel loni yield:In.elace's projected sia months unit separatict..
i 3
Based or4 Unit I fuel load'!n Arrl! 19%.
f linE rata of 310,000 s
C CP Co then reiterated ecnfjdence in a sustained cable pul 7 reite
,j 4
II/ art th which 'esde us to a July 1983 Unit 2 fue 3 J eer.:Inr priority are T
g i
l based or. co::;erable lleensesble scot e.for giving Mid;and a relatively hir,he wa:
0 yi ecurpelltre ressen.
r3 at the site visit.
dates of i projectes The acetify then cor.:1uded with the ERO ctatinr, thkt the rJeud. r October 1981 and Arrli 19% for Lait ? and Volt I fuel Y
ereting air,utes.
be published in the
=3
~
N t
3,M
.s
%+.
a
'e t
t-
^
JB,td l
~
~ -
I ATTACHMENT z-g T r %
- m [ a SMWEGW "&
f~
.g
6mw &w=rmL'
,ggngm n wawke @ % eR=v>=~2 p
3r
.., w '..
~
,3tg 1;
00347
.[.
y Sy m A
l 1.-
e e =.o, wwss start or un raxmro
'{'"]
enom mT ran.
=
4 i
8177. 1979 6 JC:.T 1980
=
7, se x
g y-c k
,A+
f L
n o
'. 4e N
i
[
s K
s
~:
A d
w 3
4'
[
5g
. ~.
ggTACHML e,c xtM e?m d
@c!d.c;M.N
...c sx i$fk%v.F,4Q.
. _ " " " ~ ~ - -,.
^'
m
%m_,
u:es
~
mgnamassEgnRanarman=n.swwwea wd m&
g-:
p i
i-A a
12 I !" I! I i
i 00348 I
=[
it 5 1
l s!
I.
I.
I
(
I 3
a III 4
4 4
)r,, a.
=,
t r i m
gi';n'!
.sy, p
=
4
= ji r :-
s.
1 i
3 il i3 y
~j f,,:s 3
e
]
s 1
3 i
e i
453 dj$
dj2 Oj8 1
I.
I.
]
i a
l a
s-l 8
E e
5 l
9 E
J A
Qg I.
I.
j
- 3l I
s 4
s 3
}
f f.
s t-R 5
g v
I a :r g[
I g
f;1 I
3 W
s.
I 2
i 1!:1 <
s l
i I
l v
5 I
J ill!
I s'.
at
]1 i
1:.
s, 12::
5: n
~
It' 1551liasli11'.
- }
L ss k
}g 1
f I
liss-
==
O D
jj 4
I 2: 5 ;
a 2 1 ls
!!!!. ! E si H
15, i:.ii.;ll 2
EFU0 0E/
f 4
}
q e
w
=
.y v', _y
,wew- @BME~
~
w rP',
- *f i'
.x ">;g6%
~'
p p,.
_hym
__mIm '
EN W
AN,CE N i
To.c0 Et.r.CTptcAt voix As oF Jut.T 27. Ise0 gyg
.UOr71T_1,0, Q
- Wire & Cable (PVR & Conttol)
Total Plant 6,955.000 IJ s.
-Powe r 31oc k Sys t ems 6.100,000 1.F (Escludes Plant Security Evaporator f,1*
and Misc Tard Systema)
- Teruiaations
-Total Plant 217.300 IA t'NC10 L7.5 M *MS for Bulk Electrical Innta11ations 2,0$7,235 m 's (All Raceway, Wire & Cable & Terminations) 7 N
EMS for Power & Control Cable Pulling 8 7 3.880 M 's i
<O CTo-Co Dott Rate Available: 0.12 M's/LF g
To-Da t e Un it Rate: 0.09 Mi's/LF) l
- PJ3 for Te rminat ions 281.200 M 's (To-Go (; nit Rate Available: 0.95 M's/EA To-Pate Unit Este: 0.71 M 's/EA) g N
- Electrician m's Included in Forecast 6 for N
inpport to Startup Activitias 200.000 M 's eTotal Electrician M's to-Co for All Activities 2.774.000 E 's k
~
~
l 1
s t
g 2
1
~
s.
ATTACHMEMT j
/)..%..t non 37W/GD
' ' - M L't
-~
n _
-n - - _,. yx fg ce n-aw
.,f!*' ' y#
u
%b hf9' 5
R^b-w
_. w a. -- m5vr
_ _ _ - ~
g-Yo-Co Electrical Work as of July 27, 1980 (Contd) 00350 Imnurlow Ems Wire & Cable (N1 & Control) 330,000 Ly/ g January 1981 - July 1981 400,000 1.T/Mo July 1981 - January 1982 220,000 LF/ m I;
7)
January 1962 - July 1982 ll 15-Month Average:
310,000 tr/Mo Teruimations (W1 & Control) j 15,000 EA/m July 1981 - July 1932 l
l L
N I
r3 I
I 1
f a
l o
l a
J
.!!li N
h g
v e
h a
i 1
i t
G U /h5/>O IA)o W Al80 d3
.mem--
l
~h 4
3
].
i 00351 i
s
. r l
4 t
p 8
e 2 84 a
s as as 3
s i
I.I.
I.I.
I.
I.
In!
M 82 R.I 8
2 t
e
~-
u m b
[
l.
D8 I
L 8
r C
I 33
.3 3
3 n
j o
s g :
If II I
I s
li I
g ja ga a
2 32 j
aa 3
g 3) 5' Ef
[
i at at a
a
.]
B r as as e
s EI IR I
I E 61 3, 2:2533 E
g.:
ag g
3 4
[. : : "
g w
el s
)
- o a
~
i
=
3i
~
a 3
o j i.:a l;,}:a i
- .i.ts 2
a u
e a
AI a t.
El 11 E
Y V.
t.
~
3 q
o t
T.,.,,
.' '3 -.\\ '-
>r-I!
F I
)
t
~ - - - - - - - -___ __
h
.jP f
coffet4EERS POWER W AMDLAND UNff81 & 2 - JOS 7220 M DN
'Y
[-
q-L.
FORECAS 8 JU'Y #8' '4W h
fjgW g
POWED A CONTROL WmE &* CABLE f
6T TOTAL PLANT INSTALLATION f,
y, ;
g jf, C,"
Q l
i
-/
i AVG NSTAtiATION RATES LF/Mo 40eco 'Insinn '.9 tanto @ M*m I?*>w f
r j ;j FORECA8T Ql 75.aco 180.0o0 f % aos. mot ACTUAL i
(
p **""
l
)T.
q e
)
c -
(
)
1
/
.._ e pf t
mI
/
,,1 avser e ss t e,.
v l,L g
)
y*
r l
L*
u
/
I l/
l' o
./ p7/
l$f f
Y S
?
c N
rf(
I n -
-j- --
" ' ' g, x
I Y
q Og
/
f f, m
]
bb
/
, y
~
j g
)
/DSTAIL4Tro4) N) -
,6$
NNUh <)
hl'..
l 5
4 WJ/tdsA60 :
yy t5-u p
k o
e c agre E'
j 4
3 J
j V
I A
j Y
s' "db. ?.1 P Set J 7,484 rA
[h
%3(
.~
l J,j
~
l,
1.?
g I
n
'E
/
/
T002 1983 4
soi L
1980 1981
}
101" fD7f 0'
' 0 7 "-
we>t 1976
~~
AE
_,c.-
h LM 0o mappenn Maoras. gen somerstcal, runnrwartens f
icontre Room Te-co) 1 d
i e Appremieste number of power & control termimetteest 110.000 EA L
g e Terecast & eenhout requiremente (Direct Imber): 100.000 Mt's h
Average theit Rete 0.9 Pet's per terutnetten a
t I
e Scheduled time of performasco 24 Monthe
[
?:
e Instellettee Rete Fleet i
l ic
- 7,soo Ter= -
t Ma, 6200 Te e i
- 7.00 0 T._
?!
t stort cett 2 het imod 7-81 1-42 1-83 7 43 e appreatmete member of eaapeeer perforudes t=v=*mmetene in contrei anos arse:
to
.6200 Teve/h e 0.9tet/Tevu z 0.00*
26 E1eetetetens
=
~
,]
173 m/m
=
v
- Reductas recter for erore dietetbeeton, teeve11tes, i
l N
4 gehttcwra t edia8 Pose!bilities l
l First 16
{ ret seceed to j
-g i
73,,,
u n
l
'i e4
. I.
5 N
sY KTTACHMENT j
j:
ty tn
~
W 4,
g h tW.h hb en>>a o
'y
$l q'
t' a1 hl,
p
,82-k $'
.I 1I i
I y
- r W"
gb*
i t
eI
_.m. ~
sF
.L a,**..
7
= 3,
/
=2 p
~-
n4 u/
i O>
i "E
y ""1 5
L UD W.E H
y(,
C S
E S
'v A
a a
Y 0E n
N 2L u
2E e
A 7
'r y
R MCI rB e
O O N l
h JG a
A, R2 d
S E
E i,jE I il 8 l!!
W &D 1
li M
ll!l g'
O1 f
=
PSl T U Sf D 6
R RN EU N
=
MO O 5
UN C
/
MSA NL C
/
I OO L CIML
/
AT
/
. ME E
M
/
D E
f T~
S n
s O
M E
P X
t
,Gs E
,,D W
I i
2 M
Cte i
,A n M
,Te
,T m Ae.
U Y
.,u
>q
% v
't M
o f
?
a
=
o e
e l
s h
b
~'
3a y I
T h
~-
l
?:
I
?
i,
- j I i s;
o.
'lJ' fT3IjJr 4g[ f,
" ?
, }f ne
< fhij Fj
'i, y
f wO Q
M 8Me I
0 tu 6:
S o D e L u 3
0 c m4 8De4 s 2
t v1 E & e eT o0 a.
US ts a
1 sOR o oO:
< 2 l
M' s
F E n t L i
nY a
T r eE TA E
oNL T wU1 0
tL v
eF r
Af uCO 0
- s. 1 t
sn8 n tT' 1Ai sCW a i
rt Eo02., n=eI a.
A i
i oe i1 u
.s 4
c vU 1
i s'
3,, n S,a
'A.. C 1
E.
1 f
4 re M
d' 1
ep t
D p
P.C C
m U
/
a 0 E E
Y 2 1
N 2H d
A7C
- n P
S MB O OE J
CS g
A i~)
)ll R2 i l' D'
, li E
E I
p O1 R
.g
&L IggIll.
W E
PS
_4 SI N i
T RNG EUI S
MD r.
E UN D 1
SA NL T 1
OOf CM u
/
t O
c
/
m j
m c
[
/s 1 f I
o Eo t.N 1
Dt
, O
, E TH U a f
1 Rn l
t d
S t
T A tUL i
Co mr
,C Cw A
y T'
O.
f' 1
1
,A s
u,
H
- v NO
%7 s
J
[
~
0 9
- u. 3 '
, i g
k '
j
,q
~
EL2 l 1
- ~.
e, N1 e
=-.
n d.=.*
Q, 00356 g
w, f
C< *N.
~.g;;
Electrician Manhours w=
_ Distribution of To-Coy
- kJ Manhours -
- >=
hahours -
E_ lect ric ime_s
_411 Craf ts g
W rk Caterory 900
- .cd 138.590 d-conereee 4,600
.,gy?
441,960 549?
Civil S/C
'k,5k Sasetor 20,600 151,770
.s;t'-
Muh==ical Equipment 12,600 4x"r-n 2,031,460 rite.
Fiping 217,100 ff-g r.- -
C 695,340 Control & Instrumentacise 178,100 gn 179,580
"$.Q N
Electrical Equipment 2,030,000
<;3fn 2,057,235
'?
. :.m
{
Electrir.a1 Sviks 310.100
'h
. s, L244.26_5
- )
Distribut ablee 2,ne,000 7,940,200 c
..C' Tom.
}v
=~ b O
. p;
<.3
'R I
3d Kid 11ruf ite y
s/21/so N...
, ' i
$$5 f.
- r":
1 I
I 9
.w3 w A%d
^ ^ ^ ^ ~
cSQgg,3L&=WQ&fW~&
Y, n,
- x a _f>,Q A
a xy-m y'~;
,c.
E..
M b
cw_
MM v
p
....- n...-
rhy
. 5 ew"'
p.
C0357 M.
LEdi
-P.W;
- f..tt Distribution of To-Co Ele-t ries! Erk Activit tee p
.e, l
3;f8 Machours -
Manboers -
gg El ec t ric iana_
- Mi All Crafts 77,800 hg7 W rk Category 78,130
^M, Cable Tray & Supports N_
645,500 j
653,199 yf
)
Conduit & supports 87,500 jgge 48,773 thischeduled Cooduit E k.
i 812,800 a
823.884 Wire & Cable (Fr.C) 1 277,000
.1 :-
281,202 Sn Coenections (F&C)
W_m.
41,700 w.
N 42,354
.. w w Umscheduled wire gg 88,500 o
89,693_
MM Misc. tiec. Operations
- /;@
4jf 2,030,000 T@
2,057,235 Total ev t%q:
-i.'9:
o Ak N
l..'.b.
Midland FNO N
8/21/80 M
l b:
c, I
lS i
- g. 4 m.
49 p
LQ a
eg Eg.
' b'.
- T-
[.y'u.
ATTIsCHMENT p
- p..
fbb 1
r rtc UfJITED ST
,T
- E NT 12,,
,s NUCLEAR REGULATC yg
[
,. ; I,(
W ASHINototd. D. C. 20355
.f,h+g/
g y ?, ] p5.
SEP 161980
.[
/
pe c., i g~'EP22idM S
hk (h$ Nk.r.s d N5.
50-329/330 Decket Nos.:
n "....... c.
N [,6k.)Er_
8$.t.
APPLICANT:
Consumars Power Company
- C'
-u Midland Plz.nt, Units 1 and 2 TUS OF THE
%y,,
FACILITY:
MEETING ON LICENSING ~STA y
25, 1980 SUmARY OF AUGUST MIDLAND PLANT, Uii!TS 1 AND 2
SUBJECT:
t-K*5
?,
(the management personnel from Censumers Power Ccmpanyi M
applicant) and the NRC staff met in Bethesda, Mar 3 and to l docket review of 5
i On August 25, 1980 potential timing and methods for resuming the NRC's formaT ge i
f the the Midland Plant application.during wnich the need of preparations for e recognized.
review and the need for efficiencies in the review process wer June 13, 1980 1979' accident The Midland OL review has been suspended since the M at Three Mile Island, Unit 2.
The meeting duration was two hours.
l h d les On the basis of its latest (forecast !6) completed construc which reflect changes due to TMI-2 requirements, N ld delay the construction matters, the applicant noted that licensing couf the J
8 scheduled fuel load unless the NRC resumes full re Tnis is illustrated by the applicants enclosed prepc l
The applicant's schedule for Unit 2 calls for a July j
ictediately.
Foi Unit 1, the corre:ponding ing schedule.
load and December 1983 ccmercial operation.
)
The staff dates are December 1983 and July' 1984 (electrical and steam PEEeTand a j
visit by the NRC's Caseload forecast a.1963._r_esu.taTin a iTncing or r2asenac se egr
~
ll
'noted that the July _29,1980 3Wiion esddOTesTthe t
f6.lli d @ est3e.q_en Auous ment with tre applicant's crojected. cons.tucti_cn com T7T. e~I, EYr intanrs to t
PEneJ'sJffFcteT~o"ates are,__about_three months la6 t on tne basis of the preparc end process a itcensing senecTe chan lL ife the staff's overall werkload priorities and resources an
~
letion dates.
may net necessarily coincide with the construction co p ll use The applicant described a review plan em de termine l additienal prctecticn whether repeated er reopened staff reviews opo i
and noted that any procecures for the ccnduct of staff rev e
,to public health and safety.
i policy.
entircly to the NRC as a matter of NRC administrat ve l
I l
^
l l
1 I
SEP L 6 1'dU 00361 hs The NRC Director of NRR, Mr.' H. Denton, reviewed previous trial in the review pro-which have provided for.afficient use of staff rascurcesThis f its sys-utilized outsice consultants to supplement its internal reviews o NRC staff parti-c.ess.
ters to meet.the Commission's regulations, and in which.theThe appro cipated in the applicant's internal meetings.
hanna for the seismic qualification review by the NRC was als example of review efficiency.in particular, were most encour Mr. Selby of Consut.,ers Power participate in a similar approach for Midland. Compan t d that
- the success of this or any other approach would be doubtful unl through review tained core of staff reviewers can be assigned to l systems branches.
hi Mt. Denton also noted that current FSARs and PS l
d regu-explicit display of conformance to each of the Commission's ru es i
ursuant to lations of significance to safety.tation in the Midland FSAR upo 10 CFR S0.57(a)(1) and (2).
~
t Mn W l'
D. S. Hood, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3
, Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated l
cc: See next page L
l
(
G i
l l
i
-l
4 "TTf.C"l12MT 13 a
L PDR 50-329/330 OM. OL NSIC Docket Nos.
PRC System LBf4 Rdg MDuncan DHood OELD ACR5 (16) IE
- ELJordan, Mr. J. W. Cook Vice President JitTaylor. IE Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road 49201 Jackson, Michigan
Dear Mr. Cook:
ompletion Caseload Forecast Panel Es'timate of Constructio
~
Subject:
/
Schedule 1 sited the Midland the NRC Caseload Forecast Panel The meeting discussed On' April 19-21, 1983, s of October 1984 Plant to evaluate construction completion schedules in detail the basis for Consumer's revised estimaOn April 2,1983 t (Unit 2) and February 1985 (Unit 1).
tion progress.
ducted an extensive tour of both units to obser e construcof co The Panel has now completed its own evaluatio N
schedules for Hidland Plant, Units.1 & 2.
t of 1935 The Panel concludes that some months beyo d the second 1
i is the earliest date that completion of 6 to 9 months thereafter.
The I
Unit 1 is expected to be completed abocritical pathw f pipe supports, followed by execution of preoperati estimate of 14 months to completeis und The Panel believes that Consumer' i
preoperational and acceptance testing for bo t 24 months.
ightly optimistic, duration for two units s results in a completion date in the second Using a more realistic, but the Panel also believes that Consumer j
and Consumer's present sta ly account for large uncertainties However quarter of 1986.
cast does not realistic dl which must precede sta expected to add some months to Consumer's sche u e.is a ll bore pipe hangers and thet completion of reinspections of large and staa h testing the amount of rework resulting from this effort l
r
~*
r
~*~-..!*.~~~~~.~*
~.. ~ ~. ~
...... ~ ~ ~. ~ ~.
.~
. ~.... ~ ~ ~
l
... ~.......... ~..
~...~~~~~.~.Iu...
I
. ~ ~. ~ -...
L* # 4Cf e...
. ~.. ~.......
.a.~
.. ~
. ~ ~ ~..
Sua.mu t )I.,....~,...... i...................
........~....g.=~
uA m,, >l...........
FFICI AL. RE. CORD COPY i
ca. s.u ^. W"::;LC.M;'~ ni.
w. -e e s ~,y;e.;y.-
. w.. m.,
.x > p p.-::,....,.
- y..
.w:.:r.. e. g
,:gsp.a.,-..+%.i..5.p+ -J j' ~
c
.m y
lg,p,.i..1y:*g:.....s. y - y :n.
i
'. ut-J A..
am e.
w -~.
.m
.........v:: v. a.
n --....
..:...-. x.vk'&,g y$ :.,.%s-Q:.gy.t..g p,:..
..y
-"-~
,e.a m.q.e p +=...
- 1.. %:=. a.. z.'.-
- 1. * *. #.
r 3: mig' :_.
.^*e s
.?
.7 :.g y &
.~
The Panel's estimate includes no provision for delay a'shociat g.
- .r plant financing.
Sincerely,
..c i
Thomas M. Novak. Assistant Director for(icensing Divls' ion of Licensing Of Ice of Huclear Reactor Regulation
.. '.s. U,:'.'.,'... <
cc: See next page g
~.....
~
i iI
..k...~
g i.
m l
. r,
~
ii f
i f
- 1~
n, ',
- tJJ.A -
,:u-gL pe.d g
4QY W.
- T.A I
M 1).s11sl:.hs
)
pg & T
(
q
........xr...Jff a............ 4.,...
YK....../..
\\
AD/L QAH. ' RIII LBf4 LBf4 y,,
illove ce rrison4..
EKd................
mn:n >
5/....../
ensam
..b...... dim:
3 67..../83.....
Hou
. 5./...............
..I/.. 9............
,3 183 83 ca-i t
.................a
... 5 7..../........
l J 83 i
..................J we.re.
OFFICIAL' RECORD COPY.
eoe>
- oww no-sa sa:e =c k
~~
UNITED STATES
/.TTf.Cl!!'EUT 14
[
'**I+%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COf"
(
/
wasmNGTON. D. C. 20555 3 ;(af g
c p >Oq#
AUG 0 91963
\\.....
Mr. J. W. Cook Vice President Consumer Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road 49201 Jackson, Fichigan
Dear Mr. Cook:
Construc' ion Completion Schedule for Midland Midland Plant to evaluate
Subject:
the NRC staff visited the The meeting discussed the basis for2) an 19-21, 1983, On Aprilconstruction completion schedules. Consumer i
f both units On April 20, 1983, (Unit 1).
to observe construction progress.
to complete preoperational h
Recent The staff believes that your estimate of 14 mont s l optimistic.
and acceptance testing for both units is undu yh t this activity w experience for a single unit has indicated t astaff believes that yo l
h at least 24 months to complete. Moreover, t efore ncertainties in p
P and that the work that must precede start of critica r schedule.
j t d completion date is this can be expected to add some months to youa optimistic by at least a year.
tunity to meet Since the staff's visit, you have requested an oppor sly provided as well as i
with the staff to review the material prev ouits further consideration our to provide any additional information forWe also understand tha l
scheduling priorities between Units 1 and 2 in At your request, we will be scheduling this in this matter.
i A final staff position for Midland's construct on by Dow Chemical Company.
this further meeting.
i meeting in September. completion date will be developed follow n i
Sincerely, N
Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of LicensingOffice of Nuclea See next page cc:
7 iTT f.C'!"O!T ' O UNITED.5TATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION d
the Atomic Saf ety and Licensing Boar Before
)
50-329-OL
)
Docket Nos. 50-330-OL in the Matter of:
)
50-329-0M
)
50-330-OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
(Midland Plant,
)
AFFIDAVIT do depose and say:
being duly sworn, I Billie Garde, Citizens' Clinic f or Accoun-the I am Director of 1.
Accountability Project of the Covernment table Government
(" GAP").
l t ry Based on conversations with Nuclear Regu a o f
initial Ca seload 2.
the informed that I was Commission staf f d for October, Panel meeting f or Midland was requeste of CPCo and Forecast the request That meeting was cancelled at four months later."
(See Telecon 1982.
rescheduled to "three to attached and incorporated
[
5,
- 1983, Record dated October The meeting was rescheduled f or April 1.)
herein as Exhibit 1983 in Midland, Michigan.
that meeting 19-20, personally attend Although I did not in detail information 3.
1 have had the opportunity to review the public record and through the meeting made availabie on l
Information Act about the Freedom of l
GAP obtained under i
documents is attached these FOIA documents
("FOIA").
The digest of as Exhibit 2.
incorporated herein i
and I
i
A l
. s meet'ing Consumers Power Company revised its 4.
At that the Midland plants.
and completion schedule for estimated cost It announced a revised cost of $4.43 billion, up from $3.39 1984 for Unit 2, and and completion dates of October, billion,
February, 1985 for Unit I.
See meeting summary of April 20, 3.
1983, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit Panel this meeting the Case Load Forecast 5.
After completed its review of the schedule information provided it then forwarded a draft memo to the Of fice of It by Consumers.
Reaction Regulation ("NRR") by mid-May, 1983.
By May Nuclear draft of a letter Darl Hood prepared a handwritten 17, 1983, to be sent by Thomas Novak, Assistant Director of NRR, to James See Handwritten Novak Letter, Cook, Consumers' Vic e-P r e s id en t.
4.
attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit letter was typed copy of the same 6.
On May 25, 1983, a prepared for signature by Mr. Novak.
The concurrence blocks entire Caseload Forecast l'
on this draft letter indicate that including Darl Hood, J. Harrison, II Panel concurred in the letter, Ron Gardner and William Lovelace.
Staff urged its Upon information and belief the NRC 7.
its Safety and Licensing Board of attorney to inform the At om ic since they dif f ered substantially f rom schedule estimates Consumers' projected schedule.
8.
On June 3, 1983, the Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") sent the revised cost i'
indicating concern over a letter to Consumers l
Consumers announced in April and and schedule estimates that attached See June 3, ~198 3 -Dow Le t t er,
requesting documents.
l
\\
5.
and incorporated herein as Exhibit scheduled a public meeting on the Caseload 9.
The NRC 1983, at the Panel schedules estimates for June 23, Forecast This meeting was postponed Quality Inn in Midland, Michigan.
and rescheduled for July, 1983.
This tentatively-scheduled July meeting was later post-poned until August.
An August 9,
- 1983, public meeting was held in August.
No Novak to Consumers' Power Indicated that letter written by Mr.
no meeting has a public meeting would be held in September but been noticed up to this date.
Based on conversations with NRC Staf f and Consumers t
10.
soon af ter receiving the June 3, k
I understand that employees Consum er s' requested a meeting with NRC 1983 Dow letter, 1983 public meeting discuss the upcoming June 23, of f icials to in NRC and Consumer s' completion dates.
and the wide divergence information and belief Consumers' also wished to lobby to Upon Panel.
the members of the Caseload Forecast change Consumers told the NRC that information and belief Upon to figures were much less significant the Caseload Forecast I
the NRC than to Consumers.
The NRC simply used the figures tool whereas public release of the as a manpower management f inancial consequences completion dates would have s er,io u s f or Consumer s.
the NRC did not schedule information and belief 11.
Upon in which Mr. Novak of NRR, a meeting but instead held a telecon
n to that telephone Subsequent and other NRC staff participated.
s cancelled and rescheduled conversation the June public meeting wa for all docu-for August.
I made a FOIA request On July 11, 1983, See Panel April meeting.
12.
the Caseload Forecast ments related to incorporated herein as Exhibit 6.
attached and F01A request, the NRC F01A Office and was I contacted On August 8,
- 1983, d the f ollowing day.
the documents would be release I was informed informed that I picked up the documents.
On August 9, 1983, the NEC released all docu-
.,1 Ann Reed that by FOIA Of ficerca of the Novak letter, prepared by an early draft ments except Panel members.
the Caseload Forecast 9,1983, Mr. Novak released a letter h O
13.
On August Forecast which he revised the Caseload I'
in wrote to Consumers for the Midland plants.
Panel's estimated completion dates 1983 Novak letter t
i cited in the August 9, The completion dates estimates contained than the original 198.
12 months earlier the panel in May, e
are concurred in by Novak letter 9, 1983 Novak I
in the draft of the final, August the tone In addition, does not contain the the draft in that it from for letter dif f ers estimate includes no provision "The panel's statement:
financing."
plant delay associated with f uture l
.pp
'OA,'-
NUM
\\h
_ Billie P irner Garde l
Dwr;:t cf Ccis, bio rarf l
Subrenbod e..d c ci-M Mf c h/EV'
- 3/ x m:tth -
Wb Y>
- m
SAFETY Is LICENSING DEPAL.
g)
~
4 TELECON RECORD - DATE Oct.,, ou
'4...
.._Copi_e.s.to:..UFI:
Company PrNicipants MIMiller, IMB CP Co PSteptoe, IMB T J Sullivan NRC
'"JEBruntier D B:cd DBMiller BWMargugl RAWells RWHuston JAMooney ARMo11enk
[
Yik*e';I*IO505.18/0650 DMBud z ik/LSGib son /BLHarshe /DASommers touto to:
$N* f&
E* Independent Review Program -
,"~
- UBJECT
Caseload Forecasrt Panel Visit
%}W t
,a I
hkp. #
IISCUSSION:
th. 4.iw topics. I informed I colled Derl Hood to discuss the scheduling of meetingshia th d be to NRC by Oct 5.
He said th t he had. discussed the need f or a meeting w tI emphasized the importance of a f initiation of the program, particularly industry's commitment to com l
to cchedule a meeting.
tiens this year.
Panel visit on Nov 16 - 19, In respotYse to D Hood's earlier proposal of a Caseload Fo inappropriate:
F i
R CP Co needs to receive and review the forthcoming soils,.SSE.
d to initiate the work (c)
The soils work is controlling however CP Co has not been release d NRC.
and this activity should take precedence for both CP Co an (b) oduction rates.
It would be beneficial to get into the soils work to better assess pr (c) construction sequences, etc.
Forecast Panel assessment and l
The current sitiuation is not amenable to normal Casel Co and the key people who need
~
(d) i to do t#is work are currently fully occupied try ng initiate the soils remedial activities.
hat the 7/82 ify the ASLB this monthoils work and that the As an alternative I indicated that CP Co intends to notfuel load
' h precise date is indeterminate pending issuance of t estruction sequences, etc, based o h
l visit approximately tnd CP Co's detailed review of production rates, conCP Co would be p three months following initiation of soils remedefinite target fuel load da thove.
that time.
- e but agreed that the proposed appr dl He indicated the soils the Board might want a more definitive sche u e ff.
ceems responable and that he should discuss it within the Sta
~
Hood felt SSER should issue this week.
l
~
L------_____________.
EY.MIEIT 2 neg%'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COhme
.w.,
UNITED STATES
,8 WASHINGTON,0. C. 20655
.5 k*****
AUG 0 91983 bcket Hos. 50-329/330 Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Government Accountability Project Institute for Policy Studies IN RESPONSE REFER 1901 Que Street, N.W.
TO F01A-83-397 Washington, DC 20009
Dear Ms. Garde:
This is in response to your letter dated July ll,1983, in l
19, 1983 relating to the Caseload Forecast Panel meeting held April regarding the Midland Nuclear Power Plant.
These The documents listed on Appendix A are subject to your Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC.
The cost of On August 5,1983, you agreed to pay (reproduction charges.$0.05) per pag reproducing (documents is five cents Accordingly, the cost of reproducing 857 pages is You will be billed for this amount by our Division of Accounting.
10 CFR 9.14 a).
$42.85.
i Document 3 on the Appendix is being) withheld in its entirety fro of the Freedom of Information Act disclosure pursuant to exemption (5 (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(5) of the Comission's regulation r
This draft was prepared as part of the agency's deliberative process for developing an independent estimate of construction completion for resource Disclosure of this draft would impede the future frank and candid exchange of views between members of the NRC staff in planning purposes.
the development of these independent staff estimates of reactor constr t
P There are no reasonably segregable portions of this document.
completion.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Comission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary public interest.and Mr. Harold Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor R This denial may be appealed to the Comission's Executive Director forAs Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.
in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the I
l Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state o the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."
Si jrely,
\\
/
~ /
/M. Felton, Director
' / Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosures:
As stated L
Re: F0!A-83-397 APPENDIX A NOTICE Memo for Elinor G. Adensam from Darl S. Hood re:
OF MEETING AND TOUR BY CASELOAD 1.
4/6/83 AND 2 w/ enclosure (8 pages)
Handouts and Viewgraph Slides Remaining after preparation 2.
4/19/83 of meeting report (36 pages)
CASELOAD Draft Letter to J. W. Cook from Thom 3.
Undated (2pages)
CASELOAD Handwritten Note to J. Cook from T. Novak re:FO 4.
5/17/83 NRC TO MAKE OWN ESTIMATE ON Daily News Article by Paul Rau re:
5.
4/15/83 N-PLANT (1 page)
SOILS PIPE Midland Daily News Article by Lorie Shane re: HA 6.
4/20/83 (l
Activity Schedule (1 page) 7.
4/83 UTILITY MAY BE FAR FROM Dialy News Article by Paul Rau re:
NUCLEAR PLANT COMPLETION (1 page) 8.
6/29/83
SUMMARY
OF APIRL 19-21, 1983 CASELOAD I,,
Draft by Darl Hood re:
FORECAST PANEL MEETING w/ enclosures (7 pages) 1 9.
Undated
SUMMARY
OF APRIL 19-21, Draft by Darl Hood (Handwritten) re:1983 CASELO
- 10. 5/16/83 CASELOAD VISIT MEETING - MIDLAND
- 11. 4/19/83 Handwritten Notes re:
(13 pages) l 1
CLEARANCES Handwritten Note to G. Bachi from Darl Hood l
- 12. 4/24/83 l
Meeting Attendants (1 page)
- 13. 4/19/83 Handwritten List re:
Master Punch List Item Effect (7 pages)
- 14. 4/20&21/ Handwritten Notes re:
1983 l
CASELOAD PANEL PRESENTATION DATA (138 pages)
- 15. 4/20/83 TEST PROGRAM STATUS AND REVISION 12 - TE
- 16. 4/12/83 l
Re: FOIA-83-397 APPENDIX A MILESTONE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - PRELIMIN
- 17. 3.'22/83 (1 page)
MILESTONE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - BASE SC
- 18. 4/14/83 (1 page)
CLEARANCES Letter to J. W. Cook from T. M. Novak re:
BETWEEN CLASS 1F PANFl5 AND CABINETS (5 pages)
- 19. 6/21/83 Memo for Harold S. Bassett from Darrell G. Eisenhut r REQUEST FOR CASELOAD PANEL VISIT FOR MID
- 20. 9/22/82 (1 page)
Midland - List of Critical Systems -w/ chart (4 pages)
- 21. 4/19/83 April 1983 Appointment Calendar (1 page)
- 22. 4/83 Consumers Power Company - Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2,
- 23. 6/1/83
SUMMARY
OF APRIL 19-21, 1983 CASELOAD FORECAST re:
MEETING (111 pages)
Midland Daily News Article re: Utility May Be
- 24. 6/29/83 p
(3 pages)
DOW CHEMICAL TERMINATES STEAM g
Preliminary Notification re: CONTRACT WITH MIDLAND N
- 25. 7/15/83.
WORKER LAYOFF (1 page)
Preliminary Notification re:
- 26. 6/16/83 AUTHORIZATION OF FIRST MAJOR Preliminary Notification re: UNDERPINNING WORK UND
- 27. 6/21/83 RESUMPTION OF SAFETY-RELATED Preliminary Notification re:
I WELDING WORK ON HVAC SYSTEM (1 page)
- 28. 6/29/83 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 NRC CASE LOA
- 29. 4/19&21/
SUMMARY
AGENDA (1 page) 1983 CERTAIN HANDOUTS AT THE MEETING (30 pages)
- 30. 4/14/83 CONSTRUCTION Letter to J. G. Keppler from James W. Cook re:
- 31. 4/22/83 COMPLETION PROGRAM (18 pa,ges)
Ongoing Transmission Service Request to Kim Lovelac NEWS RELEASE - CPC0 MIDLAND CONST
- 32. 4/13/83 Ron Cook re:
(3pages)
DAILY HIGHLIGHT Memo to H. Denton et. al. from Darl Hood re:
w/ enclosed Press Release (5 pages)
- 33. 4/12/83
?
l
Re': F01A-83-397 APPENDIX A Memo for The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board for the Midland Plant, Unit 1 and 2 from Thomas M. N
- 34. 3/24/83 ANALYSIS COMPANY w/ enclosures (4 pages)
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EVALUA
- 35. 1/31/83 (199pages) 10/1/81 - Schedule for Site Visits (1 page) 36.
9/30/83 Midland Review - Volume 2, Number 13. Operations Moves
- 37. 3/22/83 Into Control Room Area (1 page,)
Midland Review - Volume 2, Number 12, Pier 9 Excavation Begins w/ attached Phase II of Aux. Bldg. Underpinning
- 38. 3/14/83 (2pages)
NOTICE Memo for Elinor G. Adensam from Ronald W. Hernan re OF MEETING - MIDLAND PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 (2 pages 39.
3/11/83 QUARTERLY
{
Letter to R. Gene Clark from A. R. Mollenkopf 40.
3/4/83 i
Daily News Article - by Paul Rau (1 page) 41, 2/23/83 NRC STAFF PROPOSES $120,000 FINE News Announcement 83-08 re:FOR QUALIT
- 42. 2/8/83 STATION (2 pages)
Hard Hat Protection Midland Review - Volume 2. Number 8 re:
43.
1/20/83 in Containment (2 pages)
PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF Notification of Enforcement Action re:
CIVIL PENALTY - $120,000 (1 page) 44.
2/3/83 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGR News Announcement 83-03 re:
45.
1/29/83 (1 page)
Inspection Letter to James W. Cook from C. J. Paperiello re:
46.
1/12/83 Report w/ enclosure (7 pages)
Daily News Article re: Test of Emergency Plans at N-Pla i
Postponed by Paul Rau w/a'ttached articles (3 pages) 47, 12/28/82 Articles from the Midland l
Note to Darl Hood from Ron Cook re:
Daily News w/ attachments (6 pages) 48.
12/3/82 Article - High Court to Consider Waste Disposal Influence o Licensing w/ attachments (3 pages).
49.
11/29/82
R;: FOIA-83-397 APPENDIX A Midlarid Reactor - Volume 7. Number 8 - Various Articles
- 67. 8/82 (8pages)
Midland Review - Volume 1. Number 39 - Operating License
- 68. B/19/82 Hearing Contentions Established (1 page) enclosed Letter to R. Gene Clark from A. R. Mollenkopf re:
El-254 " Quarterly Progress Report on Status of Reactor
- 69. 8/13/82 Construction" (2 pages)
CONSTRUCTION HALT REQUESTED Preliminary Notification re:
PENDING NRC INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS (1 page) 70.
6/28/82 Articles'from the Note to Darl Hood from Ron Cook re:
71.
5/10/82 Midland Daily News (2 pages)
Computer Printout-Revision 12 - Planning Schedule (52
- 72. Undated t
l l
l l
l l
~
i
~
Re: F01A-83-397
_ APPENDIX A Midland Review,- Volume 2. Number 5 - Construction of
- 50. 12/22/82 Pier 12 East Initated (1 page)
Midland Review - Voluem 2, Number 2 - Turnover Status
- 51. 12/3/82 (1 page)
MAJOR REDUCTION IN SAFETY-Preliminary Notification re:
l 52.
12/3/82 RELATED WORK (3 pages)
~
Completion Plan at the Midland Nuclear Plant 53.
12/3/82 Draft re:
(2pages)
Underpinning Work Delays S.cheduling by Lorie
- 54. 11/17/82 Article re:
Shane (2 pages)
Daily Highlight Memo for H. Denton et. al. from Darl Hood re:
- 55. 11/10/82 w/ enclosed Press Release (5 pages)
Potential 50.55(e) Report -
Preliminary Notification re:
56.
10/29/82 Improper Cables (1 page)
Resumption of the Mididn'd Nuclear News Announcement 82-84 re: Power Station Operating Lic I
57.
10/26/82 l
(1 page)
Midland Reactor - Various Articles (10 pages) 58.
9/82 Independent Review Program - Caseload Telecon Record re:
59.
10/5/82 Forecast Panel Visit (1 page)
Stop Work Order on Remedial Preliminary (Notification re:
60.
9/27/82 Soils Work 1 page)
Defective Radiation Monitoring
- 61. 9/20/82 Preliminary Notification re:
t,
~
Modules (1 page)
Deficiencies in Primary IE Information Notice No. 82-40:
Containment Electrical Penetration Assemblies (4 pages)
- 62. 9/22/S2 Fire Memo for Thomas M. Novak from Ronald W. Hernan re:
Protection Site Survey - Midland Plant (3 pages)
- 63. 9/17/82 Midland Review - Volume 1, Number 39.- Operating License Hearing Contentions EstabTished (1 page)
- 64. 8/19/82 Midland Review - Volume 1, Number 40 - Following Procedure Properly - Goal for All Workers (1 page)
- 65. 8/27/82 Midland Review - Volume 1, Number 41, Saginaw/ Bay Count Moving Toward Full Siren System Approval (1 page)
- 66. 9/2/82 LI
EXilIBIT 3 UNITED STATES
,8[),y %
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI 7,
w A:HINGTON, D. C. 20555 c,g,
June 1, 1983
%; '.O.. #
Docket Hos. 50-329/330 Consumers' Power Company APPLICANT:
r Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 FACILITY:
SUMMARY
OF APRIL 19-21,1983 CASELOAD FORECAST
SUBJECT:
- PANEL MEETING members of the NRC-Caseload Forecast Pane tion with Consumers Power Company (CPCo) and 8echtel to review cons On April 19 and 21, 1983, 18,1983 and announced completion schedules which CPCo completed FebruaryOn April 20,1983 the for Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
The purpose of April 12,1983 Panel toured the plant to. observe corstruction progress.
l of the meeting and tour is to provide for an assessment by the shows some of construction completion. is the meeting and tour agenda.
the slides used during CPCO,s presentations.
CPCO's previous and revised estimates are:
Difference (Mos.)
_/83 Estimate _
4 p
7/80 Estimate _
14 10/84 13 Unit 2 7/83 2/85 Unit 1 12/83 Overall plant completion is estimated by CPCo to be about 83 4%.
engineering is about 76% complete; design 94%; and underpin CPCo finds there are three separate critical pat l!
underpinning, and (3) the licensing / hearing pathway.
completion:
l' '
Aboveground Pathway _
i This pathway is primarily based upon rework of la have zero and installation of mirror type pipe insulation also presently supports.
or negative schedule float.
9 "e
notes CPCO's intent to reinspect all installed A letter of March 29,1983, safety related pipe supports without regard to the time of and certification of inspection personnel, QA program revisions, and other or turnover.
support activities would be in p1&ce in time to commence reinspectio 11,1983.
during(the week of Aprilabout 50 inspectors) and expects to complete han Only two inspectors had been certified as of AprilThe hange teams in June 1983.
and had started hanger inspections. critical path for the " Construction CPCo's letters of January 10 and April 6,1983 (and subsequently on April 22,1983)..
CPCo noted that 544 of 850 total subsystems (64%) h accepted.
i
)
, open items such as design changes, and corrective act on Forty-five percent for both units provides a total duration of 14 months.About 4% of the total of of the systems have been initially checked out.
31, 1983. Of these 683 tests, CPCo 683 tests have been completed as of March plans to complete 95% of the 268 preoperational tests and.128 accepta tests prior to the Unit 2 fuel load.havebeencompleted(twoareinprogr
~
The testing program for about 134 completed and none are in progress.
The present schedule I
systems were noted to be constrained by the CCP. assumes li
~
both units.
At least seven 50.55(e) reports are considered by CPCo to have some for schedule impact in that reviews and tests are not complete and cann fully assessed at this time. These seven are:
l Subject Management Corrective 50.55(e) Report No. Action Report (MCAR) No.
(
High-energy line break 40 1.
80-04 analysis (HELBA) pipe whip restraints Low alloy quenched and 458 2.
80-09 tempered bolting Design of steel embedments 63 3.
82-12 that use tension bars and shear lugs Deficiencies of Limitorque 46 4.
81-01 valve operators Deficiencies in electrical 82'-01 55 components associated with 5.
main steam isolation valve actuators, and non-safety related equipment wired as Class 1E l
l N
4
Safety related equipment 59 cooled by non-safety 82-07 6.
related'HVAC system Clearances between 67 electrical control 83-02 7.
cabinets and panels h
_ Auxiliary Building Underpinnino Pat way_
b 13, 1983, Six of the 57 undprpinning piers have been installed since Dec The construction sequence and a pier load test (pier W-11) was in progress.
to gain early access will utilize an existing Utility Access Tunnel (UAT)Therevisedconstru beneath the southern corners of the Control Tower.s l tion forecasts.
l after
'CPC0's' schedule assumes NRC will approve' loading of fue in advance of EPA and transfer of the EPA load to the permanent wall (i.e.
'i FIVP soil consolidation beneath the wall; pier lockoff and gro l stiffening at replacing of backfill beneath EPA and FIVP; and structu.raCPCo e critical elevation 659 feet).
willlbe completed by late January 1986.
Licensing / Hearing Pathway _
i d "0L" l
CPCo considers that completion of the present satis "0M" he CPCo's hearing is also critical to the new Unit 2 fuel load estimate.
f estimated need dates for the hearing are:
August 1,1983 Complete "0M" hearing session Mid October 1983
~
f Initial Decision on "0M" matters Mid May 1984 Completion of "0L" hearing session Early July 1984 l
Initial Decision on "0L" matters Staff Conclusions _
h eeting The Caseload Panel noted that the information provided dur ther reviewed before and observations made during the site tour would be fur the Panel's completion estimates are reached.
I y/v '
M_Darl Hood, proj ct Manager
.w Licensing Branch No. 4 Divi,sion of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page
EXilIPIT 4 go - 7 2 f[.7,7 0 PM OL f
- W1 p c,v/r
)p'2:
CnJ.a 9~~r fa ccA if c en c %) 4t.
7 y
.24 st?c G.,,.k
'P~
t-pn 9.~;fi9.2/,i1v fa p.44 swn cha
,4 a e w.r~c.,
m.
7-A A j.a. i 4x;.r,zs
+
WL A a x.g o.:% n n(va z)
./g &
0s42JL 0, t 1 V.7 24 Lt d
f%'~.3 /9fr r~( U A I).,
7 a ~aze k ru
,.x.c n a t,y,.
a r-
% ra k T+.1
~,
~'s.
,c m.s.t ;.~4Ls.y n;.tL,.qq.41 tu.
7L fa e~w.zu - ~z.r.
pp.zt na m
A 7A d d /J 74> 9 c-s,7 y\\
g <f 8 1 1r c.
[ ;\\_.? 9 2 m _ e - d. M _ P +R > ^ W r:1 %
5 J-~
wu t.~.-
ag &.~nA p 4 y, 4 e </ e, m - ~ L e. s
,,z
.e A r.,..
L NJl W.s,1.,1 of l y J k b I JL G$~~d JAk $4/
)
l L j,
y. C,, - < g,... I a J a -...,. n QGSyh14 J a l
.g[ fs. Jnl,7 ej,R.',C/
7'~.ru -, / p n 4 O A J. J< 4 i /-4,,
1 Wff J \\
al rJ
-zs~ ~ r 2k.
ili < m.ns-.4,4:,4 p u.s -,LCr
/
o tn L f.<c,
.A l ){. ej,Tr'~*.4,4 4 (m 5v A mlh,< ~
- e. ey l
p
, ef i 1 ec.
-ps~<<,,, ?%d'~4 J r 1
JA.L 2k. s.~t
.i.,L:.
pu u ns b..
n,' s cu n, a. w -
,d,. Ah ey#.&% a-J,.~A Anr p
.h.y ~,234.
.7U~. N r.,
e,.,4 -, L >,y e J 4 c / j. u 4.A,7..j.,
/
,.j: s
' 'j o EXMISIT'.5 T H E D OW C H E IVil C AL C O M P A June 3, 1983
~
Mr. James Cook Vice PresidentProjects, Engineering and Construction C nsumers Power Company 1945 West Parnell Road 49201 Jackson, Michigan
Dear Mr. Cook:
f Consumers Power Company's announcement o of deep 1983 was, and still is, a shock and a sourceAlth As you might expect, uran ~
April 11, ration will not now
, concern to Dow.ces that commercial operation of u
.The ultimate if then.
1985 at the earliest,ial Steam operationt l assumption of occur until August, ability of Consumers to meet the Commerc d!
was a fund, amen a Moreover, you have advised that thesed by 31, 1984 f
deadline of December Consumers /Dow Agreement. estimated cost of the project has in Dow has been and is in In light of these disturbing developments,-
In order to f the project.
d evaluating our alternatives,infor the process of a thorough re. view o assist us in making such a review anwe would like yo h
pedited basis and accordingly ask that the reques attached schedule.
June 20, 1983.
available to us, if at all possible by I
Sincerely,
~
R. A. Gaska, ManagerInorganic Chemicals / Energy & Utilit es i
47 Building kjl
E SCHEDULE
,. _.. _. rs and by Bechtel for Forecasts 1 through 7 prepared by Consumeing forecast annou 1.
Consumers Power Company, and the replann to these forecasts, in April, 1983, including all adjustmentssts and plant comple-which primarily relate _ to total plant co tion projections.
January 1, 1977 by the All reports'or studies prepared since n the Midland Project 2)
Consumers Power Company Planning Group o t cost and scheduling.
]a primarily related to total plan y
l repared since January k
All monthly or other. periodic reports pl ting to plant cost 3) li 1, 1977 by Ecchtel for Consumers Power re an conformance and scheduling, inspections, rework, no -tings between Bechte I
Midland Project and,all minutes of mee bjects.
and Consumers dealing with these su 1
Bechtel, or U. S.
r All reports prepared by Consumers Powe,d cause o'f soils-r 4)
Testing concerning the discovery an ienced during plant and other CFR 50.55(e) problens exper construction.
EX:t10IT. 5
~
7.',
{
T H E D OW C i4 E Nil C AL C O M P A i
June 3, 1983 I
Mr. James Cook Vice PresidentProjects, Engineering and Construction C nsumers Power Company 1945 West Parnell Road 49201 Jacksoh, Michigan i
Dear Mr. Cook:
y's announcement of As you might expect, Consumers Power compa d a source of deep uran-April 11, 1983
, concern to Dow.ces that commercial operation o ration will not now
.The ultimate if then.
1985 at the earliest, l Steam operation i
tal assiumption of the l
occur until August, ability of Consumers to meet the Commerc a was a fundAmen Moreover, you have advised that thed.by ove J
31, 1984 3
deadline of December Consumers /Dow Agreement. estimated cost of the project has i In light of these disturbing develophents,-
In' order to h
roject.
d evaluating our alternatives,infor the process of a thorough review of t e p assist us in making such a review anwe would like yo expedited basis and accordingly ask that the requesteavail attached schedule.
20, 1983.
Sincerely,
,h/
R. A. Gaska, Manager 2norganic chemicals / Energy & Utilities, 47 Building kjl aa we w,
-%v~
-w
---r
E X!!IM T 6 7
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT (202)234 9382 Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street. N.W.. Washington, D.C. 20009
(.
July 11, 1983 Director Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 20555 Washington, D.C.
To Whom It May Concerns 5 U.S.C. 5552, the
)
Purstant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, Go titute for Policy Studies 1
requests copies of any and all agency records and i tes, diaries, logs, not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, m nu i
eports, procedures, calendars, tapes, transcripts, sumaries, interv ew rin h
charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, stubooks i
and other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status retion with the Case Ioad other records relevant to and/or generated in connecding the construction of t f
19, 1983 regar i
d Forecast Panel Meeting held AprilThis includes all items above regarding prep l
t'to the meeting.
d Midland Nuclear Power Plant.for the meeting, the meeting it self,and C
d Specifically, GAP requests all the documents (ad resffice of Inspection a Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations (NRR) the OE tion and Enforcement, unreleased--NRC analysis and Consu$ers Power Company regarding the CaseTh of the Consumers proposals, as well as any notes, NRC.
generated by Consumers Power contacts with the l
l se provide all sur-If any records have been destroyed and/or removed, p eai t of all records rounding records, including but not limited to a l s f the action (s) taken, been or are destroyed and/or removed, a description oide policies and/or relevant date(s), individual, office and/or agency-w l personnel involved with the action (s), and any and all records relevan tion (s).
with, and/or issued in order to implement the ac I
m t
e- -
. July 11, 1983 Director of Administration C
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission GAP requests that fees be waived, because " fin' ding ths
)
The Government Accountability Project is a non-profit, non-partisan public Through Legal interest organization concerned with honest and open government.
representation,' advice, national conferences, films, publications and public outreach, the Project promotes whistleblowers as agents of government account-GAP requests the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protect public safety and ability.
health at nuclear power plants.
For any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide an index itemizing and describing the documents grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is releva documents withheld.
This index is required to the document or portion of the document withheld.820 (D.C.Cir. 1973), cert. denied, under Vauchn v. Rosen_ (I), 484 F.2d 415 U.S. 977 (1974).
We look forward to your response to this request within ten days.
Yours truly,
(
BILLIE PIRNER GARDE Director, Citizens Clinic for Accountable Government BPG/mv e
J
00LKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-13 SEP 22 p2:42 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing @oard f SECRf. tai, uuGntdInc $ Sggyg(;~
BRANCH Docket Nos. 50-329-OL
)
50-330-OL In the Matter of:
)
50-329-OM
)
50-330-OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
)
(Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
__)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE _
1 I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing sunni.m,ne.
stamirin' Mn*4nn en of Intervenor Barbarn Memorandum in Support were Litimate Dow Issues 1983, to:
da f sentember _,
mailed, proper postage prepaid, this m y o l
Frank J. Felley Carles Bechtoefer, Esq.
Attorney General State cf Michigan Stenrd H. Freeman Administrative Judge Assistant Attorney General Atcmic Safety and Licesing Board Envirmmental Protection Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Otm1 mission Washingtcn, D. C. 20555 525 W. Ottawa Street, 720 Iaw Building 48913 Lansing, Michigan Dr. Jerry Harbour
- m. Mary Sirv lair Administrative Judge Atcrnic Safety and Licesing Board 5711 Sumerset Street 48640 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ommission Midland, Michigan Ashington, D. C. 20555
- Ms. Barbara Stamiris
- Dr. Frederick P. Cowan 5795 N. River 48623 Freeland, Michigan Administrative Judge 6152 N. Verde Trail, Apt. B-125
- Wendell H. Marshall, President 33433 Boca Raton, Florida Mapletcn Intervenors
- Jams E. Brunner, Esq.
RFD 10 48640 Consuners Power Ctmpany Midland, Michigan 212 West Michigan Avenue
- Docketing and Service rection 49201 l
Jacksco, Michigan U.S. Nuclear Pegulatory Ccnmission Washington, D. C. 20555
a ** Philip Steptoe Isham, Li'ncoln and Beale Wron M. Cherry, P.C.
Cou'nselora at Law Peter Flynn, P.C.
One First National Plaza Cherzy & Flynn Three First National Plaza Forty-Second FloorIllinois 60603
- Chicago, Suite 3700 Oticago, Illinois 60602
- Atcznic Safety ard I1 censing Board U.S. Nuclear mgulatcry Ctmmission 20555 Washington, D. C.
- Atcruic Safety and Licensing 4 peal Panel U.S. Nuclear Begulatmy Ccmn!.asicn Washingtcn, D. C. 20555 Steve J. Gadler, P.C.
2120 Carter Avenue St. Paul, m 55108
- Frederick C. Willimus, Esq.
Ishan, Lincoln & Beale 1120 Connecticut Averme, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 l
- Wi.llian D. Paton, Esquire Office of Executive Imgal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory (bunissicn 20555 Ittshington, D. C.
/
(L/
l
(/L{,,
"Y 'NE BERNABE1 l
- Delivered through the NRC internal mails.
1 Hand Delivered 1
l
_