ML20076M068

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Updated Responses to First Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence
ML20076M068
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 07/13/1983
From: Bell N
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES (FORMERLY COALITION
To:
Shared Package
ML20076M062 List:
References
ISSUANCES-CPA, NUDOCS 8307200134
Download: ML20076M068 (4)
v • d • e


Text

.-

. - . ._ ._ a . . - _ - - . . . . -- . . - --

' ' ' pp ,y.  ;

n. . 293 J. ..MWiq~

'.,YbaQA2 s COr'mypo.an g E* T' D. ' '.g (D^D'

. %7 ' .u.m s

e

,_4 MM , '

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA f ..& $tt > . gd% "?

j;.g-;g -

t M

/-[y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g.,;;.y.;fy y "'y IQ ,e,r a

B E F O .R. E _ T_ H _E _ _A T_ O_ M _I C_ _S

____ _ _ __ _ _ ___A

_ F_ _E T_ _Y _ _A jut'yy%e _N D _ L_d _I C E_ N t S _I N G_ _ B_

In the Matter of )

,~

d $s),. %, .:w * %3 e

~

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM ) Docket No. 50[4[OChN b et. a. )

T.N Y

(WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 1)

) 'jl Wh{h-hh MQi

) *

.. -9 a,W. ..g r 4 .s.y,v:,3,.,u.m 3 .

. . ,' u .?

$. p *.w

-~

, v.

~

m r.g,y;,T ,,,e"- .;$p,'

INTERVENOR'S UPDATED RESPONSES TO NRC-ST6FF'S FIRST SET OFAs-gy' 'u.

~~~~

s '

"5EYEEEUGAT6EEE5[lULk ------- 15[~5955.

- - - - ~ ~h.SY-

"f.

.,.g gLg

6, e 'r &

INTERROGATORY 7: Is it your contention that therechaagn%.gf..p Mk ..tl been a slowing in growth op4 .

' rate of electric power requirementsfin b y g'O ^'-

the Pacific Northwest?m, #

4&'@.,i c-[..J g, RESPONSE: No.

^

-Intervenor hereby

- gsd L. _ M..hp(

retracts th. e.y ires...ponse_

. .- . n . m. . p tyr ;v+i e 4 provided on May 24, 1983.. m.:49.,x yw 2:$ .

.~..;. e :

. ..g$Byf.hgg,

[^; .%p g [

g,p

. 4c0,. x y.o v. .. , ,,. - -

yj INTERROGATORY 8: Is.it your contention that ~

of electric power requirements in the Pacificthegrowthtratel.Fe(nf, Northwes'tih'a" stopped or will stop completely before 19917 Yrd: lim 21% '{%"f n

RESPONSE: No. ,s M

M '. ';.*w[u.;,t%.g. .,4l,

.:l%

&Q; >; 3 f.kpg

& - j'$$ l INTERROGATORY 10(b): If your answer to

. - gu .>nyl?hl'!y$5 aw 10(a) is in the affirmative, set forth and explain. fully \thag M fE InterrogatoryfNoggjgp factual basis or legal' li?iIauthority for your statement.. CM @ g$5k.kf[ k

_' , , RESPONSEf e

S ;Interveno.r, hereby retracts the ~ ? !.%fE response] provided.,, plLg Y &

, .c. :.fMM1 .

on May 24, 1983..'E 9??% %

,X%* W  ?.IPil T W- g '# Q g@ k tQ N R h The factual basesildentifi'ed by the intervenor at t'M,[:-14'f%%ki M cre: the " Northwest Conservation a.1d Electric Power Plan", VoltimeIMM

.u mmn${aihis dat I,

. - : .i.:..'ipMy;Mk M-April 27, 1983 by the Northwest Power Planning Council,CTable%46 6-1, the " Analysis of

. 4 Mn'Mfi$

Alternatives Related to WNP-3", Mayj26, g g,7 4 mgpiN"'CF 1983 by the Bonneuille Power Adminstration, the

" M o'd e l E l e1 c' o,m t r i,w4.B cg s c--sN_ 9x,9.4.-

Power and Conservation Plan for the Pacific Northwest", November $1$,7gl'i /

198P by the r.~; $ L Q E

  • Northwest Conservation Act Coalition (page 28)land N @ '

conversations with Jim W G .2.

Lazar, energy 8307200134 030713 economist (317 E. 17th N D N PDR ADOCK 05000460 :5Y3-M-~**/'.

i+

~

Q PDR -

,1.rau w .

_ , _ .- 7. n ,-

g _ ._ _- - - - - - . - - - _ - - - - - - _ ~- - - - -..- - ~ - - _ _ .

2A%y q

~?g .r. g.)

s.9%
.~ - r 5%

gt >

t

.1 @3_ ..,. i 01ynpis, WA 98501) on or about June 10, 1983. .

. . ,: e .y

-g q ;..;g;qbE'5ff,;y The legal basis identified by the intervenor to date is ALAB-.722c c g

'~ ' S h ygE1

.- 3 f* he j

!NTERROGATORY 11(b): If, your answer to Interrogatory No.% ,f ilta) is in the affirmative, factual basis or legal authority for this contention.

set forth and explain fully the , , . .~f.)G

.f RESpCNSE:

N._,

ALAB-722 establishes that the " ultimate ' good: ,

.jQ . .?

cause* determination la expected to encompass a Judgement-about g 3

.. - i *M why the plant should,be completed end-is not to rest solely:lupon e

'%% di judgement as the applicant's fault for delay", "wheth.or; good i cause exists to extend the constru'e tion completion date"..an'dSthat.

n$$.%f l

--- ~

"a ;udgement must-still be made as to whether ' continued Sg" [g  ;

lii $ , ~

construction should nonetheless be allowed." The Appeals,}Boird' d also discusses the temporary lack of need for power andulacksof f!2tWfM financing as fac. tors which cause delay with Ui$Mh' v a'l i d .b s s i n e s s t 1

.Y$rj.'~

purposes. Intervenor sees a distinction between a " deferral"#of t 7 , ll(jQ),5",'

need and a temporary lack of need or slowing of growth rateP wit '

.. a 93 the former a more suitable description of the instant ca..e\.,h.y- ww .~ ~

~

4.g3 Wi..s INTERROGATORY 12: (a) Do you claim that the actuaQ@deferra in the need for . power.in the Northwest United StateaMoes:Jno.

Justify deferring construction of WNp-17 f.?g (b) Explain fully,your answer to Interrogatory No.712C

~

(d If your answer to Interrogatory No. 12(a)~ils3kh' affirm 6tive, state relevance of your notDthe statement $thd

" petitioner...does belive the power from WNp-1 will(eOeryb"et needed",to your claim.that need for power in the NorthwestM' States does not Justify deferring construction of WNp-1.~^$.UnitA l

o $i%  !

RESpDNSE: (a) Yes. . (b) The " deferral of need". Justifies;-

DMQ ,

g cancel'.etion of the project not a deferral of constructi n

. , /:f %%.}

f there s never a need for the plant, the plant should'be h

'.t m.

% t. t . ,

+-

cancelled, not deferred, because a p" plant's principle purpose g a,.,,7.::"

.J,a 4W,$$

e to provide needed electricity. The basis for the NRC's decision

, .x-p -R g ,

r i~ . .a l, A m to grEnt WNp-l a 1yj Construction permi.t has proven to be-tota . .m -

{ a.,'Qd,j

- N" j,@$kN. 1

_ _ _ _ _ . __ ._ MEd565$15h

_- .E . . . a. - ._..__..1.-_-

[ . D._.. _ .. .m. _ _ g. . _

1_. .,jd,75%];

ww

> *  ;'kfQ W l DM hq.- ~3)*' .

.w F u

- w 4.;v. g

, IkdytC 'c without validity. Furthermore,

. continued construction of WNP.Q $.g @'g .

.. .ew. i might bankrupt the region.

w W.a- g +2t

., g&

m.,g$g.b'.dy

> l- G}YlA'i

.+:H

  • NTERROGATORY 13: What, is the factual basis form;&f.hy?&g*! yourg statent.nt that " Petitioner...does not UNP-1 will ever be needed"?

believe the power.fron <

,. g ;;;,,g Q 4 gg

./pp RESPONSE: The " Northwest Conservation and Electric Poweri

\ .q:f j Plan", Volune I, April 27, 1983 by the Northwest Power Planningy _d

!. - ' a- o!cp

  • Council, Table 6-1, and the "Model. Electric Powerj an;d- j --

" s#if ,.

Conservation Plan for the Pacific Northwest", November /1982 gb.M.

the Northwest Conservation Act Coalition (page-28) y,M j;' gN- /

w.S~Efe

..'" x5 .

INTERROGATORY 14: Is it your contention that if and. Mon.at.h. ~..e w' d -

WNP-1 is completed and ready to operate, it will not befoperated. 3  %

because there would be no need for the power? ~ 2-h.@47) _ ..

nytsyt?-k :l+; , . .

~

h RESPONSE: Yes. .

j .y. Q.8.6 g%..u.']

2

.c. .< u

>.cd,?f.My Qu ff.4w L:S T INTERROGATORY 15: What factors do you contend are relev'an M in assessing whether power from WNP-1 s,

will ever be needed??'N5" .

d....,*d%s ,4 { . .

.e.[dh;' " g.

l RESPONSE: The factors listed in the " Northwest Conservation -

'? '

M@ J p and Electric Power Plan", Volume I, April 27, 1983by[;kt.k,ME+-?

1Ge

.W..stq:hH

" Analysis of AlternativembN,hWjf;c1h * #4W we-Northwest Power Planning Council, the

- , . . -n.u,a el, areb

~$@.yMG- - ')

Related to , WNP-3",s May 26, 1983 by the BonnevilleMPoTier)jtx gi  ;

' Y8N.

Adminstration, the "Model Electric Power and Conservati' oiUPlan NkWM.. W d@

-#3hldg.%$ 2d for the Pacific ' Northwest", November 1982 b y' the Nol'thwe' $fb ?

. m ~}y.QQQCi}f'y Conservation Act Coalition, and the "Ana. lysis of f3d Resourdd?%ne:,n{:,

A - pO Alternet ves" dated April 19, 1982 by BPA. .

d .h?:%-.k.

,3 "hs v; ft.:d$

- .4 m'? NY Sf . e' ~

. *ft*'Q:sc?

Respectfully bmitted, +

hbh.

2 h w i m'?:,

'f - y.1. &.eXQi.r .

!  :&j -$ JEW iA.5:-

Datcd t.. : s day, the 13th Nina Bell - k . q'Ey.g_ LQf.y@

of .'uly, 1983. Coalition for Safe Power' W %'["I]

--} ;;.}c.m . , %;;.i-f.

. ~
f. ; . ,f.' *# ?y

. .i _ ' ' g (.;, - }^ ).P']s y u j,. . t g -l

S&1  :.n . .a

__ A,w_.d%:4

. _ . - . _. _ ~ , - - . .-:-.~.. ---:.--.-- - - . - - - - - - .

i@.

.a:9Tih.

Chg.

cxcu *: .. i

"'M; ' . 3-Tep .,4..  % ,. '

6IL' 't ,

k' &$

.. Js

~ Y. 'ElCN.,b

. -e.Ns. .h

.- .wa yC 'pi' nsg ' , ti

. ; 4. 1:4

af Q,,hj-e STATE OF CREGON ) i7f f y

) aa. r:y,g County of Multnomah ) j 3) If 4

p;. }N -

-eyys3.

. . Q.?l$d$."

Nina Bell, being duly sworn, deposes and says:  :'Fj@.V,., . l That she is the Staff Intervenor of the Coalition for Safe'('htfh Power, and that the contents of "INTERVENOR'S UPDATED .d$gl@gi q g' l

RESPONSES TO NRC STAFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES,'JUL'Y$fi l 13, 19o.,3" and "INTERVENOR'S UPDATED RESPONSES TO APPLICANT'S.i "

i FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, JULY 13, 1983" are true and$O{ M -. I correct to the best of her information, knowledge and .M. ' ll belief. All responses therein were prepared by herself7anibl.., i I

Eugene Rosolie . .i 6M."'#

k-d

-S .

,.:' .g' -

Q.t .n.

u.

Signed: 'JM2d [

YW QQ'

. [NN 3

' llnyn ,.,w&r-  !

- &T *

=

Nina Bell M- .- _.

??@$1.dh ^

1 ^ M TC '-N; m.s 'a'%

Coalition for Safe Power , .

v;??hs :4 '

I W.Q?S$?b5$

SUFRIBED AN,D SWORN to. '.)efore me this /~~~~~dayof 19

, 1983. k:hSI QwhN ke h *W- N %w .

. ,r.ry.px o:,;Qq

<-n , ~ m

~ L'hD i ) h

,/___"_____ Mi h. 9 Notery P alic for Oregon [ h. .gq g. .

.,7,pi.

My Commission EEpires: 4 -/f.-((/ jh 4.

k g mAjg p&,i-dm h  !

evky h *a gan 4*

,~

4:h.Wl' 1,l1 w

c y. 3 e ;

yy s

.(:- -e '

. k.T. .' ,,i w 1 :

.'..mMi.g';,. -. ..

  • 1.,, _

~

Y DOI

. .$ c . f u;-;

4,

, ? #jd-:? 7; .; j[J

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20076M068&oldid=2816113"