ML20076M064

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion to Compel Answers from Util to Second Set of Interrogatories.Interrogatories Concern Issues Properly Discoverable.Related Correspondence
ML20076M064
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 07/13/1983
From: Bell N
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES (FORMERLY COALITION
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20076M062 List:
References
ISSUANCES-CPA, NUDOCS 8307200131
Download: ML20076M064 (3)


Text

_ _. _

c l

4 :. % & s % W In.txtu) Cc:cG_sPONDENO.

Ffb.~1dy@yWA a

fCUdMik l

i jy M.

t p,,4 %

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,a

( r. - Q,y & 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f

BEE 9EE_IHE_aIQUI9_E6 EIY_aED_kIGENSIEg_BQ68Q j i.,k,, g:,~' c1

' Y 91 In the Matter of

)

&.'Y?4i&w, f$ 2, u

)

l WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM Docket No. 50- 46QCPALhr.,4~ S.

et. al.

)

- d ';

~

m

' '.M.

G' (WP?SS 'Juclear Project No.'l)

)

.m.

\\

. - - ( Q, '

l Y

i 99akIIIGE__E98_E6EE_29EEE_59II9E_I9_G95EEb_6Esyggg_Ig_gECOND QEL 9E_INIEEE99aI9EIEE_I9_6EEk19aEIt_29b1_13 _1983. ;,4;g a

t r

MD-The Coalition for Safe Power, intervenor in the Eh 'N

. ':Mti $

above-captioned proceeding served copies of its second setIN

.a.'i?.; K. _,,

interrogatories on Applicant on June 9, 1983. Applicant reEpodi 9

. ',dn 21,'22,d N

.-25 ti on June 28, 1983 and objected to interrogatories 19,

.. w ;. V e- '

r m.y ;

. jyy _,

j 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 42, 43,"44, 45, and 47.

~

j

ntervenor hereby moves for an Order causing Applicantito...

3

  • Q..

respond to interrogatories 25, 27, 28, 31, 32, 35, 38,-and 42(an b

,,, j -3 '

to respond more fully.to interrogatories 26 and 50forwhicN,%f

'Mi M.

[a sg-v.)-

inadequate responses were provided.

m

1. Interrogatories 31, 32, 35, and 38 refer to th[ neb h-idil.-

Initial Decision (LBP-75-72, 2 NRC 922) upon which the 7 x.

.w,

. kN.

role of -;;

e BP,A

.V; const:: uction permit for the WNP-1 was issued, the

.;fg_f and how it was established in the ASLB decision.

Applicanti.;;.

~ '??'i&

m %4.q5- : N" relies upon the BPA recommendation as the basis for the WP-W additional extension request at issue in this proceeding. %:. :.. m Thei

~

.~4NQ interrogatories as.they. seek to establish the legal basis r

g,g.

Applicant's reliance on the BPA recommendation concern ' issues y.'

4.id@ddh q

which are properly discoverable.

.gQ,393

- >.,.c. ;. 4 y

thediS'ferencebAtw'AenphigA}

2.

Interrogatory 25 seeks to discover

v. m,a,v. p,.A A'plicant and the BPAlto'cGU "N

three terns which have been used by p

. :=t.e gin 8307200131 830713 w Z'Wfk(c' Smi PDR ADOCK 05000460

... O.' y PDR u

n.. ... 3,.c . q -W*c3:. g ~.. yay. c w ~~- p.Y. -mab; and WNP-3 plants have,been[.rW %'tR= describe the states in which the WNP-1 _ ji?:k LE'Y

  • placed.

Intervonor is.not attempting to raise health andfaafety r.i W w T,494 ? e by this request but only seeking to discover the3 meaning M..ya . g, issues

c:4-+nwe f,.iid.

%1k,

S~WW

..E,

  • s.

n ...p k in the news nedia: nd@";y. s. m y of terms used by'the parties ~ and their agents

a A.,4 *f C5
$ jMM;'k B

and public documents'.W9. ~. 28 an'd 3*.,.I!5 K:,w. ', W,.4 -l,k *,- ~ 42': M 3. Applicant objects to'. interrogatories 27, projects on thegyg k.'. ~2 W stating that the effect of other of Applicant's

l$ & h Qy The WNP-3 Decision Document M F(

M N-deferral of WNP-1 15 irrelevant.-

.;ft
vng;%d" M

that thelrestart of construction of WNP-1-iaMf3fMWF! ' 30 establishes ... :iS". ::.7. s Mf) C. a g inevitably and incontrovertably tied to the restart ofa.?4 M @~DMi '.kk 6t b l Mr . -g?.M.. w,.J construction of WNP-3 G.See e.g. pages 40, 75, 23. The WNP-3 - W: 2-w,.-w + W Uw e - ..:= ..pn potential ' default'.q on Decision Document,also;. establishes that the i .m:wpw, _m .., gf3 . n e. WNP-4/5 and other events surrounding these terminated unitalTeig y ~ R%%:%- .,. 4 contractors claims on'4 and 5I will affect the continued bd N ~ e

Qy$

FJf . r',~.'..i ' f w-n construction of UNP-3 and WNP-l. See eg. pages 2, 3, 21. --1Th airp;4 h.w. N(.]&f-4 as the basis for.a showing c g.k naterial is properly discoverable ' Q.hgri a G " encompass [ing3'a'i'F.H 8.yM N " good cause" which ALAB-722 defines as <,- w. y. y. w ki M g t h.o JrCL % 44 s should be complete and is N.D t.N;w v&WM.-~s Judgement about why the plant yu M.in.p,t y,..W,%.y M applicants f ault fori..}.q.J; dg-gm;/,c, a-g +;&. T-@Jw c. rest soley upon a Judgement as to the must still be'ny:gt q'J%,'. madeM delay." A:A3 722 goes on to say " A Judgement 4 vMMM 7 -M.'.@2MS-as to whether continued construction should nonetheless.be-. s -.m.. : 4.L cn

-O M%.s m n6Z. "-

i D ' fkp :F' allowed." 6. be ordered.to 5 g.sr*A- .. p :-. 4. Intervenor further moves that the Applicant t.,. provided ' h.: J ;ft.y. N._# c y %~ f respond fully to interrogatories 26 and 50 because the i. ..y r e s p o r.ses were inadequate and lacking in substance entirely.

gf..g p q'I n.;

f;.c., Regard.ng interrogatory 26, Applicant should " explain fully the.= v.-5f A i.. >.p.1-QF answer", showing how each factor identified affects the reatcrt: M M.I.! .w-x. a. of constr"uction of WNP-1 and how the decision will made for each,.,Z. 9.- ~p ' '$ e l W ~(.,l < _ kh

s -. -. w __ - ~. . t.. g.g,. 2,.:;;.py@n; 'M,. ~ : <N-. 3,.fi,y. ~ + ~ x Y. ' ..*. sty lq, ~ "?.*'=0 .i.>:)P! g .Q

nterrogatory SC addresses the ongoing question of the 'f.S ;'9

. r.: *.uy.h ;-:y h. '? st w constitutionality of Washin~gton State Intiative 394 which' hasp ~% .l.. Docunent'..i. g).'43 3jdN )

t $ g.

i serious implications according to the WNP-3 Decision , R - W. '* -~ < h~x.pMf.62 ndhfa ^ Applicant fails entirely to provide a basis for its res +m.,. e...,.., , j ' D.h'i 4 "'t '...4 - %A requested in the face of the interrogatory.. S..CE9'! Eh.;. hh'hj +1 M W @f3 x 2 x ~ : '.'N ~ Respectfully submitted,

  • %d.

.g ) [* i _ _ M ____ __ _._,, !$g Dated this day, the 13t ina Bell . _.,-;;y, Coalition for Safe Power l'.'5 M;;k of July, 1983. ]?$R*2 . :+8j@ 'M(5$d Os' m,. wyY 4.gw-J4J.M,.4h'm -:...w TjEN;'Y. - ..,, -)s 1 t ., "9 .w

== 44g. ~

  • 8

. m %c. ~54 .s .....?.)Mt?u ^f.22 dd .o..ggg x ,%'r o +* e MN. 'M... E 4 ,.+,?'p.'f.k N I '.. w - " Jigfy .'3 4 w

%. $ j]f,4 % '
... s.c.o I
  • 1". V. r.u. M s to.

Y$.. . ' mm W-A,E% r.4.- i

  • t,,

. i +, j,p.r. - -,.. 'Tr .v';%.4.d$%ig ' N$, s'$.: h' f* ~d:", C if ','@4als en. -- es -Af2*kYp h ht M a.wga.s " 4 4'.s.. ~ n-4h.. % :n *- k ?,C. " O.. t " .0 I- .w.v.cunes , 0 Sih .w.am,. $[fhD$ f y-3.Ng-a. ? 3.-v44 6a.wns; 1 ,-cn'. f.b k3 Sh m. e -, r;.. w - -Cf

  • s d' k. !h Y kh l MM $b38dM

-}}