ML20076M064
| ML20076M064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1983 |
| From: | Bell N NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES (FORMERLY COALITION |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076M062 | List: |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-CPA, NUDOCS 8307200131 | |
| Download: ML20076M064 (3) | |
Text
_ _. _
c l
4 :. % & s % W In.txtu) Cc:cG_sPONDENO.
Ffb.~1dy@yWA a
fCUdMik l
i jy M.
t p,,4 %
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
,a
( r. - Q,y & 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
BEE 9EE_IHE_aIQUI9_E6 EIY_aED_kIGENSIEg_BQ68Q j i.,k,, g:,~' c1
' Y 91 In the Matter of
)
&.'Y?4i&w, f$ 2, u
)
l WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM Docket No. 50- 46QCPALhr.,4~ S.
et. al.
)
- d ';
~
m
' '.M.
G' (WP?SS 'Juclear Project No.'l)
)
- .m.
\\
. - - ( Q, '
l Y
i 99akIIIGE__E98_E6EE_29EEE_59II9E_I9_G95EEb_6Esyggg_Ig_gECOND QEL 9E_INIEEE99aI9EIEE_I9_6EEk19aEIt_29b1_13 _1983. ;,4;g a
t r
MD-The Coalition for Safe Power, intervenor in the Eh 'N
. ':Mti $
above-captioned proceeding served copies of its second setIN
.a.'i?.; K. _,,
interrogatories on Applicant on June 9, 1983. Applicant reEpodi 9
. ',dn 21,'22,d N
.-25 ti on June 28, 1983 and objected to interrogatories 19,
.. w ;. V e- '
r m.y ;
. jyy _,
j 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 42, 43,"44, 45, and 47.
~
j
- ntervenor hereby moves for an Order causing Applicantito...
3
- Q..
respond to interrogatories 25, 27, 28, 31, 32, 35, 38,-and 42(an b
,,, j -3 '
to respond more fully.to interrogatories 26 and 50forwhicN,%f
'Mi M.
[a sg-v.)-
inadequate responses were provided.
m
- 1. Interrogatories 31, 32, 35, and 38 refer to th[ neb h-idil.-
Initial Decision (LBP-75-72, 2 NRC 922) upon which the 7 x.
.w,
. kN.
role of -;;
e BP,A
.V; const:: uction permit for the WNP-1 was issued, the
.;fg_f and how it was established in the ASLB decision.
Applicanti.;;.
~ '??'i&
m %4.q5- : N" relies upon the BPA recommendation as the basis for the WP-W additional extension request at issue in this proceeding. %:. :.. m Thei
~
.~4NQ interrogatories as.they. seek to establish the legal basis r
g,g.
Applicant's reliance on the BPA recommendation concern ' issues y.'
4.id@ddh q
which are properly discoverable.
.gQ,393
- >.,.c. ;. 4 y
thediS'ferencebAtw'AenphigA}
2.
Interrogatory 25 seeks to discover
- v. m,a,v. p,.A A'plicant and the BPAlto'cGU "N
three terns which have been used by p
. :=t.e gin 8307200131 830713 w Z'Wfk(c' Smi PDR ADOCK 05000460
... O.' y PDR u
n.. ... 3,.c . q -W*c3:. g ~.. yay. c w ~~- p.Y. -mab; and WNP-3 plants have,been[.rW %'tR= describe the states in which the WNP-1 _ ji?:k LE'Y
- placed.
Intervonor is.not attempting to raise health andfaafety r.i W w T,494 ? e by this request but only seeking to discover the3 meaning M..ya . g, issues
- c:4-+nwe f,.iid.
%1k,
- S~WW
..E,
- s.
n ...p k in the news nedia: nd@";y. s. m y of terms used by'the parties ~ and their agents
- a A.,4 *f C5
- $ jMM;'k B
and public documents'.W9. ~. 28 an'd 3*.,.I!5 K:,w. ', W,.4 -l,k *,- ~ 42': M 3. Applicant objects to'. interrogatories 27, projects on thegyg k.'. ~2 W stating that the effect of other of Applicant's
- l$ & h Qy The WNP-3 Decision Document M F(
M N-deferral of WNP-1 15 irrelevant.-
- .;ft
- vng;%d" M
that thelrestart of construction of WNP-1-iaMf3fMWF! ' 30 establishes ... :iS". ::.7. s Mf) C. a g inevitably and incontrovertably tied to the restart ofa.?4 M @~DMi '.kk 6t b l Mr . -g?.M.. w,.J construction of WNP-3 G.See e.g. pages 40, 75, 23. The WNP-3 - W: 2-w,.-w + W Uw e - ..:= ..pn potential ' default'.q on Decision Document,also;. establishes that the i .m:wpw, _m .., gf3 . n e. WNP-4/5 and other events surrounding these terminated unitalTeig y ~ R%%:%- .,. 4 contractors claims on'4 and 5I will affect the continued bd N ~ e
- Qy$
FJf . r',~.'..i ' f w-n construction of UNP-3 and WNP-l. See eg. pages 2, 3, 21. --1Th airp;4 h.w. N(.]&f-4 as the basis for.a showing c g.k naterial is properly discoverable ' Q.hgri a G " encompass [ing3'a'i'F.H 8.yM N " good cause" which ALAB-722 defines as <,- w. y. y. w ki M g t h.o JrCL % 44 s should be complete and is N.D t.N;w v&WM.-~s Judgement about why the plant yu M.in.p,t y,..W,%.y M applicants f ault fori..}.q.J; dg-gm;/,c, a-g +;&. T-@Jw c. rest soley upon a Judgement as to the must still be'ny:gt q'J%,'. madeM delay." A:A3 722 goes on to say " A Judgement 4 vMMM 7 -M.'.@2MS-as to whether continued construction should nonetheless.be-. s -.m.. : 4.L cn
- -O M%.s m n6Z. "-
i D ' fkp :F' allowed." 6. be ordered.to 5 g.sr*A- .. p :-. 4. Intervenor further moves that the Applicant t.,. provided ' h.: J ;ft.y. N._# c y %~ f respond fully to interrogatories 26 and 50 because the i. ..y r e s p o r.ses were inadequate and lacking in substance entirely.
- gf..g p q'I n.;
f;.c., Regard.ng interrogatory 26, Applicant should " explain fully the.= v.-5f A i.. >.p.1-QF answer", showing how each factor identified affects the reatcrt: M M.I.! .w-x. a. of constr"uction of WNP-1 and how the decision will made for each,.,Z. 9.- ~p ' '$ e l W ~(.,l < _ kh
s -. -. w __ - ~. . t.. g.g,. 2,.:;;.py@n; 'M,. ~ : <N-. 3,.fi,y. ~ + ~ x Y. ' ..*. sty lq, ~ "?.*'=0 .i.>:)P! g .Q
- nterrogatory SC addresses the ongoing question of the 'f.S ;'9
. r.: *.uy.h ;-:y h. '? st w constitutionality of Washin~gton State Intiative 394 which' hasp ~% .l.. Docunent'..i. g).'43 3jdN )
- t $ g.
i serious implications according to the WNP-3 Decision , R - W. '* -~ < h~x.pMf.62 ndhfa ^ Applicant fails entirely to provide a basis for its res +m.,. e...,.., , j ' D.h'i 4 "'t '...4 - %A requested in the face of the interrogatory.. S..CE9'! Eh.;. hh'hj +1 M W @f3 x 2 x ~ : '.'N ~ Respectfully submitted,
- %d.
.g ) [* i _ _ M ____ __ _._,, !$g Dated this day, the 13t ina Bell . _.,-;;y, Coalition for Safe Power l'.'5 M;;k of July, 1983. ]?$R*2 . :+8j@ 'M(5$d Os' m,. wyY 4.gw-J4J.M,.4h'm -:...w TjEN;'Y. - ..,, -)s 1 t ., "9 .w
== 44g. ~
- 8
. m %c. ~54 .s .....?.)Mt?u ^f.22 dd .o..ggg x ,%'r o +* e MN. 'M... E 4 ,.+,?'p.'f.k N I '.. w - " Jigfy .'3 4 w
- %. $ j]f,4 % '
- ... s.c.o I
- 1". V. r.u. M s to.
Y$.. . ' mm W-A,E% r.4.- i
- t,,
. i +, j,p.r. - -,.. 'Tr .v';%.4.d$%ig ' N$, s'$.: h' f* ~d:", C if ','@4als en. -- es -Af2*kYp h ht M a.wga.s " 4 4'.s.. ~ n-4h.. % :n *- k ?,C. " O.. t " .0 I- .w.v.cunes , 0 Sih .w.am,. $[fhD$ f y-3.Ng-a. ? 3.-v44 6a.wns; 1 ,-cn'. f.b k3 Sh m. e -, r;.. w - -Cf
- s d' k. !h Y kh l MM $b38dM
-}}