ML20076M059

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Third Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence
ML20076M059
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 07/13/1983
From: Bell N
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES (FORMERLY COALITION
To:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Shared Package
ML20076M062 List:
References
ISSUANCES-CPA, NUDOCS 8307200126
Download: ML20076M059 (7)
v • d • e


Text

~, _c_

-+

~ - - -

g

.~_.

_ _.... ~. -

~

m...

.e

~

..hil~

UNITED STATED #6EU,wpr,sp0NDETE

. s '.

N ('.

N AMERICA x,'

i c,-\\

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

. )-'

~ T.

T,'T'

,b

?.EFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING B05hD acct > &li JUL4:

F-<

t--- !

C:

y;)

n the Matter of

)

v

{ ctee.

}

0 y L SG.

2AEM!NS ON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

)

Docket No.',502460CPA 9 et. al.

)

/

tu??SS Nuclear Project No. 1)

)

G;6LIII9E_E9E_SaEE_EggEB_IBIED_gEI_QE_INIEBBQGoIgBIEg 19_"6EE61cogI,_gULY_1@t _198@..

Pursuant to Commission rules, 10 C.F.R. 2.740b and 10 CFR 2. 7 4 ~-. intervenor Coalition for Safe Power hereby recuests that the Applicant answer each of the following interrogatories seperately and fully in writing and under r'equested. In ca:h, and to produce the documents as answering these interrogatories, applicants is requested to furnish all information available to applicant, however obtained, including hearsay, and including information known by or in the possession of applicant's employees, agents and attorneys or appearing in applicant's records.

If unable to answer the following interrogatories in full after exercising due diligence to do so, so state and enswer to the extent possible, specifying the inability to answer the remainder, stating whatever informa' tion or-knowledge is had concerning the unanswered portion and describing the efforts to secure the unknown information.

Information sought by these interrogatories obtained efter service of answers shall be disclosed to the intervenors by supplementary or amended answers within a r

reesonable time after such information is obtained, as 8307200126 830713 PDR ADOCK 05000460 3M3 0

PDR

i.:,_

.:~ '"

a m. :.... a.

~

~___ _ _ _

. 4 recuired by 10 CFR 2.740(e).

In each response, identify any documents used in e

-e answering the interrogatory.

As used herein, the tern

" documents" means all writings of every kind, both originals and copies, including but not limited to, correspondence, m

letters, memoranda, notes, reports, papers, studies,

']

.. w' analyses, surveys, test' results, books, records, contracts or egreements, telegrams and 'other ccimmunications sent or 7.+

..]{.

received, transcripts of meetings, hearings or statements, computer printouts, maps, charts, graphs, drawings, tables,

,i@9:

e

' rh calculations and computations, and printed or publia'hed

- ' * '$w

,' 4.k t

matter.

The term " documents" also includes voice

" '. ~.. (J:p@

, qqm

.~d 9-e recordings', films, tapes, photographs and other data c.n

..m

{ meQ

. =,

compiletions from which information can be obtained, lL?.s Nft1 including materials used in data processing.

.. c.

...+:r.Q:

',.. -.. d INTERROGATORY 1: State the full name, address,

  1. '@A occupation and employer of each person answering the

. u..

[

...y

~. 7 +.

JJ

~~

interrogatories and designate the interrogatory or the part M%

. M q..,,. q thereof he or she answered.

'. - :' M yt

...; y

'h c

+y INTERROGATORY 2: Provide a list of and make available l

0 e '.1 documents received by the Applicant from the Bonneville Power Adminstration (BPA) from January 1,

1981 to the present regarding the anticipated cessation and actual cessation of cons 1!ruction activity at WNP-1, including the

..g placing of the project in a mothballed, deferred or preserved state.

4

-~

,a,

.2:1.1-.-

'~ ~
~ 2-

+. w

.. :====-- :

- = =..

.m.y. ;

t INTERROGATORY 3: Provide a list of and make available

[

for inspection and copying all documents provided by Applicant to the BPA from January 1, 1981 to the present regarding the anticipated cessation and actual cessation of construction activity at WNP-1, including the placing of the pro]ect in a mothballed', deferred or preserved state.

k.w a

, _ ;f^_ f :.~

yc, -).;;m%m

.wi -xi INTERROGATORY 4: What are the " current conditions" 7

referred to by Licensee in its response to Intervenor's

. 31.. M Second Set of Interrogatories, Nos. 14 and 24, which affect

-, s.: " C.

- ~

)

the determination that an extension to 1991 is for a i.

" reasonable period of time"?

Provide this information in a M

~, -a -

-)

list format, with the greatest specificity possible and refer to all the documents which are relied upon as a basis I

4.

for each condition.

INTERROGATORY 5: Provide all materials and documents used by the BPA to prepare the " Analysis of Alternatives

.-n.

Related to UNP-3, May 26, 1983" by the BPA (hereinafter the WNP-3 Decision' Document) which bear in any refered to as way upon the deferral of construction on WNP-1.

INTERROGATORY 6:

Provide all materials and documents used by the BPA to prepare the " Analysis of Resource' Alternatives" dated April 19, 1982 by the BPA (hereinafter, refered to as the WNP-1 Decision Document).

j s

'I e

i4

~

-- J

._C.

......t

?

lqp.;- a6-

.. m c,,r

_4

, Q.tfQ.

%...._, b M q:

.g. ~.s w x New.

..+nr4 pc;f:

'. f.'-

'-tgjjpis<.p

!NTERROGATORY 7: Explain why the Applicant believes Md.#w hkT.

need for power and financing are not issues to be considered en o k.;fMt.'

L in this proceeding taking into account item 6 on page 2 of

[c,, A 2 :a;YSy&

- a. l' Qe_

letter dated January 11, 1983 requesting an Applicant's

. u extension for the completion date for WNP-1 Cand used

.,-;... a a,

,% )N

.hh M ap subsequently as the basis for the NRC Staff SER and Order, 3

e

/ : -lT dated June 16, 1983) which states: " recommendations of the

' C':-$P m

s d.i -

p. w_. :: s.-

M?r?.'.;~Mid?

J BPA to WPPSS that the construction on WNP-1 be delayed for

, me

+

A.

I

,e an additional period of two to five years (beyond June 1, '

..%yg!d

...Ty'"48ei.hii

-[ g..jgQ:7.g 1986) due to loadfrespgnse_balaneg_ changes and ecgngmic,. Wh5.j.1ry.4h $

factors identified in the BPA's report ' Analysis of Resource 34.d... '~

a.i%.

gg d'@%.c_ ' ' '2.-a X

n:

..r.. N d [ ' M Alterr.atives' dated April 19, 1982." (emphasis added).

N

, ]

  • h D

%. B:5 i:

I-y4,.,a_.,

1 INTERROGATORY 8: Identify what obstacles exist to 3.aQQyQ{f)

<M@fM9 i

. br.bySM.&,9 i%.

financing for WNP-1 including any or all elements of the BPA 3i5h!I$.),Od!5

.I.-N.;@pM(p'M recopendation, how such obstacles prevent financing, the and what'f;ind-@d,,M

'lds%W Q w r.nu.#,e.-

W anticipated time for each obstacle to be overcome, r

g,r d>d.h@Q+khh

.a avd

x nust occur for each obstacle to be overcome.

Explain how.p y'.tli*D,; $.,,....

47 C;

all obstacles will'belovercome in a "two to five year" T.:'L;.4Ytisa E

.ps.$ 3-m m,yL.A.

> ~ ', 2 w.y gg?2.d date of cessation of construction..-245@&,w h

period following the uy s

..m;.

e

.fa.Y;.sN F 'zn.t6 gGP

.w p-.

c.- nM

~

s g

e

'NTERROGATORY 9: Which of the scenarios presented in 004 c W.%

4 M R,C?i.

5 ' ?IN.+- :,..R a

~

.NY Table :::.C.

of the WNP-3 Decision Document was chosen in

.,.9.c%%h7.,;~

. m

.:s,,gs

.'u;y 9,

1933 by the WPPSS Executive Board / Participants 4.,tQ1e N ig 1

Con-.. ee/'JPPSS Board of Directors?

, d..,js -

'y' ~6.-g

^

4 : ant 1Tf.G,

. Une K 5* :.:

?

s.

! %p w.s. 3;',.. v Q

TN ERROGATORY 10: Does the Applicant believe that the restert of construction of WNP-1 is tied in any way to the

<h

.*fi.7 j',

kicGi %<

e

,.,,,.,h '.2 d 1 2 2--up.M

'J s

+

- -

  • sp:.,,;

-... -.=.

'?,$%,f-.','py&Wgg aJ,

.,t.--:.,.y; gjj

-5*

Li ^., '$s <ll;;d*Rf.

b n.-

~..,

- &.t

. s..

n:'..

h use of BPA revenues for any of the net-billed proje'ets? 7 f3 %g'f.j l'4%

Oces BPA belive that~the restart of construction of WNP.-1si'sW AW

. ' " ^hi,NhkN.5 tied in any way to the use of BPA revenues for any of; the9'- Al$. i legal basis fo O, 4.>+4

. a,. n+

a..

n a

net-billed projects?

If so, provide the

q.v..yg &

use of such funds.

_. h [ F. @u 4.., t w

' !.L44.y NI-%

.:~ N s tLd,4... r.s

.n 41 *$'c.y&' Q I I to Interrogatory'1 m

w INTERROGATORY 11: If the answer

. y,,; e m

, s.-

~

to Interogatory 9 above'is.0I'

~

above is yes and the answer

-m

' l.

6.c ' '

scenario 2a, 2e'or 2f, what impact would Applicant '^U.t..g? ' F..

j

.n

.y#

.3 anticipate on the restart of construi: tion of WNP-1 from"a?

r

.... p r.'

-r g construction or rampdo.::u

.,,.s.

e wn~,. :

ruling that use of BPA revenues for was illegal, including the effects on the rampdown w,&

L

%.. *1 construction of WNP-37

. W+q ' %<y'u n.c-m a-A._y%... g.: <,... s. c In..,

~

.g.

~.1:m-a~y m.d.w 9

q'., 3

~Y.:.z,cyt in the WNP-3 Deciai' owe, 9 ;

i INTERROGATORY 12: BPA states

....3 3 v. m:

sh~.s.

.s a

m 3

.3.x.-

-t W

is, tied

  • i W Document that'the restart of construction of WNP-1 Does Applicant'. g.d ga% g.eo.

p 3 v.

7 restart of construction of WNP-3.

... %p.v.s ".q' to the

'l,W b.& 5 ~~.&

&. _-*? '-

s Explaiaful1ysandW..]hr,[

~

agree or disagree with this position?

s

..y3,g;MN$

,.h iig. ;

provide the basis ~for the response.

" (.:;@ TM-MA%

r v.JJ.?dl CM..

.~

,+n 2, ~.,.3 : 4

,%-e..

, ?p.

' - ^. :

_ r v.t,. -

at s xm v.

h.-:s;;

g.-

mu.c q Q

- 1

~~m,w.. q,;;...ut n %,n

.,, s..

99xg

.-s Y

~

INTERROGATORY 13: Whateffectwouldtherebeonthej Q.*f

..;.,9

. 3 %.,ciify restart of construction of WNP-1 if it were determined'thatto'M.

t i@:i'::.-

W.f. % i r..

there had been a misallocation of funds on the WNP-1/4?

cLT 5.d?.

i 4:c n:

projects such that such funds would have to be repaid.to the':;,

. w c.
-

4 _. ;,i.- :;W.

';.t.5.,,.,

UNP-4/5 Participant.s by WPPSS?

<.;1:p y v.g -

.,, e..,),(

s.q n

j dW F,r INTERROGATORY 14: Taking into consideration the?

  • /*

in the WNP-3 Decision Document that* deferral ofk.4.-

c ate:nents

  • s ;*J.'

I s

i '

g-a

. 'l!h$si --

-2

.s, :.p. -

.,Q -4 g

~

.. -.. - - m...= = -z. w

.*-ij 4

.$.; i b y:n a..

. M eY g

6-4g x

.. m

. Y sis,

e s

..syr uA D.

years will leadD'.7$n.)

minimum of three c:,nst.ruction of WNP-3 for a

- 4.,

invariably to an addit-ional deferral of WNP-1 f or 2 to 7 ' '

.a..-p>x "d

'Y

)f ycers (for a total of 5 to 12 years) and the fact that WPPSS? y:h.<t,

.. u w.

. w. se..

s d+ferred construction of WNP-3 for "three years" on? July} 87h;w,ggg,,;

wwehg to'the,NRC g j p

...T.p

'983 what is the basis for Applicant's statements

..F 4

,s.

4 A

that the deferral of WNP-1 is for 2 to 5 years?

Wha

'T-m *A ('y}<<

W M

Applicant's basis for claiming that 2to5yearsis.a:7.].gpfj"we.s,j

.t. - pr:<w..

_....n e

c

" reasonable period of time"?

Does Applicant contempleteean 6 h ru t.

AW..,.. %

,,, p d%.&

'='

amendment to theli-: current application for a constructio V

- t +:/2T.p s,.

rm :ge-

...m permit extension? 2f not, why not?

Provide all documents n,ig i f'

.. :h{

? ? db$Y 3

j related to the responses in this interrogatory,inc1Mding

.t

-lc.$nf.f,.,CQ',.(

'n n,

K*

- ;J '..

% {l..

internal memoranda, notes, minutes etc.

@k

- :: m.n u R

.?

7y.. n.ww sy n g

)'- L'.

?. -;,: : my

%?h$$%:Yi' k.

f INTERROGATORi 15: Does the Applicantdisagreel-with{the.

g n.s.>..

m t

g3k 7

WNP-3 Restart Sensitivit[ U. dc c..

t r e s.u l t s of the "WNP-1 vs.

,..x

-s

-+3 g 4 RXJ F-.

Analysis" presented in Table IV.K.1 of the WNP-3 De' cision 42W,

~

c..

_..drff.?"?

MNS$f te l which':ciencludes that a restart of WNP-3 is'Mg- ;..

Document

.g9.g1* 1, e

...~w,.

-L..u what specific consideratiois.....n

^i preferred to."WNPni?'

If so, z::gopfshy

9.
  • i

. v;> ;.a and in what way?'M, %'ry.

~. h g.~

does Applicant' consider are wrong,

-w

...y t

.^. gap rg y 6

the'Qh*;2,Q.

9L

(

restartTof.

INTERROGATORY 16: Upon what factors does W%%il h

ccnstruction of WNP-3 rely?

What obstacles exist? 4 WhenVerid.

W 4 GS@i;. k.?

-blUNNh these obstacles expected to be overcome?

~ a:QQ?4+$@

how are

' h- : h D

gi w

n the minutes of all needinghilhh/~,-l

!NTERROGATORY 17: Provide

. x 4.... w Q,

. ;p u

b WPPSS Board of Directors at which the delay of WNP-1,

. s$

3 ~;:

of. t'

  • N

,W

'iiO]"ff%; 1 as discussed.

. M u:y

-Anr-dN)

'4 m hhak

.Ahc@W m

.,c. a}i 4.a.ym p s.*

"T 3s yy, gyh,Ydh D

.-. w. A;.2 r

n.

1 -

_j.

,.,..,7,,,

.p.m., G_. 2._,799 wi--

lh l7

~

$h, M. s ?,

~.y :' <

  • g n.; k. : %g;g 3:

s :w;.

32.

meeti[gh@dp~.h:,3s

,- m

NTERROGATORY 18i[ Provide the minutes of all

'T

}!R,Ms

'e

' g delay _ofey-Q:klg%

of the WNP-3 Participants Committee at which the i.G.

.... ~.T,. e, W.. mp

+.z

-my m, &y:q :n} ib.a

'r.Q< g ^ ~ (u Jy WNP-1 was discussed..-. t,,.

raw.

m u.

,&y.&5$$,%.

R ts

...m..

.ty,+% p m 4 :;.4 yy.:q

. s.,. 7

.1

q.q,.yy

or disagree d, ~ m;;;w.Q.Q.'"

INTERROGATORY _19:JDoes the Applicant agree

.y a

. p,,i..e.g

m..

itsresponseto,"!;'h,$S

..MNWp.y pi with the statement byhthe NRC Staff in mis.,~

  • D @dN.%.,;,e m

Intervenor's First Set'of Interrogtatories, No. 41, that.:.ty,Q.^ y n

, m. =. de.e p.. mm-,

y og ggRveL 3,,.

"Need for power has some significance in this proceeding wif.

MWet thereasons.forthep.;gg&y,t?)[j

- a ~ gm k only because it has been raised as among gg4

. %a,.f A,,--

p#

w BPA recommendation to defer construction.

The Permittee;Yj Q

' *g;

?.'$ $2$n&p5~Riip 'i W%

W4,';%r;&b.

offers the BPA recommendation as one of the factors

iykQ'.

?tiR' i

o plant completion +v p';g

,f constituting " good cause" to extend the

's

  • W /* *.*

'. 47??'y )l f.s:.; V /; G l fi W* &

date."'

Explain fully your response.

b I!3'

. ' -.. l.?,eS;:@s-a'h 1

gw

,. hn. M..

I j.f

] }. }*i w.g Respectfully submitted, c. 7.u

'. ]= ?;t' Dgig;u

. - - - ?'

n.q

. !!#$O"4. T

- YT.D. h

',NM Dated this day, the 13th

/

M M.a.9..

f.:?

of July, 1983.

sina Bell

~Hiu%

Coalition for Safe power S4w;.h.MIM..,'d

...,&.Q y,..m,;n,.q. v u

--t.;

?.c,, #N s,

h..m..,

(

I

..... :, %.% w.>v.:sE42 e n.,.

gy '
  • a

.. = t *** 3,a-! *p*A *h.,bs, ;

m

. 5,h [' Wi7 K$).5

?

'.,' &,.fr M $.<.Lm

.x

. np a

' '%. K _* hR T*::i g h

.g. cu>

w

['t g.

, ; 4

' djf 5;Q v 6 v

,y r

? ? ("

.$ T.M,c..w.t$

I h

i:i, a;

.. -. 1; q

,- l% h. A

-[ M b;,y,,

. f'

-a

.\\ \\.t J p.... -WW b n[9 7 ' -I. i.

l l *I y 3 F!T. k NQh

' ? lQ;.my z. v. s,,

v

'.,c s.aM'

. ! er......::.+? R?.

} ^S:

r

/

~ -:c{..

s.

g..

4g

~,;;.'1

- @4

.cp.y w.. w,

....s. f%

~e. %49dNNN!M

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20076M059&oldid=4398624"