ML20076D792
| ML20076D792 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1991 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076D791 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107300247 | |
| Download: ML20076D792 (97) | |
Text
.
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JUNE 1991 1
i
\\
f,dE!BlWaliham IlllRm#
_amg i
5
,5
_./
l Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group l
bR hbI^
NI!bb M.
R PDR
t o
e I
hsuilofwu&nawaavakin...
i il iawak wi,sdoin, wnd sowndjud anal...
g a w a, lii ara, cwawusny, cornaniLrnal...
bh il w a, way, of !;&,...d w dating, Unjob i
uphiUnlustturn,weuj,Ikas.
alw uwnev-duudd, el Un 'wsull of wdavnal jvuuwn, il w owu ow,n, sy wodb wh
~
ws ain wnd on pid, wnd saly%hnn, LL corns l win, kng, Un syd knd of pean,, uljud tin, dating, Un s,Al kny.
Jaans ).6%noru li
.....________._..,_,-.,_._.,,,._,____,....__.,_.._._.-,,.-_,,,,,,,,____.-.,..._,,,m___..,,...
s OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:
ProJ.uction Engineering Division System Engineeribg Test anri Performance Group June 1991
e ABSTRACT PURPOSE The ' Performance Indicators Program
- is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perior-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identifcation of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used f or assessing and rnonitoring Fort Calhoun's plant periormance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.
In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:
- 1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's periormance in key areas,
- 2) include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
- 3) Develop formal definitions for each perf ormance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Perf ormance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance,it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.
REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102," Performance Monitoring Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87 00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, *EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.
I
Table of Contents gJDUSTRY KEY PARA! DETERS n ufna ortD o!Ta PAGE in D.m iuantu uuteniu FORCED OUTAGE RATE.
.0OL%
24%.119%. 11 9 % -
2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REAC10R SCRAMS WHILE CRillCAL..
.0 0.
0 0.
~3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM AC1UATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)..
.0.
0.
0.
.O.
.4 GROSS HEAT RATE..
.9.935, 10.250.10.LLL 10.477.
O EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FAC10R..
M L% - 09%.
94 0 %. M 8%. 7 FUEL REllABILITY INDICA 10R..
. 0 04 -
.14 OLM 0 913 8
PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)-
.1%.
75=
29 2 03 4 9
VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE..
.3 072 4 LOO.. $17 6 -
.4370 10 DlSABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)..
.0%.
0 31 %.
077%. 0 91%. 11 OPERATIONS STATION NET GENERATION.
.1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE,,
.2 UNPLANNED AUTOMAllC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL.
.3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUAllONS -(INPO DEFINITION).
.4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUAllONS -(NRC DEFINITION).
.5 GROSS HEAT RATE.
.6 EOUlVALENT AVAILABillTY FACTOR..
.7 FUEL REll ABILITY INDICATOR.
.. B DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT.
12 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUT AGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS.
.13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET..
.14 DOCUMENT REVIEW.
.15 MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY DtESEL Cf.NERATOR UNii RELIABILITY.
.16 DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (25 DEMANDS),
.17 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE).
.18 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON.OUT AGE).
.19 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON.OUT AGE)..
. 20 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OJTAGE).
. 21 i
O o
MAINTENANCE (cont'd)...
PAGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE lTEMS OVERDUE....
... 22 NUMBER OF OUT OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS...
...... 2 3 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME...
. 24 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)..
. 25 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)..
. 26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE).
.27 (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)....
.28 (GENERAL MAINTENANCE).....
........ 2 9 g
(MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)..
.30 (INSTRUMENTA10N & CONTROL).
.,31 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.
. 32 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT REllABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES..
.. 33 MAIN 1ENANCE EFFECTIVENESS..
.... 34 CHE CK VALVE F A! LURE RATE..........................
. 35 CHEMISTRY AND RADOLOGICAL PROTECTON PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).........
.9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADCACTIVE..
.10 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY......
. 36 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT............
. 37 AUXILIARY 3YSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATON LIMITS........
. 38 IN.LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE..
.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE Ph00UCED.......
.40 MAXIMUM lNDIViDUAL RADIATON EXPOSURE............
. 41 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATONS....
.,42 DECONTAMINATED RADIATON CONTROLLED AREA.....
....,,.....................43 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM....,....
. 44 N U M BE R OF H OT S POTS..-............................
.45 GASEOUS RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT....
..,,4 6 LOUID RADCACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT......
. 47 SECURITY LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)..
.. J B SECURITY INCIDENT BRLAKDOWN.
. 49 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES.
. 50 li
mm.
4-4 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE).
... 51 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE......
..-.... 52 SPARE PARTS ISSUED.
. 52 INVENTORY ACCURACY..
. 53 STOCKOUT RATE.....
. 53 EXPEDITED PURCHASES.....
. 64 INVOICE BREAKDOWN..,,.......
. 55 MATERIAL REQUEST PlJtNNING.
. 55 DESIGN ENGINEERING OL~ 8 TANDING MODIFICATIONS.
. 56 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING).
. 57 OUTSTANDING ENGINE 5 RING ASSISTANCE REQUEST,3 (EAR's).
. 58 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS.
. 59 ENOINEERING CHANUE NOTICE BREAPDOWN...
. 60 INDUSTRIAL S AFETY DISABLING INJUR't FREQUENCY RATE.
. 11 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE..
.,,, 61
]iggaNfigSOURCES NI Wif C PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S..
. 62 ST ~ Fi ',G LEVEL.....
.,63 PT h aNNEL TURNOVER RATE.........,,...,......
. 63 THAINING AND QUAllFICATION SRO ANU RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO.
... 64 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS....
. 65 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS,.
. 66 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS...
. 67 T(J'. AL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING..
. 68 REFUELING OUTAGE MWO OVER ALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)...
.69 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING..
. 70 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE).
. 71 OVAllIy_ASSi.Qf1NGE VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS,
... 72 iii
.. ~. -.
l QUAlfTY ASSURANCE (CONT'D)
COMPARISON OF VIOLATONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS.....
. 73
.=..
CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's WELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL).
. 74 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS.
. 75 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS.
. 76 CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED.
. 77 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS....
. 78 SAFEW ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX.
.. 85 REPORT DISTRIBUTON LIST..
.. 87
SUMMARY
SECTON ADVERSE TREND REPORT...
. 88 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT.,..
.. 88 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT !MPROVEMENTS/ CHANGES.....
. 88 l
l l
l iv
\\
50-Net Generetion (10,000 Mw hourc) r l
40-35.1 31.27
~
28.03 mg 27.26 273 24JS g4g Ijh NRt fpn r
i
%'! 8'83 20-
~
Y 2% @idf Qi% lQ 16.36 e v pe e,.
l I f$
?
\\
J 10-m.r 3:
j 5%
y sd NI h$$5h 0
l j
i i
i i
i Jul90 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
- Mg Jun91 STATION NET GENEF1ATION This indicator shows the not generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.
During the month of June 1991, a not total of 279,013 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. This low not gonoration reflects the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station was opercted at planned reduced power for most of the month of June 1991.
Data Source:. Station Generation heport Adverce Trond: Nono 1
9 t
v s
was-w
=w
Forced Outage Rate
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)
-O-InJustry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)
12% -
GOOD 9.7
~
9%-
1P 6% -
3%-
O C
C C
C C
C C
C C
1.4 0
U O
O N#
U U
0%-
'88 '89 '90 Jul90 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jsn Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the iasiiwelve months.
To achieve the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) forced outage rate goal of 2.4%, the plant catinct be forced off-line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br /> for the remainder of 1991.
Note: If no forced outages occur, the 12 month average Forced Outage Rate will remain constant at 11.9% uittil August when it will decrease due to the August 1990 forced outage being deleted from the 12 month intervcl.
Data Source: NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend: Nona 2
m.
3-
--O-Fort Calhoun Goal
- Industry Upper 10 Percentile E
FCS Reactor Scraras 2-1-
C O
O O
O O
O O,O,O,O,O
,O,O,O,O,O i i
i i
i i
iw
'87'88'89 '90 Jul90 ' Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar -Apr May Jun91.
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in June 1991. The last unplanned t
automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.
The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at i-zero.-
1
- The industry upper ten percenti!e value is zero scrams per unit on an annual batais. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants _in this area.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)
Adverse Trend: None l:
i L.
a o
j
E Safety Systern Actuations
-O-Fort Caltoun Goal
-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-GOOD V
1 1_
i 0 0 0-r-O i D1 i
i i
88 '89 '90 Jul00 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIOi4S-(INPO DEFINITION)
. There were no unplanned safety system actuatior.s during the month of June 1991.
The 1991 goal for the riumber of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system l.
actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the L
upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.
- Data Source: Piant Licensee Event l'aports (LER's)
Adverse Trend: None I-4
4
- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10 -
-1000
+
Critical Hours 0
Safety System Actuations (SSA)
-900 8-
-800 f,
_700 j
E
\\/
W
- z <U
-600 8 5
.x 1
x 3
f 5
-500 E E
y$$ 4-y z
/,;
-400 d
.$ 3 4
-300 j
y w g
j 2-
- -200 s
N 1
j 16 0 3
/ \\
-100 0-
-0 i iii
'88'89'90 JASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJ UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION)
This indbator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSA's) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSA's in-cludes actuaticns when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.
In June there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG-2 started a second time when a breaker trip oc.orred during DG-1 breaker synchroniza-tion. DG-2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situa-tions.
The majority of SSA's disrslayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSA's at Fort Calhoun.
Dat. 3ource: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER's)
Adn rse Trend: None 5
3 Monthly Gross Heat Rate 13-Year-to Date Gross Heat Rate t
Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal
-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 9 12-i o
8 Gooo 11-y 10270 10520 10304
^
O O
O O
O O
10-l -C D--C D-C D
l1 9
i i
i 1
i i
i i
T i
i i
i i
i
'88 -
'89
'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 months, the year-to-date value, and the year-end GHP, for the previous 3 years.
l The Gross Heat Rate Indicator 1991 year-end goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage which resulted in a l
reduction in operating power to save fuel, The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,555 BTU /KWH during the month of June. Design gross heat rate for the station is 10,039 BTU /KWH.
The year to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,366 BTU /KWH.
L The year-end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH)is the theoretical best gross heat L
rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station auring 1991.
l The gross heat Iwe ;ndustry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.
Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trends: The Gross Heat Rate has increased for the past four months dae to the plant operating at planned recJced power and increased rier water iemperature.
The,ross hr 9 ate is expected to be lower in the future when the plant is operated at 100% power ft an entire month.
6
... _.... ~..
O Monthly EAF i
Year to-Date EAF
--O- - Fort Calhoun Year to-Date Goal
-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100% -
- -m D
O-O U
U C
U C
U
~
80 % -i 77 66 O-O-O-O----04 O
M O
O I
56.6 60%-
GOOD 40%-
20%-
?/b ]
\\
I
- 4 i
10%
i i
'88
'89
'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUlvALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOF1 This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Facto.-(EAF). year to-date
' EAF for 1991, and the EAF for tue previous 3 years.
The EAF was reported as 94.76% for the month of June. The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of econorr,y (fuel savings).
The year-to-date EAF was reported as 83.36%.
The EAF For..,alhoun goalis 69% for 1991.
The EAF industry upper ten percent le value is 82.5%.
Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager' Source)
Adverse Trends: None y
7 a
w eus
._,.s_.mr r-
~
- FuelReliabilityindicator 43-Fort Calhoun Goal (1.4)
-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentilo (.04) h; Industry Median (2)
Q 4-8c GOOD C
l'Qll, C
2.4 V
2-a a
a a
a a
a a
a a
1.5 1.5 0
O O
O O
O O
O O
O-
^
9 1
,0 0
C C
C 2
O O
C C
O O
3
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May - Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI)_was reported as.576 nanocuries/ gram for the month
- of June. This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRI value using the plant's actual letdown purification rate was reported as 1.00 nanocuries/ gram.
ihs FRI was calculated for June 1-thru June 15 only because the plant was at a steady j
state for those days. The iodine concentrations were in transition the remainder of the month due to power changes.
The Cycle 13 fu. ' pe6formance continues without an observed fuel failure.- The high FRI value is indicative of previous fuel failures. The last detected fuel failure was during _
Cycle 10.-
The 1991 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuriet/ gram.
The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram.
Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Adverse Trend: None 8
~
Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man-Rem)
--O--
Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rem)
-D-Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166 Man Rem) 300-272 276 200-Y i
j C
D--O-O-O--0-O-D-C D-O-O 1
100-93.4 C
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O o-i
'88
'89
'90 Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During June 1991,5.7 man rem was ;acorded by TLD% worn by personnel while work-ing at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 29.2 man-rem.
The Fort CalhoJD goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75
- man rem.
The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) -
Adverse Trend: None SEP54 9
d cumulative Radioactive Oil Sent For Processing (in gallons)
O Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processirig (in cubic feet) 6000-4000-g g
p g
7
{
y j
g 200 i
i i
4 4
i i
6 I
i 4
4 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct. Nov Dec91
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried
--O-Fort Calhoun Goal Fct Waste Buried (4500) 6195
- C}- Industry Upper 10 Percent;ie Waste Buried (3072)
Tu 7500-
' ;d 4aio O
Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet) 6000-4500-C O
O O
O--C O
O O
O O
O g
3000-O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
C}---O 1500-0 i
i
'89
'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91
' Year end Tetal VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent fc, processing. The lower graph shows the volume of monthly, cumulative annual total, and year-end total of radioactive waste buried the orevious 2 years.
The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of January, February, and March 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the proci csing, and the burying of radioactive waste.
Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwasted shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 7,778.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) -
80.6 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) -
517.6 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.
The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear piants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.
Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)
SEP 54 Adverse Trend: None 10
1991 Disabling hjury Frequency Rate
-X-1990 Disabling injury Frequency Rate 5 Year Average Disabling injury Frequency Rate
~1.4-
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal Industry Upper 10 Percontile
~
1.2 -
GOOD 1-V 7
0.8 -
0.6 -
0.4 -
^
C O
0.2 -
?
,X X
-v
~
0 5
u r-X T-r # r-T-X i r-*
T-*
1-*
r-*7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.
The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-sponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.
There were no (0) lost time accidents repor'9d at the Fort Calhoun Station in June. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is two (2,'
The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31%.
The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0%.
yfcat Year-End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: The high rate for lost time accident rate is due to histoplasmosis, a work related illness.
SEP 25 & 26 11
5 Thermal ChJtput
-O-Fort Calhoun Unmet 1495 MW Goal Tech Spec 1500_MW Limit 1500-1200-f 900-j l
600-
-b t
/
300-9 ea w
1 3
5 7
9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during June 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal that was not met.
Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. To meet peak electrical demand, the plant was brought to 100% powerin the latter half of June, Reduced power operations will be resumed in the fall.
Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend:- None 12
2-Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8 -
e 1.0 -
1.4 -
1.2 -
GOOD
'~
v 0.8 -
/
0.6 -
0.53
, 0.4-
/
0.2 -
0.13 h
(----
0 0
I I
i I
'88
'89
'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were no equipment forced outages reported during the month of June 1991.
The last equipment forced outage occurred in January 1991 and was due to the Decem-ber CEDM housing leak which carriea outage time into January.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 13
Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million)
- 1 1991 Curnulative Total ($ Million) 80-g 1991 Revised Budget 60-40-20-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 25-Mair,tenance 1991 Budget ($ Million; 20-1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15-1991 Revised Budget 10-5-
?
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to dat_e as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The December Bar Graph represents the revised year end budget due to budget revi-sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13.
The budget year-to-date for Operations was 32.6 million dollars for June nNlc ine actual cumu!ative expenditures through June totaled 26.5 million dollar,
~ The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 7.9 million dollars or Jur..
32 \\:c actual cumulative expenditures through June totaled 3.2 million dOrrs Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None 14
a s4 '.
1500 -
Documonts Scheduled for Review Documents Reviewed
.1200--
-V-Overduo Documents 900-
- 600 --
300-i w ~.%
0-
^
=
~
Jul90 Au0 'Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greates than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in-house and include Speci Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Proceduros, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the
-Operating Manual.
During June there were 149 document reviews completed while 40 document reviews
- were scheduled. At the end of June, there were 3 document reviews overdue.
During the month of June there were 72 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.
Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) 4 Adverse Trond: None SEP46 15
Number of Failures /20 Demands
-M-Trigger Vclues for 20 Demands O
Number of Failures /50 Demands
--+-- Trigger Values for 50 Demands O
Number of Failures /100 Demands Trigger Values for 100 Demance 8
3 GOOD 6-l 4
4 4
4 4-3 3
3 3
3 X [
X [
X l X
X X
n n7 o
n s
22 22 22 22 2
2-t 7-7-
2 2
t 2
2 22 22 g
h
~
['E
^
0 0,
0 0
4 0
O O
i 0
1 s
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.
The demands counicd for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of tne following criteria: a load run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test i,1 which a diesel ger'erator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).
Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 16
O DG 1 Failures /25 Domands O
oG.2 Failurr.s/25 comands 5-
- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4.5 -
4-3.5 -
3-2.5 -
2 2-w h
1,5 - g I- $a 0.5 - W h o 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0
1 Nov90 Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)
This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emerger.cy diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This ti;gger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.
It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, cortain actions wil:
take placo in the event that any one emergency dissol generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. Those actions are described in the Definition Su,lon. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhot.n Station to institutionalire and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.
Diesel Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.
Diesel Generator DG-2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.
Data Sourco: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 17
y 400-rd April 1991 Outstanding MU h l
May1991 Outstandin0 MWO's June 1991 Outstanding MWO's 300 -
J 4
U 200-
%4 l.
W w
g
~
i.
100-i
- M
<g--
-q 3
kSi
' $p[
My l:
d
?!%
f nii L
Edd '
I# 'I l##2 i
0 I
I I
4 1
0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months
>12 Months e
AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON -
OUTAGE)
. This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders
' (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month,
' Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Aoverse Trend: None t
5 t
t-i
~
i f
18
400-3 April 1991 O May 1991 9 June 1991 350-300-
[
v/.
Yh:
250-
- p/;j
/.
200-M
'5 -
//7 100-L f,/,3 lh, n
f.-
t 50 -
!'/./M}&g (k:
4
$f:L kk'2M Vi;
//,
//,
/, '&
g_
i i
i i
i Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs >
MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)
Thit, indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWC/s remaining open at the end of the reporting month, a!ong with a breakdown by several key categories.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 19
l Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old
~
C. Industry Upper Quartile 70%-
GOOD V
60%-
50%-
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
40%-
s
~
g 30%-
20 %
- Jul90. Aug-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.
The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were
- greater than three months old at the end of June was reported as 38.7%.
The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper.-
- quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 20-
-4 Ratio of Preventive to Total Malotenance -
- ~
O Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)
A Fort Calhoun Goal (60%)
=
gn _
GOOD 70%-
4
~
b
$Yb b~
b \\ b b
b b
5:
b 50%-
40%-
30%-
20 %
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 R ATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)
The ratio of proventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non cutage maintenance.
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 50.1% in June.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.
The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %
- Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverste Trend; None 21
4%-
Preventive Maintenance items Overdue
-O-Industry Upper Quartito
--O~
Fcrt Calhoun Goaf 3%-
GOOD 2%-
V O
O O
O- --G--C D
C O
O O
O 1%-
x 0%
Jul90 - Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-grams require.
During June 1991,957 PM items were completed. ' All PM's were completed within the allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.
The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.
Data Source: Patterson/Unden (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 22
- W.
I o
t7 O
IMAGE EVALUATION
/
\\/////
[%
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
's
/
\\
c,,
$, g,O kyg j$
4 y
' l.0 m
ll!!! l.8
!!m =sa 1.25 l 1.4
%;;I 1.6
=
4-150mm 6"
f$?
/
h f' h
&jk y,,p
+
////p ot>7 gj 7777
-*Y
,j'/,f//
N IMAGE EVALUATION
[O o,
' g' f
TEST TARGET (MT-3) g
@+yg,*
%{<>f l.0 m
1.
El 2.0 l
l,l Lua l--
lHi 1.8
!!Ms 1.25 I l.4
!!j l.6
!=_.
n==
4---
150mm I
4-_-
6~
44%
hh
}
- fgr 4
se w
>>e h
p p
q
A 1
f IMAGE EVAL.U ATION gg\\g/#
'g
/
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
A
'h N,
!f
/7gr g-I.0 a2 2.0 l,l x-=
sO4 1.25
!! l.4 if L6 itses b 4
___ _ _ _ _ ____. ---- - - 1 5 0 m m 4______.._____.__
6"
_ _ _ _ _ --~ ~-- >
k j ?f
- fcQ, fh
,y
///p e
O 3
3
.gg
P s'>
=
~
IMAGE EVALUATION
+
^g
/
TEST TARGET (MT-3) b
, sb,
jpg
- -4 f
q v
~
I.0
.22 n 2.0 l1.!
l e t8 a=
l.25 l I.4 lli 1.6 i
w=
4__
150mm - - - -
4__.---
6"
- N'qy, l'$*/h
////h
( 4,7,y,
' +
ti,
C I
E Number of C. R. Instruments Fepairable On-Line 3
-O Totai Controi ncom instruments Out of. Service 50
-CF-Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Service instruments
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of Service Instruments 40-30-g g,_g,g_g%_7_o 7
20 -
l' g
=
g
,g, g
- ,gjjj 10-p$-;,'i-g-g d-o-
4-o o
o l
o f
YA
( -
i w
e u
9 i
i i
i i
a i
i 4
a i
i Jul90 Aug-Sep-Oct Nov Dec Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS
- This indicator shows the number of out-of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on-line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Foo Cal',oun goal.
There was a total of 32 cut of wrvice :ontrol roorn instruments at the end of June. A plant outage is required to repair S ut those 32 control room instruments.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out of-service control room inritruments.
The industry upper quartile value for the number of out of service control room instru-ments is 7.
Data Source:- Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 23
80%'
' - Maintenance Overtime 70%-
--X-12 Month Average
--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 60% -
V 50%-
40% -
30% -
C O
O O
O O
-C O
O O
O O
i 20% -
u s,
x X
X t'
X
~
10%-
m, c7 0%
Jul90 Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
4 The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 9.2%
during the month of June 1991, The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours
- with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.8%.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been
- set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
' Adverse Tre.d: None 24
- - ~. -
-m...,
y,,.
-g-
,,_._,,,.,,,,n-,
,,,g.,,,.,,,7,m.,,
,,yyn.,y,,-m,,.
m m.-em,, y.p e e p -,.m p
15-i O Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Mainte..ance)
O ciosed iR s Reiated to the use of Procedures (Maintenance)
O Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10 --
5-b
~
4 33 3
3 3
2 2
11 1
11 11 1
0 000 000 0
0 0 000 000 000 4
4 i
i i
i 4
4 4
I i
I Ju!90 Aug Seo Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance Incidents Reports (IR's) that are related to the use of crocedures the number of closed IR's that are related to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural noncerupliance.
Data Source. Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 25
~
t
- 800 -
Open MWO's
=@-
Fort Calhoun Goal 600 -
-C
^
n v
v w
s 430 423 400-l 406 l
361 348
[
]
- 293 302 289 287 l
l L
4
~
~
200 -
l.
I
,~
5 '
0-i Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov-Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.
The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance
- work orders remaining open.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
- Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 26
Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)
--O-Fort Calhoun Goal
- 100%-
80%-
C O
O O
O O
O 0
0 0
0 0
y 60%
4/6 4/13 4/20. 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 i/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 Br21 6/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)
Th!s iridicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibra-tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 93%
Week 2 65 %
Week 3_
78 %
Week 4 77 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 b
27
Completed Scheduled Activities (PE)
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -
~
80%-
C O
O O
b l
1 60% -
j i
i i
e 40%
4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25.5/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28
- PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVIT!ES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, J
calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is'80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities
- Week 1 97 %
Week 2 73 %
Week 3 89 %
Week 4 -
' 80%
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
. Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 28
Completed Schedulod Activities (GM)
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -
80% -
C
---C O
O O
60% -
40%
4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 S/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activites as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activites concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 90 %
Week 2 87 %
Week 3 60 %
Week 4 53%
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29
Completed Scheduled Activities (MM)
--O--
Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -
-80%-
C O
O O
O O
O t-60%-
40 %
4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the pecent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance, Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, STs, PMO's, calibra-tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activites.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities
~ Week 1 97 %
Week 2 56 %
Week 3 70 %
Week 4 84 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33
-30 q
1
e
- Completed Scheduled Activities (10) Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -
__ d 80%-
C O
O O
O O
O O
O O
60%-
40%
4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibra-
. tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
~
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%
Reporting. Month Completed Scheduled Activities
- Week 1 98%
Week 2 86 %
. Week 3 85%
Week 4 87%
. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31
. _. ~
3
@ Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 1-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i
'89
'90 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.
During the month of June 1991, there were no missed STs that resulted in LER's.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER's)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l
l I
l 32 l
20-E TotalNPRDS Component Failures O Confirrned NPRDS Component Failures 10-77 55
-5 5 4
4 33 3
3 22 0
i l
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
Jul90 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
/.pr May Jun91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reporte sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.
During June 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 33 I
i 15-
_.--- Components With More Than One Failure
--X-Cornponents With More Than Two Failures 10-GOOD V
5-
/
C N
X X
X y
X N
~
O m
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.
This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.
During the last 12 reporting months there were 5 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. Two (2) of the 5 components had more than two failures. The tag numbers of these components were CH-1 A and CH-1B.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 34 I..:. -
l 20-Check Valve Failure Rate pcr Million Cornp. Hours
]
--h--
Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours 15-
--O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00E 6) 10 f
' 10-7 GOOD i
l V
A 5 --
N 1
O O
O m,
I i
i
'89 90 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.
The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.
For March 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.52E-7 while the industry repor1ed an actual failure rate of 2.54E-6. At the end of June, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of 1.96E-6. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00E-6.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 35
~
9 Secondary Systtm CPI Secondary System CPI Limit GOOD
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (.45) 1.5 -
Y
-e-Industry Upper Quartile 1-l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l 0.38 - c 34 7
m 0-3 7
N h
O j y
.m 0
'89
- 80 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 200 -
175-146.1
--M-Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 150~i GOOD 125-100-y 75-50-25-m m
m g
'90 -
Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown,-
sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters excaeding the -
Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPIis 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.291 for the month of May. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August-1989 through Dec.1989.- The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.
The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> for the report-ing month.
The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)-
' Adverse Trend: None 36
10%-
-M-Primary System Chemistry Out of Umit
-O--
Fort Calhoun Goal 8%-
6%-
GOOD v
4%-
19 1.8 R
2%-
C O
O O
O E, 0%
m'-
'm m
r
'89 '90
-Jun90 Jul Aug Sep.Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT
-The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%,
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0% for the month of May.
The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July
- was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher percentaDe of hours out of limit.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 37
4 10-9-
% Ho% Auxibry System Chemistry Out Of Limit 4.-
Industry Upper Quasile 8-7-
GOOD 6-lY 5-4-
3 --
2-1-
0~
0 o
- , ;, 3_, 3 i;,;;;
p i
'.89 '90 Jun90 Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Mt 91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicatoris one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as 0 for the month'of May.
1 The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limbs is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 38
Number of instruments Out of Servico 8
-O--
Fort Calhoun Goal 8-
~
L '
7 7
7 I~
.]
"Y" R
","A hji
)
, l 6
- x J
W 1,
6 gf
.6 M
O O
bgM 6
I 'l I
f,//J g
f 5
5 5-l
'j l,j, j g
j g
R R k M
?.
l ;
4-ye,;j i
l
. g; lj'j WA m:
- s h
b I
3-21 1
.L fjj W
feli
~
- g i
i; gj ::; ?! lj 9j ij g )M'#5 gvd 1; g i;
j 2-3 1
S' E
7 e'
1l 5,,;
j 9j
~
Vf 0
h'?
j h':
1-
!['f h i
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
At the and of June there was a total of 3 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-oi-service. Of these 3 instruments,1 was from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 6. Six out-of service chemistry instruments make up 10%
of all the chemistry instruments counted for this indicator.
Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: Nona 39
=.
d Total Waste Produced (Kilograms)
Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-800-600-400-222.2 200 -
144.5 7/
89.8 j
70 4 0 -- * --,
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.
During the month of June,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced,4.9 kilograms.of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.
Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)
'T Adverse Trend: None 1
40
5000-OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem) i O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) 3000-E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-1000-901 559 j;hM?y0$5d[$8 h
0-June 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During June 1991, an individual accumulated 424 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposure for the month.
The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1991 has been 559 mrem.
The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 901 mrem.
The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /
year.
Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 41
250-237 D
Monthly Personnel Contaminations GOOD Cumulative Personnel Contaminations 200-y
-O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)
--G-Industry Upper Quartile (129) 157 150-O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
100-C O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
50-9 i -- - - 7
, 0 i
'89
'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 32 cumulative contaminatione have occurred during 1991 There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.
The 1991 goal for skin and clothing is 90 contaminations.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 42
100%'- -
Decontaminated Auxiliary Building / Radiation Controlled Area
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 90%-
/
.l
=
w o
o'c c
c c
c c
m
^
80%-
A 70%-
GOOD 60%-
50%
Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Area") has been revised to include the new Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be con-i sidered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA which is
)
decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85%
- decontaminated for the auxiliary building (non-outage' months) and a goal of 75% de-l_
contaminated for the auxiliary building (outags months).
As of the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.
Date Source: Patterson/Gundal(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None.
SEP54 i
=
43
........~. -
10- @ Number if Identified PRWP's i
t 6-4-
2 2-m 1
1 1
1 1'
l 0
0 0-0
'O O
i i
i i
i i
4
- i i
i i
Jul90 Aug.' Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun91
~
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Progam Indicator shows the number cf Poor Radio --
4-logical Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reporting month, e
' Th'e number of PRWP's which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to ' qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological 4
[
performance,-
~ During the month of June 1991, no (0) PRWPs were identified.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
- Adverse Trend: None SEP52
,e 44
-..m..
... +,,, -
-c.,.
,--.-.,-,,,,.._...n,-,,m.e,
-+,,,_.-v
.,e,-
4 76~
@ Total Number of Hot Spots Number of Additional Hot Spots identified 53 53 53 SJ SJ 54 g,..
50-e
$j j!
h i
)
fi
'fi j
f g
ti i
g.
i h
Si 9
25-
'$j j{l j.
j fjj
[!
j!
(fj
- s E
.c f'j
[4]
$z
- s U
Tf f
(
10 l; l!
9 j
g g
- s 3
0 0
h O
j 0 1
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.
A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.
Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None 45
8 Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800-Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 785
--O-Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600-GOOD l y
~
400-C O
O O
O O
O O
O h
O
=
~
164 4
u
,-, % _....rm c
o r-i r
eo
'88
'89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1990 through December 1990. - A total of 465.3 curies have been released to the environment from January through December of 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal was 360 curies for this indicator.
The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February 1990 was due to a containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
I Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 46
l Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged 300-
+ Cumulative AnnualGoal 228 231 228 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O r7 m
A n
p 200-m
$ 4] g
.g l GOOD l e.e &g w
3 E
s}jb W~ d,
100- 0 V
54.8 M
$2
'T if
,j 4
4 3
3 g h
6 04 i
a 1
i i
i i
i i
i i
4 i
i i
i
'87
'88
'89 Jh'190 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 E 40000-S 35000 -
y 30000-g 25000-m 20000-E 15000-
@ 10000-
/4654 3410 3510 3250 3280 4170 3
5000 - 3198 2834
, A y p p m, A,2070
.O Am 185 206 497 0
g i
i i
i i
i i
i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of January 1990 through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 175.5 curies from January through December 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 curies.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released form the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 20.7 million gallons from January through De-cember 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment in-cludes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being dis-charged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 47
30-L gg ble/ Reportable incidents (Does not GOOD 25-Include System Failures) 20-15-10-
- ~
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jur. c 120-Security System Failures l GOOD l 80-V 40-0 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June 91 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents con-cerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's); Security Badget; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurred during the reporting month.
Duri." the month of June 1991, there were 71 loggable/ reportable incidents identified.
Systen..ailures accounted for 70 (98%) of the loggable/recortable incidents, and of those,49 (70%) were environmental failures. Poor weather conditions were a major factor in system failures for the month. The remaining non system loggable incident involved the loss of a security badge. Security Services, Plant Maintenance, and Sys-tem Engineering continue to pursue improved methods to reduce our environmental failurss.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 l
l 48 l
e E Security Report / Log incidents March 1991 16-O Security Report / Log incidents April 1991 E Security Report / Log Incidents May 1991 O Security Report / Log incidents June 1991 12-GOOD Month Iotalincidents y
Jan '91 6
Feb '91 0
Mar 91 2
8-Apr '91 3
May '91 1
Jun 91 1
4-2l 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
i i
I LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) Security Badges; Access Control and Authorization; and Security Key Control.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49
50-O EnvironmentalFailures O System Failures 40-34 GOOD 30-V 20-15 10-
^
6 4
2 2
- g
.i 0 lt sl 0 le s; O
0 0
s Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip.
Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents conceming the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and system failures.
Number of incidents:
May 91 June 31 System Failures Env. Fail.
Ecuio. Fail.
Env. Fai!.
Eculo. Fail Alarm Systems 6
9 15 7
CCTV 27 3
34 6
Computer n/a 1
n/a 2
Search Equipment n/a 4
n/a 2
Door Hardware -
n/a 8
n'a 4
Card Reader rua 0
n'a O
Total 33 25 49 21 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 50
Amount of Work On Hold Awalting Parts
~.
9%-
-O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%-
GOOD 7%-
6%-
5%-
5%
4%
N,
4%
4%
4%
4% f
_ 4%
\\
4%-
h
,7 "4
4%
4 4.
4%
3%-
3%
2%-
1%-
0%
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct
. iN Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 AMOUNT OF V'ORK ON HOLD AWAITif4G PARTS (NON OUTAGE)
This procurement Indicator dispicys the amount of open, non outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts to the total amount of open, non outage, mainte-nance items, expressed as a percentage.
There was a total of 728 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 25 of these items on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.
The 1991 Fc1 Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.43% of the total number of open non-outage maintenance items awaiting parts.
Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)
Adverso Trend: None 51
15-
- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 12-9-
6:
Jul00 Aug Sep Oct N >v Dec Jan Feb Mar.
Apr May Jun91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of June was reported as $13,086,087.
Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 500-400-Spare Paris issued ($ Thousands) 300-0-
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during June totaled $127,324.
Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 52 m -...
Inventory Accuracy
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (90%)
100% -
95%-
90%-
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June 91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.
During June,615 different line items were counted in the warehouso. Of the 615 line items counted,2 items needed count adjustments. 'he inventoy accuracy for the month of June was reported as 100%. The Fort Ca, ouri goal for this indicator is 98%.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None
[','[
% of Pick Tickets Generated Wah Pans Not Available 5.
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 4
3%-
2%-
1%-
0%
O O
O O
O-Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.
During June, a total of 1042 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1042 Pick Tickets generated 67 Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available.
The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal for Pick Tickets generated with no parts available is 0%.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 53
2b
% of Total Purchases that are Expedited
--O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)
10 C
O O
O O
O 0%
Jul90 Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma' Apr M9y Jun91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.
During June, there was a total of 347 purchase orders generated. Of tho 347 purchase orders generated, there was one (1) expedited purchase.
The Fort Calhoun 00a1 br this indiccior 0.5%.
Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 54-
_ - = _ _ _ _
i
100-80-00 -
40-20 --
m i~"'
0 i
i i
Service invoices COE invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of servico invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of June 1991.
Dato Source: Wiltrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None Percentage of Material Requests for issues with
~
the Reauest Dato the same as the Need Date 100 % -
80%-
60%-
~M g
40%-
20%-
0%
Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June 91 MATERIAL RE. QUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) forirsues with their re-quest date the same as their need dato compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.
During the month of June, a total of 1042 MR's were rocoived by the warehouse. Of the 1042 total MR's received by the warehouse,349 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 55
600-
- TotalModification Packages Open 500-425 425 -
400-l 337
't
. I, N
300-i 1200
'88 '89 SO Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 ObTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-
. Ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).
Cateaory Reoortina Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 18 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 98 1
Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 103
' =
Construction Backicfin Progress
.27 Desian Enar Undate nackloaMn Procrets 55 Total 301
. As'of the end of June,19 odditional modification requests have been issuad this year and 17 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-rnittee_ (NPRC) has completed - 66 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 80 backlog modification request -
reviews this year.
b Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)
Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 56
.t
.-. _.-.. _,.~.~, -.-., -. -.. - -.. - -.
100-Total Temporary Modifications
~
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 60-40-20-C U
V U
U O
O O
O O
O O
0=
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 April 1991 O May 1991 5 June 1991 10-8 >
8-7 7
7y G
q6 6
7 pg 6-i gg
},
9&
4
}
{Rj A
f j::'
t;et 3
a-n.
2
=2 qgg;;
4 g,,;;
j
.f 1
u.
2-dj
.j id
[3
-Q 0
ff i
i i
i i
0 3 Months 3 6 Month:
6 9 Months 912 Months
> 12 Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDitJG SCAFFOLDING)
The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications (TM's) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and the Fort Calhoun goal. The bottorn graph shows the age of all installed TM's in the plant for the respective month, At the end of June, there was a total of 27 TM's installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.15
'of the 27 installed TM's require an outage for removal. The current Fort Calnoun goal for the total number of installed TM's is less than 15.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend Temporary modifications greater than twelve months old continue to increase due to the need for outage conditions to remove the item. Currer.tly 15 tempo-rary modifications require an outage for removal.
SEP 62 & 71 57
E
.=
- Total Number of Open EAR's 200 -
150 -
100-FO-0-
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 60-O DEN 0 3 months O SE 0-3 months 50-C DEN 3 6 months
@ SE 3 6 months 40-O DEN >6 months O SE >6 months 30-27 20-18 10 10 8
8 10-5-
6 6 6
6 00 0
i i
i i
Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR's)
The top graph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end of the reporting month.
The bottom graph shows the EAR's by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reporting month.
The decrease in open EAR's at the end of May resulted from a review of the backlog.
This review found many had been closed or cancelled which were incorrectly updated in AMRTS and counted as open.
There was a total of 125 open EAR's at the end of June. Of the 125 total open EAR's, 99 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility and 26 were System Engineering's responsibility.
Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)
SEP 62 Adverse Trend: None 58
--O-ECN's Backlogged in DEN l
ECN's Opened During the Month
--G-ECN's Completed During the Month 150-100-50-W i
i O
^
0 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Ju*
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECN's opened during the reporting rnonth, and the number of ECN's completed by DEN during the repolling month.
At the end of June 1991, there was a total of 196 DEN basklogged open ECN's. There were 38 ECN's opened, and 31 ECN's completed during the month.
Although the number of open ECN's is currently high, activities are in progress to re-duce the backlog of open ECN's. It is expected that in several months the number of open ECN's will begin to decrease, Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 59
@ Document Changes O Substitute Replacement item 350-O FacilityChanges g
Q No Type Assignment 300-
</))
! 259 250-i 94 200-150-
)
4.y F
100-79
'j p
1'""56 i
50-
,1, i
n 0-TotalOpen ECN's Opened ECN's Completed ECN's Total ECN's Reevd ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open awaiting completion by Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of ECN's that were completed by DEN during the repon;ng month. The total number of ECN's received by DEN since the initiation of the ECN process in 1989 is also shown.
Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 60 I
-l
1991 RecorJablo injury Frequoney Rato 5-4.7 1990 Recordable injury Frequency Rato
=tj}$f1 4.5 -
,9;i
{'I lf!(
-- 5 Year Averago Recordable injury Frequency Rato 4-me:
hh GOOD 15-M 3- M 2.73 V
2.5 -
lyg 24 2.32 2.25 g 3,j44 7 (h,'
?,${
W 59?$
h?$i Izld5[,'i 1.58'b 2-b' fff){'f; N
1.5 - [
- M/
fh f$$j 4
l'g$
ffAi l;?&wn:.
1-pp s
.x
%w j
/
0.5 -
/
0-i
-: m 1: n
n
, --- - i i
i i
i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the FCS 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.
A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to-date basis There were no (0) recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of June.
There has been a total of 6 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.
Year Recordable Qases Ye@End Rtilo 1988 11 2.0 1989 11 2.2 1990 1
2.1 Data Source: Scienson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated.
SEP 15,25 & 26 61
50-46 Licensee Event Reports O
Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
~
-s-Cumulative Licensee Event Reports a
Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 29 30-26 P
20-12 9_10-a m
~
5%{
k A
a A
D, i
i 4
60
'88
'89
'90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S Th!s indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) with event dates during the reporting month, the LER's attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the three previous years are also shown.
In June 1991, there was one (1) LER reported. - This LER was attributable to personnel error.
There have been 10 LER's reported so far in 1991 and 4 of these LER's have been attributable to personnel error, Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 62 i
---__.-----u----\\-K-
532 O Actuai civision starting 400 -
O Autn0rized Divi:; ion statting
}
200-54 52 I
I I
0 Nuclear Operatsns Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None SEP 24
-O-Nuclear Opt rations Division Turnover Rate
-- A - Production Engineering Division Turnover Rato
-o-Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate
- g+a==e-e-W=4Aaj 2 -
O--o-o-o--o-o
,.o-o- --o-o---o-o-o - o F90 M90 A90 M90 J90 JD0 ADO S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A01 M91 J01 PERSONNEL TURNOVER R ATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.
Divison Turnover Rate NOD 4.7%
PED G.5%
NSD 3.7%
Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%.
This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.
Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 63
-O-SRO Exam Pass Ratio (If Exams Administered) -
RO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administered)
-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100%-
C D
O O
80%-
60%-
40% -
20%-
0%
- NRC Generic Fund NRC Site Specific NRC Roqual OPPD Roqual SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO SRO License Examination Pass Ratio The Senior Reactor Operator.(SRO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
RO License Examination Pass Ratio The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio indicator shows the num-ber of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 100% pass ratio,
- During the month of June 1991 there were four (4) NRC administered SRO exams and 7
three (3) NRC administered RO exams given. All of these exams were passed.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source) b Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 64
l 0 SRO Exams Administered s
O SRo Exams eassed D RO Exams Administered
~
O RO Exams Passed 45-40-35-n-
~
30-25-i 20-l' m._
15-
~~
~~
10-
~l
..- y 3
I 7
5-n 0
j k
l i
i i
i Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EX AMS This indicator shows the number of Sernor Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of June 1991, six (6) SRO exams were taken and three of these exams were passed. Six (6) RO exams were taken and and all six (6) exams were passed.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 c5
Hotlines Inhiated D Hetlines Closed 35-
@ Hot!ines Overdue < 4 Weeks O Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-
~
20-
~
15-
~
~
~
10-
~~
5-l
~
n 7
l T
r n 1
0 i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.
May 1991 initiated Hollines 4
Closed Hotlines 6
Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks.
2 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks 0
Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 66
l l
i O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)
O General Ernployee Training (1000 hrs )
O Tcchnical Support (1000 Hrs.)
O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs )
0-O uaintenance (1000 Hrs.)
E Operations (1000 Hes )
~
~y~
_~.
a p
Cg 2_
m n
4
~
u
- E i"i i
0 i
j i
i May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart.
monts for the reponing month. Due to a programming problem,information for the month of May was unavailable at the time of this repon's publication.
This indicator is normally one month behind the reponing month due to the time re.
quired for data collection and processing.
DEPARTMENT M AR 91 APR 91 Operations 187 01 Maintenance 1313 712 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1770 023 Technical Support 1004 523 General Employee Training 822 422 Other 39 43 Total 5141 2584 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None 07
O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)
@ General Employee Tiaining (1000 hrs.)
O Technical Support (1000 Hrs )
C Chemit,try and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs )
30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)
25 -
@ Operations (1000 Hrs.)
20-15 -
r=
p&;c
~
r-Gij f"
M
?
w
- E a;;
L E
E El u
=
m g
O_
=
m y
~
=
Z 5-E
- E s
Z
- Z
=
=
E 0-May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr01 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Otner Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. Due to a programming problem,information for the month of May was unavailable at the time of this report's publication.
This indicator is normally one rnonth behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
DEPARTMENT MAR' APR 91 Operations 524 166 Maintenance 45N 1400 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 5543 2129 Techrncal Support 4694 2124 General Employee Training 2905 1633 Other 112 182 Total 18357 7634 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 68
- Total Outago MWO's 800- -
MWO's Ready to Work
-O--
Outage MWR Backlog 600 -
400 -
200 -
g 0
k gN A
C C
-ON O
O Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these MWO's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use.) Also included is the number of outage Maintenance Work Requests (MWR's) which have been identified for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWO's. Any MWO's written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWO's. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l
l 1
69 l
r---
Total Outage Modifications
- Mods With Planning Document Approved
--O-Mods With Final Design Approved
-+- tAods With Construction Package Approved 30-
^
^
/
20-10-e
~
0~
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING
' This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) or for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage (RFO). Additional data points will be added to this Indicator as information becomes available.
The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage is as follows.
Outage Scope Freeze * '
Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved
- Feb.22,1991 Final Designs Approved
- Apr. 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved
- June 15,1991 Schedule incorporated' July 26,1991 Material On Site
- July 26,1991 Construction Started Feb.15,1992 Construction Complete Mar. 30,1992 Accepted by SAC Apr.10,1992
- Indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the new Jan. '92 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after Nov. '91 could result in an early start date for the Cycle 13 RFO.
. Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
AdverseTrend: None SEP 31 70 l
TotalOutago Projects Projects with Preliminary Schedulos Submittod
-O-Pro}octs with Dotailed Schedules Submnted 40-30-
_N O
20-10-
/
A 0
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 OVERALL PROJECT OTATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage.
The projects that do not yet have preliminary schedules are Liquid Effluent Releases and Radiography.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
The schedule for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:
All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct.1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail June 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct. 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov.16,1991 Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71
d Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours 12-
- O-Fort Calhoun Goal 9-C O
O O
O GOOD 1
6-5 V
y 3.7 g3-N
~ l[g'O eo gO
~
~
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
'89 '89 '90 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTlON HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection repor1s per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one rnonth behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 0.79 for the month of May 1991, f
The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br /> of inspection for 1991.
There was a total of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990 which resulted in 20 violations.
Data Source: Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 72
@ Violations per 1000 Inspecion Hours (12 month Period)
~
E Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours (1991 Only) 4.03
$e#
4 2.53 w
\\N' 2.02 2R:
1 88333g s v.
(Q:
1.05 1.61
.ss 1;29 s
tq' N'
N 1.23 e
s 9
0.79 0.82 0 81
'I
' 'D NI s
0.71
,ss ss sss ss sv
$;s N
NI' lN k
lk N
NI N
Ts N
lN N
&N d '..
Ys o
s s s. s.
- s. s m
. s.
s s.
Fort Cooper River Bond Commancho Wolf Creek Arkansas SouthTexas Waterford Calhoun Peak Ono COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from June 1,1990 to May 31,1991 and for the calendar year 1991 only.
Data Source: Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None 73
75-0 Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months O Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Months 50-37 34 34 28 27
~
25-21 21 21 20 18 0
"~~
14 14 15 12 12
~
-- 1 <
11 11 2
wt 9
7 7 7
r-j
~
u n
0 o
Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)
The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCV's for the last twelve
- months, This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 74
l@
Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related
-D-Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old Total Outstanding C AR's 150-100-50-M OP O
-D3 WN %dn
+'
rr '
0 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun01 OUTSTANDlHG CORREC11VE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's),
the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related.
As of the end of June 1991, there are 120 outstanding CAR's,55 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 5 CAR's that are modification related.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 75
20-15-
--C)-
NOD Overdue CAR's 10-
--b-NOD CAR's With Extensbns Granted A
b--
0 - -C m
Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91
~
--C}-
PED Overrdue CAR's 25 -
20-
--b-PED CAR's With Extensions Granted 15-
'M fk o
m r_'
.=
n Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 6-5-
-O-Other Overdue CAR's
- ~ -
Other CAR's With Extensions Granted a
3-2-
T-h Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun9)
OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE /CTION REPORTS This indicator shows tha number of overdue CAR's and the number of CAR's that re-ceived extensions broken down by organization.
Overdue CAR's April 91 May 91 June 91 NOD 0
0 0
PED 1
1 1
Otners 0
0 0
Total 1
1 1
Extended CAR's April 91 May 91
_ June 91 NOU 8
2 1
PED 2
4 9
Others 1
1 0
Total 11 7
10 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 76
4 l
1990 SALP Funct.
Area CAR's S60ntf. C AR's NRC Wola.
LER's A) Plant Operations 62 0
2 10 B) Radiolog.
28 2
0 0
Controls C) Maint/Survell.
180 8
6 4
D) Emergency 7
0 3
0 Preparedness E) Security 26 0
5 3
F) Engr / Tect 172 5
3 12 Suppori G) Safety Assessi 29 0
0 0
Oual. Verif.
H) Othei 1
0 0
0 Tota 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.
l Area CAR's Signd. C AR's NRC Viola.
LER's
~
A) Plant Operations 10(5) 1 1
1 B) Radiolog.
7 0
0 0
Controis C) Maint/ Surveil 49(4) 0 0
2 D) Emergency 15 0
0 0
Preparedness E) Security 2(1) 0 1(1) 1 F) Engr / Tech 50(9) 1 0
5 Suppori G) Safety Assess' 14 0
0 1
Oual Verd.
H) Other 0
0 0
0 Total 153(19) 2 2
10 Note: 0 indnte value for die trpirting month.
CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.
There was one (1) violation due to personnel error during the reporting month.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Therkildson/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SdP 15,20,21 77
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR.
includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and DERS areas of the C/RP buikhng.which is decontaminated This indcator tracks the total number of outstariding cor.
bar.ed on the total square footage, rectNo non outage Maintenance Work Orders s%e i art Calhoun Station versus their age in months.
n!SABLING INJURY FREOUENCY R ATE (LO3T TtME WMNT RATE)
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS h,Es > 'is dehned as the number of accidents for This indcator is dehnod as the percentage of open, on-all uts;; n 6.
- ) permanently assigned to the stat on, outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awalt.
invoking days.
.frore erk rwr 20', $00 man hours ing parts, to the total number of open, non outage, main-worked (100 men 3 +. 1r ;.?4 not indude contrac-tenance work orders, tor personnel. 'his h
- - Jnks g vsonnel perfor.
mance for SEF #20.
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS DOCUMENT REVChisNNiAJ, The cumulative hours that the Component Coolmg Water The Document Review in1icator shows the number of system is outside the staten chemistry hmit. The hours documents reviewed,il e tumber of documents sched-are accumulatM ' 'm the first sample onceedit g the limit gled for review, and thr n imber of document reviews until addnional skmpimg shows the parameter to be back that are overdue for th6 r4 porting month. A document wnhin limas.
review is r onsidered ove,due if the review is not com-ptete wnhin 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLA. - cator tracks performance for SEP 446.
DONSysLERsREPORTED Provides a comparison of CARS issuad. NRC violations, EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABib and LERs reported.
ITY This indicator shows the number of failures that were CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-The Fort Calhoun check vake failure rate and the indus+
sol generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also -
try check vake f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 millicl) compo-shown are Ingger values which correlate to a high level nont hours). The data for the industry f ailurc rate is three of conhdence that a unit's diesel generators have ob-months behind the Pl Report reporting month. This indi-tained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when cator tracks performance for SEP #43.
the demand f ailures are less than the Ingger values.
- 1) Number of Start Demands: All valid and inadvertent COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV start demands, includin0 all start only umands and all PLANTS star 1 demands that are followed by load-run demands, Provides data on violations per 1000 inspection hours for whether by automatic or manualimtiaton. A start only Region IV nuclear power plants, demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but ou anempt is made to load the generator, r
CORRECTIVE MAINTENAICE b%CKLOG GREATER
- 2) Number of Start Failures: Any failure within the emer.
THAN 3 MONTHS OLD gency generator system that prevents the generatnr from The percentage of total outstant, ng corrective mainte-achieving specified frequency and voltage is classihed as nance noms, not requiring an outage, that are greater a valid start f ailure. This includes any cotidition identihed than three months old at the end of the perod reported, in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emer.
gency generator in standby mode) that definhely would COMULAllVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA.
have resutted in a start f ailure if a demand had occurred.
TIONS(12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)
- 3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a vahd load-run The cumutative number of violations and Non-Cited Vo-demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet
- lations for the last 12 months.
one or more of the following craeria:
A)A load run of any duration that results from a real auto.
DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT mate or ma'ualinitiaton.
This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as B)A load run test to utisfy the plant's load and duration measured from comp f or point XC105 (in thermal megd at stated in each test's specifications, watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet C
er special tests in whch the emergency generator portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting is, pected to be operated for at least one hour wh!!o month are also shown.
loaded with at least 50% of its design load DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED
- 4) Number of Load Run Failures: A load run f ailure AREA should be counted for any reason in which the emer.
The percentage of the Radiaton Cor. trolled Area, which gency generator does not pick up load and run as pre-78 T
T F
er F
+5 y
ggwp'*y yw m-w rt--g e gg-ppyer
^*&
q,=,p'e wmme
-s-q--.m-,
p
-,,-g-varr=w---ey-rgeag-e e m-weg og -g-ge--w c'yev-g yy-
-=-g-w
+er tw-1+M war'v's%p% e t v7'$m+*-Wr'WT-9F"'"WT'97'W
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) deted. Failures are counted during any vahd load run produced by a unit in a given pered if operated cortino-demands.
ously at maximum capacity.
5)ExceptonsUnsuccessful attempt to start or load run EXPEDITED PURCHASES should not be counted as vahd demands or f ailures when The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred they can be attributed to any of the following; during the reporting month compared to the total number A)Spurous trips that would be bypassed in the event of of purchase orders generated.
an emergency.
B)Ma! function of equipment that is not required dunng an FORCED OUTAGE RATE emergency.
This indicator is dehned as the percentage of time that C)lntentional termination of a test because of abnormal the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared conchtions that would not have resulted in major d ese!
to the time planned for electreal generaton. Forced generator damage or repair, events are f ailures or other unplanned cond; tons that D)Mattunctions or t>perating errors which would have not require removing the unit from service before the end of prevented the emergency generator from being restaned the next weekend Forced events include startup failures and brought to load within a f ew minutes, and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown E)A failure to start because a podon of the starting sys-(i e., the unit is available but not in servce).
tem was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a suc-cessful start with the starting system in its normal abgn-FUEL RELI ABILITY INDICATOR ment.
This indicator is dehned as the steady-state primary coc,l-Each emergency generator failure that results in the gen-ant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contn-erator being declared inoperable should be counted as buton and normahzed to a common purif caton one domand and one f ailure. Exploratory tests during rate. Tramp uranium is f uei which has been deposited on corrective maintenance and the successful test that fol-reactor core internals f rom previous defective f uel or is lows repair to verify operabihty should not be coanted as present on the surf ace of tuel elements from the manu-demands or f ailures wnen the EDG has not been de-f actunng process. Steady state is dehned as continuous clared operable again.
operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK-letdown punication rate. The FRl has also been calcu-DOWN lated using FCS's actualletdown punicaton rate. These This indicator breaks down the number of Engineenng calculatons revealed that the use of the plant's actual Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open awaiting rate wovH esult in an approximate 45% increase in FRi completion by Design Engineenng Nuclear (DEN), the data.
number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of ECN's that were completed by DEN during the reporting GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE EEING DIS-month. The total number of ECN's roceived by DEN CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT since the initiation of the ECN process in 1909 are also This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all shown. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.
gaseous radioactive nuchdes released f rom FCS.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECH) STATU'.i GROSS HEAT RATE The number of ECN's that were opened, completed, and Gross haat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal open backlog ECN's awaiting completion by DEN, for the energy in Bntish Thermal Unns (BTU) produced by the reporting month. This indcator tracks performance f or reactor to the total gross electncal energy produced by SEP #62.
the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH)
EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITI-HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED CAL HOURS The tota' amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenatec haz-Equipment forced outages per 1000 cntical hours is the ardous w.ste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other inverse cf the mean time between forced outages hazardcas wasts produced by FCS each month.
caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is criticalin a perod HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the rmmber of forced outages The number of riothne Training Memos (HTM) that are caused by equipment f ailures in that perod.
initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater then 4 weeks for the indcated month. A HTM is a tra:ning docu.
EOUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be This indicator is def ned as the ratio of gross available reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM.
generaton to gross maximum generaton, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory hmi-tatens. Maximum generaton is the energy that can be 79
. - - - - -.. - ~ - - - -. - -
4 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) main open at the end of the reporting month This ind ca-HOURS CHEMISTRY 15 OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP tot tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36.
GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters MAINTENANCE OVERTIME exceeding guidelines during power oper tion. Power
- The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for operation is defined as greater than 30% power, The 13 maintenancJ. This includes OPPD personnel as well as parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cat on con-contract personnel.
ductivity, boron s'hca, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING condensate pump discharge dissolved orygen.
The percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with 3
their request date the same as their need date compared IN LINE CHEMtSTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER-to the total nurr'ber of MR's.
VICE Total number of in line chemistry instruments that are MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE out-of service in the Secondary System and the Post The total maximum amount of radiation received by an Accident Sampling System (PASS).
individual person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
INVENTORY ACCURACY The percentage of line items that are counted each MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.
OUTAGE)
The total number of Maintenance Work Ordsrs (MWO's)
INVOICE BREAKDOWN that have been wntten for completion dunng the Cycle 13 The number of invoices that are on holo due to shelf hfe, Refueling Outage. MWO's which are wrrnen after the COE, and miscellanecas reasons.
Start of the Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent MWO's. Also shown is the number of MWR's which have LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS been identified for the Cycle 13 Refuehng Outage, but This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz-have not yet been converted to MWO's. This indicator zes and exams that are administered and passed each tracks performance for SEP #31.
month. The License Candidate Exams Indicator tracks Training performance for SEP #68.
NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS The number of radiological hot spots which have been LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of TO THE ENVIRONMENT the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocahzed This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive sourc( of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, dose rate of ha item is at least 5 times the General Area to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio-dose raie and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater active nuclides are detected in the blowdown system.
than 100 mrem /hcur.
The curies f rom all releases f rom FCS to the Missouri River are also shown.
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo-The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting nent failures (confirmed and possible) and the number of month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu-confirmed NPRDS component f ailures. The total number rity performance for SEP#58, of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that nave been sent to the institute of MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), Confirmed NPRDS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System component failures are based upon f ailure reports that (NPRDS) components with more than 1 failure and the have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo.
. number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failures nent failures are based upnn f ailure reports that are still during the last 12 months.
under review by INPO. NPRDS is a utihty industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG -
implemented at FCS.
The number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM month. This indicator was added to the Pl Report to INSTRUMENTS trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or.
A control room instrument that cannot perform its design ders as stated in SEP #36.
function is considered as out of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (MWO) wntten for it and has not been repaired by the This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage l
maintenance work orders by several categories that re-i l
80 i
O PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) end of the reporting pered is considered out-of service
- 4) Construction Backlog!!n Progress The Constructon and will be counted. The duration of the out of smice Package has been issued or construction has begun but conditon is nr.t considered. Computer CRTs are not con-the mod:fcation has not been accepted by the System
- sidered as control roorn instruments.
Acceptance Commates (SAC).
) Design Engineering Update Backlog'In ProgressPED NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN has received the Moddcaton Comp leton Report but the LER'S dri, Nings have not been updated.
The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed The Aove mento99d outstanding modificatons do not to personnel error on the onginal LER submittal. This include i ndificatons which are proposed for cancella-indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15-ton.
NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE-OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS REFUELING OUTAGE)
The numtser of Su veillance Tests (STs) that result in The number of p'ojects which affect the scope of the Licensee Event Reports (LER's) dunng the reportin9 Cycle 13 Refusing Outage and the number of projects month. This indcator tracks mk, sed ST's for SEP's #60 for which detailed schedules have been submeted. This and #61.
indcator tracks performance for SEP #31, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to-date budget compared to the actual expen-OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION ditures for Operatens and Maintent.ncs departments.
REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective tetion Reports OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS (CAR's) and the number of CAR's which received exten-This indicator displays the total number of outstandin9 sons broken down by organizaton for the last 6 months Correctrve Action Reports (CAR's), the number of C AR's that are older than six months and the number of modifi-PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE-cation related CAR's.
NANCE ACTIVITIES The % of the number of completed maintenance activi-OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE' ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte.
QUESTS (EAR's) nance activities each week. This % is shown for each The total number of open EAR's and the number of open maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include EAR's broken down by their age in months. This indca-MWR's, MWO's, ST s, PMO's, calib ations, and other tor tracks performance for SEP #62.
miscellaneous activities. These indcators track Mainte-OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modifcation Requests (MR'S)in any PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA-state between the issuance of a Modifcation Number T1VE) an:1 the completion of the drawing update, Collective rad:aton exposure is the total external whole-
- 1) Form FC-1133 Backlogiln ProgressThe Form FC 1133 body dose received by all on-site personnel (including has not been plant approved.
contractors and visitors) dunng a time period, as moa-2)Modifcation Requests Being ReviewedTMs category sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col.
includes:
lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man.
A.)Modifcaton Requests that are not yet reviewed rem. This indicator tracks radological work performance B.)Modif cation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear for SEP #54.
Projects Review Commrttee (NPRC)
C.)Modifcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE Projects Committee (NPC)
The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employ-These Modification Aaquests may be reviewed several ment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resig-
- imes before they are approved for accomplishment or naten from the company. Retirement, death, termination, cancellnct. Some of these Modifcation Requests are re-transfers within the company, and part time employees turned to Engineering for more inform-
- n, some ap' are not considered in tumover.
proved for evaluaton, some approvr.or study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modi-This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte-fication Requests may be approved for accomplishment nance items in the month that were not completed by the wah a year assigned for construction or they may be can-celled. All of these different phases require review.
- 3) Design Engineering Backlog!!n Progress Nuclear Plan-ning has assoned a year in which constructor'. wdl be completed ai design work may be in progress.
81
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
= scheduled date plus a grace period equalto 25 percent of the scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE maintenance activities for SEP #41.
O DEX(CONTINUED)
The CPI is calculated using the following equation: cpl.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT
((KCO.8) + (NC20) + (0,/10)) / 3 Where the following are OF UMIT monthly averages of; Ka - average blowdown cation The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry conductivityNa = average blowdown sodium concentra-parameters divided by the total number of hours possible tion O, average condensate pump discharD8 d85-for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, solved oxygen concentration.
Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRIlimits are used.
SECURITY INCir)ENTS BREAKDOWN The number of Security loggablereportable incidents is PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS broken down into the following categories:
(MAINTENANCE)
- 1) Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs)lncidents related The number o,' identified incidents concerning mainte-to the use of LDVs, e g., keys left in the vehicle, loss of y
nance procedural problems, the number of closed IR's keys, or f ailure to retum keys.
related to the use of procedures (includes the number of
- 2) Security Badgesincidents associated wah improper closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance), and use and handling of security badges, incidents include the number of closed procedural noncompliance IR's, securtry badges that are lost, taken out of the protected This indcator trends personnel periormance for SEP #15 area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or and #41, broken.
- 3) Access Controland AuthorizationAdministrative and PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION procedural errors associated with the use of the card-PLANNING access system such as tailgating, incorrect securny The number of modifcations approved for planning (to badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also determine f easibility) for completion during the Cycle 13 includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for authorization information entered into the security sys-SEP #31.
tem computer.
- 4) Security Key Controllncidents involving Security key P.ADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM control, e.g., lost Securny keys. Security keys removed The number of identified poor radiological work practces from site, or failure to return Secunty keys. This type of a
(PRWP) for the repo. ting month. This indicator tracks event does not reflect incidents conceing LOV radiological work performance for SEP #52.
keys.This indcator tracks secunty periormance for SEP
- 58.
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveil.
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES lance testing and calibratiors procedures) to the sum of incidents involymg alarm systom f ailures, CCTV f ailures, non outage meetive maintenance and preventive main-secJrity Computer f ailures, search equipment f ailures, tenance cor, d over the reporting period. The ratio, -
door hardware failures, and card reader f ailures. These expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-system failures are further categorized as follows:
hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac-
- 1) Alarm System Failure Detection syste n events in-tivities for SEP #41.
volving false / nuisance alarms and mechanical failu*3s.
- 2) Alarm System Environmental Failures Degradations RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE to detection system performance as a result of environ-(RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) '
mental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, irost).
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first 3)CCTV Failures Mechanicalfailures to all CCTV hard-aid per 200,000 man hoers worked. This indcator trends ware components.-
personnel performance for SEP #1L and #26.
4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradatiom to CCTV performance as a resuk of environmental conditions (i.e.,
- SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE rain, snow, trost, fog, sunspots, shade).
INDEX
- 5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the multi-The Chemistry Performance index (CPI)is a calculation plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard-based on the concentration of key impunties in the,vec-ware and software. This category does not include sof t ondary side of the plant. These key impunties are the ware problems caused by operator error in using the saost likely cause of deterioration of the steam genera-
- software, tors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the
- 6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x-ray, metat, period of time greater tian 30 percent power.
or explosive detectors and other equipment esed to search for contraband, This also includes incidents where the search equipment is found defective or did not function properly during testing.
82
i PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
- 7) Docr Hardware Failures Failure of the door alarm and door hardware such as latches, electre strikes, TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS doorknobs, locks, etc.
' instruction hours administered by the Training Center.
The total number and department breakdown of training
- 8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by mechanh
(.al b:sakdown of card readers, but not improper use of the card readers. (See Access Control and TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING Authoriza. ion)This indicator tracks security performance. The total number of student hours of training for Opera-for SEP #58.
tions, Maintenance Chemistry / Radiation Protection.
Technical Support. General Employee Training, and.
SPARE PARTS ISSUED Other tra:ning conducted for FCS.
a The dollar value of the spara parts i%ed for FCS dunng j
the reportog period.
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINAT10NS 3-Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above
- SHO & RO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm p
PASS RATIO -
squared. This indcator trends personnel performance for The SRO & RO license examination pass ratio for NRC SEP#15.
administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's),
NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC adminis-UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS 4
tered license requal:fcation exams, and OPPD adminis-WHILE CRITICAL tered license requaMeat'on exams. This indicator tracks This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned au-Training performance for SEP #68.
tomatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actua-tions) that occur while the reactor is critcal. The indcator STAFFING LEVEL is further defined as follows:
The actual staffing level and the authorized staffing level
- 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Producten Engi-planned test or evolution.
neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division.
- 2) Scram means the automate shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by STATION NET GENERATION actuaton of the reactor protecton system. The scram The net generation (sum) produced by the FCS during signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoInt or the reporting month.
may have been spuriousc
- 3) Automatic means that the initial signa. that caused ac-STOCKOUT RATE tuation of the reactor protection system logic was pro-The total number of Pck Tickets that were generatec vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param.
during the reporting month and the total number of Pck eters and conditons, rather than the manual scram Tickets that were generated during the reporting month switches (or pushbuttons) In the main control room.-
with no parts available expressed as a percentage.
4)Cntcal means that during the steady stato condnion of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplcaten TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS factor (k,) was oqual to one.
The number of temparary mechanical and electrical con-
' figurations to the plant's systems.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS.
- 1) Temporary configurations are defined as electrical (INPO DEFINITION).
-_ jumpers, electrical blocks, mechancal jumpers, or me This indicator is defined as the sum of the following chanical blocks which are installed in the plar t operating safety system actuations:
systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the
- 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling PalD, schematic, connecton, wiring, or flow diagrams.
System (ECCS) actuatens that result from reaching an
- 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil.
ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibraten Pro-ECCS signal cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-are not considered as temporary modifications unless the tem actuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-
- jumper or block remains in place after the test or proce-guards bus.An unplanned safety system actuation oc.
dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or curs when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is
~ lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifi-reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signalis gen-cations.
erated (ECCS only),' and major equipment in the system
- 3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification. is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuaton Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which
.was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS EEAR's have been submitted will be considered as tem-actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pres-porary modifications untilfinal resolution of the EEAR sure injection system, the low pressure injecton system, and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently or the safety injection tanks.
recorded on the drawings.This indicator tracks temporary modificatons for SEP's #62 & #71, 83
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTilATIONS (NRC DEFINITION)
The number of safety system actuations which include (2n!r) the Hgh Pressure Safety injection System, the Low Pres sure Safety injection System, the Sr'ety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC clas-sification of safety system actuations inciudes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic sys-tems for the above safety systems are challenged.
VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sned in NRC inspecten reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspection hours. Tha violations are reported in the !
- v ' hat the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours rye 1 for each inspecton report are used as the inspection hours.
VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is dehned as the volume of low level sold radioactive waste actualty shipped for burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radcactive waste which is ivi temporary storage, the amount of radcactive oil that has been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of scid dry active waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all ra-deactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing.This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54.
84
m__
'4
'1 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Saf ety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indcators Index is to list perfor-mance indicators related to SEP ttoms with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15 Pm increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators
- Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)....
. 25 Tofal Skin and Clothing Contaminations.......................................
.42 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate.....
.. 61 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's.
.. 62 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported........ 76 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued ys NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported.
. 76 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspectiont CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Vi6tations issued vs LER's Reported..
.76 SEP Reference Number 24
' Complete Staff Studies
- Staffing Le'/2'
. 63
'SEP Referer.ce Number 25 -
- Training Program for Managers and Supervisors Implemented Disabling injury Frequency Rate.............-..............
..........11 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate......
. 61 SEP Reference Number 28 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury Frequency Rate..........
..11
- Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate......
. 61 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage).
.. 69
...g...
Progress of Cycle 13 Outage Modification Planning..
.. 70 Overall Project Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage)...............
.. 71 SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities 2
.27
. (Electrical M ainte nance).............................,
(Pressure Equipment).........
. 28 (General Maintenance).
. 29 (Mechanical Maintenance).,.
.'. 30
. (Instrumentation & Controller...._...
. 68
- SEP Reference Number 36
- Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance).
.26 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance)....
.19 85
SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total M alntenance........................................................................ 21
- Preventive Maintenance items Overdue.............................................................. 22
' SEP Reference Numbe 3 Implement the Check Vaive Test Program
. C heck Valve F allu re Rate...........................................
...-.................35 SEP Reference Number 44
- Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedures Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance).........................
....... 25 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review...,................................
.... 15 SEP Reference Nu nber 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiaticq Exposure (Cumulative).........
...............9
. Volume of Low-Les el Solid Radioactive Waste.......................................
..... 10 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations...........
.. 42 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building........................
..........43 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Logoable/ Reportable incide nts (3e reu rity)...............................,,...................... 48 Security incident Breakdown................................................
..........................49 Security System Fallures.................................
............... 5 0 SEP Reference Number 60
-_ Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports...........,........ 32 SEP Reference Number 81' Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports..........
........ 32 SEP Reference Number 82
- Establish interim System Engineers
- Temporary Modifications................
.. 57 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's)..
... 58 -
Engineering Change Notice Status.....
. 59 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown..
. 60 SEP Reference Number 68
. Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training SRO / RO License Examination Pass Ratio............................................... 64 License Candidate Exams.................................
......... 65 SEP Ref erence Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications....
.. 57 86 i
l J
(
-f REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST
- J. O, Adams R. M. Hawkins A, W. Richard R. L Andrews -
M. C. Hendrickson D. G. Ried G. L Anglehart R. R. Henning G. K. Samide W, R. Bateman -
K. R. Henry T.J.Sandene K. t > Belek J. B. Herman B. A' Schmidt A. D. Bilau G.' J. Hill S. T. Schmitz B. H. Biome :
K C. Holthaus F. C. Scofield C. N. Bloyd M. A. Howman L G. Sealock
_J. P._Bobba _
L. G. Huliska H. J. Sefick
- C. E. Boughter.
C.J. Husk D. K. Sentel M. A. Breuer K. C. Hyde P.
Sepcenko --
t C. J. Brunnert R. L. Jaworski J. W. Shannon M. W. Butt R.A.Johansen R. W. Short -
C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones J. R. Shuck J. W. Chase.
J.D.Kocy_
C. F. Simmons G. R. Chatfield J. D. Keppler E.L.Skaggs A. G. Christensen D. D. Kloock J. L. Skiles A. J. Clark J. C. Knight F. K. Smith O. J. Clayton D. M. Kobunski R. L. Sorenson
- R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause K. E. Steele J. L Connolley L J. Kripal W.
Steele-O.M, Cook J. G. Krist H. F. Sterba M. R. Core J. B. Kuhr _
G. A. Teeple S. R. Crites -
L. T. Kusek M. A. Tesar D. W. Dale L E. Labs J. J. Tesarek R. C. DeMeulmeester M. P. Lazar T. G. Therkildsen R. D. DeYoung R. C. Learch J. W. Tills D. C. Dietz S.E. Lee D. R. Trausch K.S. Dowdy-R. E. Lewis P. R. Turner J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt J. M. Uhland T. R. Dukarski:
C.'J. Linden C. F. Vanecek P. R. Dunham B. R. Livingston G. L, Van Osdel R. G. Eurich -
J. M. Lofshult J. M. Waszak H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon W. O. Weber M. A. Ferdig G. D. Mamoran G. R. Williams s
V. H. Frahm
- J. W. Marcil S. J. Willrett F. F. Franco N. L Martice
- W. C. Woemer M. T. Frans D. J. Matthews
- H. K. Fraser
-T. J. Mcivor ~
J. F. W. Friedrichsen -
K. S. McCormick S. K. Gambhlt _
R. F. Mehatfey J. K. Gasper -
R. A. Miser
^ wig. Gates K. J. Morris
. M. O. Gautier D. C. Mueller S. W. Gebers -
R. J. Mueller J. M. Glantz -
' W. L. Neal
- J. T. Gleason
- J. B. Newhouse L V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols -
D. J. Golden -
C. W, Norris D, C. Gorence J. T. O'Connor R. E, Gray -
W. W. Orr M. J. Guinn L. L Parent K. B. Guliani T. L Patterson E. R. Gundal-R. L. Phelps A. L. Gurtis L. M. Pulverenti R.H. Guy.
T. M. Reisdorft 87
o ADVERSE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT A Performance Indicator which has data representing three (3) consecutr/e months of declining periormance constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report This secton lists the indcators which show inadequacies explains the conditons under which certain indcators are as compared to the OPPD goal and indcators which showing adverse trends. Indicators with data showing an show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper apparent adverse trend which is nQ1 considerad adverse, quartile. The indcators will be compared to the industry will have an explanation whch defines why an adverse upper quartile a*. relevant to that indcator.
trend does not exist.
Gross Heat Rate (Page 6)
Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintanance This indicator is exhibiting an adverse trend based upon (Page 21) the occurrence of an increase in GHR for four consecu-The ratio of preventive to totalmaintenance was reported live months. The increases are due to the plant operat-below the Fort Calhoun goal of 60%. This rato de-ing at planned reduced power and an increase in river creased in December and January due to the high num-water temperature. It is expected that the GHR will be ber of hours in which maintenance was involved in cor-lower in the future when the plant is operated at 100%
rective maintenance violatons per 1000 manhours of
. power for an entire month.
inspecton.
Disabhno iniurv Frecuenev Rate (Lest Tre Amdent Number of Out of Service Cent ci Room Instruments Brfd (Page 23)
(Page 11)
The total number of out of servce control room instru-This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the ments for the reporting month (32)is above the Fort Safety Department (E. Skaggs) as exhibiting an adverse Calhoun goal of 15.
trend. The high rate for this indcator can be attributed to the occurrence of histoplasmosis, a work related illness.
Stoekout Rate (Page 53)
Temocra v Modmentions The number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts (Page 57) available for the months of May and June has been This indicator is exhibiting an adverse trend due to a above the Fort Calhoun goal of 0%
continuing increase in the number of temporary modrf ca-tons greater than twelve months old. These modif ca.
tions continue to increase in number due to the need for End of Management Attenton Report.
outage conditons to remove the items. Currently fifteen temporary modifeations require an outage for removal.
Reco dable Iniurv Cases Frecuency Rate PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT fh$s$n ibtor has been defined by the Manager of the Safety Department as exhibiting an adverse trend based Decontaminated Auviharv Buddino on the 5 year recordable injury frequency rate.
(Page 43)
End of Adverse Trend Report.
This indicator has been revised to include the new _
Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be considered Radiologically Controlled. The indicator title has been changed to
- Decontaminated Ra-diation Controlled Area *.
Encineerine Chance Notke 9tatus (Page 59)
The figures for the months of April and May 1991 were revised based on a clarification of the definitions of back-logged ECNs, opened ECNs, and ECNs completed for the reporting month.
Comoanson of Violations Amona Reaion IV Plants (Page 73)
This indicator has been added to the report.
End of Indcator improvement / Changes Report.
88
r o
i l
I FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES
~~
Event Date Range Production (MWH)
Cumulative (MWH)
Cycle 1 09/2693 02/0105 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/0105 05/09D5 Cycle 2 05/0995 - 10/01D6 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13n6 Cycle 3 12/13D6 09/3097 2,805,927 0,958,888 3rd RefucF 3 09/30/77 12/0997 Cycle 4 12/0997 10/1498 3,020,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/1498 12/2408 Cycle 5 12/2408 01/18/B0 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80- 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85- 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86- 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87- 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/39 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90 Cyc613#
05/29/90 02/01/92
- Planned Dates 13th Refueling #
02/01/92- 05/01/92 Cycle 14#
05/01/92 09/18/93 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15#
11/13/93 - 03/11/95 15th Refueling #
03/11/95 ^> A/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)
First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)
September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)
May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days)
Jurie 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH)
October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11)
June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988
- -