ML20073G830
| ML20073G830 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1983 |
| From: | Carr A DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Guild R GUILD, R., PALMETTO ALLIANCE |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8304180397 | |
| Download: ML20073G830 (17) | |
Text
.
REl-MD Co;ug;spONDENCR DuxE Powzn GoxPm LEGAL DEPARTMENT
' ' ' ~
R O. Bo:s: 33189 GirARY.OTTE, N. G. 28242
'83 gpg 75 f*h ALB ERT V. CAR R. JR.
rF044 37,*2870 M@svaw? OENERAL COUseSEL April 12, 1983
'l Mr. Robert Guild Attorney at Law DOCMT ?".C g _ g[]*h* "
P. O. Box 12097 Fr.00. C: UTi'.. FJ.C....... f*/
Charleston, South Carolina 29412 5D-
Dear Mr. Guild:
This will acknowledge our telephone conference of last Wednesday wherein we discussed several matters relating to the pending discovery between Applicants and Palmetto Alliance.
The following constitutes additional information in accordance with our conversation with respect to certain of Palmetto Alliance's Follow-up Interrogatories, as well as certain of your initial Interrogatcries which we have previously discussed.
Contentien 6 (Follow-up Interrogatory 7)
In addition to those NRC Inspection Reports identified at p. 21 of our March 25 Responses to your Follow-up Interrogatories, Inspection Report Nos. 50-413/80-29; 50-414/80-29 deal with, among other things, a complaint made to the NRC. As explained in our March 25 Response, and as we discussed, we have no information beyond that contained in the referenced Inspection Report, and we do not know of any further incidents which are responsive to your request.
~
(Follow-up Interrogatory 9) As we discussed, the documents responsive to this Interrogatory were available for inspection and copying on March 30; however, the identification was not then complete. At your request, last Thursday we sent to you by Federal Express (at Palmetto Alliance's Columbia l
address), the documents responsive to this Interrogatory.
Identification of these documents has been completed, and is Attachment 1 to this letter.
We also have in our possession, and have reviewed, the files of Gail Addis, Employee Relations, Duke Power Company. These files contain, among other things, notes taken by Ms. Addis during her interviews with inspectors at the initial' stages of the recourse procedures.
It appears to us that the technical concerns expressed in those notes, as well as other documents in the files, are reflected in the materials which have already been provided to you or made available in response to Interrogatories 23 and 25. Nevertheless, these documents are in our offices and, should you wish to inspect them, will be made available to you.
8304180397 830412 PDR ADDCK 05000413 D S'o 3
Mr. Robert Guild Page 2 April 12, 1983 (Original Interrogatories 23 and 25)
In an earlier conversation (on March 9 or 10) you had raised questions with regard to our response of February 28, 1983 to those Interrogatories.
In accordance with our discussions, we agreed to broaden our search for documents responsive to your request. That was done, and the widened search has recently been completed.
It included, among other things, our meetings with QA employees at Catawba. As we discussed, the documents were available for inspection March 30. However, the identification of those documents has only recently been completed. That identification is Attachments 2, 3 and 4 to this letter.
On March 14, 1983, you requested a copy of an Exit Interview for former employee Marvin Johnron (referenced at p. 35 of our February 28 Supplemental Responses).
l It has come to our attention that you were not given the final, corrected l
copy of that document. A copy of the final document is enclosed.
1 Contention 8 (Follow-u d nterro atory 231 l
We discussed a number of matters relating to'this Interrogatory and our March i
25 Response.
I 1.
Pre-employment tests You asked to see the pre-employment tests as well as the test scores for Catawba eperators. The test scores, appropriately coded, have been available for inspection since March 30.
So far as the pre-employment tests themselves are concerned, it is necessary that they be kept confidential, since to disclose them might compromise their validity. Therefore, copies of these pre-employment tests will be made available for your inspection, but only after execution of an appropriate affidavit of nondisclosure.
2.
Psychological Tests l
Copies of the tests and scores, appropriately coded, have been available for inspection and copying since March 30, 1983.
3.
Interviews You had asked a question concerning the " Applicants' Appraisal Form."
Though such form is a part of the hiring process, it is not a " test used or to be used in qualifying reactor operation applicants at Catawba." Thus, such a form, completed following an interview of a prospective employee, does not fall within the scope of your Interrogatory. Nevertheless, we will under-take to make these forms available, assuming that they exist as a part of the employee's personnel file, for inspection. The forms will be appropriately coded to protect the privacy of the individual involved.
l
Mr. Robert Guild Page 3 April 13, 1983 4.
Physical Examinations Copies of Applicants' and NRC's physical examinations have been available for inspection since March 30, 1983.
5.
Cold License Certification The full sequence of tests and test scores, appropriately coded, have been available for inspection and copying since March 30, 1983.
You also inquired about the tests and quizzes administered following individual blocks of instruction, to candidates for reactor operator licenses as they move through Applicants' training program. Ycu wanted to know if you could see a representative set of such tests or quizzes. As I stated, assuming that a representative sample can be gathered, it may be that we must ask that they be held confidential, as tc disclose these tests and quizzes would compromise their validity.
I do not yet have answers to these questions, and will have to get back to you on d.is matter.
Contention 16 (Follow-up Interrogatory 5)
You asked a cuestion regarding our respense to this Interrogatory. As stated, we are not tware of any instance in which boron concentrations have fallen below 2,000 ppm in the spent fuel cooling system at any Duke operating facility. Your contention is, of course, concerned only with the spent fuel pool at Catawba, and thus the answer was properly limited. Nevertheless, there was an incident at Oconee in which the boron concentration fell below 2,000 part per million in the reactor coolant system.
This matter was reported in Reportable Occurrence Report 270/80-3, dated June 5, 1980. This Report has been available for inspection and copying since February 15, 1983.
Contention 27 (Follow-up Interrogatory 2) You asked for a reference to the Station Technical Specifications for the radiation monitoring redundance requirements, as well as information regarding the status of the draft Technical Specifications.
I am informed that the draft Technical Specifications are scheduled to be submitted to the NRC on May 1.
The instant requirements will be in Technical Specifications 3.3.3.8 and 3.3.3.9.
(Follow-up Interrogatory 4) The reference you requested is contained in Section I.11 of the Catawba Emergency Plan, not the Crisis Management Plan, as originally stated. The earlier answer was in error.
Contention 44
1 Mr. Robert Guild Page 4 April 13, 1983 As I informed you, one additional document responsive to your requests has been identified.
It is entitled " Surveillance Capsule Results From Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3" and is a paper presented at a conference in October of 1977. You had requested a copy of this document.
In checking my records, I learned that it was not sent,to you last Thursday.
I am therefore enclosing another copy with this letter.
I realize, of course, that there is still pending before the Board the objections which we posed to certain of your Follow-up Interrogatories.
However, leaving that aside, I believe that Applicants, with the single exception noted above (relating to tests and quizzes administered to candidates for reactor operator licenses during Applicants' training program),
have complied fully with all Palmetto Alliance's discovery requests. To summarize briefly, on September 22, 1983, Applicants filed their responses to Palmetto Alliance's Interrogatories on Contentions 8 and 27; documents i
identified in those responses have been available for inspection and copying since October 4, 1982.
On October 19, 1982, Applicants responded to Primetto Alliance's Interrogatories on Contention 16. Documents identified in those responses have been availeble for inspection and copying since November 1, 1982. On December 31, 1982, Applicants responded to Palmetto Alliance's Interrogatories on Contentions 6 and 7; the documents identified in these responses have been available since February 15, 1983.
Following the Board's Order of February 9 on your Motion to Compel, Applicants previded i
further responses on February 28, 1983. The documents identified in those responses were available for inspection and copying at your March 14, 1983, i
visit. Finally, Applicants on March 25 filed responses to your Follow-up Interrogatories. Documents associated with those responses were available for inspection and copying March 30. As noted above, some of those documents were sent to you last Thursday; the identification of all documents is I
attached to this letter.
i Very truly yours I
l Albert V.
, Jr.
AVC/jf cc: All Parties without enclosure l
Attachm:nt 1 DESCRIPTIVE INDEX OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY 9 (BACKGROUND FOR TASK FORCE) 1.
Report by the Task Force on QC inspection at Catawba Nuclear Station submitted December, 1981.
The Addendum, which discussed McGuire and Oconee, and all references to McGuire and Oconee in the Report were deleted.
2.
July 15, 1982, memo from C. N. Alexander to G. W. Grier regardirig the status of non-technical concerns.
3.
March 24, 1982, memo from C. N.
Alexander to W. H.
Owen which transmits the attached Non-Technical Welding Inspector concerns and the management imple. mentation plan for non-technical concerns.
4.
March 15, 1982, ne2r.o from C. N.
Alexander to G. W.
Grier which transnits the attached proposed outline for resolution of non-technical concerns.
5.
Notes and drafts of documents from C. N. Alexander's files.
i 6.
January 22, 1982, inemo from J. E.
Grcgan to management regarding Mr. Lee's January 22,
- 1982, memo to J. R.
Wells concerning QA Employee Recourse Procedure.
7.
W. H. Owen draft speech to Catawba QA and QC Inspectors.
8.
Transcript of speech by W. H. Owen to QA and QC Inspectors.
9.
Duke Power Company Construction Procedure Q-1 which establishes the process for resolving NCI reports.
10.
The following are handwritten notes from QC and QA Inspectors which set forth their specific problems and concerns.
A.
Dean Bentley B.
January 19, 1982 notes of T. A. Gardner regarding NCI Nos. 6259 and 6247.
C.
August 6, and 12, and September 3,1981, notes of William H. Burr concerning Catawba NCI Nos. 12682,12420, and 12454.
D.
Memo from Boyce Coffin E.
C. D. Crisp F.
B. Deaton G.
Harold Eubanks (regarding NCI 7850)
H.
A. S. Gantt I.
V. C. Godfrey (dated 1/20/82)
J.
Larry Jackson K.
Richard Jones L.
January 14, 1982, memo from Kenneth W. Carriker to Bob Morgan initiating the Employee Recourse Procedure.
M.
Ronald Kirkland N.
Notes of John McCoy O.
Notes referring to John Rockholt, author unknown P.
Ransom Sims Q.
Mickey Standridge R.
Lindsay Hovis S.
Beau Ross T.
J. R. Bryant 11.
NCI Nos. 9092 and 12549 with attachments 12.
Summary of Catawba welding inspector concerns.
13.
January 1982, memo from R. A.
Morgan to J. R.
Wells and L. R.
Davidson which transmits R. W. Irby's written concerns.
14.
nesponse by David E.
Whitaker, Assistant Engineer, to R. W.
Irby's request for a resolution of NCI No. 13,165, including a one page memo by W. M. Coggins which ccacurs in the analysis.
15.
Notes of Lewis E. Zwissler af Management Analysis Company. 1
Attcchm:nt 2 6
DESCRIPTIVE INDEX OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES 23 AND 25 (NON-TECHNICAL) 1.
January 14, 1982, memo of meeting between L. R.
Davidson and John Rockholt regarding Mr. Rockholt's request to initiate an Employee Recourse Procedure.
2.
December 8, 1981, memo by Jim Turner regarding a meeting with Pat Starnes to discuss his possible promotion to " Inspector A."
3.
Transcript of an August 2, 1979, interview between Rick Lanier and I arry Davidson regarding the termination of Harry Langley.
Mr. Langley was terminated for involvement in a gambling incident at the Catawba Station.
4.
September 29, 1982, memo from Debbie Ensley to George W. Grier.
The memo transmits the following documents which relate to Mr. Michael Rick's Employee Recourse Procedure.
A.
September 22, 1982, memo from L. R.
Davidson to M. K.
Rink B.
September 9,1982, memo from J. W. Willis to M. K. Rink C.
September 1,1982, memo from C. R. Baldwin to M. K. Rink i
D.
An undated list of personal concerns and crew concerns by M. K.
Rink 5.
August 27, 1982, letter from Michael Rink to L. R.
Davison with an August 18, 1982, letter attached. Mr. Rink's letter requests a promotion and explains some of his dissatisfactions.
l 6.
January 22, 1982, memo from W. S.
Lee to J. R.
Wells regarding i
reclassification of welding inspectors.
The memo provides Mr. Lee's decision on the Employee Recourse Procedure initiated by welding and maintenance inspectors at Oconee, McGuire and Catawba.
l 7.
January 14, 1982, letter from John R.
McCoy to Bob Morgan which I
initiates an F,mployee Recourse Procedure based on his perceived lack of support for Q. A. inspectors..
t
8.
January 14,
- 1982, memo from Kenneth W.
- Karriker, Q.C.
Welding Inspector, to Bob Morgan initiating an Employee Recourse Procedure based on his perceived lack of support for the Q.C. program.
9.
March 9, 1982, letter from John Rockholt to G. W.
Grier initiating an Employee Recourse Procedure based on the promotion of another employee to a position he was interested in.
10.
July 31, 1981, memo from G. E.
- Ross, Q.C.
Supervisor, to W. H.
Bradley proposing revisions to the position analysis for Q. A. Welding Inspector A, proposing an upgrade to Grade 11.
11.
June 2,1982, handwritten memo from Beau Ross to Art Allum requesting a
copy of Federal Regulations and Duke Power Company policy concerning harrassment or intimidation of inspection personnel.
12.
Copies of the calendar of Beau Ross for January, April, June, August and December,1982.
13.
Documents obtained fr om the file of Susan Broom.
They include memoranda reflecting varinus conferences, primarily disciplinary or perform::nce related, with the following persons:
A.
David H. Boney B.
B. Judd Crowe C.
Michelle Ramseur D.
Teresa Hudspeth E.
Jane Pressley 14.
Notes beginning on 12/16/82 involving conferences between Ray Pettit and Larry Martin regarding resolution of quality control issues.
(These notes are handwritten and are partially illegible.)
15.
Documents obtained from the files of J. C. Shropshire.
They include the following:
A.
Documents regarding Timothy E.
Hawkins' request for medical coverage for one of his chudren B.
Notes regarding conferences with C. L.
Biggers concerning l
promodon.
l '
l
16.
Documents obtained from the files of Jim Turner. The documents pertain to conferences with the following persons in;rolving either personnel matters or resolution of Q.C. issues:
A.
P. D. Starnes B.
Tommy Barron C.
K. M. Wiles D.
D. R. Silvers E.
Mark Coren F.
J. F. Kelly G.
C. Bearden 17.
Documents obtained from the files of Tommy Barron.
The documents pertain to conferences with the following persons which were either personnel related or involved resolution of Q.C. issues:
A.
Janet Mills B.
Pat Starnes C.
Larry Carlisle 18.
Documents obtained from the files of Debbie Ensley. The documents are either personnel
- related, and involve disciplinary or personnel conferences, or involve resolution of Q.C. issues:
A.
Anthony Lowery J.
Nancy J. Spence B.
John Rockholt K.
R. W. Mack C.
Janet P. Mills L.
P. M. Reep D.
Kenneth Karriker M.
Teresa Hudspeth E.
John Rockholt N.
Tim Daniels l
F.
Barry Alderman O.
Bobby Cobb l
G.
J. R. Bryant P.
Jackie Huskey l
H.
Chris Dewey Q.
Don Barkley l
I.
Thomas M. Barnes R.
M. K. Rink t
{
l i
bMdEB23iTdD6 DESCRIPTIVE INDEX OF DdCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES 23 AND 25 (TECHNICAL)
I.
Documents obtained from Beau Ross in response a request for all documents containing disagreements or resolution of Q.C. issues:
1.
January 20, 1982, handwritten memorandum from V. C.
Godfrey.
2.
An October 17, 1980, handwritten note with the initials CRB (Charles Baldwin) with a nuclear safety related sketch attached.
3.
January 13, 1982, letter from John M. Rockholt to W. H. Bradley.
4.
January 14, 1982, letter from V. C.
Godfrey, Jr. to Bob Morgan which initiates the Emplcyee Recourse Procedure.
5.
January 19, 1982, memo from J. E. Henson to Bob Morgan which initiates the employee recourse procedure.
6.
February 9,
- 1981, Catawba Nonconforming Item Report #10979.
7.
An August 9,1982, handwritten memoranda concerning Catawba NCI
- 13781 by John Bryant.
8.
June 19, 1981, memo from R. A.
Morgan to the Catawba file in reference to implementation of Q. A.
Procedure M-4, revision 9.
The memo sets forth guidelines to be followed in implementing the referenced Q. A. Procedure and Form M-4A, revision 17.
9.
Copies of Beau Ross' calendar notations from May, 1980 through February,1982, relating to Q.C. meetings and discussions.
II.
Detail process control sheets relating to the following welds:
'1.
ORN 55-3 2.
ORN 56-3 3.
ORN 57-3 4.
ORN 58-3
III.
Docments obtained from a file maintained by John Bryant (1-11).
The documents pertain to resolution of Q.C. issues and personnel matters:
1.
Two January 9,
- 1982, handwritten documents labelled Catawba Nuclear Station Lack of Support for Q.C. Inspectors and for the Q.A.
Program, which detail general and specific instances of perceived lack of support for the Q.C. inspectors and the Q. A.
program.
2.
January 21, 1982, memo from J. R. Wells to all Catawba Welding Inspectors regarding the quality control program at Catawba.
3.
November 3, 1982, memo from John R. Bryant to Tom McCracken, Manager Personnel Administration.
The memo complains about the wage increase given to welding inspectors as compared to the general increase for the Company.
4.
Undated handwritten memo from John R. Bryant to Mr. McCracken which is a draft of No. 3 above.
5.
Handwritten notes of quality control issue in the process of being resolved.
6.
Duke Power Company Form Q. A.-1A dated
, referring to Serial No.13028, consisting of 2 pages.
7.
November 19, 1981, letter from Gail Addis, Director Employer Relations, to John R. Bryant responding to his November 3 letter concerning the pay grade for welding inspectors.
8.
Handwritten memo dated July 19, 1982, from John R. Bryant to Bob Morgan relating to NCI No. 14,816 setting forth Mr. Bryant's position regarding the Q.C. disagreement..
9.
July 28,1982, memo from R. A. Morgan, Project Q. A. Engineer, to J. R. Bryant, responding to the July 19, 1982, memo from Bryant
)
to Morgan.
10.
August 3, 1982, memo from John R.
Bryant to Larry Davidson i
which initiates a Q.C. recourse regarding NCI No.14,816.
11.
August 12, 1982, letter form L. R. Davidson, Q.A. Manager, to l
J. R. Bryant responding to the August 3,1982 memo.
12.
August 11, 1982, notes labelled Calibration Problems with the initials EAC (E. A. Cole)
Documents obtained from files of Larry R. Davidson (13-22):
13.
July 12, 1979, memo to file from L, R.
Davidson regarding exit interview of Ron McAfee.
14.
Response by David E.
Whitaker, Assistant Engineer, to R. W.
Irby's request for a resolution of NCI No.13,165, including a one page memo by W. M. Coggins which concurs in the analysis.
- 15. March 7,1980, exit interview form for the exit interview of
~
Mtryin D. Johnson, interviewed by Joe C. Shropshire.
- 16. March 18, 1982, memo by Joe C. Shropshire to file regarding exit interview of Marvin D Johnson.
17.
September 24, 1981, exit interview of T. O. Brown, interviewed by R. A. Morgan.
- 18. October 5, 1981, handwritten notes by J. C. Shropshire regarding Weld No. IFW10-13.
The notes indicate that the weld was inspected and is acceptable.
19.
September 29, 1981, memo to Bob Morgan from CRB (Charles Baldwin) regarding Weld FW10-13.
The memo relates to a dispua over whether the weld was done properly.,
20.
December 10, 1981, memo from Patricia S. Childers, Q. A. Employee Relations, and Faye II.
Fowler, Supervisor Employee Relations, regarding investigation of a harrassment complaint involving an incident between Q.A.
Inspector Larry Jackson and Construction Foreman Ed McKenzie.
The memo concludes that there was no harrassment based on a review of the incident.
21.
Handwritten notes of L. R.
Davidson dated 12/14/81 regarding meeting with Baldwin, Ross, Ledford, Deaton, Morgan, and Jackson relating to allegations of harrassment.
- 22. January 11, 1981 notes and comments by Larry Davison from a i
meeting held with Inspectors, including a list of the names of the inspectors who attended the meeting.
23.
January 21, 1982, letter from J. R. Wells to Kenneth W. Carriker regarding Mr. Carriker's letter to Bob Morgan of January 14, 1982.
Mr. Wells responds to Mr. Morgan's concerns about perceived lack of support by the Company.
24.
January 14, 1982, letter from P. C. Godfrey to Bob Morgan which initiates an Employee Recourse Procedure.
- 25. Memo from Kenneth W.
Carriker dated January 14, 1982, to Bob Morgan which initiates an Employee Recourse Procedure..
Att: chm:nt 4 February 23, 1982
~
MEMO TO FILE R3:
Contents of File On Inspector Recourse and Technical Concerns N1)
Procedure for changing Quality Assurance Department Non-Exempt Positions.
This procedure was implemented on July 6,1981 and resulted in partial general increase for some inspectors.
s.-
2)'
N y
'4) Hemo documenting QA recourse discussion meeting of November 19, 1981.
"v This memo summarizes the concerns presented in 34, step 2, recourses received f romM, Catawba M. This memo contains seven suggestions to answer the concerns brought up in step 2 recourse.
5)
Letter f rom Gail Addi s f rom Warren Nen, dated December 3,1981.
This letter documents a number of concerns brought up by QA inspectors g
at Catawba M concerning work quality and relationships with Construction and Steam.
I 6)
Letter f rom W S Lee to W H Nen, dated-December 4,1981. This letter l
directs Warren Nen to appoint a Task Force of Individuals to look into the concerns documented in Gail Addis' letter of December 3,1981.
- 7) Memorandum by W H Nen, dated December 10, 1981. This is an excellent l
summary of the history of the quality Assurance Department, from 1974 I
until the present.
It documents the transfer of QC f rom the Construction Department to the Quality Assurance Department in February 1981, and the rational behind the qualifications required for welding inspectors. The decision to reduce the Welding inspector grade by one level is discussed along with the communications / steps taken by QA management to implement this decrease and grade.
The second part of this memorandum documents the instructions concerning the task force appointed as a result of W S Lee's letter of December 4, 1981.
i l
l lv<
p Z/23/82 MEMO TO FILE Pcge 2 1
8)
Letter from W H Owen to Task Force Members, dated December 10, 1981.
This letter serves the purpose of appointing the Task Force Members.
'% 9)
Hemo to File by J R Wells, dated December 11, 1981. This memorandum sunnarizes the concerns expressed by inspectors at Catawba at meetings held by J R Wells on November 23 & 24, 1981. These concerns are generally non-technical in nature.
10)
Letter from J E Grogan to R L Dick, dated December 16, 1981, summarizing actions taken at Catawba to improve QA relations.
I 11)
Hand written memo dated January 18, 1982 documenting a plan by L R Davison
,,that would clear up inspector concerns at Catawba.
12)
Hand written memo dated January 19, 1982 by W H Owen documenting a meeting held with J R Wells, L R Davison and J 0 Barbour.
This memo documents the fact that Larry Davison had asked welding inspectors to list all con-cerns contained in their black books for review and confirmation of resolutions. This memo also documents the formation of a team to review these concerns expressed by the welding inspectors.
- 13) Hand written memo dated December 28, 1981 by Larry Davison containing a proposed plan of action to answer we,1 ding inspector concerns at Catawba.
i This is in response to the Task Force formed as a result of the letter of W S Lee dated December 4, 1981.
J
- 14) Task Force Report dated December 29, 1981, to W H Owen. This report covers only the investigation of the concerns at Catawba.
It contains seven recommendations arrived at as a result of interviews with in-spectors and supervisors at Catawba.
15 )
Letter from W H Owen to R L Dick and J R Wells, dated January 6,1982.
i This letter sets up a meeting to discuss the Task Force Report of concerns investigated at Catawba.
16)
Letter from J R Wells to W H Owen, dated December 12, 1981.
Apparently the date should be January 12, 1982. This documents actions recommended to the undertaken at Catawba and contains essentially the same information as the memo written by Larry Davison, dated December 28, 1981.
N 17)
~
~
18)
Package of Recourse letters from Welding inspectors at Catawba. This package contains six recourse letters which basically address non-technical and technical concerns, not associated directly with the recourse or.
the pay situation.
~
~
w gw
- - ' ---m-w---
\\.
2/23/82 MEMO TO FILE P;ge 3 19)
Letter from J R Wells to ALL Catawba Welding Inspectors, dated January 21, 1982.
This letter is intended to be a answer to the recourse letter package and informs the inspectors that their concerns will be investigated by a team of individuals from QA, Design and Construction.
And that the resolution of these items will be communicated to the inspectors.
V 20)
Letter from W S Lee to J R Wells, dated January 22, 1982, which documents the results of the third step of recourse exercised by Building and Maintenance inspectors at' Catawba. This letter is the final action on the recourse concerning the reduction and the Welding jnspector's pay grade by one step.
21)
Copy of talk given to Welding inspectors at Catawba by W H Owen on Jcnuary 27, 1982.
22)
Hand written proposal dated January 27, 1982, outlining a training session to be given to QA inspectors to increase their knowledge of and confidence in the resolution of non-conforming items.
23)
Letter from Management Analysis Company to Warren Owen, dated January 27, 1982. This letter is a proposal to provide assistance to Duke Power Company in evaluating the technical concerns raised by several QA in-spectors at Catawba.
24)
Hand written summarization of specific technical and non-technical concerns raised by welding inspectors at Catawba.
I 25)
Letter from Parks Cobb to W H Daen, dated February 3,1982, outlining l
the Task Force Plan to investigate Catawba Welding Inspector concerns.
26)
Letter from Parks Cobb to Warren (Men, dated February 12, 1982, finalizing the plan to be used by the Task Force in investigating welding inspector concerns.
27)
Reports made by Danny Powell on January 28, 1982, February 3, 1982, February 4,1982 and February 5,1982 concerning relationships between the Welding Inspectors and Construction Craf t at Catawba, as well as other information concerning the welding inspector situation.
28)
Letter from G W Grier to R W t rby, dated February 19, 1982, answering Irby's technical recourse letter of January 11, 1982.
>c
,../
2/23/82 MEMO TO FILE P ge 4 29)
Undated memo by W H Owen documenting the status of safety allegations by some QA inspectors at Catawba. This memo documents steps taken between the time Gail Addis wrote her letter to W H Owen on December 3,1981 and the appointment team to review technical concerns, including the decision to anploy an outside consultant from Management Analysis Corporation on January 22, 1982.
30) 31 ) s A chronology written by V H Owen giving history of wage action in quality Assurance and Construction between January 1979 and July 1981 and subsequence recourse steps started on July 17, 1981 through January 12, 1982.
32)
Listing of Wage Action for inspectors and welders from July 25, 1977 through July 6, 1981.
33)
Letter from G W Grier to J C Rogers and L R Davison informing them that the investigation findings, concerning R W trby's concerns, showed that the action of blowing construction air into the pipe had no detrimental effect on the quality of the weld.
'* 34)
'~ 35) l
'v 36) l N 37) 38)
Chronology by G W Grier f rom January 27, 1982 - February 22, 1982.
l l
L l
.