ML20073B998

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- December 1990

ML20073B998
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/31/1991
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I02, NUREG-0750-V32-I02, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I2, NUREG-750-V32-I2, NUDOCS 9104250060
Download: ML20073B998 (75)

Text

- - - _ _ _ _ -__.

l l

NUREG-0750 Vol. 32 Index 2 INDEXES:TO

! NUCLEAR. REGULATORY iCOMMISSION ISSUANCES i.

L

'Juy:- December 990 t

i-

,e

,., -4 t

h,L y~v ** y y

+

j.

"Q E

>g o

x, V

), ', J

T, Lg

+

T 3.

t, s

w

(

p' -

IL 4;j.,

,1

• M i'

g.:;

lt

j i

U.S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

!$2"n8ng 92m31 0750 R PDR

Availablo from Superintontendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Offico Post Offico Box 37082 Washington, D.C. 20013-7082 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication.

Singlo copies of this publication are available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield. VA 22161

i 4

t l

Errors in thla publication rNiy be reported to the Division of Freedom of information and Publications Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 l

(301/492-8925)

Tv w s

-,ee-w r

r-e----+-

,-w..tw.--ee

---

.re-

+

<-,iy,w-3

+.m w a. i w -.

-,me,-v--e-r,-,3--a, e

+y-a-%vu e'e--,rn v,,wv.--w-v-smy-em e,.irwg,-

l 1

NUREG-0750 Vol. 32 Index 2 N DEXES TO NUC'_ EAR 9EGU_ATORY COM V SS'ON SSUANCES July - December 1990 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Prepared by the Division of Froodom of Information and Publications Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Rogulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 (301/492-8925) t 1

Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances v.he Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), *be Atomic Safety and Licensing floard Panel (LDP), the Administrative Law Judge ( AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document.

These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Cast iuune (owner (s) of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance numter issues raised by appellants Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number Subjeci matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating Ilcense, etc.)

Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

1 Case Name Index The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances F.ach case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

j

2. Digests and lleaders The headers and digests are presented in is:;uance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAU),

the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LUP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Dentals of Petitions for Rulemaking.

The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

til i

i 3.1.egal Citations Index This index is divided into four jurts and consists of alphabetical or alphanu-merical ammgements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. 'these citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name anNor applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

'the references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally fol-lowed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance.

These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4, Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and

- subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phruses are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. l'acility Index The index consists of an alphabetical arrangernent of facility rmmes frorn the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of i

issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

i 9

i i

l o

IV

1 1

i i

l I

i CASI: N AMI: INill'.X l

\\

l ALL Citi:h0 CAL 15010PL 1WillCllMENT, INC.

CONTTRUCDON Pl.RMIT MODlDCAllON AND MIOW CAU$1, MI MORANDUM AND ORDLR i

(Ruluss em NRC Staff Num f<r Sununary thspmthm and thamusal af Pam<tmg), twet Nm I

$0MU, 54Mhl (AtlJIP Na 89 5960ioMSC (Camstrmwn Pwnst Nos. CPLP 1 and Cl1.P.2).

12PM26,32 NRC 30 (IMO)

ARIZONA PUlilJC EERVICL CUMPANY, a at j

R14UEST IOR ACDON, PARTIAL DlkECTOR'S Dic$lON UNDIA 10 Cell $ 2.2(6, [wa Nos $0 528,54329,50530t DI1947,32 NRC 273 (199(r) i (Tf!/ ens TASK ICRCE OF CllAM;L 1[Ilh et al.

I DEN 1AL Ol' PtTT!10N IOR RUll:MAKINO, Iham N<e PRM 3031. PRM 5445, PRM 3046, i

DPRM 941, $2 NRC 2810990)

CLIVI:tAND F.LJ;CTRIC llLUMINA11NO COMPANY, a et i

OPLRATINO (JCIW$li AMTRDMENf; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (thytng 1 aff's and

/

tacennee's huse for kemnsklerstke), twin No $0 4400tA.2 (AtthP Na 90 &6 02OIA),

W

!JIP4425,32 NRC 210990)

..f.-----..-

OPL RATtNO IJCENSE AMENDMINT4 !NfilAL Dir!$10N (Apptwing ikenas Amendment), Ihdet No. 544400lA 2 (ASISP No. 94605 02-OLA), LSP-9S39,32 NRC 368 (19w) a RI:QUtsT IOR ACTION, DIRIX'f0R'$ DICISION UNDLR 10 C 0 k 6 2.2te, [haet Na $0440, DD94fg 32 Nic 195 0990)

COMMON %TAL111 I;D150N COMPANY

/

LNIORCEMIN!; MiliORANDUM AND ORDER (Arprwing settlanwre Agamme and Terminating Puedngs); thdet Nea 542544M, SS265 OM (A$1BP No. 90&n02 OM) (IA 94032)

Oscibly Ormling Ikonee Nta Df%29 end DPR40) LSP428,32 NRC 85 0990) y a

COMMON %TALTil LDISON COMPANY, et al CONSTRUCDON IT.RMrr %7111DRAWA14 ORDER APPROVINO %TDIDRAWAL AND T!1MINATINO PROCLEDINO, thdas Nos $0599.L$R 54600I;5R (ASI.itP No. 79 422 01 E5),

laPM37,32 NRC 270 0990)

CURATORS OF ll!E UNIVERSTTY OF MISSOURI MATERIA 131JCI'NSE AMENDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Onicrveuws' Mothm for i

lhrected Castifustian). Dides N<s. 1000270,3402275-M1A (ASfJIP Na 90 613 02-MIA)

(fkUMP-3 Projed) Olypoduct IJcense No. 24 00513 32, $pecial Nuclear Mauirials Laense Na

$NM 247); 12P402J,32 NRC 7 0990)

MATLRIA13 IJCIWSE AMTEDhuNT; Mt.MORANDUM AND ORDIR (Canplateness el the llearing IW); Dodet Nos. 7000270, 3402275-M1A (A51bP Na 90613 02 M1A) (TRUMP 3 ~

Pmject) (Bypoduct Lkenis Na 24-00513 32; Special Nwlear Materials IJcense Na SNM 247),

ISPW27,32 NRC 40 (1990)

MA11RIA1A IJCI'NSE AMfRDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Tempursry Stay Rapest),

^

Dides N 3. 7400270, 30022784RA (ASLJIP No. 94613-02-M1A) (R4: TRUMP 1 Project)

Olypenduct licones Na 24 00513 32, Special Nuclear Maianals tkmse Na SNM 247); LSP 9430, 32 NRC 95 0890)

MATT.RIA!J IJCINSE AMlWDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Intervinors' Reiewed Motum for Completian of floaring Irle and Related Mauerr)- thdet Nos. 7000270,3002278 MLA t

(ASIJIP ha. 9061102-M1A) (RIi: TRUMP S Project) Olypudud Ikonae Na 24 00H3 32, 5pecial Nuclear Maianals (kerne No. $NM 247), ISPW33,32 NRC 245 (1990) 1 l

i i

CANI NAMI: IN!Il3 t

MATLRIA!J (JCIN$L AMlWDMINii Mt.hk*ANDUM AND ORDI.R (Mesi for Onler Cee a. mag thawnenu), Thdes No MtU170,30 036 MLA (AsthP Nn M613 02 M1A) (RI.:

TRUMP-s Npet) Olypn. duct IJ.ense Na 24A51132, 5;=ial Nances Matarials (Acense Nn

$NM 247y, ISP M34,22 NirC 233 (IVW) htA11.RIA13 tJCIWSF. Ah0WDMINT4 MI ht*ANilUM AND ORL)lJt (Orart d Tanipurary &ut),

thdet No 700fm0, Strmt h0A (AllSP No M613 02-M1A)(RL: TRtfMP 5 Pn9en)

(Bypn= hut (Acies Na 24fE611-32. Spaial Natear Mstenals thenne No $NM 247), IJtP 9433, 12 NRC 259 (1990)

MA1T.ktAlJ IJClW51 Ah0SDMINT4 Mi MORANDUM AND ORDijl (tkasee's Parbal Res;=wwe Caruernma 'fesy<rery Stas), Ikdet N,e, Mtum0, 402278 MLA (A1LitP Na 94613MMI A)

(RL: 11tUMP 5 Njon) Olyrmdws tumes Na 24 01613 32, $pecsal Nudest Mstenals tacense No. $NM N7), ISP 9438,32 NRC 359 0990)

. MATillALA IJCIN$0 AMtNDMINT; Mt.MORANDUM AND ORDlJt (thmentuunn of $isy), thde Nos 7400270, M02278 MIA (AstJIP Na 94613 02= h0A) (RL: TRUMP 8 Prtyrct) Olyprodwt IAmnac Na 240l613 32, Spanal Nwlear Maianals (Joense Na ENM N7), tJIP Mel,32 NRC 380 0 490)

MATT 11AlJ LJC1W3L AMlWDMINT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDt.R (Pundmg Mcaians, taludmg Nl u); thdas Nos 740I1270, M02278 M1A LA$1JIP Na P

These Ralstad to Punnesaksi d 90 61340 MtA) (RL: TitOMP.8 Prosen) Olyprodut IJcense No, N 0051312, Special Nuclear Maianals (Jnroe Na SNM N7); tJIP M45,32 NRC 449 (1990) 11DRIDA K1Wil AND LJulff COMPANY Ol1*ATING LJCIW50 AMlWDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND OkDLR (Mauan to IAsman);

thdoi Nu. $42$401A $,50 2514)lA $ (A51JIP Na 94602 014)lA.$) Godmksi Speafatime L saw.6,w4) (l'idliiy (h.w.ung LJ.w e N,s. DPROt DFli41). LST.MN,12 NkC U Oyw; i

Ol11ATING tJCLN5E AMLNDMINT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDi* (Cmaidersum af Ibaarole sus $parue issuesk thdei Nis, $42MOlA-3, $425l.0LA $ (ASISP Na 94602414)l A.5)

Dechnical Specifmeties Rei acement) (leeilny Operstang IJeams Na DPR 31, DPR41);

d ISP 9432. 32 NRC lli (1990)

OLORULA POWLR COMPANY, se al Ol1: RATING LJCrWsE AMINDMINil MIMORANDUM AND ORDTR Ornarvesunn Paium).

thda Ns. 544240lA,5442%OLA (A51JtP Na M617MOtA) Oscilny Oprating Ikonses NPF48 and NIT tt); ISP 9429,32 NRC 89 0990)

(IWJ 151AND LJOlfftNO COMPANY OPIAATING tJCIW50 AMENDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDil [hdas No. 54322, C1J to 8,32 NRC 201 (19M)

RIX)UtsT K)R AcI10N, DIRMWR'$ Difl5KN UNDIR 10 Cf,R. 62.2% (Ada Na 54322, t

DD 948, 32 NRC 469 (19W)

MARVIN LJ!WIS DLNLAL OF I1*ITt10N M)R RULLMAKING thdoi Na PRM S432, !)PRM M3,32 NRC 326 (1990)

Pull!JC ALRVICE COMPANY OF NEW ltAMPS111RL, a et OI13A11NO (JCIW$11; Dil'ISK)N Iham Naa. 54443 OL, 54444 OL (O(!siis Emerseruy 1%nnmg lasues); AIAB 934,32 NRC 1 (1990); A1AB 9)3,32 NRC 5109W); AIAll 9%. 32 NRC 75 0990); AIAll 937,32 NRC 135 0990); AIAll 941,32 NRC 337 (1990); ALAll 942,32 NRC 393 UNO)

OPIAA11NO LJCIWSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER kEGARDING RLil.ItRED QUESTION 3; thdas N<s. 504434)lo $444401 (Offsite I'mergmcy Ptarains lasurel ALAB 939,32 NRC 16$

0 990)

OITRATING LJCI'NSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR, !)da Nis, 5444Milet,50 444014 (Isw.fwer 'Issungl; AIAB 940,32 NRC 225 (1990)

O(11ATING IJCLNSE; ORDLR; thdet Nos. 50443 A $44444)l. (Offsite Imergency 1%nning).

Ctj 9410,32 NitC 218 0990) 2 l'

l l

l l

f l

~... _ _ _ - - _ _ _

l CASI' N AMI' INDEX OliaATINO IJCIW51' Rt. MAND, MI MOIMNDUM AND ORDI R (theyes LAweer's Mutasi fur Senmary thepsiuum of lasass Romanded in ALAB 937), them Nia M443OLA 3, b444 013 3 M$1&P No. 90619 (04113 3) (offsas lanergen Mammst thPM40,32 NRC 376 (19H1)

OPtAATINO IJCIW11: Kl. MAND, Mi MORANDUM AND ORDI.R (henmary thapultem hamk

!kdm Nis. SO44340R, S44440R (AstSP Na 902014L-k) (Isnergan hanrung. AlJ Paumus), LJIPW44,32 NkC 43.3 (19W)

Rl4UtJT LOR AC110N, DIRIA*!DR'S DICISION UNDlJ 10 CLR. l1386, thda Na 30443, DDM4,32 NRC 43 (1990), DD 90 3,32 NRC 109 (19W) kulit.KT l. DICKlil:RHl3 IA10kCEMINT; Mt.MORANDUM AND ORDl1 (Ars-tweg $wtiemers Agreement and Termmsung Pimendmge), IAda No. 33 SO $C (AstSP Na 90610015C) (IA M031) (Sanor Operatur Lkenee IJmind to Puni llandhes, No. SOP 23618k ISP-9028,32 NRC 63 (1900) 811RRA CLUB DIWlAL Ol' 111TT10N IOR RUIJ MAKINO, Ihdet Na l'RM 4023, DPRM B2,32 NRC 317 (1990)

ST, MRY MEDICAL CINT1R-ilOHART and ST. MAkY MEDICAL, CINrLR-CARY MOD 111 CAT 10N OF IJCt.N5th MlWRANDUM AND ORDER (Mmm to $trike Cawn Dommentsk thda Nte. (0031379 OM, (D00161LOM (ASISP Na 5612 040M) (IA Na 90071) (Order $uspendmg Br 4ythmery Anivities and ModJyvig tairwek ISP.9036,32 NRC 267 (1990)

MOD!!1 CAT 10N OF (JCIW50; MfM*ANDUM AND ORDEA (Order An.riwing Battlerners Agreemmt); Ikda Nos. (D031379-OM,03001613 OM (AttSP No. 90612 04 OM) (IA Na 90071) (Order suspendmg Brs4ytherapy Acevtues and Mefymg laamek ISP 9446,32 NRC 463 (1990) 81 Alt OF ((1JNOll SIC 110N 274 AGR17. MINT; MEWAANDUM AND ORDIR, thdet Na PR Mi MISC (Amendment No. I to nortion 274 Agrerenant Beween NRC smi Illmalsk ClJ 949,32 NRC 210 (199 0

$1l'IlON 274 AORE!: MINT; MIM*ANDUM AND ORDIR; [hdu Na PR Bl M150 (Amendmet No.1 In Secuari 274 Agreement Bmeeen NRC sad Ilhnmsk Clj 94it. 32 NRC 333 (1990)

'!UtJA OAMMA RAY, INC, IW10RCIMNT AC110N; MLMCRANDUM AND ORD12 (Manunnahrms Prehearms Confonrwe),

thda Na 30123tt-OvP M$tJIP Na 90618@CvP) (Mater, ale LJcense Na 3317176 01) (IA 49 223% IDPW43,32 NRC 390 (1990)

IW180RCEMEl# ACIlON; PRtillARINO CONITALNCE MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR; thdet No. M12319CvP (A5LBP No. 946tl4LOvP) (Maiorials Ikonse Nu Skl117841) (LA 89 223),

IAPW42,32 NRC 387 (1990)

LNIORCEMElG; NOTICI' OF IIEARINO AND 011tER MATTLR$; thda Na M12319CvP (AltaP Na 94618 03-OvP) (EA 84223) (Mnenal 13eerme No. 3Fl?!?leik ISP 9031,32 NRC 107 (1990)

VERMONT YANKEE NUC11AR POWER C(*PORATION OPLRATINO IJCI'.NSE AMINDMINT; MI;MORANDUM AND ORDI.R; thdas Na 2271.OIA (Spas lbst Pud Amewimat), C1190-7,32 NRC 129 (1990)

Oli kATINO IJGN5ti AMENDMINT; NG!1CP4 thdas Na 34271 OLA (Spas lbst Pal Amendmet); A1Al1938,32 NRC 154 (1990) 3 i

m_m

DIGINIS IUUANCI.$ OF Tlli: hl1CilAR kl.Gl'LATORY C041%IlulON Cl.J M7 VI.RMONT YANKII NUCILAR IUWl,R (URK)RA110N (Vennws Yedes Nalear Iwer Suunn), thsdat Nn 50 271 Ot.A (Sport luel Piud Anedment), OM RA11NO LJM.N5L AMlWDMlWr; Sepambe 21,1990, int;MORANDUM AND ORDt.R A

%e Omnmissmn dismisees th6s prmoedma em Ow wirqvued motum d on IJcensee Nmedeness, Gw Canmuasicet feels diat censin mauers raised by on Imerymrea On ljanese, and the Appeal Itoani warrent a reepsies and, therefus, uses the occasma to tanenent an Omme manors. De Cienmissim slan rmies pian by <<s fming de Imerywuns' case to the torsenthm that they thanaalves drafted and fded,6i acted in sm4sd m% alnuet 20 yeam of Canmissum Amspudence.

It he Cunumstuet's ymim in ClJ 944,31 NRC 333 (1990), made clear that low pot Whty is uw key to applytrig NI;PA's rule of reas e test to centenuma that alnese Oisi a spedfic arctders scenene pensena a signincant envinwvnenal impset est nasi tw avaluated.

C he Cte.uninsum's opnhe in Clj 944,31 NRC 333 (19W), nwde alter dai in the future, when avlymg Ow nde of ressan* test assinst shidi envmairnanal can,antuve ers to be jmised wulse N1.PA, a Imding utet sa kvadent scenario is samme and spemlauve nuut be more specific sad mmo suuruty tweed m the actual pedobihnes and seddas scenanas being analyred than they won in thu case ClJ948 IDNQ IS1AND (JUlf!1NO COMPANY (5harsham Nuclear h=st Statkm, Unii l), lhdet No.

$4 321, OPl.RA11NO ljCIW11'. AMlWDMINTi (kscher 17,1990 Ml;MORANDUM AND ORDlJt A

he Cerrimistian tansiders e mundier of peuuans seeking various remedwe necerning de Shm, ham Plant. On one espect d on reint sought, the Convninske determmes dist the NeumalImvinamental hihry Act (NIJ'A) and 04 Ausnic Imergy Act (Al A) of 1954, as emmuted, du run ruptive the NRC, in Gua case, to summider

• resumed eversunn* as an ahernauve to decanunissietmg he Cwurussum forwanis em peutums to the Auwnic Safesy and licensus Itoani for resolutum of all other aspects af Go requesta.

It Undur NRC regulatima, the Canmisnan nest oppnw d a bconwee's dmunmissuming plan, including considersuun of alternanve ways whsteby denunrmanusurig may be savenphahed,10 CER.

( $0.82; last nowhere in NRC's regulatanns La la essaanplated that Ow Commissum wmld sued to alvstrwe of a twensee's dectske that e plam ahnuld not be warated.

C I;acept in lughly wmacal circumstances, sah sa dune outlund in secuans 108, ll6(ck ami Ill of Ow Ainma linergy Act, the NRC lada auttuw6ty to direct a heennes to warne a luermed facibty D

he decinan an a method fm decarmnusimeg e fac1hty - M grused to Ow dechian whether to damnarassum o facihty s e derisum that rupnne NRC renew sad approval.

F.

he shernanvo of *wsumed operstkut* - er other maoumis of genersung electncity - are alternatives to Os decismn not to operate e plant and Gum are beyond Commmamn omsidentaan 1

In armdering a pnyased denstmuasiming plan, de NRC need only consider ehernatives to the method of demannusauwung Otat de plan pqxues.

O In considering shenet;tes uruler the Nabanal Imvimnmental Policy Act ("N1;PA"), the Comnuasum need nm censider dune thernatives euuide ths "sule d seasm." NRDC v. Callowsy,124 F.2d 79,92 (2d Ctr.1973).

11

Resumed operauon" of a nuclear facihty Diat wemld ratture "significers change in goversnenial pahey or legislauan," or the *merhaul d basic Irgslaum " la an thernauve outside the utgw of what du

• mle of sessan* requuss an agency te consides as a paa of as 1:15. See NR!X' v. Callaeay, $24 F.2d 79 Qd Cu.1973L and NR'JC v. Mininn 438 F.2d 327 (D C. Cir.1972)

i l

l i

DIGl3TS 6.4504M13 OF 'Illt NUCLIAR klGUI,ATORY COMtf MION i

CU 909 STATT, DF llMNOll,IMet Na PR 9M MISC (Amadment Na l to Naim M4 Agneansas i

bem f4RC and litumash $lfrioN 27d AGRl1MlXft Ocwher 17,19M MlatORANI4'M AND OkDLR A

N Cepeninsum dwuss Kert M.Ose's niouan fut a full edpecatory hrering m tilumas' papeed standards far en segulatum 4if sectum llem dypoduct maienal pnas to ammdrnent of 94 NRC/llhnma agreemeni to allow die $iais to assume regulausy authunty eve that matenal N Cantmasum betwves that, leftee turmng nyer that suiharity to !!hrans, it is seqmad caly to asamis the general sundants put forwerd l'y De State wuhnut an adpecatory appbcauan of Guns sundards to the specific cies involved.

Ilowever, tlw Comminamn 41eo holds that if the $tais seeks to ed@t alterneuves to ComrnisaWe requirwaaras for desemal d the materials et the West Chaego site, de Canmaanan wdl duermins, after notic4 and ertartunhy fw s hearing, whether the Staw's therretrves will achiew e Iml d panecnan to safWy and the envinsenas equivalers to or snars stringers sham the level ubeved by Canmusim stamlards.

D

'Ibe hasnrg mpiromams of the last paragtsges af ascoon 2740 af the Act are triggwed lash when a mais brings fewwerd psqwed gmeral ahernatives to Cssnmissum tequirwenu fw De segulatism of sw*um llem bypnukus mawrial, and wiwa e stee brings fwwerd sitespedAc skernauves to such Commission seguirsenarna.

C Nees and cunnues pactures are suflicient for the purpse of assessing a mais's gererst alwrnauves to Camnussian requiremerus fw to aguistion d satum lle(2) bypatuct enatorial, and Omme pmodures seusly satum 274o's heanns requiserners with neerd to 04 NRC's spront of de staw's general standards and program, f ee Siegel v Alc,400 F.2d 778 (D.C. CV 1%s)

D he Orwnnessum believes that k is required ady to ends s quasblogislatin judgment under section Ddo on whether the generic mandards within a stats's pogram will,in gemoral and withnut sofeemn to '

s perucular aise er beennes, lead to a level of stabihrsunn and enntainment of the eles eencerned sa.1 e level of powetlan for goblis hashh and Ow envueenes, qinvales to, to dw essent par %atde, or innes j

stringen own the level that would be ockeved by ow Canunise6nn's standards.

i 1

k la additlan to tu edaganan in essess e auto's peeral standards, Ow Cent.usum also has the wry ingsstars shhgatie en eneus that a stais's applicatues of standards that ddfr fien those sotablished by 1

the Cemndani m also ochieves a lawl of suhiliastle and ensalamais of f erticular eines, and a level d praisethm of pubhe lashh and the envininmers, aiuivalent to, to the esterv; psencable, ce greamt than, tr,i, level dist would be adusved by the Commlasinn's sundards.

CU 9410 PUlluC $ERVICII COMPANY of' NEW ItAMPsillRE, r, at (seebnme Sunm, Units i and 2),

twa Nos. 54d4ML,50 d44-01. (Offsite Ihnergency plannirA Opt; RATING UCLNSE; October M 1990, ORDLR

.i A

%e Cannnasian deus Innevenars' Emcssency b8stica in Renpen dw kacani m Ow Adapuy d on Siaffing af Ow N11RERP and far leone &sie Shundr en, concludmg that the request fails far lad of a showing of an octual safety pndeern to sugynet senpr,mg a choed seconi er plant shutdawn B

Pntiments of a settains makm bear ow %rden af nweging ali af the following requiremento (1) Os maint nest be Omely, exceps cien en sacer.innally grew issus may be ennsidered in the discretion of Gw pendmg eMost even if umirnaly pesorse4 (2)it snust addresa e sagruncers esimy or envinsunental I

leeus; and (3) li smaet denmetrate that a materl,0y ddfarers sesuk would be = would haw been likely had es newly proffered evidence been considerw' initially.10 CJA $ 2.73d.

C

~ N vaguest far senpening feua far a lack d ahowing of an usual safay pneders -

. Abses escopional dmanstaww. new louers e espressions af cancern oppaning a heense whuh D-see are themselve pnenptly devolged,a new infersuade sennot seen anew an opportunity far a timely senperdng metian. To permit a6herei a would seen a dont to shine and pmlong funhar already overinns

' es.

E 5peculatim about future refecu of budget curtaarnants or freeaes dass mas sanfy the Cmnmissian's seopening vequirement that a sir,ainsats safay issus must be addreened.

F Becease esis matur e. presented is devuld of safety signincance, the Commissimi sees no hkallhand whatsoever - tra alons a #4nestrsonn - that a materially ddforers sesuh would be or would have been l

likely had tw newly poffered evidence been considered initially.

l-i.

6 C

i 1

M e mm

-km--.-<-r-o-e v m va, N w--

mm

.e,,-mA.+ew~-+.e

<ww

-+-m m----

e-------

- - - ~ ~~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DIGl5FS IMilANCl.$ OF TIIE NL('lJ. Ak kiGlit.A10kV COMMLhlON C1J iK'11 ST ATT Or Ill ANO15. tham Na l'R W 1 M15C (Amaulnent No I to katian 214 Agreemma tietween NRC and Dhnnu), $1.CDON 274 AOkl1h0Xf; Novanhe: 3,19% Mt.MORANDUM AND OEDI it A

he Currumsaum daues Kan%<les's peutum far rmmandastam of its (ktder 17. 1990 (Wer (Ctj 49,32 NRC 210) shuh emed Kan WOne's aqmt for en adjuderskry hearug geve to 04ranutum arprm! of an omendnwu to de NRCAlhnma Asmenmt to allow lumna to assuna regulamy sucurity mer sa%m lle(2) bypratuct mawnal. he C<wmuseum fmds that Kate McGer has gwen en tense oby the further heanr4 that snust be held beforg 11hnas can impse tu dJledng standards smet be held onw. behne 111mcas has evei formulated a dersel plan daniled erusigh for a Cwntmanion determans% as w whrsher 11hnms' standarus maald s&m a levsl of pnwsm of puhhc health and Ow erwirunment equivalere to, or greews than, the level that smild be schwwed by Cammmene standards lhe Omenusum also dauen Kar4LOee's requot w stay any funher actkm m en Amaulmert w We N'40Alhnas Agreement.

I 7

a DIGESTS ISSUANWS OF Ti!E NIOMIC BAFLTY AND IJCENSING APPEAL BOARD 1 AIAB-934 PUBLIC $LRVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIGRE, et at (seahrmA Statim, Uruts 1 and 2), Dmier Nos. 54443 0L,5M64-OL (Offsite Dncrgency Plauting lasues); OPERATING UCENSE; My 9.1990; DLCitlON A

ne Appeal

Deard affirms that portion of the Ueensing Board decision in IEP 9412,

31 NRC 427 0990), that dismissed intervenor Seacnaat Anti-Pulluuan Imague fern the pricedmg being emem1ed by the Ucensing Board on canam runnded Lasues, B

Norwitt'staneng a subsequent endeavor to preserw arf ate eshts. an intervenor's artnamcanrra il of tu inimuan to walk away fmm Lasues en ranand before a heensing bosni because of disagreemas over es e5ect of the mund trpan fullpower licerse authorizat on fawlosa scy enutlement ht it may have had to parncipate on thcue leaues by way of a later spreal.

C The Ancel Board's a.Brmance of the diannasal of a Fny relating to the issues arising in one major segment of a caso does rwt affect that pany's ersillemas to participate in the adjudicaucu of edhe issues hat are now pmding or r lght sriae in wher panians of the case.

A!AD-935 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIGRE, et al. (Seahrook Statim, Uniu I and 2), Ducket Nos. 544434L. 50-444 0L (Offaite Emergency Planning luuca); OPERATINO UCENSE; August 20,1990; DECISION A

De AppealBoard affmna the Ucauing Boant's determmatim in LRP.8917,29 NRC 519 0989),

that h e;ylicanu' anergmey warning system for the Massaduseau pation of the Seabrook plurne caposure pathway emergency plenning see (EPZ) is in canpiianos with antw.ble ngulatory mjuiremens and guidance.

B An offaite emergency response plan naast establish "means to provide es:ty ruxancation and clear instruction to the poplace within h plume esposure patnway (U'll." 10 C.F.it 15a47(bX5). Moreover, subsequera to the time. tate and local government ofBeials are neu6ed of a situation ht requires urgent action, "(the design objectin d the pnunft public rntification system shau be to have the capahihty to essenttally complete the initial naincatum of the pubtw within the,,, EPZ within about 15 minies."

10 C F.R. Part 50, Anecea E. IIV.D3. See also NUREG-0654RMA REP.) (Rev.1), "Cnteria far Preparation and Euluatim of Radiological Emergary Responso Plans and Prepersoness in support of Nuclear Power Plania" (Nov.1930), Appaviis 3 (hemafter NURIG0654).

C A proper warning system should cornist of two esparate canpanenu: (1) an "alening signal" and (2)"ncaincation by cornmercial twoadcast (e.g., EBS)." NUREO-0654, An. 3, at 3-3. The " broadcast notincation* camponers Mftlla the regulsiory requirerners that the warning systan provide the means for

" clear instruction" to the public. Ses 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(bX5).

D De tonn " initial notification" as incorporatet in the "about 15 mimae" mparanent in 10 C.F.R.

Pan 50, A,mendia E,llV.D.3, was intended only to encornpaaa cavi aim of the signal that nottf6es the l

pblie that a radiolngical emergency exists so that they shouW Laka antepriate action to seek adauorul informatim (e g., by tming to e prescribed emergency broadcast statim).

E Appedia E to 10 C.F.R. Pan 50 is the only resdaiory timing requimnast for wanting sysurna, as such, it -not the NUREG0654 guidance -is the standard with which spplicants' warnmg system inust scmpty. Sce, a % lag taland Ughting Ca (3horeham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), ALAB-9CO, 23 NRC 275,290, review dcctined CU.8111,21 NRC 6(D (1988)

F That iegulatory guidance should be scrnewhat more demandmg than a regulaicry re;uisunent is an untowant as it acts to assure corg.ance with the regulatory requircmmt.

9

)

1

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile A10MIC S ARTY AND LJCENSING APPE AL. BOARDS O

(hven the dthreme in language af NUREO Or54, App 3, declanns that a warnmg systean shmld include the "le)spabihey for prmWg beth an a,en signal and an informational a instrucuenal message

, wih 15 minutes" and the language of 10 C.FA Part 50 Appendta E,IlY.D.3, that the systern have

. withm abow 15 minutes" "the capabihty to essentially complete the initial notincatam of the pubhc,

(emphases supphed), additional 1-EMA guidance raguiring only that the siren signal and EDS message le seivated (as cyposed to competed)"mithm L5 minutes"is in umformity whh the NUREO or$4 gmdancs.

11 EPZ t=amdaries are to be drawn io confonn smaally to pohncal juniadictima rather than stnetly at a radius ofim nJles Inun the facihty. See long Island llahting Ca (Shweham Nuclear Power Staum, Unit 1), C1J 87,12,26 NRC 383,395 (1917).

I While a warmng system should assure direct coverage of essentially 10t4 of the p5mlatsen wih 6ve miles of the she wih 6 hem punutes, these is some Reaibihty in terma d the perventage of populatim coversga that must be etesined by h mermns systern for remote, low population anu at a distance of more than five mi;ds from the facihty. NUREO.0654, Appmdia 3, Cnteria B 2.b and c; see IT.MA Oualance Mcnerandum AN.1, 'YDLA Action to Que5ify Alan and Nosification Systems Assinat NUREO.06541tMA. REP.1 and FDtA-REP.10" (Apr. 21,1987), Anach. I, et 12 to 3. his Aemibility, however, doce not aaneden a warning system whnee design fails to pmle an alert signal and an informatimalAnstructional massage to more prulated areas thenughout the enure EP7, includmg the 6ve to ten mile pution, wuhin Eheen minutes.

AIAB-936 PUBlJC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAkidit1RE, et al. (Seabrook Statum. Umts 1 and u, tkckst Nos $4443-OL,54440L (Offaita Emergeswy Manning lasues); OPERATING LJCENSB; August 20,1990, DECISION A

he A;yeal Board affirms the licensing Board's decision inISPM1,31 NRC 19 (1990), dasying intervmoa* mouon to reven the record and admit a new contenunn stative to the adequacy of the emergency broadcast system for the Seibrtd facihty.

B l'Ah of the three enteda ad forth in 10 C.FA 6 2.734(a) for reopmung af h secord amat be nus before a tuyening meum is grantal.

C If a veopening mo6m raises e emtemion not reviously in controversy, it amit also sausfy W aquinsnents for the admission c( unnmely conteroons ans feh in 10 C.FA 6 2.714(aXIXi)-(v).10 C.FA

$ 2.734(d1 D

he Commission's segulations requim that emergency **pmas plans "pnwide early naufication and cle r instnactim to the populace wih the plume empuure pathway baergency Planmng 7ene." 10 C.F.R 4 504(o)(3).

Appliurus for a fuD-power license are espected to *estabbsh a systen for dianceninaung to H

the public appropriate informathm,, inclu,has the appropriate unuasauon te a;yiurviate bmadca44 enedia, ag., the Ernersecy Broadcast $ stem (EDS)" NUREO-0654hYMA. REP 4 (Rev.1),

• Criteria f,w 3

Preparitien and Evsluethm id Radudogical Emergency Response Plans and Pnyaainess in Supput of Nuclur Power Plania" (Nov.1980), Cnwrion !! A5.

F Renas to en EB3 is one secognized method of providing syynynate nota tion. An EBS custanarGy is a netweth of radio and television statima voluntadly orgamned,in accorm with and subject to the regulations of h Federal Communicatima Canmission, to broadcast emergency mensages to b public in the event cf an emergency. See 47 C.FA 1473.901. 962.

O The fa:t eat a decision la issued as sa advisory epnion does not necessarily pceclude schance m iu reasming.

Il It may be assumed that in h absawe of cancelig cesarity evidawe, no panicipant in a staie-established ER$ nework will refuse to discharge its cannunication function in a tirnaly manner vpon the occurrence of a genuine emergency requiring public nonficatim. :,ee long Island I)ghting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unk l), ALAB.9tl,29 NRC 247,254-55 (19891

. For the situstum in which there is a nonpatticiptung state et local governmera, the Comnusaton I

has established a *%est efforta resumpion." Speci6cally,it assumes ht there wiD be *arsne *best efforf State and County response in the evan of an accident.. ht,,, wraal4 utiliis [the stility's) plan as the best source fa ernergency plaming informatim and opuans.* Shortham, C11#13,24 NRC 22,31 (19861 See also 10 CEA $ 5047(c)(tKiilh Massachusetts v. United States,856 F.2d 378 (lat Cir.1958).

It

.~

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF Tlir A10MIC SArl'TY AND IJCFNSING APPEAL S'MitDS 3

- The spmscri of a nTening m<sim have the bunten of demonstraung that the critana fm the grant of the aquested rehef have bem satianed. See Cleveland Electric Illununating Co. (Peny Nuclear Power liant, Units I srid 2), Clj%7,23 NRC 233,235 (1986), aff'd sub nom. Ohio v, NkC,814 F.2d 258 (6th Cir.1987); lausiana Power A laght Co. (Waterford 8 team Electric Sutian, Unit 3), CU.8&l,23 NRC 1,

- 5, aff'd sub norn. Opienhell Athance v. NRC,500 F.2d 1201 (D.C. Chr.1986).

K-if a Board 6nds that a reopening motim does not a& tress a significara safety w environmenul lame, it need nea decide whether the moticn was timely. See 10 C.FA I 2.734(a).

1, -

. A party's chim d bias may not rest merely upm disenchaniment with pruz Board miings. See, e s., Nenhern indiana Pubhc Service Cct (Bailly Ornersting Statim, Nuclear 1), A1AB.224,8 A!C 244, 24Mt (19N). See at o Seabruuk, ALAB-N8,18 NRC 18 64 (1983r, AIAB.749,18 NRC 1195 (1953),

.. A1AB 731,18 NRC 1313 (1981)

ALAlk937 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW IIAMPSilIRE, et al. (Seatsoom Staism, Unite I and 2), Dodet Nos. 54M301. 50 M4-Ot. (Ottaite Fanergmey Plaining lasuss); OPERATING 1JCF.NSE; sepsmber it,1990: DEt3sION A

b Appeal Bosni 6nds that the Licensing Board erved in LBP.89 32,30 NRC 375 (1989), by

&amissing an imarvenor conuntim concerning teacher abandonment of the role easigned to thesa in me

. utility 1pmsored smargency susp 4 plan. he Appeal Board penands the issue to tha 1)cenams Board for an esplovation of the fonowing: (1) whether there is tsaamable sasurance that a auf6cient msnbar of leadiers and day. cars paraenst will ful611 tnait easioned role, and (2) if not, are there satisfactory abernative arrangemaus for Ote fulA11mera of that sole by whers.

B Unless the Commission otherwise so discu, the Ageal Bosed may not attach "any weight" to staten.enia catained in immaliate effectiveness esserminatims. Scs 10 CF.R. ( 2.764(g)

C The essence of the realism mls, es set forth in 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(cXIXiii),is ihai,la smaluation et the edeguacy of a utility armsosed emergency asponse plan, the NRC will secogniza en *reshty that in

. an actual emergency, staie end local government ef5cials will aserstas esis best effona to putect the hoshh and safety of the public" By seese of this rampinion, the sectim dechree that "a may be pneumed (in the evaluation pucess) that in the owns of an actual radiological ersergency state and local of5cials would

.(;

ganarstly follow the utility plan."

1

?-

D On the tesis d tu history, it cannot be concluded that the roahan rule was intaded to ccwer school personnel such as the cleaaroom naachess espected to serve as bus escena under a utihty. sponsored emergency response plan, E,. N Agyest Board enay act paperly rely cui decinerus that have era been admined trao evidence in the record at hand.

.F-

"In terms the nelian rule apphee only to affwist actim ence an actual raergency has occurred and thus snakes no -

, a respecting pm emergancy cmluct.

- A1AB-934 VERM0eff YANK 12 NUCtfAR POWER CORPORA 110N (Vermont Yankee Nielear Power Sution).Docka Nm 542710lA (3 pent Ibel Pon! Amendmam); OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENTl

$ariamber 11,1994 N011CB

-A no Appel Board discu that tu pmiausly urublished aquest W aistincation l'om es Cornmissian he esponed in es NRC Issuenas. In AIAB-919,30 NRC 29 (1969), the Agpl Board aversed a Ucaming Board decimar, that a4ained an environmersal casemion, and certined its ruling to the C -

The Cammission espnJed by amanding the mauer for ths Appeal Board's funher cualdastian, panecing the Basrd to seek chriacation fmm the Comnession u to the precise lasue h is to ecstaider and the ymcodvas k should follow.

.D For the sake nf compleianess, previously apubhshed issuances may later be pubhahed in the NRC

'h imuances. Sea, e.g., taitaisna Pour A IJaht Co. (Waterfard Stearn Electric Station Umt 3), AIAB.529,

' 21 NRC 55 (1986)s

-C-

- The National Enviemmarsal Pnlicy Act of 1969 (NEPA),42 U.3C. {4321, and the *mle of

= isaacn" by which NEPA is to be interpnted do not require agencias to consider nunote and speculative events AIA10919,30 NRC 29,31 (1989).

.D An Appeal Board may eatify tu own decision to the Comrnissim when h Ands a deAnitive mling

-. would be in the public huneet 14. et 35,39.

- 11 f

d 1

[

,-en

. -,., ~.

e,

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF Tile ATOMIC SAFITY AND IJCIMINO APPE AL BOARD $

E

"(W}here a cmunuan is basad on a factual underpmrung in a document eat has been essertially repudiated by h source of that document, Se contentum may be diamianal unless the intervmor offers another independent soun:e? INbhc Service Co. of New llampshire (ScabnxA 5tatum, Unas I and 2),

CU 89 3,29 NRC 234,241 (1989).

F De Comnissim's Rules of Precues orduurity allow h suglementadm of contenums and their beam only upon a balancing of the live factats in 10 C.FA 51714(al(11 See 10 CJ A $1714M O

While reaching the "merus" of a ctemention at the admsas;on stage formerly usa prthibital, linustm Ughtmg and Power Co, (Allens Cred Nuclear Omursung Stadon, Unit 1), ALAB.590, in NRC 542,547, 49 (191to), the Cornmissim overtuled Llus pecedeu by smandmg the Rules of Praeuce to rapire that stutentions be rnore specific and supported with sufficient documenudon to show that a genuine issue of raaterian law or fact susu,54 Fed. Reg 33,168, 33.170, 33,110, 33,181 (1989) (codifal at 10 CFA 5 2.714(b)(2), (dX2) (1990).

11

%e rula adqxed in Sepember 1989 (i.e.,10 CFA 12.714(bX2),(d)(2)) ht nquire cmieraions to be more spe%inc and aumorted with sufficiert docummtatusi are ptepective onJy ALAB 939 PUHlJC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSillRE, se al. (Seabrook $tauon, Unita 1 and 2), Dmket Hus. 50443 0L, 504440L (Orisite Emergency Piannmg lasues), OPERARNO UCIWSE; Scomhr 23,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R REGARDINO ROT,RRED QUESTKANS A

he Appeal Itoent responds to quesuuns referred by the Ikensing Board in WIP.9thl2,31 NRC 40 (1990), emeerning the a<hupacy of shelianng putnisions in N Now llampehus Radiological Emersecy Raponse Plan (NilRERP).

B When a party property has been dismissed (nun a portam of the poucahng by h Ikensing Boani, the Appest lloant wdl nut emider ht party's subsapet sulunissim that retaies ducctly to en punm of the pmceeding fuorn which h was dismissed.

C As long as an emergency response plan contams shelwang as a potenual erargency seapmas opuen, the plan must conuin ditectices as to how to carr) otA such an opuan, even if that ostace is an unhkaly one.

D Ra follnwing technical issue la discusseJ: bnergency Plans.

AIAB440 PUBUC SERYlCE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSillRE, et al. (Seabrook Statim, Untu 1 and 2), Dodet Nos. $4443-01,1,5044t.01,1 (low-Power Testina); OPl;RARNO UCENSE; October 18, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

De Appeal Board affirms the Ucensing Board's docuien in IBP-39 23,30 NRC Ul (1989),

denyir:g intervamrs' motions to somit into en full-power proceeding laie.ftled contaatims or, in the ahernative, to reopen the secad based a lowtower tesung eversa.

B Section 50.57(c) of 10 CFA permits the grant of a lowtower hcese upcn the succesatul resolutam of an issues relevers to lowtower operadm. even ihough other issues gerinans to full ower t

operation venain to be vesolved in an angenng hcensing proceeding.

C De term *lowtower licaus" is geswr Dy understood to mesa an operndng beense authuizing lowtower testing up to Ave percent of rated power, See 10 CIA il2.764(fX2)0),(th),50.47(d); id. Part 50, Amendit E,llVS.I.

D A ' full poetr hcmae" genersuy authsizsa operade up to and includang the full thermal power rating of a faality, he tarm is used in instances when the facihty has aceived a sepeests lowtower beense, otherwise tbs term

• operating bransa"is undemnod to nuan a fullpower heaus.

E Because tastes e cmunervial raiclear isactor at any power level necessanly involves operadng the plars or,in the words of section 101 of the Atornic Faergy Act, anails the "uas" of a "utilizadon" facihty, lowtomer testeg can be conducted only alW the Commusinn granu sa apphcant a licaise to operate the plant. See 42 U,3.C 4 2131, F

Under section 189: of ee Auirnic Energy Act (AEA), intervenor bearing rights au:h only to a penceeding for the granting of an inaial operaung bconas, 42 U.S.C. (2239s. %e APA affords no intervoor headng rights relatne to activines occurnng as a consequente uf facility opratim undertakes pursuant to such a bcense,includmg lowtower Lating O

While now power.iesting is material to the cecreticn of a f acihty, such testing performed under the authrrisy of a full ower Ecmas is not materut to the granung of a fulltower hcmse, t

13 l

k

.-~g

ll DIGESTS iss0ANCICS OF Tile ATOMIC SAWTY AhiD IJCENstNG APPEAL BOARDS II.

twpower arwl power.ascenske testmg are mattse of bcense canpliance, not ini6al beasure,

_ and cierefore, no intervenor heating nghia accanreny a bcauce's performance of such testa.

l

. l In order to comply with the beanng sights previam of sectmn 189a of the Atomic Energy Act, p

the low-power licmse can be granted only after all inaws in the can.asted adjudicatory panceeding sencvant to low-power testing authorization have been heard ar.J donded by e ucensing Board. Ses to CFA iL l 50.57(c).

r J-Nadung in the agency's regulainors dictaios that low-power testing need be completed succenfully as a pacondthan to the grara of a fulkpom-or bcame in ordar to mens the minimarn ngulatory requirements for a fu!Lposw licenas.

K he NRC's formal enforcement sanctama, whkh includs conces of violatima, ciel pma16es, and various orders such as hconas revocane er suspension orders, sequin prescnbed nonce and hvanns prweshires. See 10 CFA Part a, Appendia C,i!!,id. Il2.201 205. In eddium, NRC anploys less formal administradve medianisms, such as confirmatory sc6cn neuers, to supplement us enforcernent pmgram. Ses id. Pan 2. Agendia C, iVi!.

L An enforcement actim conostning low power tesdng suihcrued by a previously granted low power license, is indepmdent of, and immaAist to, any subsequent Comminainn tweming daarminanon that z

splicants not all naulatory seguirements is a full-power beenas.

M As ha name connoies, prerperational testing is conducted as pn of the constnaction process for j

the plart pursuant to 10 CFA 9 50.56 hefore an openting heatsa for the facihty is issued. Such teanns does not Involve the 'bes" of the facihty widun the meaning of secnon 101 of the Atornic Emergy Act and hence does not equire an opasting heanae, N.

NRC connnt generically anclude fann operating license heanngs issues that he own segulades noke matedal w the bcensing decisiert See Union of Cazamed Sciennats v. NRC,731 F.2d 107 (D.C.

Cltc1984), cen, demed,469 U.S. I132 0985).

l 0.

A auslan to nopen the record must sainfy each d the fouowing cnteria: 0) h neat be timely, (2) k amist addess e signincant safety issus, and (3) h umst demonstrate that e nuierially different resuh

' woulJ have been bkely.10 CFA 6 2.734(a).

l P

"(T)o jusufy the grunnns of a modon to emipen the moving papers raust be stams enough, in

- the light of any egosing tilings, to avesd swomary dispacinort" Vwment Ysakee Nuclear Ptreer Corp.

1-

+

(

(Verman Wakes Nuclear Power Statim) ALAB 138,6 AEC 520,523 (1973).

1 The most imputant of the pues enteria fue senperung the record is the raising of a signincant i

Q I

edety iseut PhiladelgNa Elecnic Co. (umerid Oenerating Station, Units I and 2), AIAB.g34,23 NRC 263,2M 0966), -

.R1 Ir. ihe caussi et a claimed Monation of de Commissim's quality assumace aguladens, *[flut new ;

l evidence to raias a signiAcent safay issue" for purposes of peopenas ties ranrd, k must estabhsh either -

l that unconected,,, enors endanger safe plant operation, or that then has been a breakdown of the quality

assurance program sufEcient to saise legitimais doubt as in the plant's capshility of bems opeated safe!y."

b, Pacine Oss and Electric Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unita I and 2), AIAD,756,18 NRC l.

1340, 1345 (1933), see also Union Electric Co. (Canaway Plant, Unit 1), AIAB.740,18 NRC 343,346 ji

. (1933).'

ALAB.941 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMP51DRE, et al (Seabrook Staion,' Units I and

- 2), Dodet Nos $M4340, SM44-OL (Offsite Emergency Planning less); OPERATINO LJCENSE; Novemher 21,1990i DECi210N A

In saamining irservenor spreals agarding centendona e the scope of a " full panicipadon'-

t lE 9; esercise addressed by the Ucensing Board in IEP.89 32, 30 NRC 375 0989), and in an anpublished L

M and Order (Dec, 15, 1984), the Appeal Bonal affirms the Ucensing Besid's dispostion

-- of cenain contaratens, averses a Beard determinatim nia:ing to participation by school officials in the saarcias, and dismisses as mnot the MasaAO's appeal from the Basal's dispontion of a ponion of a consention meanhas utiluation of a inobile alerting systern during the sancise, B-Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, an apps!! ate diallenge to the rejecnon of a contention J

. in an interlocutory erder must await the renditinn of a Licennna Board initial decision encompsasing the

. subject mauer et the contention. See 10 CFA 6 2.730(f); Northem state Power Co. (l'y:me Energy Park, Unit 1), ALAB492,8 NRC 2510978)..

l' 1

p

,4.

E ls E

4

~

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF Tile AlOMIC SANTY AND IKlhSING APrF AL llOARDS C

A "catenum" shmid be a statement of the issue amght to be hugated while the %ses" scarnredymg the cmtentim should be the factual aucgaums that primde scene credible foundaum for the cetann See 10 CJ R.12714(b).

D Appendts F, l!Vf.1 ef to CJ R retpires a full parucipuan emergency preparedness sacruse wWda two years befoto the inauence of a full-pmer opersteg heanse.

E Both the C<rnmissim's reguleGons and the "fundamanal Saw" cnterion gmerning the admission of saarciao related cordauims estabbah that a contentum quesuming the adequacy of the scope of a full panicipation eserviae is annyriate as pan of an adpdicatory chauenge to the sufficterry of the esemae.

Las taland IJghnng Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Una 4), ALAB 900,28 NRC 275,215 93, sview dechned, Clitt-l1,23 NRC 60) (1988)

F De r, cope of a full perdeipadon eienise is m enemps the

• maps observable portums" of both msite and ofte,te emergency plana (includmg the mobihtanon of sute, local, and appbcant personnel and sesmatesk in a manner auflisimt w verify that,in the corgest of the accidan scenano, emergency respense capabihty is adequais. Shorcham, ALAB.900,21 NRC at 292 93 (ciung 10 CfA Part 50, App. E,(!YJ.1 a d).

O he pupcse behind allowmg bugauon relauve to an eacmse is to asceruin if there ers any fundamasal flaws in the emergency plan being tesied.

11 A facihty's piblic alen and no65caum systan is a " major observsble perum" of an effatte emergency plan. See Shoreham, ALA'r900,28 NRC at 2%

1 he anagawy teoakast system (Ells) pntion is "an ansegral compment c4 the pubhc nou5 canon systan," Shmham, ALAB-900, 25 NRC at 294, as la the other mapr canpmas - the stren alerung systarn, Each campment must funcnon adapately in order for the pubhc nouncatum systen to be fuuy agrataonal.

I he Anal IBLA test or Andmas smeermng the strce ayutem design need not be cornpleted pnor to a ucmoams Dosni Andtag cowernmg the adequacy of planning enons neerding the sysian. Camlina Power A Light Co. (3hearta llarns Nuciar Power plant), ALAB 452,24 NRC 532,546 (1986).

K De cure for an saarise scope deAcumey is to provuis fcr tesdng of the relevant sunironers in a sumadsat sancisa Shoreham, C1184 il,24 NRC at 6N.

L he pimtso of 10 Cf.R. Pan 50, Am. E, IIVJ.1 that en enescise must test sa auch of the emergency plan as is " reasonably eduevable wahout mandatory puhhc parucipatam" does not amanny eneropt frorn parucipatim in the sacrcise a psivate ernergency sehef organisauan idte the Amencan Red Cross (ARC) whose parucipaum is cutanplated by a particular emergmcy plan.

M he timing of the EBS bmakast, u opposed to the sounding of the suens, is inelevara to cedience wius the 15 minute inidal rusifica6on itquucment of to Cf.R. Pan 50, App. E, l!V.D.3.

See ALAB-935,32 NRC 51,68 49 (1990s.

N While the "participatuut of stata and local goverrenana in an anersecy eserstas is not required to the satent that the applicant has idetified those gernments refusing to participate," to CIA Pan 50, Am. E,(IVE.6, such eaanpuca la not appbcable to the ARC as a pnvais cegamaatim.

O Anmdia E,IIVf,1 n.4 er to CSA Pin 50 declares that response renonnel and resources are to be mcbiliaad in "suf5cias eumbas to verify the cambility to resped to the accsdent scenarn" In the content of determining the ametyriam acope of an encrcias, ascertaming just what are "suf6ciesu otrnbers" involves the splicatim of reasoned judgment that takes so.: cunt of both the traicacies of the energency plan, as cell na the general exacise objective of testmg the adopacy of the plan.

P Activation cf two of twr planned reception casars, each of whMt was roughly reprteaustive of one af the unsctivated reception centers, constuutes "sufncias numbas to verify the capshihty to sosped to the accidas scaiano." 10 CEA Part 50, App. E, l!VI.I a.4.

Q in aDeging that emergency plan de6ciencies, sa revealed in an esercise, are suf6cient to stggest a fundamernal flaw in the emergency plan that requires secrection, the casentions enust be "well-focused" and "conome" with " greater detail" than nonenercise corsenuossa. Shoreham, AIAB-903,23 NRC 499, 506 (1984)

R A contauton'a reference to a RMA report on an saarcise, withota even specifying what pan of the repost might pmvide a f amdation ' r its auegatims,is Wully waruing under the sundant which requires that anergency plan contasma be "s-& focused." See CU-89 3,29 NRC %)4,2441 (1989) 14

DIGITIS IssOANCFS OF Tile ATOMIC $4 LTY AND IJCl'N5!NG APPEAL, BOARDS S

• [T]lw potennal essmatmn of adools within the emergency planning ame (174) is a make element of affaite mergmcy planmng* Shoreham, AIAB 9f2,28 NRC at 291 T

• A sumcient nurnber of school and stated periamel must.. parucipate in a full parucipanon esercue so as to permit verifwation of their integrated capaMhty to resped to de acculent scenano."

shoreharn, AIAB.900,28 NRC at 291 U

An nortise that enempanies a reasmaMe rervesentauve aarnple for sad school category -

phlic, private, and nurserylday-cars - mamas the *verificanon of (the s&ools') tntegra'ad capability to esped to the accidert scenarut" Shareham, AIAB-900,28 NRC at 297 V

Cmeerning leners of esmmers (LDAs) that tw companies have with appheants to auist in evacuatmg special needi poplanons, the ymaMhty that sonw ntrunam cirwmstance - sud as, for nample, a regim. wide bus drivers' etrike - will preclude the fulfdlmera d the terms of the IDAs does not cosutitute a *fedamental Raw"in es anergency plan. $a $horeham, A1AB 9Q1,28 NRC at 505.

W la no cinumsiance can a lack of apgmynate sepe in an esercise per es estaMish a fundamenul

$sw in dw ptan that is the subject of that enestne. Rather, the nault of an undaly hnuted esenue, in addinen to umcompiance mih the Cunnussian's regulatums requiring full parucipataan, is an inabihty to determine whether the plan is, in fact, fundamentally Rawed in soms esser.ual respect.

AIAB442 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIDRE, et al. (Seahmok Statum, Unas I and 2), thdet Nos. SGMwl, SM440t, (Offsite Emergency Plauung luues); OPERATING UCENSE; December 21,1990; DECislON A

la ensnunmg the Ucatsmg BosnPs rejection et the threshnid of war.uus intervenor c mtentums umcerning (1) the emergewy toepmse plan for the Masaschusests porunn of the Sembred plume esposure pathway emergency planning gone (EPZ) and Q) the resuha of a full patucipation nerctae of the plans for both the Massachusetts and New llamrahire portions of the 174 the Apsal Board rewnes the Ucensing Board's determinathm that it lacked jurisdictuut to omnder e omternim concernmg pedetermined proicctive actim reccanmendaties; dismisses an intervens's spreal relative to three corvauima for want d adequate briefing; and 6Mrms the Ucmaing Board's aber $reshold dispmituma of corsennons.

B What one proceedmg is divided true two puses, the Ucaums Board la not required to atlee an intervmor to nhtigste in the noemd phans an issue adequately esplosalin the 6 nit phase if the issue does not take on a differet ceplenion insofar as the accend phase is concerued.

C

• [A)mang asher eings, the ekmiographie and snamenlogwal charactensta:s of a particular Ff2 nught haw cmaiderable innuence upon the percentage of the persons minin the Ff4 that weld, in the owns of an acciJcus, sack nueiinaring enher on instrucum er an their own initiative." Img taland Ushung Co. (Shonharn Nucient Ibwer Stauen. Unit 1), AIAW905,21 NRC 515,526 (1988).

D It la leg settled dut an interveur in an operinns license pniccedag is muitled to crosa-enamme m those poruons of a witness's testimony that relats in issues placal into contamrsy by encaher pany w the pimmeding Noithern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Omcisting Plant, Units I and 2),

A1AB-252,8 AEC 1175, affd, CEl 751,1 NRC 1 (Un5). Uraler recera ammuknaus in the Radse of Practice, however, an tuervens muy nm Ene propsed find 2ngs of fact and cmclusims oflaw on, or appeal the dispositim by the Ucenseg Board ef, any issues net placed (or sought in be pla:ed) in cetroversy by that lmervonor. See 10 C.F R. I 2.%2(d)(1) (1990).

E Regulatory sedance provides that the smsrgency response plan include the"[ildenuAcanon of and encans for cesling mth paennal nmpedimatts (ag., seasonal impassabihry of rcada) io use of evacuation soutes, and centingency ine.sures." Caitarion IU.lak of NUREO.0654 NEMA. REP 1 (Rev.1), " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Fmergency Response Plana and Preperedness in Sugyart of Nuclear pimer Plants" [ hereinafter NUREOu54) This plainly recognism that there may be occasims when clunatic cnnditions wdl tenter mods impassable. Shahenns is, of course, the generally acknowledged ehernative to evacuatim and, as such, quali6es as a "contagency measure" in the evmt there are impedunants to se use of evacuatim routes.

F Allegations of Ucenamg Based armr ma accanpanied by an explanation of why the Board was wrong will be disrnissed wkhout furthat consideration.

0

"(A) fundamental flaw in an emergency plan, as revealed in an mercise, has two pnncipal compcnans." With respect to the 6 tat - the exercise "re.ftects a failure of an esamtial element of the plan (nd mimne or isolated problems m the day of the esercise.,." Respecting the seced component 15

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF 'lllE ATOMIC SAFl.'fY AND (JCIASISG API'l'.Al,It0ARIE

- ee Raw "can be remedied only through a signincant revision of the plan" and "where the problem can he acadily correctal, ths Raw cearun ressmably be charactenard as fututamerui.* Shmeham, ALAB kB, 28 NRC 499,505,506 (1988).

11 A conternion that falls to provide even maumal aumat for its vr.ain conclusmnal alleganon lads the necessary bens and aperthuy.

I lt is not the naperudubty d the licanatng Dosrd (or te Ameal Bonn!) to sugly the basis informatim necessary to sustam a cutanim. See l'haladelptua twn< Co (llmerd Otnerating Staum, Unha 1 aral 2), ALAB 8% 21 NRC 587,592 r 6 (1915).

I Tbs emergency planmna vnquireman in 10 C.F.R. ( 50.47(b)(10) and the guidance in b"URI;O-Or54, Cntaim IlJ.10.m. indicans mly that, in propanns an auergency f an, a

• range of pnsecuve acuans" i

shradd be cmsidered and that es bases for the choice of peutective acters he set forth in the plart See AL.AB 924,30 NRC 331,367 n.164 (1989), petitions for revicw pending K

1has is no time bmitaten speafted in the regulatons wuhm which en evacuston must be comrdened. See A1.AB-932,31 NRC 371,408 A n.167 (1990).

L la creating separate bccraing teards in consider the vanous insines that nwy be pasanal wulun a sing's bcename proceedng, the authauy of each board to act (at least in the stvence of any Canminaion duective to the contrary) is governed by the " jurisdiction" allncased to that board by the Omf Admirustrative Judge of the IJcensing Board Penel, usually by way of a bosaf consutuuan runics See Shoreham, ALAB.

901,23 NRC 302,307-Og A sL6, review dechnsd, CLJ 88-11,25 NRC 6(O (1948); AIAB 916,29 NRC 0 4 (1989).

M The Rules of Practice place no affttmadve obbgauan m a pny to request IAenams Buent to reconsider its nahng that is affected by a laict Ameal Board deciaim N-he dia:retimary case managernatt tool of the una of muluple bcensacg boards in a single proceeding cannot be esed to the detrunau of a pany's rights. Sharuhan, AIAB 902, 28 NRC 423, 430, review dechned Ctj al 11,2s NRC 603 (1948).

O A pany is not obliged by the Rules of Pracute to seek duected ceruscenart. a discraimary form of review.

P If,in daernuning that a poruon of a !Jeaning Doerd emergency planning determinauun must be reverned, en Ameal Board is mable to emclude that there ers signi6 cant deficiencies in an ernargency plan for whuh adequate canpensating measums do act aust,li does not have gunmda far the attreme measure of licame suspenaien. See 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(c)(1).

Q FW the puqxas of deternunmg the Urnchness of the alening and no66cstion process, a de:ilim to initiate d.a process cannot reasonably be said to be Analimi until there has beca not mly a daerminatie that the airen alening syntan should be actnsud but also a decision ahmt what Emergency Brundcasung System messages should be udbred.

R la contraa to the urne cmstrainta delmented in 10 CIA Pois 50, Am. E,4 IV.D.3, wuhin which stata afncials must be nrained of the declaration d an emergency by a licenses and the tm e withm wtuch initial runincadon snun be completed, there is no regulatory mjuimman estabbahing a speciSc nmef rame for a decision to besta notincation fehowing the declarstire of a panicular emergency classincation.

In cerarsat to its clear svovisims for mnruiming and decamminauen for mane pernmnal and effane anergency workers, NURiiO.0(64 fails to make any memien of the need far da:orsamination for evacunes. Compare NUREO 0654 Critesia 11J.3.4, IIL7 (mtsutoring and decontanunation for annue persarmel) and id. (Rev.1, supp.1) Critenon !!13,.5 (dosimeter distnhutmn and deemtammatim for anrrgency waken) with id. Cruerian 11J.12 (nsmitoring of evscuees).--

T A de6ciency that may be corncted by relatively minor, sodinonal trainms, rather than a signiacant redesign of the plan, does set consutute a fundamental naw.

U

• (A) panicular person's failure to follow the requirements of the anstgency plan itself will not be considered a fundamanal Raw unless the pemm la shown to perform a citthal sole and there is no backup structure that would miugate the effects of the individuare failurs Shottham, AIAB 903,28 NRC at 505-06.

V

. One of the purpcses of the speci$cuy sequirement is to psa the other *penics m notice of what imucs they will have to defend or opposs," Philadelphia Elecuic Co. (IJmenck Generaing S'auon, Unita i and 2), A1AB-845,24 NRC 220,210 (1986).

16

l 4

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF Tile ATOMIC SA)f TY AND IJCl:NSING APPEAL, BOARDS W

"Secuan 2.714 [of to CIA. does run permit) the Aluig of a vague, unparucularued conten6ca, followed by an endeavur to Rah it cut thmugh duemery assmat the appbcent ur staff." No IWor Ca (Cauwbs Nuclear Sudon, Units 1 sad 2), A1.AB.687,16 NRC 460,468 (1932), vacated in pan on other smunds, CU 8319,17 NRC 1041 (1983X ses Nenhen Sutes Power Ca (Prairw Island Nuclear Genersung Ptara, Units I a,ul 2), ALAB-107,6 AEC 188,192 (1973), aff'd sub runn. Dosiness and Professional 3%ople for the Public Interest v. AEC,502 F.2d 434 (Dn Gr.1974). By the same tokat, en intervena should not be allowed to transfer the burden of fishing esat a vague contenuon through ducovery by the appbcanta and staff.

[

X While 10 CJ.it, 6 2.714 does not require that all nuierial factual infamanon supparung a ermtenuon be dischmed in puviding a basis for the contentim,in putung fath a canumtum a party enust enake a showing sufEcina to dernestrate to the IJcensing Board "that there has been suffmera foundatum

]

assigrud for it to wartsst funhar espearstum." itiladciphia Dectne Co. (1%ach Bottan Auxele Power Station, Units 2 and 3), AIAB-216 8 AEC 13,20 (footnae enutied), sev'd in pan on othat gnunds, CU,7432. 8 AEC 217 (1974) e t

4 g

f 17

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC 3AWTY AND LlCIW5tNG BOARDS UIP 9421 CURATOR $ OF Tl!E UNIVIR$fiY OF MISSOURI, Dociet Nos. M00270,34022744RA (AsulP Na 9461342-MIA) (TRUMP-3 Pioject) (Dyproduct Ucense Na 24 00513 32, $pecial Nuclear Materials Ucese No. SNM 247); MATTRIALS UCIW5E AMENDMENT; My 9,19M MEMORAN-DUM AND ORDER (Intervenors' Maian for Duected Cenificasim)

A De Presuling Officer denies Iraervenars' untion for duwed certification tiecause they failed to show a prima facie case hat there were special circumstances aw;umns the waiving of the procedural agulation,10 C.FA $ 2.12050), that pernuu the Staff to issus traues durms the pndency of special maienals cases.

U laservawes have the bunten of punof to estabhnh a pnma facu case that there sie special circummances psafyms a waiver of a Commissim regulation They canna cany their burden through mere sanerta, without occampanying affulavita.

C An allegal right to a prior hearms &ws am, by hacif, gwids grounds for an ea<egeim to a waiver of 10 CF.R.12.12050), whkh permits the Staff of the Ccamssim to issus beense ammenents during the pendancy of a procealing. Ibsthermore, there is no regulata rwtuinry the Su!! to issue " positive findman" as a peerequiske to isat'ng an ammhnait. %ere must, therefore, be en evidentiary showing of e

why k is instgeopiate in a particular case est the Suff Lake the authorized action befas an sacepnon or waiver snight be granted.

UlP 94M RORIDA PO%T.R AND UOlfT COMPANY (Turtry Point N clear Generating Na, Umsa 3 and 4), Ducket Nos. 542540lA 5,54251 OIA 5 (ASLBP Na 9460241-OLA 5)(Teduncal spa:ifica.

tirms Replacement)(Feeility Operating Ucense Nos. DPR 31.DPRdik OPERATLNO UCENSE Ah0WD MFNT; My I8,1990; hEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Manon to Dunniss)

A De Board dismisses the sole Intervenor as e pany based on changed circtanstances. Sundmg fa the lmarvenor was based en ons enernber, who was employed wuhin $e ame of buerest of the pknt, but who was dinnissed from his )h. Give the pdor history of the case, in which the sole Intervonor alnady had $4 eppartunity to aher that h had bases for stan&ng a&iaimal to that of this one member, the Board 6d na affont any funhet olyortunity to show new bases for sunding. De dechinal was whhcut preju&ce to a motion to reopen should the mornber demonstate in has penduql Depenment of bbe acnan in whkh that Applicant was responsible for his wrongful dischstge frorn employmau.

11 Whrsi an organiastion suffers a change of circumstances such tha ks standmg is affected, ordinarily it snay danestrate an thernaive ground for standmg. Ilowever, what the wgsnization alnady had the cpportunity to dememstrate an ehernative gamed for standas and failed to do so,it will na be affordel a secred typortumty, (his tule may ad apply, however, to the later stages of a pmcee&ng after extensive htigation has already occurmt.)

C When the only paniapsung intervenar is disuissed, a Board may imam prisdiction to determins whether er eat to ensrcise its authwity to nuke one or inors of the pendmg contendans a sue sparue inaue because h is at Isaas importara to safety or the envinumers,10 CFA $ 2.760s. It may ad for a brief on the issue from the remaining parnes.

LBP-9425 CIIVELAND ELF 4TRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et at (Perry Nuclear Power Na, Unit I), Docket Na 5444401A 2 (ASLDP Na 94605-02 OIA); OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMFAT; July 23,1990; hEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Dmying Stafra and ucensee's Motions for Recmaider, stim) 19

DIGl'STS ISSUANCl3 OF Tilf ATOMIC 54YTY AND l.lCENSING BOARDS A

nia Manorandum and Order dmies neuuns for recmsiderstma filed by (Jeansee and staff of ISP#ti,31 NRC 501. IEPMIS revewed a pedum to intersee and contanum filed in resemas to a notwe inacatmg that liensee had appled for en amen &nas to ha gerstmg licaum that wtadd delets cycle-specifu parameter limits md etiwr cytle specine fuct informatinn fran the Perry Technical Specificatima and suhetaute a petmsinn allowing I Acemes to set these hmais in acenrd with NRC epproved methodology

%s eummuim raised an argument that grant of the ammenas win unlawfully deprive Petiuoner of its hearing rights under (189s of the Akume Energy Act. In thu Mmcrandum and Order, the Board affirmed its holdmg that if the twenas amendmsra vested any suhstanual decreum in thensee in determining the cydespecific parameter lunas,it might well depive Pett6oner of beanns rights confened by Iil9a of the Atomic Faagy Act. %s ficard edndtted the Peutumer and its conter$um in order to afhrd Peutioner the opputumty to emfront $taff's factual argumna that the amenennt wtadd not have thu sUect D

5ec6cn 50.36 d the Cernnussim's regulatsma mquins that power reactor Teduncal Specincauma inust include those maners as to which the impasitiai of rigid camditions or hmissimns is no:essary to chvists the possibdity J an abnormal saus6cn or evas gmng sise to an immediais threat to the pubbc health sat ufay CydespeciAc parameter hmits are such awuers. %e Conunimim may mm abdicais its nupmaibibty to review and apsme hcense senendment eglicauma that raias such rnatters by graming licensam substantial discretion ' t determinirg them.

s C

An imavested enenber of the pubbe is enutled to sa oporttsuty for haanns on an appbcans for sa anwndmet to a power teactor heensa IEP M 26 All CitEMICAL ISUTOlt ENRICllMINT, INC,, Dodet Nos. 50403, SMN (ASIEP h 29 5401 OM/5C) (Consuuctkm Permit Nos. CPEP-1 and CPES2), CON 33UCDON PERMIT MODI.

I-lCATION AND SilOW CAUSE; July 24,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruhng on NRC 5taff Mainn fw Sunawary Diseminen and Disreissal of Proceedes)

A Secuan ll6(a) of the Asamic Faergy Act, sa amended, snakes licenses far nudsat faci!nies subject to revocadon for p avlicensing falhares. If the post hemams em&tums wmld have war amed the Commisakm to refute to grant a heense on en enginal apphcation, the hcense can be rovdad.

B Sectkm 2.149 of 10 C.F.R. pernuta seimary &aposiuon to be used to decide the uhunate isan in au types of proceedings except in the saae of the lasuance of consuuction permits for a pmductum facshty.

here, suusnary diapsitim only may he emed for the desamination of speanc subontmate issues but am to decrmine the slumate issue as to whahar the pennit shall be inausd.

IEPN27 CURAWRS OF TIIE UNIVI'RSITY OF M15500R1, thxAa Nos. 7400270, M022784RA (ASIEP No 9461102-MIA)(IRUMP 3 Pmject)(BypmductIJeanse h 24 00513-32; Special Nuclear Materiata (Jcenas M $NM 247); MATTRIA13 LJCENSE AMODMENT; July 30,1990, MEMORAN-DUM AND ORDER (Cornpleaenrse of the lleanna File)

A he poesiding etncer issued an onier rayairing die Staff of the Nuclear Regulatmy Ceaumanion to canply with the guidance trutiaDy issued ' t IEPM22 and to cornplete the beanns b by includmg in e

it all reports and doewnents that latervemus might renamahiy consider islevant to their sanitted staas of concms B

De pasiang d5cer is responsible for determming the cmten of the hearing fde. The Statt may not infuse to be a party, thcaeby permitting decisions to be made concerning the concerns to be ednuued, and then refuse to complete the beanns b with respect to those concerna.

C De pasence of a documas in the puhhc documatt toan in Washingsm, D.C., does not escuse las being served en the parnes who there is no local pubhc document suom.

D Section 30320)(1) of 10 CF.R. appears to require that splicanana to posess ruaosc6ve maianals in unsealed fann shmid demonstrate bt the matirrawn ame to a peuvas off site wdl be no enore than 1 nun effeaive dose equivulas er 5 nans to the thymid a stam1J enntain an emeramey plan for respmans to e velasse of rs&oec6vs materials. %ia sectim aus ein seem selevira to whether an am'.icanm must demonstrate that the materials bems used wiU nm be &apased by are or esplosim.

LEPM28 RODEKT 1. DICKJII'RBER, Ducket Na $5 5041SC (A&lEP h 9461401 SC) (EA 94031)

(Smier Operator IJemae IJmierd w Ibeillandhng, Na $OP 2365-8), and COMMON %TAllit liDISON COMPANY (Quad Cities Nuclear Power station), Docket Nce. 34254 OM, 50 265 OM (A$1EP No.

94M02 OM) (EA 94032) (Facihty Operudng IJcenas Nos. DPR49 and DPR-30); ENIORCEMINT; 24

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SMTTY AND LICE:NSING BOARDS August 1,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Amamng Settlanent Agreement and Tarnunatmg

roceadmsi)

A The Ucensing Bustd afproves a settlemera Agreernent between fu parues and ierminates two atfortement proceedess.

D Where a Nodce ofIlearing has been issued, a Ucensing Board is authorized to amrove ternunahon d an enforterners proceed ng on the bass of a seulemas agreemat *accordmg due weight to the posium of the staff." 10 CIA (2.2tn.

UtP-9429 OEOROIA POWER COMPAhT, et al. (Watie Electric Genersung Plant, Units 1 and 2), Ducket Nos. 54d24-OLA, 50 d25,OLA (ASLBP No. 94617-03 OLA) (Fecihty Operating Ucense Na hW.48 and hW 81h OPERATINGIJCENSE AMENDMENT; August 16,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (latervanwn Petition)

A-In a paceeding involving a ptrposed anwndment to en operaung hcenas todmical spect6cauan, the Ikensmg Bosal cmsiders the s&nissitality of a peutum fa huervenien, estakduhes Ehng datre for further submissions, and schedules a preheanns conference to consider thw questwo.

B Under governing rules, to be seniued to a paceatag, e potaaul intervenor must demonstrate that k has sundmg to participate and past proffer at least one acceptable coniention Contenuaa need not amsar in h buervention petition itself but, rather, are to be set fonh in a supplement Eled not later ha 15 days before thn ftret geheanns confuence.

C A potential intervenor may amend lu interventwn petitum wahmt leave of the Bosni until !$ days

(.

F or to the fust prehearing contennce.10 Cf A ( 2.714(a)(3).

i I

D A petiuoner for keerventon in an NRC pmmhng anay not bue us standmg on nicroice to its l

parucipation in other proceahnss, twth NRC and atherwue.

E To estahluh standing to parucipate in a panicular perseding, a ptitioner must show that the subject matter d the paceadmg will cause " injury in fact" and that the injury is arguably within the "gone of interesis" panected by b Asomic Energy Act of 1954, as ammded, or b National Envirmmanut Policy Act, es amendat.

F Where a pectioner fur interversion is a group er arsenisauen, k may enabimh standies either

- through ha own organizatimal interests or through the interests of lu umznbers. In past teacier licenamg or hcave amendrnas paceedings, residence or anployment of a petimner wuhin 50 miles of a facihty has been sumcias to demmstrais that a paitimer's interest may be affecied by the pr-Ang.

O If npresentmg the inteesu of one of its owmhers, a group must derncauttate by afAdavit of that member that k is authorized to apresent that member. De group antst also Jrnmatrets ht it has authorized the represonative appearms on its behalf to reptM the group's huerest I.BP-94 30 CURATORS OF 'l1IE UNIVERSITY OF A0354. D*kat Na 7400270, 3402278MA (A5LBP Na 9461542 MLA)(Re: TRUMP 3 Project)Mypoduct Licane Na 24 4 0513-32; Special Nuclear Materials thanas No. SNM-247% MATT. RIAL 5 UCENSE AMINDMENT; August 24, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Tanporary Suy Rapest)

A The pneiding ofncer in this Subpert L paceedmg dased a sequest for a ternporary stay of Ikatses's planned aspentneras wi1 nepomium and plutonnen. l(e said ht he uneestood why the documano availatde to inservenars has caused than concera emmt the safisy el the plannal work. liowever, after reviewing the detailed techracal response Eled by Licenses, the prasid' g omcer was satis 6ed ht nme a

of the grounds for a stay existeJ and he denied the say, B

Puriums to 10 CIA (2.1261, the pesiding omcar may issue a stay in aspman to Inervanors' motion fcr a suy. whidi they included with their requen fa a hearing. In this case, the presklieg efikst l:

had deferred action en the may motion included with the request llence the terms of seoira 2.1263 refet I

to 10 CSA I2.788 for the standards governing the grenting of a suy c( the Staff's beensms sctioru

(

Under ht sectias, h crheria for determining whether er not to grard a t'ay are set faith in subsection (e).

l Additionally, subsectica M permha a tempenry stay in extraonhnary cases, even withat waitmg for the

&g of any answer, in this instanos, the presiding emcer was able to sweit an oral answer and a wnuai answer fresa lleenaeo bdore acting cm the motion for a temporary stay.

C Applications for spreial materials licensee and bypoduct maierials heaues must demestrate

-ht they are 44x;uate to potect health and muumsze danger to hfe or poperty pursuant to 10 CSA ll 30.33(a)(2) and 70.21(a)(B They must also comply with 10 CFA 6 20.106, which limits the eatent to f'

21 l-l l

l l

DIGESTS tss0ANCES OF Tile A10MIC SOTTY AND (JCENMNG BOARDS wtuch 1Aensee may releais neptunium or plutmium buo the air or wster in excess of natural badground radiatawt D

hase regulatims are intepreted in Regulatory Guide 10.3, ehuh requuss a deuiled desenptar of the equiptunt, facihties, and instntmentatum, nl - for chemical a physical pmcessmg cyerations -

a desensinn of rearols for hre prevention.

E he following teduucalissues are discuued; llLPA fdten; DOP iesteg of ILLPA Idten; Olove boa desig1; Plutmlum, handleg nf, Nep.,niwn, handhng of.

IJtP-9431 1UtaA GAMMA RAY, INC, Ducist Na 3412319CvP (ASlJ1P No. M6tl.03CvP) (LA 89-223) (Matenal lkanse No. 35-17171 41); ENDRCEMINT; August 29,1990, NOTICE OF llEARING AND OlllER MA1T125 UIP M32 RDRIDA 30WER AND IJOlfi COMPANY (Turkey Ptant Nucisar Omarating Plant, Umis 3 and 4), Docket Nos. 542SOLA 5, S251 OLA5 (AstJtP Na M602 01 OLA 5) (Technical Specince-tims Replacemen)(Faciltty Operatins ikense Nos. DPR41, DPR 4th OIT.RATINO lJCENSE Ah0Wi>

MINT; Seysember 25, lWO; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Cmauleratum of Punaible Su Sponte is-sues)

A

%e Ikmsing Board decided that it has the authonty to declare a sua spmte issue even after the buervenor ha. been dismissed as a pany. Ilowever, it decided to refer its emcerna to the Advisory Committes on Rosetor Safeguanis and to dismiss this case because the smunds for a sua sponte issue do ant saist.

B tf a Licensing Board, in the course of its duties, discovers an impanant safety or environmemal issue,it naist declare a sua sponte issue, pursuant to 10 C F112.760s, whether or om there are prues interested in that issus ce remaining in the case. De sua spmte authurtty is en added protection for the gubhc interest that the llaard sacrcises on tu own authority C

he followtng ted nicalissues are dancussed; Sundant Techrucal SpeciAcations, Change in Mode Reduction Requirernent, Technical Specs 6 cations; Boratim, Loss of AMhty to Reduce Modes; less d Coolant loop; Allowed Nuge Tims; Errom in No Sigruncant llazards Rapon, $sgmAcance of.

LDP-9433 CURATOR $ OF Tl!E UNIVIR$!TY OF MISSOURI, Docket Nos. 7400270,3402278-MIA (AStJIP Na 94613-02 MLA) (RE: TRUMP-3 Pmject) (Byproduct thenas No. 24M13 32, Special Nuclear Materiata Lkenne No. SNM 247); MA1T. RIALS UCfNSE AMENDMFNT; October 3,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Intervanors' Renswed Matum for Completue of fleerms File and Relatel Mauers)

A hs Presidmg Ofneer granted a portion of lmervenors' ownion to add additual doctanents to the hearing seconL he Suff responsibihty to add tie documents was contingere on truerweiers certifying that they do not already have them. Appropnate judgmass were onde to the 61ing sdeA Is in hght of this Onter.

B When the case penains to emendnumu to e special matenals license ano bypinduct bcense, it is not necessary (in the shamco of special evklence establishing a link) for the Staff to include in the hearing fue documents salated to anosher license that Applicars has to operate a research reactor at the same sa. Nor la it necessary, under 10 C FA 4 2,1231(b) to include in the heanns record repons that were ont submined by the Applicant or preparmd by the Suff - even though those serona might be televant to the case.

C Material need act be added to the hsaring Ele if a pany already has gained eccess to it. Itaving access, the party can use the materialin its case and the pmcerdmg need not be delayed for a meaningless procedural step to be takest D

Parties enay inchade in their wiiuen filmgs evidence that la not included in the hearing Ale.

E he Suff is wged to canplete a heanns Ele that is orderly and simple to use, thus saving the presidmg efficer sad the partna the triplicated effout of sorting the Ale far themselves. Iloweve, when a aiotion directed at the lac.k of order was served after weeka had paued,it was fowid that there was no schel appropriate in this case.

ISP-9434 CUR 410RS OF TllE UNIVERSTTY OF MISSOURL Docket Nos. 740lm0,3402278 MLA (ASlJIP Na 94613-02 MLA) (RE: TRUMP-S Project) (Bypeduct 1kense Na 24Ml3-32, special Nuclear Materials IJcense Na $NM-247); MATERIAL 3 IJCENSE AMENDMFNT; October 15, W90; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motion for Order Concerning Documents) 22

i I

DIGl'.STS IS$UANCl3 OF TilF ATOMIC EARTY AND LICl:NSING BOARDS A

Intervenois' ouguest is for an Onier that the Suff and lkenom "noufy the prues aad the INesidmg Officer d any new informailon vluch is mievant and matenal to the mauen bang adjudicated" is derned.

Does perties have that obbastion and no order need isan B

Pursuant to 10 Cf.R. I 2.1731(c) the Siaff has:

• e smumang duty to keep the heanns fila up to data,, in the way the hearmg 6te was mada sveilable trutially

• C 1.Acensee must emform to the McGuus rule, whwh reqmres that relevant materials continue to be served in hcenamg cases so that the facts will come to bear m the htigatm D

De test of relevance and matenahiy for a document la ma befors it is analyrce if a pany thmke it necessary to analyte s &amas further to determine ita significance to the case, then the document has met the test of selevance and matmahty and should be acrved in the case pursuant to the M,:Ouire sule.

IEP-90 35 CURA 1DR3 OF Tile UNIVFR5fiY OF MIS $0URI, Dxket Nos. M00770. 3402278-M1A (ASIEP No. 94613 02 MLA) (RE: TRUMP S I%)ect) (Bypoduct lkenas Na 24 40511 32, Special Nuclear Matenala IAense Na SNM 247); MATERIALS LICLNSE AMINDMihTl Odober 20,1990, MINORANDUM AND ORDLR (Grant of Tasapwary Suy)

A ne Presiding Offner, in this Subpart L proceruhng, granted a temporary suy of esponments bems conducted by the lleenses with smericium, neptunium, and pluumiura, lie fand that Intervenors were hkaly to succeed a the ments of a vancty of allegations,includmg: failure to ernonstrate cornpliance with requirerreuss for emersmey planning or an alw.rustin evaluaum of puenual radiation esposures, failure to fully ennwre the redonuchdas being wwie:I with (including comammates), the adequacy of Ill.PA Khers that have net been dor tested, and the competence of penannel B

knce the beense cours the use of 25 curus of amencium, it is subject to the emergency planning or evaluathm caquiremens of 10 CF.R. (( M32(iXI) sad 30.72. hose sectinns,in 5<hedule C esempt fmn their pitwisions only the use of two or fewer cunes of americiunt llence, the bcense is not anernet.

C section M22(a)(4) of 10 Cf.R. sequires that an apptwauon for a keenas include the twme, amount, and speci6 cat 4ons (includes the chanical and physical form and, where apphcable, isotopc content) c( the special nuclear material Regulatory Guide 103 auggesu that the a,. counting irm:lude sigmacara contaminama, la this instance,ikmace accoused for Pw239 and P+2% which are known to be a-..,

' by P+241, wt.one cune cmtent may encued that of the iactcyca that are accm;ued fw.

his is an apparent violation of Corinniasion segulatisma, D

Industry standards require that all llISA 6hers be DOP tesied in place fran tune to time. No cmht can be claimed for Ehers not propculy tested E

Without dernanstraung that a llEPA Sher would survive a fire nr explanum, no caedst may be takm for such a 61ur with respect *e a radiacon seleue acasaria F

The Presi&ng OtTicer granted a tempority stay in respones to a motion for a auy and a provsma rnation for a temporary atsy. lie found tha, the suy entana were met, granted a ternporary auy, and presided for en andy haanna to dissolve the stay.10 CF.R. Il 2,12td and 2.788.

O he following technicalissues are discusat: Flutmiurn isotopes; Cune sonient of special nuclear materials; 1(EPA F1hes, DOP lesung: Release of unencapsulated re&amchdes; !!margency planning for special nuclear inatorials.

LDP 9436 KT, MARY MEDICAL. CFRTER-ilOIIART and ST, MARY h0' DICAL CINIT.R-CARY.

Dodet Nas, 03431379-OM, 03041615 OM (AS12P No, 946124t-OM) (EA 1:o. 94071) (Onler Suspentma Bmhytterapy Activities and Mo&fying Lleense); MODlMCAllON OF 11 CENSE; Octoter 31,1990: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Motim to Sinks Cerma Dements)

A De IJcensing Board denias a avaica to strika catsin documents simu the recond of the poceed.ns.

B Parties in C-pmceedess how an oblissuen to alat sJptwatory bodies nasalms informatice of which they becerne aware bearing upon a maner bang a4 dwated. Duke Power Ca (William B. McGuire Nuclear Stathm, Units I and 2), A1AB.143,6 AEC 623,625-26 (1973); Temesses

%11ey Authority 01: owns Ferry Nuclear Piers, Umta 1,2, and 3), A1AB 677,15 NRC 1387,1358,1394 (19821 C

Docunwras provided by a party to a Llocnsing Board dunns an djudicatcey pinceahng repvarnt publicly available agmcy records and, absent a pnar anang by a party to bmit their pibbc avadabihty (for example, as powided by the procedures and standards spelled cza in 10 Cf.R. 62.790), the documans wdl ma be stricken from the secord of the proceeding.

33

l DK;ESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile A10%dC 6 AFETY AND 1,1 CENSING BOARDS WIP 9037 COMMONWEAL,D1 EDISON COMPANY, as al. (Canou Caumy Nuclear Staten Units 1 and 2), Ibcist Nos 54599-E5R, 54604LSR (ASUIP Na 79422 01 LS), CONSTRtKTION Pl RMIT

%TTilDRAWA14 Octaba 31,19% ORDER APPROVING WTillDRAWAl, AND TLkMINATING PROCEEDING A

De Ikensing Board grama en unoppusalpunt m<maan to withdrew an a;t eatim for a cmatructwn h

permit for a nuctaar gewer facihty aint termmates the prasemimg-IEP.90 38 CURA 1DR3 Ol' Tile UNIVI'R1 TTY OF M13SOURI, Dodet Na 7000270,3402278 MLA (ASIEP No. 94613 02.MLA) (RE: TRUMP 5 Project) (Bypoduct Usense No. 244051132, Special Nuclear Materials Ucense Na SNM 247); MATTRIAL5 UCENSE AMENDMENh November 1,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Skensee's Pernal Response Concermns Ternporary Suy)

A After vocaving Ikensee's asponse to his ordar grantang e iarporary stay, da Presidma Othcer draermuwe that many of tw fedmes that the stay was based m are no kmger valut lleen, he issues favorable fuufmse concermns the behhood eat Ucensee wia exceed en the following issuce: (1) that es amount d MIPu hat h pesasses is less thri 2 cunes,(2) that ha amergency plan is adequate to cmcr the DtUMP 3 activitwo in the Alphs taborswy and that the Columtma Fire thvertment would 6ght e 6:e at dw laboratory, and (3) that dw Ucenseu has not comnuued any arrers that cast doubt an the c<surcsence of its pers<auwt WPu that it is B

ne Pnsiding Of5cer also rules that Ucaines should have rcponal om smous of beermed to posseus as e substantial contaminars, ils ausharises the $taff of the CanmWsion to issue an amendmera covenna the amount of MIPu that Ucenses may possess.

C Sirce Usenses has not respeded to all the siemana o t led to the grantang of the temporary stay, the stay is left in effect.

D ne pwonet of a temporary stay a stay may not ap y to tie opponan's response.10 C.F.R.

p 5 2.78t(d) (apphcable by irtference to 10 C.P.R. 5 2.788(i)).

E Secten 70.22(a)(4) of 10 CfJL and Regulatory Ouide 10.3 require that an art cant far a special h

nuclear materials bconse disclose the presence in hs hcensed amount of pluioniurn of 1.21 cunes of NIPu.

wtsch is a beta enduet wah abran 1150 the alative inological effecuveness of ee same amount of curies seemed by an algte satuner.

F It is asynaviate L4 a Ere department to have a procedure in whieb 6esaghiere may cesse Eghting a are who redsstim levels reeds dangerous levels. %is is sanilar to procethares when great heat or amde cause Erenghters to cease 6ghung a $se from a threatened location.

O The following technical issure an discussed. Relauve Biological Effectivenssa; WPu sa a cataminara in special reaclear materials; Ernergency planning whh aspmi to special nuclear materials.

ISP 9439 CLEVELAND 1154TRIC ll111MNATING COMPANY, a at (f%rry Nuclear Power Plam, Umt 1). Ibcket Na $4440lA 2 (AstSP No. 94605 024LA); OPERA 11NG UCENSE AMENVMWT; Nuwmher I,1990; INTI1AL DECl310N (Appimng Lkwwe Amendmet)

A Staff issued a heense amendment that permits Ikannes, rather than Staff, to ses cycle-specine parameter lunha for the operatim of die sector, pavided that Ikermee anplays Staff-s[Tveval method-ology. As a sesuh, no gpretunity frr a headng on the cycle.spectEs pararnaer hmits will be offered.

Fellowing a supulauon of fact agreed to by the panies which pamJed that the heeres emmdrnes issued to Ucemse does nne permit the Ikenses to caercise discicuan, the Ucensing Bosal concluded that the harme amendman will not irrysoporty depnve irsarwner of hearms righsa snaranteed by (189: of the Ascanie Energy Act ISP M 40 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSl(IRF, es at (Seatecok Statim, Unita 1 and 2),

Doriet Ncs. 544434tR 3,54444 0LR.3 (AS12P Na 9461S03 0lA3)(O(Taue Emerserwy Plannms);

OPERA 11NO UCENSE REMAND; November 7,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Denying lkensee's Mouan for Summary thaposition of lasues Rananded in A1AB-937)

LDP 9441 CURA 1DRS OF Tl!E UNIVERSTTY OF M1350URf, Docket Nes. 7400270,3402273 MI.A (A312P No. 90613-02.MLA) (RE: TRUMP-3 Project)(Dypoduct Ucense No. 24 00513 32, special Nuclear Maianals Ucerue Na SNM 2471 MATTRIAL5 UCENSE AMENDMENT; Novanber 16,199&,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (!)asolunisi af Stay) 24 1

DIGESTS ISSUANCl's OF Tile ATOMIC SAWTY AND (JCENSING BOARDS A

After soviewmg the criteria for a temporary stay in baht of Ucesee's last responsive Ehng. the presadtng ofLcer desides ht the criteria for the stay that had been granted sto no longer met and that the stay should be Efted.

Il It is oppgnate to grant a terwarary stay on the appheade of a forty that shows that the catena for a terrmorary stay are nea. Aher the bcases fde a respmse ht demmstrates that the ternporary stay enteria are not met, it is then appupriate to hft d.s tanporary stay.

C The f allowing tatnical issues are discussed: IlEPA 6hra6on, DOP tcenng of ILEPA (dten, Single-failure cruenan, for ska bones; Olove bones; Prevetum of plutanum fire; Phnoruum (unencapu-lated), rehase freedms for. Reluse fructum, plutuosum (unmesprulated).

WIP-9442 W13A GAMMA RAY lNC., Dodet No. 3412119CvP (A$lEP No 94614 03-CivP)(Maien-als Ucense Na 351717841)(EA 49-223); IATORCEMIAT ACrlON, October 29,1990, PREllEARINO CONIT.RENCE MDIORANDUM AND ORDEk IEP-9443 WIAA GAMMA RAY. INC.,Ibdu No. Sl2319 CivP (ASIEP No. 946184XavP) (Mate-rials llams No.35-1717:41) 7.A 39-223); ENIORCEM1AT ACllON, Novunber 15,1990; MEMO-RANDUM AND ORDIR (Manoruhnna Preheanna Cmferece)

LEP 9444 PUBLIC SERYlCE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSILIRE, a al. (SealexA 5taim, Urdts 1 and 2), Docka N<e. 5440-OleR,54444CleR (A5LEP No. 94604010LeR) (Enwesency Pianning, A13 Patients); OPERATINO UCENSE REMAND; Daanher 18, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDi;R (Summary Disposition Makm)

A The thansing Board demissed, in mpmse to a motion for Summary Dwpos, don, an issue sananded to it by the Ameal Boani cecerning the supected tune d evacuataan for advanced hfe support patacnts. The Beerd Jecided ht then la no prpose far which an ETE for A13 patieras is awhcable and that truervenas failed to deamstrate the saistence of a genuine issue of fact concerning whether adequate est: mates of the E1E had been made.

B Tbers is no putoss for wiuch an ETE for Al3 pauents is awhcahie. Decisums abet the evacuaden of udt A13 pedas will be made by the aamimg medical personnel based m enedical considorations spait fnsn an estimate of how leg it sculd taka to evacuate the tan ALS paan.

C The Bosni Miwd the facton.'avonna and egosing ths grsnung of monons far summary dispositian.

IEP-9445 CURA 1DRS OF 11tE UNIVUts!TY OF MISSOURI, Docket Nos. 7400270,402274 M1A

+

(AstEP No. 94613 02 MLA) (RE: 11tUMFS Project)(Bypoduct Demu No. 24-00513-32; Special Nuclear Mawsiala Ucense No. SNM 247); MATERIALS UCFNSE AMENDMINT; December 19, ' r.

MDIORANDUM AND ORDER @ending Maims, techuhng 1htue Related to Pontesman of 3'IPu)

A 1he Presidmg Of5cer in this psoceeding determined that Ucenses did not need to disdose the cune ccruent ofWPu andEsmeridum in its special melaar material because they coraributed only a small peptation of the taal biological dass, canpared to 239Pu and ePu, and wr, not signi6 cars contaminants.

2 This daarmination was related to a tuling bl Ucensee is not cmered by regulations, effective after its boense was granted, sequinna ht there be either an emergency plan or an evaluation of offsite dose in a possihie emersency if the cune contas of special astrar maienal stuals et saceeda 2 curias.

B In Subpaa L proceedings, as in for mal proceedman, showmg that a license appbcaacn has a defect does not danestrate that the apprcruista relief is denial of the transe. Rebet is governed by 10 Cf.R.

6 2.1233(c), which says "the initial wtmen presentation of a pany ht reqtented a hearms or pattinned for lesve to muervens must,,, describe in detail what inlief in sought wah respa:t to each deactmey or unisskm (Emphasis added.)

C la attagting to drmestrate the valihty elits beense, a heensee is not restrided to the content of ha am cation. h may introduce whatever evidaws it chnoses in rebuttal of truervmors' evidence.

u D

Intervans unust demonstrate that thers is a season for rehef to be requimL lt is then up to Ecmsee to dancestrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that scene lessa relief than bcense revocation is apptopriate.

E Ucmace need na cunply wuh the provis;ms of to Cf.R. il30.32(iXI),70.22(i)- raladng to whrsher or not emergerry plaming may be required for scene special nuclear matenals hcenses - because these sections became effective aher its application was aproved and because these secticos govern the emtem of applications.

25

DIGESTS (550 ANCl3 OF Till' ATOMIC S AITTY AND 1lCI'.NSING BOARl6 f

Cornpliance wtth 10 C.F.k ll 3035(c),70.25(c), deshes with financial r. _.. y for decun-nsasiurung. is eat germane to a bcense proceedmg since these secuans do not gmera the entment of ambcatima fm twenses bis impose ohhgauais em hcmams.

O Pursuant to the regulatanns and to regulawy gukiance, cmtsined in Regulaury Guide 10.3, heensee need only dischne signifwant canaminanta in an appbe Gon for a Part 70 bcese, Signincance is mmarily determined wuh sospect to the proporumste cetnbutim to d<ue. Ihwever, also rejavant may be the sincluts size of the due and whether a not the cune content of the contaminants affects the irnpunim of apphcahls regulatory proviskuss.

11 he following nothnical issues are diactmsed: Dickscal effectiveness.241Pu, Plutaruum isotopes in special nuclest maienal, Signi5 cant em'aminant (Regulaury Ouide 103).

LEPW46 ST. MARY MEDICAL CDM.R-IlOBART and ST. MARY hGl)lCAL CLhM.R-CARY, Docket Nos. 030 31379-OM, 0%016150M (ASIEP No. 94612 MOM) (EA No. MM1) (Order Suspending Brachytherapy Activines and Modfying LJcense); MotXI1 CATION OF IJCtW514 Daember 26,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORM.R (Onter Appmna Settisment Agmement)

A The IJcessing llosrd appewes a ornalernent egnement and terminates de proceeding subject to the terms of that agressnes B

A bcensing bonnre authmuy to appens the senlernas of shew cause pmceedings sieme (nzn 10 C.F.R. I 2.2tT3. which regaises that any such settkuners accord "dus weigls to tbs positam of the staff" as well as the "put,hc irusnst."

24 i

- - ' -A

DIGESTS ISSUANCF.S OF DIRECTokS' DECISIONS Di> 944 PUBUC SERVICE (X)MPANY OF NEW llAMPSillRE, et el (Seabrook Statum, Units i and 2), Docket No. 54M3; REQUEST IOR ACTION; July 9,1990; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA i1206 A

N Darutor OfEco of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, derdes a Petitim fded by INincia Pien:e-Djmkkmd requesting denial of a heense to operne Seabrook Nuclea Sution. As grounaa for the request, the Podtimer had manated that nons of the safety insure raised in a July 11, 1989 leuer to the NRC's Advisory Comminee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) fran the Board of Selecunen of the Town of Lassa, Masanduseus,had been resolved. In denying the Petinon, the Duector found that, cetrary to the INsitimer's assertion, all of the allegations nised by the Petitimer had been addressed in the Final Envborunetal Sutament far the Seabrodt facihty, and in a menoran&un frcan the Staff to the ACR3 subcanminee.

B Evacuation decisions ses made by state and local governments, ra the NRC C

he foDowing tectencal issues am docusaed Release of radioedive materials in ef8uests to -

uruestricted amas; lessef<oolam accidenu; sclease of adansctive materials to grmndwater, emergency planning and evacuatim.

DD45 PUBUC SERVICl3 COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIURP, et at (Seabrook Station, Unit I), Dmket Na 54M3, REQUEST IOR ACTION; August 31,1990; DIRECTOR'S DFCISION UNDER 10 CF.R.

I 2.206 A

la en Ernergacy Monon 61sd boom the Canmission en behalf of New England Coelaior. on Nuclear 1%Dudon, Seconst AraLPhtiet league, and the Correnonweahh of Mamadmseus (Petitioners) in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatcry Carrunimion's (NRC's)licatama pecceeding for the Seabnxi Staden, Unit 1, Petitioners alleget the saistence of racers, previously undmelosed Industry repons of extensive and serious nguistory noncnnpliance at Seatsook. Pisinoners argued that these mataials (cenain reporta piepared by the Institute for Nuclear Powa Opersuons (!NPO)) danmatraal that the NRC had no vahd tedmical basis for Anding that Sabrook Statist Uma 1 of the Pubhc Service Canpany of New llampshire, et at (Demsee) cunphet with the NRC's ngulations and was safe to operate.

D De Monon was alerted to the Director cf the Ofhee of Nuclear Reactor Ragulatim (NRR) for pryration of a response punuant to 10 C.F.R. I 2.2th C

% Duector of NRR has aviewed the INPO repons nierad to by Pttitimes and has found the allegations not to be substantsanal %n INPO reports on which the snegations wcn founded do not indicate that the Sembrai facility is cut of emformance with NRC enquarness er that it is unsafe to operate.

%s Ucerisee's corrective attions were appropriate and responsive to the INPO andings. Ccatsequently, the Director of NRR determined that no action purmassa to section 1206 need be taken in this maner, DD46 CLEVELAND EIICTRIC IILUMINATING COMPANY. et al. (Perry Nucleu Power 1%nt, Unit 1), Dosist Na 54440; REQUEST FOR ACTION; Sepamber 25,1990; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA (2.206 A

The Duector of the OfHce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation dmies a paition 61ed by Ohio Chizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. (Petitioners), that requested the Nuclear Rydatory Commission (NRC) orda the shutdown of the Persy Nuclear Powa Plant, Urut 1 (Perry) and issue a Notice of Violatim and impose a civil paahy on Clevelaral Elecuic illuminating Canpany (ucensen). De petition alleged that the beensee had operatal in violation af its Technical Specincanons since Nomnber 1939. ki denying the rapest, the Duersor found that the Ucenses had not operated Perry in a matner cetrary to that permined by its operating beense.

27

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' IWCISIONS B

We followse technical issue is discuned: l'anntial Service Waur Systen DD 904 _ ARIZONA pUBUC SERVICE COMPANY, et at (hlo Verde Nuclear Genersting $iation Units 1,2, and 3), ikdat Nas.56528,54529, R530; REQUEST FOR AC!10N; 0%cr 31, te90; PAK!1Al.

IXRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 41206 A

In a Petition dated May 22,1990, and Eled with ow U,$. Nuciar Regulatory Cmunisesan (NRC),

Ma, Unda E. Mitchell(Wenoner) mquested that the NRC take se.ims punuant to 10 C.F.R. (1206 wub respect to the Pelo Venie Nuclear Ocneranng Suuon (PYNO3) of the Artres Pubts $cryice Canpany, et at (APS or Ucenseel B

no Petitioner stated that she is anplo3ed by the Ucerwee as an assocists electrical engineer at the PYNOS. She alleged that serious violanms nisted at PVNOS in the oysienu for emergency hahung and fire potection which wen uncovend by the NRC d. sing punino inspections, and that Uoenses persennel acted improperly to " water dan

• the inspectaas faruhnga, suppress other acnaus vk!stinns, and dinereda an NRC inspectar. In addinan, the Ntimer alleged est NRC Regkm V managemers retaliusd against the NRC inspectw in quesnan and agmod to

• water dawn" inspecsimi report Andms: as a resuh of the effons made by the Umnaes. Pttinoner claimed that thces actions would chlD offaru by NRC inspecors and employees of NRC licensed facihnes to raise safety concerns.

C The ausgaties in the Putinen tsD tres three catogaries. Fird, the Petition aDegas impropriaies

. by NRC peruannel neanhng NRC inspection activities. His mauer has beat nferred to the Omco of the inspector Omerst Second, the Petaion alleges that sarima safssy violations exist at PVNOS. At this time, the Director of the Of5ee of Nuclear Ructor Regulauan (NRR) has decided as issue a Partaal Direcim's Decision deshna with these safety allegations he last sstegory of skestians involves alleged imprcyneues by APS personnel which have been refered to the NRC's Of6cs of Investigenons (01) Upon recaupt of the Of Report, the Direciar of NRR win issus a Fmal Duettar's Decision in this metter.

D.

In his Panial Dueciar's Decision, the Duester of NRR concluded that NRC inspecnm acuvities

. had idereiAed deAciencies and violanans regardma the As protection program at PVNOS.Ds Ucensee has a41sessed thans donciencus with an accepable plan fw conective actions. Curnctive actions addressing

- insnediate cmcerns have been congleted. NRC inspection aa!! la monitoring the remaining cursuctive q

acticas to ensue tirnaly complecos. Consequently, the Director of NRR deermined sat no action pursuant i

no section 2,206 need be taken at this time. -

a E

. The Director of NRR taites in his Decisim est the NRC 5taff has issued a Nonce of Vicianon and Fivposed knpmitice of Ovil Penahy to APS in the am, net of $125,000 for violanans of NRC requiremeras in the Are prossaian ama,in paa to ernr asize the oesd forlasting runnsEat action. --

e DD-908. LONO 151AND WOIIUNO COMPANY (shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit I), Docket No.

%322; REQUEST IOR AC110N; Decanhar 20,1990; DIRECTOR'S DFCISION UNDER 10 C.F.R.

41206.--

. A.

. ~ In this Duecam'e Decisi:n, the Diesciar of the Of6ce of Nuclast Reactor Regulation has nspondel.

to Petitions 61sd on behalf af the shmeham-Wading River Central School Distnet (School District), Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy, lac. (SE2), and the Las laimid Association, aquesting that cenain actions be takan with regard to Shmuharn Nuclear ibwer Station, Unit 1. he actions mpassial by the School District and SE2 hicluded, among others, issusace of an immediaiety effecuve order to the las taland

' Usteing Campany (Ulf0) to ceses and desm ficm activities slated to the dduehng and destaffmg of the facility and seinra ao the " status quo anu," civ;l penatnes against the licenses, defeeral of consideration of ULCO's repass to reduce its onsits propaty insurance until after publication d a Fmal E,,,-L

-.al knpaa Statement, and namedial action plana. De School Dutrict and SE2 alleged that adt actions wen i

- necessary no avoid potentiany hasasdous conditions adsing frcen ur. reviewed safety questima, wirdations of 0

the Uceness's f40.pomer operating license, and unnviewed..

questions. hey funhet alleged

$st Ulf0 is undonaldag a course et action that will willfully avoid the fun and effective Carnmission consi,tmetion of the envirmanental cmsequences of Ocensee action and is cors ary to the provisions of the Policy Act (NEPA), the Council en Envirmmental Quahty (CEQ) Ouidelines, and National E,-a - --'

' t>e Comnussian's regulations by preenti:a for regulatory review defueling and destaf5ng plass that are

. the totit;al actions in a single course of action to transfer the license far Shoreham and to decemnussion the plant. De long taland Associatitut Petitim requened $at the Commission order the suspension d Ulf0*a actions bs fathersna of a "mininaan poshue cadaian* st Shonham, sadenake an bivestigade into s

y i<

i 23 c

4 i

i t

t 4

1 v-

.a v

, = ~. -

=w-

.e

.a---.,

m

-m-y y-

-yp

DIGESTS 1%$0ANCl3 OF IHkFCTORS' DECISIONS whether imse violations have necuned, kutiais an envinernental review of the plarmed dannmissunung d T.t.=$ra and devise a process to cmsider Shc eham issues. As gimnds for these ratunts, the Peudon st!ssed the 111f0 has tahm edi a in to taonnsiment wuh the penuses underlying tu heatse and that are timed at the ulumste Ahng of a documnussusung applu;auen. Ni h - =ns ses forth in the Doessat, with the sacepim of the is.ues raised in a supplemers Bled Novernher 19,1990, to h &ehaus insu;a a:ut SE2 Ptanuma, the Directru has denied the Peuuma. The issues raised in the Nmember 29.1990 supplomat wal be considered in a agarats Duettar's Decision.

B

%e Cawnission's ngulatias in 10 CIA Part $1, which bnplemera satum 102(2) d NEPA, aquire that each applics.s for a hcensa ammidment autheruing the decanmusiomng of a facdity sutunit a sugimuss in hs environmental wport and that, kt connectum wuh the ameruiment of an olesung beerma to authorue the demunusiming of sudi e f acihty, the NRC Su!! will prcpero a supplanental env'inmmersal impact staternas or enthorvncesal assessment. Iloweva, there is no requimne:S that an environmental soview of d-,.

.W.g be undataim pior to the suhrnitial of an apphcatiat for the decunmiasmrung of a facihty.

C NEPA seguires au feilent agmenes to censider,in amnecuan with pmposals far every major fcdent actim signi6cantly affecung the envuwunent, seasonable alternsLives to the gegweef acuoit ilowever, the NRC bas determinal that the NRC need art addrum resumed eperana of a facd.sy as an stiernative in its NEPA analytu cf the request for appemal of activiues associ ml wuh decomnussioning D

Absan highly unusual cuvurnstanns, the NRC laJ e aethinity to duecs a bcessee in ryersie a hcausd facihty 11 livery beenace is obligated to canply whh the terms and cmdnims of its bsense and the sequienents of the NRC's segelstunt No private ag=emas can reheve a hca ses of thu respmsibshty, and a licence may not enrarset away ha obbgsti<ns as a hcarises.

F The purpose of the insurance requiranent set forth in 10 Cf.R. I 50.54(w)is to assuse the fmancial aba~lity d a heenses to estabhsh and mamtain a stable eundiuon for a Sullear p0Wer plart (Qllowmg an acddent, including namesary decornaminatirm, and thereby proums the pubhc heahh and safety. "this, the amount ofinsurance emwage called for is met drivat by ths value of the facany, int rather by the psauial cost af estabhahing and mairnaming a safe, statue cruslaion followmg an accklas which, in turn, is a function d the potetial accidents to which a faciluy might to suyoct and the cnnsalucnt radiological hasanL 0

h is mly activiues associaial wah sanmal of a facihty fann service and aduction of residual sadioactivhy to which the decamnusauning pan:ess aghee; the insunnoe requirarent in 10 CJA 4 50,54(w) is not a necessary einrners of decommasaionmg which has a wholly independera Anancial aquiremett.

11 The (cDowing tedmical issues are dummsed. Defushes and spent fuel pont storage of fuel, Maunenance mai surveillance of inoperatie aguireners; suffing of facaty ht defueled (oruhtion; Unresolved safety quessma.

29

DIGESTS ISSUANCl3 OF DENIALS OF Pl"ITTIONS IDR RULDtAKINO DPRM 941 Cft12 ENS TASK TORCl! OF CllAPELlull, et al., thket Nos. PRM $431. f%i 5045, PRM 50-46; February 13,1990, DENIAL OF plt. f!10N IOR RULEMAKINO A

De Nuclear Replatory Commisakm is denymg thne retinons fm rulansking cmccraing emer.

gency preparedness at nuclear parer p!arsa. he.es pessions wem sutniued by the Citims Taak Ivece d Chapel Ifdl, Nonh Carolina; the Departmera d Auerney Oawral, staie of Mame; and an inevidual, Kenneth 0. semim,1%D. De Citizens Tsak fiste petinon (PRM 5431) inquested that (1) the emergmey planning sue se lius around am: lear poww planu be eatended fan 10 nules to 20 ndles, Q) Independent rs&ologicol arm taring systans operaiad by local ennmuniues be enabhahed, and (3) mandsinry utihty fun &ng d dw a nergency preparedness effona of local comnnauttes be required De peu6an sutzntued by Mr. Scau, PRM 5045) requested that the sin of me plume esposua pathway FEZ be determined on s siis specife 5atir using the omst up-to dae authodologes and that the size of the EPZ be reevaluated at least every J yeata. De petitica submiusd by the State of Maine (PRM 5446) requened (1) sapanaim of the emergency plaming sons for bcah the plums esposwo pathway and the ingestion pathaty, (2) a sequinnent that emergency planning be dme before any construcuan of a nuclear facihty is permined and that the governor a governon of any affected state approve the emersmey plans as a precon& tion to couructhm; and (3) a requirement that offsite emersecy prepandness (mdings be made befors any fuel loedmg er low-power operadma eri permined.

D The Certinsion ecsuidas that these thne petithms have a cornmon theme, thus warranung

,a simuhaneous evaluasim. Addaionally, the State of Mame formauy requested that "the Mame Petition be cmso6tated with the a& called Sexton Petition.. ? In denying me paitims, the Cannussim secludes that its present regulanons en emergery pnparedness are adepate to praect pubhc heshh and safety.

C The deposition of redmactivity on the ground due to rain scouring radasetin materials from the air ("nimout") was emedaad in NURFA0396 De stunners est the das.ge enirnates ht NUREG-Gl%

i assume a uniform rate of deposition of radmsetive materialis in erva. A M1 page (p.1-25) of NURFOO3%

is dewaad to a discussion of tainous effects. WWie NUREO 03% does am explicitly say so, the calculated deses presented in Figures I 10 through 115 do,in fact, include the effa:s of rainout D

&nphcit in the concert d "adapale psmactave measures

• is the fact that emergency planning will not eliminate, in every concaveble accidau, the prusiWhty of serious harm to the p2blic. Emergency planrung cat,howeva,be upected to reduce any public harm la the evas of a serima but highly unlihaly accidcas. The proper interptsation of the tule would cad for adjusanas to the stact size of the EPZ cn the basis of such straightforward administative considerations as avoieng boundaries that run through the middle of schools a hnipitals, er eat erWtraruy carve out ana!! portions of goverarnental juriasctions.

The goalis merely planning simp 1mity and avoidance of ambiguity as to the location of the boundaries.

Given these circunutances, me Canmission has cmcluded that adequate praiaction can be provided by an Ef'Z that is about 10 miles in radius.

P.

Den is no hne at 10 miles beyond which ra&ation cannot pass. Ilowever, the bazard frorn an accident tends to gradually decrease as one moves funher from the accidair. Ilow far fiom a nuclear power plara is the potersial harani small emugh that speciac detailed planning is am wonhwhQet in the Canuniasion's judgman, that distance is shout 10 miles for the considaations stated in this discussion.

F

. De Commission believes that if prutective actions were warramed beyond to miles, those actions, whether evacuatiau, ahchering, er relocation, would certainly be recorwnended to the state otlicials.

Nmethshe4, due to the addinmal time ihm is available for the taking cf protective actions out to greater 31 I

l DIGl:STS ISSUANCFS OF IWNIAls OF PETTilONS FOR RUll: MAKING distances from the rescier, de impicenranaum of thee adatamal paxcenve actions w=ld na raguire detailed plans.

O The 14 mile and $4 mils 17/s were chascu an a pianurg bens in demanstrate a capabih y and to prwide anergency plans with the ScalMhty d dahng with a bened range d accidus releases, rather than being based solely on a singis highly unhkely event, such as the musst casa h was reccgrazad that protective actima might need to be takm beyond thens plannin6 ame datances for the most severe releases 11 A releans magnitude similar to the one sesociated e,th Chernobyl and the psaiNhty that ad hoc actums beyond the planning zone l=amdaries might be needed for voy unhkaly eventa were considered and have becut factored bito the develqnra of U.S. requiremests, inclueng the sian of the EPZa. hs Oiernobyl accident and the Sories responw do not aval any appress cenciency in U.S. plans ans' prepre&iess,inclueng the 14 mile plwne sarcours pathway 174 sire and the $4mDe ingestion saposura pathway 172 sins. Dess runes pmvide an adequais basis to plan and carry out the fuu range of protecuve a.:tima for the poplatims widun thme sones, as well as beyond thern,if the highly br9rubsW nemi should erue I

the Cisnnussian agrees ihm the sta of ths 14 mile FYZ was desarmined using the metho44ies availaW in 1980 and that today there calst svue asylusticated technique and computer nulels to estimais enestion seleases and doses to the public. Nonetheless, the avut s$usncated and upio-dats methodologies were used in the devolupmera of NURfGil50 (Fchruary 1987) whidi dnes sus pnwide evidece that the sin of the plurns esposure pathway EIZ ahould now be increased. Drah NUREG-llSO (February 1987) pewideo insights emeermna (1) the way otYalte doeos wmid be espected to vary wuh dutance from the plaras analrced and (2) the relanve effectiveness of different offsits panecuve actims si various distances.

}

The Counmission determuwd, based on infamauon svaasW m the time ibat it por-adgated the einersency planning regulatums, that a plume capceure pathway emergency plansms tone (plums ITZ) of abat 10 miles in radius was the proper and appnyriate area for deuiled planmns for protectiw scuans in the cent of a radiciogical emergercy. At that brns, the Catumaman specWally recogmaed that detaiksi planning in that ums would more waddy permit the developnut and impleensraation d ad hoc actions beyond the 14smle plume FYZ should the need adas. See NUREG 0386," Planning Bewis for the

- Develcpmera d State and Local Governmmt Radiological Emergency Response Plana in Suppat of Ught Water Nuclear Power Plaisa" (Decernher 1978), NUREGM54,*Cnien4 for Prepretim and Evaluance of Radiological Fmergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nudear Ibwer ihnu" (Nemmber 1980), et 12, laws Island Ughting Ca (Shonaan Nudear Fower Suuan, Unit 1), CU-5712,76 NRC 343,39093 (1987); Smthern Cahfarna IWisaon Ca (San Ondre f4udear Gmerating Stanon, Umta 2 and 3), LBP42-39,13 NRC 1163,187173 (1942). In enact, the Camintma aweussed for the possibihty of spontanseus evicuatira eutsik e phune FIZ oben in estabhshed the sias of that EPZ in the 6ist insunca The petishes provids no haunestim for espanston of the plume EPZ to further aceaunt for the punihdily of sponsannous avamations, Eag erman espebihty la aanunuauy cheded by NRC and FF.MA. Tbs Corremssum does an: behevo K

t that there is a ladt of sumitoring equipmans and therefore does nra ses isch of equipmers as a reason to annend its re gulatima to rapire that marvtoring apipmas be given to and creraind by local communiums.

L Off, die sumi:oring is not insanded and connes be used peperly by itself to make inaial da:iasma ce peascrive netwns. Elevaiad ri&ation levels c(f site are sms the very last indicators et an serious acddess armt seul to caur at a time when pmtective acten decimons should abondy have been stada.

M fundas arrangemenia are essendauy a mauer of suis and trcal goverane interest; therefore, dw Cernmissism inda no factual tesis to conclude that the pryosed fundusg is necessary to enaW suis or local gevestmisa to esubhah adequate emergency peteredness plans. Accenknaly, we do not rudt the questirm of cur !sgal authority to rapire liunsee funding in the manner reu{uested by the Petaioner.

N

%* rnwisums of to C.F.R. (52.79(d) pwide that to the maninum fusible eatent emergency pleas will be amoval by the NRC before it ismes the construcnon permit for a new nuclear power plars.

O The fotbring technicalinaw La discussed: Emersency Planmog.

DPRM 942 SIERRA CLUB, Dudet No. PRM 423; June I,1990, DE"NIAL OF PLTTTION IVR RUIL MAKNO A

he Nuch ar Regulaiany Cornaussion (NRC) is dmying a peuuan fw rulemaking (PRM 423) suknined by the Sierra Chib. hs Petitimer submitted an amadment to their pentum wiuch is also being 32

u~.

-~ -

, -,. --- ~.. ~. ~ ~ -

.-w

. - - ~.. -- --

k f

DIGESTS isSUANCl3 0F DENIA13 OF PEllTIONS SUR ltti.5: MAKING.

dmied. De original pention requested that the NRC amend he requistims pertaining to uranium mill talhnss sites to require an NRC bcense for the pannession of amterial being cleaned up mder TWe I of the Uranium M.D Tdiny Ra& stim Corvrol Act (UhtfRCA). De NRC bebeves that Psutioner's prgwsal is inconsistent with both the liners and the speciAc sequuwnmus of Tide I of Uhfl%CA In,,a amaximera to tu original pution, en Pentiener requested that if lu ortsinal pentim is dmial, that NRC misure that the mansperness of the material at, or derived frven, buctive shes be conducted in a manner that pnata the phiie heahh and safety and the envk - Prim to Depastment of Energy (DOE) cleanup at these slims,

' NRC is net authorized by efihse UhtfRCA or the Atanic Energy Act (AEA)is perfram such managenes oversight. UbfrRCA ha two very eatinct parts: Tide I for inactive siiss to be cleaned up by DOE with NRC cmcurrmes, and Tide 11 wbids covers sites bcensed by Se NRC, Alt, or Agwemera States as d

' January 1.1978, and au new sites. De Petitimer's proposal would, in esemce, require that the NRC ngulme Tide I sites in a simBar manner as Tide Il sitas. UhflRCA, howawr, ciserly datinguishes the authorities and neponnbilities of federal samcies in regulating Tide I sad Tide !! sites.

B

- UhtfRCA ha two very distinct pens: TW l fw inactin suas to be cleaned up by DOE and Tide 11 whidi emers snes licensed as of Jamary 1,197h and au new shes. Even thoush the material unde the TW I pngrwe may be dismically and physicauy similar to material under the Tide D program UMTRCA makes a wrv clear diannetion la how this ensierial is to be sontrabad and ngulated.

-C Thle I af 'UMrkCA pavides the NRC mly a review and canarvena tale in nrne&al actims.

Managemers of ths assidual sedioscian maurial prior to and during remedial actiens is the respmai y of DOEL ljoerving and smoornitant regulation by tie NRC occura mly after complaim of the rameaul action.

D Under Thle I of UnfTRCA, *vicinny properues" as to be revnediated by DOE under the Rio I pograrm As with the disposal sites.NRC's mis hu been clesdy dsAned in UMIRCA as ans of concurna:e and corwuhation..

,E By means of clearly stipulated ses-

' H UMTRCA Tkle I estabhahed auchanums in the i

performanos of the remedial west, emarucuan and performance marutering, and perpciual cumady and sirveillance under NRC heenas, which au cerenhute to the snain goal of penicesim of the pbhc heahh, safety, and the envtrerenant. De added segulatory methanism of disect Isrerwing pnar to 6aal cleanup

+

-- would act enhance this mam goal; vaiher h wouW delay the campleuen of amahal actim, boosues of the y

added seninistrative busden essociated with the formal hcenang process.

F De esclusten of TW I shes in 10 C.F.R. Pan 40 wu spaiAcaDy added to cosupiy with UMTRCA earing the actin remedia).sction phne.

O'.

Thie I mus are not covered by thees reguladens for the fonowing reases: (1) Unless specincany ausharized by the Congress, DOE is not subject to NRC regulation; (2) TW I speciAcaDy requires an

'.NRC license after cernplecim of remedial sedans to cover the leg. term care of these sites; Q) Congress

!r speciAcaDy yve NRC mly a soview and canamence sole far DOE aites specined in 'nds 10nsaive sites)

Anns the amedial.acdon phans of the psogram.

11 NRC esascises evenight tiuough ha emcurence solo in DOE's nmedial program, NRC must eensw with DOE's eaapistian determination that the samedial action as any sus cornplies with EPA l-standsnis for inactive milung sties.

DPRM.943 -MARVIN LEWIS, Docket Na PRM 5452; July'17,1990; DENIAL OF PETfl10N IOR RU12MAKINO -

, - he Nuclass Regulatory

_ 2 (NRC) is denying a petition f<r rulemaking (PRM 5452)

-A-2 from Mr. Marvin L Lewis. The petiden sequesu that the Comnussim amend its resutstions in 10 C.F.R.

Pens ; and 50 to seinstate Anancial tpaaliAcetiana u a conaderatian in the operating bcense hearmes for l

electric Os. De petition is being dermed becauen k raises no issues that== not previously cmaidered I-f in the ademaking pecess that nauhad in the -

='s aJordon on Septanhar 12,19H (49 Fed. Rag -

R 35,7d7) of a 6nal nde entidad "Flirnination of Review of Futancial Qualineations of Dectrie Utaities in b

. Opeseting IJeanse Review anni lleerings for Nuclear Pon Plants," and because no new cucumniances have arisen as wonent a change in the cwrent regulation. -

[.

B - -.

Rulanalting is an inappopriate peacess for deshng eith alleged Anarn:ial and other problems of Individuallicasees. -

t=

b l

i u.,

i I

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASl'S Carohna Power & Light Ca (shanson llams Nuclear Poww Plant), A1AB452,24 NRC 53% 546 (1984) sege of easrcise of enwrgency motifkation sysian; ALAB-941,32 NRC 347 0990)

Cinemnsd Osa and Electric Co (Willima IL 7mnmer N.aclear IWer Steuan, Unit 1). C11-82-20,16 htC 109, 110 (1982) crneria for adinissian se a sua spunta issue; LDPW32,32 NRC 183 0990) sua spmte adoption of issues that have already hem spot. lighted for consideration tiy suff; LEP-9424,32 NRC 18 (1990)

Cincinnad Oas and 13cetnc Ca (Willurn IL 7aminer Nuc!aar Power Suuen), ISP 812,13 NRC %

4441 (1981) standant for grant of summary duposiden mouans; IEP-90 44,32 NRC 437 (1990)

Ques of Suiesville v. AEC,441 F.2d 962,974 (1969) post-heaving review and revocation of hcenses far pmaicensing falhares; LEP 9426,32 NRC 37

. (1MO)

Oty of New Yeik v. U1 Dq=runet of Trinapatadon,715 F.2d 732,742-43 QA Cir 1983) range of thernatives to propued actim to be ceasidered. C1JM8,32 NRC 206 (1990)

Coveland Deo ie Inuninsung Ca (Pary Nuclear Powa Ptars, Unian I and 2), ALAB-443,6 NRC 741, 755 USTI) sunderd for grant of sunmary &apnsince; LEPM44,32 NRC 437 (19an)

Oeveland Dactne Bhaninatasg Co, (Pany Nuclear Power Plais, Usuu i and 2), Clju7,23 NRC 233, 235 0 986), aff'd sub ncan. Ohio v. NRC,814 F.2d 258 ((sh Or.1987) burdras em spmsors el renoming motion; AIAB-9% 32 NRC 82 stil 0990)

Oeveland Dactdc IUwninating Co. (Perry Nuclear l'uwer Ptara, Uniu I and 2), IEP 82114,16 NRC 1909, 191),13 0 982) aundard for summary desposaion; ISP-90 44,32 NRC 436 (1990)

Coahtion far the Environman, $L 1.ouis Region v. NRC,795 F.2d 168,172 (D.C. Cir 1986) niemaking peasas artied to financial qualiAcataans ads; DPRM-943,32 NRC 331 (1990) l Consolidated F4aun Co. of New Yast (Indian Point, Unita I,2, and 3), Cl.F75-8,2 NRC 173,176 (1975) sunderd far institutica nf show<suna poweedings; DD945,32 NRC 128 (1990); DD947,32 NRC 778 0990); DD948,32 NRC 4% (1990)

. Canumers Power Co. (Midland Plant, Umta 1 and 2), ALAB491,16 NRC 897,90rl (1982), sua sponte review declined,17 NRC 69 (1983) durnusal of appeal of intervenor far failure to participate before the hcenams bnenf); ALAB-934,32 NRC 4 (1990) thka Pouw Co. (Catawba Nuclear Station Unita 1 and 2), AIAB 687,16 NRC 460,448 0982), vacaiad in gutt en other smunds, CIJ-019,17 NRC INI 0983) improper uso et ducover to fkab out vague contenonr, ALAB-942,32 htC 427 0990)

Duka Powa Co. (Catswba Nuclear Sution, Uniu I and 2), CU.8319,17 NRC INI (1911) five factor test for admission of latelile! cantauims; ALAB-937,32 NRC 147 n48 (1990)

Duke Powa Co. (William B. McGuire Nuctsar Station, Uuits 1 and 2), AIAB-143,6 AEC 623,625-26 0973) sppucaNhty in informal renceahnp; ISPM34,32 h1C 255 0990) 35

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CAS13 luensee ohhgane to inIwm pmsiding officer and pernes of relevant and mawnal new infamanm; 1AP-9036,32 NRC 269 0990) l~ mal Rale on 1.snersary Planrdng, CU 8440,12 NRC 636,638 (1980) ressnn fw 5-in 14mue range for alerung system; ALAB-935,32 NRC 72 a55 0990) florida Nwer and Ught Co. (St imcw Nuclear Poww Nnt, Unas I and 2), C1189-21,30 NRC 325, 329 0 989) showing necessary to establuh standing to intervow in bcmse amendmera procee&ng; ISP,9429,32 NRC 910990)

H. Pwece Utihties Authority of City of Ft. Purce v. Unsed Sutes. 606 F.2d 986,996 0979), cat denied,444 U.S. 462 pcut-licaming review and revocation of hcenses fa put-hecnsing failurer, ISP 9426,32 NRC 37 0 990).

Oawr:1 Pubts thilities Nuclear Cap- (Tiuee Mile Island Nuctsar Sude, Umt 2), LEP 89-7, 29 NRC 138, 141 4 2, 190 (1989) basis for great of rehef in Subpart 1. pnxecomss; LEP 9445,32 NRC 454 n li (1990)

Gewsia Power Co. (Vogtle Dectric Omerating Plars Umts I and 2), ALAB 291,2 NRC 444,408 (1975) bemsoe ebbsatim to irtform presi&ng offker and parues of selevant and material new infamatkm, ISP-9434,32 NRC 255 0990)

Ocorsie Power Co. (Vogtle 13ectiic Generating Plant Units 1 and 2), A!AB 851,24 NRC 529,53431 0 956) dismissal of eneal of intervenor for failure to parecipsie before the bcensing board); ALAB 934,32 NRC 4 0990)

Gewste Power Co. (Vestle Doctric Ocnersting Plant, Uniu I and 2), AIAB-85'),25 NRC 23, 27 (1937) jurindatkm over an issue being appealed; IEP-90 32, 32 NRC 154 0990)

Omargis Power Co. (Vogtle Docuic Generating Nnt, Ur.iu I and 2), AIAB-t?2,26 NRC 177,131 0 987) adequecy of bnef as basu for acceping ar rejecting anmala; ALAD-937,32 NRC 153 rL59 0990)

Gewssa Nwer Co- (Vogtle taectne Generaung Nnt, Umts 1 and 2), thP 8435,20 NRC 887,916 (1954) standing to intervene en Wals of parucipation in other pamedings; 12P 90 29,32 NRC 910990).

. Oreens County Piaming Boani v. FPC,455 P.2d 412 Gd Cir.19?2), cert denied,409 U 3.149 (1972) appbcability to hcenses decishm not to opersie a nuclear power plant; CU 948,32 NRC 2tn 0990) lloustnn Ughting and Poeor Co. (Allais Creek Nuclear Genessung Staim, Umt 1), AIAB 590,11 NRC 542,547 49 Otto)

.marits deternunstions of coreauions at admission stage; AIAlb931,32 NRC 163 nJ5 (1990) llouston Ughtmg and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nudear Genenting Statim, Unit I), AIAD-590,11 NRC

$42,550 51 (1980) purpose of swanary duposicion; ISP-9444,32 NRC 436 (1990)

- liouston Ughting und Power Ca (Alless Creek Nuclear Generating Staim, Unit I), AIAB429,13 NRC 75, 78 0 981).

content of sesponses to summary disposition enetions; LDP 90 46,32 NRC 440 n.13 (1990) liouston Ughting and Power ca (south Texas Pioject. Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-549,9 NRC M4,667 (1979) organizatumal standing to intavene, basis far, LEP 9429, 32 NRC 92 (1990) -

llouston IJghting and Power Ca (Scuih Tnas Pmject. Unita 1 and 2), tRP 7910,9 NRC 439,44346 (1979), aff*d, AIAB 549,9 NRC Mt 0979) basis for stading to imervais in Ecawe amen &nent proceeding; IEP 9429,32 NRC 92 0990) llouston Ughting and Power Ca (Smih Tsaas Ptojcct, Units 1 and 2), LEP-8&l5,23 NRC 595,624 0 956) test for selevance and materiahty of doeurneras;ISP 9044,32 NRC 257 (1990)

KereMcGeo Chemical Corp- (West Chicago Rare Eartha Facihty), LAP-909,31 NRC 150 0990) ensies esposal d mill teihnst; CU 949,32 NRC 212 09M)

M

l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASIS Las liland lightug Ca (Sharsham Nudear Power Statwn, Umt ik A1AB 9m,28 NRC 715,290, amew dedmed, ClJ 85 ll,28 NRC Mil (19tl Amung ruptremail for warmns systems, ALAB 935,32 NRC '70 0990)

Lmg !aland lightag Ca (Shaman Nudent Nwa staum, Umi 1), AIAB 901,28 NRC 302,3074e A a 6, veview dalmed Clj 1811,28 NRC 603 0911) junsdstasi where muluple buanis are used in a amgle hcmams pawdmg. A1AB N2, 32 NRC 418 (1990) lag taland lightmg Ca (Shortham Nudcar Nwa Stauon, LNut ik AIAB 902,28 NRC 423,430, emew decimed, CLJ.81-It,28 NRC 6CD 0918) sestrictwns en use of snuluple tuards m a ainsie lueismg putsc.img. AIAB M2, 32 NRC 421 n.55 0 990) les Island lighung Ca (shcruham Nudear Powa $tstwn, Una ik AIAB.90L 21 NRC 499 (1958) showmg af fmdamaual flaw in an emersecy plan, ALAB ML 32 NkC 425 0990)

Img taland ligh.ing Ca (Sharchen Nudear Powa staum, Umt 11 AIAH 90),28 NRC 499,505 (1988) defuntion of "fedarnesual flaw" in an amargary plan, A1AB442,32 NRC 414 (19'K5 las taland (Jahtmg Ca (shareham Nudent Powa Suuon, Umt 1L ALAB 903,28 NRC 499,506 (1988) spcifruy saluued for admisawn of emergency esercise cmientas, ALAB Wl,32 NRC 352 m38 0 990) tag Island lighung Ca (Shareham Nudear Powa Suu,:n, Una ik ALAB 905,23 NRC 515,522 28 0 958) planmns besu for for mautanna arrangems in emergary plannmg. ALAB M2,32 NRC 405 0 990) tag taland lig%ng Ca (Shashan Nuclear Poma Suuon, Wt 11 CLJ hit,23 hRC 577,38109&ri) fundamental flaw standard admassmn of conteramas en anergmcy esercues, AIAB 942,32 NRC 414 (1990)

Ing Island Llghti,ng Ca (shorchen Nudear Powa Statmn, Wt ik ClJ E13,24 NRC 22 (1986) enga d sealum nute; AIAB-937,32 NRC 149 (1990)

Lag Intend ljahung Ca (shacham Nuclear Power Staten, Una 11 Ctj bl3,24 hKC 7A 30 0966) dorminan of "adequais pmiccuve neasures" as usal in anersaicy planmng vegulauma; DPRM 90-1, 32 NRC 294 OPX')

Img Island lighung Ca (Shorthan Nudear Powa Stauan, Una 1), C1J 413,24 NRC 22, 310986) assumption of beat <ffans restwmas by state and kwal gmernments m an emeramey, AIAB 936,32 NRC 82 a.17 0990) tag Island lighung Ca (Sharehen Nudear Power Sutum, Umt ik Ctj 87-5,25 NRC 334,187-48 (1987) presumpaan of American Red Cams respese Anna en einergenry; ALAB-941,32 NRC 349 (1990) las faland Lishung Ca (Shachan Nudear Power Suuen Unit ik CU 87-3,25 NYC 484, tal (1987) weight gwat no emersecy respnse.

of Ammcan Red Cross; AIAB 937,32 h1C 142 0 990)

La g taland lig%ng Ca (shorehen Nudent Powa Sutwn, Wt ik Ct11712,26 NRC 383 0917) adequecy of 14 mile enersecy plammg ame in cmtsat of severe acadmta, DPRM 961, 32 h1C 290 (1990)

Img Island lighung Ca (shorean Nudear Powa Suuan, Una Ik Ctj 88-11,22 NRC Nf3 0918) fandarnental Daw suratani for hugnuon of eracrgmcy eternse catentes, ALAB MI,32 NRC 345 OMO)

Img Island Lighung Ca (shathan Nuclear Powa statmn, Umt 11 Clj 89-2, 29 NRC 211 (1949) sanctmn of d:svussal for ampamcipata cn remaruled issues, ALAB 934,32 NRC 5 0990)

Laisuna Power and tight Ca (Watedard Simam E)ecuw Suuan, Urst 3), C1J-861,23 NRC 1,5, aff'd sub narrt Oystenhell All.sace v. NRC,100 F.2d 1201 (D C. Chr.1916) bur 4n rm spmsors of rataung nusen; A1AB-9%,32 NRC 42 n.ll 09WJ) 37

i i

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASI'S Mannachusau v. Unned States,856 F.2d 375,383 Ost Gr.1988) apphcabihty of naham rule to schout prioniel, ALAB-937,32 NRC 150 0990)

Meuwchun Fanna Ca Ohne Mile taland Nmlear Saum, Umt 1), ClJ 79 8,10 NRC 141,147 48 0 979) suff chhes6an o serve a pany or estabhah a local pbtw dauman runrn, l.BPW27,32 NRC 42 0 990)

Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Manasanent Co,553 F.2d 620,624 (9th Cir.1977) defmiunn of "maimal fact" for prpnee of sununary dupossuon,12P-444,32 NRC 436 (IN0)

New Izahnd Coahum en Nuclear Puliuum v. NRC,727 F.2d 1177 (DC. Cir.1964) mismaking gmass alylied to fuuncial qua16fwations sule, DPRMW3,32 NkC 331 (1990)

Nonhern ineans f%bbe Servws Co. Clainly Generstang Sunon, Nucleael), ALAll 224, 5 Alf 244, 246-48 0 974) cleans of duenchananent with priar heerums imuni suhngs sa basia for clauna d bus; A1All 936, 32 NRC 43 n.24 (1990)

Noniern In&ana Public Service Ca 014dly Omerstmg Sution, Nucissol), ALAI 6-244,8 AEC 244,251 (1974) durnisaal d a;yeal d kniervmor far failure to panicipate before the twenning tward), AIAll 934,32 NRC 4 0990)

Nonhern States Power Ca (%ne taland Nuclear Omersung 1%nt, Umts I and 2), AIAB.lm,6 A!C 188,192 0F73), aff'd sub nan. Business and Professional People for the Pubtw Imerest v. AEC,502 F.2d 424 (D.C. Cir.1974) unpnyer use d ducover to flesh out vague contenuons, ALAB 942,32 NRC 427 0990)

Nenhern Suies Power Ca (Prune Island Nuclear Omeranns I%ot, Umts i and 2), AIAB 252,8 AEC 1175, aff'd, CU.751,1 NRC 10975) cross-eaanunanas by an irrervmor en an, sher pony's issues, ALAB-941,32 NRC 406 a.N (1990)

Nanbern $uise Power Ca (Praine lahad Nuclasr Genersing 1%nt, Umts I and 2), AIAB-288,2 NRC 390, 393 0 975) forfeiture by intervener d enuticmas to pny suum on prucular issus becans d fadun to pnicipate on unand; A1AB 934,32 h1C 4 and 0990)

Nochern Sutes Power Ca (Tyrone Imergy Pad, Umt 1), AIAB-492, 8 NRC 251 (1978) agyealabihty of &snuaaal of cetanums; AIAB441,32 NRC 144 a4 0990)

NRDC v Callaway,524 F.2d 79,92 (2d Cle.1975) maumed operation as an ahernauve to decommissimms; C1JW8,32 NRC 20s (19%)

NRDC v. Canaway, $N F.2d 79,93 (2d Cir,1W5) consideration of shernauves that are spculative or require changes in governmassi polwy or legsstation; QJMt. 32 NRC 206 0990)

NRDC v. F.PA, 822 F.2d 104, 8%31 (D.C. Or.1987) scope of seiiew undar hT.PA; C1JM8,32 h1C 208 0990)

NRDC v. Monon,458 F.2d 127, $34 (DC. Cir.1972) rule of season in cremderanone of shernauves to pround action; C1JM8,32 NRC.x 0990)

Pacifw Gas and Dectnc Ca (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Power 1%rs, Umta 1 and 2), A1AB.Stx :1NRC 447, 444 0 980) aneal nights of intervenors who fail to panicipais on lacersos issuce being appated, AIAB 934,32 NRC 4 al3 0900)

Pacifw Gas and Doctric Ca (D;ablo Canyon Nuclear Powa Plant, Umas 1 and 2), AIAB-583, il NRC 447, 449 0 910) paniciption by imeristed sute on appeals; AIAB 942,32 NRC 421 a 23 0990)

Pscifw Gas and Doctric Co. (Duble Canym Nuclear ibwer Plant, Untu I and 2), AIAB-756,14 NRC 1340, 1345 (1983) defuntion of sigraficans safety issue for prpme of reqwnuig a record, AIAB440,32 NRC N3 0 900) 3s

~ --

LEGAL, CITATIONS INDEX CASl3 Pacifw Gas and Doctric Ca (thablo Canvun Nuclear Nwer l'iant, Unna I and 2), AIAft 763,19 h*C 571, 577, nview doctmed, CU 8414,20 NRC 285 0984) burden of peaunaum 6a Subpan 1. puceeding on matenals hcense amoidmmt, IRPW45,32 NkC 455 (1990)

Psetts Gas and Doctne Ca (sunulaus Nuclear Pmsect, Usut 1), l.BP.77-45, 6 NTC 159,10 (1977) showmg necessary by typmmt of sununary derettien mouan, l.DPW44,32 NRC 437 (1990)

I%1adelphia Doctric Ca OJmsnch Omerstmg Suncai, thias 1 and 2), AIABDI, 21 NRC 587,592 a 6 0 985) simpmsstalay fcr supplymg bases la conternkms; AIAD 942,32 NRC 417 0990)

Philadelphia Destric Ca (12mench Generating Sunan, Unita 1 and 2), AIAB-814,23 NRC 26.1,264 0 986) weight given to ctuena for eqwdng a reconi, AIAB MO,32 NRC N3 (1990)

Philadelphia Doctne Ca (llmanck Omeraung Suuan, Uruta 1 and 2), A1All H3, 24 NRC 220,210

. (1986) pupone of specifwity equimners fur setussum of cetmums AIAD 942,32 NFC 4D eL107 (1990)

Wiladelphia Derwic Ca (Peach thxwen Aiamc INmer $tauon, Units 2 and 3), ALAB 216, 8 AEC 13, 20, rev'd in part on other gnmnds, ClJ 74 32,8 Af.C 217 0974) spenrwity nquired of contention bases, AIAB-W2,32 NRC 421 (1990)

Puster County Chapur of the lasak Wahan Imgue v. AEC, 533 F.2d toll (7th Cir.), cert, daued, 429 U.S. 945 (1976) standard for considention of class 9 accidents; DD'904,32 NRC 51 sti (1990)

Portland Omeral Deanc Ca (Pehhle Springs Nuctsar Plant, Umts I and 2), ClJ427,4 NRC 610,612, 614-17 (1976) test for decrenonary interventim by an orgammation; LRPM24,32 NRC 15 (1990)

Po Cand Gmeral Doctnc Ca Utojan Nuclear liant), AIAB-531,9 NRC 263, 27174 0979) knierpicanen of manas that must be includai in tecnrucal specirmatsma; LRPN25,32 h1C 23 0 9901 need far cyckspecinc eparating hmits to he in Tectuucal Specifwauons; 1RP439,32 NRC 3ae 0 940)

Power Authority of the Sure of New Yoak (Ovenne Caanty Nuc1cer Power Mant), IRP 79 8,9 NRC 339, 340 0 979) fmdes to be made by bcensms board pnar to gnnt of summary duposinon mouon; 1.BP-90-44,32 NRC 437 0990) lussa Oss Consumera Group v. U.S. Deparuncnt of Agricuhuse,694 F.2d 728,169 (2d Cir.1981) range of thernauves to propamed actim to he considered, Cljet,32 NRC 206 (1990)

Public Servios Ca of Indiana (Marble liin Nuclear Omerstmg Sudan Unita 1 and 2), WIP-863?,24 NRC 719 (1986) board pnsdiction pnar to issuance of Neuce et lleanng: LBPM32,32 NRC 184 r1990)

PuW 5emce Ca of New ilampshire (Seabsook Suum, Unsta 1 and 2), AIAB-748,18 h.M 1884 (1983); AIAB-749,18 NRC 1895 0913); AIAB.751,18 NRC 1313 (19t))

claans of dM-~' wuh prior hconams board ruhngs sa basu for claena of bias. AIAB-94 32 NRC 43 a.34 (1990)

PuW 5ervico Ca of New llampshire (Seabinok Suuan, Umta 1 and 2), QJ-89 3,29 NRC 234,241 (1949) disnuasal si contenuen based an facuaal ;;na..r that has been essentially rep,hnsd by the source of that document, ALAB 938,32 NRC 162 0990)

Pubbe Servia Ca of New llamphits (Seabmok Suuan, Uruts 1 and 2), LfP 83 32A,17 NRC 1170, 1174 a 4 (1983) coruent of respmses to surmnary dispusuian mouena; 1. BPM 44,32 NRC 440 a.13 0990)

Puhhc Sermes Ca of Oklahoma (Black Foi sunon, Unas 1 and 2), ALAB-397,5 NRC 1143,1145 (1977) test for discreuenary intervenuon by en organiaauen, IRP424,32 NRC 15 (1990) 39

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX i

CAsl3 I

Rndwell laternaumal Carp (RodaJyne Dnianm), ALAB 975,30 NRC 709 (1989), affd, Clj 90 5, 31 NRC 337 (1990) authonny of pasang officer w complete the beanns record, ISP M27,32 NRC 42 n.3 (1990) board Nrwktion poor to tasuance of Noues d llaanng; LEPM32,32 NRC 184 (1990)

$an luis Obispo Whers for Penes v. NRC, 751 F.2d 12s? (D C, Ctr.1984) maten.hty of low-gewer iesung w grant of fagewer twense AIAB 940,32 NRC 232-33 (1990)

San Ima Obispo When for Peace v. NRC,719 F.2d 26, 30 (D C Cte 1986), cart deed 479 U.S 923 (1986) hearing tighu a low pvwer testing; ALAB 940, 32 NRC 241 a44 (1990)

Siegel v. AEC,400 F.2d 778 (DC Cir.1968) acalce and consnera pnredures for omaulersuon of state abernanvt mandants for regulaum of bypro&act matenal, CLJ M9,32 NHC 215 (1990) sierra Club v.1.ynn,502 F.2d 43,62 (5ds Or.1974), cert derued,421 UJL 994 (1975) consideration of alusnauves that are speculauve or require changes in govermnmal puhey or legalsum; CLJMS,32 NRC 206 (1990)

Swrra Club v. NRC,862 F.2d 222 (9th Cir.1989), as amended motim la remnadoratte d environmetal cmtasaan; ALAB 938, 32 NRC 159 (1990)

Southern Califorms FAam Ca (San Omfie Nuclear Generating Suuan, Umts 2 and 3), LEP 8249,15 NRC 1163,117173 (1982) estaruum af 174 because of evacuouen shadow g+iernneose, DPRM M1,32 NRC 307 (1990)

Statsmas of Polwy on Cmduct of licmsmg I%ceedings, C1J-sl.8,13 NRC 452,457 (1981) parpose of surnmary dwposiucn; ISP-9044,32 NRC 436 (1990)

Tennessee Valley Andanty (Bmwns Ferry Nuclear Nat. Uniu 1,2, and 3A ALAB477,15 NRC 1387, 1348,13M (1982) bconsee chhtaum a inform piesiens offwer and parues et relevars and mataial on informatum, ISPM36,32 NRC 269 (1990)

Tennessee Valley Authority (watts Bar Nuclear Plau, Umu 1 and 2). ALAB413,5 b1C 1418,1421 a4 (1977) basis for sunding w intervene in beanse ammenen pencee&ng LEPM29,32 NRC 92 (1990)

Tamessee Valley Audeniy (Watu Bar Nuclear Plant, Umts I and 2), ALABall,5 NRC 1418,1422 (19M) test for discreuorary intervenum by an orgsmasuon; LEPM24,32 NRC 15 (1990)

Texas Utilines Genersung Ca (Comasche Peak Steam Datnc Sunon, Umts i sad 2), QJ 8146,14 NRC 1111,1814 (1981) effect of a pany's withdrawal a hugation of its catenuans-ISP432,32 NRC 18) (1990) test for determirang whether to aJrgt diamused intervena's casantuma sua spmte, ISP40 24, 32 NRC 18 (1990)

Texas Utilsass Omerating Co. (Comandw Peak Steam Datne Suum, Units 1 and 2), LEP.83-il,18 NRC 1410,1452-54 (1983) besu for grant of reiwi in subpart 1. proceedings; LEPM45,32 NRC 454 m.Il (1990)

Unim Da:tru Co. (Canaesy Nnt, Urut l), ALAB.740, it h1C 343,346 (1983) defuntion of sigmficais safety issus far purpcs of rayoung a record, AIAB 940,32 MtC 24.3 (1990)

Unim of Cmcerned Sewiusta v. NRC, 735 F.2d 1437 (D.C, Cw.1984), esit dmied, 449 U S.1132 (1985) matenahey of low-power taung in greit of f4 power heense; ALAB-940,32 NRC 232 (1990)

Unim of Concerned Scuntisu v. NRC,735 F.2d 1437,144142 (D C. Or.1954), cas demed 469 US.

1132 (19t5) maaeriahty of energency pianning detmames w grant of f4pmer hcmse, AIAB MO,32 NRC 232 (1900) 4e

IIG AL CITATIONS INDEX cases Vammt Yankee Nwlear Power Corp. (Vennau Yankee Nunear her Sutim), AIAB-138,6 Airc 520,

$23 (1973) suppen fw madms to vagas; AIAB MO,32 NRC 242 (1990)

Virginia thstic and Power Co. (Neh Ama Power Suuan, Uniu I and 2k A1AB-30,4 NRC 01 (1976) ust for discreuonary inurwnuun by an organuate; ULP#24, 32 NRC 15 (1990)

Vegmie Dectic and Power Co. (Nar1h Ama Power Suta, Uniu i and 21, ALAB-522,9 NRC $4,56 (1979) tuna for sunding to intervae in bcome amastraent pnxeeshns. L.BP-9029, 32 NRC 92 (1940)

Yugmia Docuic and Ibwer Co. (Nmh Anna Power Summ, Umu I and 2), AIAB $84,11 NRC 451 (1980) catws of respeses to ownmary duposinon motme; IJIPM44,32 NRC 440 n.13 (1990)

Washmsum Public Power Supply Sysum (WPPSS Nclear Project No. 2), D(114-7,19 NRC 499,923 (1984) standard fcr institutim et show<ause pareedings; DD945,32 NRC 128 (1990K IX1947,32 h1C 278 (1990); DOL 948,32 NRC 496 (1990) 41 I

m. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _

~ - _ _. -

1 l

l i

b LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RFGt'tATIONS i

~

10 CF.R. Pan 2 ame..dman to mnstate fmancial quahncanons regaranaus; DPRM 943, 32 NRC 328 (1990) l 10 CER. 24 l

rencation of delimrm of *alectne utday*; DPRM 943,32 NRC 328 (1990) 10 CF1. 2.103,1141 l

paa notice sad heannas m special nuclear mawnal hcenses OPM23,32 NRC 8 (1990) l 10 CF.R.11rg(ex4) smmiment to nunstate 6nancal qualiacauena seqmromeras, DPRM 943, 32 NRC 323 0990) k 10 CFA 1101 W

authonty of a bcerd to dessumme issues selated to a mthJrswal of an ambestam, bued on amte of 7

hearing; UIP 90 32, 32 NRC 186 (1990) tesal junsdictmen pner to isamace of Nece d lisanng. LM9432,32 NRC 184 (1990) e f

10 CF.R. Pan 2, Subpns B and O

(

[

actice of heanng on sivil pensby; LDP-9431,12 NRC 107 (1990) g 10 CF.R.12041206 reguisuons apphcable to low pows insting; AIAB440, 32 NRC 235 0990)

(

10 CF.R. 2,201(c) immatans effemvenma of bcenae -- ". atanda.J for, MP 9426, 32 NRC 33 a.10990)

Y 10 CF.R.1201-2.205 notice and haanns procedures far enform santuons; ALAB 940,32 NRC 237 a33 (1990) i 10 CF.R.1202

[

scope d rdwt under DS947,32 NRC 275 (1990) 10 CF.R.1203 heensms board awhcnty to answe seulemans of show-cause poccalmas; 12P 444, 32 NRC 465 0 990) waght given to puitim of staff in terminnung a prmcedag on the basis of a settleners agreeman, LBP428,32 NRC 86 (1990) 10 CFA.1206 sccumulanon of operaung discharsis born Seabrod plass, daual o' ; aamm sacrung praavial for ha m fran; DS944,32 NRC 4615 0990) derval of petitim alleging ernerscncy bahung and Ese pnaectum wwlations and NRC personnel perpiccia; DD947,32 NRC 274 (1990) dasal of petition sequestag casation of defueling and destaffing at Shoreham; DS948,32 NRC 471 (1990) satension a stay d operating bcasse sequested en basis of recent previously undmelnned industry supons of nmecmphance at Seabionk; DD945,32 NRC 114128 (1990) needpdicawry smie for emsidersuon of sigrufican safety emeerns; CW 9410,32 NRC 221 n.5 0 990) violanim of induncal specincauens at Perry plans, denial of 1206 peuuan allegmg, DD946,32 NRC 195-99 0 990) l 43 l

l e

e

,w--,e n--mn.-,-nm

=

---m,

m m._

LI: GAL CITATIONS INDEX lt lGt't.ATIOM 10 CSA 1714 a&tussildhty of cauaumns in nperating twense amaulment pmeenhng; ISP 9039,32 NRC 3tA (1990) cornent of tuais sugnetag a corwentwn, AIAB 942,32 NRC 428 (1990) 10 CFL 1714(a) sundard for haavenum in opersung twense snan,tment poreakngs, ISPW29, 32 NRC 91 (1990) 10 CFA 1714(aXI) anheation of 6* facer test to umely 61ed corse:umns, AIAB 938,32 NRC 160 (1990) 6mfsetor test for admissa of 14 e-filed casenuans; A1AB.937,32 NRC 147 a40 (1990) 6*fsom test for a&masion of supplanenu to cuscrukes, AIAB-938,32 NRC 10 a.5 (1990) 10 CFA 1714(sXIXi)4v) cnteria for grant of moum to varia relaung to assues na pwvmusly in corarmersy amrrg the paruas, A1AB 936,32 NRC 79 (1990) 10 CFA 1714(sX3) amenanmi of haavenuan peuexna wuhout leave d the boant LRP 9029,32 NRC 91 (19W) 10 CFA 1714(b) beam and speciacity saquinnmus for adnussim of contentums, ALAB 941,32 NRC Mi n5 (194, ALAB442i32 NRC 426 n104 (1990) 6* factor test far adrnission of ag[danents to casantms; ALAB 938,32 NRC 10 n3 (1990) 10 CFA 1714(bXI) deadhne far Elms creunumsw. IRPM29,32 NRC 91 (1990) 10 CFA 1714(bX2) consere of cetersumu. LBP 9429,32 NRC 92-93 (1990) speciacity smparemaits for ententmn bases; ALABM2, 32 NkC 426 n.104 (1990) suppmma docwnenuuan required for contassons at adminim auge, AIAB-918,32 NRC IM (1990) 10 CFA 1714(dX2) suppetes docianentation raper J for catentums et adnussum sugs; ALAB 938,32 NRC IM (1990) 10 CFA 17;,dX2Xii) prepadsman d menu of a consavam; LBPM25,32 h1C 25 (1990)

IC CFS 1715(c) partiapstion by intensted suis on ages!a; AIAB-942,32 NRC 421 ng3 (1970) 10 CFA 1718 othgatinn of offsas twensmg board to refer appropnais mauers to ensiis hcensing baard in mulupla board procerdags; ALAB-942,32 NRC 421 n85 (IPM))

10 CFA 17200iX2Xi),60 dismvwy of NRC suff; ISP443,32 NRC 392 (1990) 10 CFA 2.730(f) appeatabihty of damasal of conumaru, AIAB-94),32 NRC 344 n4 (1990) to CFA 1734 l

adrnuman mandards embed to low-pnwer testing contanums, A!ABM 32 h1C 119,241 (1990) bunten a prepmas of remming nuse, C1J 9410,32 NRC 221 (1990) entana for re9ening a tecord a low-power tesung usues; AIAB 940,32 NRC 232 (1990) to CFA 17M(a) cruana far sant of motim to regen; AIAB 9M,32 NRC 79 (1990); ALARM 32 NHC 242 (1990) 10 CFA 1734(aXI) umalmess of regaues naxions based on new leaers or empresnons of concern that are not prunptly j

develated en new tnformation; CtJW10,32 NRC 222 (199%

10 CFA 17441742 authortsatuut for dacovery in semanded operating bcense penceedmg, LBPM40,32 NRC 379 (IMO) 10 CFA 1740(00) ducmsry of NRC Suff, tRPM43,32 NRC 392 (199Q t

l 10 CFA 1740s(j) discovery of NRC Suff, LEPM43,32 NRC 392 (19M1) i 44 l

LEG Al, CITATIONS INDEX Rlut!!ATIONS 10 CFA 1741(a) dismvwy of NRC Suff, IEPW43,32 NRC 392 (19W) 10 CFA 1743 disuncuan between admisam inte eviderre and induzion en dmiet f,le; 12tP 9436, 32 NRC 2r,9 (IMO) 10 CFL 1744 discowy el NDC ataff, [BP-9M3, 32 NRC 392 (1990) 10 CFA 17(s authonty of paidmg efficers under, LEPM26,32 NRC 36 (1990) 10 CFA 2a49(s) burdem m apponent of summary disPmitine moum; ISnW44,32 NRC 416 (1990) sisteman of esierial ison accompnyms sunwnery durostunn mouon; ISPN26,32 NRC 35 (IN0) 10 CFA 1749(b)

Imrden a syponsras of sunmary duraita; WIPW40,32 NRC 377 (1990); ISPM44,32 NRC 436, 440 n!) (1990) casara et aspesas w samary dupuluun mcuans; LDPM44,32 hkC 440 n13 (1990) 10 CFA 1749(d) showing necesary to ehtam summary duraition; LMPW44. 32 NRC 4)6 (1990) standard for grsas of summary &spmium; ISPM26,32 NRC 36 (1990) 10 CFA 1760 ertealaislity of dismissal of intervenor, LSPM24,32 NRC 19 (1990) 10 CFA 176%)

appalatahay et insual densas, ISPM39,32 NRC 371 (1990)

Anatuy of twensing board approval of seulemens sgreemmts, IEPW46, 32 NRC 465 (1990) 10 CFA 1760s bossd $n&ny sequired unda, pior to dedaratim af sua sysse isma IRPM32,32 NRC 145 (1990) procedure for saising sua spune issure; IJPM25, 32 NRC 25 (1990) standard for licanang based sua spess sagtze of uncontemned issues; ISPM32,32 NRC 183 (1990) standard for sus sponsa s& ten at issues by the posidmg d5cer; ISPN24,32 NRC 17 (1990) 5 sua spente sayuen of issues becaans of dismusal et sole remausms unsrvmw, ISPM24,32 NRC 13 (1990) 10 CFA 1762 appeals of deetam appuving operating bcaue snadment; LEPM39,32 NRC 3?0 (1990)

Canmassu:e revww of heensms tuard orpimal et seuleman agreemerca; LEP-9044,32 NRC 465 Y

(1990) 10 CFA 1762(d)(1) pseposed Andmas of fact on and spraak af tasuas ont P aced in couruwco* - an intervaur, l

ALAB-942,32 NRC 406 a.24 (1990) to CFA 1764 l

imme&sts effectivenus review of dautons autharuing operating heense issuance, ALAll 9R 32 NRC 3 a.4 (1990) 10 CFA 1764(fX2)6), (iii) defunta of low-power hcess; A1AB-940,32 NRC 229 n.1 (1990) -

l 10 CFA 1788 faihive of awtion for exterum et suy to sodrssa enteria; DD945,32 NRC 110 (1990) gend for innporary stay of heensda use of plutaniam, amerara, and neptunium; IEPM38,32 NRC 360 (1990) sundants la grans of a may el suff's Ikansms actas; UlPM30,32 NRC 98 (1990) 10 CFA 1788(d) rigts of irnervenars w reply to ternprary star; IEPW34,32 NRC 361 (1990) 45 l

t r-

1.EGAl, CITATIONS INDEX ltFCt'tATlONS 10 C.FR.1788(s) failute of em*xm to addreas sur criiens, CUMll,32 NRC 334 (19K0 standants fa gnni of a suy of a Staff heensing scum; 12PW35,32 NRC 262 (19W) 10 CFR.1788(3) circunstances apprornale for grant of ternparary suy; U1PW35,32 NRC 261 sL1, 262 (IN0) purpose of grain of suy of Staff heensing setim, IRPM35,32 NRC 262 (1990) 10 CFA 17580) nght d buervenars to reply to temporary stay; IEP-9438,32 NRC 361 (1990) 10 CF.R.1790 deemery of NRC Sta!!; LSP443,32 NRC 392 (1990) hmiuuans a release of documans by Staff, LEP 9436,32 NRC 2r>9 (1990) 10 CJ R.112050) appbcatuhty to haurdous matenals, WIPN23,32 NRC 11 (1990) paar nouco and huangs a special nudear autenal heenses LEPW23,32 NRC B (1990) wamr er eacgder. io, WIPM23,32 NRC 9 (1990) 10 CFR. 2.12tN(k) analysa of wnisen 6hngs to deterwuns oned for oral arswnens, LEP 9441,32 NRC 385 (1990) 10 CF.R.11215(a) nahts of murdswyer rerve=esauvo of an organiuuen, IEPW24,32 NRC 15 (1990) 10 CFR Il231(a)(1) suff etegnum in scrw a pany er eauMuh a local puNac dueumme rman,1.11PW27,32 NRC 42 (1990) 10 CFA 11231(b) authonty of presulms of5cer to presenbe means fin canpleung a acord, IEP% 27,32 NRC 41 (1990) inctusim af DOE documents ht twaring b en metmans hcenas amandnaa; ISPW33,32 NRC 250 (1990) inclusien af Nenres docunans frorn a alated procuahng in material heense amendmess hunns file, 12PM33,32 NRC 250 (1990) incorpornuen of documans in a p2Nw docunert emn imo a hearms b; utPW27,32 h1C 42 (1990) 30 CF.R.18231(c)

Staff abhgation to uptase bautng h; LEPM34,32 h1C 254 (1940) 10 CFA 2.1233 analysis of wnum flhngs to deiermins ned for oral argumera, UtPW41,32 NRC 345 (1990) compteuen of bearms file in informal proms 4ngs; LSPM33, 32 NRC M7 (1990) evsdence act in the heanna b la informal puceahngs; LEPW3),32 NRC M4 a.4 (1990) 10 CFA 112.13(c) defmency er endsswm in special nuclear maianals hcmas; LEP'9443,32 hVC 45.3 (1990) latitude of presahng efker in Subpart L m:ecangs; LSPW43,32 NRC 454 (1990)

I 10 CF.R. 2,1235 analysa d wnnen Almp to detennins need for oral arguners; LSP 90 41,32 NRC 385 (1990) 10 CF.R. 2.1237(b) burde m propment a( mouan to cenafy; 13P423,32 b1C 9 (1990) 10 C.PA 11239(a) htigatality of challenges to paceduni regulations affectag issuance d spcual nuclear matmal hcenaca, i.

12PM23,32 NRC 9 (1990) 10 CF.R. 2.1239tb) gmuni for eacepam in regulauces; UlPM21,32 bVC 9 (1990) sundard for directal cenificatim of challenged regulatuma; LAPN23,32 NRC 9 (1990) l l

i l

.~-

_~_

..-~ -- -

l l

1 LI:G AL CITATIONS INDEX ki GULATION5 10 CFJL 1120 authanty to issue a temp =ary sisy; LSPM30,32 NRC 98 (1990), ISP M35, 32 NRC 262 (1990) gned int tempmary suy of leefs une of plutmtum, amanum, and neptunium, ISP W38, 32 NRC 360 (i990) purpass d grare of stay of Staff heensing acum; ISPW35,32 NRC 262 0990) treannes of aquest for stay pen &ng hearma es m;uest for temprary stay; 13PM35,32 NRC 2610 990) 10 CFA ha 2. Appenda A. Vill (bX4) amendmars a mnasie Anancui quahAcanons myuunnents, DeKhl9G3,32 NRC 32% (1990) 10 CFA hn 2. Aryenda C amenant d civG penalty; LEP 9M3,32 NRC 3910990) nmeangwnee with legaUy baneng pquaranents as basis far enfoetemers ecum; DD90 5,32 NRC iiI (1990) regulations sppsable to kw pows issung; ALAB 910, 32 NRC 235 0990) 10 CFA Pan 2. APPenda C,11 formal mfoetaners sancums. ALAll 480,32 NRC 237 nJ3 (1990) 10 CFA hn 2 Aggada C, VJi admmisunun enforcanas mechamernt AIAIOto,32 NRC 237 n.33 0990) 10 CFA Pan 2, Argada C, VJIO) purpose of cm6rmatory action letters; A1AB.440,32 NRC 237 0990) 10 CFA hn 20 tilTA Ehrstian,y

.- fur usesre naciar, LEPM30,32 NRC 102 (1990) standant for nicase of reduwcuve gaens dunna ammal opersuon, DD9M,32 hr 44,53 09%)

10 CF R 20.l(c)

A1 ARA mandard for rs&oeme releases from neeard reackr, IEPW30,32 NRC 98 (1990)

AIARA sunderd far e 6== of anyturuum er pluturuum; 12PW35,32 NRC 263 (1990) 10 CFA 20.105 hmtis en napumurn a plutonium releases, LEP 9435,32 NRC 20 (1990) 10 CF.R. 20 IM lunas en napumisn er pluiamurs r*==. LAPW35,32 NRC 263 0990) hmina en rieasme niesses fran naean:h reactar, IEPW30,32 NRC 98 0990) 10 CFA Pan 30 emergerry gwpambiens nquuanents for possession of plusonium-241; IEPW38,32 NRC 30 E9 0990), LSP 9MS,32 NRC 452 a4 (1990) 10 CFA 3032th) applicahihty d -!-

g regulauens to pussessum d rs&ataan in an maaled forra; IEP-9MS, 32 NRC 456 (1990) 10 CFA 30320) appucabihty whos twense was granted bdors effecun dans of naulauon, ISPM34,32 NRC 364 (1990) -

10 CFA 30.326)0) amourns of amencium for which emeramcy plans are aqsared, LAPW35,32 NRC 2M,265 (1990) appheatahty to possessms d unsealed rs&oscovo nources; LEPW27,32 NRC 41,42 m.2 (IMO) ovaluaraon of dose effects or emersecy plaming squuwnmu for ymessa d re&ation in an unsealed form; 13P 9045,32 NRC 455-56 0990) 10 CFA 3033(aX2) equipmars and facihty standards for bypmduct material hcenses; 13PM30,32 NRC 93 (1990) standards et prosecum required in chiam bypmduct materuns tweses. IEPW35,32 NRC 20 0990) 10 CFA 30J5(c) apphcability where apphcauen was Aled befare agulation was enacted LSPW45,32 NRC 459 0990) 10 CFA 30.72 amants of amencium for which emergency plans are required, IRP#35,32 NRC 2M 0990) 47

.- -m

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX kEGl?tATIONS 10 CF R. Part 40 emersmcy peq= redness rapinments for possessum of pluuuuwn-241; LEPW38,32 NRC 363 n9 (1990); IEP-9MS,32 NRC 452 n5 (1990) perpetual care of LMTRCA Tule I saas; DPRM 902,32 NRC 324 (1990) purpose of eactusum of IMTRCA Tale I anos. DPRM 42,32 NRC 322 (t990) 10 CFA Pan 40, Amedt A saiensim to bypwfust sna'enal eat subject no hcensing. DPRMW2,32 NRC 320,324 (1090) 10 CFA Pan 50 amedment of emergency planmns ame sue requunnenu; DftM 941,32 NRC 216 0990) amendment to mnstate 6nancial qu6h6cnona segunmerica. DPRM 943, 32 NRC 328 0990) 10 CFA 50.2 revocatum et dennuum of *slectrw stihty*; DPRM 90 3, 32 NRC 321 (1990) purpme a decorrenissiming; CUW8. 32 NRC 0990) 10 CFA 504 dennt:iun of "deconunissuing*; DD968,32 NRC 491 (1990) 10 CFA 509(a) bcense sevocatka of gmmd thes informsuan pnmded to Conunissa was n a cmphe and secursui in all matenal respecss; LEPW26, 32 NRC 34 07)o) 10 CFA 50,12 atandard frw grant of esemptes innn regulatims, DllMS,32 NRC 491 (1990) 10 CFA 50.12(sX2Xil), Oii) esemreen inna ensus pnmary popeny damage insurance raparsment DD 964,32 NRC 488,49091 0 990) 10 CFA 503)(f) amendment to mnstais 6nancial quahfwatmna saluunnents; DPRM 943, 32 NRC 328 (1990)

Anancial quah8 cations for constna: tion of pmbatam faahty, ISPWA 32 NRC 37,38 (1990)

Anancial quahAcatens of antwant to construct proprzed facility in exh a way as to enans adequaw i

j pnzaction of comman datenas and secunty; LEPWA 32 NRC 33 0990) method tw ensunns out hemaces with 6nancial pn*derns cmunue to cmiply wah rcgulauwy

~

requiremerus; DPRMW),32 NRC 330 0990) rulemaking pecess apptal to 6nanctal quahacations rule; DPMM 943,32 hKC 330 0990) 10 CFA $006 corems of techmcal spacincanons; IEPW25,32 NRC 27 0990) interpmatim of mauers that enust to included in sectuusal spartfwatwns; ISP-9025,32 NRC 23 0 990) remmel d informane fun technical specineauensi (EPW25,32 NRC 25 (1990) 10 CFA 50.40(b) l smandment to somstaic Anancial qualt6cnons rapnremeras; DIVM903, 32 NRC 328 (1990) 10 CF.R. 50.47(aXI) adequacy et de;ossammauan facihnee sa past of renamable assurance standant A1AB-942,32 NRC 425 n97 0990) scope of anergency sacrcisa, AIAS441,32 NRC 352 (19W) 10 CF.R. 5047(aX2) basis fm NRC 6ndings en adequacy of emergency planmng; DD9M,32 NRC M 0990) scope of emergewy esemas; ALABMI,32 NRC 352 0990) waght given to FEMA views en adequacy of emergency planmng, CUW10,32 NRC 222 0990) 10 CFA 50.47(b)

Scabmok energmcy preparedness trainms, adequacy of; DS945,32 NRC 113 (1990)

Seabrod penenei knowlmige and performance of dutwo, adequacy of DD945,32 NRC 112 (1990) 10 CFA 5047(bX4) sespanadmhty for estabhahms einergewy action levela: AIABM2,32 NRC 419 nT) 0990) 44 I

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX R E Gt'IA110SS 10 CFA 50 4?@)(5) odequacy d early acitfwanon and clear instn>cta of ow general pitdw; ALAB 942,32 NRC 4:1 (1990) early eenAcatim and instructen requimnenu in emergmcy planning, ALAlb9%,32 NRC 79 0990) emergewy woming systan fw Seahmt*, adequacy af, ALAB 935,32 NRC 62 0990) 10 CFA Sa47(bX10) pnmecuw actkm acerwnendann dectam cruena; ALAB 942,32 NRC 415, 417 (1990) 10 CFA 5047(bX14) save of emergency easseise; ALAB 941,32 NRC 352 (1990) 10 CFA 5047(cXI) best4fforts presumpion; AIAB 942,32 NRC 431 a.130 0990) hemse anspersion far inadequaos ta protecnve acte scansnavlauen genersum, A1AB 412, 32 NRC 422 (1990) standant for lismas suspensma relauve to emergency plaroung deAcimcus, AIAS 937,32 NkC 152 0 900) standant tw rescisam of opernung bcense authauanon based on ernergency planrung ds6ctacies.

ALAB-939,32 NRC 150 0990) 10 CFA $0.47(cXIXiii) apphcabihty of reatus@ cat efforts sule to school teaders AIAB-937,32 NRC 148,149 (1990) answr4mian a best4ffons resporwe by stata and local g<mrrenants in an emersercy; AIAB 9M,32 NRC 82 a.l? (1990) 10 CFA 50.4 hex 2) amendman of emergency planning sme sua requuirnents, DPRM 41,32 NRC 2M 0990) site 4peci6c facsars in amargancy plans; DPkM 901,32 NRC 312 0990) 10 CFA 5047(d) dennita af k= tower heense, AIAB 940,32 NRC 219 a.10990) anergency,,....-2x requinmaras far k= tower openunns; DPRM 90wl,32 NRC 314 (1990) 10 CFA 50.54(f) adequacy a llLIO respmse in infamauan requesu; DD944,32 NRC 444 0990)

NRC authoruy to okaan Saancial informata frcen hconsees; DFitM 943,32 NRC 330 0990) 10 CFA 50.54(wXI) stamptiert from onsite pnrnary prTerty damage insurance ratuisanent, DD9058,32 NRC 473,411, 492 (1990) prpose e( bisurance requuemers; DD948,32 NRC 489-90 0990) t$ CFA 50.55(e) 1.Nie to epost vintaties sa basis fa enforcement scuorg DD945,32 NRC 1110990) 10 CO. 50.56 purpcss d prerperat%1 tesung; AIAD-940,32 NRC 238 (1990) 10 CFA $4.51(aX4) aMm en teirt'de Anancial quali6cauans requirernets; DPRM-943, 32 h1C 328 0990) 10 CFA,,M7(c) low.pwar tesung dunns pendency of fulltower op:rsung beaming proceeding; AIAB-940,32 NRC D4 0900) purpose e( kmtower testing; AIAB 940,32 NRC 119 a.10990) regulannry a.: heme when lowtower testing is conducted under a lowtower beanse, A1AB-940,32 NRC 23637 0990) standant for grant of low-pewer tesung bcense; AIAB440,32 NRC 229 0990) 10 CFA 50.59 Cmumanim appwal of defueling operstma; DD948,32 NRC 479 0990) cornpliance with mww sequiremans et shareham; DG948,32 NRC 444 (1990) unreviewed safeiy quesuons in Shacham defuehrg; DD%l,32 b7C 445,444 (1990) 49

~

.~-

LEG AL CITATIONS INI)EX RlOt'l A110NS 10 CFA Sa72, and Sa73 failure to repon tiolaims as basis far enforcanent acnon; DD945,32 NRC 111 (1990) 10 CF R. 50.75 relatamship of insurance requiriena4 to overall decommissiming. DD 90-4,32 NkC 491 (19W) 10 CFA 50.80 transfer of operstmg lcenses; DD 90 8,32 htC 478 (1990) i 10 C.FA 30 82 defunta af *desarranissioning"; DD90 8,32 NRC 4910990)

NRC sprroval of decanmssaurung plans; C1J 945,32 NRC 2M (IWO) estatuuhip of insurance requiraneni in overall decommissuvung; DD90 8,32 NRC 491 (19W) termuutum d openung beenseur, DD 90 8,32 NRC 473 (1990) 10 CFA 50.92(c) challeriam to htwee amendmerns lnvolving admmisusuve mouss lhet niae no spificant hasards emsideration; IJIP-9425,32 NRC 23 (1990) no signiacars haards consideration salmd to runwal of cycle-openAc opersung hmita, LRP 9439,32 NRC 369 (1990) 10 CF.R. hn 50, Appeda A, GDC 62 capacity of Shmeham spent fuel pel for defueles purposes DD-908,32 NRC 484 (1990) 10 CFA ha 50, Amendia B adapuy d managarnes and admmistraun cmuuls sa demonsusied darvig kmtower testms.

A1Ah-HO,32 NRC 242 0990) 10 CFA Pin 50, Amanda C Anancial quahncauana for ennsuuctwn of prmlucta facihty; IJIP 9tK26,32 NRC 37,38 0990) 10 CFA ha 50, Amanda E emergency actum levels for in-pant measuremana for sluch emrqawiss should he devsloped, DPRM 901,32 NRC 295 (1990) 10 CFA hn 50, Amenda E, IV SeahnxA personnel kamledge and priormance of duuss, adequacy a(; DD905,32 NRC 112 0990) l 10 CFA hn 50, Amanda E. IV.C l

classes of emergency actum levuls; ALAB 942,32 NRC 419 a77 (1990) 10 CFA hn 50, Amanda E, IV,D serly notiAcaxsi and instructum requuemeros in emergency dauung; AIAB-936, 32 NRC 79 0990) 10 CFA ha 50, Ameida E, IV.D3 adequacy d early amneatum and clear instsuctum of the general public; ALAB 942,32 NRC 422 0 990) alset signal acuvide and F.B5 brundcaat, tuna's requimmersa far ALAB-935, 32 NRC 10 0990) design objective of penmpt puhbc notincauen sysian, AIAB 935,32 NRC 63, ed a46 0990) l design objectives far coverste and canpletum of bruual nouncatim af the public d an emergency; A1AB-936,32 NRC 79 (1990) i

_Afase minute initial notiacaum reymmnad; AIAB 941, 32 NRC M6, 349 n.26 0990) l Aftecaeunute requirement far early n<sdicatwo of subdogical energency, AIAB-W2,32 NRC 4I)

(1990) ireerpusation of capabihty; ALAB-9.15,32 NRC 63 0990) tuning requirernata, interpretatinn of; A1AB 935,32 NRC 67,6B 0990) 10 CFA hrt 50, Amendia E, IV.F -

l Saabrmt energency pteparedness unming, adapuy of, DD90 5,32 NRC 113 0990) 10 CFA ha 50, Amedia E, IVE.1 l

Amencan Red Cass norparticipsuon in anersency naruse; ALAB 941,32 NRC M9 (1990) de6nition of new-power hcase; A1AB-MO,32 NRC 229 n.1 ONO) asnpo of emergmey ascense of alert and notilkauon systan, ALAB-Hl. 32 NRC M5 0990) twyear taluiremas for conduct of fuD anacipatumi emergency stanse; AIAB 941,32 NRC M5 a 6 t

(1990) l 54 l

l I

l l

I

i II,U AL CITATIONS INI)l3 R6 Gl't,ADONS 10 CFE. hn 50, Anadta I., IVE.1 et4 senre of fuU-parucipsum ernergary eternse, AIAD 94),32 NRC 345 a6,351 (1990) 10 Cl R. Pan 50, Anedia I., lY16 spplicakhty of saanptam from anergary esercue perucipatam to Ameman Red Cams, AIAB 941,32 NRC 350 (1990) 10 CFK. Pan 50, Agawht I standani for release d rs&oacuve gews duruig ammal opreuen; DDM4,32 NRC 44,51,52 (19H5 10 CIR. Pan 50, Amadia E requiremana far anergerry cwe coolmg sysicma; DDM4,32 NRC 52 (1990) 10 CFS. hn 51 aswirmmanal revww requtrummia fa defuelms spastama, DD 90 8, 32 NRC 476, 478, 412, 487, 495 (1990) 10 CFA. 51.22(cX14)(v) apphcakhty to essessois of unsealet ra&oacun sourtes, LEP M27,32 NRC 41 (1990) easmpum af Wenas amedmau fmm mpuanau fur en owinnuner,al assesmet, LEP M27,32 NRC 42 n.2 (1990) enempuma fmn ermnnmanal assesarnent mpuanas; IEPM 34,32 NRC 2% (1990) 10 CTR. 5195(h) envinmmenal isnpset auwman a smirwonnual soview mquitaneras fa ammmissuming, DDM8,32 NRC 471,452 0990) 10 CF.R. $1.101 shernauves under N1.PA releuve to decunmustmung; DDMB,32 NRC 492 OPM7; EIS aquiremas for vertam a der wnnuasum actum DDW8,32 NRC 489 (1990) 10 CFA. 52.79(d) ernergewy gdanrung pnar to facibiy emstructim; DPRM 901,32 NRC 315-16 (1990) 10 CJ R. Pan 53 tramuta d licance staff for defueled operatum mly, DD908, 32 NRC 474, 493 (19%)

10 CFE. Pan 70 amendmas of ernergency $ anmns ame sue requironmia; DNtM Ml,32 NRC 286 (1990) 4 arnagmcy purerwhese repurewasa for posuseum of pluumsum.Ml; LEP 9438, 32 NRC 30 n.9 0990); IEP.90 45,32 NRC 452 n3 0990) 10 CIR. 70.22(eX4) anergency plan or evsktum and dischuure needs for Pu.N!; LEP 9435,32 NRC 2M (1990) gnmnd fee teinporary sur d twensas's uns of (dusoruum, amermum, and nqtumum, LEPM38, 32 NRC 3610990) kwsee enspana Nhty to da; lose isotge: casas of plutonaan; LEP M35,32 NRC 262 (1990) 10 CF R. 70,22(h) sylwakhty of daxxnnuaumma regulatums to puussum of sadsauan in an unsealed fann; iBPW45, 32 NRC 456 0990) 10 CF.R. 70.226) anergency pian w evaluaum and dudmure needs for 14Ml; 1EPW15,32 NRC 2M 0990) ovaluatum of dose effecta ar emersecy plannmg rapuremerts fe auteruns licaue amendmas; IEPM45,32 NRC 455,45'l (1990) 10 CF.R. 70.220)O) ammraa of phamaan for atuch energerry plana are sapired, LEP 9035,32 NRC 20 n.2 09W) 10 CF.R. 70.23(a)O) egnenas and fuilay standards for specul rarlear matenal hcerwes; IEPW30, 32 NRC 94 (1990) standania of pnxectam required u otta2n erecul nudear matenata matenals beenses-LEPM35,32 NRC 263 0990) 10 CF R. 70.25(c) appiscahhty whers aplicauan was filed befas agulaum was muted, IBPm45,32 NRC 459 (1990) 51

~... _ _. -

_ _ _..~

. _. _ = __

!.EG A1, CITATIONS INDEX Re:Gt!LATIONS 10 CFA hn 74. Table A 2 tuuhgkal elfesvowes of pleunium 241; lllP438,32 NRC 363 (1990). IJtP.9M5,32 NRC 452 (l990) 40 C.FA 150114 mle of venian in canaderstums of alutnative to pnmed actaan. Clj 945, 32 NRC 316 (1990) 40 CFA Pan 61 hnuu on nuclear power plara dischages DIk944,32 NRC 43 (19%)

40 C.FA.hn 190 knuu en nuclear power plata dmharges D(19M,32 NRC 45 (1990) 47 CFA 73 901.962 4eflannen and pupone of oneggery bruedese sysum; AtAB-9M,32 NRC 79 (1990) 53

ll.G AL CITATIONS INDEX STATUil5 Auvnw leergy Act lleG), 42 U.S C ( 2014e(2) arFmal of Illmeio sme amene pnigram for agulauon of bypad,act maienal, Clj 9611,32 NRC 3M L1990) defuuum cf bg.nect matenal, CJ 909,32 NRC 212 (1990)

Atmtic l'acrgy Act, 31. 42 U.S C ( 2111 managemers of bypaluct matenal na subpxt to hemams, DPRM 90 2, t' hTC 320, 324 (1990)

Atanic leergy Act,101,42 U.S C.12131 bcomma requironmu for emdat of b>w.prsser tesung, Al ABM, 32 NRC 234 36 0990)

Atonus Emergy Act 108 NRC appewal of hanaes docuim not to operats nuctee' p=a plam, C1J 90s,32 NRC lin (lv90)

Akunne Imergy Act 182a NRC suthonry to ottam fmanctal informatumi fre hcesees, Di'RM 903,32 NkC 330 (19 M))

Atomac Emergy Act, it6(a),42 U.S.C 2236(a) appbcabany to sevacnon of bcesses, ISP426,32 NRC 36 (1990) gn=rds far mva:suon of lumees; ISP 426, 32 NRC 36, 38 (1990)

Atomx faargy Act, ll4c)

NRC appaul of hcenace es:ie:,m not to opente nuclear pense plant, QJ 945,12 NT4 207 (1990)

Atomac lnergy Act,188 NRC approval of hceau decisum nca to openas rmaclear p=n plant, C1J 908, 32 NHC 207 (1990)

Atmus leergy Act, J'f 42 U.S C 4 2239 heanns nahsa,a km power issung; AIAB440,32 NRC 212 (1990)

Aummc Energy Act 159 haanns nghts on changes to cycle 4 pen 6e geramesers ord fd mformatum, IEP423,32 NRC 26 (1990) haanns nghts en km.pwer testeg; A1AB 940,37 NRC 2M35, 2. 809 (1990) 3 Auxnic Faergy Act, 274b, e,42 UIC 2021b, e transfer of NkC regulatory authery to states-Q. -909,32 NRC 212 (IN0)

Atomic l'aergy Act, 2744,42 Uit $ 2021d(2) findmg necessary for transfer of Ccanassum auttu nty to states, C1J 90 9,32 NRC 212,214 (1990)

Atomic Faergy Act,274j,42 U S C {2021)(1)

NRC authonry to suspend or tertmnais agnemanu with states; CU 90 9,32 NRC 212 (1990)

Aussic Facrgy Act, 274o,42 U.S C 6 2021o(2) siale auttumty to adq< siternauve standants for squiatum of byproduct matenal, QJW9,32 NRC 212 (1990)

Asomic Energy Act, 2740,42 U.S C (2021cO)(A) heanns nales on staw implementauan af shernauve segulatime for bypnect awanal; QJ 909,32 NRC 213 (1990)

Wisa:huacats Ovil Defmee Act, St 1930, c. 639, 4 20 obligauen of school isachers to canply wah Ormerms's directives dunng sa emergency; A1All 937,32 NRC 130 (100)

Naumal Envinxwnental Puhey Ac4 42 U.S C 6 4321 rule of reason agenst which envtrorunatal emtenhons are judged A1AH 938,32 NRC 138 (1990) 53

_. -.. - - - -.. ~ -... -. - -....

IIG AI, CITATIONS INDI:X STATVit3 Nauanal lavmweneraal h4wy Act 42 U.S C. 4332(?)(C) considersum of aturnAdvet in GnvifmmelMal impt3 SWlanas, CLJ hl,32 NRC 206 (1990)

Natama! l'avuunmetal i%cy Act,10X2) awmmnunnal revww rapinsness fw defuehng ige. tams; DD 908,3J NkC 478. 482 (1940)

New Yid Pubbe Am%nnus law i1024h(9A 1024 (hkKmney 5tqv 1990) puddhnam m operaum J Shortham by inns Island Ibwer Ashonly; C1J 908,32 NRC 205 (1990)

Sohd Wome Dspaal Act. 42 U,1C. Mol a so; managemere of hypudat maieral em subject to in:ensing. DitM 902, 32 NRC 320 (1990)

l t

l l

I SUlljECI' INDEX ACCIDLAT5.1055 OF C(OLANT adecpeg of rafwauan systern f<

unrnang de pbbc of, DD 904,32 NRC 44 (19%)

See also Chermeiyt Acaders ADJUDICATORY PROGEDIN05 avidabany W informaum, ISP 943(.,32 NRC 267 (1990)

ADVANCID llfli $UITORT PAT 3 TAT 3 i

evemanan of, LEPM44,32 NRC 433 09W)

AGRILMINT See Seulanant Agmement l

AM1A'DMENTS See Maunals tiemas Amartenaus, Openung licane Amerwimesu AMI.RICAN k!'D CR(MS parucirsuon in erne:gecy esernnes, A1AB 941,32 NRC 337 (1990) g AMERICIUM smessats requinne cruersmey plamma; ISPM35,32 NRC 259 (1990)

O declosure of cune eenwru ef, ISP,9MS,32 NRC 449 (1990)

[,

1 APitAL IKMRDS advwny opnions; A1All 9M,32 NRC 73 (1990)

L I

Aitf.ALS r

dienama! for failes to brief issues property; AIAB.942,32 NRC 395 (1990) x er.utlanent of intervennes who have wuhdrawn AIA11934, 32 NRC i (1990) 7 I

fashiy af daisim few purpcme of, AIAB 941,32 NRC 337 (1990)

)

I of dapation of another wervenor's conursime, ALABM2,32 NRC 395 (1990)

ArtiljAtli DiiC1510NS l

sffect of inanedsats ef'atwer. ass revww an; ALAB 937, 32 NTC 135 (19W)

)

affect en hemas authenuuen; AIAB-942,32 NRC 395 (1990)

I AToh0C IMJ10Y ACT coruent d teduncal speci6cauons, ISPN25,32 NRC 21 (1990) heenng nahu m low pomer usuits; AIAn 940,32 NRC 225 (1990)

I I

heanns nahu an opernung twe me arnandment, ISPW25,32 NRC 210990) heaces rights en state suespectic ahernauves to segulaum of b@1 insierul; Clj%9,32 NRC 210 (1990); Cl3 9411,32 NRC 333 (1990)

{

resumed opernike as an abernauve to decomnusaumtng. Clj 904, 32 NRC 201 (1990) i revocation of heaues for pathcoming failures; IJIPW26, 32 NRC 30 (1990)

{

BLAS adpdu:aury tmmrd, peny's dwantantnwns with pnor board nilmgs as beats for claim of, ALAD 9M,32 bRC 75 (1990)

BOARDS See Appeal Boards; licensing B<stds BORATION i

l Inas of ability in mtuce avwles, IEPM12, 32 h1C 181 (1990)

I BllRDEN OF PROOF' to justify waivet of regulatims, ISPM23,32 MtC 1 (1990) i

$5 l

l l

l I

l l

1 i

I l

)

i, r

a f

SUlul:CT INDl3 liYPROMK'T MATERIAL.

staw sundants far agulauan of, OJ 909,32 NRC 210 (1990), QJ 9011,32 NRC 333 (1990)

BYPROtXX'.T MATERIAL 21JON313 cmunent d arg4matums fur, ISP-9030,32 NRC 9$ (19W)

OKMFICATION Ses thrected Corufwatim all:CK YAINLS peevasive maintenance at sembrw&; 10945,32 NRC 109 (1990)

OlERNODYL ACCIDENT emersmcy plannma lauwe teammt. DPkM Mi. 32 NRC 231 (19%)

QVIL PINALTIES ergewdaterwas, ISP 9442,32 NRC 347 (1990); UtP-9443,32 NRC 3W (1990) fue tvineaum notatims; 10947,32 NRC 273 (1990) heanns impest la enxmanderatie of; ISP-9031,32 NRC 107 (1990)

COMMISSION 5es Nuc!aar kegulaiory Camnussum CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APlUCATION wshJawal et, ISP 9437,32 NRC 270 (1990)

QWDNTION3 emesistelay of durrussel of, AIAD 941,32 NRC 337 (1990) based em faawal underpenma in e dacumsre that has bensi eseau.a!)y aguluiad by de suune d thet I

documan, adoussibihty et, AIAR 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) l basu and speci6 cit / seguranenu for adnumma af, ALAB 958,32 NRC 154 (two) A1AB 941,32 l

NRC 337 (1991); A1AB H2,32 NRC 395 (1990) erntrunneraal, rule of sense apptwd m C1J 947,32 NRC L29 (19W)

I monts daarnunathms at admissum suge; AIAD-938,12 NRC 154 (1990, purpose of speancsiy requirernau, ALAB 942,32 NRC 395 (1990) supplemmasum, Sv+(aner test amW to; AIAB 938,32 NRC 154 (19W)

COOLANT See Rectar Coulata l

CORE 5es Rascier Cars CROSS-EXAMINATKIN l

by truervenars; A1AB442,32 NRC 395 (19N))

i DECISIONS I

publuhed, saapicuness of. A1AB 938,32 NRC 154 (1990)

See also Amellaw Dansinru DECOMM13310NINO Ccenrmssue argumst of plan; C1J 948,32 NRC 201 (1990) consularsum of shernauves meer NEPA; DD MS,32 NRC 4/A (1990)

• rowse of; DD 948,32 NRC 4/A (1990) awomes; Ctj 948,32 NRC 29l (1990) runned operauon as ahernaove

• C1J 948,32 NRC 201 (1990)

DECONTAhnNAT10N nsulatory guidance m; AIAB 94132 h7C 395 (1990)

DfRNinONS byproduct materiali C1J 949,32 NRC 210 (1990) funtower licemas; ALAB-94 32 NRC 225 (19W) 1.wpower heense; AIAB 940,32 NRC 223 (1990) enatenal fact lEP444,31 NRC 433 (1990)

DEIVEUNG inmarance aqaremans dunng; DD-948,32 NRC 469 (1990) l u

-. ~..

..- ~ ~.

. - - ~. ~. -

SUlijlXT INill3 Dl}ARTMFNT Ol' 1 ABOR PROCll, DING effect of pendency of, e dis tussel d irnerwruw for changaf euvumniances alasant to standms; IEPM24,12 NRC 12 (1990)

DIRECTED CLKrillCAT10N eMgetmn of panws to sed; AIAB 942, 32 NRC 395 (1990) of mpest for waiver d regulaums, derdal for failure to make prima facw thcolng, IJIP W23, 32 NRC 7 (1990)

Ot3GNERY improper une to flesh cui vague contentrans; AIAll-942,12 NRC 395 0990) of NRC Staff; UIPW43,32 NRC 390 (1990)

Di$MisSAt OF PAK!1ES 6ased en changed circurnstaves relevant to standing; LJIPM)4,32 NRC 12 (1990) for manparucistim a rernanded issuasi AIAB434,32 hvC l (1990) fran aw major segment of a proceahns. effect un tis pennstum in other segmnus, AIAB 9M,32 NRC 1 (1990) uestmat of subsequera subnuasims by d;smissed pny; ALAB 939,32 NRC 163 (IMO) 1XXUMEhT5 inst of istsverse and matsnahty; UIPNM,32 NYC 253 (1990)

EMEROT.NCY BROADCAST SYSTEM anergency esercin ef; AIAB Wl,32 NRC 337 0990) luinnes esponsihthey for rusticauan of; AIAB 9M,32 NRC 75 (1990)

EMIRGENCY EXERCIST,5 start and antincatum eyewm tenung. ALAB Ml: 32 NRC 337 (1990)

Amancan Red Cams panicipatinn in. A!AB HI,32 NkC 337 0990) respnnse parounnel and rescunes to be mntsluaj, AIAB M1,32 NRC 337 (1990) school and related persmnet parucipauan; AIAB-NI,32 NRC 337 (1990) senpo denciency, cure far, AIAB Hl,32 NRC 337 (1990) scop e( 1mgahne insura; AIAB441,32 NRC 337 (1990) stais and local government peruespetum in; AIAB-M1,32 NRC 337 0990) tune tank m; AIAB-*41,32 NRC 337 (1990)

EMERGENCY IJOlff1NO edequacy at Palo %rds, Dn%7,32 NRC 273 (1990)

EMERGENCY NOTil1 CATION See Natificaum EMERGENCY PLANNING adapats prosectne measwes; DISM 941,12 AVC 281 (1990) amenenen panessian requiring; LEPM35,32 NRC 239 (IWO) emusuen of eJvanced hfe suppces psuants; utF9044,32 NRC 433 (1990) 6nal 6ading on swan synern design pnar le tramng board 6ruhns of edeuuacy of, AIAll 941,32 NRC 337 0990) for hcemees to pnemens radiosaive materials in unsealed forrn, IJ1PW27,32 NRC 40 (1990) implemanung pnxedusus ice shahenng mascune; ALAB419,32 NRC 165 (1990) uwpsenation of autial usa 6cauen taparereent; AIAB433,32 NRC 37 0990) lessons learned fuss Chernehyl accidas, DPRMMI,12 hic 281 (1990) pw-^; DPRMMl,32 NRC 281 (1990) pubbe nut:6 cation,,_

AIAB-935,32 NRC 37 09W) regulatory pudence cm amminorugg anl decorsanunstion; AIAB H2,32 NRC 395 (1990) regulatory guidance; AIAB-942,32 NRC 395 (1990) tanchness of alening and notancanon pencesr, ALAB-W2,32 NRC 395 (1990) waght of FEMA news en, CUM 10,32 NRC 218 (1990)

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONES boundanes drawn to cafonn to pohncal pasJicum nther than sinct ra.hus, AIAB-933,32 NRC 57 UMO) 57

-~_

.n SUlijlXT INill3 eatensum af. DPRM MI,32 NRC 281 (19W) padecum of peq4e outside of, DPRM MI,32 NkC 2110940)

LMI*ul;NCY PLANS scraers of amdu;aum and puhhc infarnution nquiremens, AIAB 935,32 NkC 57 (1990) AIAB 9%

32 NRC 75 0990) defictonews in punas, AIAB 941,32 NRC 395 (1990) decropsney betwes.: plan amt imgdomenos pn=ednes as team fa saluost fue usy -d yrsung Im DDM5,32 NRC 100 (1990) evacuanon cmungary awamares, AIAB-H2,32 hVC 395 0990) evawsunn decisku4 respruhhty for, DD944,12 NRC 45 (lWO) fifteen numie madkaum seqarement, A1AD MI,32 NRC 337 09W) fondamasal Asw; AIAB-941,32 NRC 337 09% ALAH N2,12 NkC 395 (1990) moratonns calwity; A1AB H2,32 NRC 395 (1990), [*RM bl 32 NRC 261 (1990) pnxective awaawes savent, AIAB 942,32 NRC 395 (1990) uniny-sponsored, inmunpum of best elforts respeas to. AIAD-94,34 NRC 75 (19W) unlpy-sponsored, natum rule oppbed tot ALAB 931,32 NRC 135 0990) utshiy-sponsared, tesher sole ebenikement and adequcy af. A!AB 937,32 NRC 135 0990)

LM1JtOENCY It!1'AREDNI.55 paw to fust Insang or low power operatums, DPkM M1, 32 NkC 2810990) traines pnvern, d Aciennes la sa basis for star sequest, DD M5,32 NRC 109 0990) utihty fund.cs of local somrnuntry othwu, DPRM MI,32 NRC 28109W)

EMLRGENCY WARNING $YS11iM3 nunementa of, AIAB 935,32 NltC 57 (1990) umma rapiusmesas fa, AIAh 911,32 NRC 57 0990) 1:N10RCEMENT ACTIONS amice and besrms poucodures; AIAB 940,32 NRC 225 (IN0)

ENIORCEMENT PROC 11DINO3 says ef; AIAB-No,32 NRC 225 0990) tersuneum of, hemstng bosni susharuy to swives based im sesdanos egetanov, ISP 9428,3.2 h*C 85 090)

See also Show Came Pnumhngs IJNIRONMENTAL [MPACT STA1LMI;NT

• ~

far defustmg and demafling a mujer facihty, need far, Clj 945,32 NRC 2010990)

ENY!RONMlWTAL REY!EW of deceumsacunng; DDMS,32 NRC 4rv9 (1990)

EQUIPMPRT tagsma and isolanon piecedum at Ses% sdapacy of DD MS,32 NRC 109 (1990)

ESSENTIAL SERYlCE WATER SYSTEM failus to securn todwidant trams to opershic sutus, DD904,32 NRC 195 0990)

EVACUA7 ION adysaced Efe surpas pauass; IJIP-9444,32 NRC 433 (1990) sammgaucy sussurse, AIAB N2,32 NHC 395 (1990) respansitshay for docuumanakms; DDM4,32 NRC 45 0990) schoolduldan and day ess cauers, LDP 9440,32 NRC 376 0990) shadue phenomenm. DPRM 941,32 NRC 2810990) tone bran en; AIAB 942,32 NRC 395 0990)

EVALUA110N speaal populatums; AIAB 941,32 NitC 337 0990)

EVIDENCE not in haarms Ele; (JIP49033,32 NRC 245 (1990) rshance on docunass sus admined inio the seconi, AIAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) 54

.. ~...

.. - ~, _ _ _ _.. -. - -. _-

SUliji:CT INDEX ITSERAL DIEROI.NCY MANAGEMlWT AGENCY completum of fmal fuwtu gs on sinn system design, ALAlt 946,32 NRC 337 (19W) news a maincation requirerturus, AIAB433,32 NRC 57 (19W) weight giwa to wwws on adapacy d emernay plannmg. ClJ M10,32 NHC 218 (19W) llNA!JTY of decisums for purpose of sgyeal; AIAB 941,32 NRC 337 (IPMT) 11NANGAL QUAIJi1 CAT 10NS applabihty to mawrials bcense amenumann, ISPW45,32 NkC 449 (1990) maurial false suiemems m, as bass for remaum of heense; IJIP 9026, 32 NRC 30 (lWo) reinsmemans in operstms beaue hearmge; DPRM M3,32 NkC 326 (19W)

I1NDINGS OF FACT AND CONCI.U5lONS OF LAW en samhet bumvena's cunerniaw; ALAB 942,32 NRC 393 (19W)

IIRE PROTtCi1ON edequacy at 1%1o Verde. DI>S1,32 NRC 273 (1990)-

far bcamaas to romans redanecdvs maurials in unsealed form, ISP 9027,32 NRC 40 (1990) f1RES I! EPA Eher usefulness, thP'9035,32 NRC 259 (1990) plawuun, odepacy d namaras far gehams, thP 9031,32 NRC 3$9 (1990) plutmann, pavenuen af. ISP441,32 NRC 3sc (1990) li)NDINO amargency preparodiums effau by kwal comnardues, DPRM 941, 32 NRC 281 (1990)

O!OVE BOX dreign of; 1.IIPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990) sang 4failuse criurum; LDP 9441,32 NRC 380 (1990)

GROUNDWATUt radmective alsenes to; DDW4,32 NRC 45 (1990)

IIIARINO 11LE inclusim d documans in public documas morn irt; ISPM27,32 NRC 40 (1990) inctum for correlataan of,1EP 9433,32 NRC 24) (1990) presubne afncer's authanty over, IEPM27, $2 NRC 40 (1990)

Staff nepambany far, GP-9433,32 NRC N5 (1990); ISP434, 32 NRC 253 (1990) llEARING REQUEST 3 far recmsulersuan of civil pounty; LEP 9431,32 NRC 107 0990)

IUiARINO RIOlrit hpower issung; AIAB-940,32 NRC 225 (1990) operstag beans amendmaw,12P-9425,32 NRC 21 (1990); LAPW39,32 NRC 364 (1990) suis standards fa segulauen of bypenduct materut, QJM9,32 NRC 210 (IWo); QJMll,32 NRC 333 (1990)

IIEARINOS enfansenent acties; AIAB-940,32 bltC 225 (1990) llEPA FILTER 3 creet in s Ere; IEP-9415,32 bltC 259 (1940)

DOP iesung et,12PW30,32 NRC 95 (1990),13PM33,32 NRC 259 (1990); lllP-9041,32 NRC 380 (1990)

IlUNOIS standants fw insulatim d bypmessa maurul; QJ 969,32 NRC 210 (1990). QJMll,32 NRC 333 (1990)

IMMEDIATE WITCTIVENEss REVIEW effect on appest board decisions; AIAB437,32 NRC 135 (1990) of decuums evennsms operaung lwaus issuance, rapiranent fa; ALAB B4,32 NRC 1 (1990)

(NIORMAL IHOCEEDLNOS nspesibilay to updaw hearing A!s; LBP 9414,32 NRC 253 (1990)

See also Subpest L Proceutmst 59 v

-a

.m m

.. _ -. ~.

SUllJirl' INDIN IN31TTVTE K)R NtK'tfAR IUWl'R OPERATION 5 repris of nuncompliances at Seabad as basis fw mpest fw esiension of stay d qwraurg hcame; 10965,32 NRC 109 0990) 1NSURANCE puques d myemneres for nuclear power giants; Di>948,32 NRC 469 (1990)

IYitRPRl3ATION adapais teateethe measwes; DPRM 941,32 NRC 2sl 09W) score of full.pseticipsum esercise. ALAB Hl. 32 NRC 317 0990)

INIIRVENORS burde et going fwwsal, WIPM43,32 NRC 449 (1990) cnua<aambuuan by; ALAB-N2,32 NRC 395 (1990) durnimal as a pony baand on changel circunstances, LBP 9424,32 NRC 12 (1990) witherson, enullaners W eyeal; ALAB-934,32 hKC l (1990) 1N1LRVENTION emendnweg of peutums; LSP-9429,32 NRt; $9 (1990) in operating license amedmcra procee&ngs, ahonng necessary w enabbeh, ISP 90 29, 32 NRC 89 (1990) organistimal, afMsvit verpuremos to estabhsh, LEPM29,32 NRC 89 (1990) cramratiaial, shamng neccesary fur, IEPM29,32 NRC 89 0990)

JUR15DIC110N amhiplebaard licensing pureeduigs; AIAILW2,32 NRC 395 0990)

UCENSELS resporwihhties for epsetum of a twesed facihty; D(1948,32 NitC 469 (1990)

UCf.NSE3 far possessum of ausmal being cleaned g, DIRM 942,32 NRC 317 0990)

See also Bypeduct Matenals Ucenses; Matenals Uceses; Operaung 1Aenses, Revocatwn et Ocermes; Special Nuclear Maurial, thewas UCEN5!NO BCMRDS authority to appovo seulansas; LBP 9446,32 NRC 443 (1990) authnruy to appovo termmation of anforterners pmceedmg on b. sis of acadernas agraverma; 12PM28,12 NRC 85 090) authority to declam sua apssa iseum; LEP 9432,32 NRC ist (1990) ems in disminatng tascher ade aNmeevnes smuistav ALAll 937,32 NRC 115 0990)

. WOIT!1NO See En=ramey Ushsing MAINIENANCE at Seabnxt, unarproved sedaue41 manuals usai in: DD45,32 NRC 10) (1990) ingerable eqtapnes; D(1948,32 NRC 469 0990)

MANAGEMINT allegatims of problans at Seahn=*; IXh945, 32 NRC 109 0990)

MATERIAL FACT de6nition of; IEPM44,32 NRC 433 0990)

MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT 3 as basis for revocatum of heansa 13PM26,32 NRC 30 0990)

MATERIA!J UQiNSE AMENDMENT ISOCIIDING beanns Als canuens; LBPM33,32 NRC 245 (1990)

MATERIA!J UQiNSE AhENDMINTS l

issuance emns pedancy of a prem=hng; LBPMZl,32 NRC 7 (1999

' MATERIALS UGNSES ddects, surnednes of; ISPM45,32 NitC 449 0990)

MILL TAILINGS ensus distaal; CU 9tk9,32 NRC 210 0990) l l

l i

l -.

... - -,. _ - - -. - ~ -... _...

SUlijirr INI)EX MONTTORINO of seahnd ediviues, pnwrams, and soparvuori, adequacy et, (0905,32 NRC lie (1990)

See also Radmiogical M,uvionna MOTION TO STRJKE Javal of, ISP 90% 32 NRC 267 (1990)

NA110NAL ENY1kONMIXTAL MXJCY ACT casuiersum of shernauves e dwanmustarung: DD948, 32 NRC 469 (1990) anvutemental revww of daxwnnussiurung. DD908,32 NRC 469 (1990) resumed sparstra se an alistnauve to deusnemsamrung; C1J 908,32 NRC 201 (1990) rule of resenn arphed > cmsidersum d rancia and speculative events, AIAll 938,32 NRC 154 (1990) avle of reason opphed to enviroernanal emtaums. C1JW7,32 NRC 129 (1990) sule of season in corsulersuan of shernataves, ClJ 90 8, $2 NRC 201 (1990)

NEl'fUh1UM handhng d; LRPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990)

NO 310NIFICA. T ILAZARDS RFJWT V

signincance d ermes in,12P-9432,32 NRC 181 (1990)

NONCOMPtJANCL5 inkstry serona d, as basis for ra;uest for asternion d stay d SaabnxA opersung bcense, DD 943, 32 NRC 100 (1990)

NOTICE of enforcernas ecuans, AIAB-940,32 NRC 225 (1990)

NUTICE AND COMMENT assessrnas et suo suaspectAc shernauves to regulatum of bypnxiuct matenal, C11969,32 NRC 210 0 990)

NOTIRCATION emergery, cornent of emergewy plan rapirwnaus on; AIAB4%, 32 NRC 75 (1990) emergery, seaban suis apphed kr A1AB 936,32 NRC 75 (1990) 6heen-cunute requirenwu is emersawass; AIAB 941,32 NRC 337 (1990) buerremanon of thrurnas requbenwru; ALAB 935,32 NRC 57 (1990) of puthe d radiologwal emergewy; AIAB 913,32 h1C 57 (1990) tinuluwas of peacess, ALAB H2, 32 h1C 391 (1990)

NRC EMPLDYEES kupiosewuss by: DD90 7,32 NRC 273 (1990)

NRC IN5PECTORS retahation aganist; DD%7,32 NRC 273 (1990)

NRC STAFF ducovery of,12P.9443,32 NRC 390 (1990) responsibahiy for bring Als; 12PW33,32 h1C 245 (1990) swrenalhihty to ordais haanns file in subpart L procemhnas; ISP M34,32 h1tc 253 (19%)

NUCLEAR FOwT.R PLANTS stafhng of planas in dafueled canhtim, DD948,32 NRC 469 (1990)

NUCLEAR REGULATION COMM15510N (MTRCA Tide I auspuihihus; DIMMM 2,32 NRC 317 (1990) audswny to dueen a lacesses to operats a beaus facihay; CLI-948,32 NRC 201 (1990) authenry to dnect a licensee to crasu a hcensed fuihty; DD 908, 32 NRC 469 (1990) concurrence sole in DOE's nonahal pegram DPRM-E2,32 hitC 317 (1990)

NUREGal%

re,hoectivisy rameus; DPRM-941,32 NitC 281 (19%)

Nt REG 0654 eveaasuon caumgency ensasures; AIAB-M2,12 NRC 391 (1990) snorutonng and der-~-: AIAB-N2,32 NRC 395 (1990) spraanorms svecuation outside Tf4 DPRMMI,32 bRC 281 (1990) 68

SUlijECT INDEX NUREO il50 me0aelogia for desermbong Li'l sue, Df'RM 941,32 NRC 251 (1990)

OPLRAUNO UCINSE AMENDMIXf PROL11DINO-stamhng to truertes in; ISP 9029,32 NRC $9 (19%)

OPERARNO UCIWSE AMlWDMIN!1 heating righia en; ISPW39,32 NRC Sfd (1990)

OPLRADNQ UCIN5ti IVOCELDINGS 1

sasum for carmderaum in, ALAB MO,32 NRC 225 0990) j retastatemera of hnancial quah6cathms; DrRM 903,32 NRC 326 (19%)

ruhtigauan of issues in separois phases of same gvmesshng, AIAB 942,32 NRC 395 (1990)

OliRATir40 WCIN5L3 effect of appellaie daeuum en suduruaum fe, ALAB-942,32 NRC 395 (19%)

effect of pnvite agreences en bcensos's vespanihihues; DD 90 8,32 NitC 469 (1990) emergery essreise within 2 yeen of issuance, AIAB 941,32 NRC 3310990)

OPERAMNO ltCEN5ts, IUILPO%1R suthartiy for Avtower insting under; ALAB MO,32 NRC 22$ (1990) daanitim of; A1AB-MO,32 NRC 225 (1990)

OPERATINO UCLNsF3, LDW-lUWER defuutuut d; AIAB-MO,32 NN 225 (19%)

maisnality to fepower beer.ne, A1AB N0,32 NRC 225 (1990) sundaal for g> ant of, A1AB MO,32 NRC 225 (1990)

OPERATIONS, LOW FOWER emergency swepare,hiesa requiremerus, DPRMWl,32 NRC 2110990)

Of1NIONS advisory, rehance m remnanmg d, ALAB136, 32 NRC 75 (1990)

PART M UCENSE discloswa of phaenmm Ni and americium, ISP-90 45,32 NRC 449 0990)

PLNALTIES Ses Ovtl Penaltwa PLPLNO at Seahrook, snateral cmdne d, DD905,32 NRC 109 0990) s

~

ltLTIONIUM bandhng of; ISPM30,32 NRC 95 (1990) isciopea, accounung fa, ISPM35,32 NRC 259 0990), ISP 9441,31 NRC 3g0 0990)

PLLTTONIUM 241 disclueure et suno earment of, LSP 9445,32 NRC 449 (1990) dalosure of beensed amaume ISPM38,32 NRC 359 0990) anergewy plaa 7,-- -- --- far pcsaassian of, ISPW38, 32 NRC 359 (1990) wlauwe bookisical effectiveness; ISPM45,32 NRC 449 0990)

PRESIDLNO O(11CER aethanry over beanna Als ISP-9027,32 NRC 40 (1990)

IV00F Sa, Durden of Pmaf litOTECTIVE ACTIONS range c(, for ermorgecy plaroung; AIAB-942,32 NRC 395 0990)

PUBtJC DOCUMLNT ROOM inclusi<a et documers fran, in haanns Als of Sulpert pmscedag; ISPN27,32 NRC 40 09W)

QUALITY ASS'.7 RANG viniatkms, raymmg a secord on, AIAD-MO,32 NRC 225 0990)

RADIOACTIVE RHJASE3 annasphesie vedag of oressung ernisaans, DD944,32 NRC 45 0990) eeniauunent of 6 mum gases dunng radwdog cal emegency; DD944,32 NRC 45 (1990) 62 l

(

=

.~

.. _ _ ~ _

.... ~ _.. ~. - -. -.

SUlijECT INDl3 to gmmdwour DD904,12 NRC 45 (1990) unmcapsulated radnmchdas, ISP 9035, 32 NRC 259 (1990), ISP441,32 NRC 380 (1990)

RADIOACTIVI!Y runaut, IMitM 941,32 NRC 251 (1990)

RADIOliK11 CAL MONITORINO capacity required in emersecy pieung; ALAB N2, 32 NRJ 395 (1990) reguhwry guidarna m; A1AB-942,32 NRC 395 (1990) independent systems opersied by kwal conummues DPRM M1,32 NRC 281 (1990)

RADIONUC11DLS unencapsulaiad, akane of; LEPM35,32 NRC 259 (1990); ISP-9041,32 NkC 380 (1990)

REACTOR CLA%AhT kup, ouuse tue, ISP 9432,12 NRC 181 (lWU)

REACTt* CORE sycleapedEe operaung kmiis; 1.11P 90 31,32 NRC 368 (1990)

REACTOR OftRA110N eyckspoins parameter laants; IEP439,32 NRC 364 (1940)

REAll5M RL12 anhabihty to taucher s4e abamlarunmit ALAB-937,32 NRC 135 (1990) sp4 canon to gewanergency conduct of suu ami kwal governmema, ALAB-937,12 NRC 135 (1990)

RECLPT10N QATLR5 scovsum for emergency esercwes; ALABHl 32 NRC 337 (1990)

RECONSIDLRATION chbgauan of panas concemns requests for. ALAB 942,32 NRC 395 (19W)

RECORD See Reopaung a Raurd RED CROSS See Amancan Red Cines REGULA110N3 ca9 ance enth segulatory guides as presumpave ovulence of canpliance wWi, LEP 9430,32 h1C 95 h

(1990) effzuw date; ISP445,32 NRC 449 (1990) kinirance sequiraneras for macseas power plania; DD944,32 NRC 469 (1990) interpanation of 10 CJ.R. 5047(st DlitMWl,32 FRC 251 (1W) interpresatum of 10 C.P.R. 32.79(0, DPRM 941,32 NRC 711 (1990) truerpresauon of 10 CJ R. Part 40; DPRM 942,32 NRC 317 (1990) insarpasauan of 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appenda E; AtAB 941,32 NRC 337 (1990) interpretataan of Part 50, Aprendia gualano, m warmas synems; A1AB435,32 NRC 57 (1990) waiver of, burden of prad to jueufy; 13PW23,32 NRC 7 (1990) waiver of, prims facw shmnng satiated for grens of, LEPM23,32 NRC 7 (1990)

See also Rules of Practwo REOULATORY OUIDANCE comphance with as pusumpive svulence of comphance wWs naulatims, LEPW30,32 NRC 95 (1990) emersawy planrang; ALAD442,32 NRC 395 (1990) anergency planams sans size; DPRM 941,32 NRC 281 (1990) anautonna and decrunaminakss; A1AB-M2,32 NRC 395 (1990) more danandmg than regulaums; AIAB 935,32 NRC 57 (1990) signiAcara contanunants; 1APM45,32 NRC 449 (1990)

REL',11YE BlotDOICAL EllliCI1VENL35 plutmiurn 241; LEPM45,32 NRC 449 (1990) phamiurn-Ml; IBPM38,32 NRC 359 (1990)

REMANDED IS30T3 appeal righas of intervent who fails to participata on; AIAB-9M,32 NRC 1 (1990) 63

- -. -.- _-. - - ~. _, -

SUllJi'CT INI)l'X REOIT.NING A kirORD lituden en mensm, ALAB 94 32 NRC 73 (1940), A1All Ho,32 NRC 225 (1990), CLJ 410, 32 NRC 218 09%)

critens foi; AIAB 9% 3J NRC 75 0990), ALAB 940,32 NRC 225 0990) quahty asstarance vadaums; ALAll 944 32 NRC 225 (19W) satisfacten of sm;uimnants; AIAll NO,32 NRC 225 09W), OJ 9410,32 NkC 218 0990) signtficani safety issue, CtJ 9410,32 NRC 218 (1990) ALAh 940,12 NRC 225 0990) timelmou, C1J-9010,32 NRC 218 0990) tamebness ennaularatims whers mouce does not s&iress angn>6 cant safeny or enytasunental hasues; ALAB4% 32 NRC 75 0990)

REVll*W 5eo lavsmnmenul Review; tmmafism 1.ffectinness Review REVOCA110N OF IJCEN5ES for postheenaing failures; tilP 9026,32 NRC 30 0990)

RIAJ3tAKINO appnynswnees for deshng with &nanct.1 problems of irshvidual lu-ensees; DPRM 90-3,32 NRC 326 0 990)

PUID OF PRACI1CE admissiNhty d catawima based en factual unJ.-,

3 an a docwnent that has linen e=senuaty repwfuted by ow sourve of that document, ALAB 938,32 NRC 154 0990) ammmtmess of traervenuun peuums, ISP 9tk29,32 NRC 89 (1990) appealakhty of danweal of eesuaiums; AIAB 941,32 NRC 337 0990) appellaw deemmns armi leceae suduuustum; A1AB 942,32 NRC 395 0990) basis and spectadry rapansnaus for aermasma of einemums, A1AB 938,32 NRC 154 ON0),

A1AB 941,32 NRC 337 (1940y, ALAB-H2,32 NRC 395 0990) burden of pmot to justify waiva of : Sulatens; ISP 9023,12 NRC 7 0990) burdai e imerwsuus seebog hcewe rewauesu 1RP 9tk45,32 NRC 449 0990) carnpleimuss of pihtuhed decisians; AIAB438,32 NRC 154 0990) compteuan of Iwaing Ale; IJtP-9033,32 NRC 245 (1990) cnterts for reopoung 4 mad, AIAB-HO,32 NRC 225 0990) enss<saminanen by truervennes; ALAB-94132 NRC 395 0990) directed ceruacetant; ALAB.942,32 NRC 395 0990) durnissal of appal for failus to bnet issues gewenty, A1AB H2,32 hRC 395 0990) danissal of ersanisatimal irmarwner based en changed simannances, LEP-9434,32 NRC 12 0990) danissal of partws; AIAB 939,32 NRC 165 0990) effect of dwaissal of party frten ene major orgmers d a pmcesang cm tu perucipatian in other segmmas; A1AB.934,32 NRC 1 (1990) anergency anarcise conser6se; A1AB-M1,32 NRC 337 0990) evidence not in hasnns Als in Suhpri L,. ' as; ISP 9t>33,32 NRC 3410990)

Averactor test s:T ed to surplementation of emsenums; AIAB438,32 NRC 154 0990) h heanns siglas as grond for waiver of to C.F.R.112f502 LBP 9423,32 NRC 7 (1990) unma,hese e5ectiveness review, offect on appeal board dacts.mr, ALAB-937,32 NRC 05 0990) intervenum by a gamp or er8orazatim, showing assessary far, IEP 9429,32 NRC 89 09M))

bcesang bosni authmty to appnwe termmation of ontoecemos pmceedmg on basis of settiemers agmuners; IRPi9428,32 NRC 85 (190)

RGiue rule; LRA9434,32 NRC 253 0990); 12P-9436,32 NPC 267 0990) ments determmations at conteuinn admissaan suge; A1AB 938,32 NRC l$4 0990) amloplarboard pmceed,ngr, AIAB-H2,32 NRC 393 0990) obligatmn of party to saquest seconsideratim of tuhng; ALAB-942. 32 NRC 395 0990) parucipataan in other pmceedess as bans far standuig to intervene; IEP-9429, 32 NRC 89 (1990) purpose d spect5cany requtrement f<r erraernmns; AIAB 942,32 NRC 395 (1990) rahance en doctanents nas adntitted into d e reconi; AIAB 937,32 NRC 135 (1990) ruhtigatim of laaues in separais gheses of same pracocefms; AIAB 942,32 NRC 395 0990)

~

M

l SUlullT INillW rernmlwd of twense defms m hfurmal pmceedmss. ISP 9M3,32 NRC M9 0990) rapasms a ward, bwden a sponsors of ausum, A1Ah 936,32 NRC 75 0990) angimess a senmi, enwns far, ALAB 936,32 NRC 75 0990k C1J 9410,32 NRC 218 (1990) responsiMuss a perues,13PM36,32 NRC 267 (1990) saussnas of pouceedman. LSP,9446,32 NRC 463 (1990) showmg netosary w esiahhsh stand,ng 6n egersung twenas snusutmers prmoedmad, LSP M29,32

{

NRC 19 (1990)

$uff respeaitmhty to update heanng (de in Sutgun L pweedngs, UtP M34,32 NRC 253 (199tT) l sundes to intervens k worstang twmas amendmaru proemhns. ISPM29,32 NRC 89 0990) sua spwus e&gtum cf issues of danussed truevenar, LEPM34,32 NRC 12 09W)

SuMest L, auuumty to Lasue tempuury suy; ISP430,32 NRC 95 0990)

Sutgart 1, hearing fue, incluaum of diwurrents in pbhc docunwes rtuss in, ISPW27, 32 NRC 40 0 990)

Sutq=st 1, preedmg effwer's sattunity over hearms f,le; ISP 9427,32 NRC 40 0990) sumnwy dupeum of pleadmas; LSPM26,32 NRC 30 (1990); LSP M44,32 NRC 413 (1990) tornywary stay; ISPM3$,32 NRC 259 0990), ISPN38,32 NRC 359 0990), LEPW41,32 NRC 380 0 990) tunehness consulessuans whets mnuen to tenpen does ma addras sigmficant safety or enstrunnuntal I

imuss; AIAB 936,32 NRC 73 (1990) vah&ty of twense, denwestratum ef; 1RPW45,32 NRC 449 0990)

WETY 155U13 sogening a seconi; A1 AIL 940,32 NRC 225 0990) ClJM10,32 NRC 218 (1990)

SANCTION 5 dumfanal of inservenar for namparunpauan on romanded issuu, AIAB 934, 32 NRC l 0990)

SCllOOL 'IEACl!ERS reshan nine embed io; AIAl0937,32 NRC 135 0990) vale abandenrnent dunna rsdudogical ene:gennes, twensmg board erns in damtsaal of sentenuam im.

ALAR 417,32 NRC 135 0990)

SETI1EMI'NT Acaf2MIXr as beau tw terminatkm d enfurecunmi petwee hng; ISPM28,32 NMC 85 090) bcenabs based swhwity to synwo; IEPM4 32 NitC 463 0990)

Sill 111dRINO g psocedesse far A1AB 939,32 NRC 163 (1990) 8110W CAU5E PROCTI. DINGS bcenens baani authority to appaws actthunent et ISPM4 32 Nit 0 463 (1990) scope af, DD947,12 NRC 273 0990) j standani for inst.mawm of; DDM7, 32 NRC 773 (1990)

See also Entcscemas Pmceedings SINGLPel-AttERE CRffERlON

- glow, bases; 13P 9041,32 NRC 350 0990)

SIREN A11RTING SY31EM energency saamas d; A1AB-941,32 NitC 337 0990)

SPECIAL NUC12AR MATERIAIS ucumtbg fer, 137 9435,32 NRC 259 0990) surie consors d; 13P 90 35,32 NRC 259 0990) dis lomas of heensed sincurar,ISPM38,32 NRC 359 0990x LSP90-45,32 NRC 449 0990) anessency plan req,

ISPM35,32 NRC 259 09901 IEPM34,32 NRC 359 0990) enesency planrang or 6se provernian; LEP-90 27,32 NRC 40 ONU) 3PECIAL NUC11AR MATERIAL 3 UCENSES consors e( embestums far, ' EPM 30,32 NRC 95 (1990) issuance duaists pedancy of gwal answert1s twe;12PMD,32 NRC 7 0990)

SPENT RJEL STORAGE insurance sequunnans for Da906,12 NRC 469 (19H))

65

SUllJirT INDIT lilANDlNO disaeiuviary, 6 sat far, thPW24,32 kkC 12 (19%9 fertinstwn in inhar pmadese as bus fx ISP m29,32 NRC 59 (190) stall. AND LOCAL (KW1ItNMINil partmpetae in energency ennuses. ALAll Hl. 32 NRC 337 (19M0 5 FAY of operstmg lawns, discrepncy beinem ernergmcy gaan and onwrgiswy plan kngdenenung geweduru es hose fa vapest for,10 M3,32 NRC IW (1990) of eterstag twense, lea of employes kneelede of jnb doenyans,s as beim far rmguest fur, l'O M 3, 32 NRC 100 (1990) risM to reply ki, IBP M 38,32 NRC 339 (19W) eistess on the ensrus, IJ4P.M 31,12 NRC 239 (19%D tamparsry, ISP 9033,32 hkC 259 (19Wy, ISP 9441, 32 NRC 350 (19W9 km.parery, eushanty to tasue ISP %)D,32 NkC 93 (19W9 SUA SKWil. IS5tfl3 edrymm af issues of dientased weervermw es, lJIP M24,12 NRC 12 (IWU) linners board sahmuy to daaste, LAP 9432, 32 NkC 181 (19W)

$Ulil%Irf L f*01LDINUS runedied of licanas defes, IJIP M4%, 32 NRC 449 (1990) be siso infirmal Pwusedmp

$UMMARY LH&1U$ft10N lautausuu :m one of, ISPW 26, 32 NRC 30 (19HT) standssd fur, ISFS44, 32 NRC 433 (19m)

$URVijllANCI'.

Weisende eywnssa Di> 90 8,32 NRC 469 (19mD 11.OINICAL 511rtl1 CATIONS aDegatuma of vudatum of, st 1%:ty plata, DD946,12 NRC 193 (19*3 emawknare et, ISP 90 29, 32 NRC 49 (1990) sknp in snude seductum recuremert,, IJtP M32,32 h*C 181 (19W) surses et, IAPw25,32 NRC 21 (1990) mnnval af episkoperd,4 erve opereur.g knute, IJIP M39,32 NkC M4 (19W)

T1571NO liffA 61 tars. IJiF9433,32 NRC 259 (19W412P M41,32 NRC 350 (1990) be p=er, os a prenadame to grais af a fuu peer lawma, AIAll 940, 32 NkC 225 (19%h k= power, mesJ few lumns for. ALAR 940,32 NRC 225 (19mD k= p=w, pwpme id, ALAB M0, 32 h*C 223 (19%n UNKLSOIAT.D 1. WTY ISSUI.S defusied saxlear g%, 10908,32 NRC 469 (1990)

UILANIUM MILL TA, INGS nuanas far passear of sostanal bema clastwd me, DISM M2, 32 NRC 311 (19W1)

URANIUM MILL TAllJNOS ILADIAT10N CCNTROL ACT asnyhame with IPA sagdsthem; DitM M2,12 NRC 317 (1990) luonae be pesensum of innsnal teing cirenad wp,1 PRM M2,32 NRC 317 (lWI) rwru(.auon of wantiy pneerues, IM*M 902, 32 NRC 317 (1990)

Title I pngrarn; IWitM 902,12 NRC 317 (1990)

L7111111.3 fundes it emergency preparednes effuna by kwel sanmurutus, De*M el,32 Nke 231 (1990)

VALY13 See Ch4 Valws VIOLATK)NS an6-

~ GI Penaliy; ISP 9042,32 NRC 381 (19V0, ISP M43,32 NitC 390 (1990) couwuve classifketum of Severup lavsla !Y and V as Sewruy Ims! Ill,12AM42,32 NRC 387 (1990), lJiP M43, 32 NRC 390 (1990) 66

Sl'iljlrr INDEX emergary h4Nug and im ranawm at h'M12. DD W 7,32 NRC 273 (IWO) gushty seawams ALAll 94),32 NRC 225 (IWO)

WA!Yl.R of nguisens, harden of peut to Mary; 13PMII,32 NitC 1 (1b+0) of ngulinans, pims fane skwww wered for gran 4 ISPW11,32 NRC 1 (1990) i l

t I

i 61 l

1-t

.5

FACil.lTY INill3 l

l CAkkOLL CotNTY NtC1J AR $1 A110N, Ilmts I and 2, Ikda Ne $0 599-15R, 50 &ol3R CONilRtrnON M RMTT %Tn!DRAWAl4 (hde 31,1990, OR!tR AITROVINO

%T!llDRAWAL AND T1.RMINAT1NO PkOC111NNO, (JIP M37,32 NRC 270 (1990) l PALO YlJtDE NUCllAR OI.NI AA11NO $TATION, Unun 1, 2, and L thda Na. % 371,50 529,

$0 S W B1QUl.5T M* ACl10N, (kWw 31,1994 PARt!AL IHRI.CIOR'S DICliKIN UNDI R 10

(

CJ A i1.2(% Idi90 7,32 NRC 273 0940)

PiARY NtlClJAR POWS k Pl ANT, Un641; thdas Na M440 kl.Qtfl3T KIR ACTION, $splan.hs, 23,1990, DlklCit*'5 DIC15lON l'N!th 10 C.l' R t

6 2.36, DDM6,32 NRC 191 (1990)

M RRY NUCllAR MMR MANT, Usui 1; thann Na M440 0lA 2 OPIAATtNO ljCl.NSL AMLNDMINT; Jt.ly 23,19m, M1393RANDtfM AND ORDI R (Iktiyms

&mfre and Lkwees's Raams fur Romme.deester:4 (JIP M25,32 NkC 21 (19w) g OPIAATINO IJCLNSL AMt.NOMINT, Novanta I,1990, INrlML DirlsloN (Agpovmg thenas Anunenant), LJIP 9039,12 NRC 368 0990)

QUAD LT111.3 NUCllAR M)WIA ET ATION, thana Na $0234 OM, 50 263 OM I

IWK*Cl. MIN!; Aupa 1,1990, MIM*ANDUM AND ORDt* (A rmweg Soul.mevs P

Agreement and Tornanatana Pnamdmge), IJIP 9028,32 NRC $$ (1990)

St.ABROOK 8t AT10N, Det li Inda Na 3044) l Rl!QL,TJT M* AC110N, Autum $1,19W4 IMRII'TI**3 Dirl510N UN!MA 10 CLR 4 2 3%

DDM4,32 NRC 43 (1990t IOM$. 32 NRC lle !!990) 5 EIADROOK $1 AllON, Unus I and 2, lhdas Nns SO441 OL. $04440L I

OPI AATM) 1]CI.N50, Jaly 9,192, DIC15 KIN, AIAH 914,32 NkC 1 (1990)

OrtRATINO IJCINSF,, Appet 20,1990, lHC15K)N, ALAB 935,32 NkC 37 OMO)

OPIAA11NO ljCLNSE; Angua 20,1990, DIC15 KIN, ALAH 916,32 NRC 75 (1990) i OPIRAT1NO IJLLNSI.; $spasmher II,19WK DIfl510N, AIAB 937,32 NkC 1310990)

(M'lAAllNO IKI.NSL, &simente 28,1990, MI MORANDUM AND ORIMA ki: oak!MNO l

kIJ1.RRLD QUI.5110NS, ALAB 939, $2 NkC 163 0990)

OPIAATINO 1X'LN5L Om4er 26,1990. ORDL% CLJ M10,32 NRC 218 0990)

OPI AA1TNG (JCLNSE, Novenhar 21,1990, Dir2110N, AIAH 941,12 NRC 337 CWO)

OPIAATINO IJCLN5tL Ikemta 21, 1994 DICISION, ALAB 942,12 NRC 395 (1990)

SLABROOK STAT 10N, Umis I and 2. Ihda Nm 50443 4 1, 50444 01,1 OPIAATtNO IJCLN5L Onder 18, 1994 MIMORANDUM AND ORDI.R. AIAll MO,32 NRC 225 (1990)

$FAllROOK 8TATION, Umis I sad 2, Ikuhat Nm M443 O! R,30444%R OMAATTNO ly'LNSE RLMAND, Ikondier 18, 1990, MIMORANDUM AND ORDIA (Sednary Dupimuum hm), IJIP 9044,32 NRC 433 0990) 5tAllROOK STATION, Umts I and 2, Inds: Na 3044301 A 4, 50444 OI A 3 i

OPIAATTNG IJCLNSE RIMAND, Neher 7,19M, MIMORANDUM AND ORDI R (thepuyt lacensee's Matuut fer Sunenary Ikpmtsan of luuse Renatuled la AIAll 93D, IJIP 90-40, 32 NRC 376 (1990) i 49 l

l

_.._. _ _.~___ -._.--__ _ _ m

.__m.

.m.m.m._

-- -. c, w e

d i

l'ACIL11T INDl;X ElR*1 RAM NUCli,AR IUWla $1AT10N. Unna 1, thdet No $3322 OPIAATLNO (JCIN5ft AMINDMt.hi, (hem 17,19% Mt.hKWANDt!M AND (*[)la, CtJ 908,32 NRC 2010M0)

RLQlfl3T R* ACTION tkwnhar 20,19% IERI.Cf(*'8 DI.(1510N UNtu k 10 CJ iL 6254, DD908,32 NRC M4 09W) i n'RKl:V KilNT NUCLJAR OtW11ATl*) MANT, Una ) and 4, thdas Nas M224stA $.

$o 2314)tA.5 OPIAATtNO tJCIN5E AMINDMINT; My ll,19% MIM* ANTRUM AND ORDt.R (M<ake to tha* Lao, IJIP-90 24,32 NRC 12 09W)

OrtAATING IJctW5E AMrRDMFNT; Sepamher 23. 1990 MI.MORANLt!M AND ORDI.k (Caederstam of l\\e:No Sua $ prae tasumo, IJIP 9032. 32 NRC 181 (19901 YlAM(WT TANK 12 NUCtJ.Ak IUWlR ITATION, indet No $G2714.11A OPIRATINO LJCENSE AktLNDMINT; &aptand.se 21,19% MLMORANDUM AND ORIE R, i

(3JM7, SJ NkC 129 (19e0) 1JCENSE AMINDMlWT; Seraamber 21,1990, N011G; ALAll 938,32 NkC l$4 09+0)

V(Xfn2 l'.1frTRIC OINIAA11NG MAW, Unm I and 2, ikdat Nie $4424 O( A, SS4234)[ A OPLRATINO ljCLNSE AMENDMINT; Auguel 16,19% Mt.MORANDUM AND ORDIR (iniarvosam Peutkek taPW29,32 NRC 19 (19*f) l

)

19

.