ML20072H533

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Schedule for Feb 1983 Commitments Re Design Criteria in Srp.No Further Change Necessary W/Exception of FSAR Conformance Review Table 1.8-3
ML20072H533
Person / Time
Site: Satsop
Issue date: 03/23/1983
From: Bouchey G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0800, RTR-NUREG-800 GO3-83-240, NUDOCS 8303290465
Download: ML20072H533 (3)


Text

Y Washington Public Power Supply System Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541 (206)482-4428 Docket No. 50-508 March 23, 1983 G03-83-240 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Mr. G. W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Subject:

NUCLEAR PROJECT 3 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON CONFORMANCE OF WNP-3 TO STANDARD REVIEW PLAN (February 1983)

Reference:

a) Letter #G03-82-1015, G. D. Bouchey to J. D. Kerrigan, dated October 6, 1982.

J Reference a) transmitted amendment #1 to the WNP-3 FSAR. Tnis amendment con-tained the initial phase of the WNP-3 Review for conformance with the Stan-dard Review Plan-(SRP) NUREG-0800, required by 10CFR50.34(g).

In those cases where differences between the WNP-3 design criteria and the SRP acceptance criteria were identified in the initial Supply System review, e schedule was provided detailing when the bases would be presented for con-cluding that the WNP-3 design criteria are in compliance with the Commission Regulations.

Presented herewith is the material for which commitments were made for the month of February. Included are marked up FSAR pages to show the changes which will be incorporated into a subsequent amendment.

In those cases where exception is taken to the SRP acceptance' criteria a reference is provided to the FSAR section where further information is provided.

If necessary, addi-tional infonnation will be added to the appropriate FSAR section indicated on the marked up FSAR pages.

OhK Obbo!$8 A

PDR i

~.

i

+7 Mr.-G. W. Knighton

-Page 2 March 23, 1983 G03-83-240 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON CONFORMANCE OF WNP-3 TO STANDARD REVIEW PLAN (February 1983)

In certain instances, following a detailed review, we have been able to con-clude based on information presented in the FSAR that the WNP-3 design cri-teria do, in fact,. conform to the SRP acceptance criteria. For these cases, with the exception of a change to the FSAR conformance review table (Table 1.8-3), no further change will be necessary.

If you require further information for clarification, the Supply System point of contact for this matter is Mr. K. W. Cook, Licensing Project Manager (206/482-4428 ext. 4536).

. Sincerely, ww 3

e G. D. Bouchey, Manager-Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Programs AJM/ss Attachments:

cc:

D. J. Chin - Ebasco NY0 N. S. Reynolds - D&L E. F. Beckett - NPI-J. A. Adams - NESCO l

0. Smithpeter - BPA A. A. Tuzes - CE A. Vietti - NRC Ebarco - Elma l

WNP-3 Files - Richland

(-

f

e e

WN P-3 FSAR TABLE 1.8-3 N1?rC - 0800 trPC STAWAPD REvf EV PL AN cow?LYAFE Y' S W N'A FU APKS SRP'ACCFP*ANCE CPITTPTA 9.5.1 fire Protection Program Red. 3 - July 1981 R CEPTANCE *2!TERIA The applicant's fire crotection pregram is acceptable i' it is in accordance with the following criteria:

<nv..,...

m u-_-

- u,e e 1 a.w 13 C/R Part 53 $53.48, and General Design Criterion 3, as related to fire x see Res rk 0) 0)

rts.rt t ca._

e.pta.e.. crit.r s sa.es tse4 1'

this SKF,the-basador-s.oncludtr.gMat_the hsNP pre,ention, the design and operation of fire detectier and protection systems and administrative controls proviced to protect safety-related

.de tsucriteria. ara _tosanpttance witA th..camnises.e4 structu*es, systems, and corpo,ents of the reactor facility.

.res4ationowil.1.ba.providei by.r brary 198h-x see Remark (2)

(2) there are no sharea safety-related structue.., system.

General Design Criterton 5, as related to fire protection for shared

,, co,pon,,,,,, ap 3, 2

safety-related structures, systems, and components to assure the aoitity to perform their intended safety function.

The following specific criteria provide information, recommendations, and

[

/-

f guidance and in general describe a basis acceptab1e to the staff that may be c(LS/ ss MM-3 e,s 44' f,.

i used to meet the requirements of $53.48, GCC 3 ana 5:

@dl#5M "['*d5 [ f[il /Cf /88/8 mho f Branch Technical Position (BTP) CMEB 9.5-1 as it relates to the x see Remara (1) q a.

design provisions given to ir.plement the fire protection program.

0[/DCfd6D.g a#u[d(((g/td

.5-/

~

Regulatory Guide 1.78 as it relates to habitable areas such as the x

b.

control room and to the use of specific fire extinguishing agents.

bb M 4 ad'x R cw /uJ,w * ![ 3,y w

g4 tory Guide 1.101, as (t relates to fire protection emergency x

c.

u

//

Y*44nd.w.y/k 9.5.2 C m:anication Systems Rev. 2 - July 1981 g j.

'} 9 w p

-,-n e m m 7

m*

,,,t,., th. oe.,q,o, the _ ic.ti. s,ste...s d.sc,.oed. t,.

5 aCpIICant's safety analysis report (SAR). is base 3 in part on the degree of W

1se O

\\

l 1

-