ML20072G803
| ML20072G803 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1994 |
| From: | HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20072G793 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9408250100 | |
| Download: ML20072G803 (5) | |
Text
i ATTACHMENT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNIT 2 CYCLE 4 STARTUP TESTING
SUMMARY
REPORT
)
l l
9408250100 94081'7 PDR ADOCK 05000499 p
PDR MISC-94\\94 220.001
l South Texas Project Unit 2 Cycle 4 Attachment Low Power Physics Testing Page 1 of 4 1.
CRITICAL BORON CONCENTRATIONS (PPM):
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
ISO ppm il5% of Delta (19 ppm)
Acceptance Criteria (AC):
i1000 pcm (140 ppm)
Predicted Measured (M-P)
Pass / Fail Pass / Fail (P)
(M) ppm DRC AC ARO 1805 1766.1
-38.9 P
P CBC-in 1675 1646.4
-28.6 P
130 119.7
-10.3 P
(ARO - BC-in) 11.
ROD WORTil MEASUREMENTS (Rod Swap Method Used):
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
Reference Bank (CBC) within 10% of predicted Other banks within 15% or 100 pcm (whichever is greater)
Total s 110% of predicted Acceptance Criteria (AC):
Reference Bank (CBC) within 15% of predicted Other banks within 30% or 200 pcm (whichever is greater)
Total 2 90% of Predicted Predicted Measured Delta Percent Pass / Fail Pass / Fail RCCA Bank Worth Worth (M-P)
(pcm)
(pcm)
(pcm)
(%)
i Control A 757 709.1
-47.9
-6.3 P
P Control B 758 733.9 25.9 3.4 P
P Control C 871 855.3
-15.7
-1.8 P
P Control D 498 477.2
-20.8
-4.2 P
P Shutdown A 324 342.9 18.9 5.8 P
P Shutdown B 714 679.1
-34.9
-4.9 P
P Shutdown C 418 425.5 7.5 1.8 P
P Shutdown D 419 422.9 3.9 0.9 P
P Shutdown E 336 299.0
-37.0
-11.0 P
P Total 5095 4994.9
-100.1
-2.0 P
P ARO: All Rods Out CBC: Control Bank C Percent Difference = 100 x (M - P) / P MISE.94\\94-220.001
South Texas Project Unit 2 Cycle 4 Attachment Low Power Physics Testing Page 2 of 4 III.
DIFFERENTIAL BORON WORTII(PCM/ PPM):
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
il5%
Acceptance Criteria (AC):
none Percent Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Predicted Measured Difference DRC AC
-7.15
-7.15 0.0%
P IV.
ARO ISOTilERMAL TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (ITC)(PCM/ F):
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
3 pcm/ F Acceptance Criteria (AC):
none PassNail Pass / Fail Predicted Measured Error (M-P)
-3.3
-3.34
-0.04 P
V.
INFERRED ARO MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (PCM/ F)*-
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
none Acceptance Criteria (AC):
< 0 pcm/ F, or rod withdrawal limits established Pass /I all Pass / Fail Predicted Measured Adjusted
-1.4
-1.44
-0.64 *
- P Inferred MTC is obtained by subtracting the Doppler Temperature Coefficient (-1.9 pcm/ F) from the Isothermal Temperature Coefficient.
Adjusted MTC includes measurement uncertainty and IFBA correction.
MISC-94L94 220 001
r-l South Texas Project Unit 2 Cycle 4 Attachment Power Ascension Testing Page 3 of 4 l
VI.
POWER DISTRIBUTION MFASUREMENTS:
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
Incore Tilt (based on F-Delta-H) s 1.02 Reaction Rate Errors < 10 %
Acceptance Criteria (AC):
FDlIN < Technical Specification (TS) 3.2.3 Limit F s TS 3.2.2 Limit xy Largest Unrodded Reactor incore Quadrant Highest FDHN Limiting Limit Rea,on Power Power Tilts FDHN Limit F
xy xy Error (%)
1.ow Power 1.0037 0.9990 1.5023 1.7700 1.7051 1.9315 12.0*
(29.2%)
1.0024 0.9949 Intermediate 1.0050 0.9986 Power 1.4792 1.693 1.6755 1.8724 11.4*
(46.7%)
1.0029
.9935 Intermediate 1.0076 0.9938 Power 1.4371 1.557 1.6280 1.7673 6.5 (77.7%)
1.0002 0.9985 1:ull Power l.0050 0.9976 1.4051 1.4600 1.5881 1.6921 6.7 (l00.0%)
1.0025 0.9950 FDilN: Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor Core periphery location wsemnno ms
South Texas Project Unit 2 Cycle 4 Attachment Power Ascension Testing Page 4 of 4 Vll.
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM FLOW MEASUREMENT (GPM):
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
none Acceptance Criteria (AC):
> 395,000 gpm Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Reactor Power Measured Flow DRC AC 70.8 %
406,658 P
99.3 %
404,955 P
Vill. FULL POWER CRITICAL BORON (PPM);
Design Review Criteria (DRC):
50 ppm Acceptance Criteria (AC):
11000 pcm (145 ppm)
Burnup Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Predicted Measured (M-P)
DRC AC (EFPD) 17.I 1210.5 1168.8
-41.7 ppm P
P MISCA434-220 Otn i