Testimony of Re Querio Re Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 1 on Ability & Willingness of Util to Assure Safe Operation of Facility.Related CorrespondenceML20071C782 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Byron |
---|
Issue date: |
03/01/1983 |
---|
From: |
Querio R COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8303080094 |
Download: ML20071C782 (21) |
|
Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20214X1871987-06-11011 June 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Based on Four Severity Level III Violations Noted During 860721-0808 Insp ML20205Q1711987-04-0202 April 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000. App Re Evaluations & Conclusions Encl IR 05000812/20100311987-02-26026 February 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 Based on Violations Noted During Insps on 850812-1031 ML20210T7321987-02-11011 February 1987 Unexecuted Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-97 Substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Indemnity Agreement in Entirety W/ Listed License Numbers,Effective 870130 ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20213G4381986-10-24024 October 1986 Unexecuted Amend 5 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Agreement in Entirety W/Listed License Numbers,Effective on 861106 ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 IR 05000506/20070221986-05-0202 May 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 for Violations Noted During Insp on 850506-0722.Violations Noted:Failure to Establish Radiological Safety Procedures & to Adequately Train Personnel ML20138C7301985-12-0909 December 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Per 850606 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Licensee May Request Hearing within 30 Days of Date of Order ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20102A2981985-01-0707 January 1985 Petition Requesting Aslab Grant Intervenor Appeal & Order Further Hearings on Safety of Plant ML20099L2581984-11-27027 November 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099G5381984-11-23023 November 1984 Supplemental Appeal Brief in Response to Intervenor 841106 Supplemental Brief on Appeal & in Support of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ol. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K0411984-11-22022 November 1984 Submits Concerns Re Safety of Local Residents in Event of Accident & Excessively High Cost of Projected Operation of Facility ML20107H7841984-11-0606 November 1984 Supplemental Brief on Appeal of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Granting Authority for Issuance of Ol. Decision Should Be Reversed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140E4081984-10-31031 October 1984 Executed Amend 1 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,deleting Items 2A & 3 in Entirety ML20098G8841984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of RW Manz & W Faires Re Findings 3-11 Through 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098G8681984-10-0202 October 1984 Answer to Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record Re Bechtel Independent Design Review.Motion Should Be Denied ML20098G8901984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Kj Green & RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8911984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Cw Dick & EM Hughes Re Independent Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20098E2371984-09-24024 September 1984 Reply to Intervenor 840918 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097E7221984-09-13013 September 1984 Agreed Motion for Time Extension Until 841101 to File Petition for Hearing Re Emergency Planning Commitment W ML20097C5311984-09-12012 September 1984 Motion to Reopen Record to Include Plant Design as Issue. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097B7791984-09-10010 September 1984 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision Re Reinsp Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6441984-08-28028 August 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Related Correspondence ML20112D5271984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-4,consisting of Feb 1984 Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D5031984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-5,consisting of June 1984 Suppl to Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D7441984-08-23023 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-1,consisting of Undated List of Teutken Safety Category Insp Types ML20112D7511984-08-21021 August 1984 Staff Exhibit S-R-1,consisting of 840813 Instruction for Walkdown of Cable Tray Hanger Connection Welds ML20112D4641984-08-21021 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20094P7721984-08-17017 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Direct Testimony of CC Stokes on Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094R1021984-08-17017 August 1984 Transcript of CC Stokes 840817 Deposition in Chicago,Il. Pp 1-173.Vol Ii.Related Correspondence ML20094P5991984-08-16016 August 1984 Direct Testimony of CC Stokes Re Engineering Evaluations Performed & Use of Engineering Judgement by Sargent & Lundy. Suggests Need for Independent Engineering Analysis of Safety Significance of Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20094P6311984-08-14014 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ds Kochhar on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6831984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wh Bleuel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Resume Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094P6951984-08-13013 August 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of EP Erickson on Contention 1 Re Reinsp program-inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093L4881984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Eb Branch Re Contention 1 (Reinsp Program,Work Quality).Related Correspondence ML20093L1811984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of KT Kostal on Contention 1 Re Capacity of Sys Control Corp Supplied Components to Carry Design Loads.Related Correspondence ML20093L2721984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Evaluations of Discrepancies in Cable Tray Hanger Connections,Solid Bottom Tray Welds & Ladder Tray Weld Connections.Related Correspondence ML20093L2051984-07-30030 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ld Johnson on Contention 1 Re Adequacy of Sys Control Corp Supplied Main Control Boards.Related Correspondence ML20090E5521984-07-17017 July 1984 Testimony of Eb Branch Re Job Responsibilities,Educ Background & Work Experience.Related Correspondence ML20090A7981984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Gf Marcus Re Pittsburgh Testing Lab Source Insp of Equipment & Components Supplied by Sys Control Corp ML20090A8121984-07-0909 July 1984 Testimony of Bf Maurer Re Analysis of Structural Adequacy of Main Control Panels Designed & Fabricated by Sys Control Corp ML20092P7921984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag Re QA Inspector Reinsp Program for Hunter Corp.Related Correspondence ML20092P7891984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Rv Laney on Contention 1 Re Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7951984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Ak Singh on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7941984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of LO Delgeorge on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification & Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P5541984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Dl Leone on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program for Work Quality ML20092P5551984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of R French on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program ML20092P7781984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wj Shewski on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Inspector Qualification.Related Correspondence ML20092P7811984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Jm Mclaughlin on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program,Work Quality.Related Correspondence ML20092P7871984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony & Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Reinsp Program.Related Correspondence ML20092P7851984-07-0202 July 1984 Summary of Testimony & Testimony of Wb Behnke on Contention 1 Re Overview of Quality Program,Work Quality. Related Correspondence ML20092N4971984-06-29029 June 1984 Testimony of Bg Treece on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092N4911984-06-29029 June 1984 Summary of Direct Testimony of Jo Binder on Issues 5 & 6 Re Cable Overtensioning,As Limited by ASLB 840608 Order.Related Correspondence ML20092K7691984-06-26026 June 1984 Summary of Testimony of J Hansel on Contention 1 Re Reinsp Program.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H8901983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,585-7,610 ML20205H8941983-08-10010 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830810 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing W/Ofc of Investigations in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,611.1- 7,611.71 ML20205H8841983-08-0909 August 1983 Public Version of Transcript of 830809 in Camera,Ex Parte Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 7,304-7,405 ML20080B3051983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of RP Tuetken Re Util Reinsp Program of Work Performed by Contractor Insp Personnel Prior to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Insps.Appropriate Steps Taken to Remedy Problems ML20080B3091983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Aw Koca Re General Nature of Hatfield Inspector Training & Certification Program.Certification of J Hughes Described ML20080B2951983-08-0303 August 1983 Testimony of Ma Stanish Re Recertification of Qa/Qc Inspectors Subsequent to NRC Region III Mar,Apr & May 1982 Special Team Insps.Reinsp Program Implemented to Review Work Performed by Inspectors Before NRC 1982 Insp ML20023C7151983-05-12012 May 1983 Testimony of P Holmbeck Re Investigation Into Adequacy of Emergency Plans Re Emergency Planning Contentions.Util Made No Attempt to Study Protective Value of Sheltering Populations Around Plant ML20204F5721983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in Rockford,Il.Pp 5,964-6,156 ML20069M4791983-04-25025 April 1983 Handwritten Testimony of J Hughes Re Qa/Qc at Facility ML20069K5691983-04-21021 April 1983 Testimony of Ld Butterfield Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity.Proposed Steam Generator Mods Would Minimize Tube Wear Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20069K5631983-04-21021 April 1983 Revised Testimony of Tf Timmons Re Steam Generator Tube Integrity (Flow Induced Vibration Phenomenon).No Significant Tube Wear Will Be Experienced in Steam Generators Due to Flow Induced Vibration.Related Correspondence ML20073J6691983-04-18018 April 1983 Testimony of Jl Murphy on Rockford League of Women Voters & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Consolidated Emergency Planning Contentions 3 & 13.Related Correspondence ML20073K4461983-04-18018 April 1983 Rebuttal Testimony of Levine Re Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 8 & 62 & Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 2a on Public Risk.Related Correspondence ML20073G4241983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Ee Jones Re State of Il Emergency Svc & Disaster Agency Responsibilities Concerning Emergency Planning for Nuclear Facilities & Intervenor Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4051983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jc Golden Re Amended Emergency Planning Contention ML20073G4121983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dl Smith Re Resources Available for Transport & Treatment of Contaminated Injured Persons.Resume Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
, ______,
, .\
.
- Commonwealth Edison Company o Date: March 1, 1983
/-
In the Matter of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGU -
BEFORE THE ATOf -
9 SAFETY 4bND c%c 0
N.
c?9f,) 'dk, COMMISSION
-12
~
ENSING BOARD c- ~u'4 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COM A *^@gg)
Y 4 et Nos. 50-454 OL 50-455 OL (Byron Nuclear Power Statfbn', c ; N Units 1 & 2)
SUMMARY
OF ROBERT E. QUERIO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION 1 i.
I. Robert E. Querio is the Station Superintendent for the Byron Station. He is responsible for the direct manage-ment of the station.
II. Mr. Querio's testimony will discuss the following:
A. The commitment of Station personnel to the safe operation of Byron; ,
B. The qualifications of Byron Station personnel; and C. The Station's plans for the safe packaging and transport of radioactive waste materials.
III. As Station Superintendent, Mr. Querio has the respons-ibility to carry out Commonwealth Edison Company's strong commitment to the s'afe operations of its nuclear power plants.
IV. Mr. Querio will be able to safely maintain and operate Byron Station through the assistance of a large and qualified staff.
A. Approximately 470 people will be assigned to Byron Station when it is fully operational.
B. Byron Station's organizational structure is as follows:
<2-~~ _.
J ()-
a3 ape 8Pa88ab T "
+ J
. 1, s
6
- 1. Operating Group:
- a. This group is responsible for the day-to-day activities of the Station,
- b. The Operating Group includes the following personnel:
- i. Operating Assistant Superintendent; ii. Station Shift Engineers; and iii. SRO-Licensed Station Control Room Engineers.
- 2. Maintenance Group:
- a. This group is responsible for main-taining and repairing equipment.
- b. This group has four department super-visors who report to the Maintenance Assistant Superintendent:
- i. Master Instrument Mechanic; ii. Master Electrician; iii. Master Mechanic; and iv. Storeroom Supervisor.
- 3. Administrative and Support Services Group:
- a. This group has broad responsibilities not within the areas of Operations and Maintenance.
- b. The group has five Department Super-visors:
- i. Technical Staff Supervisor; ii. Radiation Chemistry Supervisor; iii. Station Quality Control Supervisor; iv. Security Administrator; and
- v. Office Supervisor.
- 4. Personnel Administration Group:
- a. This group has a Training Supervisor which reports to the Personnel Admin-istrator.
s O
- b. The Training Department is responsible for all personnel training.
C. The staff at Byron Station have appropriate levels of skill, experience, and training to enable them to carry out their responsibilities.
V. Byron Station will have appropriate procedures and the necessary equipment to assure that low level radio-active waste is properly packaged and shipped to disposal facilities.
A. The Station's equipment and administrative controls will incorporate improvements suggested by Edison's prior operating experience.
B. Byron Station will have the facilities to appro-priately process solid radioactive waste for shipment to burial sites.
C. The Station is developing a Process Control Program which will describe methods to'be used to assure that the solid waste system will perform as intended.
l l
l l
l i
L
i TESTIMONY OF ROBERT E. QUERIO ON CONTENTION 1 Q .1. - State your name and present occupation.
A.l. My name is Robert E. Querio. I am presently employed by Commonwealth Edison Company as Station Superintendent for the Byron Nuclear Station.
Q.2. Briefly state your educational background and professional qualifications.
A.2. I graduated from the Illinois Institute of Tech-nology in January, 1965. My background includes three years of fossil station experience prior to being as-signed to the Commonwealth Edison Quad Cities Nuclear .
Station. I have since accumulated 14 years of nuclear experience including positions as: Technical Staff Engineer, Senior Reactor Operator (SRO), licensed Operating Shift Foreman and Technical Staff Supervising Engineer, all at Quad Cities Nuclear Station. I then served as the Byron Station Operating Assistant Super-intendent for 3-1/2 years and have been the Station Superintendent for the past 2-1/2 years.
O.3. Describe your responsibilities as Station Super-intendent for the Byron Nuclear Station.
A.3. As Station Superintendent, I fulfill the position of Plant Manager as described in American National
__ _ - J
.- Standard ANSI N18.1-1971. I am responsible for the
. direct management of the station including the planning, coordination and direction of t'te operation, maintenance, refueling, and technical activities. I am responsible for the final approval of all Station procedures and re-ports. When I prepared this testimony, over 450 individuals were subject to my supervision and control.
Q.4. What is the purpose of your testimony?
A.4. In Contention 1 the Intervenors have stated that, by virtue of the Company's history of non-compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations, the Company has demonstrated its inability or unwillingness to operate the Byron Station within NRC regulations. My testimony addresses the qualifications of the Station personnel, the commitment of the Station personnel, including myself, to safe operation of the Station, and the Station's plans for the packaging and L l transport of waste materials. By this testimony I show that the Station will be staffed by able and experienced personnel with the necessary technical qualifications to safely operate the Byron Station within NRC reg-i ulations and that the Station management has the same strong commitment to safe operations as does Edison's corporate management.
l -
_3 Q.5. Could you explain what you mean when you say that the Station's management has the same strong commitment to safe operations as has the corporate management?
A.5. Yes. Commonwealth Edison Company's commitment to safe operations of its nuclear power plants begins with the highest level of corporate management.
This commitment is reflected in Vice-President's Instruction No. 1-0-17 signed by the Vice-President of Nuclear Operations, Cordell Reed, which states in part:
This Instruction reaffirms Company policy regarding adherence to nuclear procedures and technical specifications. The primary -
t concern of the Company with respect to the operation of its nuclear generating plants is to ensure the health and safety of the public as well as station personnel. All personnel within the Company share this responsibility.
As Station Superintendent, it is my responsibility to carry out this instruction and to ensure long-term safe operation of Byron Station.
l Q.6. How do you, as Station Superintendent, carry out j that responsibility?
A.6. Basically by assuring that there exist appropriate l procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of l
l the Station, and that the procedures and other necessary l
i I
i
_4_
steps are performed in a satisfactory manner. I have a large and qualified staff assigned to the Byron Sta-tion to assist me in maintaining and operating the plant safely.
Q.7. Please describe the staff which will be assigned
~
to the Byron Station.
A.7. When fully operational, and af ter completion of all start-up tests, there will be approximately 470 persons assigned to the Byron Station to operate and maintain the plant on a day-to-day basis. During initial start-up there will be additional personnel.
Of these, approximately 450 are currently assigned to the Station and are currently involved in preparation of the plant for operation and the performance of various pre-operational testing and checks that are required.
The current organizational structure for the Byron Station was developed as a result of a study performed in late 1978 on behalf of the Company by Booze, Allen
& Hamilton Company. This study was designed to develop a management organization and administrative controls at our nuclear stations and corporate offices to en-hance both operational safety and overall reliability of our nuclear generating units. As a result of this i
i l
. . j l
. l study, additional personnel were assigned to our oper-ating stations to strengthen management controls and l various operating systems and procedures have been improved. The management structure at the Byron Station incorporates a number of these improvements.
~
Q.8. Would you please describe the operational structure to be employed at the Byron Station when it becomes
- operational?
A.8. The Byron staff will be organized into four main functional groups consisting of the Operating Group, the Maintenance Group, the Administrative and Support Services Group, and the Personnel Administration Group.
There are three Assistant Superintendents and a Per-sonnel Administrator in charge of the four functional areas.
The Assistant Superintendents and the Personnel Administrator report directly to me as Station Super-intendent. Exhibit 1 to this testimony shows the or-ganizational chart for the Station's main functional groups.
Q.9. What are the responsibilities of the Operating Group?
A.9. Day-to-day operations of the Station are the responsibility of the Operating Group under the general supervision of the Assistant Superintendent-Operating and the specific supervision of the Station Shif t Engineer. The Station Shif t Engineer is the equivalent of the Shift Supervisor and is responsible for operating the plant in compliance with the NRC Operating bicense and Station Procedures on a day-to-day basis. Each Shift Engineer must have an NRC Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License, and one Shift Engineer will be present at all times. The Shif t Engineers supervise the shif t personnel and are responsible for the plant being operated in a safe and reliable manner during their s
shift. They have the authority to order the shutdown of either or both units at any time. The Shift Engineers report directly to the Operating Assistant Superintendent.
Assisting each Shift Engineer with day-to-day op-erating activities are the SRO-Licensed Station Control Room Engineers (SCRE). Each SCRE has a four-year college degree in a technical area such as science or engi-neering and meets the NRC requirements for shift technical advisor. The SRO-Licensed Nuclear Station Operators are responsible for all Control Room oper-ations. The Equipment Operators and Equipment Atten-dants observe, inspect and operate plant equipment
l which is outside of the Control Room. These Operators and Attendants receive direction from the Shif t En-gineer or from the Shif t Foreman. Special Foremen such as the Stationman Foreman, Auxiliary Services Foreman and Fuel Handling Foreman and their respective crews report to the Shift Engineer.
In addition, three Operating Engineers with SRO-Licenses report directly to the Operating Assistant Superintendent. The Operating Engineers, who are among the most experienced people in the Department, assist the Operating Assistant Superintendent in dir-ecting the activities of the Operating Department.
Two SRO-Licensed operators are required to be s
at the Station at all times. The Byron Station will have sufficient SRO-Licensed personnel so that under normal circumstances at least three SRO-Licensed Op-erators will be at the Station. One of the more senior SRO people on the Station staff will be assigned on-call duty so that administrative level support is available for the Shif t Engineer on a twenty-four-hour-a-day basis.
This operating organization provides for the pre-sence at tla Station of highly qualified licensed senior Reactor Operators to supervise operations at all times ;
and, in addition, provides for high level administrative support on an on-call basis.
i 9
Q.10. What is the function of the Maintenance Department?
. A.10. The Maintenance Department is organized to previde for normal repairs of equipment in the event of equipment.
failure and additionally to provide for surveillance, preventive maintenance, testing and other checks to verify that the plant-equipment is maintained at its designed condition to ensure the safe operatid'n of the equipment. The Maintenance Department procedures es-tablish administrative controls to assure that main-tenance work is performed in accordance with the reg-4 ulatory requirements and design specifications.
t Q.ll. Describe the organization of the Maintenance 2
Group.
A.ll. The Maintenance Group is organized into four de-
, partments. Each of the four Department Supervisors, the Master Instrument Mechanic, the Master Electrician, the Master Mechanic, and the Storeroom Supervisor i
! report directly to the Maintenance Assistant Super-intendent. .
i' The Master Instrument Mechanic is responsible for
! calibrating, maintaining and repairing plant instru-mentation. He is supported by Instrument Work Analysts, Instrument Foremen, Control System Technicians, Instru-ment "A" Grade Mechanics and Instrument "B" Grade Mechanics.
_9_
The Master Electrician is responsible for maintaining and repairing all plant electrical equipment. He is supported by Electrical Work Analysts, Electrical Foremen, Senior Nuclear Electricians, Electrician "A" Grade Mechanics, Electrician "B" Grade Mechanics and Electrical Helpers.
The Master Mechanic is responsible for malntaining and repairing all plant mechanical equipment. He is supported by Mechanical Work Analysts, Mechanical Fore-men, Senior Nuclear Mechanics, "A" Grade Mechanics, "B" Grade Mechanics and Mechanic Helpers.
The Storeroom Supervisor orders and stores parts an1 other supportive materials. He is supported by an s
Assistant Storeroom Supervisor and Stockmen.
Q.12. What are the responsibilities of the Administrative and Support Services Group?
A.12. This Group, consisting of five departments, has broad responsibilities for most aspects of plant op-eration not directly within the areas of Operations and Maintenance. Five Department Supervisors, namely: The Technical Staff Supervisor, the Radiation Chemistry Supervisor, the Office Supervisor, the Quality Control _
Supervisor and the Security Administrator report directly to the Assistant Superintendent for administrative and support services.
s L
The Technical Staff Supervisor (TSS) provides technical support for plant operations, refueling, maintenance and plant modifications. He is sponsible for monitoring equipment performance and amenting the Station onsite review and in~e' ..; function as described in the technical spec 3 .t s . This func-tion includes review of a1' e .ated activities at the plant to ensure thL 2re carried out in compliance with all applichole regulations. The TSS is supported by the Assistant Tech Staff Supervisor of Licensing and his staff; the Assistant Tech Staff Supervisor of Startup and his staff; the Assistant Tech Staff Supervisor of Operations and his staff; and '
various Group Leaders and their respective system test engineers.
The Radiation Chemistry Supervisor, who is also the Radiation Protection Manager, is responsible for the Chemistry and Health Physics Programs. The Station Chemist, Station Health Physicist and Radiation Chem-istry Foremen report to this supervisor.
The Station Quality Control Supervisor reports to the Administrative and Support Services Assistant Superintendent and is responsible for the Quality Control activities at the station such as: Reviewing drawings, specifications, maintenance / modification procedures and requests for purchase for inclusion of applicable quality requirements; performing receiving 4
i 4 - e---- +- -- - ~ - - - * - - - - - - , - .
_11-inspection for ASME and safety-related incoming materials and items; inspecting of fabrication and installation activities; and having non-destructive examination and other testing performed as required.
The Security Administrator is responsible for ad-ministering the Station's Security Plan and interfacing with the Contractor Security Guard Force.
The Office Supervisor is responsible for directing the activities of the Clerical Staff in the Central File and Word Processing areas through his staff as-sistants. The Cencral File provides for document control to ensure that all safety-related activities in the plant are condudted according to the latest quality ~
assurance requirements.
Q.13. What is the function of the Personnel Administration Group as it relates to the safe operation of the plant?
A.13. The Training Supervisor, Professionalism-Safety Coordinator, and a Staff Assistant report directly to the Personnel Administrator.
The Training Supervisor ir responsible for all personnel training and re-training activities. This training responsibility includes planning, scheduling, preparing, presenting and documenting the completion of all training courses. The supportive training staff, which reports to the Training Supervisor, is organized
into the following training areas: Operating Training; Maintenance Training;'Adminstrative Training; and Support Services Training. The Support Services Training includes concerns such as radiation protection training and plant security training.
Q.14. Does Edison have people with the appropriate level of skills and training to carry out their responsibilities I
at the Byron Station?
, A.14. Yes. Commonwealth Edison's long-term experience in nuclear power provides a pool of qualified individ-uals to staff Byron Station. The Byron Station will be staffed in accordance with the requirements of ANSI w i Standard 18.1. Exhibit 2 illustrates present experience levels attained by the people currently assigned to the various job positions on the Byron Station staff. I believe this table gives a reasonably accurate picture of.the experience levels we have at the station now.
0 15. Intervenors have claimed applicant's record of
~
, packaging and hauling of low level wastes caused it to be i
banned from South Carolina's low level waste disposal -
site, and in Washington, all importation of low level l
waste wa's banned after an incident of waste leakage in
{ transport by Applicant. Will the Byron Station have the i
r k
procedures in place and the necessary equipment to assure the proper packaging and shipment of low level waste to licensed waste disposal facilities?
A.15. Yes. Commonwealth Edison Company currently institutes considerably more control over the processing of radio-active wastes than had been the case at the time of the incidents mentioned by Intervenors. Due to improved radwaste processing technology and increased adminis-trative controls, the Company is reducing the amount of solid waste actually produced at the Station; it is
, upgrading the waste handling systems to further improve volume reduction; it is implementing methods to elim-inate free-standing liquids within packaged wastes; it has improved control of the design of packages used in shipment of radioactive materials; and it has increased qual.ity inspections of prepared-shipments of radio-active waste materials. The equipment and adminis-trative controls at the Byron Station will incorporate improvements suggested by prior operating experience.
Q.16. How will low level solid radioactive waste be _
processed for shipment to burial sites?
A.16. The solid radioactive waste system at Byron Sta-tion is designed to process two general types of solid wastes: " wet" solid wastes and " dry" solid wastes.
e*
_14_
Wet solid wastes consist mainly of spent filter cart-ridges, demineralizer resins and evaporator bottoms.
Dry solid wastes consist mainly of ventilation air filtering medium, contaminated clothing, paper, rags, laboratory glassware and tools. Spent filter cart-ridges will be placed directly in drums for disposal.
For those filters which contain large amounts of radio-active materials, the drum will be lined with precast concrete.
Two methods of treatment will c' available for evaporator bottoms and dry compactible trash. Evap-orator bottoms can be solidified in 55 gallon drums using portland cement. Dry compactible trash can be .
compacted into 55 gallon drums. Alternatively, either type of wastes may be treated in the volume reduction system. Using this system, evaporator bottoms can be reduced to a powder form in a fluidized bed dryer where they will be decreased in volume and increased in activity per unit volume. The dry salts are collected and solidified using a polymer binder. The volume of compactible trash can be reduced in the dry waste processor. The ash from the dry waste processor will be combined with the salts from the fluidized bed dryer and solidified using a polymer binder. The Station will have a capacity to store 1210 drums of packaged radioactive waste in designated storage areas.
0.17. What administrative controls will be implemented to assure that the solid wastes have in fact been properly packaged for shipment to appropriate sites?
A.17. The Station is in the process of preparing a Process Control Program (PCP) for the solid radwaste system. This PCP is scheduled to be filed with the Commission six months prior to receipt of an Operating License. The purpose of the PCP is to describe the methods to be used to assure that the solid waste system will perform its intended function. It will be a manual detailing the program of sampling, analysis and formulation determination by which solidification of radioactive wastes from liquid systems is assured. w The PCP will provide a means for assurance that the solid waste system is operated as designed and produces a final product that contains no free water and has completely solidified all waste. Detailed implementing procedures to carry out the guidelines of the PCP will
(
also be developed before Station operation.
The Quality Assurance Program provides a final check to ensure proper preparation of radioactive materials for shipment. The Quality Assurance pro-cedures require that all areas of potential concern are checked prior to shipment of the materials. The condition of tie downs, supports, truck tires, shipping casks, radioactive contamination levels and shipping l
l l
papers are among the items checked. If problems are encountered with a shipment, they are corrected prior to shipment and further actions are taken to prevent recurrence. Follow-up action usually involves the revision of waste preparation or survey procedures. I believe that Byron Station will have adequate equipment and administrative controls to ensure that radioactive waste will be packaged and transported within appli-cable regulatory standards, s
i l
l r
l l
l
. QUERIO
EXHIBIT 1 *
/ -
! BYRON STAT 10N ORCANIZATION
. N, i
t STATION SUPERINTENDENT i
i i ASST. SUPERINTENDENT ASST. SUPEi,INTENDENT ASST. SUPERINTENDENT PERSONNEL -
OPERATING MAINTENANCE ADMIN. & SUPPORT ADMINISTRATOR l
SERVICES i
DAILY OPERATING hAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS REFUELING ACTIVITIES UPKEEP OF PLANT SERVICES TRAINING FIRE BRICADE EQUIPMENT RADIATION / CHEMISTRY SAFETY MECHANICAL QUALITY CONTROL ELECTRICAL PLANT SECURITY
& CLERICAL SERVICES INSTRUMENTATION ALARA STORES 1
I
)
2 L
=+
'a V J
y _.
s s
e .
j u- et r=- C ** 'O %.t* N. % C *- US. W th e CO O C) D. *-a . . * * *
- a t- .C w..t c. N.N us c .. rh s.ts 01 % N 4- m N .e re. N = CO e 1 i N tr e ,= w -
- N-f== 4. 22
- MQ , ,
OM d - '
H .Q
% =r4 '
D.1.C DX , s Cl M i 6'
.+
qw '
s al '
- w. I. . . *
/
II 0; **
M, r* 4 20 343 .ar 3.ll: *** 03 .t
. ,. eco g"g# g e .y oCC Cn tn C .2t t t,:p N
,. ,N,.sDN LA - N 4m Or4 N OO CO
.C*
~
5.
81 f s.3 o' rJ .= N N N 4
-. M 3 v.s&2N
~
= ,
a e.
I%m
. (e N ie 3 -.ts b 'J tlh .
2' ~
4 sl <
,u.
=
<d. X
$ I. -
a is -9 e t a
3' ' +J J I' d'? Q - - O ** M f% (Q W = N N 04 W LN Q CT C %O N O M CO 8 A '
t OM,' ,i tg e my r% *J :;- aC c3 N rr, 8*8 . }-- Q '.i " " A
>= '
M
.E. ,C A t}
. L 40 W
.) Go
=I ~
() w>J
- , y
. 4 i b e 41 a.
Dc pn ut . ) . + $ e
,,C <
c u t) + e e fa e.e 3 > := 3 '
o so Cn ND O M . ** C C O C C3 O o No o o e o tc r.$ o a u
?.
c'-@ W g '.u - .D rc x e y it.s ' a is ~
g3 e:n. . . . O Q M w c r.
at b C
~.
V O .e.
sa - o .
13 t3 L d' ! O 2" O C O fat Q r3 Rr r? J*e
'x
. n : ,1 uu 'es*
.M. *'.Q U tbs os sD!%ISt% N UT f% N t$ L. <-- ..9*
a a) e e e s e a s e e e 4. .*we QU c 1 Cs b u .c y & 3, 1(* Cr
- C .O C4 :f" -t %A C STt W f%=:7 NwO M N CC N a:P
- e. - .- v - - MM i uC 4.4 0 ,
D UG4 A- .
Q. e . e e C (1 e X s, i e 3 . . Un C > u.= ., a > . c p ,-
u ul 4.n .sa C fD O C. E D a r;> &
1 . w v u, a y. o [. tra 2 c n o 3 . me
<J n=
. OW
N-
,,C
- Ef3 X?- y'k L 4 % 4 'M b ut 0 f,* M Eh Q y1 % i+.
- e ec e p H 4 u T2 c +.e ..i ,et.c = c tuou.O so7 u> wtr. u EU !E tU E u ti3 ra
=
- ou a.
- u uu c u. u
? - .se w to 9 .- >
( .c ed q*uit
.C b-.
rg u u b 4 L., t,g) o to
.&J 4
.e.i r Z . O r.ra 49 - an s/r*-.
tJ
- T %.*A,N, 65 1-a 3 E Z ** " U C L. -
19 T.. G
- t. . e .,
Y C () .
. p . e, s &