|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARML23177A2532023-10-23023 October 2023 OMB 3150-0136, Final 2023 Collection Renewal Notices of Enforcement Discretion (Noeds) for Operating Power Reactors and Gaseous Diffusion Plants (NRC Enforcement Policy) - Supporting Statement ML23046A0962023-08-25025 August 2023 OMB 3150-0151, Draft 2023 Collection Renewal 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants - Supporting Statement ML23032A3182023-07-31031 July 2023 Rulemaking - Proposed Rule - Unofficial Redline of Proposed Rule Language for American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2021-2022 Code Editions Update ML23184A0472023-07-0303 July 2023 Dashboard Report 7-3-2023 ML23156A1882023-06-0505 June 2023 Construction Reactor Oversight Process Resources Report June 5, 2023 ML23121A0392023-05-0101 May 2023 Dashboard Report 5-1-2023 ML22133A0522022-11-10010 November 2022 Response to SRM-M220323: Final Rule-Response to Public Comments for Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML22133A0462022-11-10010 November 2022 Response to SRM-M220323: Final Rule-Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment for Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML22241A0392022-09-22022 September 2022 737 Max Digital Lessons Learned Report ML22108A1662022-05-0303 May 2022 Enclosure 1 - Assessment Event Inquiry Into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oversight of the Auxiliary Feedwater System at Diablo Canyon Nuclear ML21314A2282022-03-0808 March 2022 Impacts of Embrittlement on Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity from a Risk-Informed Perspective Final Report ML22032A0012022-02-28028 February 2022 Rulemaking; Proposed Rule; Unofficial Redline Rule Language for the Proposed Rule - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning ML22010A0942022-01-0404 January 2022 Trp 29 St. Lucie SLRA - Tank Breakout ML21291A0242021-11-0909 November 2021 Ground Rules for Regulatory Feasibility of Remote Operations of Nuclear Power Plants ML21278A0822021-10-0505 October 2021 2021 List of Leaks and Spills ML21137A3102021-05-25025 May 2021 TLR-CIB-09 ORNL-SPR-2021-1988 ML20091L9832021-05-0404 May 2021 SLR License ML21084A0412021-03-31031 March 2021 Tlr RES DE CIB-CMB-2021-04, Corrosion in Gas-Cooled Reactors ML21083A1362021-03-23023 March 2021 Completed Activities ML21083A1422021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 4 ML21083A1382021-03-22022 March 2021 Rulemaking ML21083A1372021-03-22022 March 2021 NEIMA Reporting ML21083A1412021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 3 ML21083A1442021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 6 ML21083A1402021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 2 ML21083A1432021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 5 ML21083A1392021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 1 ML20304A4982020-10-30030 October 2020 Public Comment Resolutions-RG 1.200-10-30-draft ML20141L5002020-05-11011 May 2020 2020 List of Leaks and Spills ML20070M8862020-03-0303 March 2020 March 3, 2020 - Contested and Uncontested Hearing Processes for a Combined License (COL) Application ML19242E1922019-08-30030 August 2019 Fuel Burnup and Enrichment Extension Preparation Strategy SECY-16-0142, Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment2019-07-31031 July 2019 Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment ML19071A2252019-03-12012 March 2019 NRC Comments on Industry Clarifications FAQ 18-0017 3/12/19 ML19002A1842019-02-14014 February 2019 Regional RIDM Online Survey Results ML19010A2752019-01-25025 January 2019 Draft Action Plan for Advanced Manufacturing Technologies - Appendices - 2019-01-25 ML18347B1582019-01-25025 January 2019 Draft Action Plan for Advanced Manufacturing Technologies - 2019-01-25 ML18337A1102018-12-0303 December 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communications Projects (as of 11/30/2018) ML18311A3602018-11-0707 November 2018 NRC Comments on Appendix D Revision 0g Rev. 1 ML18274A0692018-10-0101 October 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 09/30/2018) ML18247A4502018-09-0404 September 2018 Summary Report of Open and Closed Generic Communications Projects as of 08/31/2018 ML18057A0052018-08-17017 August 2018 COMSECY-18-0016: Enclosure 1 - Rulemaking for Appendix H to 10 CFR Part 50 - Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Requirements - Regulatory Basis ML18235A1652018-07-31031 July 2018 NRC Comments on NEI 96-07, Appendix D, July 2018 ML18183A4432018-07-0202 July 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 06/30/2018) ML18121A1302018-05-0101 May 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 04/30/2018) ML18032A1662018-02-0101 February 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 01/31/2018) ML17222A2392017-10-0404 October 2017 NRC Response to Request for Deferral of Actions Related to Beyond-Design-Basis Seismic and Flooding Hazard Reevaluations ML16314B0822016-11-0909 November 2016 Criteria for Protection Against Dynamic Effects Associated with a Postulated Rupture of Piping ML16041A4702016-02-26026 February 2016 SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. - Summary Record of Decision ML16041A4712016-02-26026 February 2016 SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. - Construction Permit for Medical Isotope Facility ML15015A4192015-03-0606 March 2015 Review of Lessons Learned from the San Onofre Steam Generator Tube Degradation Event 2023-08-25
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARML23177A2532023-10-23023 October 2023 OMB 3150-0136, Final 2023 Collection Renewal Notices of Enforcement Discretion (Noeds) for Operating Power Reactors and Gaseous Diffusion Plants (NRC Enforcement Policy) - Supporting Statement ML23032A3182023-07-31031 July 2023 Rulemaking - Proposed Rule - Unofficial Redline of Proposed Rule Language for American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2021-2022 Code Editions Update ML23184A0472023-07-0303 July 2023 Dashboard Report 7-3-2023 ML22133A0462022-11-10010 November 2022 Response to SRM-M220323: Final Rule-Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment for Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML22133A0522022-11-10010 November 2022 Response to SRM-M220323: Final Rule-Response to Public Comments for Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Requirements ML22108A1662022-05-0303 May 2022 Enclosure 1 - Assessment Event Inquiry Into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oversight of the Auxiliary Feedwater System at Diablo Canyon Nuclear ML21314A2282022-03-0808 March 2022 Impacts of Embrittlement on Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity from a Risk-Informed Perspective Final Report ML22032A0012022-02-28028 February 2022 Rulemaking; Proposed Rule; Unofficial Redline Rule Language for the Proposed Rule - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning ML22010A0942022-01-0404 January 2022 Trp 29 St. Lucie SLRA - Tank Breakout ML21291A0242021-11-0909 November 2021 Ground Rules for Regulatory Feasibility of Remote Operations of Nuclear Power Plants ML21278A0822021-10-0505 October 2021 2021 List of Leaks and Spills ML20091L9832021-05-0404 May 2021 SLR License ML21083A1362021-03-23023 March 2021 Completed Activities ML21083A1442021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 6 ML21083A1432021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 5 ML21083A1422021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 4 ML21083A1412021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 3 ML21083A1402021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 2 ML21083A1392021-03-22022 March 2021 Strategy 1 ML21083A1382021-03-22022 March 2021 Rulemaking ML21083A1372021-03-22022 March 2021 NEIMA Reporting ML20304A4982020-10-30030 October 2020 Public Comment Resolutions-RG 1.200-10-30-draft ML20141L5002020-05-11011 May 2020 2020 List of Leaks and Spills ML20070M8862020-03-0303 March 2020 March 3, 2020 - Contested and Uncontested Hearing Processes for a Combined License (COL) Application SECY-16-0142, Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment2019-07-31031 July 2019 Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events Backfitting and Issue Finality Assessment ML19071A2252019-03-12012 March 2019 NRC Comments on Industry Clarifications FAQ 18-0017 3/12/19 ML19002A1842019-02-14014 February 2019 Regional RIDM Online Survey Results ML18337A1102018-12-0303 December 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communications Projects (as of 11/30/2018) ML18311A3602018-11-0707 November 2018 NRC Comments on Appendix D Revision 0g Rev. 1 ML18274A0692018-10-0101 October 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 09/30/2018) ML18247A4502018-09-0404 September 2018 Summary Report of Open and Closed Generic Communications Projects as of 08/31/2018 ML18057A0052018-08-17017 August 2018 COMSECY-18-0016: Enclosure 1 - Rulemaking for Appendix H to 10 CFR Part 50 - Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Requirements - Regulatory Basis ML18235A1652018-07-31031 July 2018 NRC Comments on NEI 96-07, Appendix D, July 2018 ML18183A4432018-07-0202 July 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 06/30/2018) ML18121A1302018-05-0101 May 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 04/30/2018) ML18032A1662018-02-0101 February 2018 Summary Report of Open Generic Communication Projects (as of 01/31/2018) ML17222A2392017-10-0404 October 2017 NRC Response to Request for Deferral of Actions Related to Beyond-Design-Basis Seismic and Flooding Hazard Reevaluations ML16041A4712016-02-26026 February 2016 SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. - Construction Permit for Medical Isotope Facility ML16041A4702016-02-26026 February 2016 SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. - Summary Record of Decision ML15015A4192015-03-0606 March 2015 Review of Lessons Learned from the San Onofre Steam Generator Tube Degradation Event ML14153A4102014-07-24024 July 2014 Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood-Causing Mechanism Reevaluation ML14085A0652014-04-24024 April 2014 NRC Staff Review of the Documentation Provided by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for McGuire Concerning Resolution of Generic LTR 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressuriz ML14058A0452012-09-20020 September 2012 History of Oconee Flood Concerns ML13196A1892012-04-12012 April 2012 Email from B. Balsam, NRR to J. Crocker, NOAA Pilgrim: NRC Complete Responses to 4-9-12 NMFS Questions ML12200A2122011-11-21021 November 2011 Containment Shield Building Issue ML0810102292008-04-10010 April 2008 Lesson Learned Inputs for the Reactor Oversight Program Safety Culture Evaluation for Use at 4/17/08 Public Meeting ML0618002672006-06-28028 June 2006 Tritium Issue Ex. 5, Portions Outside the Scope of the Request ML0634701762006-03-29029 March 2006 Pilgrim: NRC Contact Report - Arrange Meeting with Town Officials During Site Audit (Intergovernmental) ML0608107112006-03-22022 March 2006 for the Record: Summary of Nrc'S Review of the Recent Security Issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant ML0607204302006-03-0101 March 2006 March 1, 2006 Public Meeting Slides for Proposed Generic Letter Post-Fire Safe-Shutdown Circuit Analysis Spurious Actuations. 2023-07-31
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
NRC STAFF
SUMMARY
Contested and Uncontested Hearing Processes for a Combined License (COL)
Application March 3, 2020 In accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), and NRC regulations, the NRC holds an uncontested hearing and provides an opportunity for a contested hearing before issuance of a COL. The purpose of the uncontested (also called mandatory) hearing is to support Commission oversight of the staffs review of the application. The purpose of the contested hearing process is to allow interested persons an opportunity to challenge one or more aspects of the COL application. These two hearing processes are summarized below.
Contested Hearing Process
- 1. The contested hearing process begins with a notice of hearing that is published in the Federal Register. This notice announces the opportunity for persons to file petitions to intervene in the hearing. (10 CFR 2.104(a)).
- a. The notice of hearing will be published shortly after the application is docketed (that is, accepted for staff review) and will ordinarily require that intervention petitions be submitted within 60 days.
- b. For an intervention petition to be granted, the petitioner must demonstrate standing and propose an admissible contention (10 CFR 2.309).
- c. The applicant and NRC staff have 25 days to file an answer to an intervention petition. The petitioner has 7 days to reply to these answers. (10 CFR 2.309(i)).
- d. Usually, a licensing board decides whether to grant the intervention petition.
- e. If the petition is granted, a contested (i.e., adversarial) hearing will be held unless the contested issue is resolved before the hearing occurs.
- f. The general hearing procedures in Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 2 govern the contested hearing process. If an intervention petition is granted, the licensing board will select additional procedures from another Subpart of Part 2 to govern the hearing; in most cases Subpart L procedures will apply.
- 2. To show standing, the petitioner must demonstrate, among other things, that it has an interest in the proceeding that would be affected by a decision that could be taken in the proceeding.
- 3. Proposed contentions must satisfy the criteria in 10 CFR 2.309(f)(1)(i)-(vi):
- a. specify the legal or factual issues in controversy
- b. briefly explain the basis for the contention
- c. demonstrate that the contention is within the scope of the proceeding and material to the required NRC findings for issuance of the license
- d. concisely state the facts or expert opinions supporting the contention
- e. provide sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact.
- 4. Non-party participation by interested states, local governments, and federally recognized Indian Tribes is governed by 10 CFR 2.315(c).
- 5. There is a limited right for the participants to file an appeal with the Commission challenging a licensing boards decision to grant or deny the intervention petition (10 CFR 2.311).
1
- 6. If the intervention petition is granted:
- a. The licensing board will select the additional procedures for the hearing (10 CFR 2.310). For COL applications, the Subpart L procedures apply by default, but other procedures may apply if certain criteria are met.
- b. Model milestones for hearings under various subparts are in 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix B.
- c. The NRC staff must decide whether to participate as a party within 15 days of a decision granting an intervention petition (10 CFR 2.1202(b)(2)).
- d. The intervenor, applicant, and NRC staff must disclose documents relevant to admitted contentions within 30 days of the decision granting the petition and update these disclosures every month (10 CFR 2.336). On the same schedule, the NRC staff must also produce a hearing file that, among other things, includes the application, any associated NRC reports, the NRC EIS, and correspondence between the applicant and the staff (10 CFR 2.1203).
- e. The licensing board typically issues a scheduling order governing document disclosures and other matters relevant to the proceeding (10 CFR 2.332).
- 7. Persons may file intervention petitions and new or amended contentions after the initial 60-day deadline, but they must show good cause for filing after the deadline (10 CFR 2.309(c)).
- 8. Admitted contentions can be resolved prior to hearing, for example, by settlement, by motions to dismiss the contention as moot, or by motions for summary disposition (10 CFR 2.323, 2.338, 2.1205).
- 9. Hearings on environmental issues challenging the environmental report and addressed in the EIS may not commence until the final EIS is published. Hearings on safety issues may commence before publication of the safety evaluation if this would expedite the proceeding. The presiding officer must consider the staffs review schedule to ensure that the hearing schedule does not adversely impact the staff's ability to complete its reviews in a timely manner. (10 CFR 2.332(d)).
- 10. A Subpart L hearing involves the following steps (10 CFR 2.1207 unless otherwise indicated):
- a. Parties file initial statements of position and written testimony.
- b. Parties file written responses and rebuttal testimony.
- c. Parties file proposed questions for the presiding officer to consider asking the witnesses. Filing is in camera, but questions will be made public if asked during the hearing or otherwise after the presiding officers initial decision after hearing.
- d. By default, cross-examination by an opposing party is not allowed, but a party may move to conduct cross-examination. The motion will be granted only if the presiding officer determines that cross-examination is necessary to ensure the development of an adequate record for decision. (10 CFR 2.1204).
- e. An oral hearing will be held unless the presiding officer grants a unanimous joint motion of the parties asking that the hearing consist of written submissions (10 CFR 2.1206).
- f. Only the presiding officer will ask questions at the oral hearing, unless a motion for cross-examination is granted.
- g. After the oral hearing, parties are required to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (10 CFR 2.1209).
2
- h. The presiding officer will issue a written decision on the material legal and factual issues based on evidence in the record (10 CFR 2.1210).
- i. The parties may file a petition for review of the decision with the Commission (10 CFR 2.341).
- 11. NRC hearings might involve sensitive information.
- a. Typically, the notice of hearing for a COL application includes an order with procedures governing the publics request for access to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) or safeguards information (SGI) for contention preparation.
- i. Access to SUNSI requires a showing that the petitioner is likely to establish standing and a showing that the petitioner needs access to the SUNSI to proffer a contention.
ii. Access to SGI requires a showing that the petitioner is likely to establish standing, a showing that the petitioner has a need to know the SGI (10 CFR 73.2), and an NRC determination that the person seeking access is trustworthy and reliable based on a background check.
- b. Issues regarding access to SUNSI or SGI might also arise after a contention is admitted during the document disclosure process.
- c. If a petitioner qualifies for access to SUNSI or SGI, a protective order is typically issued imposing protection requirements for the information.
Uncontested Hearing Process
- 1. The Commission presides over the uncontested hearing process, which is discussed in Chapter IV of the Internal Commission Procedures (available at https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/internal.html).
- 2. The applicant and the NRC staff are the only parties in the uncontested hearing, but interested states, local governments, federal agencies, and federally recognized Indian Tribes may participate to the extent permitted by the Commission (for example, by submitting a written statement).
- 3. The uncontested hearing process begins shortly after the staff has completed its review.
- 4. The staff transmits a SECY paper supporting the mandatory hearing within a week after issuance of the final SER or final EIS (whichever is later). This paper summarizes the staffs review and the basis for making the findings needed to issue the COL (provided the Staff determines that all requisite findings can be made). The paper also discusses any novel issues that arose during the review.
- 5. Shortly thereafter, the NRC publishes notice of the uncontested hearing in the Federal Register.
- 6. The Commission typically issues written questions to the applicant and the staff a few weeks prior to the hearing, with responses typically due before the date of the oral hearing.
- 7. The oral hearing typically takes a single day. The staff and applicant make short presentations, and the Commissioners ask questions. The hearing is public and anyone may attend. The hearing is usually webcast, as well.
- 8. The Commission may issue post-hearing questions, with answers typically due about 2 weeks after the hearing.
- 9. The Secretary then closes the hearing record. The Commissions decision follows.
3