ML20069Q304

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Questions 1 & 4 of IE Bulletin 82-03,Revision 1 Re Ultrasonic Test Methods Detecting Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking in Thick Walled Piping.Response Subj to Change.Related Info Encl
ML20069Q304
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 12/01/1982
From: Fiedler P
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To: Haynes R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
REF-SSINS-6820 IEB-82-03, IEB-82-3, NUDOCS 8212080556
Download: ML20069Q304 (24)


Text

o

'o OPU Nuclear Uh M[

P.O. Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 609-693-6000 Writer's Direct Dial Number:

December 1, 1982 Mr. Ronald C. Haynes, Administrator Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19405

Dear Mr. Haynes:

SUBJECT:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket 50-219 I&E Bulletin 82-03 The purpose of this letter is to provide our response to questions Nos. 1 and 4 of IEB 82-03, Rev. 1.

It is of the utmost importance to GPUN to assure that our ultrasonic (UT) test m : hods are adequate to detect inter-granular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) in thick-walled piping.

In addition, we are actively studying the incidences and causes of thick-wall IGSCC in industry.

Because of our on-going programs to address this phenomenon the positions taken in our answers to IEB 82-03 are subject to change. A detailed response based on present knowledge and information are provided below in IEB 82-03 format.

1.

GPUN is currently in the process of indoctrinating, training and qualifying a new NDE services contractor. When this activity is complete, GPUN will be able to comply with IEB 82-03 by demonstrating our methods and techniques early to middle December. We will be in contact with your staff to make arrangements.

4.a.(1) and (2)

A total of sixteen (16) welds have been selected for inspection l

based on stress rule index (SRI), carbon content and configuration within the system. is an isometric drawing typical of the five (5) recirc loops.

It identifies loop configurations and those welds to be inspected as well as all welds in each loop. Attachment 2 is a table identifying welds to be inspected, their corresponding stress rule indices, IGSCC susceptibility ranking and amplifying reasons as to why the weld was chosen for inspection.

In the event that relevant indications are detected, the ISI sample size will be increased.

I 8212080556 021201 PDR ADOCK 05000219 G

PDR GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Pubhc Utihties System

[

Mr. Ronnld C. Haynao Page 2 4.a.(3)

The recirculation loop piping is constructed of type 316 stainless steel with an outside diameter of 26 inches and a minimum wall thickness of 0.982 inches. A specific alloy chemistry for each piping spool piece is not available; therefore, detailed chemistries for each weld joint cannot be identified. However, an upper and lower carbon coatent bounding can be determined from the material certification which is between 0.041 and 0.053 percent. These values encompass all the piping within the recirculation system.

4.2.(4)

The expected occupational radiation exposure for the planned inspection is described by subtasks below:

1.

Preparation work by Maintenance and Construction

- Removal of Insulation

- Scaf folding Erection

- Scaf folding Removal 100.0 Man-Rem 2.

Inservice Inspection

- Review and Acceptance of NDE 1.0 Man-Rem 3.

Non-destructive Examination

- Performance of NDE 18.0 Man-Rem 4.

Radiation Control Surveys Vork Monitoring 1.0 Min-Eem TOTAL EXPOSURE 120.0 Man-Rem The following is a summary of ALARA measures of presently planned in-service inspection (ISI) for reciculation system piping:

Radiation exposure will be reduced during the ISI of the recirculation system by minimizing working time in the drywell and working in the lowest possible radiation areas.

Some of the specific methods OCNGS will use to accomplish exposure reduction are as follows:

Mockup training in conditions similar to the work site for personnel performing the ISI.

Prejob briefings for personnel covering planned work, radiological conditions at the worksite, radiological requirements, etc.

NDE equipment calibration to be performed outside the drywell.

i l

Mr. R:nald C. Haynaa Page 3 Establishing of the maximum possible distance from ISI activities to recirculation piping.

Temporary shielding to be utilized as conditions allow.

i 4.b The CPUN ultrasonic examination procedt.e utilized for the detection of intergranular stress corrosion cracking in austenitic steel pipe is as follows:

the procedure employs a aingle element, 2.25 megahertz frequency, shear wave transducer of one half (1/2) maximum diameter and forty-five degree angle.

System calibration is performed by utilizing a calibration block containing both ten percent (10%) and five percent (5%)

[

notches oriented longitudinally and circumferentially. The ten percent notches are located on both outside and inside surfaces while the five percent notches are located only on the inside surface. The ten percent notches are utilized to establish the initial DAC on the CRT. This DAC is a three (3) point DAC giring a slope line representing an amplitude height easily observed on the CRT. The calibration settings are then increased in sensitivity by scanning the five (5) percent notch on che inside diameter of the calibration block. The subsequent amplitude on the CRT is always less than the ten (10) percent amplitude. Additional gain in sensitivity is achieved by increasing the decibel setting to that level at which the five (5) percent notch amplitude is equal in CRT screen height to the previous inside diameter ten (10) percent notch amplitude. The new sensitivity setting is further increased by adding sir (6) decibels, that is, doubling the sensitivity level of calibration to the new higher level for scanning purposes. Once discernable indications are observed, the evaluation of whether to record or not is made at the primary calibration level of sensitivity for the area of interest, that is to say, five (5) percent notch for 4/8 node indications and ten (10) percent notches for greater than 4/8 node indications. This is done by eliminating six (6) decibels for the 4/8 indication (ICSCC) and evaluating whether or not to re cord. Amplitudes breaking the base line at locations greater than 4/8 l

node (weld) shall have the additional decibels removed to bring the DAC back in line with the ten (10) percent notch calibration sensitivity level.

4.c No previous experience in the examination of recirculation piping i

welds utilizing the methodology of 4.b exists.

4.d A preliminary evaluation of CPUN's UT methods took place on October 29, 1982 at Battelle. Representatives from the NRC and J. A. Jones, EPRI NDE Center, provided instructions to the GPUN personnel.

I I

l l

Mr. R:nnld C. H:ynas Page 4 As a result of the October 29, 1982 exercise, the following documents were developed and presented to the NRC representative:

1.

UT Calibration Sheets (56 and 57) 2.

UT Data Sheets (92, 93, 94, 95, and 100) 3.

Grid Maps (A, B, C, D, and E)

Upon returning to our facilities, the GPUN NDE examiner replotted the indicaticus for evaluation and review by engineering personnel. The review disclosed that some changes needed to be made to the grid sheets given to the NRC representative at the close of the demonstration. The final report data from the October 29, 1982 exercise describes this new information and is provided for your perusal as Attachment 3.

The preliminary evaluation and review of data led to the conclusion that a modification to the ultrasonic test procedure would be needed to enhance detection of IGSCC in the five (5) percent through-wall range.

The modified procedure planned to be used to examine the recirculation piping is described briefly in 4b above.

Af ter completing the demonstration required by IEB 82-03, Item 1 and the results are made available, a supplement to this letter will be forwarded to you.

It will further address the crack detection capability of the UT methodology to be used during the upcoming outage.

In the event that any questions or comments arise regarding the information provided herein, please contact Mr. J. Knubel at (201) 299-2264.

Very truly yours, 3 =*%#

Petef B. Fiedler Vice President and Director Oyster Creek Swo

//

day of ba,rn po and subscribed to before me this

,A

, 1982.

YM 1

Notary Public cZ/

At t acke nts

?.

,i i

I

.. =

1 1

1 1

l i

cc: NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission J

Document Control Desk j

Washington, D.C.

20555 1

i 4

i L

t t

l 1

l 1

1 1

i j

i i

}

l

,1 i

i i

4 i

1 i

i I

4 I

ATTAQB!ENT 1 REACTOR RECIRCULATION PIPING, typic AL Loop OYSTER CREEr, f

7...

I WELD INSPECTIOt4 PotNTS o, %

C LcoP " A" : @ @ @

I h jk.

']

f-

'x

+g Lo0P " B" : @ @ @

p LOOP " C' : @@

' "i (;

s N

'r toop*o": @ @ @

'(

m eq %

- LOOP " E", @'@~@,@ @

t sf+

(I

/

i

't

+

L 6

s/

/

F

/

pf t

17 16 IE 14 P

\\Y

(

" E " oNLY 4 g3

-i 4

o s

I 12

'd rN Y

T w9l w

i d

5 k

W I

\\

h..

,3,9

.i N.

)o p

N

'~

7]

,, ~,,. -

d

+

e< Q,

D*

  • x,

/

qP 4

'e,,

u e,-

q

  • %+

,/"

Q c

NOTES I;r

" [,"Eb", "c"i "D" H AVE A TOTAL OF 15 WEL DS

EACH,
l. LOOPS

/

2. Loo P

" E" HAs A TOTAL OF 17 wlELDS.

I A, cALAshN 11-13-8z l

NITACllMENT 2

~

EVALUATION SU MARIES FOR:

I RECIRCULATION LOOP A

' ISGCC SUSCEPTIBILITY ISOMETRIC WELD ID SRI RANK (1) 3 1.41 M

14 1.25 M

15 1.36 M

RiiCIRCUIATION IDOP B ISGCC SUSCEPTIBILITY ISOMETRIC WELD ID SRI RANK (1) 2 1.35 M

3 1.41 M

14 1.38 M

RECIRCULATION LOOP C ISGCC SUSCEPTIBILITY ISOMETRIC WELD ID SRI RANK (1) 8 1.35 M

15 1.36 M

RECIRCULATION LOOP D IGSCC SUSCEPTIBILITY ISOMETRIC WELD ID SRI RANK (1)

-i 2

1.30 M

6 1.34 M

'10 1.33 M

RECIRCULATION LOOP D IGSCC SUSCEPTIBILITY ISOMETRIC WELD ID SRI RANK (1) 2 1.35 M

3 1.41 M

9 1.25 M

13 1.45 M

14 1.41 M

1 1

ATTACl! MENT 2 (CONT'D)

NOTES:

(1)

Evaluation based _ on stress rule index (SRI) and carbon content (.041%

.0535.)

(2) M = Moderate (3) The susceptibility rank is based on the stress rule index (SRI) weighted by the alloy carbon content..The susceptibility designation is bench-marked against field occurences and EPRI/GE pipe test programs.

(4)

IGSCC STRESS RULE IA dX METil0DOLOGY 9+F+R SRI = PM + PB +

Sy Sy +.002E WHERE:

PM

= PRIMARY MEMBRANE STRESS PB

= PRIMARY BENDING STRESS Q

= SECONDARY STRESS F

= PEAK STRESS R

= WELD RESIDUAL STRESS E

= YOUNG"S MODULUS AT TEMPERATURE SY

= ASME CODE MINIMUM YIELD STRESS AT TEMPERATURE

!n & Nuclear A m aci m 3 000056 NDE' candration sheet g.1.>7/~c/k inspection ID:

A///

Component [f>c ProcedureffWg o o / Rev. </

te:

SQ fg Q&q,mL ID#:

,/',ftL3 Level: /// ~

Couplant:

07ff;; & /

~

Examiner:

7 Examinerdy Vh MQ ID#:

p c //

Level Couplant ID #:

j/[ff Drawing #

Ud gg Calibt oplock Cgs

~

Date:ocyafg C.T e /_) ',5f Instrument Length

/*

In.

Type W' Typef#.cdo /v7-ID g g f?_

Length f'/

ID#:

O // O I"'

8/M Thermometer o

/4 F

ctual f

Linearity Check

] Yes Edo Te p Re u t

'75 o i ing Reject:

CNP System Calibration Wo C

r.

Mat't. Cal.

Z f[

Angle 100%-

DAC Plot Delay:

[* N

  • I 1

2 3

4 5

g/g' Amplitude Screen Reading go Pulse Energy:

Reflector

% of Full Screen inIrches 80 C

Coarse Gain in DB: c

,/r/8 Node 8o

/6 In.

70 Fine Gain in DB:

\\

Fine Gain:

8 IC

\\

o

~

~ " "

~~ ~~~

Screen Range:

OI

^

40

/8 Node

[

[

In.

-: :: :: :: -: ::\\-: :: :

Screen Depth:

2. [ '/

In.

30 i

[

In-20 OT&R g

Operation Top Notch

(

I In.

10 Freque c :

. ___M HZ O

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pulse Rep. Rate 8//*

I"'

Damping M/<+

BkrCB

[

/

In.

Filter 8/k Bkr P

-[

/

In.

Calibration Confirmation Remarks Time

/ 3 y '.:f Hrs j {3CHrs Hrs,7 Hrs '

Hrs In.

% [ In.

In.

Back Reft.

- In.

4

"//8 Node 8b%

/4in. W

/.Oln-

/

,In..

h%

frk \\ Q ' In/

in- )

in.

16_

[/8 Node J2,5%

d, O In. &%

gQln.

[%1

\\ h.l.

3

/8 Node g/()/o

/./((,1a. pl@

Ul Nn.

(% kVik. \\h %

in g

/n.

\\

g Top Notch

(%

[In. ['%

( In.

k I

in.

in.

%/

In.

x Opposite Notch h in. \\%

h In.

uw-o W'%

in.

Reviewed By:

Notch tY %

L['In.

)%

In.

In.

in.

In.

Level Date // M OO-Initials d

@h AOOOO927 Bar CB (Back Reflection From Cal. Block)

Bk P (Back Reflection from Part)

F QJ Nuclear ATTAC NEW 3 000057 NDE' Calibration Shut Site. Q fyTM.,q _

inspection IbI Q%

Component WE.LQ Procedure (1)Td-cdp Rev.y

[

p

~ / vit*4 e4 ID#: / f td Level:f /// ' Couplant:

O(:Tf4M L Examiner:

l'h M%k ID#: ZOI )

Level: _7f' Couplant ID#:

N 10 -

Examiner:

r u

Calib a on Block Crystal

~

Date:

idM/P2_.

Time: 163 (

Drawing #

V Qh ID#

P ID #

4MO Search Unit Cable f

length _lO','

in.

Type

't F Type fh teecscT-ID c24 Q Lengthf Instrum t OD In.

Freq.

E8 MHZ ID#.

3ROg c>

Thermometer M A-Linearity Check Nes O No Te p 9

F ctual Req d

t r

  • 5 or i ing)

Reject:

0%

System Calibration Mat'I. Cal.

8.O Angle o

Cal. Dir.

- 100 %

DAC Plot Delay:

b*

1 b2 3

4 5

Amplitude Screen Reading go Pulse Energy:

OW Reflector

% of Full Screen inInches 80 Coarse Gain in DB: b

/8 Node SD

(

In.

'70 Fine Gain in 08:

E 60 Fine Gain:

6090

$h 2

h 50 g s-18 Node pf[f N /g in.

- -N-Screen Range:

i 40 7-(

/8 Node

[

[

In.

2 ~'

In.

30

-- -- ~- -

Screen Depth:

\\,

/8 Node

/

[

In.

20 Operation Top Notch

[

In.

10 Opposite Notch

\\

In' Frequency:

2. S MHZ O

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pulse Rep. Rate M

I' I"'

M Jtt,

Bkr CB

)

}

In.

Damping Filter viIV Bkr P f

g],,

In.

Calibration Confirmation Remarks Time

/b/O Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs

/ 09o Bond Back Refl.

in.

In.

__Jn.

in.

'a 4/ /8 Node l

In.

lf in.

In.

In.

q p /8 Node 4/O%

lin.

g(

) k 9L_

in.

4

-M61 M in.

/8 Node

,%l (in.

)6(}

}n( ) %

In.

In.

77 lN.

g O Nn.

16

'In.

In.

In.

In.

Top Notch p 4fo Opposite Notch in.

In.

IL fn In.

Reviewed By:

l %

In.

in.

T In.

In.

in.

W Notch

~~

t.evel Date Initials

@ y(

_,I AOOOO927 Bkr CB (Back Reflection From

1. Block)

Bkr P (Back Reflection from Part)

ine Nucisar Amac1 ext 3 000095 NDE Ultrasonic Data Shsst j [,4)

Component: / ;j >c-f'gj//

Site.

[ff[//h l Inspection ID:

f

==

Description:==

(#,/Gr,,gg c.t.ff J/

./4 'C/[

Cal. Block: /d'4 1.D.

.Qg,>/c %'

Procedure: py;7g o ef[f

,f/f Thickness: / gfe9 in. Test Surface:

O. d.

Material:

No. Positions: /

Distance:

In.

Drawing:

<+ [4 Cal. Sheet ((ddfg Cal. Sheet: of7 Cal. Sheet: 9g

  1. I Beam Direction Long

/ Shear Limited Exam Z No Eds Angle:

$' d Angle:

4((O Angle:

Examiner;Q[

.fdy, e,q ID#://gj Level; ///.

Time Start://'p/d Hr. Time Start: /g46 Hr. Time Start:

Hr.

ExaminehhMd Mff ID#: 2OJ \\

Level:

Time Stop: If0f Hr. Time Stcp: 1 pf j Hr. Time Stop: {

Hr.

h#

O Part Temp: YA 0 F Part Temp:WI A 0 F Part Temp: {

OF Notes:

N[T

/cl29 NT Date:

Date:edd6q fpf2 Date:

0 Information Only Ib#

Weld Height.dd Weld Width Surface One to Surface Two BM Haz Q. Weld Haz BM

/2c0

/3co

/./10 J c25 Jos LAM LNGTH WIDTH Through Wall Dimension g

j Minimum Maximum

)

y Position Position a

y e

6 E

ti S

E In.

In.

d 9

8 4

r D

.2 o

r r

z o

u a

c

}

1 2

}

1 2

s

?

g g

g

}

5 U

C O

O Remarks CW CCW 1

2 CW CCW CW CCW M 9T~l 2.

20 14O 7

l 3C4096 b-1.Z l.950

% W o u m m e-to l.GC 3.2$ t3cb lb t-@

C26.3 %

i No Reportabigdications Reportable Indications k Non Relevant Indications Reviewed by:

M Level:././L Date: //-G82.-

Page /of /

NDE Request No.

A.////

Ang'e ind. No.

O Deh-199 45 Deg/200-399 60 Deg!400-599 Other/600-799 AOOOO926

su y

e-1 a

1g J

N r

$s

.Q

-1 N

VM E

%)

p' L N

%g d"

~

2 sx, 4

k

{o 3

~;

.4

)N D

9%

-a O R

4 d~ i.

%Q b

h 1

l n

N Y

OV l

2 S

l a

e m-+

l N

n l

e

. 'd M

it.

g.

'l.

O' a

.i

.9 N' @{ d.y-

o. E w

wo i

e-h

\\~ s b

M {-4 N

u E

M D.

i

9 9

i W')

O N

a s

n, 8

i o

y o

\\g 8

~

e- ;

s ue s

h h

=

i s

e

_\\

A

/

u n

v x

V n' S i

==

- ---.\\,/

~

0-g a.

8 D

J 4

a V

8 T

i 9

.g n-

-5m o

a

(

s n

.e

\\

48 f', \\

g a

N 2

g (

.5

-t' N

1s 3

s 5

s N 3

1 i

NN

'i' q

n

'y p

.5 9

C S

s.

8 ge--- - + - + - + - + - + + - + - + - -i 3

E r.

3 8

3 c

2

\\

<t:

/

W i

/

\\

5 u2 i

.k A

g' u

g T '

m E

3 o

e g

M c

a 5 n-m 8

E d

8

\\

a e

\\

5 o

i5 D

L i

E a

b',1 8

m e

q t i

i A

9 2

3 i

e x,

/ N s

m s

\\

_S O

M 2

ci A

s 8

=

s O

5'wq f,

8 9 i: 05 O

m-o 3

?S A

's i E i! 8 h!!$

Z 50 E

5 8

s a a a

m Mbb8 U

w 9

Q Ss o

m o u <

m

.y a 6

2

[531 Nuclear Amcerr 3 000092 NDE Ultrasonic Data Shent Site: @[hr64.IE,,

l Inspection ID:

QTA l Component:

WQ., Q

==

Description:==

TGe To EL Ec/ 3 Cat. Biock: pQR I.D..

$Mhpt,6_ $

Procedure:/7) Tai-coy d Q Meterial:

S/d Thickness: J.O S O in. Test Surface: CD No. Positions: M Distance: WI A-In.

Drawing:

M A-Cal. Sheet Of6 Cal. Sheet: if'J Cal. Sheet: gA

/ Shear Limited Exam Z No FYes Angle:

(./f Angle:

(.f { 0 Angle:

I D

Beam Direction Long Examiner:[

/gedlD#:/ f't)

Level: g Time Start: IM Hr. Time Start: jq(/[Hr. Time Start: (

Hr.

Examiner @

80)r Mfb--

ID#: 26 (\\

Le.el:E Time Stop: 134( Hr. Time Stop:f(()

Hr. Time Stop: I Hr.

Notes:

Part Temp: MOF Part Temp: s sl A O F Part Temp:

OF l

Date:

s o/P q(pg Date: /c[p9[gE Date:

T O Information Only Weld Height: O'IO Weld Width l*b Surface One to Surface Two BM Haz Q W eld Haz BM l.z.

1 290 f.r s LAM LNGTh WIDTH Through Wall Dimension

._g j

Minimum Maximum a

y F

8 ag 3

Position Position g

9 e

5 E

E S

E In.

In.

8 4

r

?

.=

o r

r z

e e

?

I s

i I

E 1

2 1

2 O

C O

Remarks CW CCW 1

2 CW CCW CW CCW ZcO W 2-l 20 in5l b.C &n6- %Sc p-I.8 I.8

,s u s.c a sepugu.g 8

l 10

/.72r 6 6'5 l

/o 1.ED 12.v J.9C 1bC W

I8D I.bsb

_201 2-

\\

zb i.8

'~

to 1.9 9.C to 1.8

  1. {

No Repor ab)fIndicatio3s Reportable Indications @

Non Relevant Indications 3

Reviewed by: gM Level:K Date: //-f 8 2-Page / of /

NDE Request No.

A>/A Angle /fnd. No.

O De[0199 45 Deg/200-399 60 Degl400-599 Otherl600-799 A0000926

SD y

e l

.J ed g

\\

q w

s j

-Q y \\g 0

e-i k

k la 4 s

=

Nkh N

l_.

'I M

c4 en W

8 ov 2

3M%

E N

h d,

M u

'3

.q

, d.

-~w 1

d, 1.

.a.

,o

@. 3r2p

^i q.

se a

N u

t e-

\\

N Nh O

O h

k

=

5 u

mE

8

~

S d

I l

0 A

k y

,w s

e e

N E

o e-g

/4 y

a 5

\\

/

V A

t 3

'V N.

\\

k 8

Sw e

s a,

b*

'a4,.\\

m N

~

5

\\,

%w oE

\\

q

-I\\

\\,

I N

s s

_ x g

3) g

.5 A

E s._

5*

=

g

'O

.9

  • W--- - -t- - f - -t- /t-G

.d t-r-

% Q r?.

B

,, n E

}

b b

w m

H

/

z k

t E

g s

  • =

e t h s

u w e

_9 Q

e S

I M-h i

E

% 9 E

j

'i 0

0 6

o x

Q Q E

s 5

y t

o q a

e k e

i D

.3 h,s e

a m

o e

_E_

O c.i "N

e3 9 o

c

'6 5.'b

_85$5 e-o u

u' 2

a s

nes8 E

m s

E8 88 m9

~

s t

2 a g g s.

o k"i E

A 55,A 5

5 555$

W 4

2 O

Ui u o <

iC O

r,u 2 L

E;.gi! Nuclear ATTACHET 000093 NDE Ultrasonic Data Shnt S.te: ggggg l Inspection ID:

Component: WRO

==

Description:==

EL6.a tc> SAf 6 -- E: cao Co B'ock:9&R I.D..

(AmQ o Procedure:[fftf-ocG) Si Material:

$,b Thickness: l.c30 In. Test Surface: c0 No. Positions: c%.

Distance: Q4 in.

Drawing:

y\\A Cal. Sheet Cg"h Cat. Sheet: OS"")

Cal. Sheet: QlA Beam Direction Long VSheer Limited Exam C No Ws Angfe:

4[

Angle:

4/ f Angte:

)

Examiner: /[

,lD#: f r/J Level: gf Time Start: G5D Hr. Time Start: [gg2,Hr. Time Start:

Hr.

'I Examinerg gg hpp(.

ID #: '20 # 1 Level: E Time Stop: lc[Q Hr. Time Stop: Jgg@ Hr. Time Stop:

Hr.

Notes:

O Part Temp: $ 0 F Part Temp: MO F Part Temp:

OF ld2tk lO[2(fl$2 bJ h i

Date:

Date:

Date:

O' information Only Weld HeightT-030 Weld Width IS Surface One to Surface Two BM Haz Q W eld Haz BM t.3co l-3o6 t.tro s.o2C t c2(

LAM LNGTH WIDTH Through Walt Dimension g

j l

Minimum Maximum 2

o y

Position Position g

Pg

,g y

d 9

e 6

E e

g in.

In.

8 r <

t 9

o r

r z

o s

?

3 3

g gj u

o 2

3 1

2 y

1 2

O U

Remarks 5

O lCW CCW 1

2 CW CCW CW CCW 2bo 4s Z

l SD

/./ l &

125

+

1.15b l.3sc

  • u>a.n rmsee 6cact I

Zs l orij To.P 1.2f

.C I.tsd O t.300 No Reportyp)[ ndications Reportable Indications b Non Relevant Indications Reviewed by:

M Level:g Date: //-5~ $

Page /of /

NDE Request No.

A)///

Angfelnd. No.

O Deg[0-199 45 Deg/200 399 60 Deg/400-599 Other/600-799 A00 0926

4M g

e-

,a s

s Y

4 s

.1

=

m 2

Tn O

N T

'N N).1h b

q

'E 4

1s h

e t e$

i#

i l',

u x p 44$

(y t c

o h

+

~

m N

OV 3

d t'3 o

'a

  • f p~

6

. 'd D' n

(Y w

d a

.v

,',y.

. C9 -

(

{

')

.d..f-4 (T:

.c

%;. (f. o.h.

~

v: a p

~

(

~ e.-

l f d.g.

t i

e-44 \\

\\; 'd 2

h g IN W.

tn s g

~

Hds-v g

r g

~. 1

7 sA 3

9 O

2 5

/

O 3

O 1

M O

A I[

e e

t f

t a

o i

o a

8 o

D i

o R.

d tse

~

u qe 8

R q

7 S

/

/

e

/

g d

m ie a

2 0

P v

e e

t ca

=

fru S

=

n o

itain3

'/

T max e

E h

it l

e /

T

//

a 4

t

/

m lo P

/

s M

m n

f

~

/

o 1

i i

/

t

/,

Y aic

/

j %

N dn 2

e 4

in I

/

3 n

id m

o a

N W

ijL,

[1 +i1 T

it x

a e

E u

5 f

s 8

0 la 1C v

A E

/

la i

T ts

\\

T r

y A

o f

\\

n ts A

e L

u i

qe R

F 0 1

[/

c

/

le e

a M J it r

n b

o a

f A !

is o

t 3

ru f 3 O

S o

p

/. P is R

p e

n o

it o

D O

a t

d n

o n

im a

l c

=

d a

n h

o le x

o it b

E

\\>

/

a a

t

(

A C. r la o

u dr v

c

'd e E

e

- d r

s y

R o

e g

o a

r e

m s

lo C

N a n

t D.

le a

e d

o d

n I

n l

m h

n D.

C I

WS t

l C

S o,

e ic it t

t e

c o

i U

r T

T c n n c t

s ials e

e e e n N

r p n n a m

en 0 s o o t

}

i o

n p

p p b' D r

m0 e e

e ll e

xf G

e m m c 5

3 t

a a

it o o c E

M C

S C C A 1

E I

N

Ibfd_jhlMC39ai*

NDE Ultrasonic Data Sh=t 000094 Site. @ggs l Inspection ID:

Q4 l Component: WQQ

==

Description:==

pg$M tb (g M Cal. Block: p@ k 1.D.- @$E D

Procedure: [frl\\i-CcD RQ Material:

M Thickness: J.o'ld in. Test Surface 6$

No. Positions: h Distancedh I

N A-Cal. Sheet Og6 Cal. Sheet: 63)

Cal. Sheet: y ) M in.

Drawing:

Beam Direction Long d ear Limited Exam 3 No EM Angte:

(-/ [O Angle:.

y(D Angle:

ExaminerMfgg Me<

IDM ~g'~a Levelig Time Start: 192hr. Time Start: /6gg Hr. Time Start:

Hr.

QG' b h df f[. ID#: ZOI l Level: W Time Stop: /Q3$

Hr. Time Stop:[6c4 Hr. Time Stop:

Hr.

Examiner:

0 U

Part Temp: &O *F Part Temp:

'O F Part Temp:

I O *F Notes:

/d29I81 V/$

Date: l6/29 fp2 Date:

Date:

0 Information Only ij Weld Height $ 030_ Weld Width I-Surface One to Surface Two BM Haz Q W eld Haz BM L'3 W ).2(T6 l 3CO LAM LNGTH WIDTH Through Wall Dimension g

j Minimum Maximum

)

y Position Position 3

d 9

E E

In.

In.

o o

4 8

g 5

D 1

2 6

6 2

g g

3 g

g g

g 1

2 g

i 2

a U

lCW CCW 1

2 CW CCW CW CCW Remarks U

U l

l l

l I

No Reporple[dicationsk Reportable Indications Non Relevant Indica + ions ]

Reviewed by: [ M Level:1" Date: //-6-82 Page / of /

NDE Request No.

Alj69 Angle ind. No.

O Deg 199 45 Deg/200-399 60 Deg!400-599 Ott.:r/600-793 A0000926

SM g

aJ N

O

'k Q

~

-Q y \\g A

\\

o e-s 4 Uk k lu

<=

kk h

ma.

~

ro

@J w

8 ov h

0 32 -+

g N

h

.a l

t 7

u h.

  • 4

'i. 2- }-

':^

G.%..J d,-

6

, r d) %

C-.

oo w

g

. I i

e

$1 x

l Dh bd 2

hNhk

=-

l N

k m -

{a 42 iNuclear ATTA001ENT 3 000100 f-Ultrasonic Data Sh:ct Sne:

Q 77 g(,(,,,f_.

l Inspection ID:

Q\\A l Component: W gt p

==

Description:==

@FC 109 6 6.4 g c, Q Cal. Block: p@ R I.D.:

Q$\\%L (

Procedure:/7ggi-cohn pq Material: SM Thickness: l, Q C In. Test Surface: c30 No. Positions:

(

l Distance: d k in.

Drawing:

MIA-Cal. Sheet

((: >

Cal. Sheet: gg]

Cal. Sheet: Nf7 O

Beam Direction Long V Shear Limited Exam _. No C Ves Angle:

4/q Angle:

q@

Angle:

Examiner:[

4_Qfg-g ID #:yggJ-Level:7p ' Time Start: / I/D Hr. Time Start: /@( Hr. Time Start:

Hr.

Q Nf( hppE ID#:'EO f (

Level:7 Time Stop:/f,3o Hr. Time Stop:/blO Hr. Time Stop:

Hr.

Examiner:

Notes:

O Part Temp: Ob O*F Part Temp: pt$rO *F Part Temp:

OF Date: fd2r4QD Date:

IOlMit Date:

fJ / h 0 Information Only 88 a

Weld Height: M Weld Width I'$

Surface One to Surface Two BM Haz Q W eld Haz BM

\\.3 2 s.t.m

t. ir s.oso teso LAM LNGTH WIDTH Through Walt Dimension U

Minimum Maximuin

)

y Position Position y

g 9

o 6

E ti S

E In.

In.

4 r

a o

z o

o 5

@ /rg 1

2 y

1 2

r pl*j j

g g

,3

=

2 Remarks E

cw ccw 1

a cw ccw cw ccw @

4d &

l 2O

1. W 2

l.2tt.) M)

Y 1.5 b%)

K b49 rest 6iefeseence I

10 1 2<S 22st4.2W 10

\\.tsd Q

1M No Reportagtfflications Q Reportable Indications 8 Non Relevant Indications Reviewed by:

Level:g Date: //-58'2.

Page / of /

NDE Request No.

A.//

Angle Ind. No.

O Deg O[199 45 Deg'2OO-399 60 Deg!400 599 Other 600-799 AOOOo926

W b

\\

2 2

b N

q,'.d

=

q s

1f

8 d ji i

a n

x a

9 2 w

\\

i N I

%s

\\N O tm tg S

S q

is ii k

s.

l l

2 a.

N N

6 l

e i

OV l

E 3

~

1 N

M i

h ei y

y

. II *

  • d.

o

, _d_.

.o*

o

%P O

. d, d +

W ;

43$

a

+1L.

4 x

ita E

4 u

\\

9 la

/

v 8

E

\\

\\

t r

~

s o

la y

f

_\\

t n

s A

eu C

q W

e R

W 1

M E le e

A W it c

n b

a o

a f

I 3

j r

t u

r 4

is o

S o

p

)

no u

"C p

e o

W Di R

s it f

/ d d

O a

in m

l C b d n

C

!"d!

a a

n d

x o

le d

E

[O it b

A a

a df u

d la o

r v

h c

s E

r e

/

y R

\\)

f g

o d a

\\

tn r

"C e$

F lo G

N a e

D.

d m

o I

ld n

l n

e a m

C

?

}

h n

D. WS t

1 o

c o

I e

c it t

t e

U C lAA ls e

e e e n

/

ir T

c n n c s

t N

re p n n a imM ia m

2'

}

n s

o o t

)

r o

n e

e l

p p p O

5 e

a V G

e m mc 3

l t

E a

x /

it o o c 1

D E

M O

S C C A 1

['

N e