ML20069C475
| ML20069C475 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20069C471 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303170618 | |
| Download: ML20069C475 (2) | |
Text
O g
l.
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 12 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC f GAS COMPANY,
, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY INTRODUCTION By letter dated December 17, 1982, the South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCEfG) requested a change to the Technical Specifications to add a containment penetration conductor overcurrent protective device for the steam cleaning machine permanent power source.
EVALUATION The surveillance requirement on page 3/4 8-16 for the containment penetration con-ductor overcurrent devices requires that the devices be demonstrated operable.
The licensee in its letter of December 17, 1982, requested an addition to Technical Specification Table 3.8-1 for devices for the permanent power source for the steam cleaning machine.
We have reviewed the above addition and conclude that it is administrative in nature and consistent with the basis for our approval of containment electrical penetrations during the operating license stage of review.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION We have deterrained that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increa'se in power level and will not result in any signif-icant environmental impact. Having nade this detemination, we have further con-cluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the stand-point of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR $51.5(d)(4), that an environ-nental impact statement or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1)because the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or con-sequences of accidents previously considered, does not create the possibility of an accident of a type different from any evaluated previously, and does not
..........m.w........
...........m.....m..
....o..........~.....
.......w...u..u....
OFFICE)
.~.~.~.
-...~....-~~~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. -
~ ~. - ~ ~. ~. - -
~~~~~~~~
sunnauet 8303170618 830304 PDR ADOCK 05000395
""""""~~~~~-
canl P PDR OFF1CIAL RECORD COPY usom ini-.szmo NRC FORM 318 00-80) NRCM cao
-c y
y r
. involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendnent does not involve a significant hazards consideration. (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not b1 endangered by operation in the proposed nanner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regu-lations and the issuance of this rier.dnent will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date: March 4, 1983 Principal Contributors:
- 0. Chopra, Power Systens Branch, OSI J. Hopkins, Licensing Branch No. 4, DL LA:DL)
- 4 DL:LB #4 PSB
....DL,..:.LB #4
..AD : L :
orneep I.....h.b.3.y..
e SURNAME) M.@).h.d.bh..
.h.N9. h.f.U.S..
..... f.........$.h.h
$.O.kS.9...
.ll.\\h/.63.....1/..I /.63.........Q. 3./.83.......3/..h/.83... I kf/.83.......
care )
unc ronu sis tio-so) Nacu cao OFFiC1AL RECORD COPY us= i ei-usmo