ML20067A687
| ML20067A687 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1982 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8212020162 | |
| Download: ML20067A687 (2) | |
Text
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOG A. TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street Tower II t
November 24, 1982 BLRD-50-438/82-74 BLRD-50-439/82-68 a
a a
f.-
lE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission b
Region II
~k Attn:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator u
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 3-
'c 1 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 y
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
V BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - FAILURE TO HAVE PROPER REVIEW OF DIAGRAMS - BLRD-50-438/82-74, BLRD-50-439/82 FIRST INTERIM REPORT The subject deficiency was initially reported to NRC-0IE Inspector R. V. Crlenjak on October 27, 1982 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) as NCR BLN NEB 8219. Enclosed is our first interim report. We expect to submit our next report by July 22, 1983 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure l
cc:
Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director (Enclosure)
[
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 i
CO 0
8212020162 821124 (jtk1 PDR ADOCK 05000438
/
PDR g
p S
An Equal Opportunity Employer
o ENCLO3URE BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 FAILURE TO HAVE PROPER REVIEW OF DIAGRAMS NCR BLN NEB 8219 BLRD-50-438/82-74, BLRD-50-439/82-68 10 CFR 50.55(e)
FIRST INTERIM REPORT Description of Deficiency TVA functional control logic diagrams (FCLD) revisions produced by the Bellefonte Design Project (BLP) are not being squadchecked to the Nuclear Engineering Support Branch (NEB).
BLP is not conforming to the intent of Engineering Design (EN DES)
Engineering Procedure (EP) 4.04 (Section 3 2) and EP-1.28 (Section 5.8) by deleting previous reviewers from the review of revisions to TVA's FCLD's (e.g., TVA Drawing 2GWO900-KE-7, RS).
The cause of this problem is misinterpretations by BLP of EP-4.04 (Section 3.2) and EP-1.28 (Section 5.8).
BLP felt that the EPs allowed it to designate any organization as "another responsible organization," and sole reviewer of the revised diagrams. BLP had designated the Electrical Engineering Support Branch (EEB) as the organization, and as a result, NEB was not included in the review cycle. This deficiency is applicable only to Bellefonte Nuclear Plant.
Interim Progress Any future revisions of FCLD's previously reviewed by NEB will be squadchecked by BLP to NEB for comment. All FCLD revisions that were made by BLP will be identified and squadchecked to NEB fer comment in the near future. Any comments received from NEB will be resolved with EEB.
.