Proposed Tech Specs Re Suppression Pool Temp MonitoringML20066F462 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Hatch ![Southern Nuclear icon.png](/w/images/1/14/Southern_Nuclear_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
01/15/1991 |
---|
From: |
GEORGIA POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20066F460 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9101240002 |
Download: ML20066F462 (7) |
|
Similar Documents at Hatch |
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20212J2721999-10-0101 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying DG Fuel Oil Storage Requirements ML20210G2971999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.1.7 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20203C5931999-02-0505 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS to Implement Previously Approved Generic Changes ML20199J9081999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Radiation Monitors ML20197H5171998-12-0404 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.1.2,deleting Footnote Which Specifies That SLMCPRs Are for Cycle 18 Only & TS Section 5.6.5.b.2 ML20236U2551998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for High Radiation Trip for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Monitors ML20197K1861997-12-18018 December 1997 Marked-up Pages to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively. Proposed Changes Delete or Modify Existing License Conditions,Surveillance Requirements That Have Been Completed & Exemptions That Are No Longer in Effect ML20211J1861997-10-0101 October 1997 Corrected TS Pages Unit 1 & 2 Page 3.4-8,Unit 1 Page 3.5-6 & Unit 2 Page 3.5-5 Provided in Order for Util to Issue Amends 208 & 150 to Manual Holders ML20211A2301997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 2.0-1 & Corresponding mark-up Page Re SLMCPR ML20210J0491997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2763 Mwt Which Represents Power Level Increase of 8% ML20141B8561997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Operability Requirements for Rod Block Monitor Sys ML20141B7591997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,revising Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio to Reflect Results of Cycle Specific Calculation Performed for Unit 1 Operating Cycle 18,expected to Commence in Nov 1997 HL-5376, Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits1997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits ML20133F3641997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Alternate Method of Testing S/Rvs During Shutdown Conditions Rather than During Unit Startup as Is Currently Done ML20132G2261996-12-17017 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re pressure-temp Limits ML20132E0161996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contigency Plan & Guard Training & Qualification Plan ML20135D4881996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR Values Based Upon Unique plant-evaluations for Current Cycle 13 & Use of GE-13 Fuel in Next Cycle 14 ML20129H9181996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Associating Changes W/Installation of Digital Power Range Neutron Monitoring Sys & Incorporation of long-term Stability Solution Hardware ML20128M8701996-10-0707 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,increasing Nominal Mechanical Pressure Relief Setpoints for All SRVs & Allow Operation W/One SRV & Associated Functions Inoperable ML20113F5541996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Applicability of Certain Surveillances Addressing Rvp & Temp Limits & Replacing Vessel Pressure & Temp Limit Curves W/New Curves ML20117M2251996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator & to Have Exclusive Responsibility & Control Over Physical Const,Operation & Maint of Plant ML20115J4861996-07-16016 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Changes Through June 1996, Satisfying Requirements of 10CFR50.71 ML20117H1391996-05-21021 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2,ECCS - Shutdown & 3.5.2.2.b SR for Units 1 & 2 Revise to Change Unit 1 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 13 Feet & Change Unit 2 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 15 Feet ML20100H7431996-02-21021 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Changes of Drywell Air Temp LCO from 350 F to 150 F ML20094K3831995-11-10010 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML20085K4011995-06-20020 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Power Uprate ML20085A1661995-06-0606 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Secondary Containment Draw Down & Vacuum Surveillance Requirement Acceptance Criteria ML20082V3791995-05-0404 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Minimizing Thermal Stratification Events ML20082L3331995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Selected Response Time Testing Requirements from TS ML20081F3471995-03-14014 March 1995 Proposed Improved Ts,Permitting Drywell & Wetwell Purge Valves Isolated by Drywell Radiation Monitor Signal to Be Opened W/Inoperable Drywell Radiation Monitor ML20077S0331995-01-13013 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2558 Mwt ML20077D8921994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed Deleted ETS ML20078G7161994-11-0101 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Current TSs to Improved TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20076L6911994-10-19019 October 1994 Proposed Improved Tech Specs,Rev F ML20149G3751994-10-13013 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering ATWS-RPT Setpoint by Approx 2 Ft 2 Inches Allowing Restarting Recirculation Pump Following RPT When Temp Differential Between Coolant at Reactor Bottom Head & Reactor Steam Dome Cannot Be Obtained ML20073G9631994-09-23023 September 1994 Proposed Improved Ts,Rev E ML20073D3231994-09-20020 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Change to Unit 1 TSs Re EDG Operability Requirements During Reactor Shut Down Conditions ML20072V3641994-08-31031 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Standard Ts,Rev D ML20072H0571994-08-16016 August 1994 Proposed TS 3.9.C,allowing Shutdown Operations W/Only One of Two Required EDGs Aligned to Corresponding Core or Containment Cooling Sys ML20072E4021994-08-0808 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev Insertion Instructions Rev C ML20072B7541994-08-0404 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Traversing Incore Probe Operability Requirements ML20071H8381994-07-19019 July 1994 Proposed TS 3.3.6.6,allowing Less than Four Traversing in- Core Probe Machines to Be Operable ML20071H6851994-07-0808 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Std Insertion Instructions, Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20069J3101994-06-0707 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Planned Testing at Plant to Demonstrate Capability to Operate Plant Up to Core Power Level of 2,558 Mwt ML20059E9231994-01-0606 January 1994 Revised Proposed TS Pages for Increase in Allowable MSIV Leakage Rate & Deletion of MSIV Leakage Control Sys ML20059L2051993-11-0909 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Unit 1,Section 4.9 & Unit 2, Section 4.8 Re Diesel Generator Testing Under Hot Initial Conditions ML20058P8881993-10-19019 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Re Time Delay for RPS Electric Power Monitoring Sys Trips ML20046B6061993-07-30030 July 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Implementation of New 10CFR20 Requirements ML20046B5561993-07-27027 July 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Showing Original & Unrelated Changes Re Removal of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Trips ML20045E7281993-06-28028 June 1993 Proposed TS 3.7.A.4 & 3.6.4.1 for Units 1 & 2,respectively, Allowing One or More Suppression chamber-drywell Vacuum Breakers to Open During Surveillance Testing 1999-07-29
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20212J2721999-10-0101 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying DG Fuel Oil Storage Requirements ML20210G2971999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.1.7 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20210A4041999-07-15015 July 1999 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1,Extended Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 19 ML20204J6031999-03-19019 March 1999 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Extended Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 15 ML20203C5931999-02-0505 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS to Implement Previously Approved Generic Changes ML20199J9081999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Radiation Monitors ML20197H5171998-12-0404 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.1.2,deleting Footnote Which Specifies That SLMCPRs Are for Cycle 18 Only & TS Section 5.6.5.b.2 ML20236U2551998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for High Radiation Trip for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Monitors ML20217A0861998-04-30030 April 1998 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2,Process for Implementing Technical Requirements of 10CFR54,License Renewal Rule HL-5558, Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 181998-02-17017 February 1998 Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 18 ML20197K1861997-12-18018 December 1997 Marked-up Pages to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively. Proposed Changes Delete or Modify Existing License Conditions,Surveillance Requirements That Have Been Completed & Exemptions That Are No Longer in Effect ML20211J1861997-10-0101 October 1997 Corrected TS Pages Unit 1 & 2 Page 3.4-8,Unit 1 Page 3.5-6 & Unit 2 Page 3.5-5 Provided in Order for Util to Issue Amends 208 & 150 to Manual Holders ML20211A2301997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 2.0-1 & Corresponding mark-up Page Re SLMCPR ML20210J0491997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2763 Mwt Which Represents Power Level Increase of 8% HL-5438, Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 141997-07-21021 July 1997 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 14 ML20141B7591997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,revising Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio to Reflect Results of Cycle Specific Calculation Performed for Unit 1 Operating Cycle 18,expected to Commence in Nov 1997 ML20141B8561997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Operability Requirements for Rod Block Monitor Sys HL-5376, Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits1997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits ML20133F3641997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Alternate Method of Testing S/Rvs During Shutdown Conditions Rather than During Unit Startup as Is Currently Done ML20138G6271996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 11 to ODCM for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant ML20132G2261996-12-17017 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re pressure-temp Limits ML20132E0161996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contigency Plan & Guard Training & Qualification Plan ML20135D4881996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR Values Based Upon Unique plant-evaluations for Current Cycle 13 & Use of GE-13 Fuel in Next Cycle 14 ML20129H9181996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Associating Changes W/Installation of Digital Power Range Neutron Monitoring Sys & Incorporation of long-term Stability Solution Hardware ML20128M8701996-10-0707 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,increasing Nominal Mechanical Pressure Relief Setpoints for All SRVs & Allow Operation W/One SRV & Associated Functions Inoperable ML20113F5541996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Applicability of Certain Surveillances Addressing Rvp & Temp Limits & Replacing Vessel Pressure & Temp Limit Curves W/New Curves ML20117M2251996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator & to Have Exclusive Responsibility & Control Over Physical Const,Operation & Maint of Plant HL-5192, Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 171996-07-18018 July 1996 Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 17 ML20115J4861996-07-16016 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Changes Through June 1996, Satisfying Requirements of 10CFR50.71 ML20212C1491996-05-31031 May 1996 Stability Monitor ML20117H1391996-05-21021 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2,ECCS - Shutdown & 3.5.2.2.b SR for Units 1 & 2 Revise to Change Unit 1 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 13 Feet & Change Unit 2 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 15 Feet ML20100P1041996-03-0404 March 1996 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 13 ML20100H7431996-02-21021 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Changes of Drywell Air Temp LCO from 350 F to 150 F ML20094K3831995-11-10010 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML20093G9401995-10-0505 October 1995 Inservice Insp Program Third 10-Year Interval for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 ML20092H6461995-07-24024 July 1995 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 IST Program ML20085K4011995-06-20020 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Power Uprate ML20086E8471995-06-19019 June 1995 Rev 0 to Field Disposition Instruction (Fdi) HT2-0121-12900. Fdi Documents Design Requirements & Matl Required to Install Stabilizers for Shroud Horizontal Welds ML20086E8311995-06-0909 June 1995 Rev 0 to Fabrication Spec 25A5719, Fabrication of Shroud Stabilizer ML20086E8141995-06-0606 June 1995 Rev 1 to Code Design Spec 25A5717, Shroud Stabilizers ML20085A1661995-06-0606 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Secondary Containment Draw Down & Vacuum Surveillance Requirement Acceptance Criteria ML20086E8121995-05-17017 May 1995 Rev 0 to Design Spec 25A5718, Shroud Repair Hardware ML20082V3791995-05-0404 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Minimizing Thermal Stratification Events ML20082L3331995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Selected Response Time Testing Requirements from TS ML20081F3471995-03-14014 March 1995 Proposed Improved Ts,Permitting Drywell & Wetwell Purge Valves Isolated by Drywell Radiation Monitor Signal to Be Opened W/Inoperable Drywell Radiation Monitor ML20077S0331995-01-13013 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2558 Mwt ML20077D8921994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed Deleted ETS ML20078G7161994-11-0101 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Current TSs to Improved TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20076L6911994-10-19019 October 1994 Proposed Improved Tech Specs,Rev F ML20149G3751994-10-13013 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering ATWS-RPT Setpoint by Approx 2 Ft 2 Inches Allowing Restarting Recirculation Pump Following RPT When Temp Differential Between Coolant at Reactor Bottom Head & Reactor Steam Dome Cannot Be Obtained 1999-07-29
[Table view] |
Text
. . . - . .. .. . - . - . . - . . . - . . . - . . - . - -.
- z; t
.l 1
-ENCLOSURE 21
-! ~
PLANT HATCH:- UNITS 1,32'- >
NRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50 366- -
L . OPERATING LICENSES.'DPR-57,-: NPF-5' Jf l REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL.INFORMATION: }
l SUPPRESSION POOL TEMPERATURE' MONITORING ?
q
'PAGE CHANGE' INSTRUCTIONS 'I f
-UNIT:1 'i
=,
L Remove Paae: Insert' Pace' :)
-3.7-29 3.7-29 <
3.7-29a c3.7-29b- ,
UNIT 2 1
-a Remove-Pag.g ,lpsert Paao-B 3/4 6 4 6 3/4_6 '
-B 3/4:6-4a-B3/46-4b_ i i
'l I
l j HL-1359
.001276- E2-1 i 9101240002 910115 PDR ADOCK 05000321 p PDR ,
1 l l
BASES FOR LlHITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3.7.A.1. Pressure Suppression Chamber (Continued)
Experimental data indicate that excessive steam condensing loads can be avoided if the peak temperature of the pressure suppression pool is maintained below 160'F ouring any period of relief valve operation with 4 sonic conditions at the discharge exit. Specifications have been placed on the envelope of reactor operating conditions sc that the rn ctor can be depressurized in a timely manner to avoid the regime of potentially high pressure suppression chamber loadings, in addition to the limits on temperature of the suppression chamber pool water, operating procedures cefine that action to be taken in the event a relief valve inadvertently opens or Sticks open. As a minimum this action shall include: (1) use of all available means to close the valve, (2) initiate suppression pool water cooling heat exchangers, (3) initiate reactor shutdown, and (4) if other relief valves are use' co depressurize the reactor, their discharge shall be separated f ro'. that of the stuck-open relief valve to assure mixing and uniformity of energy insertion to the pool.
Because of the large volume and thermal capacity of the suppression pool, the volume and temperature norm ily changes very slowly and monitoring these parameters daily is suf ficknt to establish any temperature trends.
By requiring the suppression pool temperature to be continually monitored and frequently logged during periods of significant heat addition, the temperature trends will be closely followed so that appropriate action cen be taken. The requirement for 6n external visual examination following 6ny event where potentially high loadings could occur provides assurance that no significant damage was encountered. Particular attention should be focused on structural discontinuities in the vicinity of the relief valve discharge since these are expected to be the points of highest stress.
The average (or bulk) suppression pool temperature limits specified in paragraphs 3.7.A.1 and 4.7. A.1 are normally monitored using a weighted average of 15 temperature sensors. Four sensors, T48-N009A through H0090, are located in the lower half of-the suppression pool and 11 sensors. T48-N301 through N311, are located in the upper half of the suppression pool. The 4 lower sensors are averaged and the 11 upper sensors are averaged. The bulk suppression pool temperature is the average of the upper and lower average temperature. Should more than two of the 300 series sensors be determined inoperable when the suppression chamber is required, a preplanned alternate method of determining average temperature may be used. The table below illustrates the correctici factor. (if any) tc be added to the operable N009 series elements in this condition. These correction factors for plant conditions (a), (b), and (c) were developed f rom a detailed review of Plant Hatch suppression pool temperature data.
HATCH - UNIT 1 3.7-29 Proposed TS/03403320-16 1
(. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _
BASES FOR LIMITING COND1110hS TDR OPERA 110N
-CorrectionFactor-('F)
Plant Condition (See Notes) to Operable N0Q9A-D Elements-(a) Normal Operation;' Torus coolit.g3not 5-Operating (Note 1);_No HPCI Testing j (Note 2);_No Leaking SRV(s)--;(Note 3)r l
(b) Normal Operation; With or.~without (Note 4)- l Torus Cooling Operating; HPCI Testing; 1 With or without Le6 king SRV(s) i (c) Normal Operation; Torus Cooling 0~
I Operating; No HPCI Testing; With or without. Leaking'SRY(s)
(d) Abnormal Operation;'With or.Without N009 Elements:-if1- i Torus Cooling Operating;:. SPDS Inoperable; 1 Significant Heat Addition to' j SuppressionLPool ,.
- /
Notes: !
i' (1) Torus cooling is at least one_1 rop of RHR.in pool cooling'or_ torus.
spray _ mode.
(2) The Technical Specificatin '1mit-f or this condition is ,105'F. .
9 (3) .A leaking SRV is defined'as an SRV experiencing significant: steam d
- leakage past the seat.- All the steam is not cor.densed in-the SRV
~
discharge line and, therefore..'results in steam expulsion into pool, --
(4) Without upper pool temperature-indication, HPCI testing-time should be limited.to assure the bulk pool temperature does not exceed 105'F.
-Pool temperature data _should still be recorded each-5 minutes as'
. instructed by Technical Spa.ifications, but.the:run. time should be administratively controlled by:the following:-
~
i~ Max Run Time in Minutes = (105 - Tinitial) x 2, where Tinitial is the pool! temperature taken prior lto the _ test with: ,
torus cooling operating. This equation ~ assumes a--30*F/ hour rise in l bulk = pool temperature, i
j
- HATCH - UNIT'l' 3.7-29a. Proposed TS/0340q/320-16 a
f r
-~
~
BASES F0, LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION i
[
J
^
(This page intentionally.left bla'k)
(
c HATCH - UiT 1 3.7-29b Proposed TS/03404/320- 4
1 q
i
. j
- . CONTAINMENT-SYSTEMS ;
l )
BASES _
_ i R
DEPRESSURI2ATION SYS1 EMS (Continued).
d Exherimentaldataindicatesthatexcessivesteamcondensingloadscan be avoided if the-peak temperature of the suppression pool is maintained j{
below 160'F during any period of relief valve operation with sonic !
conditions at the discharge exit. Specifications ha've been placedlon ;
the envelope of reactor-operating conditions so thatithe reactor can be depressurized in a timely manner to avoid the regime ^of potentially high suppression chamber loadings.
Because of the large volume and thermal capac'lty of_the suppression pool,-the volume and temperature normally-changes-very slowly and-monitoring j these parameters dally is sufficient to establish any temperature trends.
By requiring the suppression pool temperature to be frequently logged during periods of significant heat addition, the temperature trends will '
be closely followed so that appropriate action can be-taken. The~ require-ment for an external visual examination following any event where potentially high loadings could occur provides assurance that no significant damage-was encountered. Particular attention should be focused on structural discontinuities in the vicinity of the relief. valve-discharge-since these are expected to be.the points of highest stress.
l In addition to the limits on temperature _of the suppresstor chamber pool water, operating procedures define the action'to be taken:in the event a safety / relief valve inadvertently opens or sticks open. .As_a minimum,-this action shall include: (1) use of all available means to close the valve, (2) initiate suppression pool water cooling -(3) initiate' i reactor shutdown, and (4) if other safety / relief-valves are used to depres-surize the reactor, their distharge shall be-separated-from that'of the
! stuck-open safety / relief valve to assure mixing and uniformity of energy ,
insertion to the pool. '
l The average (or bulk) suppression pool temperature limits specified in I
paragraphs 3.6.2.1 and 4.6.2.1 are normally monitored using a weighted averige I of 15 temperature sensors. Four sensors,'2T48-N009A through N0090, are located in the lower half of the suppression pool and 11 sensors, ET48-N301 through N311, are located.In the upper half-of the suppression pool. The 4 lower l sensors are_ averaged and the li upper sensors-are averaged. The bulk j suppression pool temperature is the-average of the upper and lower average l temperature. -Should more than two of the 300 series sensors be determined l inoperable while in Conditions 1, 2, or 3, a prer,10nned alternate method of determining average temperature may be used Ine table below illustrates the correctic7 factor (if any) to be added to the operable N009 series elements in this condition. These1 correction factors for plant conditions i (a), (b), and (c) were deve) ped from a detailed review of Plant Hatch. '
suppression pool temperature data. ,
HATCH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-4 Proposed TS/0338q/320-0 J
1 m. y CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS' BASES-Correctton FactorJ(*F)
Plant condition (See Notes) to Operable N009A-D' Elements.
(a) _ Normal Operation; Torus Cooling;not 5
-Operating (Note 1);~-No HPCI' Testing-(Note 2); No Leaking SRV(s)-(Note 3)
(b) Normal Operation;-With.or without' -(Note 4)4 Torus Cooling Operating;7HPCI' Testing; With or without Leaking SRV(s) R (c) : Normal Operation; Torus-Cooling- 0 Operating; No HPCI Testing;.
Hith or without Leaking SRV(s)=
(d) Abnormal _ Operation;-With or without -N009 Elements if-Torus Cooling Operating;- SPDS-Inoperable.
Significant Heat Addition to Suppression Pool Notes:
- 1. Torus cooling is at least one loop of RHR;in' pool cooling'orctorus' spray mode. '
- 2. -The Technical Specification limit'fo'rethisEcondition is 105*F.
- 3. A leaking SRV'is defined as an SRV-experiencing significant steam leakage past the seat _ All:the-steam.is:not condensedJin?-the-SRV.
discharge line and,=therefore,:results in_stea.m_ expulsion 71nto
. pool.
~
-4. Without. upper pool temperature indication, HPCIrtesting time should be.
~
limited'to assure the_ bulk pool temperature does_notiexceed 105'F; Pool temperature data should still;be recorded each Siminutes asi instructed by Technical Specifications, but_the run: time should be.
administratively controlled by the-following:-
Max Run Time in Minutes V (105'-:Tioiii.i) x-2,-
where Tinisi., is the pool temperature taken prior to-the test with-torus cooling operating. This equation assumes _a 30*F/ hour rise in-1 tulk pool temperature.
HATCH --UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-4a Proposed TS/0338q/320-0.
. _ _ _ _ _ =m
i i
)
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.6.3 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES The OPERABILITY of the primary containment isolation valves ensures that the primary containment atmosphere will be isolated-from the outside a environment in the event of a release of radioactive material to the d primary containment atmosphere or pressurization of the containment.
Primary containment isolation within the time limits specified ensures i that the release of radioactive material to the environment will-be consist-ent with the assumptions used in the analyses for a LOCA._ Only one closed valve in each penetration line is required to maintain the integrity of the containment.
i i
l
)
s l
1 HATCH - UNIT 2- B 3/4 6-4b Proposed IS/0338q/320-0
. .