ML20065N407
| ML20065N407 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1990 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20065N406 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9012120112 | |
| Download: ML20065N407 (2) | |
Text
-
o,,
UNITED 8TATES e
[
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- 5 W ASHilv0708d, o, C. M4 i
- ...*e SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATfD TO AMENDRENT NO. 60 TO FACILITY OFERXTIRG LICENSE NO. NPF-30 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PL C JRIT~T l
DOCKET NO. STN 60~T U i
INTRODUCTION In a letter dated November 14, 1989, the Union Electric Company (UE),
i pro >osed to revise Technical Specification (TS) section 6.3, " UNIT STAFF QUA:.IFICATIONS," and section 6.4 " TRAINING." The proposed TS changes delete references to requirements superseded by issuance of the revised rule,10 CFR Part 55, Operators' Licenses, which became effective on May 26, 1987.
EVALUATION-The proposed modification to Specification 6.3.1 removes the reference to a superseded letter from the NRC to all-licensees dated March 28, 1980, and separates the minimum qualification exceptions to ANS!/ANS 3.1-1978 to new specifications 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.1.2.
Proposed Specification 6.3.1.1 requires Shift Supervisors, Operating Supervisors, Reactor Operators and Shift Technical Advisors to meet or exceedthequalificationsspeclfiedinANSI/ANS 3.1-1981 with the same exceptions as contained in the current revision to the Operator Licensing Examiner Standards, NUREG-1021 ES-202. The proposed requirements are more restrictive than the current TS requirements and more explicitly identify the positions requiring these qualifications. The proposed TS change adequately addresses the requirements in 10 CFR Part 55, and, therefore, is acceptable to the staff.
Proposed Specification 6.3.1.2 merely relocates the qualification requirements for the Superintendent, Health Physics as defined in the current section 6.3.1.
The proposed change is merely administrative and, therefore, is acceptable to the staff.
The proposed modification to Specification 6.4.1 removes the reference to a superseded letter from the NRC-to all licensees dated March 28, 1980, separates specific training program requirements to Specifications 6.4.2 and 6.4.3, and relocates the statement on inclusion of relevant industry experience to Specification 6.4.4.
901212o11290120{3 DR ADOCK 0500 P-e.
Proposed Specification 6.4.2 requires training programs for Shif t Supervisors, Operating Supervisors, Reactor Operators, and Shift Technical Advisors to meet or exceed the requirements and recommencations of Section 5 of ANSI /ANS 3.1-1981 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.8, Rev. 2 with the same exceptions as contained in the current revision to the Operator Licensing Examiner Standards, NUREG-1021, ES-202 and 10 CFR Part 55. The proposed requirements are more restrictive than the current TS requirements and more explicitly identify the positions requiring these qualifications. The proposed TS change adequately addresses the requirements in 10 CFR Part 55, and, there-fore, is acceptable to the staff.
Proposed Specifications 6.4.3 and 6.4.4 relocate the reference to Section 5 of ANSI /ANS 3.1-1978 for all other training programs and the requirement that training include familiarization with relevant industry operational experience, respectively. The proposed changes are administrative in nature, not changing the intent or function of the previously-approved TSs; therefore, the staif finds the proposed changes acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or adminis-trative procedures or requirements.
Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuantto10CFR51.22(b)noenvironmentalimpactstatementorenviron-mental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
CONCLUSION The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner; and (2) public such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Principal Contributor: Anthony T. Gody, Jr.
Dated:
December 7, 1990 l
~