ML19325F257

Application for Amend to License NPF-30,revising Tech Spec 6.4.1, Training to Delete Ref to Old 10CFR55 on Operator Licenses,Hr Denton 800328 Ltr & Sections a & C of Ltr Encl

ML19325F257
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	11/14/1989
From:	Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19325F258	List: ML19325F257 ML19325F259
References
ULNRC-2108, NUDOCS 8911200012
Download: ML19325F257 (7)

Text

[O Ai .

e' L . 1901 Chouteaa kenue thst Offite Box 149 V ..

• '

• St locis, Missouri 631ti6 314 62I.32??

UNION Etuernic November .14,1989

,a, $33 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station F1-137

Washington, D.C. 20555 4.

Gentlemen: ULNRC- 210 8 DOCKET NUMBER 50-483 .;

CALLAWAY PLANT DELETION-OF SUPERCEDED TRAINING REQUIREMENTS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 6.4.1 Union Electric Company herewith transmits an application for Amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 for the Callaway Plant.

This amendment request proposes to revise Technical Specification 6.4.1, Training, to delete  !

the references to superceded requirements. When the I revised rule, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 55, (10 CFR 55) on Operator's Licenses, was issued, it superceded all requirements current at the time and less restrictive than the new rule. ,

Based upon this and the guidance set forth in NUREG 1262, Answers to Questions at Public Meetings ,

Regarding Implementation of Title 10, CFR, Part 55 on Operator's Licenses, Union Electric proposes to delete references to the old rule; to the H. R.

Denton Letter dated March 28, 1980; and to sections l

A and C of the letter's Enclosure.

At the request of the NRC reviewers, Union  !

Electric references section 6.2.2.g of the Callaway Technical Specifications and sections 13.1.3.1.5 and '

13.1.3.1.6 of the Final Safety Analysis Report to oL confirm that both Shift Supervisors and Operating Supervisors hold SRO licenses.

l The Callaway Plant On-Site Review Committee and L

the Nuclear Safety Review Board have reviewed and l approved this amendment request. Attachments 1,2, and 3 provide the Safety Evaluation, the Significant Hazard Evaluation, and the proposed Technical Specification change. A#l fff12 COO p

12891114 ADOCK 050004s3 j PDC

b >

, .. ac .

5 ',,.

r

.' ' ' A 'r  ; it y

[ .,,.f.

. m

.pr,,.: (c.

o. ,

. \' l L

[

s ., , +~- ,

5

'I i ti '

The ptoposed' amendment requent will be'

implemented upon approval by the NRC, "

i a.. ;

.g ,

Very.truly yours3 7 .!

F i l a i, e

/ .,

onay . Schnell  !,

i'.,, o DJwf3,3

i

'l r h f, Attachments: 1. - Safety Evaluation -

[,, 2. .

Significant Hazard' Evaluation .

! ,_ 3, Proposed Technical Specification ,.

b" Change  !

h-  !

Ni

.c

-)

[. '

j.

T g I

j ,

?- t

! I

[' l w a h

F. ,

p. ai v,. I N. A

(

. ,m r

'tiliv

, j l

e t

j t

I I

2 l<. '1

! [I

~ ,

.:g _ ,)

I'

? u i

H, ,

j

f.  ;

)

STATE OF MISSOURI ) i

' '; ' ) SS l l CITY OF ST. LOUIS ) i r [

!. a.  ;

l  !

l.. 6 Alan C. Passwater, of lawful age, being first duly sworn  :

.upon oath says that he is Manager, Licensing and ruels (Nuclear) for  !

n > Union Electric Company; that he has read the foregoing document and L knows the content thereof; that he has executed the same for and on r behalf of said company with full power and authority to do so; and l

'that the facts therein^ stated are true and correct to the best of his  !

knowledge, information and belief. [

By Alan C. Passwater ,

Manager, Licensing and Fuels  !

Nuclear j SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me this /M day of -/>~, 1989 f i

I h k

& FW  !

UARBARA J. PFAFF i NOTARY PUBl10, $1AT( tw MISSOURI [

Mf COMMIS$10N EXPlRIS APRIL 22, 1993 l ST. LOUIS COUNTY  !

.i

[

i t

i i

i 1

1 t

l I -

@ Il o

i- . ,

o cct Gerald-Charnoff, Esq. f Shaw, Pittman, Potts &'Trowbr!dge  ;

ce 2300'N. Street, N.N. L washington, D.C. 20037 [

Dr. J. O. Cermak i CPA,<Inc.

4 Professional Drive (Suite 110)  !

.Gaithersburg, MD 20879

• r- i t

R. C. Knop ,

E Chief, Reactor Project Branch 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l' Region III  :

799 Roosevelt Road '

Glen Ellyn,. Illinois 60137 I Bruce Little  !

Callaway Resident Office }

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR$1 j

Steedman, Missouri 65077 i Tom Alexion (2) [

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i 1 White Flint, North, Mail Stop 13E21 f 11555 Rockville Pike l Rockville, MD 20852  !

Manager, Electric Department i Missouri Public Service Commission l P.O.' Box 360 Jefferson City, MO 65102  ;

{

Ron Kucera  :

Department of Natural Resources ,

P.O. Box 176 i Jefferson City, MO 65102  ;

1 e

.i i

t W ^

.g. ' ' '

v

• r

.,3 ,

j,*'t. a ,;

• T J beet'. D. Shafer/A160.761'

. . /QA Record ,(CA-758)"

Nuclear Date E210.01 DFS/ Chrono D. F. Schnell-J. E. Birk' .

J. V. Laux

.. M. A. Stiller G. L. Randolph R. J. Irwin . ,

o H. Wuertenbaecher W.lR.. Campbell

- A. C. Passwater p'g R. P. Wendling D. E. Shafer D. J. Walker.

O. Maynard (WCHOC)

N. P. Goel (Bechtel)

T. P.'Sharkey NSRB (Sandra Auston)

' 1 E210.01 -

At 40. el* O2,(1072-)

k.

r i

4 g

1 y 4 , -- 4 ~ v~--- -, , ,w--,., , . ,,c- v -- e-w-n+,.- e . , m , - - - -.na.- .-v.- -- - - - , -

fW+ ,

p a ,

(, '

I- ttachment 1  !

DLNRC- 2108 I

L ,

t S afety_ _.Evaluati on T This Technical Specification change request revises Section 6.4.1, Training, by deleting.

references .tx> requirements which were superceded i upon the issuance of the revised' regulation Title 10, CFR, Part 55; the quidance of Regulatory Guide ..

D, 1.8, Revision 2, which endorses ANSI /ANS 3.1-1981; and the Operator Licensing Examiner Standards, NUREG-1021, ES-202. .

- r t

p The requirements of the~new' regulations and  !

these documents are more restrictive than Sections

/

i A and C of Enclosure 1 of the March 28, 1980 NRC Denton Letter to all' licensees' .

j i

This request'does not impact compononts, )

L systems, or plant equipment, but revises Sections of .

! the Technical Specifications by deleting outdated l[

re f e r'ence s . - i f

This change request does not adversely affect .l or endanger the health or the safety of the general 1 p public, nor involve an unreviewed safety question, j i

b  !

L i r t e

?

h t

P i

l h

t 1

e-s Attachment 2

ULNRC- 2108 I Significant_Hazerds Evaluati_oD i

, i The Commission has provided standards in  :

10CFR50.92(c) for determining whether a significant ,

hazards consideration exists. A proposed amendment I to an operating License for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration if operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed l amendment would nots (1) involve a significant 1 increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the  :

possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or (3) .

I involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. Union Electric has reviewed the proposed ,

change and determined that:

1. The proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or ,

consoquences of an accident previously evaluated because the change merely deletes references to requirements superceded by the issuance of the revised '

regulation Title 10, CFR, Part 55; Regulatory Guide 1.8, Revision 2, and the ,

Operator Licensing Examiner Standards, i NUREG-1021,ES-202. The Union Electric Training Program remains in compliance sad the proposed change constitutes ar.  ;

administrative revision.  :

2. The proposed amendment does not create the possibility of h new or different kind of -

accident than previously evaluated because the proposed change is administrative in nature, and no physical alterations of plant configuration or changes to setpoints or operating parameters are proposed.

3. The proposed amendment involves an administrative type change and does not involve a significant roduction in a margin of safety.

Based on the above reasoning, Union Electric has determined that the proposed amendment does not >

involve a significant hazards consideration.

I