|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20206K7501999-05-0404 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.e,authorizing Movable & Unsecured & Experiments in Ctr Test Hole as Allowed in All Other Experimental Regions of Reactor ML20199B7901998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page,Revising TS 6.1.b Re Preparation of Byproduct Matl for Shipping ML20134F3511996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting to Revise Figure 6.0 of TS 6.1,administrative Structure Showing Line of Authority for Mgt & Operation of Umrr & TS 6.1.d ML20072R4291994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed TS 3.3,Page 2 of 5 Re Reactor Safety Sys ML20065E0681994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Involving Change in Pool Coolant Sys Description from Two HX Legs to One HX Leg & Change in Pool Coolant Flow Scram Setpoint to Indicate Measurement of Total Pool Flow Instead of Measurement of Half Pool Flow ML20055C5591990-05-17017 May 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Elements Used in Reactor Core ML20248G8701989-03-31031 March 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Shifting Administrative Authority to Univ of Missouri-Columbia ML20150A7981987-08-0303 August 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Use in Reactor of Newly Developed Extended Life Aluminide Fuel Element ML20210B7771986-09-12012 September 1986 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Basis on Technical Limits Instead of Values for Specific Fuel Element Loading ML20210B7971986-05-0202 May 1986 Spec for Univ of Missouri Fuel Elements Withheld for Univ of Missouri Research Reactor ML20137Y5531985-11-22022 November 1985 Proposed Tech Spec Changes,Replacing Obsolete Administrative Title,Correcting Tech Spec 5.1 Ref to Bldg Leak Rate Design Limits,Replacing Refs to AEC W/Nrc & Reflecting Change in Administrative Organizational Structure ML19347C9801981-03-0303 March 1981 Proposed Revision to Tech Spec Sections 1.20(d) & 1.20.b(2), Clarifying Statement of Control Rod Work ML19341B4931981-01-26026 January 1981 Proposed Revision to Tech Spec 6.1,Figure 6.0,reflecting Administrative Reorganization 1999-05-04
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20206K7501999-05-0404 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.e,authorizing Movable & Unsecured & Experiments in Ctr Test Hole as Allowed in All Other Experimental Regions of Reactor ML20199B7901998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page,Revising TS 6.1.b Re Preparation of Byproduct Matl for Shipping ML20134K0201997-02-0707 February 1997 Corrected Pp to MURR Requalification Program ML20133G3381997-01-0707 January 1997 Revised Operator Requalification Program for Univ of Mo Research Reactor ML20134F3511996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting to Revise Figure 6.0 of TS 6.1,administrative Structure Showing Line of Authority for Mgt & Operation of Umrr & TS 6.1.d ML20072R4291994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed TS 3.3,Page 2 of 5 Re Reactor Safety Sys ML20065E0681994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Involving Change in Pool Coolant Sys Description from Two HX Legs to One HX Leg & Change in Pool Coolant Flow Scram Setpoint to Indicate Measurement of Total Pool Flow Instead of Measurement of Half Pool Flow ML20127P2781993-01-31031 January 1993 Initial Loading & Testing of Low Enriched U Fuel at Univ of Missouri-Rolla Reactor Facility ML20055C5591990-05-17017 May 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Elements Used in Reactor Core ML20248G8701989-03-31031 March 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Shifting Administrative Authority to Univ of Missouri-Columbia ML20236G5391987-10-0202 October 1987 Revised Procedure SEP-8, Emergency Equipment Maint Procedure ML20150A7981987-08-0303 August 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Use in Reactor of Newly Developed Extended Life Aluminide Fuel Element ML20214G0581986-10-28028 October 1986 SOP HP-30, Evaluation of Exhaust Gas Stack Monitor Filters in Emergency ML20210B7771986-09-12012 September 1986 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Basis on Technical Limits Instead of Values for Specific Fuel Element Loading ML20210B7971986-05-0202 May 1986 Spec for Univ of Missouri Fuel Elements Withheld for Univ of Missouri Research Reactor ML20137Y5531985-11-22022 November 1985 Proposed Tech Spec Changes,Replacing Obsolete Administrative Title,Correcting Tech Spec 5.1 Ref to Bldg Leak Rate Design Limits,Replacing Refs to AEC W/Nrc & Reflecting Change in Administrative Organizational Structure ML20063F9191981-10-31031 October 1981 Std Operating Procedures ML19347C9801981-03-0303 March 1981 Proposed Revision to Tech Spec Sections 1.20(d) & 1.20.b(2), Clarifying Statement of Control Rod Work ML19341B4931981-01-26026 January 1981 Proposed Revision to Tech Spec 6.1,Figure 6.0,reflecting Administrative Reorganization ML19208A7961979-08-0202 August 1979 SOP Radiation Protection Program,Vol 5, Health Physics. 1999-05-04
[Table view] |
Text
y g -
J ' ik$ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION L y'Lds] i _
rn - M[t; F . UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
._' N RESEARCH REACTOR FACILITY rp)i = ?
Number 3.3 Page 2 of- 5
.Date '
m
SUBJECT:
Reactor Safety System (continued)
Pool Coolant Flow 2 1 0 425(4) gpm (Min) for each 50% . 7
- capacity heat exchanger leg -
850(4) gpm (Min) for one 100%
capacity heat exchanger -
Differential Pressure Across 2.52 psi (Min)
Reflector 1 0 0 8.00 psi (Max)
Differential Pressure Across 0.63 psi (Min)
Reflector 0 1 0 2.00 psi (Max)
Differential Pressure Across Core 1 0 0 3200(5) gpm (Min) .
Differential Pressure Across Core 0 1 1(2) 1600(5) gpm (Min)
Pressurizer High Pressure 1 1 1(2) 95 psia (Max)
Pressurizer Low Level 1 1 1(2) 16 inches below centerline'(Min) '
Pool Level 0 0 '1- 23 feet (Min)
Primary Coolant Isolation Valves 507A/B Off Open Either valve Position 1 1 1(2) Off Open Position Pool Coolant Isolation
. Valve 509 Off Open Valve 509 Off Open -
Position 1 1 0 Position t .-
Power Level Interlock 1 1 1- Scram as a result ofincorrect .
selection of operating mode.
Facility Evacuation 1 1 1 Scram as a result of actuating-facility evacuation system Reactor Isolation '1 1 1 Scram as a result of actuating reactor isolation system 9404070340 940320 PDR -ADOCK'05000186 P- PDR- ,_
a
w -.
"^
gz TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION; p< 7 g; 8 e x
(k UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI RESEARCH REACTOR FACILITY
l Number 3.3 i Page 3 of 5 Date
SUBJECT:
Reactor Safety System (continued)
Manual Scram 1 1 1 Push Button at Control Consolo (1) Flow orifice or heat exchanger AP (psi)in each operating heat exchanger leg corresponding to the flow value in the table.
(2) Not required below 50 KW operation if natural convection flange and pressure vessel cover are removed or in operation with the reactor suberitical by a margin of at least 0.015 AK.
- (3) Trip pressure is that which corresponds to the pressurizer pressure indicated
- l. in the table with normal primary coolant flow.
(4) Flow orifice AP (psi) corresponding to the flow value in the table.
(5) Core AP (psi) corresponding to the core flow value in the table.
Bases
- a. The specifications on high power, primary coolant flow, primary coolant pressure, and reactor inlet temperature provide for the safety system settings outlined in specifications 2.2.a,2.2.b, and 2.2.c. In Mode I and II operation the core differential temperature is approximately 17 F d
me
+ '
s R:;.t .. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION es 'l rf( *NTt; #j UNIVERSITY OF MIS.SOURI
' '4 RESEARCH REACTOR FACILITY p y D Number 4.4 Page 1- of 3 Date v
SUBJECT:
Reactor Coolant System N Annlicability f
This specification shall apply to the reactor coolant systems.
Obiective It is the objective of this specification to assure proper coolant for safe operation.
Specification
- a. The reactor coolant system shall consist of not less than a reactor pressure vessel, two primary system pumps, primary pressurizer, two primary heat exchangers, two pool system pumps, one 100% capacity or two 50% capacity.
pool system heat exchanger (s), and one pool system hold-up tank plus all associated piping and valves.
- b. The reactor coolant system shall have one secondary coolant system capable of-continuous discharge of heat generated at the operating power of the reactor,
- c. The pumps and heat exchangers in the primary system shall constitute two parallel systems separately instrumented to permit safe operation at five megawatts on either system or ten megawatts with both systems operating
? simultaneously. .3 J
aY