ML20064E822

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rejects 781017 Request by Util Th Have 780918 Amend Appl Changed from a Class III to a Class II Fee Rate.Eval of Request Required Consideration by Review Staff Beyond Pro Forma Nature & Thus Is a Class III Acton
ML20064E822
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear 
Issue date: 11/14/1978
From: Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: David Williams
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20064E824 List:
References
NUDOCS 7811240035
Download: ML20064E822 (1)


Text

-.

~

Pp f

UNITED STATES NUCt. EAR REGULATORY COMMisslON

)

{ e.

i WASMNGTON. D. C. 20556

%,...../

=

NOV 141978-DOCKET NO. 50-368 Arkansas Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. Daniel H. Williams Manager, Licensing P.O. Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Gentlemen:

Your letter dated October 17, 1978, provided your reasons for concluding that a Class II amendment fee is appropriate for your September 18, 1978 application for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2 rather than the Class III fee requested in op: letter dated September 29, 1978. Based on our reconsideration of your September 18 application and related documents, and our review of the data presented in your letter dated October 17, we consider the Class III fee to be fair and equitable because the review did involve a single safety issue with no significant hazards consideration.

It is our understanding that the valve repairs involved a no-flow condition for 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> with partial draining of the reactor coolant system. The review staff agrees that there was no concern over heat removal since the reactor has not yet been made critical. However, they were concerned about operations and procedures to preclude changes in reactivity during the repair period. The review staff approved your request of September 18 as Amendment No. 2 to NPF-6 on September 22, following a few discussions with your staff, based on the increased surveillance specified in the amendment regarding boron and control element assembly monitoring to maintain an acceptable level of safety. Thus the evaluation of your request. required consideration by the review staff beyond the pro forma or administrative nature of matters associated with a Class II type of action.

Sincerely,

~

,w y

.I~'

William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration 7Bvmp o

_