ML20064D040

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-261/82-36.Corrective Actions:Masonry Wall Determined to Be in Proximity of Nuclear Instrumentation Cabinets & Included in Design Evaluation Required by IE Bulletin 80-11
ML20064D040
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/24/1982
From: Starkey R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20064D001 List:
References
IEB-80-11, RSEP-82-1920, NUDOCS 8301040547
Download: ML20064D040 (2)


Text

, < O e

I s..'

Carolina Power & Light Company 0 A ~ #2 k 7" ' " " # * * ~3

~7 N 11. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT POST OFFICE BOX 790 HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 NOV2 41982 l Robinson File No: 13510E Serial: RSEP/82-1920 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W., Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET No. 50-261 LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE TO IE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 82-36

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Carolina Power and Light Company has received and reviewed the subject report and provides the following response.

A. Severity Level V Violation (IER-82-36-01) 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion V, and the accepted QA Program (March 18, 1982 letter, serial number 0QA-81-026) require that activities affecting quality be described by documented instructions of a type appropriate to the circumstances and be accomplished in accordance with these instructions.

Contrary to the above, instructions issued to implement IE Bulletin 80-11 requirements were not adequate to assure that all masonry walls in the vicinity of safety-related equipment would be identified and re-evaluated for their conformance to design requirements.

RESPONSE

1. Admission Or Denial Of The Alleged Violation Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) acknowledges the violation.

i 8301040547 821208 l PDR ADOCK 05000261 l G PDR 1

p < -- ,

-- Letter to Mr. James P. O'Reilly Serial: RSEP/82-1920 Page 2

2. Reason For The Violation The ins truct ions issued to implement the IE Bulletin 80-11 require-ments included a statement to review and respond to all of the Bulletin directives. CP&L believes that this is adequate guidance for responding to a Bulletin and, therefore, does not acknowledge that the instructions issued were inadequate. However, the review of Plant drawings and the walk through the Plant to identify the masonry walls that would be considered in the IEB-80-11 program in-advertently did not identify this masonry wall around the Control Room kitchen and bathroom as being in the proximity of safety-related equipment.
3. The Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken And Results Achieved This masonry wall was evaluated to be in the proximity of the nuclear instrumentation cabinets and, therefore, was included in a design evaluation as required by IE Bulle tin 80-11.
4. Correct ive Steps Taken to Prevent Recurrence CP&L believes that the error of not identifying the Control Room masonry wall was unique to this Bulletin and no generic corrective action is required. However, in an effort to ensure that appropriate personnel, both plant and corporate, unders tand the importance of providing accurate and in depth responses to these regulatory require-ments, this viola tion and response will be reviewed by applicable on-site and of f-site engineering personnel who normally would get involved with these types of investigations and responses.
5. Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance will be achieved by January 31, 1983.

If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact me.

Very truly yours,

, nr Ok LR. B. Starkey, Jr.

General Manager H. B. Robinson SEG Plant CLW: FMG :JMC/b ss cc: R. C. DeYoung

(

t-