ML20062J225
| ML20062J225 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/28/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Sutton J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062J207 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900302 NUDOCS 8208160304 | |
| Download: ML20062J225 (6) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
WESTERN PIPING AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ntfunt INSPECTION INSPECTION N0.
99900302/82-01 DATE(S):
5/17-21/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 28 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Western Piping and Engineering Company, Inc.
ATTN:
Mr. K. A. Friedman President 1485 Yosemite Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94124 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. R. Haytack, Quality Assurance Mgr.
TELEPHONE:
(415)822-6464 PRINICIPAL PRODUCT:
Class 1, 2, & 3 nuclear components - vessels and supports.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:
Commercial nuclear production of Western Piping and Engineering Company, Inc. (WP&E), San Francisco, California, totals 80% of all production.
Seven contracts are presently in-house for current and future production.
WP&E ASME Certificate of Authorization expires in 1984.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
u
@l#4 f.W.Sutton, Reactive &ComponentsProgram Date Section (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
/h 7ff[8L APPROVED BY:
arnes, Chief,GCPS
'Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
l A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
This inspection was made to review the status of previous inspection findings, Part 21 inspection, nonconformances - corrective action, machining, calibration, and vendor activities.
., A O
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Not identified J
a
, pe v
8208160304 820728
)
PDR GA999 EECWESTP 99900302 PDR I
I
ORGANIZATION: WESTERN PIPING AND ENGTHEERING COMPANY, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA REPORT I N S P tt.,i i Oh N0.:
99900302/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 0F 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 12 of the QA Manual, measuring instruments were not being entered in the Inspection Usage Log prior to use by the QC inspector for final accept-1 ance inspection.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Deviation (81-01):
Vendor was not determining the chlorine content of the medium for the hydrostatic test of stainless steel items.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken by WP&E as outlined in their March 2,1981, reply to NRC's deviation notice of February 2, 1981.
It was further verified that a chloride test kit had been purchased, a chloride test procedure (P-1332-001) has been generated, and a log of the medium testing is being maintained to prevent recurrence.
The preventive action taken by WP&E was found to be acceptable.
2.
(0 pen) Nonconformance (81-02):
No documented evidence that the threaded fasteners, attaching ears to the load distribution plate of support clamps, had been provided with locking devices to pre-vent loosening during service.
The vendor has not submitted his corrective action to the NRC as of the date of this inspection.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
10 CFR Part 21 Inspection - The inspector reviewed WP&E's written policy used for the reporting of identified component defects that could be reportable under 10 CFR Part 21 requirements.
The inspector reviewed WP&E reporting procedure P0200-001, Rev. 2, issued February 14, 1981.
Posting of Part 21 requirements was checked and found to be in order.
The inspector determined that the requirements for reporting and posting under 10 CFR Part 21 has been complied with as required by the regulations.
ORGANIZATION: WESTERN PIPING AND ENGINEERING COMPANY INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900302/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 0F 3 2.
Nonconformance/ Corrective Action - The inspector reviewed WP&E's QA manual section 15.0. " Nonconforming Items or Services," and section 16.0, " Corrective Action".
Four NCR's and System Discrepancy Reports (SDR's), and associated documentation were reviewed to determine compliance to QA program requirements.
The corrective action taken to prevent recurrence was examined for implementation.
Segregated areas designated for storage of nonconforming items were inspected.
Relative to the documents examined, the inspector determined that activities were in conformance with the QA program requirements and were being implemented as required.
3.
Manufacturing Control (Machining) - The inspector reviewed WP&E's QA manual section 9.0, " Control of Fabrication Processes," and witnessed ongoing machine work within the shop.
The inspector reviewed shop orders, procedures, drawings, and related documentation for three jobs in progress.
As a result of the review of this documentation, the inspector determined that machining operations were being performed as required by the QA program requirements.
4.
Calibration - The inspector reviewed WP&E's QA manual section 12.0,
" Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment." Measurement tools being used for final acceptance were checked for calibration dates and compliance to QA procedures.
During the course of the inspec-tion, it was observed that the measurement equipment being used for final acceptance of a component, had been calibrated as required, but the equipment had not been entered in the Inspection Usage Log as required by the QA program requirements (see section B of Inspection Results).
l l
l l-1
- f
)
- o e
r l
- y.
e b
b a
p m
c u
i N
l ttp
- .o 4
mnnp eeea N
t mm t
I uuf r
ccI o
l oo(
a ADD p
t 1
l t
o F-tffo i
n e
p-7r, E +
V, R
nooi e
e s
]
17 Y
r.
tI t
i.
- ueei sqpt v 3
4 neyae r
s-9 3
mSTDR 1-u l
o C1234 1
1 o
f.
0 2
r 0 ~.
n-o o
n i
/
M y
2 h U&
1 o
3 O
P
- 1 3
D D
1 E
e N
T 0
o 2
I C
k P
9 n
0 M
E i
e A
J 0
X B
a t
Z
?
S
- d w
n E
U O
7 S
/
o J
b M L ?
o o
1 T
E r
N L
7 f
c o
)
E T
o y
M I
f C
u 3
- /
U5 U
T j
r a
h m
e s
>n r p
/-
t s
O s
D nN n
~ s e
g, ]t w
c o
y i e
M c
e L
,f $
o p P
o n
- , f G
51 o
f l
u
^
n n )-
i n M w e J
b y
o b
N
/
R5 em ro f
&,A" s
Y -
n 0
i d e c
G 9 rM e
e 7
r o
4 m
- d
?. n t
r O
p v
J L
o o
l S
e o Y i
u L
sb l-t sa
(
e o
anr um u
t u
t D
j h rer tkc X
n 3 cet e l L
/a A l
4 o
9 o
rt th u
unet ih Y
o r 9 t 'S S d R ~E PI LO d l 0 3
o f
l.
c a
P 0 2 r o 0 R. R e
c e
i v
4 u
L S
T J
P v,2 f.
C O
5678 2
i t
r r
u/u
(
k N S r
j M
e n
W a.
o s1 i
u S
a 7-s t
E e
ael u&O t
p cra 2
3 F
9 9
3 9 3 2
5 F
y gi uu 8
3 5
5 w
sO T nfd n fr P 'A ii ea t wccM 3
e naeo erprA lu mDSPQ u
~
r d
t 3 4 f c
l
~) 8' 9 o
/.
o o
o L 3 t
M
/
i 1
(
i D1 234 I
c
/
1 I
e e
p p
s o
n c
I S
l,
2
)
of e
J.
r l
e b
o..
b a
/c gA m
c Wg u
i N
l ttp mnnp oof 4
eeea NN o t mm tt I uuf er2 ccI l oo(
bo cp o
z 2
1 ADD i
n o e' e 1
f f 2
tffo 4
DR g 4~
nooi a
V 2
o e
s P
ueei f
7 2
/
3-sqpt v 3
t neyae e
g t
9 o
'/
mSTDR u
e t
l h
o S
C1234
]L a
ta
&'" h D
v M w dl m
9 9
/
/
A' M A J
n o r b
k
=
1 w
m
- d L
D s
a E
u A
t I
v N
T c
Q I
C J
o M
E E
r A
J b
f O
f X
B E
U v
o S
ao
/-
L s
'2 y
S
/
M m.
u 9
Z.
~
T E
~
o i
/
N L
h
/
/
E T
)
z m4 O
MW l
/
y M
I n$
r U
T o
a C
h O
s r
o m<
D s
D Slr u
ec M
0 A e
r h.
M<
n P
WU J
f
/
y-V e
0 S
a 1
i
/
c y
o o
q o
o L
ro f
A em t
i 9
c u
t o
de c
c o
rM e
o 2
V e
O C 0o O
p t
n 6'
_ 5 o
e-l l
S t
3 we-Va a
c o
m e O sa
(
anr
'm_
n v
V
- aM h rer t
o cet e s
'n
[tw M
s.
1
. h 1
o 2 rt th D
t unet f
G m s.
2 2
N M K O
g o
d/
t u
x r
J 8 p 1 o
f.k t
/j u t
/
0 5678 D
A b
c b dQ l
no g;Q i
s t
a
/
e ael S W 4
p cra
[
3 4 4 R
T y gi uu 3
1 5
P 2
f I
T nfd n iiea t wccM e
naeo l
erprA mDSPQ u
r d
O L
u o
o 4
f o T 2 %
I c
l
(
I t
M l
2 1 I
o c
/
1 D1 234 e
e p
p
~
s o
n c
I S
,l l
PERSONS CONTACTED Company ll/estenv$hiA 4(Arndere eb /Mc.
Dates b~ ~/9 - 2/- 8 2.
I Docket / Report No. 99900 302 [#2-O/
Inspector
'TiW E b
/
Page d of
/
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) tr e loc L a wa U.t u te c.
m a L 7to J on F M r 1 (' /Efalest
?ic PNsi%J -
u) P + C. 60-
+ Mr R.M.1/aulnek Con /<A ArtanosMca td / f.
I
/
/
/
4 N!* brY hiPYMA A/.
tu t e'e f b r 4 r Wff{ %
~
/
/
.