ML20062J204
| ML20062J204 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1982 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Friedman K WESTERN PIPING & ENGINEERING CO., INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062J207 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#189-8116, REF-QA-99900302 2.206, NUDOCS 8208160295 | |
| Download: ML20062J204 (2) | |
Text
-_
i o <
Jul. 2 8 1982 Docket No.: 99900302/82-01 Western Piping & Engineering Company, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. K. A. Friedman President 1485 Yosemite Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94124 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by J. W. Sutton of this office on May 17-21,1982, of your facility at San Francisco, California, associated with the fabrication of nuclear components and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. J. C. Flaherty and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to confim that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others. You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effec-tive corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and i
representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and ref-erences to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
a (D F-Q Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written gg statement containing: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be co w taken to correct this item; (2) a description of steps that have been or W
will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates your corrective p$m actions and preventive measures were or will be corapleted. Consideration may ug be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
-eo hg The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearence procedures
.13 M
gg of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction p
Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
gg
" 'c 4.. Rg P.S.
...R&CP.S.d.....VP.B.. hh..D/.IEseg...RA/RIL.
" "^"'>..JSutto sm... J.Sg.n.M..
..VPotapays.
..Edohn son..
.@ 1. lins-
- >.?/.N/8..
. M I.(82
... m.g.82..... g.84.fp.4,. w.73 2...
OFFICIAL RECORD DOPY
~
l nac ronu n no soi nacu o2e
'. lo ',
Western Piping & Engineering l Company, Inc.
l l
In accordance with 10 CFR 2 790 of the Comission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the HRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent I
with section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the infonnation which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the state-l ment to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The infonnation sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this l
regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in l
the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
Oldis Potapovs. Chief Vendor Programs Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Honconfonnance 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900302/82-01 3.
Appendix C - Inspection Data Sheets (3 pages) bcc:
IE Files AE00 QAB NRC:PDR Reg. Administrator, I, II, III, IV, V EHJohnson, RIV
"'c'>
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
__-__ _- _ __ -_- _-_-____